The Helicopter Economics Investing Guide

The EU Has Fallen Into a Liquidity Trap and It Can't Get Up

2012-01-16T17:40:00.000-05:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While the EU is still reeling from S&P's downgrade of the sovereign debt of nine of its members on January 13th and the latest talks to keep Greece afloat have hit a wall, there is an even bigger problem with the effectiveness of its stimulus programs -- the money is just not finding its way into the economy.

Global markets were jubilant in December when the ECB (European Central Bank) pumped 490 billion euros of three-year loans into the EU banking system. These funds were used by eurozone banks to buy high-risk government debt from the struggling peripheral countries. This indeed caused a temporary decline in interest rates, especially for Spain and Italy. Money from this program and other EU stimulus measures is stuck in the banking system however and it is doing little to keep the EU from sinking into a deep recession. As of Monday January 16th, the ECB had 493 billion euros on overnight deposit -- more than the entire December stimulus package.

Large amounts of funds on deposit at any central bank are an indication of a crisis in the banking system. Before the current EU debt crisis, eurozone banks usually kept only around 100 million euros on deposit at the ECB. Even during the height of the 2008 Credit Crisis, EU banks kept only around 33% of money lent out by the ECB on deposit. The percent now is over 70% (the ECB has lent out 664 billion euros in total) meaning things are in much worse shape in the EU than they were after Lehman Brothers collapsed. When money is trapped in the banking system, the economy suffers and extra stimulus measures don't help to revive it. EU money-printing measures meant to rescue its profligate debt-ridden members aren't likely to help its economy, which in turn will result in a self-feeding cycle of more and more debt (as happened in Japan during the last two decades) or more and more money printing (as has been taking place in the U.S. since the 2008 Credit Crisis). Like the U.S., the EU has run out of borrowing power, so debt without money printing is no longer an option.

Weaker economies mean more downgrades from the ratings agencies can be expected. On Friday, both France and Austria lost their coveted triple A ratings from S&P. They were downgraded a notch as was Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia. Italy, Spain, Portugal and Cyprus were downgraded two notches. Italy is now rated BBB+. The only countries in the eurozone that still have triple A ratings are Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Finland. S&P put the later three on negative outlook for a possible future downgrade however. The EFSF bailout fund itself may also be downgraded.

The current debt crisis that is now impacting the entire eurozone started in Greece in late 2009. The problems there have yet to be fixed despite numerous mainstream media reports to the contrary in the last two years. Greece is now on financial life support. Any missed bailout payment from the EU will send it immediately into default. Talks have broken down once again, but as before will once again be resuming shortly. The market has never been convinced that any of the proposed Greek bailouts will work. On Monday, Greek one-year government bond yields hit a high of 416% and 10-year yields a high of 35%. These rates have continued to rise after each bailout proposal. Greece has to make substantial bond payments this March.

The EU's debt crisis is not getting resolved because it is no more possible to solve a debt crisis with more debt than it is to sober up a drunk by giving him more alcohol. Yet, every mainstream news article has comments from well-placed sources that are hopeful that some resolution will be coming to the EU's problems soon. Rarely is it mentioned they have been hopeful -- and wrong -- for the last two years as the situation has increasingly deteriorated. Nor is it mentioned that the Japanese with similar problems in their financial system have now been hopeful for twenty years that their economy will fix itself. Wishful thinking doesn't fix markets, nor do plans involving spining straw into gold -- no matter what central bankers and their toadies claim.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Retail Sales and Employment Not as Good as First Reported

2012-01-12T15:20:00.000-05:00

U.S. Non-farmPayrolls -- The Statistical Illusion of Jobs

2012-01-06T14:17:00.001-05:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Employment Report for December 2011 was released today with a glowing press release from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). The highlight of the report was the 42,000 courier and messengers jobs created last month and the claim that the unemployment rate fell to 8.5%

Statistics can easily be manipulated and it is not unknown for political regimes to do so in order to hold on to power (and 2012 is an election year in the U.S.). After all, it is much easier to change a number than to fix the underlying problem the number represents. Fortunately, the BLS publishes a number of statistical Tables with each monthly report that can be used to check its calculations.

When the Great Recession began in December 2007, the civilian non-institutional population of the United States was 189,993,000. At that time, the number of people in the U.S. labor force was 125,588,000. As of December 2011, the BLS states that the employment population ratio for the U.S. is 58.5% (0.585). The non-institutional population of the U.S. was reported at 193,682,000 or 3,689,000 higher than it was in December 2007. The labor force in December 2007 was 125,334,000 and multiplying the increase in the U.S. population in the intervening four years by the employment population ratio indicates that the labor force should have increased by 2,158,000 to 127,492,000. However, the BLS reports the U.S. labor force last month was 124,114,000. More than three million people are missing from its figures.

The smaller the labor force is, the better the headline unemployment rate becomes. The BLS claims these three million plus people left the labor force and this justifies purging them from the statistics. There is a problem with their line of reasoning however. Large numbers of people only leave a labor force during periods of severe economic distress. It does not happen during economic recovery. It does not indicate an employment situation that is improving. Yet, the BLS produces numbers showing things are getting better when this happens. This violates the first rule of statistics -- the results must reflect reality. The BLS numbers do not.

Dividing the number of employed in December 2011 by the size of the labor force that should exist based on the population numbers produces an unemployment rate of 9.6%, not 8.5%. This is the headline number that should be reported. If the BLS wants to insist however that more than three million people have indeed left the labor force (and this has continued in the last year -- the size of the labor force in December 2011 is smaller than it was in December 2010), it should also make it clear that this indicates that there has been an ongoing recession and no economic recovery has taken place. Both can't happen at the same time, except for a brief period. Either the economic recovery story is a lie or there hasn't been a shrinking labor force.

While mainstream economists will insist that employment is a lagging indicator (more than two years is some lag), this has only been the case in the U.S. years after statistical "improvements" were introduced in the 1980s and 1990s in how government economic numbers were determined. Before that, employment recovered with improving GDP as should be the case. If you think about it, the term jobless recovery makes as much sense as tall midget or genius moron.

The improvement in the weekly unemployment claims is also being cited as evidence of an improving jobs picture. It would be more accurate to say that it is evidence of a jobs picture than can't continue to get worse. As I have stated since at least mid-2010, the weekly claims number will regress toward the mean (move to its long-term average) because eventually there will be few workers who remain to be laid off. After being elevated for several years, the only way that weekly claims can now increase is with a big jump in bankruptcies. This will be avoided as long as the economy holds steady.

What is keeping the U.S. economy from getting worse is the unprecedented budget deficits that the U.S. is running. If you spend an extra $1.3 trillion dollars that you don't have as the U.S. did in 2011, this will certainly stimulate the economy in the short-term since much of this money winds up in consumer pockets and they spend it. According to the non-farm payrolls report for December, the U.S. is not exactly getting good value for this money. Unless of course, you think low-paying courier and messenger jobs should be the cornerstone of the economy.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

How Today's "Deflation" Can Turn Into Tomorrow's Hyperinflation

2012-01-04T16:42:00.000-05:00

Since the 2008 Credit Crisis, deflation has been the primary worry of mainstream economists and monetary and fiscal policies that utilize various forms of “money printing” have been implemented throughout the world to try to stop it. Unfortunately, money printing combined with deflation can potentially lead to hyperinflation.

Hyperinflation is a little understood and little studied phenomenon. Even inflation itself is only partially understood and traditional university economic programs devote minimal attention to it (just ask someone with an economics degree what courses they took in inflation). Almost no one seems to have made the connection between deflation and hyperinflation, which are intimately related. Hyperinflation in fact could actually be defined as a self-feeding cycle of severe deflation combined with escalating money printing.

Historical analysis shows that hyperinflation is a creature of damaged and dysfunctional economies. It does not come from overheated economies that continue to grow out of control resulting in ever higher inflation rates. This mythical view may have been created because government stimulus measures the employ money printing in its various guises to deal with deflation can briefly make the economy fervent because of a declining currency. This creates high export demand since foreigners can buy the country’s goods cheaply and high internal demand because the population becomes desperate to get rid of any currency it holds. This phase does not last however and it takes place just prior to the final hyperinflationary spike. It was seen in Weimar Germany in 1922 because Germany had a developed manufacturing economy and most of the rest of the world wasn’t experiencing currency devaluation.

In many cases in the past, war preceded hyperinflation. This happened in Germany and Eastern Europe after World War I and in Eastern Europe and Japan and East Asia after World War II. It also occurred in the United States after the Revolutionary War (arguably the first case of hyperinflation in history) and in the South at the end of the Civil War. Demand can collapse after a war and this will cause prices to drop (the U.S. had sharp deflation after World War I for instance). Governments, who were already printing money to support the war effort, then frequently print more to stimulate the economy. If the economy isn’t brought back to real functionality however, a country’s currency loses its value and an ever-increasing amount of money has to be printed to create the same amount of stimulus.

Even if there is no war, hyperinflation can exist just because an economy is dysfunctional. This would describe the cases of hyperinflation in South America, post-colonial Africa, and in Eastern Europe during the collapse of communism. When an economy just can’t create enough demand on its own, the authorities stimulate demand by printing money. This leads to the same cycle of currency devaluation and ever-increasing money printing in an attempt to keep up with the loss of value taking place. In reality, the economy is continually shrinking, even though prices start heading toward the heavens.

While this has happened in a number of countries over time, mainstream economists continually make the claim that inflation can’t exist if there is slack in the economy. Hyperinflationary economies actually have maximum slack, with Zimbabwe in the 2000s being the extreme example. Unemployment reached 94% there, while the inflation rate was climbing to the sextillion percent level (a number so huge it might as well be infinity). Despite this real world example that took place right before their eyes, a number of economists had no trouble looking right into the TV camera and telling the public that inflation can’t exist if there is excess capacity in the economy. If they had been testifying in court, they would have been arrested for perjury.

