Stock Rally in Beginning of Month Ignored Economic Reality

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. stocks had an impressive rally the first four days of the month and this is generally a bullish indicator.  The rally took place with a backdrop of really ugly economic news however and that is not bullish. Weakness has a way of coming back to haunt the market as European bank news is demonstrating today.

U.S. economic reports for the last few months have been generally bad to awful. Nothing changed last week. While the ISM manufacturing index went up, this supposedly occurred because of a big increase in manufacturing jobs (the inflation component of the report was the actually the biggest gain, but the mainstream media somehow didn't report this negative news). This gain was not corroborated by the government's August employment report, which showed a drop in manufacturing jobs, nor by anecdotal evidence or anything else taking place on the planet earth. The stock market of course rallied strongly on the news.

The ISM non-manufacturing index, which measures the almost four times bigger service sector, didn't get nearly as much media coverage. It barely remained in positive territory. The inflation component, also the highest number in this report, was chiefly responsible for the number not going negative and indicating contraction.  Two components of the report were clearly in contraction however - exports and employment. The service sector losing jobs is a big negative for the overall U.S. economy.

Also lost in the stock buying frenzy was August car sales. They were down 21% year over year. This followed the 27% monthly drop in existing home sales in July and the 33% drop in new home sales in May. Last August was the peak of the Cash for Clunkers program. The numbers for car sales and home sales both demonstrate what happens when government incentives are no longer available in a market. While new homes sales fell to the lowest level ever recorded, August car sales were only at a 28-year low. For those who don't recall, 1982 was when the previous double-dip recession took place.

Government stimulus programs didn't fix the housing and car markets, but merely made them look better. This works for a while, but reality eventually rears its ugly head. A report from Europe today said that "the continent's major banks have more potentially risky government debt on their books than was disclosed during stress tests earlier this year." This wasn't exactly a piece of information that required the skills of Sherlock Holmes to uncover. At the time of their release, the stress tests were roundly criticized as being a phony PR gambit that set the bar so low that any bank not declaring insolvency in the next week would pass. Stocks of course went up on the news back then and today they are going back down.

Economic reality will eventually be reflected in the stock market. As I have said many times however, it's not the economy that drives the stock market in the short term, but liquidity. The Fed obviously kept pushing the 'flood the financial system with liquidity' button in early September. What happens when they stop doing this? See the homes sales and car sales numbers for a hint of how stimulus withdrawal impacts a market.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

BLS Press Release MisReports August Jobs Data

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to the August jobs report, the U.S. lost another 54,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate rose to 9.6%. The government claimed that the private sector added 67,000 jobs, although most of these jobs came from the Health Care and Social Assistance category and from Education, both of which are filled with jobs supported by the government. The numbers in the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) press release did not agree with the Data Tables and of course made things look better than they actually were.
      
The data in the non-farm payrolls report indicated that there were 40,200 jobs created in the Health Care and Social Assistance category (the mainstream media almost always leaves off the Social Assistance part, perhaps because these are so obviously government and not private sector jobs). Interestingly the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) press release only admitted to 28,000 jobs and this incorrect number was picked up in every mainstream media article. The BLS press release, which can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf, stated "Employment in health care increased by 28,000 in August, with the largest gains occurring in ambulatory health care services (+17,000) and hospitals (+9,000)".  The Establishment Data Seasonally Adjusted (Table B in the report), which can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.b.htm, stated that the number of jobs in Health Care and Social Assistance increased by 40,200.

The Goods Producing Sector, which actually does include mostly private sector jobs (nationalized companies like General Motors being the exception), was dead in the water in August. The total number of jobs added was ZERO. Goods producing industries include Manufacturing, Mining and Logging, and Construction. Manufacturing lost 27,000 jobs and this contradicts the rosy picture painted by the ISM manufacturing report from two days ago that indicated U.S. manufacturing employment was skyrocketing. Construction kept the Goods Producing Sector from being negative by adding 19,000 jobs. This occurred even though new home sales recently fell to the lowest number ever recorded. Perhaps these workers are busy building castles (or more appropriately, McMansions) in the sky, so of course their work isn't immediately visible to ordinary mortals such as ourselves.

