First Quarter GDP: A Look Inside the Numbers

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The advance report for first quarter GDP was out today and it indicated that the U.S. economy expanded by 3.2%. Approximately half of that was due to increases in business inventories. Business equipment and software investment supposedly went up over 13% and was the biggest sub-category gainer. Consumer expenditures somehow went up 3.6% even though real disposable income was flat. Increases in federal government spending helped raise the numbers.

While the biggest contribution to the report was in the inventory category, this represented a lower percent than in the fourth quarter of 2009. Inventories added 3.8% of the 5.6% increase in GDP last quarter, or two-thirds of the total. Inventories didn't actually increase in the fourth quarter either; they dropped by $19.7 billion. Thanks to the peculiarities of GDP math, the slower rate of decline led to a big increase in GDP.  Mainstream media then reported this turn of events as the U.S. economy being on fire (if they meant it was burning down, they may have been correct). In Q1, inventories actually increased though by $31.1 billion. This is certainly more positive, but inventory restocking by itself doesn't indicate a recovering economy. It does however lead to a recovery in the GDP number.

The increase in business equipment and software of 13.4% in Q1 was less than the also very high 19.0% last quarter. Overall this led to nonresidential fixed investment increasing 4.1% in the current quarter even though investments in nonresidential structures (commercial buildings) declined 14.0%. Still, that was better than the 18.0% drop in Q4 of last year. Real residential fixed investment  (housing) decreased 10.9% this quarter, in contrast to a supposed increase of 3.8% in the fourth quarter of 2009. Real estate, which was the epicenter of the Credit Crisis and the damage to the economy, is obviously still troubled. How can there be recovery under such circumstances?

When reporting on first quarter GDP, big media highlighted the consumer spending numbers. The 3.6% current number was much higher than the 1.6% number at the end of last year. Durable goods sales supposedly increased 11.3% in Q1 compared to just 0.4% in Q4 2009. Motor vehicles created a 0.52% growth in GDP by themselves. Nondurable goods were up 3.9% compared to 4.0% last quarter, so almost all of the big change took place in durable goods. U.S. consumers managed to increase their spending on these high-ticket items even though real disposable income didn't go up. Consumer credit was also declining in the first quarter. Revolving credit (credit cards) fell at a 13% annual rate in February. So somehow consumers are now spending more money even though they don't have the funds available from their income or credit. That certainly is interesting.
 
Finally, government spending, which has been the mainstay of the economy for the last two years, increased by 1.4% in the first quarter compared to no change in the last quarter of 2009. Nondefense spending increased 1.7 percent in the beginning of 2010 and this compares to a jump of 8.3% at the end of last year. State and local spending were down in both quarters. At this point it will be hard for the federal government to increase its spending from current levels, so decreases are likely in the future and this will be a drag on GDP going forward. What part of the economy will pick up the slack? Well, I guess that depends on what numbers the statisticians find easiest to manipulate.

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Fed Will Leave Rates at Zero Until Inflation Shows Up

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Federal Reserve left the fed funds rate in the zero to 0.25% range at its April meeting. This is the 16th month that the Fed has maintained rates at an all-time low. While the Fed was a bit more upbeat about the economy than it has been at recent meetings, it still pledged to keep rates near zero "for an extended period of time".

When it comes to the Fed and other government representatives, investors would be best off by paying attention to what they do and not to what they say. The Fed was certainly more upbeat in its statement from the April meeting than it was in previous meetings. It noted that "economic activity has continued to strengthen and that the labor market is beginning to improve","growth in household spending has picked up recently" and  "business spending on equipment and software has risen significantly". You would think happy days were here again and short-term rates will be 5% before you know it. Well maybe not, it turns out.

While strong economic growth leads to inflation, apparantly there is no risk of that (inflation that is) as far as the Fed is concerned. The Fed went on to say that "with substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to be subdued for some time". So the Fed seems to be talking out of both sides of its mouth. Either growth is not sustainable in the long-run and it thinks this will keep inflation subdued or the Fed has pumped so much money into the financial system that this is creating economic expansion (at least for the moment) and inflation will follow.

The first scenario was seen in Japan during the last two decades, especially after its two-year recession in the early 1990s. The economy was supposedly recovering nicely without inflation for a few years. Instead, it gradually fell into the abyss and a deflationary spiral. In the second case, uncontrollable inflation is possible - and this can take place with a great deal of resource slack. Rapidly declining and eventual collapse of resource utilization is the marker of hyperinflation. Fed chair Bernanke should tell Zimbabwe that it couldn't have possibly had the second highest inflation rate in world history, sextillion percent, because it had an unemployment rate of 94%. Weimar Germany, with a mere 100 trillion percent inflation rate, had unemployment that reached almost 25%.