Since hyperinflation has only occurred in certain countries at certain times, it is important to ask what it the key factor or factors that lead to it. The short answer would be: deflation created by demand destruction, followed by money printing that is taking place because the ability to borrow doesn’t exist or has been exhausted. Since developed countries have better credit and can borrow more, hyperinflation is less likely to occur in them than in more marginal economies – at least until their lending sources dry up.

Deflation in and of itself does not lead to hyperinflation. It depends on what the root cause of the deflation is. There were deflations in the late 1800s and in the 1920s in the U.S. due to technological innovations and not demand destruction as commonly takes place after wars. Lack of demand was not the cause of falling prices, rising supply was. The exact opposite situation takes place after a destructive war or in an economy in a post-bubble era (as is the case currently in the U.S., the UK, Europe and Japan). In the latter case, demand needs to be stimulated, in the former it doesn’t.

Countries also don’t print money if they can borrow it. Less developed countries have limited and sometimes no borrowing ability and this means they turn to money printing early on and this makes them more prone to hyperinflation. Since developed countries can borrow money, they do so for as long they possibly can. This has allowed Japan to get its debt to GDP ratio to an astounding 229%. The U.S. is already over 100% (based on official numbers, the ratio using more realistic numbers is much worse) and rising rapidly. Despite its twenty years of economic malaise, Japan has managed to support demand by running huge and continuing budget deficits funded by the massive savings of its people (money printing has been relatively minor). It is not likely any other developed country will be able to accomplish what Japan has done. Japan also seems to have reached the end of the borrowing road and will have to start revving up the printing presses in the near future.

In contrast to the Japanese, Americans save little and haven’t been able to fund their budget deficits internally for decades —the U.S. relies on foreign sources for this money. When the Credit Crisis arose, foreign lending became inadequate and money printing began in earnest. The Federal Reserve increasing its balance sheet by over $2 trillion is only one example of this. While foreign lending might have continued to fund $400 billion dollar annual budget deficits, it was not adequate to support the $1.42 trillion, $1.29 trillion and$1.30 trillion deficits that occurred in 2009, 2010, and 2011. Trillion dollar deficits are going to with the U.S. for many years into the future and the only way they can be completely funded is by printing more and more money. The EU isn’t in much better shape either and has been unable to fund its peripheral country debt by borrowing. Its current solution is to print money through massive credit expansion.

Claims that money printing won’t be harmful in the 2010s because inflationary policies were utilized during the 1930s Great Depression and they worked well back then are moreover completely misleading. The debt level of the U.S. government, businesses and consumers were minimal at that time compared to what exists today. Huge amounts of untapped borrowing capacity existed then, but this is no longer true. Consumer credit expanded so much in the intervening years that during one month of the Credit Crisis it dropped more than the entire amount outstanding at the end of World War II. An apt analogy might be one drink of alcohol won’t be harmful. If you haven’t had anything to drink yet it isn’t likely it will be. If you have already had twenty glasses, it might cause fatal alcohol poisoning. The global financial system now risks being poisoned by money printing.

The monetary authorities worry about deflation and attempts to handle it with money printing are nothing new. The current actions are disturbingly similar to what took place in Weimar Germany in the early 1920s. They handled their deflation problem with money printing as well. As prices rose, instead of facing reality, the economics establishment acted in concert to deny the obvious. Deflation was cited as the biggest danger to the economy until it became laughable. When inflation exploded, the usual scapegoats — foreigners, speculators and minorities — were blamed by the government. Unless human behavior has changed in the last 100 years, the same scenario is likely to play itself out again in the 2010s.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Risks to the Global Financial System in 2012

2012-01-03T14:13:00.000-05:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
As 2012 begins, markets are rallying as they did at the beginning of 2011 -- a year when the S&P 500 closed flat after many huge moves up and down. The problems in Europe that rattled markets in 2011 have not been resolved and new problems are or will be emerging in China and Japan. At the very least, investors should expect another rocky ride in the upcoming year.

The debt crisis in the EU is far from over. It is simply being momentarily contained by another short-term solution that will hold things together for a while until the crisis erupts again. The mid-December LTRO (long term purchase operations) announced by the ECB excited the markets as any money-printing scheme would. This new "solution" to the debt crisis is essentially an attempt to handle a problem of too much debt with more debt. Already close-to-insolvent EU banks are able to hold fewer assets for collateral in exchange for cheap funding from the ECB, which can in turn be used to buy questionable sovereign debt from the PIIGS. While this will keep Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland financially afloat for a longer period of time, it may collapse troubled EU banks sooner (the real epicenter of the debt crisis).

Half way across the globe, problems are emerging in China. It is estimated that there are between 10 and 65 million empty housing units in the country that investors have purchased with the hope of selling at higher prices. There are in fact entire "ghost districts" there that are filled with new buildings and no residents. Prices have become so high that by last spring the typical Beijing resident would have to have worked 36 years to pay for an average-priced home. The pressure appears to be coming off though with new home prices dropping 35% in November. Beijing builders still have 22 months of unsold inventory and Shanghai builders 21 months. In the peripheral areas, existing home sales have plummeted -- down 50% year on year in Shenzhen, 57% in Tianjin, and 79% in Changsha. Investors should take note that the Chinese real estate bubble is far worse than the U.S. one that brought the global financial system to its knees at the end of 2008.

Twenty years ago, Japan had a massive real estate bubble and it is possible that prices have finally bottomed there, but that doesn't mean that they are ready to go up. Japan has had two decades of economic stagnation (and is heading toward a third, if it is lucky) because of the collapse of its real estate and stock market bubbles. Massive borrowing by the government has prevented the situation from getting worse. The debt to GDP ratio in Japan is now estimated to be 229% (well above the just over 100% in the U.S.). More people are leaving the workforce there than entering it and this bodes ill for tax receipts. The aging population is using up its savings instead of adding to them. This is a potentially serious problem because the massive debt the Japanese government has incurred has been funded mostly internally by the savings of the Japanese people. A lot of old debt has to be rolled over in 2012 and additional debt is still being incurred. Where the money will come from is not clear.

None of the problems that could strain the global financial system originated in 2011. They have been building up for years and even decades. The first major blow up was the Credit Crisis in 2008. In every case, that problem was "solved" by more debt and money printing. This approach has of course only postponed the inevitable since taking on more debt only creates a bigger debt problem down the road and you can't create something of value out of thin air by printing money (although you will ultimately create a lot of inflation). The markets have already spent most of 2011 in an unstable state. It looks like continuing and even bigger crises await investors in 2012.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security

A Technical Look at Gold and Silver at the End of 2011

2011-12-30T10:36:00.000-05:00

Silver shows greater weakness than gold on its charts with the selling much more advanced. Unlike gold, silver has hit new yearly lows and when this happens the first time, it is likely that a series of new lows will then be made, although short rallies frequently take place first. For SLV, the major silver ETF, the 50-day moving average already fell below the 200-day in October and the bearish pattern was confirmed when the 50-day then fell below the 325-day at the end of November. On the daily charts, the DMI is on a sell signal and this seems to be only halfway done at this point. The other technical indicators are also bearish. SLV is currently being held up by support around 26. Much stronger support exists around 21 (really a band of support between 18 and 21).

The recent drops in gold and silver should be considered to be buying opportunities, although investors with a longer-term horizon should not be pushing the buy button just yet. The charts do not indicate a definitive bottom has been put in, nor that this is likely to happen in the next few weeks. Secular bull markets tend to last for around 20 years and this indicates the ultimate high for gold and silver will be around 2020. While there is always a higher high in the future during secular bulls that doesn't mean that there aren't major reversals along the way. The stock market secular bull between 1982 and 2000 had the 1987 crash, the 1989 and 1997 flash crashes, the 1990/91 bear market and the 1998 bear market. Smart investors used these declines as buying opportunities and made lots of money when they did. The same will be true for gold and silver for the rest of this decade.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Rumors of Housing's Rise From the Dead Are Greatly Exaggerated

2011-12-20T11:06:00.000-05:00

Housing starts for November were released today, December 20th, and the stock market rallied strongly on the supposedly "good" news. The statistical error rate in the housing report is so huge, that the numbers are meaningless -- and easily subject to manipulation by a government that is desperate to provide news of a recovering economy.

Housing starts peaked at 2,273,000 in January 2006. According to the Commerce Department, construction of new U.S. residences in November 2011 was 635,000. Almost five years later, housing activity is still less than 28% of what it was at the peak. Despite this almost three-quarters decline in housing activity, this is being spun as evidence of an economic recovery by the mainstream media. Would you consider it progress if your salary was only 28% of what is was five years ago?

As dismal as this statistic is, it is very possible the actual number is much worse. The housing starts report has the highest statistical margin of error of any government report. The error is so huge that is a waste of taxpayer money to produce this report. The error in the overall number can be greater than ten percent. The error on individual components can be as much as 33%. This is important because better housing start numbers in 2011 (November was not the first month when better numbers were reported, this took place earlier in the year as well), have been created by a supposed surge in apartment house construction. Apartment construction rose by 25.3% in November and this is what is making the overall number higher. Considering the huge statistical error rate, it is possible that it didn't rise at all.