There is no evidence in the August payroll numbers of any significant non-government related hiring taking place. The first job loss number was reported three years ago in August 2007 and after over $3 trillion in deficit spending since then, the U.S. employment situation has managed to only reach a state of controlled bleeding. There were an estimated 6.6 million students graduating from school this year and eventually most of them will need a job. That implies the U.S. needs 550,000 new jobs a month to absorb former students into the labor force. People are of course always leaving the labor force as well because of retirement and for other reasons such as giving up looking for a job because none are available. It has been generally accepted for a long time that the U.S. must add at least 200,000 jobs a month to just accommodate new people looking for work.  Even after getting to that level, and we are still losing jobs not gaining them, there is then an additional 8 million jobs that have to be created to replace those lost during the Credit Crisis. So far, it's just not happening.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Q2 GDP Report: 5 Important Things You Need to Know

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported today that GDP increased by 2.4% in the second quarter. First quarter GDP was revised up to 3.7%. The annual revisions for previous years indicated that the U.S economy contracted at an average annual rate of 0.2% between 2006 and 2009.

While 2.4% is in and of itself a fairly decent increase in GDP, the components that made up the increase are the key to interpreting how good it really is. To do this, it's necessary to know whether or not they are sustainable and even whether or not they are believable. Increases in some components are a negative because they ultimately lead to lower growth in the future. Inventories are the best example of this. Others, such as increased government spending are at best neutral because they don't indicate an improvement in the private economy. If spending isn't going to be increased further in the future, then this also indicates lower GDP going forward. Finally, some numbers simple don't match up with other government reports, observations of reality, or economic definitions. If they don't, they are obviously inaccurate.

So how do the GDP numbers stack up in the latest report?  Based on the official news release from the BEA, which can be found at: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm, it can be seen that:

1. Inventory increases added 1.05% to second quarter GDP. Based on the annual revision, they added 2.64% to first quarter GDP or 71% of the total increase. Inventories were also responsible for approximately two-thirds of the GDP increase in the fourth quarter of 2009. The entire economic 'recovery' has essentially been an inventory adjustment. This does not bode well for the future.

2. Government spending was up across the board in Q2. Federal spending increased by 9.2% in the second quarter versus 1.8% in the first quarter. State and local spending was up 1.3% this quarter versus a decline of 3.8% last quarter. The second quarter was when stimulus spending was at its maximum. So expect less of a contribution from government spending to future GDP and lower numbers as a result.

3. The most obvious fantasy figures in the report was the new home construction figure. This supposedly increased by a whopping 27.9%, even though the Commerce Department's New Residential Structures report (more commonly known as new home sales) indicated a 6% decline quarter to quarter and an 8% decline year over year. Nor is there any evidence of a massive increase in new home inventories or any real world evidence indicating a huge building boom. This number is impossible.

4. Somewhat suspicious is the increase in investment on business structures (commercial real estate). This was up for the first time since Q3 2008. The big increase in banks going under that is currently taking place is being caused by commercial loans going bad, yet commercial construction is now on an upswing? Perhaps work on the BP oil spill juiced up this number. Interestingly, the UK also reported a huge increase in construction spending last quarter as well, although there is little evidence of much construction going on there. BP is headquartered in the UK, but it spent its money to handle the oil spill in the U.S.

5. The most ridiculous claim of all was the revised figures for 2008 GDP. Based on original reports, GDP increased by almost 3% in 2008, a very good rate, even though it is universally acknowledge that the U.S. was experiencing the worst economic downturn since the 1930s Great Depression. GDP is supposed to decrease during a recession, not go up. In the revision in July 2009, GDP for 2008 was revised downward to plus 0.4%. In the current revision, GDP growth for 2008 is now listed as 0%. Perhaps after another 15 to 20 revisions it will get to a more reasonable number. The history of 2008 GDP indicates the U.S. can overstate its GDP by a total of 6% to 9% in its initial reporting. Keep that in mind when you read that GDP was up 2.4% last quarter.