The Fed statement also had two telling comments that provide significant insight in the Fed's thinking. These were, "financial market conditions remain supportive of economic growth" and "bank lending continues to contract". Taken together these indicate that the financial conditions that are supportive are the Fed's low interest rates and the high prices of stocks - the paper economy. While the paper economy is going great, as indeed it was before the Credit Crisis and during every other bubble in history, the real economy is struggling. It can't function well without adequate credit from banks. In other words, the Fed's positive view of the economy is based on economic make believe.

If the Fed really believed the economy was improving, it would be raising rates or at least getting ready to do so and not say it was maintaining its ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) for a long time. As I have documented in previous articles, there is usually a two to three year lag from the end of a recession until the Fed starts raising rates. If we assume optimistically that the recession ended in July 2009, that would take us until at least July 2011 before rates went up. Any rate rise before that date would indicate significant inflation risk and a rate rise after July 2012 would indicate a serious deflation problem.  In either case, the Fed's response will be too little, too late.

Disclosure: None Relevant

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

It's De Facto Default for Greece

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The debt crisis in Greece looks like it is finally going to be resolved now that an S&P downgrade of the country's debt to junk status on April 27th has brought the crisis to a head. The eurozone leadership will finally have to stop its denial and provide Greece with funding to roll over its debts. Calm will be then be restored to the markets - at least for a while.

The inept handling of the situation in Greece seems reminiscent of the U.S. government's refusal to bail out Lehman Brothers. That act of political obliviousness led to a crash of the entire world financial system. Greece will have some sort of bailout however, so the more apt analogy would perhaps be the collapse of Bear Stearns. The markets were calmed when the U.S. Fed and Treasury arranged for JP Morgan to buy Bear Stearns at a fire sale price. If they were handling the Greek debt crisis, they probably would have solved it by having Goldman Sachs purchase the country at a 90% discount. Because of the brokered deal by the feds, Bear Stearns never officially went under, although in reality it did because it was no longer capable of independently functioning. If some bailout program is necessary to roll over Greece's government debt or allow it to make interest payments on it, Greece has for all intensive purposes defaulted.

The reaction of the euro zone leadership to Greece's problems seem inexplicable to anyone from the outside. It is definitely a shoot yourself in the foot to punish the other guy approach. A potential bailout for Greece is very unpopular among the electorate in Germany and there will be regional elections there on May 9th. It's the Germans that have been holding up the aid package. German banks have an estimated $45 billion in exposure to Greek debt (France is even higher, holding $75 billion in Greek loans), so an official Greek default would potentially cost Germany more than a bailout. Almost all of Greece's debt is held outside the country and the rest of the eurozone is heavily exposed. It's enough to make you wonder if big banks anywhere in the world ever apply any credit standards to their loans.

The market disaster yesterday seems to have woken the EU from its comatose state of deep denial and fast-tracked handling of a Greek aid package. The euro (FXE) hit a new yearly low of 131.63 and looks like its may have taken out a possible triple bottom. Stocks got hammered on bourses across the continent. Greece itself was down 6.7% and it reacted by instituting a two-month ban on short selling (the U.S. did the same for financial stocks after Lehman collapsed).  Portugal, which had its credit downgraded two notches by S&P, dropped 5.4% and is getting hit hard again today. Italian stocks suffered similar damage. The CAC-40 in France, the Dax in Germany and the FTSE in the UK fell 3.8%, 2.7% and 2.6% respectively. Five-year credit default swaps (CDSs) reached 840 basis points for Greek debt, 430 basis points for Portuguese debt, 270 basis points for Irish debt and 225 points on Spanish debt. The spread between German 10-year governments and equivalent Greek debt rose to 9.63%. Interest rates on two-year Greek governments rose to 18%.

When the EU created the euro currency union, it didn't plan on how to handle debt crises in member states. This was the case even though it allowed some countries with checkered fiscal pasts to become part of the eurozone.  EU leadership (or more appropriately lack thereof) has continued to avoid this issue throughout the entire Greek debt crisis so far. The obvious solution of using dollarization - letting a country continue to use the euro, but not be a part of the credit union - has seemingly not occurred to them. Instead, the tried and true bailout solution will once again by utilized. As became evident in the U.S. during the Credit Crisis, one bailout is never enough. There is already talk about raising the Greek loan guarantees from the EU and IMF from 45 billion euros to 100 to 120 billion euros and extending them over a three-year period. This bailout for Greece will likely just be just one of many and Greece itself will just be the first country to be bailed out.

EFTs that are useful for trading the current crisis in Europe include: EZU (euro monetary union), GUR (emerging Europe), VGK (European stocks), EWI (Italy) and EWP (Spain).