Optimists who think it did rise by that much need to ponder the implications of why a lot of apartments are being built and very few single-family houses. The inescapable conclusion is that few Americans can afford to buy their own home anymore. I would hardly describe that as an indication of better economic conditions. Even more telling is that the number of completed housing units dropped by 5.6% in November even though housing starts rose earlier this year. If this is correct, a lot of housing that is begun is not being finished. While that makes no sense, nothing else about the report does either.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Breaks Down, Where to Look for a Bottom

2011-12-15T11:19:00.000-05:00

The bearish behavior of gold in latter 2008 was caused by the Credit Crisis. While you have probably heard ad nauseum that gold is a safe haven in a crisis, this does not include credit crises
(which are crises in the financial system when the banking system has difficulty functioning). We just saw that gold went down during the 2008 credit crisis and yet many gold "experts" somehow can't figure out that it should go down during the current 2011 credit crisis coming out of Europe. In our era, gold can drop during a credit crisis because central banks lease gold at low rates to the big banks and hedge funds. These entities are desperate to raise cash, so they sell the gold into the market (they can't sell many of the assets on their books). This depresses the price of gold -- temporarily. But at some point, they have to buy the gold back and return it to the central bank it was leased from. This makes the price of gold rise again. I explained the entire process in the second volume of my book "Inflation Investing", which covers gold, silver and other metals.

Gold has support at the 65-week simple moving average, but this is not the likely bottom in a full-blown credit crisis. In order to find that, it is necessary to look at a monthly chart. It can be seen from this that the ultimate support would be at the 40-month simple moving average. Currently, this is around 120 for the gold ETF GLD. This possible buy point, which should be considered a worst-case scenario, was discussed in the October meeting of the New York Investing meetup. See the five-year monthly chart for GLD below.

It's important for investors to focus on the big picture and not get carried away with all the distractions of day to day price movements. Markets go up and down. No market goes in one direction. Every time gold drops, commentators come out of the woodwork saying it means the rally is over and deflation is taking place -- neither is true. It is the bigger price movements that have meaning and gold is in a long-term uptrend. In any secular bull market, a large drop is always a golden opportunity to buy. Just wait until there is some evidence that a bottom has been put in.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York
Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold and Silver Plummet as Dollar Rallies on EU Woes

2011-12-14T12:00:00.000-05:00

New EU Plan is Much Ado About Nothing

2011-12-09T12:35:00.000-05:00

Volcker Says U.S. Mired in Recession and Inflation is Coming

2011-12-07T23:31:00.019-05:00

In a talk given to a small audience at the American Museum of Finance on Wednesday evening, former Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker stated that there was an ongoing recession in the U.S. and that we will be seeing inflation in the future because of the actions of the Fed and Treasury during the 2008 Credit Crisis.

While most of Volcker's talk centered on the current crisis in Europe, he frequently made connections to what was going on in the EU to what has taken place in the United States. His remarks about the U.S. being mired in an ongoing recession were in response to a question on whether an infrastructure bank would be a good idea. As part of his answer he stated, "We're not going to end the recession in the next month or the next year. It's going to take several years before the recession is over." The U.S. government claims that the last recession ended in June 2009and has repeatedly said that the U.S. has not fallen back into recession even though unemployment and consumer confidence have continually remained at recession levels.

When discussing the bailouts during the Credit Crisis, Volcker remarked "people said that there will be inflation... that's true over time." Volcker was critical of pro-inflation policies. He said that "the problem with inflation is that it looks so enticing, but the historical record doesn't verify that it is." He continued, "We would be very foolish if we deliberately went out and created inflation." The Federal Reserve under Ben Bernanke has kept Fed Funds rates around zero percent for three years now, which means real interest rates have been negative. Negative interest rates are highly inflationary as is money printing. The Fed has expanded its balance sheet — one of the many ways it prints money — by over $2 trillion dollars since September 2008.

Volcker described the 2008 Credit Crisis as a "regulatory failure", but added "the Fed is only one regulator". He went on to state that "the Federal Reserve took a lot of extraordinary measures" to handle events back then and "the Fed and the Treasury did not necessarily follow the letter of the law" in attempting to control the damage to the financial system. Volcker further laid part of the blame for the Credit Crisis to proprietary trading by banks and said he was "not in favor of banks being speculative entities being supported by the U.S. government".

Paul Volcker was Chairman of the Federal Reserve from August 1979 to August 1987 and is widely credited with bringing down the high inflation of the 1970s by raising interest rates. More recently he headed the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which he left in February.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

2011-12-02T10:04:00.000-05:00

Is October's Unemployment Rate Really 12.7%?

2011-11-04T13:28:00.000-04:00

EU Deal With Greece Falling Apart

2011-11-01T11:44:00.000-04:00

More Contradictions in Third Quarter GDP

2011-10-27T14:00:00.000-04:00

It's a 50% Default for Greece

2011-10-27T01:22:00.000-04:00

October Consumer Confidence Well Into Recession Territory

2011-10-25T20:30:00.000-04:00

Can the EU Solve Its Debt Crisis with More Debt?

2011-10-21T12:46:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

European and U.S. stocks were rallying on Friday in what appears to be a liquidity frenzy supplied by the central banks. The market is once again hopeful now that EU leaders are beginning six days of meetings on how to save Greece and the euro. Based on their previous track record, which has led to the current crisis, there is little reason for long-term optimism.

Stock prices have not been the only thing rising lately. Interest rates have been too in the credit- challenged Eurozone countries. While yields of Greek one-year governments have fallen back to only 180%, they were as high as 189% on October 19th. Greek two-years are at a more manageable 77%. Rates keep increasing in Greece despite the bailouts and this indicates the bailouts aren't nearly large enough and will have to continue and get bigger to keep the country out of default. The political will for ongoing and ever-larger amounts of bailout money doesn't exist in the EU or does it?

While the EU voting public doesn't approve of spending more rescue money, the EU has created the EFSF (European Financial Stability Facility) — a 440 billion euro fund to help bail out its member countries that have debt problems and to bail out the banks that lent them the money that allowed them to have those debt problems. Much remains to be decided on how the EFSF will actually function. There is disagreement of how to use it to bail out failing banks for instance (this is currently being referred to as recapitalization since bank bailouts are also unpopular with voters). There is also a proposal to leverage EFSF funds up to five times, so there will be more than two trillion euros available. This idea is apparently a "helpful" suggestion made by the U.S. monetary authorities.

While the stock market is showing almost as much enthusiasm for the leveraged bailout proposal as it did for the great innovation of triple A rated subprime mortgages in the mid-2000s, such financial trickery ended badly the first time and is likely to fall apart even faster this time. Mainstream media coverage, at least in the U.S., rarely looks at where the money is coming from for the EFSF. Technically, the money is being borrowed. So in order to deal with a debt crisis that is wreaking havoc on the financial system because of too much risk, more money will be borrowed and then that money will be leveraged (a form of borrowing in and of itself) to magnify the risk of the new borrowing. If this appears not to make any sense at all, that's because it doesn't. When the default comes — and there is 100% chance that it will — the end will be much, much worse.

A case can be made however that the EFSF money isn't really borrowed, but a form of money printing instead. If governments borrow without the ability to actually pay back the money without inflating their currency, they are printing money. EU countries are already highly indebted just like the United States (Japan is in even worse shape). The fact that there is a debt crisis in a number of Eurozone countries is confirmation that the level of debt is beyond the point of no return. So a more accurate portrayal of what is going on with the EFSF is that money will be printed, this counterfeit money will be leveraged by borrowing against it and this will solve the problem of too much debt.

The world has already lived through a debt binge in the early 2000s. The current crisis centered in Europe is simply a continuation of the unraveling of that debt. Governments handled the first implosion with trillions of dollars of bailouts, by running trillions of dollars in budget deficits, and by printing trillions of dollars of money. Debt problems keep resurfacing however. Could it be that engaging in additional reckless and irresponsible financial behavior isn't a solution for reckless and irresponsible financial behavior? EU leaders may wish to ponder this before going forward.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Inflation Picking Up Globally Leading to Stagflation

2011-10-19T11:06:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Britain shocked the markets on October 18th when it reported an inflation rate of 5.2% for September. This was up from 4.5% the previous month and well above government projections. Inflation isn't just rising there, but higher prices are a global phenomenon.

The world seems to be entering a new period of stagflation similar to the 1970s. Stagflation is high inflation and low GDP growth. This is very evident in the UK where GDP growth for the second quarter was only 0.2% — a full 5% lower than the current CPI (the difference between the UK Retail Price Index is even greater). The only surprising thing about the UK inflation rate is that the official rate is so low given the amount of money printing done through quantitative easing in 2009 and 2010.

Despite the low growth and high inflation that has resulted from it, the Bank of England (BOE) has just started another round of QE. BOE Governor Mervyn King recently stated, "Without monetary stimulus — low interest rates and large asset purchases — there is a risk that growth will stall and inflation fall below our symmetric 2 percent target." As of September, the UK inflation rate has been above the bank's target rate for 22 months in a row. This is happening even though unemployment is also at a 17-year high. Central bankers have consistently maintained the inflation can't be elevated if the economy is weak. They have apparently managed to do so because they don't let real world observations intrude on their thinking.

Inflation is also rising elsewhere as well. On the European continent, the official EU rate rose from 2.5% in August to 3.0% in September. GDP increased by 0.2% there in the second quarter. Inflation has already been elevated in China and India for some months. China's inflation rate in September was 6.1% with food prices increasing at 13.4%. The price of necessities is rising faster there than the price of other goods. This is a common pattern in a number of countries. The yearly inflation rate in India was 9.0% in August.