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

New Home Sales: Still at Depression Levels

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The June New Homes Sales figures were released today and the Commerce Department claimed they were up almost 24%. Stocks rallied strongly on the supposedly good news. A revision of May's all-time low number to a much worse all-time low number is what gave the appearance of a strong rebound.

New home sales for May were originally reported at a 300,000 annual rate last month. This compares to a high of around 1.4 million in 2005. It was also the lowest number ever recorded in the history of the data. As bad as 300,000 was, and it was truly awful, there was a significant downward revision for May sales in the current report to only 267,000.

May sales were also not the only month with a downward revision. The figures for April were originally reported as 504,000 in the report released in May. Then in the report released in June, they were revised lower to 446,000. Then in today's July report they were revised downward again to 422,000. Do we see a trend here?

The home buyer tax credit was good until the end of April. With the revised numbers, new home sales actually fell 37% in May, not the merely disastrous 33% originally reported. The drop from the originally reported April number was 47% however. If you wish to claim there was a 24% rebound for the numbers in June, as the government did, you need to put it in the context of a 47% drop first taking place, otherwise you are comparing apples to oranges. No matter how you look at it though, new home sales were and still are at depression levels.

New home sales figures have been continually revised downward for several months now. It is highly likely that the 330,000 number just reported for June will be revised lower next month and quite possibly lower again the month after that. The Commerce Department reports the best number possible the month of the release. The mainstream media then gives that news big attention and uses it to reinforce an image that government programs are being effective. When the downward revisions take place in future months and indicate things aren't quite so rosy, that news gets buried in the article - if it is mentioned at all. This is not the only U.S. government data where this pattern exists, nor does this only take place in this country. Investors shouldn't let themselves be tricked by this game.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Stocks Weaken With the Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. stocks are in sell off mode this morning with all major indices trading below their 200-day moving averages. If current trends continue, the Dow and S&P 500 will give a bear market trading signal next week.

Problems in Europe continue to be a drag on the markets. The prices of Greek debt credit default swaps (CDSs), a type of bond insurance, are rising rapidly again. Experts say they are now indicating a 57% chance of default. Meanwhile, strikes are planned throughout France because the government is trying to raise the retirement age to 62. Investors should assume that EU attempts to reduce the socialist gravy train will be fought tooth and nail by the populace everywhere on the continent. Good news came out of Australia however. Prime minister Kevin Rudd was forced out because of his unpopular 40% super-tax on the mining industry (a key part of the Australian economy).  Australia doesn't have the debt problems that exist in the U.S. and Europe.

In the U.S., the economic numbers continue to be less than impressive. After the disastrous New Homes Sales report yesterday indicated a 33% drop in sales in just one month, the Durable Goods report showed a 1.1% decline in May. Weekly claims fell to 457,000, still well within recession levels, and this got some positive commentary from the cheerleading section of the press. The stock market didn't seem impressed however. While weekly claims have been much better this year than the depression levels they were at early in 2009, they have yet to indicate that the U.S. has recovered from the recession that began in December 2007.

The technical picture for stocks turned south again this Wednesday with the Dow and S&P 500 falling and closing below their 200-day moving averages. The tech heavy Nasdaq dropped below its 200-day yesterday, but managed to close just above it. It looks like it will close below it today. The small cap Russell 2000 is trading below its 200-day today for the first time since earlier this month. The 50-day moving averages for all the indices are still above their respective 200-days in a typical bull market pattern. The 50-days are all falling however and in the case of the Dow and S&P 500, it looks they will be crossing below their 200-days next week. This is a classic bear market signal.  Investors should be watching this carefully.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Fed Statement Not so Bullish This Month

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. Fed ended its two-day meeting today and left its zero interest rate policy in place. While this was unsurprising, the statement the Fed issued provides investors with some insight into its current thinking on the economy. It was much less bullish today than in April, but still contained a lot of spin and denial. 

