Negative Outlook for Market from January Barometer

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

At the New York Investing meetup we look at the first four trading days of the year as a guide to whether money is shifting into or out of the U.S. stock market. This reading was essentially neutral this year. There are others however that look at the entire month of January to gage money flow for the market. This reading was unabashedly negative. The Dow Jones was down 8.8% and the S&P 500 was down 8.6% on the month. While the stock market was suffering in January, gold was gaining strength and closed at a bullish six-month high the last day of the month. While worries about inflation (which are only going to get worse) are propelling gold upwards, collapsing corporate earnings and an economy that continues to deteriorate are pushing stocks down.

Trading activity in January only reinforced already existing trends for stocks and gold that can clearly be seen in their charts. All major U.S. stock indices, including the Dow, the S&P 500, Nasdaq and Russell 2000, pierced their 200-month simple moving averages four months ago. All of them closed below this line in January. There have only been two significant breaks of the 200-month moving average in the last 100 years - briefly during the mid-70s and for a much longer time during the Great Depression 1930s. In sharp contrast to the mega-bear stock index charts, the gold chart is extremely bullish. It indicates that gold's drop from the 1033 high last March is merely a consolidation (sideways movement) in a longer term uptrend.

The poor performance of stocks in January was consistent with the outlook for the economy and corporate earnings, which only got worse as the month progressed. Only a week ago, analysts were predicting a 28% drop in S&P earnings for the Q4 2008. Now a 35% drop is projected. Seven of the 10 sectors in the S&P 500 are expected to have earnings drops. Financials are the only sector that is likely to out and out lose money though. The next worse hit sectors, consumer discretionary and the materials, are heading toward 70% and 69% drops in earnings respectively. Health care, consumer staples and utilities are the only sectors with any possible earnings growth. U.S. consumer spending figures for December were released this morning and were down a worse than expected 1.0% (a record sixth straight drop). Until the economy revives (and this is not in the foreseeable future), earnings growth outside of companies that provide necessities or precious metals is unlikely.

While the beginning of the year provides the most valuable information for future stock performance, trading at the beginning of the month is also something that should be watched. In a bull market, these days are almost always up, although an occasional glitch does happen. In a bear market, down days are much more likely during this period because money is flowing out of the market instead of into as is does during bull phases. Keep an eye on this during the rest of the year, especially at the beginning of a quarter.

NEXT: Government Action on Both Sides of the Pacific

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

GDP - Report is Bad, Reality Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. government released the fourth quarter GDP figures today. The report showed a 3.8% annualized decline in the economy, which would be the worst showing in 26 years if it were true. It is not. This report continues the unbroken chain of fantasy that has emanated from the U.S. commerce department recently (the Inflation and Employment reports are the U.S. government's other great works of fiction). Even the internal figures in the GDP report show that the economy is in much worse shape than the top line number indicates. The lie was so outrageous this time that even the ever credulous mass media included statements in its reporting about the likelihood of the number being revised downward when 'new' data becomes available (or when the embarrassment of so many people laughing at the report becomes so great that the government is forced to publish a somewhat more realistic number - don't expect the truth under any circumstances however).

The first place to look for manipulation in every GDP report is in the inflation figure used to adjust the nominal figure to get the reported or 'real' number (growth caused by inflation is not actual growth and that is why this adjustment has to be made, this adjustment is the GDP deflator). According to the U.S. government, prices FELL by 5.5% in the U.S. in the fourth quarter of 2008. The government also claimed that the prices rose only 1.2% in the second quarter of 2008 (a time when gas prices were heading above $4.00 a gallon, food prices were soaring, and the government's own PPI report indicated inflation of around 13%, yet somehow the GDP statiticians couldn't find any inflation that quarter). If a more realistic inflation figure had been used, GDP for the fourth quarter may have declined 8% or 9% - a depression level drop.

The bigger decline in GDP is supported by looking at the individual components of business and consumer spending. Spending by businesses on equipment and software fell at a whopping 27.8% annualized pace, the most since 1958. Hard hit homebuilders slashed spending by 23.6%, even deeper than the 16% annualized cut in the prior three months. While internal U.S. economic conditions were bad, there was no relief from exports either. U.S. exports, whose alledged growth earlier in 2008 helped produce better GDP figures, turned negative. Exports plunged at a rate of 19.7%, the most since the deep recession of 1974. Despite these horrendous conditions, the GDP report also claimed businesses increased inventories substantially (which adds to current GDP growth, but would subtract from it in the future). just taking out this supposed inventory increase, U.S. GDP would have contracted by 5.1% instead of 3.8% last quarter.