In the U.S., the CPI for September indicated a 3.9% year over year rise in consumer prices. This rate severely underestimates actual inflation. According to the alternative numbers produced by Shadow Stats, the current U.S. inflation rate is approximately 11% (Shadow Stats calculates its numbers with the formulas utilized by the U.S. government in the 1970s and this is the only way to get valid comparisons of U.S. inflation numbers across time). Official U.S. GDP growth for the second quarter of 2011 was 1.3% — well below even the government's reported inflation rate.
Even though a clear picture of stagflation is emerging globally, expect this to be continually denied by mainstream news sources. Even yesterday in its reporting on U.S. producer prices, one of the major news services stated, "the strong rise in wholesale prices last month is unlikely to prompt a broad increase in inflation pressures given the weak economy." This is actually pure misinformation. There is a long, long history of high inflation throughout the world during periods of low economic growth or even severe decline. One of the most recent cases historically was in the 1970s when inflation skyrocketed in 1974 during the worst economic downturn since the 1930s depression. Both Fed Chair Ben Bernanke and BOE Governor Mervyn King were around at that time, but apparently can't seem to recall it. Perhaps if central bankers had better memories, they wouldn't be repeating the mistakes of the past today.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security

2011 Budget Deficit Third One Over a Trillion Dollars

2011-10-14T15:35:00.007-04:00

60% Cut for Greek Bondholders on the Table

2011-10-14T12:08:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
Bloomberg reported overnight that Greek bondholders were preparing to lose 60% on their investments. This is much bigger than the constructive default of 21% proposed with the second bailout in July. A big cut in the value of Greek bonds will cause major problems for German and French banks — and the ECB itself.

Rumors have been floating around the markets for days about a managed default of Greek debt at around the 50%, or greater, level and an occasional brief or cryptic comment has been made publically by EU officials. While this news was reported by the Helicopter Economics Investing Guide blog days ago, it is only just now filtering into the mainstream news services even though a large cut on Greek debt is an arithmetic inevitability. The only alternative would be a second bailout package several times larger than the proposed 109 billion euros (say 500 billion euros or more). Considering that populations of the EU countries are hostile to spending even the 109 billion euros, additional bailout funding is highly unlikely.

Bloomberg quoted a number of well-placed financial executives, including the CEO of Deutsche Bank, in its report indicating a general consensus was building that Greek bondholders would accept a deep reduction in their holdings. There ECB (European Central Bank) seems to be a major exception however. The ECB had amassed a considerable holding of Greek debt earlier on in an attempt to hold down interest rates there. Interest rates have since gone as high as 141% on Greek one-year governments. The ECB subsequently bought up debt from Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy to hold interest rates down in those countries. Investors should expect that ultimately these efforts will prove just as successful as they have in Greece.

Recapitalization (a euphemism for "bailout") will be necessary for EU banks if they have to take major losses on their Greek loans. Dexia, the largest bank in Belgium, folded almost overnight recently and its exposure to Greek debt was only a little over 1% of its loan portfolio — and this was before talk of a 60% haircut for Greek bonds. Imagine what would happen to banks with larger exposures? EU banks also hold substantial amounts of loans to Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. The largest holders of Greek debt by far are of course Greek banks themselves. Proton Bank recently closed there, but officials made it clear that it was because of alleged criminal activity and not because of the debt crisis.

Sovereign credit and bank downgrades throughout the EU are becoming increasingly common. S&P downgraded Spain's long-term credit rating from AA to AA- with a negative outlook (meaning more cuts are likely) today. The agency predicted Spain would miss its deficit cutting targets for 2011 and 2012. S&P downgraded the credit ratings of a number of Spanish banks three days ago including Santander (STD). Credit Suisse analysts just declared the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) to be the "most vulnerable" bank in Europe. RBS is 87% owned by the UK government. Credit rating agency Fitch threatened across the board downgrades of the banks yesterday. This potential downgrade would impact Barclays (BCS), BNP Paribas (FR: BNP), Credit Suisse (CS), Deutsche Bank (DB), Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), and Société Générale (FR:GLE) among others.

Perhaps in the next few weeks there will be some temporary resolution to the Greek debt crisis. Unless the cut that bondholders are forced to take is big enough, it won't last however. Whatever happens with Greece won't solve the problems in Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and possibly in Belgium. To be effective, the recapitalization (bailouts) of EU banks will have to be substantial. This will by necessity involve using money printing to resolve a debt crisis. That's actually already been done since 2008 and look at what great shape the global financial system is in now.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wishful Thinking on Economy and Europe Driving Markets

2011-10-11T12:17:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

U.S. stocks had a major rally on Columbus Day based on the French and German leaders' mystery plan to recapitalize EU banks and on raised forecasts for U.S. economic growth in the second half of 2011. While both news items seemed to contain nothing but wishful thinking, that's often enough for short-term traders.

The Dow Industrials closed up 3.0% and Nasdaq 3.5% on low trading volume. Big moves in the market are more likely when many traders are away and the people who want to move the market know this. Huge rallies under such circumstances are common in severe bear markets. Nasdaq for instance went up 4.9% on Friday July 5th in 2002 when almost everyone was off on a four day weekend. The market then had an ugly selloff later in the month and an even bigger drop in September and October.

It shouldn't be surprising that "good" news on the economy appeared on Columbus Day. The timing had probably been carefully planned. Goldman Sachs and Macroeconomic Advisers raised their growth forecasts for third quarter U.S. growth to 2.5 percent from about 2 percent and this created the predictable cheerleading coverage from the mainstream media that the U.S. was avoiding a recession. While it is certainly possible that the government will report GDP growth of 2.5% in the 3rd quarter, this does not mean that the U.S. is avoiding a recession, or even that the U.S. isn't currently in a recession. The original GDP numbers at the beginning of the Great Recession weren't that bad either, but they have since been revised down.... again ... and again ... and again. This is how GDP reporting works in the United States. Good numbers are released when everyone is watching and the downward revisions, which can go on for years, are reported when no one is paying attention.

Adding juice to the rally was the news that the German and French had a plan to recapitalize the EU's crumbling banking system. No details of the plan were available however. The lack of information can mean only one of three things. The first possibility is that there is no plan at all or the details are so sketchy that releasing them would make it clear that nothing significant had occurred. Alternatively, there might be a plan that could work, but the chances of getting it approved by everyone involved are close to nil. Or there could be a plan that has a good chance of being approved, but wouldn't be very effective. Regardless, there was no good reason for a market rally from this "recapitalization you can believe in" piece of news.

The EU banking/debt crisis has no easy solutions and will have an ugly ending of some sort despite the mainstream media's constant stream of upbeat "things are getting better" articles. ECB president Trichet admitted today that the EU's debt crisis has become systemic and has moved from the smaller countries to the larger ones. The rumors of a possible 60% haircut on Greek debt (reported by the Helicopter Economics Investing Guide on Monday and in the financial pages throughout the EU on Tuesday) may even be optimistic. When Luxembourg's Prime Minister Juncker was interviewed on Austrian TV late yesterday about the rumors of a 50% to 60% reduction in Greek debt having to be taken, he replied "we're talking about even more."

A credit crisis can have a devastating impact on the global economy as was made quite evident in 2008. While a case can be made that the monetary authorities have learned how to handle a credit crisis from their recent experience, they have less to work with than they did three years ago. Fed funds rates have already been close to zero for almost three years in the U.S. Quantitative easing has already been done twice in the U.S. and is on its second round in the UK, although it's already run into a glitch there. The BOE refused to buy gilts for the first time ever on Monday because they were too expensive. Maybe money printing isn't the panacea it's supposed to be after all. If not, the global financial system is in a lot of trouble.

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Is Dexia Bank the Bear Stearns of the Current Credit Crisis?

2011-10-10T10:41:00.000-04:00

U.S. Employment Still at Recession Levels in September

2011-10-07T15:47:00.001-04:00

BOE Kicks Off New Global Money Printing Cycle

2011-10-06T10:00:00.000-04:00

Updating the Definition of a Bear Market

2011-10-05T11:21:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While there is a lot of talk about the S&P 500 being in a bear market because it fell 20% from its high, this definition is not particularly useful to traders or investors. The focus should be on whether or not the market is trending down and will continue to do so. A market having fallen by so much, regardless of what the amount chosen is, does not provide that information.

The term bear market dates backs to at least the 18th century and was in common use on Wall Street in the 19th. All calculations were done by hand back then and changes in prices were all traders had to go on. Just as is the case today, much of trading took place based on momentum. Traders assumed that if the market was going down, it would continue to do so and vice versa. At some point a 20% drop became the rule of thumb that a drop was serious and likely to continue. While 20% certainly indicates a major fall in prices, the markets may or may not continue to fall after that level is reached.

A much better approach, the concept of moving averages and the idea of using them as trading guidelines didn't develop until the twentieth century. The 50-day and 200-day moving averages became the standard benchmarks for determining bullish and bearish patterns. This approach could only be widely implemented after computers became generally available. A bear pattern was established when the price fell below and remained below the 200-day moving average (the price would be trading at or below the 50-day as well). The bear would be confirmed when the 50-day moving average crossed the 200-day from above and moved below it. This is nowadays referred to with the dramatic term "death cross". This generally takes place before a market has lost 20% of its value.

The so called death cross took place for all the major U.S. indices in August and for many this confirmed that stocks were in a bear market. The 50-day, 200-day cross is prone to failure however. It tends to give too many false signals, as was the case in the summer of 2010 when all major U.S. indices also made this cross and then reversed shortly thereafter. Not only was there no bear market, but a major rally followed.

Instead of using the 50-day and 200-day moving averages as benchmarks, a more accurate bear market
reading can be obtained from using the 50-day and 325-day moving averages (or 10-week and 65-week moving averages). While this will provide a bear market confirmation later, it will be more accurate when it does so. It takes a lot of selling energy to drive the 50-day moving average below the 325-day and if the market can't accomplish this, a real bear market doesn't exist.  Although this provides a later sell signal, it provides an earlier buy signal on the way back up.

The S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 made the 50-day, 325-day cross in mid-September, but had already made the 10-week, 65-week cross by the beginning of the month. The Dow industrials and the Nasdaq made the daily cross at the end of September, but had already had a cross on the weekly charts by the middle of the month. Based on the weekly charts, the S&P was already in a bear market for a month before the 20% intraday drop took place on October 4th.