In past articles on March 17th and April 29th, I have discussed how the Fed has waited two to three years after the end of a post war era recession before raising rates and that this would be happening again.  That would mean the earliest Fed rate rise would take place around July 2011. Nevertheless, at that time many economists at the biggest U.S. bond dealers were predicting that a rate rise was likely at the Fed meeting this June. Since then, an article by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has appeared that suggested that the Fed should possibly wait until 2012 before raising rates (a three year period after the end of the recession). After reading that, the highly paid economists at the too big to fail institutions changed their tune and now almost all of them are predicting that the Fed won't raise rates until next year or even 2012. Your taxes were used for government bailout money to pay the salaries of many of these 'can't think for themselves' economists.

Almost all of these same economists are also parroting the Federal Reserve mantra that there can't be inflation while resource slack exists in the economy. One chief economist for a major bank recently stated, "inflation will hardly be a threat in an economy where massive labor-market slack is suppressing wages". Was he discussing the U.S. where unemployment is around 10% or Zimbabwe where it reached 94%? Of course, everyone would say it must be the U.S. because Zimbabwe had the second worse hyperinflation in world history. Truly massive resource slack always accompanies hyperinflation, but don't expect to get facts like that from the typical mainstream economist. They're paid to provide views that help their institutions make money, not to give the public the facts.

In its April meeting, buffoonish Ben and his stalwart crew of fed governors broke out the cigars to congratulate themselves on the great state of the U.S. economy.  The Fed statement released after the meeting was filled with glowing statements about the economy such as: "economic activity has continued to strengthen and the labor market is beginning to improve", "growth in household spending has picked up recently", "business spending on equipment and software has risen significantly", and "financial market conditions remain supportive of economic growth". There was one fly in the ointment however, " bank lending continues to contract". The Fed didn't seem too concerned. After all that only impacts the real economy, small and medium size businesses, and the guy on Main Street. Lack of lending can also cause recessions however. The Fed has apparently woken up to this unpleasant annoyance recently and behind the scenes reports indicate that it has been studying what to do in case the U.S. economy takes a second nosedive.

The Fed statement from the June meeting wasn't quite as optimistic after a number of recent economic releases indicated a weakening U.S. economy. Before the meeting ended today, it was revealed that new homes sales plunged 33% to record low level in May. The May employment report was unimpressive and indicated most new jobs were temporary and coming from the Census. Despite the obvious economic deterioration taking place, the Fed said in today's statement, "Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April suggests that the economic recovery is proceeding and that the labor market is improving gradually".

The Fed continued to maintain that household spending was increasing, but admitted that it was constrained by high unemployment, lower housing wealth and tight credit (that certainly sounds like something that's going to be taking off in the near future). The Fed also stated that investment in commercial real estate continues to be weak and that "employers remain reluctant to hire". It acknowledged that "housing starts remain at a depressed level" (it would be hard to argue that something that was at the lowest point ever was anything but). The Fed further stated that financial conditions had become less supportive of economic growth and then blamed the Europeans. Moreover it reiterated once again that "bank lending has continued to contract in recent months". The Fed then ended its statement still upbeat about the future.  Maybe they just don't think recession is such a bad thing after all.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Home Sales Fall Expectedly

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. home sales figures for December were out this week. Existing Home Sales fell 16.7% and New Home Sales fell 7.6%. The mainstream media reported the numbers as a surprise. There was nothing surprising about them at all. The U.S. real estate market was being propped up with special government tax credits and when it looked like those credits would disappear at the end of November, homebuyers disappeared with them.

The federal government's tax credit for homebuyers, originally only for new buyers, was renewed until next spring and extended to include people who already own homes. People shopping for homes didn't know that this would happen though, so they rushed to buy before the original November 30th deadline. It looks like the credit accelerated already intended purchasers, rather than actually creating new ones. Existing Home Sales figures started rising in April 2009 (there was a dip in August) and then they fell apart in December after the intended tax expiration date. The drop in Existing Home Sales was the largest in over 40 years.

