Swine Flu Update - Government Scamdemic and the Credit Crisis

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If you thought the U.S. government's handling of the Credit Crisis was bad (and you should), the handling of the current swine flu outbreak is even worse. Both have similar elements and it is those elements that need to be addressed if the financial system is to be righted, the economy is to be put back on a sustainable track, health policy is to be handled responsibly and anything else is in the U.S. is to run the way it should. Otherwise things are only going to continue to fall apart and possibly just blow up spectacularly one day.

We are living in a time where there seems to have been a complete suspension of the use of common sense and basic logic among the powers that be. You see this in the Credit Crisis, where it was believed that people who had no jobs and no history of paying their bills, even if they had a job, were considered good prospects for home mortgages. Somehow, there was surprise when large numbers of these mortgages defaulted. Government programs to extend home ownership to the poor (why should someone not own something just because they can't afford it) were at the root of the Credit Crisis and this helped support unlimited Wall Street greed in trying to make money off of these programs. The government is still trying to prop up Wall Street with your taxpayer money in its various bail out programs even though most of this mortgage debt is and always will be worthless.

The same suspension of common sense has taken place with the current swine flu outbreak. A genetic analysis of the virus released yesterday indicates that it doesn't have any elements of the 1918 virus that caused that virus be so dangerous (plus that virus was an avian flu and not a swine flu as was thought to be the case for decades, a rather major point that seems to have been ignored by the medical authorities). Instead of spending tens of thousands of dollars for this study, simple observation of the people with confirmed cases of the disease was all that was necessary. Outside of Mexico, there have been ZERO deaths so far (the one case supposedly in the United States was a resident of Mexico City who had been brought to the U.S. and he had other significant health problems). Anecdotal reports outside of Mexico indicate that many of the people who have had swine flu didn't even bother going to the doctor because they weren't that sick. Most people with swine flu have recovered quickly. If basic logic wasn't enough, you would think having the scientific confirmation that swine flu isn't deadly would be an adequate reason to stop the government's panic reaction to the situation. You would of course be wrong.

From the top all the way down, the government's desire to spend your tax dollars ($1.5 billion has been committed) to save you from a non-existent menace goes on unabated. President Obama himself in his radio address Saturday stated, "This is a new strain of the flu virus, and because we haven't developed an immunity to it, it has more potential to cause us harm. Unlike the various strains of animal flu that have emerged in the past, it's a flu that is spreading from human to human." The ability to pack so much ignorance in so few words is truly a gift (I previously thought George Bush was the master of this art). Flu arises from animals and becomes epidemic when person to person transmission is possible, so this is exactly what has happened in all past flu epidemics. The idea we have no developed immunity to the swine flu is not supported by the mildness of the cases, nor for that matter has there been any random testing to find out if people test positive for swine flu, but didn't become ill (this was indeed found to be the case in the 1976 outbreak).

Neither common sense, nor scientific evidence seems to have phased Dr. Steve Waterman, the head of a team from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Mexico. Even after getting the genetic analysis stating the swine flu virus wasn't deadly, Dr. Waterman warned that more deaths were to come. Dr. Waterman stated his main goal of his CDC team in Mexico (other than to spend the unlimited government funding they have) is to find out HOW swine flu kills. He should be asking IF it kills, not how. Anyone with a wit of intelligence (it is quite possible that no high ranking medical official is in that category) should be immediately suspicious that no one has died of swine flu outside of Mexico. Many days ago, the official Mexican figures were 2498 swine flu cases and 160 deaths. As of right now, viral typing (the only way to accurately know if someone has swine flu, since there are many other diseases with similar symptoms) shows only 397 confirmed swine flu cases in Mexico with 16 of those people having died. There are no medical histories for those people (most of whom seem to be urban and rural poor with limited access to health care), so it is impossible to determine if they died from swine flu or some other disease. There is by no means out of the question, especially since there was an outbreak of virulent pneumonia this winter in Mexico prior to the outbreak of swine flu. To say that Mexican health statistics are questionable and their health care system is a mess would be an understatement to say the least. Yet, they are being given credence while the more reliable evidence from the developed world is being ignored.

As of today (Saturday, May 2), there are 161 confirmed cases of swine flu in the U.S. New York leads the way with 50 cases. Few new cases seem to be appearing in New York even though the head of the city's Health and Human Services irresponsibly tried to panic the public earlier in the week by warning there were already hundreds of cases (so where are they?). More than 430 schools are closed in the U.S. affecting about 245,000 children in 18 states. Has the U.S. Secretary of Education said this is ridiculous and there is no justification for this. Not at all. Even after the scientific study indicating swine flu is not deadly was available, new guidelines were released to keep schools closed 14 days instead of the shorter times that had been planned. How else could we prepare today's students for future government service other than to keep them totally ignorant and uneducated?

Like the boy who cried wolf, the government is playing a dangerous game with swine flu. When a truly serious crisis arises, it is likely to be ignored in the future. Of course, that would assume that the goverment would actually realize a serious crisis existed. It didn't with the Credit Crisis and it still isn't reacting properly to fix it. Don't assume things are likely to be any better in the health arena.