Investors and traders need not rely on just moving averages to find out whether or not a bear or bull market exists. Volatility can provide an important additional clue. The daily price swings for stocks in the summer of 2010 were relatively minor compared to those in August 2011. Volatility is bearish for markets and its presence recently is just another confirmation of a serious and prolonged downturn.

Modern technical analysis also provides a whole bag of tricks to help determine if a bear or bull market exists. The DMI (directional movement indicator) is the most directly applicable. Investors want to look for a clear sell signal with a rising trend line on the DMI  on the weekly charts (the daily charts are too "noisy"). A sell signal was given in late July on the S&P 500, the Russell 2000 and the Dow Industrials. The trend line has been going up since then indicating a strengthening downtrend. A sell signal appeared in August for Nasdaq. It then failed, but a new sell signal was given in September.

There is more than enough reason to believe that U.S. stocks are in a bear market regardless of what percentage drop has taken place. Moving averages, volatility and technical indicators are all indicating that a bear market started in the U.S. somewhere between late July and mid-September 2011. This bear will not end until the 10-week moving averages cross back above their respective 65-week moving averages, volatility calms down, and DMI buy signals are given on the weekly charts.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

S&P 500 Joins Global Bear Market

2011-10-04T11:10:00.000-04:00

A Terrible Third Quarter Will Be Followed by a Bad Fourth

2011-10-03T10:12:00.001-04:00

There is no reason to think that the market will bottom until problems in Europe come to some stable resolution. Greece admitted over the weekend that it would not be meeting the budget targets that were part of the terms of the first bailout. Global markets are once again selling off, as if this was somehow surprising news — Greece has misrepresented its financial number repeatedly, it would only be surprising if they turned out to be accurate. Greece may still get its next tranche of bailout money, since the EU has shown over and over again that its standards for the currency union are meaningless. Eventually though Greece will default because too much bailout money will be needed to keep it afloat. Even at that point, Spain and Italy will have to be reckoned with.

The other issue facing the markets is a global economic downturn. While a case can be made that the post-Credit Crisis economy never got out of recession (the unemployment rate and consumer confidence remained at recession levels for instance), the important question is whether or not economic activity is declining now. Last week, even the ECRI (Economic Cycle Research Institute) admitted the U.S. economy was heading down. Since a credit crisis can make an economic decline much worse, this doesn't bode well for the markets in the upcoming months.
Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Markets Rally on Hopes of Huge EU Bailout

2011-09-27T11:31:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

In a replay of the 2008 Credit Crisis, global stock markets are now rallying strongly after a huge selloff last week. This pattern was common in late September and all during October three years ago. It seems to be replaying itself again in 2011. Huge moves down and up are common in severe bear markets.

As has happened many times so far, stocks are rallying on "hopes" of a resolution to the Greek debt problem and liquidity issues with EU banks. The Greek prime minister has stated confidently that Greece will definitely receive the next tranche of money from the first bailout and his comments got a lot of positive press attention. The mainstream press failed to inform the public that Greek officials have consistently made "misleading" statements during the debt crisis and their credibility might be considered questionable. The next payment from the first bailout has been delayed because Greece broke the promises it made for meeting fiscal objectives. Instead of listening to Greek officials, investors should consider that Greece has a CCC credit rating — the lowest sovereign debt rating in the world. If any country is going to default anywhere, it's Greece.

The numbers describing Greece's situation also speak for themselves and clearly indicate the inevitability of default. Greece's debt to GDP ratio was 127% in 2009 in the early stages of the crisis. By the end of 2010, it was 143%. Reuters and a number of other sources report it as now around 160%. This rapid rise is taking place as Greece is getting €110 billion bailouts (the second one is in the works). Clearly the bailouts are not solving the problem, but merely slowing down an explosion of debt. Historically, once a country's debt to GDP goes over 150%, default seems to become inevitable.

The market keeps predicting default in Greece by setting astronomical interest rates. The one-year government bond had a yield of 138% on September 26th, down from its high of 142% on September 14th. Two-year debt was yielding 71% yesterday and the ten-year bond 24%. How can any entity pay these interest rates and avoid default?

All sorts of schemes are being discussed by EU leaders to handle the current crisis. There are rumors of a default plan that involves Greece paying back only half of its debt. EU officials described these rumors as just speculation, although in some cases the denials were less than firm. They also denied any enlargement of the EFSF (European Financial Stability Facility) — the EU's 440 billion euro bailout slush fund — was underway. The current global stock market rally got started when CNBC News reported that the EFSF would be leveraged up to eight-times and the European Investment Bank would issue bonds to buy up sovereign debt. The specific reaction to this report from one EU official was that it was "just bizarre". The big-money investing operations can make quite a bit of profits by planting "just bizarre" stories though because they can juice the markets up for a day or two. Then some bad news story appears and markets drop right back down. We've seen this pattern over and over again in the last two months.

At some point, the Greek debt crisis will be resolved. Until then, the EU will kick the can down the road as long as it can. At this point though, the can looks like it was run over by a freight train and then tossed around by a tornado. Greek debt holders will have to take a significant haircut on their debt and this means that banks in Germany and France will have to be recapitalized. Then something will have to be done to prevent the emerging defaults in Portugal and Ireland (both have already been bailed out once) and prevent the situation in Spain and Italy from getting bad enough to need a bail out. This will take a lot of money, much more than the €440 billion in the EFSF. Where will this money come from? It's quite simple — it will be printed.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold and Silver Recover After Big Drop in Asia

2011-09-26T10:08:00.000-04:00

Silver Crashes; Gold Breaks Key Support

2011-09-23T15:16:00.000-04:00

Stocks and Commodities Setting Up for a Major Breakdown

2011-09-22T16:44:00.000-04:00

The Twisted Logic of the Fed's New Policy Move

2011-09-21T16:51:00.001-04:00

10 Reasons We Are in a Credit Crisis

2011-09-20T11:04:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Yesterday's news was about a potential Greek default and it caused a global market selloff. Today, hopes of preventing a Greek default are causing markets to rally. This alternating news flow is repeating over and over again. Investors should pay attention to the big picture however and not the noise of the day. The important thing to realize is that we are in a second global credit crisis.

Credit crises follow certain patterns, which include: recognition of overpriced financial assets, money flowing into safe havens, increased market volatility, rising costs for financial insurance, and various forms of government action to stop the problem. The specifics of the current credit crisis are below.

1. Government debt is being downgraded. This happened in Italy yesterday, the U.S. in early August and many times in Greece. This is the upfront recognition of the problem, which is almost always widespread public knowledge by the time it happens. In 2008, securitized debt containing subprime real estate loans was downgraded in mass, frequently from the triple A ratings that had previously been given.

2. Global money is flowing into safe haven U.S. treasuries. When yields hit lower levels than a previous credit crisis or all-time lows, this indicates this is happening on a mass scale. U.S. government two-year notes had a yield below 0.15% at one point this September 19th. During 2008, the two-year held above 0.60%. The ten-year yield has fallen below the 2.04% low in 2008 and below the all-time low of 1.95% in 1941.

3. Global money is flowing into safe haven currencies. In 2008, this was the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. In 2010, this is the Japanese yen, the Swiss franc, and gold (which needs to be thought of as a currency if it is to be analyzed correctly). The Swiss franc rallied so much that the Swiss stopped it from trading freely. The Japanese have also taken action to try to lower the value of the yen.

4. Stock market volatility has increased enormously. In 2008, there were a significant number of mini-crashes (a drop of 5% or more in one day). These were more common in the U.S. back then. Now they are more common in Germany, but they have been happening here as well. The flip side of mini-crashes is sudden sharp moves up in the market. These are also occurring.

5. Bank stocks are the focus of the big moves up and down in the stock market. U.S. banks and other financial stocks really got hit in 2008 -- a number of the companies themselves went under. This time it's European banks falling the hardest. One-day drops for some major EU and UK banks have been as high as 10%. Bank stocks aren't dropping that much in the U.S., but they are underperforming other sectors like technology.

6. Credit default swaps have hit record levels. Credit default swaps (CDSs) are bond insurance and they became a big news item in 2008 when they rose to unprecedented levels. While CDS rates for Greek sovereign debt have hit records and are rising for the other highly indebted EU countries, they have also hit records for some UK and EU banks in 2011 indicating a worse crisis than in 2008.

7. Major and ongoing bailouts are taking place. The EU had to bail out Greece in the spring of 2010 and then Ireland and Portugal. A second bailout for Greece had to be arranged this July, even though the first bailout was supposed to have taken care of Greece's debt problem. In 2008, the U.S. had TARP and arranged for failing banks to be taken over by stronger banks (Bank America is now in trouble again because of the legacy loans from the banks it absorbed during this period). Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had to be nationalized.

8. Central banks are buying bonds in the open market. The EU has been buying up Italian, Spanish, Irish and Portuguese bonds in order to hold down interest rates in those countries. As long as it has an infinite access to funds, this strategy will work. The Fed began buying U.S. debt instruments in the fall of 2008 during the Credit Crisis.

9. Global coordinated central bank intervention took place last week. The need for global action is a consequence of the interconnectedness of the world financial system. A major problem in one region (in 2011 this is Europe, in 2008 it was the U.S.) will invariably spread everywhere. Central banks coordinate their activity to try to control the contagion.