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Ford Still Financially Troubled Despite Q1 Earnings

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Debt ridden Ford Motor earned $2.1 billion in the first quarter or 50 cents a share. Mainstream media reported this as "another sign the economy is improving as people spend more on big-ticket items like cars". Unstated was which economy was improving or that those people were in China. Nor did any report mention that Ford stock has a negative book value of minus $2.32 per share.

What struck me immediately about Ford's 2010 Q1 earnings report was a major inconsistency with the Q1 earnings report for 2009. Ford lost $1.4 billion, or 60 cents per share in the same period last year. This implies that there were 2.3 billion shares outstanding twelve months ago. Based on today's earnings numbers there appear to be 4.2 billion shares outstanding. Ford did issue an additional 300 million plus shares of stock last May and exchanged $4.3 billion in convertible debt for 468 million shares of common stock in the first half of 2009. News reports in May 2009 indicated it had 2.9 billion shares outstanding before the new stock was sold. Today, Ford supposedly has 3.4 billion shares of stock. Off hand, I would say these numbers don't appear to match up.

It is quite amazing that Ford did not sink into bankruptcy, as did General Motors and Chrysler. From 2006 to the first quarter of 2009, the company lost $31.4 billion. Actions taken by Ford in 2009 though are helping the bottom line today. The new shares it issued at the time were used to fund VEBA, the UAW run health car trust, and this saved the company from using real money for this purpose. Ford also worked out an agreement with the UAW that allowed it to lower its labor costs by $500 million annually. At the same time, Ford managed to lower its interest payments on its substantial debt by $500 million a year with its debt to stock conversion. Fortunately for the company, Ford is making a good share of its profits from its credit unit (not from selling cars), which earned a net profit of $528 million in the first quarter of 2010. Ford has the Fed's zero interest rate policy to thank for that.

As for sales, there was a huge increase - in China. Ford reported an 84 percent improvement there. As for North America, U.S. sales did climb 37 percent over last years exceptionally low levels. Part of this is due to Ford's market share rising nearly three percentage points thanks to problems at Toyota. Total U.S. auto sales in 2009 came in at 10.4 million, down from over 16 million before the recession began. Ford still sees sales in the 11.5 to 12.5 million range for 2010. This is still substantially below pre-recession levels. Investors should also ask themselves how much of those extra sales are due to federal government policy. If this is a recovery, it's not much of one. 

Ford (F) stock was down more that 9% on its earnings announcement in morning trade. It fell as low as $13.15. That's still a pretty high stock price for a company with a negative book value.

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Greek Debt Crisis: Why Not Try Dollarization?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Like a thousand page novel that never gets to the climax, the Greek debt crisis is still dragging on. Terms have yet to be worked out for the aid package from the EU and IMF and the Germans seem hesitant about providing it. The market reacted by pushing yields on two-year Greek bonds above 13% today. Even with the proposed aid, Greece's debt problem will merely be put on hold until next year and not solved.

Greece is only 2% of the EU economy, yet its debt crisis has had outsized impact on global markets. Funds have flowed out of Europe into North America and Asia because of it. This has particularly benefited the U.S. and Canadian dollars and weakened the euro. Constant talk about the potential collapse of the euro currency union has accompanied these moves. This has happened not just because of Greece, but also because of looming problems in Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy.

There have been suggestions that Greece leave the euro currency union, at least temporarily, and start reusing the drachma. This would be more than disruptive to say the least. I have seen no one recommend the obvious solution of dollarization. This doesn't mean Greece would use U.S. dollars; it would still use the euro, but not as a member of  the currency union. Dollarization is the generic term for when one country uses another country's currency. Panama and Ecuador for instance use American dollars as their official currency, although neither is part of a currency union with the United States. In early 2009, Zimbabwe dealt with its hyperinflation problem by allowing foreign currencies to be used in the country. One of those currencies was the euro.

The EU should consider handling the problem with Greece by temporarily suspending it from the currency union with the understanding it would still be using the euro. Greece could rejoin when its debt problems were finally resolved. This of course might not be soon. At some point a country accumulates so much debt that default becomes inevitable. That point differs for every country. Greece looks like its already gotten to that state with its debt to GDP ratio over 100%. The debt to GDP ratio for Japan is going to be over 200% though this year and it is still functioning better than Greece. Japan has its own currency though and can therefore print any amount of extra money if need be. It has funded its spending internally by borrowing the massive savings of its people. That game is over however and the situation there could eventually turn ugly almost overnight as occurred in Greece.

While Greek bond interest rates and spreads are hitting new highs, the euro itself is trying to stabilize. A look at its chart shows that it has so far made a triple bottom in late March, early April and mid-April trading. Traders are obviously getting bored with selling the euro down and the currency will be due for a rebound soon. How long that lasts depends on how the EU handles its member countries ongoing debt problems. So far, it's been only an unending number of promises with no results out of Brussels.