The consumer component of the GDP equation didn't look any better either. U.S. consumers cut back spending on durable goods (items expected to last a year or more such as cars, appliances, furniture, etc) by a huge 22.4%, the largest amount since 1987. Spending on non-durables (which includes most necessities such as food and clothing) fell by 7.1%. A decline of that magnitude has not been seen since 1950. Despite these very large declines, the GDP report stated that consumer spending fell by only 3.5% in total (on the surface it doesn't seem possible that you could get this number from the component parts).

Despite the Credit Crisis which had ravaged the economy in 2008, the U.S. government claims that the American economy grew (yes, grew) by 1.3% in 2008. This is down from 2.0% growth in 2007. Anyone who believes this number, probably also thinks that pigs can fly. Obviously, the Commerce Department in Washington is trying to statistically prove that this can happen, although it doesn't seem to be possible anywhere else in the country.

NEXT: Negative Outlook for the Market from January Barometer

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Government Wants to Play Good Bank, Bad Bank

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The buzz on the wires yesterday was talk that the Obama administration is considering a good bank, bad bank policy. This would entail the government becoming the bad bank (like somehow that hasn't already happened) by buying up most, if not all, the toxic assets in the banking system. For anyone who missed it, this was the original intent of the biggest waste of government money of all time TARP program (Troubled Asset Relief Program). The Federal Reserve has also been doing this is various ways as well. Yesterday's reports said that the federal government would take on an (additional) trillion dollars in bad debt. As usual, the downside risk of major inflation that would result from implementing this policy was ignored by the media.

There was plenty of other 'good' news for the market to rally on as well. The House passed an $819 billion stimulus bill (it still has to be approved by the Senate). The bill would cut taxes at bottom instead of the top of the income structure (the most effective way to stimulate the economy), provide billions of dollars for infrastructure projects, help states balance their budgets, and provide relief to people who've lost their jobs or homes. Getting in touch with their Herbert Hoover roots, every Republican in the House voted against it. Just as a reminder, all the Republican leadership supported TARP and provided the votes from the rank and file to insure its passage.

The Fed also held up its end of the bargain yesterday as it two day meeting ended. To no ones surprise, it announced that it was keeping its zero interest rate policy in place. The Fed also reiterated that it will continue to buy mortgage-backed securities and other assets. The stock market rallied on this and all the other highly inflationary news and and as been the case for many months, the U.S. dollar counter intuitively rallied (only counter intuitive if you don't assume the government is manipulating it behind the scenes). Beaten down financial stocks led the way up.

Wells Fargo was one of the biggest winners, rising 30%. It only lost $2.55 billion last quarter.... or so it claims. Those results didn't include its Wachovia purchase, which would have increased Wells Fargo's loss by $11.2 billion (based on the reported figures, the reality is actually much worse). The bank took a whopping $37.2 billion in credit write downs at Wachovia. Even without the Wachovia losses, Wells Fargo still lost 79 cents a share. Analysts were completely off the mark as they have continually been since the Credit Crisis began and were expecting a 33 cent gain. While this should have tanked the stock, it didn't. Wells announced it was keeping its dividend and wouldn't need any more TARP funds (which is has been using to pay its dividend), so the stock shot up. Whoever said Disney was the king of fantasy, never looked at the U.S. banking system.

NEXT: GDP - Report is Bad, Reality Worse

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Latest From Davos Switzerland

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The invitation only annual World Economic Forum - a meeting of world leaders, central bank heads, economists from big financial firms, and billionaire investors - is currently taking place at Davos, Switzerland. In an opening forum, the people who pull the strings of the global economy and stock markets came to the following conclusions (long after they have been obvious to everyone else):

1. The world is facing unprecedented economic challenges.
2. Fiscal packages may not be enough to restore economic growth.
3. The multilateral financial system needs strengthening.

Fortunately, George Soros gave an early talk that had somewhat more substance than the above long-on-platitudes and short-on-specifics comments. At the same time, Nouriel Roubini who is in Switzerland, but possibly not at the conference, released a purposely well-timed statement about just how costly it would be to fix the banking system.

