So Much for No Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The monthly PPI and CPI came out yesterday. Even the government's highly manipulated figures indicate that inflation has suddenly resurfaced (you can assume that inflation is actually a lot worse, see http://www.shadowstats.com/ for a more accurate set of numbers). But don't worry, the mainstream media assures us that "inflation is not expected to be a problem any time soon given a severe recession which is keeping a lid on wage pressures". Of course, they also said the same thing last month before inflation zoomed this month. They will probably also still be saying the same thing when you are paying $50 for a loaf of bread.

The PPI yesterday was the real shocker, rising 1.8% month over month (expectations were for it be up by 0.9%). While the media blamed this on a rise in energy prices, the core rate, which excludes food and energy prices, was up a substantial 0.5%. Media reports assured us that this was nothing to worry about though because PPI was down 4.6% year over year. The core PPI however was UP 3.3% year over year. This huge discrepancy indicates that the PPI went down because of falling energy prices. According to the media, a drop in inflation caused by falling energy prices is important, but a rise in inflation because of energy prices increasing is irrelevant. Those of you who are capable of basic logical thought may not think this makes any sense.

The CPI report had consumer prices up 0.7% last month. The core rate was up 0.2%. As with the PPI, the media said it's nothing to worry about because its all because of energy prices going up. However, the price of food, clothing and medical care all went up as well. While the price of almost every necessity went up, some luxury items like airline travel went down in price and this helped moderate the reported inflation rate. CPI was down 1.4% year over year, while the core was up 1.7%. Once again falling energy prices accounted for the drop.

What is causing inflation is that the U.S. government is printing a huge amount of additional currency. Since commodities are priced in dollars, in the long term it is going to take a lot more dollars to buy a given amount of oil, food or any other commodity. Prices have to go up. And it doesn't matter if there is a recession, or excess capacity in the system. This was the case in the U.S. in 1974 and prices zoomed. It has also been the case in every incident of hyperinflation throughout history.

NEXT: CIT DOA; Liquidity Injections Rally Market?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Deflation Boogieman, Oil and Intel

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The PPI report yesterday and CPI report this morning both indicated deflation - at least in the headline numbers. PPI was down 1.2% and CPI down 0.1%. The core rates were flat and up 0.2% respectively. Falling energy prices, and falling food prices as well this month, are responsible for the "deflation" that is being reported by the government. NYMEX oil prices meanwhile closed yesterday in New York at $49.41, but were once again above $50 again in European trading this morning (the weekly storage report is out today at 10:30AM New York time). Oil is well off the $33 low being reflected in recent inflation statistics. Tech bellweather Intel released earnings last night and there was actually some good news in the numbers. The CEO also blatantly stated the PC market had bottomed. Apparently traders don't believe him though since the stock had a big drop in the aftermarket.

We have covered many times in this blog how the U.S. government manipulates the inflation statistics to lower the reported inflation rate, so you should always add a few percent to whatever numbers it releases. We have also demonstrated several times how falling oil prices are almost solely responsible for the recent drop in U.S. inflation rates (falling oil along with drops in other commodity prices were the key components of the deflation that took place in Japan in the late 1990s and early 2000s as well, but you will never see this mentioned in media reports). The U.S. government reported this morning that year over year headline CPI is down 0.4% - the first annual decline since 1955 - but the core rate is up 1.8%. Yesterday, the headline PPI was reported down 3.5% since last year, the largest decline since 1950. Gasoline and food prices were down over 13% and even food prices supposedly dropped (something I haven't noticed in the real world).

Considering the light sweet crude oil is already around 50% above its February low, the days of the current "deflation" may be numbered (and of course the U.S. is printing new money at an outstanding rate to make sure they are). During the entire time that oil prices have rallied, the mainstream media has continually stated that the price can't go up until the economy recovers and demand for oil increases (neither has occurred, yet prices have risen) . A quote from an article this morning, "Demand will have to come back before you see the oil price move up from $50 in a sustained way." You can find very similar statements when oil was at $40 and yet the price rose to $50. My guess is you will see similar statements at $60 and probably $70 as well. Interestingly, the people being quoted in the articles today are different from the people that have been quoted, and who have been continually wrong, during the last few months. Is the mainstream financial press actually starting to realize that their credibility is damaged when they continue to quote a source that has been wrong a few dozen times in a row? Perhaps, although you should note that the quotes themselves that contain the inaccurate information are not changing, just the people they are attributed to.

Finally, Intel earnings last night were significant. While they don't exactly indicate that the global economy is running on all cylinders, they do indicate that tech spending is not collapsing. It is also unusual for a CEO of a major company to state so blatantly an opinion of overall market conditions. So why isn't the market giving his bullish comments any credibility? My feeling is that it is because tech spending in the U.S. may not have bottomed. However, the U.S. is not the center of world when it comes to technology spending (and many American traders have yet to realize this). The market for computers in East Asia became twice as big as the market in North America long ago. If demand for tech is picking up in Asia, the market could have indeed be turning around.

NEXT: Economic Statistics are Yesterday, Stock Prices are Tomorrow

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.