'Recovery' Leads to Double Digit Unemployment

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Just as the mainstream media has lulled the public into thinking we were on a one-way trip to economic happy land, today's U.S Employment Report throws cold water on the whole enterprise. The headline unemployment number came in at 10.2%. October was the first month in 26 years that U.S. unemployment has exceeded 10%. The alternative government unemployment figure, which includes discouraged workers and people who are forced to work part-time, rose to 17.5%. People, such as John Williams from ShadowStats, who adjust the government figures for more realistic numbers, generally add about 3% to that number to get the actual unemployment rate.

There was very little good news in the report. October was the 22nd month in a row that U.S. employment fell. There were large job losses in manufacturing, construction and retail. Retail losing jobs at the beginning of the big holiday selling season tells you just how bad things are. The average workweek is at a record low. The percentage of workers unemployed for over 6 months is at a record high. The labor force participation rate fell and the unemployment rate would have been even higher than 10.2% if this hadn't happened. The good news was that the numbers in August and September were slightly better than originally reported and that temp agencies added 34,000 jobs.

As usual mainstream economists underestimated how bad the report would be. Expectations were for a drop of 150,000 jobs and an unemployment rate of 10.0%. The 190,000 job loss reported is from the payroll survey by the way - and that is the one that is always reported by the media (and the one that shows that the employment situation is better of course). There is a separate household survey (which is a random sample, unlike the payroll survey) and that indicated a loss of 589,000 jobs in October. The government did state that total U.S. unemployment rose by that amount to 15.7 million.

The market reaction to the report was that stock futures, oil and gold dropped (gold had been as high as $1098 in early morning trading). In the long-term, this only means more money pumping, money printing, and dollar pimping by the Federal Reserve. This can only be bullish for gold and the rest of the inflation trade. There is no way that it is politically tenable for the Fed to raise interest rates until the employment picture improves. It is going to be in an increasingly uncomfortable position next year when inflation starts rising, yet unemployment remains high.

NEXT: Market Keeps Going as Stimulus Keeps Flowing

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

So Much for No Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The monthly PPI and CPI came out yesterday. Even the government's highly manipulated figures indicate that inflation has suddenly resurfaced (you can assume that inflation is actually a lot worse, see http://www.shadowstats.com/ for a more accurate set of numbers). But don't worry, the mainstream media assures us that "inflation is not expected to be a problem any time soon given a severe recession which is keeping a lid on wage pressures". Of course, they also said the same thing last month before inflation zoomed this month. They will probably also still be saying the same thing when you are paying $50 for a loaf of bread.

The PPI yesterday was the real shocker, rising 1.8% month over month (expectations were for it be up by 0.9%). While the media blamed this on a rise in energy prices, the core rate, which excludes food and energy prices, was up a substantial 0.5%. Media reports assured us that this was nothing to worry about though because PPI was down 4.6% year over year. The core PPI however was UP 3.3% year over year. This huge discrepancy indicates that the PPI went down because of falling energy prices. According to the media, a drop in inflation caused by falling energy prices is important, but a rise in inflation because of energy prices increasing is irrelevant. Those of you who are capable of basic logical thought may not think this makes any sense.

The CPI report had consumer prices up 0.7% last month. The core rate was up 0.2%. As with the PPI, the media said it's nothing to worry about because its all because of energy prices going up. However, the price of food, clothing and medical care all went up as well. While the price of almost every necessity went up, some luxury items like airline travel went down in price and this helped moderate the reported inflation rate. CPI was down 1.4% year over year, while the core was up 1.7%. Once again falling energy prices accounted for the drop.

What is causing inflation is that the U.S. government is printing a huge amount of additional currency. Since commodities are priced in dollars, in the long term it is going to take a lot more dollars to buy a given amount of oil, food or any other commodity. Prices have to go up. And it doesn't matter if there is a recession, or excess capacity in the system. This was the case in the U.S. in 1974 and prices zoomed. It has also been the case in every incident of hyperinflation throughout history.

NEXT: CIT DOA; Liquidity Injections Rally Market?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Inflation Versus Deflation Argument - Part 1

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

One of the Federal Reserves two major purposes is to provide price stability for the American economy, a goal they chose to abandon in September 2007. While the Fed's interest rate policies after that time were highly inflationary, Fed officials excused their actions by denying that inflation was a problem, making rosy predictions that it would subside, and by assuring the public that they were capable of handling it and taking care of it in case it became a problem. None of this was true of course and the Fed's position increasingly lost credibility as gasoline and food prices skyrocketed in the U.S.

The Fed's biggest cover for its actions was the official inflation figures produced by the U.S. government statistical agency, the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). The method of calculating the CPI (Consumer Price Index) was modified several times during the 1980s and the 1990s, with each modification producing a lower reported inflation number. Essentially these modifications involved reducing the importance in the CPI calculations of anything that was experiencing significant prices rises, thereby automatically lowering the final reported inflation numbers. It was hard for significant inflation to show up in the official government figures given this approach. By May of 2008, year over year CPI was only 4.2% in the U.S. despite rapidly rising energy and food prices during that period.

Recalculating CPI using the 1970s methodology indicated U.S. inflation was more likely around 12% (for more info: http://www.shadowstats.com/), almost as bad as it had been at its height in 1980. It became increasingly hard to convince the public otherwise, when the average U.S.consumer saw regular price increases at the gas pump and in the supermarket. Nevertheless, U.S. media continued to dutifully report the unrealistic official inflation figures as if they were true, helping the Federal Reserve perpetuate the fantasy on which it based its irresponsible monetary policy.

While the Federal government altered inflation calculations to produce the desired numbers in order to fool the general public about current inflation, lying about future inflation could not be done so easily. The augurs of where inflation was going, the money supply, are generally only looked at by the financially sophisticated. To solve this problem, the Federal Reserve simply stopped publishing the broad M3 money supply figures, the most telling number series of all, in 2006. Since many people realize that when a government hides information, its almost always information that would be particularly damaging if known, attempts to reconstruct M3 by private parties began immediately. By the spring of 2008, the reconstructed figures indicated that M3 was growing at approximately 20% (MZM, zero money, or cash and its equivalents was growing at an over 30% rate). The money supply figures indicated that U.S. consumer inflation was likely to peak at a minimum of 20% to 30% sometime around 2011. Depending on future readings, much higher inflation levels were possible.

The U.S. government's long-term misinformation campaign about inflation rates and its secrecy concerning money supply figures apparently didn't provide enough cover for the Federal Reserve. One group of apologists for the Fed (and the Fed had a legion of apologists who were feeding off the easy money gravy train that it was providing them at the expense of the American public) began publishing arguments about the risks of deflation in the U.S and how this justified an even easier money policy. Claiming that deflation actually existed in a period when inflation was getting out of control was by no means a new idea. It was in fact a prelude to some of the worse inflationary episodes in history.

NEXT: The Inflation Versus Deflation Argument - Part 2

For notes related to this talk, please see, 'Inflation vs Deflation Argument' at:
http://investing.meetup.com/21/Files

Daryl Montgomery,
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please see our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21