Soros stated that the current crisis has the potential to be worse than the one during the Great Depression in the 1930s. According to his calculations, the global banking system in developed countries still needs an additional $1.5 trillion to be rescued. Furthermore, the only way to pay for this is with money creation, or in other words - inflation. Nouriel Roubini now says that he estimates the total global bank losses from the Credit Crisis will be $3.6 trillion, far higher than his original estimates (and mine as well, last July at a talk at St. Johns University, I estimated $2 trillion, which was double the consensus at the time). Roubini further stated the biggest U.S. banks are insolvent (New York Investing first said Citibank was insolvent at the end of 2007).

Expect some talk about the two approaches to fixing failed banking systems. These are the Japanese model and the Swedish model. The Japanese reacted to their failed banking system in the 1990s by propping up as many failed institutions for as long as possible and the consequence was economic and stock market stagnation that has now lasted almost two decades. The Swedes had a banking collapse in the mid-90s and took that opposite approach. They took swift and drastic action, which was painful in the short term, but proved highly successful and their economy revived quickly. So far, the United States has come closest to the failed Japanese model in dealing with the banking crisis. The political will to step on some very rich and powerful vested interests has been lacking as has the willingness to admit that top U.S. banks such as Citibank and Bank of America are insolvent.

One person that is not yet at Davos is Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke. He is busy keeping fed funds rates at zero at the Fed meeting in Washington. The meeting ends today and presumably he will be jetting off to Switzerland shortly thereafter. Expect the quality of debate at Davos to suffer accordingly.

NEXT: Government Wants to Play Good Bank, Bad Bank

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Canary in the Coal Mine, the Foxes Guarding the Chicken Coup

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The government in Iceland collapsed yesterday. Severe economic decline combined with rising prices (a combination that the U.S. press constantly says can't exist together, but which reality indicates can) did the present administration in. The government received sweeping powers, which included potentially unlimited control of every business in the country, in an attempt to fix it. This approach never worked in communist countries and certainly wasn't going to work in Iceland either. Government policies in Iceland, just as in other developed economies, made the financial crisis possible. Since it was the government that allowed the economy to get beyond repair, it is not surprising the same government couldn't fix it.

The key to solving the Credit Crisis is to stop rewarding people for failure and instead punish them for it. Leaving the foxes in charge of the chicken coop is a guarantee that nothing will be fixed. A new study came out this morning showing that at least 90% of the top executives at banks and brokers that are receiving U.S. government bail out money are still at work. The very same people who made the bad decisions that have destroyed the financial system are being rewarded for doing so. In many cases, they are still receiving bonuses, paid by the U.S. taxpayer, for their 'excellent' performance. Why should anything get better under such circumstances? The newly appointed Treasury Secretary, tax cheat Timothy Geithner, is a strong advocate of government bailouts, so don't expect much change on that front. Based on his own personal behavior, he also obviously thinks there should be one set of rules for the people in charge and another for everyone else. How effective is he going to be in showing the corrupt and incompetent Wall Street elites the door?

Under such circumstances, it is not surprising that consumer confidence hit a new all time low of 37.7 in January. The present situations index, which measures how consumers feel about the current economy, declined further to only 29.9. The gloomy mood of consumers is translating to lower retail sales in the last many months and will create increased unemployment and bankruptcies in the retail sector in the not too distant future. Consumers are not only being hit by the threat of unemployment, but the two major pillars of wealth in the economy, the stock market and home prices, have pulled the rug out from under them. Just today, the Case Shiller home price index for November declined 18.2% year over year. A separate report a few days ago indicated house prices in California had dropped 38%.

While tiny Iceland can be bailed out by the World Bank, who is going to bail out Great Britain or the U.S.? The collapse phase of the Credit Crisis showed up first in Iceland because its small economy doesn't have the same degree of buffers and interdependencies that protect larger economies (at least in the short term). Iceland looks like the canary in the coal mine that expires first when exposed to toxic gas and warns the bigger miners to get out before the same thing happens to them. In our current economic situation, the bigger miners are just not taking the appropriate action to save themselves.

NEXT: The Latest from Davos Switzerland

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Unemployment Everywhere

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Just the morning alone the following job cuts were announced:
1. Caterpillar profit falls 32% in Q4, to cut 20,000 jobs.
2. Sprint to eliminate 8,000 jobs.
3. Phillips to cut 6,000 jobs after first loss in 5 years.
4. Home Depot to close Expo and Design business and cut 5,000 jobs.