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Greek Tragedy Moves Closer to Final Act

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Greece has finally requested an activation of a proposed EU-IMF $60 billion aid package. Negotiations on the terms will be taking place over the next several days. Currently it looks like Greece will be loaned the money at a five percent interest rate. This is more likely to delay default rather than prevent it.

Events on April 22nd finally forced Greece's hand. Moody's downgraded its sovereign debt to A3 from A2 and placed it on credit watch for a possible further downgrade. At almost the same time, the EU Statistical Agency revised Greece's 2009 budget deficit as a percentage of GDP to 13.6% from a previous estimate of 12.7%. The markets reacted negatively with yields on 10-year Greek government bonds rising to 8.7%. Spreads between Greek and German debt rose to 5.6%. Credit default swaps, which are bond insurance, rose to a very high 650 basis points. The euro (FXE) hit a fresh 11-month low of 132.55 against the U.S. dollar.

How much will loan support from the EU and IMF really help Greece though?  The aid package provides enough money to tide Greece over into some time in 2011. Greece has not been having trouble borrowing money, but the trouble is paying high interest rates on the money its borrows. Would 5% be low enough to not seriously threaten Greece's attempt to reduce its budget deficit?  The answer is probably not. Greece, like many countries before it, has entered a downward spiral where debt default becomes inevitable without massive ongoing bailouts. Attempts to balance its budget will severely damage its economy, which is heavily dependent on government spending (as is the case for many other countries including the United States). As it cuts spending and raises taxes to reduce its budget deficit, its GDP will also decrease. A lower nominal budget deficit with lower GDP, means the percentage of the budget deficit to GDP may not decline that much despite extensive efforts to make it happen.

While it looks like Greece's problems happened overnight, they did not. Greece made efforts to hide its fiscal problems for at least a decade. Its most recent endeavors included simply lying about its budget numbers. The fibs it told were so outrageous that if Greece had been Pinocchio, its nose would have stretched across the Mediterranean. Nevertheless, the EU Statistical Agency accepted them without question. It was Greece itself that revealed the scam as it was falling apart. Pervasive lying with statistics is a common last phase before a fiscal collapse. Americans may want to take a close look at the GDP, inflation, and employment numbers produced by the U.S. government as they ponder this thought.

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why Popular Market Indicators May be Giving False Signals

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Market indicators based on percent of stocks above their 50-day moving average and the number of advancing versus declining stocks are flashing bullish buy signals. While these have supposedly worked well in the past, the underlying conditions that led to their success may not exist in today's market. If so, these indicators could be dangerously misleading.

Ned Davis from Ned Davis Research has recently declared the market is experiencing a 'breadth thrust'. This takes place when more than 90% of stocks are trading over their 50-day moving average. This indicates extreme bullishness in the market. This indicator could be a valuable buy signal to investors if it takes place after a significant market low. The indicator did indeed give a buy signal on May 4, 2009 and again on September 16, 2009. The returns have been considerable from these buys. Another buy signal was given on April 5, 2010. After more than a year of rallying and the Dow Jones Industrial Average up around 70% from low to high, this signal is now more likely to indicate a seriously overbought market with few investors left to buy. This indicator has only flashed 12 buy signals since 1967, three of which took place within the past year. The good returns from the two signals in 2009 have in all likelihood made the overall profit potential of following this indicator look a lot better than it was previously and this should be taken into account when examining claims as to this indicators past performance.

Dan Sullivan from The Chartist is also bullish. He bases his outlook on advances versus declines in the market being greater than two to one. His indicator gave three buy signals in 2009. There have only been 18 such buy signals in the last 60 years. The only other years with multiple buy signals were 1962, 1975 and 1982. The Dow was down 11% in 1962. As for 1975, it followed a major two-year bear market in 1973 and 1974 that almost cut the Dow in half. The Dow rose 32% in 1975 and closed at 852. Six years later in 1981, it ended the year at 875 or an additional 3% higher. In 1982, an 18-year secular bull market began, so this was a good call. However, what made it a good call was the market finally broke out after going sideways and down for 16 years. The most analogous situation to today's rally was 1975. The Dow should have rallied in 2009 from its deeply oversold condition and it has, but that rally can't be infinite.

Investors should not blindly follow market indicators, especially when media reports usually give information that is limited to only what is taking place right now. To accurately decide the value of a current buy or sell signal, it is necessary to know how and why it worked in the past. Close examination may indicate the indicator didn't work as well as claimed or that it works only under certain conditions like the Fed lowering interest rates or immediately after a major sell off. As is always the case, investors who want to make money in the markets need to think for themselves.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.