10. The global economy is turning down. Problems in the financial system impact the real economy and they can turn a shallow downturn into a major one as has happened in 2008. Economic figures throughout the world have flattened and there are some warnings of a bigger drop to come (extremely low consumer confidence numbers for instance). GDP contraction in a number of regions will be the final confirmation that another global credit crisis has occurred.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Global Markets Slip on Greece

2011-09-19T13:26:00.000-04:00

Central Banks Pump Money to Prop Up Europe

2011-09-16T10:51:00.000-04:00

Exactly three years after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and almost brought down the global financial system, central banks in North America, Europe and Asia engaged in a coordinated money pumping operation to prevent the EU banking system from stalling. The move created a sharp stock market rally, especially in financial shares, just as was the case when similar actions took place during the 2008 Credit Crisis.

Involved in Thursday's action were the U.S. Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan. The purpose was to improve dollar liquidity among European banks struggling because of the Greek debt crisis. The credit markets have frozen up, just as they did after the Lehman bankruptcy, and U.S. banks have been unwilling to lend dollars to European banks. The ECB will now be able to access dollars by swapping assets with the Federal Reserve. It wasn't stated in the announcement what assets were involved, but obviously they are substandard ones that wouldn't be accepted in free market trading. This operation also increases exposure of the U.S. financial system to the new credit crisis in Europe.

Such coordinated money-pumping operations are a sign of desperation on the part of the authorities. They were commonplace after Lehman's bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. They created significant volatility in the stock market back then as they did yesterday. Both the German DAX and the French CAC-40 closed up more than 3%. Troubled banks had huge rallies, with Lloyd's Banking Group up over 7%. In 2008, even greater volatility took place, but the rallies proved time and again to be only temporary. The market ultimately nosedived.

The Friday before the Lehman bankruptcy, the S&P 500 closed at 1251.70. Lehman declared bankruptcy on Monday. At the end of the week, the S&P 500 closed at 1255.00. The day before however, the S&P rallied off of its intraday low of 1133.50 to a close of 1206.51 (that's a 6.4% intraday rally -- an enormous move for an index like the S&P). So, the first week after Lehman's bankruptcy it looked like the market wouldn't be impacted that much. It turned out that the actions of central banks provided investors with a false sense of security however.

By the end of September 2008, the S&P 500 closed at 1166.36. Then at the end of October it was down to 968.75. At the end of November, it had dropped to 896.24. It actually closed higher the last day of December at 903.25, before falling to 825.88 at the end of January. By the close of February, the S&P was trading at 735.08. It finally bottomed at 666.79 on March 6, 2009. All along the way, there were big moves up that coincided with the latest money injections of the central banks.

While mainstream media reports tend to portray the central bank actions and the big rallies they cause as good news for the market, they are actually an indication that more trouble is on the way. All investors have to do is remember what happened just three years ago. Yesterday's central bank action indicates that more volatility and lower stock prices are in our future.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economic Reports Indicate U.S.Economy Heading Down

2011-09-15T11:27:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Default notices on U.S. home mortgages rose 33% in July. Retail sales and food services rose only 0.0% -- adjusted for inflation they were negative. The CPI inflation measure for August came in at 0.4%, almost as high as it was in July. Weekly jobless claims rose again this week, coming in at 428,000. All are pointing to an economy in trouble.

The Great Recession began in the housing market after subprime loans started to default in large numbers in 2007. The U.S. economy will continue to have difficulties until all the excesses are ringed out of house prices. Government policy has instead been geared toward stabilizing the market with temporary fixes. The Federal Reserve instituted a number of programs to funnel money into the mortgage markets to protect the banks that had too much exposure to real estate loans and the Obama administration has created programs like HAMP (Home Affordable Mortgage Program) to lower the foreclosure rate. Banks themselves have avoided or delayed foreclosures as long as possible because they don't want the properties on their books. All the government's efforts have certainly slowed down the rate of foreclosures and that may ultimately be all that they accomplish. A 33% increase of foreclosure notices in July indicates a new wave of foreclosures is likely next year.

Meanwhile, U.S. retail sales are declining if you take inflation into account. Retail sales increased strongly with rising home prices in the first years of the 2000s, but after the housing market turned south they have yet to recover. They have been held up by trillion dollar plus annual federal budget deficits, Federal Reserve money printing, and government stimulus programs including the 'Cash for Clunkers' gift to the auto industry. Despite all of these efforts, retail sales and food services were up 0.0% in July (the same 0.0% for jobs created in August). The mainstream media reported 0.1%, but this is only the retail sales component of the report. The report is not adjusted for inflation, so even if retail sales rose 10% a year, but inflation was also 10%, there would be no actual growth (although that is not the story you would get from mainstream news sources).

Retail sales are crucial for the U.S. economy because they make up approximately 70% of GDP. If they don't grow in real terms (after being adjusted for inflation), it is difficult for the economy to grow. To get a quick read on how the retail sales numbers are being impacted by rising prices all that is necessary is to look at the gasoline sales subcomponent. There is no reason to think Americans are using a lot more gasoline from year to year, if anything less is being used. Yet, year over year gasoline sales are up 20.8%. This is caused by inflation. Retail sales and food services overall were up 7.2% year over year. Adjusted for a realistic inflation rate, this number would be somewhat negative.

That is not to say that the government is reporting an inflation rate that high. The just released CPI for August was 0.4% or 4.8% on an annualized basis. It was 0.5% in July or 6.0% on an annualized basis. Alternative inflation measures from ShadowStats.com indicate actual U.S. inflation is several percentage points higher than the official numbers indicate. ShadowStats.com calculates its inflation numbers the same way the U.S. government did in the 1970s. Since there have been many changes in how U.S. inflation is determined since then, it is not meaningful to compare current numbers to the past ones since doing so is like comparing apples to oranges. The ShadowStats numbers indicate that inflation is much higher now or if you don’t accept that, then you are left with the absurd conclusion that high inflation didn’t exist in the 1970s (you will find that this is the case if you use current methods to recalculate the 1970s inflation numbers).

The other major drag on the U.S. economy -- lack of jobs -- also seems to be getting worse. Weekly claims rose again this week to 428,000. Over 400,000 is considered a recessionary level. With the exception of a few weeks, these have been continually over 400,000 for almost three years now, indicating an ongoing recession (despite all the claims to the contrary of a recovery). The trend is actually worse than it appears however. These numbers should strongly regress toward the mean (move back to the long-term average), but haven't as of yet. As a recession goes on and on eventually everyone that is going to be laid off eventually has been and that should cause this number to decline for statistical reasons even if the economy isn't improving. That it has managed to stay at such high levels for almost three years is truly amazing.

The overall picture provided by U.S. economic reports indicates a flat or declining economy with rising inflation. Little progress seems to have been made in the last three years. The new credit crisis arising in Europe is only going to make matters worse. The U.S. economy was merely weak before Lehman Brothers defaulted, but it fell off a cliff after that.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Debt Crisis -- Greece 2011 Compared to Argentina in 2001

2011-09-14T14:54:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Headlines such as "Hopes for Greek debt progress lift world stocks" and "Wall St opens higher on European hopes" are in the financial news today. Before investors buy into the hype, they should realize that the powers-that-be always deny an obvious and inevitable default before it takes place. Greece in 2011 is on a very similar trajectory to Argentina in 2001 and is well past the point of no return for a default just as Argentina was back then.
There are many similarities between the current Greek debt crisis and the Argentina debt crisis in 2001. Greece is not using its own currency, but a transnational one, while Argentina pegged its currency to the U.S. dollar.  A connnection to a greater currency allows only limited policy responses and prevents the usual money printing that would have take place when debt becomes too high. This in turn causes a gradual rise in inflation up to the point of hyperinflation (Greece and Argentina have both experienced hyperinflation in the past). While skyrocketing interest rates in Greece are implying there is massive inflation, the official inflation rate is under 3%. Yields on one-year Greek governments reached approximately 100% on Tuesday, telling a very different story.

While the Greeks are certainly underestimating their inflation rate (they have been caught lying and continually underreporting their debt figures and no numbers from the Greek Statistical Office can be trusted), it is relatively minor no matter what the actual number. Inflation is caused by a falling currency and hyperinflation by a collapsing currency. Since the euro is not dropping that much and Greece uses the euro, inflation is not showing up there. Argentina tying its currency to the dollar also created a very low inflation rate as long as the peg lasted. There is no free lunch however (even though you may have repeatedly heard that there is from politicians). Profligate government spending eventually leads to major inflation. The inflation only showed up in Argentina after it decoupled its currency from the U.S. dollar and it will show up in Greece after it decouples from the euro. Instead of gradually building inflation, sudden major inflation will take place.
The Argentina crisis began when a new government was elected in December 1999 and had to deal with years of mismanagement from the previous administration. Greece elected a new government in October 2009 and shortly thereafter it revealed that it had a lot more debt and higher budget deficits than it had claimed. In both cases, sharp spending cuts were implemented and serious riots followed. By December 2000, Argentina had acquired bailout funding from the IMF. Markets rallied and press reports indicated everything was going be OK. Greece received its first bailout from the EU and the IMF in the spring of 2010 and markets rallied and press reports indicated that everything was going to be OK.  In both cases everything that followed wasn't going OK.
By the spring of 2001, events started spiraling downward in Argentina. In the spring of 2011, events started spiraling downward in Greece. In August 2001, Argentina received an increase in its standby loan agreement from the IMF. Greece received promises of a second bailout from the EU, but with some mandatory debt swaps as part of the deal. Argentina engaged in debt swaps in June of 2001. Interest payments on Argentina's debt eventually overwhelmed rescue attempts and on December 5, 2001, the IMF announced it would not disburse promised aid to Argentina. A collapse followed shortly thereafter. The EU is now questioning whether or not to continue to make disbursements to Greece. If the disbursements stop at any point, Greece will default shortly thereafter just as Argentina did.