These companies represent a range of industries showing the current recession/depression is having its impact almost everywhere. The one exception in the news today was McDonald's. Although the headlines said its earning were down, this was only a quirk resulting from tax payments. McDonald's is actually planning on opening 1000 news outlets in the next year, although not necessarily in the U.S. (most reporting failed to mentioned this), since its big growth areas are overseas. Nevertheless, for the moment the very low-paid jobs at McDonald's seem secure. This can not be said about much of the rest of the retail industry (the biggest private sector employer) however. Expect massive job cuts and store closings starting this spring.

The people responsible for the Credit Crisis are still mostly employed (and getting big bonuses as well). One of the recent exceptions in John Thain, the recently fired CEO of the financial cesspool Merrill Lynch. In a leaked memo, Thain claims that Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis knew about $4 billion in accelerated bonus payments to Merrill executives (apparently paid for with taxpayer money from TARP) and Merrill's Q4 losses (something a mentally challenged 5 year old with vision and hearing problems could have figured out, but not the CEO of one the biggest banks in the world). As discussed in this blog several days ago, Ken Lewis extorted the U.S. government to pony up more TARP funds because of these 'unanticipated' issues cropping up and threatened to KO the Merrill takeover if it didn't. John Thain will probably be remembered for his $35,000 toilet - an especially appropriate symbol for where most of U.S taxpayer Wall Street bailout money has gone.

There was 'good' news reported (never confuse reported from the mass media and reality) overseas this morning. Barclay's stock was up as much as 75% because of a big buffer in equity capital and reserves (something that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bear Stearn's and Lehman also claimed .... just before they went under). I can't say this is not true in Barclay's case because the UK government may have pumped enough money into the bank to make this possible. What I can say, is that traders never learn and can be duped over and over and over again with misinformation from the mass media which it will report over and over and over again and never question no matter how absurd it is.

NEXT: The Canary in the Coal Mine, Foxes Guarding the Chicken Coop

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Britain Points the Way to U.S. Economic Future

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

As of today, Great Britain is officially in recession, joining the U.S., Japan and Germany. Britain's GDP shrank 1.5% in Q4 2008, after shrinking 0.6% in Q3 2008. Those are at least the official figures, it is quite probable that the actual ones are even worse. Notable declines took place in the banking, retail, and manufacturing sectors (just like in the U.S.). The FTSE fell below 4000 and the pound dropped to 1.35 per U.S. dollar, a 23 year low, on the news.

Great Britain was once the premier economy in the world. The British pound was once the world's reserve currency. A rigid class system which guaranteed entitlement to those on top - similar to contemporary Wall Street in the United States - followed by socialist practices that offered entitlement to those on the bottom have over time eroded the country's economic dynamism. Early in the 20th century the capitalist free for all and innovation friendly U.S. began to assume economic preeminence after World War I. U.S. currency dominance was made official at Breton Woods in 1944 toward the end of World War II.

One of the most shocking stories in the history of technology illustrates quite clearly how Britain and U.S. attitudes differed in mid-century and why the U.S. became the post World War II economic powerhouse that it did. Both Britain and the U.S. developed early electronic computers for war time use. At the end of the war, the British government destroyed even the plans for the computers fearing they would fall into the hands of the Russians. The U.S. made the plans publicly available by publishing them, engendering one of the biggest growth industries of all time. The lesson of openness and transparency is currently being lost in the U.S. however with the Federal Reserve and Treasury engaging in significant and frequently secret manipulation of the financial system. In the long term this is only going to prove to be disastrous - although the short term results have been horrendous enough as is.

The response of the British prime minister, Gordon Brown, to the current British recession is that it is a result of global events. In case anyone has forgotten, Gordon Brown was the Chancellor of the Exchequer (equivalent to U.S. Treasury Secretary), who took the decision to sell half of British gold reserves in 1999 , when gold was around $260 an ounce, to buy among other things, U.S. dollars. Brown also has presided over a subprime crisis, 125% housing loans to people who could never pay them back were common, that is much worse than in the U.S. Unfortunately, while Gordon Brown is one of the most economically incompetent officials ever to run a major economy, he has plenty of company on the world stage these days. George Bush is certainly in the running for a close second. Many Japanese leaders in the last 25 years would be up there as well. Because economic idiocracies are common place in the world today, drastic action will be required to fix things. If the U.S. doesn't take appropriate action soon, it will be following Britain down the path of long term economic and currency decline.

NEXT: Unemployment Everywhere

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.