The U.S. government has instituted a number of programs other than tax credits to directly or indirectly prop up the housing market. HERA - the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 - resulted in a purchase of an estimated $220 billion in mortgage backed securities by the Treasury Department and is the vehicle for keeping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac afloat.  The feds provided $300 billion to the FHA for its 'Hope for Homeowners' program. The legislation was signed into law in July 2008 and was considered the solution to stabilizing the housing market; apparently hope was all that was delivered however. The Obama administration's 'Making Home Affordable' program from early 2009 was intended to offer assistance to seven to nine million homeowners with loan modification to prevent foreclosure. How successful have these programs been? New Home Sales fell 22.9% to 374,000 units in 2009 - a record low (sales were at a 1.4 million annual rate in October 2005). So far, foreclosures have hit a record 237,052 in the third quarter of 2009. Figures for the fourth quarter haven't been released yet.

Instead of spending huge amounts of taxpayer money to support the housing industry, it would be best to let prices adjust to realistic market levels.  It was government programs that created the housing bubble in the first place, which in turn led to the Credit Crisis. Home prices went to unsustainable levels based on historical trends. They need to come back down to those trend levels before the market can start a true recovery. Until that happens, the market will have to have continual government money pumped into it to keep sales and prices up. Even then, the housing situation can continue to deteriorate - and it shouldn't be unexpected when it does.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: The State of the Union for Investors

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

New Homes Reveal Old Problems With Government Statistics

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The U.S. New Home Sales report released on December 23rd indicated a drop of 11.3% in November. Analysts had expected a gain. According to the previous Commerce Department reports, new homes sales had risen every month since April. They were expected to rise again in November because a government tax credit for new home buyers was originally scheduled to end in the beginning of the month (it was extended to June 2010), so analysts had assumed that there would be a rush of last minute buyers. There may have been and without them the drop might have been much greater than 11%.

New Home Sales is almost certainly the most inaccurate of the economic reports issued by the U.S. government. I can say this with some certainty because it would be almost impossible to produce something more error ridden. One of the major news services stated in their coverage of the November report, "Government statisticians have low confidence in the monthly report, which is subject to large revisions and large sampling and other statistical errors. In most months the government isn't sure whether sales rose or fell." Read that last sentence again and then consider that if the U.S. government is willing to issue an official report on housing that is about as accurate as picking numbers randomly out of a hat, how much can you trust the GDP, CPI, PPI (the two major inflation reports) and Non-Farms Payroll reports. Also note that the mainstream financial media seems to be well aware of the lack of reliability, but doesn't mention it except on very rare occasions when the news is particularly bad.

If the New Homes Sales report is so prone to inaccuracy why not just fix the problem? This is indeed a good question. The statistical tools to make this report better have been known for decades and yet the U.S. Commerce department doesn't seem to be able to apply them. It can be assumed that this isn't done because they don't want to do it. Statistically sloppy work is extremely prone to manipulation after all, solidly done work is not.

When confronted with this problem, you will get a more accurate picture of what is taking place by looking at many months of data in aggregate and comparing it to the previous year (the errors will cancel out at least to some extent). In the first 11 months of 2009, new home sales are down 24% from the first 11 months in 2008. Inventories have been falling throughout 2009 and are now at 38 year lows. The number of homes under construction or planned for construction have fallen to a record low. If new home sales were rising between April to October as the Commerce Department reported, why are home builders building fewer and fewer homes? That doesn't look like an industry in recovery as the public has been repeatedly told. For some reason, we seem to have gotten a glimpse of the true state of the housing market in the November New Home Sales report. Perhaps the guy in charge of producing cheerful statistics was on vacation? Somehow, I'm sure he'll be back soon.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

NEXT: Investing Themes for the Next Decade

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.