No government is of course going to admit that it is going to default. If it did, no one would purchase its bonds and this would cause an immediate default.  It is not surprising that the Greek government is denying the obvious, EU leaders are grasping at straws to explain how a Greek default will be avoided, or that the mainstream media is trying to spin those straws into a golden fantasy of solvency. Argentina denied that it would default right up to the end as well, just like every other country (and major company) facing the same predicament has in the past. Despite the claims that, "this time is different", it never is.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Interest Rate Spread Widens as Greece Heads Toward Default

2011-09-13T07:36:00.000-04:00

Risks of Market Contagion from a Greek Default

2011-09-12T16:27:00.000-04:00

Why a Greek Default is Imminent

2011-09-12T09:40:00.000-04:00

It may only be weeks, if not days, before Greece defaults on its debts. Interest rates and credit default swaps (bond insurance) have hit record levels and are still climbing. Stocks are getting slammed throughout the word, especially EU bank stocks. The Germans appear ready to abandon further attempts at bailing out the debt-ridden country.

Yields on two-year notes in Greece were above 60% Monday morning -- the highest ever. The yield on the 10-year governments was over 20%. Both rates continue to climb making it more and more difficult for Greece to pay down its enormous pile of debt and requiring larger and larger bailout packages if Greece is to avoid bankruptcy. The market is becoming increasingly skeptical that Greece will survive financially however. The five-year credit default swaps on its government debt were at records highs last Friday and their cost keeps rising as well.

Markets presaged this week's trouble last Friday, with the Dow Industrials down 304 points. Juergen Stark announced he was resigning the ECB's executive board because of its program of buying bonds of the financially troubled EU members. Markets got slammed in Europe and in North America. The damage continued in Asia Sunday night with Hong Kong's Hang Seng down 836 points (4.2%) and the Japanese Nikkei down 202 points (2.3%). Germany and France were down almost at mini-crash levels (a 5% drop in one day) after their Monday opening, but recovered somewhat by the end of the morning. As of last Friday, the German DAX had fallen approximately one-third (33%) from its highs earlier in 2011.

Bank stocks are bearing the brunt of the selloff in EU markets. Major banks such as Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas and Société Générale were down in the 10% range. Outside of Greece, German and French banks are the most exposed to Greek debt. German banks have more exposure to Greek government debt (the debt that wouldn't be paid off in the event of a default), while French banks have more exposure to commercial loans to Greek businesses. Reports indicate that BNP Paribas, Société Générale and Credit Agricole may have their credit ratings lowered by Moody's this week. Credit default swaps on some major European banks are also rising to record high levels.

The Germans appear ready to throw in the towel on the second Greek rescue package. Officials have increasingly been making statements that indicate that Greece must meet its targets for deficit reduction if further bailout payments are to be made. It is highly unlikely this will happen. Nevertheless, the Greek Finance Minister stated over the weekend that Greece was committed to the "full implementation" of the terms of the second bailout. He dismissed rumors of a possible default. Of course, so did the CEOs of Enron and Bear Stearns days before their companies imploded.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing
meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

EU-Centered Credit Crisis Continues

2011-09-07T00:22:00.000-04:00

Is Greece About to Default?

2011-09-02T17:15:00.351-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Yields on two-year Greek governments reach 46.84% last Friday. This is roughly comparable to yields on Argentine bonds in early December 2001 -- only a month before the country defaulted on its debt.

Similar interest rates occurred this spring in Greece before the second bailout package was put together. The bailout saved Greece from defaulting back then, but the bailout is now falling apart while the fiscal situation in Greece continues to deteriorate. The risk of default in the near future has returned, but the will to stop it this time around is much weaker than in the past.

Finland and a number of other countries have already demanded collateral from the Greek government for their contribution to the bailout and this reduces the money available that can be used by the Greek government to pay off its debts. Then talks between the Greek government and the ECB, EU, and IMF broke down last Friday (September 2nd) because Greece admitted it will not meet its deficit reduction and privatization targets for the year. This potentially puts the next $8 billion tranche in bailout payments in jeopardy. The talks are supposed to resume in 10 days. Even more challenges will have to be faced this coming week.

Citizens of the fiscally solvent EU countries are getting tired of paying to support what they see as the profligate spending habits of the EU's weaker economies. The bailout efforts have been lead by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, but support within her country has never been strong for them. Her ruling party has lost six regional elections this year, including one in her own home state this weekend. Any more pro-bailout efforts will only further weaken her politically.

At the same time that efforts are taking place to undermine the second bailout, more and more money is needed by Greece. Like many other heavily-indebted countries in the past, Greece is dealing with a destructive feedback loop of inexorably escalating interest costs that cause its debt to continue to rise regardless of what efforts it makes to control it. The Greek government claimed a debt to GDP ratio of 120% in 2010 during the first bailout talks. It is now estimated to be as high as 160%. Interest payments on that debt could be as high as 24% of GDP at current rates (the 10-year bond is yielding over 18%). Despite the first bailout and now the second bailout, interest rates keep going higher, the national debt keeps getting bigger and the problem keeps getting worse.

Since someone elsewhere had to lend all the money that is in danger of not being paid back, Greek debt problems are not isolated to Greece, but are having a major impact on the big banks in France and Germany (the real reason Germany and France are so anxious to bail out Greece). The debt problem moreover is being spread through contagion to Spain and Italy, both of which are much larger economies and which are ultimately "too big to bail". This is casting a wider net of impacted banks. By the last week of August, credit default swaps (insurance on bonds) were rising to crisis levels for the Royal Bank of Scotland, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo. The problem seems to be a shortage of liquidity, just as was the case in the fall of 2008.

It has also been reported that many European financial institutions have losses on bond holdings, despite the ECB actively supporting Spanish and Italian bond prices . The global banking system has approximately $2 trillion in exposure to Greek, Irish, Portuguese, Spanish and Italian debt. On Monday, the yield premiums on Italian and Spanish 10-year government bonds over the equivalent German Bund hit their highest in a month. Italian bonds traded at 5.5%, well above the 5% rate at which the ECB has been buying recently. Italy has to roll over 62 billion euros in bonds by the end of the month.

Stocks have of course been negatively impacted by the problems in Greece and this will continue until there is some resolution. The German DAX had another mini-crash on Monday, falling 5.28% or 292 points. The drop in Paris was just under the 5% mark that defines a crash day. London held up somewhat better as it has during the entire crisis so far. U.S. markets were closed.

At this point, the only thing that can prevent a default by Greece is if its entire debt is bailed out by the EU and IMF (this would require a third and even fourth bailout package). This is not going to happen. The second bailout itself is highly unlikely to go through as planned. Without it, Greece will default this fall. With it, a little more time will be bought before a third bailout is needed - and support for that measure doesn't currently exist and isn't likely to exist. The important question concerning Greek default seems not to be if, but when.

Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2000s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Recovery Goes Jobless in August

2011-09-02T10:43:00.000-04:00

Manufacturing Goes Flat Throughout the World

2011-09-01T18:45:00.000-04:00

Should Stocks be Rallying on Hopes of QE3?

2011-09-01T07:14:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Stocks have rallied significantly since August 10th on the hopes that the Federal Reserve will engage in a third round of quantitative easing (QE) -- a form of money printing. While QE1 and QE2 were successful in juicing stock prices, this is not what the Fed is supposed to be doing.

The Fed's current mandate was established by the U.S. Congress in 1977 in the Federal Reserve Reform Act. This legislation requires the Fed to establish a monetary policy that "promotes maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates". Manipulating stock prices is not supposed to be on the Fed's agenda. Quantitative Easing was unknown in 1977 and was therefore not specifically addressed by Congress.

If anything,the Fed has significantly overshot in its goal to keep long-term rates moderate. The Fed Funds rate has been kept at around zero percent since December 2008. The Fed has stated it will maintain this rate until 2013. The interest rate on the 10-year treasury fell below 2.00% at one point this August -- a record low. Two-year rates fell below 0.20%, also record lows and well below the bottom rate during the Credit Crisis. Low interest rates indicate an economy in recession and not deflation as is commonly claimed in the mainstream press. Maintaining interest rates at a low level for too long is inflationary however.

The Fed announced its first quantitative easing program in November 2008 (according to an analysis of its balance sheet, it was begun somewhat earlier). The second round ended this June. How has the employment situation changed during the two rounds of QE? When QE1 started in November 2008, the official U.S. unemployment rate was 6.8%. When it ended in June 2011, it was 9.2%. The high was 10.1% in October 2009. The post-World War II average has been 5.7% and unemployment has fallen to the 3% range when the economy is strong. With respect to employment, quantitative easing seems to have been a failure.

So what about price stability, the Fed's other mandate? While the inflationary effects of quantitative easing are most evident in commodity prices, the typical American consumer has seen them in gasoline, food and clothing prices. The average price of gasoline was as low as $1.60 a gallon when the Fed started QE1 and it almost reached $4.00 a gallon during QE2. A number of commodities, including cotton and copper, hit all-time record-high prices during QE2. Gold, the ultimate measure of inflation,rose to one new price high after another. Silver went from under $10 an ounce to over $48 an ounce. Quantitative easing obviously hasn't led to price stability. In fact, it has resulted in much higher prices and is therefore counterproductive to the Fed's goal of limiting inflation.

There is no question that quantitative easing has helped the stock market and resulted in higher stock prices. This is not exactly a secret however and all Wall Street traders are well aware of it. They will therefore push stock prices higher if they think more quantitative easing is on the way and much of any rally that results will occur before it even takes place. Quantitative easing is also no panacea for stock prices. It doesn't insulate the market from external shocks. While it doesn't make crashes more likely, it will make them worse when they occur. A default on Greek, Spanish or Italian debt and any number of other crises will have greater impact than they would have ordinarily because the market has been pumped up to artificially high levels. The market has also become dependent on quantitative easing and has not been able to rally since late 2008 without it. Almost as soon as it stops, the market drops and those drops will become more serious after each succeeding round.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Consumer Confidence Plunges to Deep Recession Levels

2011-08-31T08:19:00.000-04:00

A Twisted Tale of Gold Stolen Almost 80 Years Ago

2011-08-30T14:26:00.001-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Apparently the government can keep property stolen from you, but you can't keep property stolen from the government. A recent Bloomberg Businessweek article entitled "Gold Coins: The Mystery of the Double Eagle" details how the Secret Service has spent almost 80 years trying to track down 1933 Double Eagle $20 gold coins missing from the Philadelphia Mint. It is well-known however who stole millions of dollars of gold from the American public in the same year - and since it was the U.S. government, lot's of luck in getting compensation.