NEXT: Pandemic of Government Stupidity Over Swine Flu Sweeps Globe

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Government Thinks It Knows Best, Market Disagrees

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If the Obama administration is trying to crash the U.S. stock market they are doing an excellent job. If not, they should all take a class in PR 101. The U.S. government announced that it is displeased with the progress the automakers have made with their restructuring plans (like somehow the government knows how to run an auto company), got the CEO of GM to resign, and is threatening to withhold bailout money from them and force them into bankruptcy. This would be devastating to the economies of the politically important swing states of Michigan and Ohio and for this reason it is not likely to happen. Nevertheless, all investors are paying this morning for this political cat and mouse game, with both the Dow and Nasdaq selling off around 4% as I write this. A crash level drop of 5% is a real possibility at the moment.

When the automakers received their first bailout in the fall, this blog stated it was only a stopgap measure to tide them over until after the election and a new bailout would be needed then. This has indeed happened right on schedule. While we constantly say, there is no such thing as a single bailout for an insolvent financial institution, the same is obviously true in many other industries as well. There is also no question that the automakers have been some of the worse run companies in the U.S. for decades, at least until the banks and brokers took the lead in this respect in the 2000s. Bailouts almost always have long term negative consequences, but this has not stopped the U.S. from establishing a de facto 'too big to fail policy' and it now seems to be moving toward state directed corporate socialism. Government management is an oxymoron if ever there was one. This is out of the frying pan into the fire economics.

Also weighing on the market is the upcoming G20 summit. Other countries, being led by Germany, are not interested in printing an endless stream of new money for economic stimulus plans and the BRIC countries want an alternative reserve currency. A coordinated policy for global stimulus is not likely to result from the meeting later this week as was hoped for by the Obama administration. This leaves the U.S. and Britain, the big money printers, holding the bag. Consequently, both are likely to have to print more money in the future. The BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries want to establish a new reserve currency, at first consisting of a blend of dollars, euros, yen and pounds. No immediate policy shift will officially take place at the summit, but this likely represents a sea change in international currency policy. Both pieces of news are devastating for the U.S. dollar, which somehow ignored reality this morning and rallied strongly.

While it would be nice to do so, investors can't ignore politics. Deep down, there is really very little difference in a number of respects from the current administration and the last administration. Spending huge amounts of taxpayer money on bailouts was and is part of the agenda. If the spending can't fully be funded with taxpayer money (and this was a reality from the beginning), any amount of money necessary will be printed to cover the costs. The dollar will eventually lose a lot of its value because of this and there will be a lot of inflation. The Bush administration though was at least aware of the sensitivities of the stock market, while the Obama administration seems oblivious at best. The drop this morning, taking place during a nascent rally, is not the first time the current administration has stuck its foot in it and it probably won't be the last.

NEXT: Next Few Trading Days Are Important

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Budget Deficit Screams Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Obama administration released revised estimates for the 2009 budget deficit (the difference between the yearly income and spending of the federal government) today and it now looks like it will come in at $1.75 trillion. The original estimate for the 2009 deficit made by the Bush administration in February 2008 was $407 billion. Yes, the current estimate is now more than four times the original one... and we're not done yet. For a perspective of just how huge this number is, the largest U.S. budget deficit so far according to official figures was in 2004 and it was $413 billion. The current estimate represents over 12% of GDP (the overstated official number), approximately equal to the percentage in the World War II year 1942. As bad as a$1.75 trillion budget deficit is you can assume it is a gross underestimate of the actual number.

How the original 2009 budget deficit figure was obtained is not immediately clear. The Congressional Budget office estimated a deficit of $219 billion, which did not include the $168 billion stimulus plan passed early in the year. Adding those two numbers together, you would get $387 billion. Spending for the Iraq war was also not included in the number. If you use the current absurdly low estimate of only $170 billion that would bring the figure to $557 billion, not $407 billion (much Iraq war spending seems to somehow be kept magically out the budget). I frequently run into arithmetic problems such as these when looking at government reports. Nothing adds up correctly and the final number looks much better than what you should be getting from the component parts.

There were a few voices that were questioning the deficit numbers back in early 2008. Bill Gross from Pimpco warned that the budget deficit could rise to 5% of GDP and be as high as 600, 700, or even 800 billion dollars. We at the New York Investing meetup predicted that the first trillion dollar deficit would take place during the Bush administration. While this was considered an outrageous claim at that time, it was actually too low. As with much of the Credit Crisis, things have turned out to be even worse than the most dire outlook.

No one really knows what the actual budget deficit or national debt (the accumulated debt over time) is. Many items don't appear in either and this is not limited to Iraq war spending. Toward the end of last year, it was estimated that $8.5 trillion has been spent on trying to deal with the Credit Crisis. Most of that money is not included in the budget deficit or national debt. Future obligations for social security and medicare/medicaid are also ignored. Accounting for those could raise the national debt to the $50/$60 trillion level, if not more.

Where is the money coming from to pay for all of this spending? The major source is through 'printing'. While you can not print more and more of your currency and not have it devalue (the correct definition of inflation), this doesn't stop top economists such as Paul Krugman and Noriel Roubini from constantly opining in the media about the dangers of deflation. Just in case the 'experts' are misguided on this one, you might want to pick up some gold and silver during their current pull back. Oil, another inflation hedge, is also a great buy at the moment.

NEXT: Citi Dives, GDP Plunges - Both Off the Cliff

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.