The 1933 Double Eagle never went into circulation. All coins were ordered to be melted down because U.S. citizens were banned from owning gold in the same year. Moreover, the Roosevelt Administration confiscated all gold and paid gold holders $20.67 per ounce. Those who failed to turn their gold in were subject to a 10 year jail sentence - more time than some violent criminals got - and a $10,000 fine. Once the government had the citizenry's gold, it raised the price to $35.00 an ounce or 41% higher. The price difference represents the value of personal property stolen by the government.

Sensibly, some people sued the federal government claiming the gold seizure was unconstitutional. After all, the U.S. Constitution clearly protects property rights of Americans - if it is enforced that is. Moreover, the Roosevelt Administration claimed it was given authority to seize everyone's gold through a World War I law that gave the government sweeping powers to seize personal property to protect the Republic during wartime. There was of course, no war in 1933.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court, in one of its most absurd rulings of all time, ruled the gold seizure perfectly legal. Even today, the mainstream press continues to soft peddle this trashing of the U.S. Constitution. The Bloomberg Businessweek article states that Roosevelt's Executive Order 6102, "prohibited the hoarding of gold", rather than the owning of gold. While the gold was taken long ago, the same propaganda from the 1930s seems to still be with us.

Apparently also in 1933 at least one employee at the Philadelphia Mint smuggled out some Double Gold Eagles. The government was unaware of this however. Around 1937, a Philadelphia coin dealer offered some Double Gold Eagles for sale. One of them, after being purchased by another coin dealer, was sold to King Farouk of Egypt. Unbeknownst to the Secret Service, the Secretary of the Treasury's office issued an export license for this coin on Feb. 29, 1944.

This was only one of many things that took place at Treasury that the Secret Service knew nothing about. Not stated in the Bloomberg Businessweek article was that the Under-Secretary of the Treasury at the time, Harry Dexter White, was the most highly placed Soviet agent in the U.S. government. This inconvenient, but well-documented truth has been covered up or minimized by left-wing historians and reporters for decades. White began working for the Roosevelt Administration in 1934 and concentrated on the relationship of gold and silver to currency management. The U.S. federal government confiscated American's private silver holdings in 1934.

The Secret Service arranged an elaborate sting operation in 1996 to eventually get the Farouk gold coin back. Thank goodness they didn't waste their time investigating Bernie Madoff while he was in the process of ripping off the public in his record breaking $65 billion Ponzi scheme. Eventually, after being seized from a British subject who had bought it, this coin was sold at auction and the proceeds were split between him and the U.S. government. Recently more coins have surfaced in the United States and the government has simply confiscated them -- something it is very good at doing when it comes to gold.

That the U.S. government claims rights through perpetuity and across national borders for its property, but unconstitutionally denies them to its own citizens is the major issue in the Bloomberg Businessweek article (one they seem to have missed entirely), but not the only one. Other than the dangerous precedent of property rights for the average person being trashed, the article brings up the point that the federal government is unaware that gold is stolen from its storehouses and the government wastes its time on pursuing trivial matters on its behalf while ignoring major economic crimes involving billions or even trillions of dollars. Fort Knox hasn't been audited since 1954. How much of the gold is still there? What other major Ponzi schemes and frauds are taking place while government agents spend their time tracking down gold coins from 1933?

Disclosure: Do not own any 1933 gold coins.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

July Consumer Spending - Reports of Its Health Greatly Exaggerated

2011-08-29T13:13:00.000-04:00

Bernanke in a Hole in Jackson as Wall Street Evacuates

2011-08-26T17:54:00.000-04:00

Guide to Interpreting U.S. GDP Figures

2011-08-26T11:03:00.000-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

An update for second quarter GDP figures were released today and growth was revised downward to 1.0% from the initial reading of 1.3%. There will be another revision next month and then further revisions each year in late July or early August. Expect the numbers to get worse as time goes on.

Media attention is not equally distributed to all the versions of the same GDP report. The most attention goes to the first release called the Advance Report. These have tended to be highly optimistic since the Credit Crisis began. The Second and Third Reports that follow (also known as the Preliminary and Final Reports) get slightly less attention, although these are almost always within the same ballpark. The big revisions come in the yearly updates in July and while these can be devastatingly bad, little attention is paid to them by the mainstream media. Nor is the information provided in them used by the mainstream media to interpret current data. The primary reason for this is that the mainstream media rarely interprets government statistics at all no matter how absurd and ridiculous they are. Instead, they mindlessly repeat them in a parrot-like fashion. The public then thinks it's getting real news when it isn't.

On July 29, 2011, the BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis) revised the GDP figures back to 2006 and stated that GDP growth in Q1 2011 had only been 0.4% instead of 1.9%. There was some comment attached to this report about how seasonal adjustments had inaccurately overstated the numbers. It would be logical to think that such overstatements would be happening in Q2 as well and that these will not be corrected by the BEA until the revision in July 2012. Looking at changes made to the GDP numbers in the last few years certainly provides more than enough reason to believe that the BEA provides the best news possible when the media pays the most attention and the worst news when no one is looking.

The history of the GDP for Q4 2008, the quarter when the Credit Crisis was at its worse, provides a good example of how the government reports GDP. The first report out was a reading of -4.0% -- a bad enough reading, but much better than what was really taking place. After many revisions downward, the BEA this July said the GDP had actually changed by -8.9%. This is an absolute error of almost 5.0%. If the BEA states quarterly growth is +3.0%, you may wish to ponder if it was really
-2.0% instead, but you won't be hearing about the difference until years later. One is normal healthy growth and the other indicates a recession.

The year over year GDP figures can have even bigger errors. The difference from Q4 2007 and Q4 2008 originally indicated 3.3% GDP growth (during the worst recession since the Great Depression, this pigs-can-fly number went unquestioned by the media), but by the July 2011 revision a GDP decline of 3.3% was admitted. This is more than a 6.0% absolute difference. You might want to consider subtracting 6% from any year over year GDP number that the government provides.

The GDP figures produced by the BEA can be highly unreliable and yet the mainstream media doesn't discuss this, nor does it warn investors about it in its reporting. When hearing the news about GDP growth being a passable 2% to 3%, you should assume it might barely be positive or even somewhat negative. For reports like the recent ones that indicate growth of 1% or less, you should assume the economy is noticeably contracting. The BEA will not admit these discrepancies until well into the future however. You can also assume other statistical manipulations being used to overstate GDP won't be admitted at all.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

German Flash Crash Shows Vulnerability of the Market

2011-08-25T14:27:00.000-04:00

Economists Don't See The Recession That Has Already Started

2011-08-23T07:22:00.001-04:00

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

A just released survey of 43 mainstream economists polled this month by the AP pegs the chances of the U.S. falling into recession in the next year at only 26% (one in four). As a group, the economists predict the economy will expand by over 2% in the second half of the year. Other news that appeared with the survey results included an article about how food stamp use in the U.S. is skyrocketing - a highly unlikely occurrence during an economic recovery.

When deciding how much credence should be given to the current recession view of the economics profession, investors should consider how accurately they predicted the Great Recession - the worst one since the 1930s. The recession began in December 2007. That same month a survey of 54 mainstream economist was published by Business Week under the title, "A Slower But Steady Economy" (AP could have used the same title for its current survey). How many of these highly-paid top economists realized that the U.S. was in recession? None, zero, nada, zilch. How many thought that the U.S. was about to experience the worst recession in almost 80 years? None, zero, nada, zilch.
Unless you have reason to believe that establishment economists have been regularly taking handfuls of smart pills in the last three years, it's unlikely that their views are any more accurate today.

Instead of listening to the miss-opinion of mainstream economists constantly being shoveled out by the mainstream media, investors would be wise to look at the hard evidence of what is actually taking place in the economy. Approximately 46 million Americans (15% of the population) are on food stamps. The number has increased by 74% since 2007. One wonders how big the increase would have been without the economic "recovery" that has supposedly taken place. Many of the people who receive food stamps are employed part-time and sometimes full-time in low paying jobs. If so, they are not part of the unemployment statistics and are considered successful examples of the U.S. pulling itself out of recession.

Of course having a large part of the country on food-aid is an expensive proposition. How exactly has the U.S. paid for this? Well, one way is through the approximately $2 trillion in money that the Federal Reserve has printed since 2007. Two trillion dollars of phony money can really juice up an economy. Without it, the GDP would still be in a deep hole from its 2007 levels and the illusion of economic recovery wouldn't exist. If it turns there's no free lunch after all, the U.S. is going to be hit with a very big inflation bill in the future. Don't expect Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to see this coming though. After all, the Fed remained oblivious to the Great Recession long after it had started. Even in the spring of 2008, their meeting notes indicate that they were still hopeful about avoiding the recession that had begun months before.

Investors should expect an ongoing stream of articles in the next several weeks or even months about how the U.S. is not going to experience another recession. The stock market is sending a very different message though and even the fluffed up economic statistics the government produces are likely to look a bit anemic this fall. But don't worry, establishment economists are optimistic as they always are when a recession begins.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security. Investing is risky and if you don't think you are capable of doing it yourself, seek professional advice.