Q2 GDP Up Only 0.7% Without Government Spending

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.



The Bureau of Economic Analysis revised second quarter GPD growth down from 2.4% to 1.6% today. Stimulus spending peaked in the second quarter and despite the big boost that it provided, the U.S. economy only expanded at a rate that indicates the U.S. standard of living isn't declining further.

The U.S. needs GDP growth (adjusted for inflation) at about 1.5% for the well-being of the average person to remain the same. This is because of population increases and other factors including some overstatement of the numbers. Actual growth, meaning more jobs and increased incomes for the American people, only takes place when the GDP number is above that level. The U.S. right now needs a substantial amount of actual growth just to make up for the decline from the Credit Crisis/Great Recession and to get back over eight million lost jobs. Despite $2.7 trillion in federal deficit spending in the last two years, it's just not happening.

At the bottom of the Credit Crisis/Great Recession GDP declined at a 6.8% annual rate. So far during the 'recovery' GDP growth has been:

2009 Q3  1.6%
2009 Q4  5.0%
2010 Q1  3.7%
2010 Q2  1.6%

Most of this has come from changes in inventories -in the first three quarters, approximately two-thirds of 'growth' came from this one factor. Indeed this also would have been true of the Q2 number as well if the inventory component hadn't been lowered. Inventories for Q2 were originally reported as being responsible for GDP growth of 1.05% (divided by the new 1.6% total, this would indicate inventories were 66% of Q2 GDP growth). However the inventory contribution to GDP was revised downward even though according to the BEA, "Private businesses increased inventories $63.2 billion in the second quarter, following an increase of $44.1 billion in the first quarter". The smaller increase in inventories in Q1 was responsible for GDP increasing by 2.64%. This is a peculiarity of GDP math. In 2009 Q4 inventories decreased (yes, decreased) by $36.7 billion and this created 2.83% GDP growth. A decrease in inventories also created a 1.10% increase in GDP in Q3 2009.

Government spending was supposedly responsible for 0.86% of GDP growth last quarter. Subtracting that from 1.6% leaves only a 0.74% increase in Q2 GDP. Describing this as anemic would be an understatement. The federal government however accounts for almost a quarter of the U.S. economy and its spending increased by 9.1% in Q2. This would seem to indicate that the federal government contributed a lot more to Q2 GDP growth than what the BEA claims. It also begs the question as to how good the GDP numbers will be when government spending significantly declines as it is scheduled to do in fiscal 2011.

Q2 GDP would also have also been a lot lower without big increases in 'Gross Private Domestic Investment', which was up a whopping 25%. 'Equipment and Software' was up by 24.9% between April and June. In the recently released durable goods report for July, it had a big drop, as did machinery and other components in this category.  Two years of stimulus spending is responsible for revving up the investment component of GDP in the second quarter, but economic reports from early in the third quarter indicate that its impact is already waning. We will have to wait though until just before the November election to see the first numbers for Q3 GDP.

Disclosure: No positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Retail Sales Drop in May Shouldn't Be a Surprise

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. government released its Retails Sales report for May this morning. Analysts expected an increase, but sales dropped 1.2%. The markets were surprised that American consumers were spending less even though the unemployment rate is stuck around 10% and credit card debt has dropped for 19 months in a row.

The expectations for higher retail sales came from the massive amounts of federal government stimulus being pumped into the economy. There is a $1.6 trillion dollar budget deficit projected for fiscal year 2010 (the deficit for 2009 was $1.42 trillion) and this money is making all the economic numbers look much better than they would otherwise. The deficit alone is approximately 11% of the official U.S. GDP number (which is grossly overstated), but still represents less than half of all federal government spending.  Investors should ask themselves: Given all of this support, how weak is the U.S. consumer?

This is an important question because the U.S. has built an economy based on consumer spending, which reached 72% of GDP before the Credit Crisis. The consumer also became very over indebted in the 2000s and the saving's rate hovered around zero mid-decade.  To spend more, consumers need more income and credit (the amount available from savings is limited). A jobs recovery is needed to increase consumer income and even Washington admits that that is not happening in the foreseeable future. As for credit, the big banks are borrowing from the Federal Reserve at zero percent, but are not passing the savings on to the consumer. They are also decreasing credit card lines, not increasing them. Autos are one of the only areas where cheap credit has filtered down to the consumer level.

Auto sales have also directly benefited from government programs like Cash for Clunkers. There were no special government programs active in May and auto sales fell 1.7%. The drop in retail sales was essentially across the board though. Department stores were down 1.8% and general merchandise sales decreased 1.1%. Hardware stores were really hit hard with sales falling 9.3%. The only bright spot was a 3.3% drop in gasoline sales. This took place because gas prices dropped, not because less gas was purchased. The Retail Sales numbers are not adjusted for inflation.

For some time now, the message coming out of Washington has been one of economic recovery. This has been based on economic numbers pumped up by incredible levels of stimulus. The retail sales report today and the employment numbers in general show that stimulus is not working so well this time around. The basic idea for excess government spending is that it jumpstarts the economy just as an electric jolt jumpstarts a battery. If the battery is really dead however, no amount of electricity brings it back to life. The same is true for stimulus in a dead economy.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

March Employment Numbers Better Thanks to Government Hiring

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to the latest government statistics, U.S. nonfarm payrolls increased by 162,000 in March. The headline unemployment rate was still 9.7% as was the case in January and February. The alternative unemployment rate ticked up to 16.9% however. Most hiring took place thanks to the Census, the health care industry, and the magic of seasonal adjustments - none of which indicate a recovering economy.

The U.S. census has really been the key to the better (or more accurately less awful) employment numbers for the last several months. According to the recent payroll report, the U.S. government hired 48,000 census workers in March. Hiring has been going on for approximately a year now, but has only been substantial since last fall. The Financial Times of London has reported that the government will be hiring 1.2 million workers for the 2010 Census - twice as many as were needed for the 2000 Census (think of this as a form of hidden government economic stimulus). Only a small fraction of this number has shown up in the employment figures so far, unless the hiring is being hidden in the Business and Professional category. There appears to have been about 50,000 extra temporary workers showing up there every month since last fall. A footnote indicates that this number may include workers from 'other' categories - one possibility for 'other' would be government.

The seriousness of the unemployment picture and how bad the economy actually is can be seen in the number of long-term unemployed (those without jobs for more than six months). This number increased by 414,000 in March to 6.5 million. Of the unemployed, 44.1% are now long-term unemployed. This number is much worse than in any other recession in entire post-War period. Another 9.1 million people are working part-time because they can't get full-time employment. Another 2.3 million workers are considered marginally attached to the labor force and not counted as unemployed because they didn't look for work in the last four weeks, but did do so during the last year.

So what made the 162,000 job gains possible in March? In addition to 48,000 jobs officially listed from the census, there were another 40,000 temporary help service jobs. Health care was the next biggest gainer with 37,000 jobs. Health care has been the only industry to consistently add jobs since the recession began in December 2007. It is not an economically sensitive industry. Leisure and hospitality added another 22,000 jobs, manufacturing 17,000 and construction 15,000. Seasonal adjustments, the government statistician's tool for turning a sow's ear into a silk purse, should be considered the source of extra employment in these industries. When I saw the figures, I wondered if the extra construction workers had been hired to build castles in the sky. To be fair, a case could be made that manufacturing and construction are gaining jobs now simply because there couldn't be any more unemployment in the short-term in those industries, both of which have been devastated during the recession.

Despite all the negative aspects to the employment report, including average hourly earnings falling 0.1%, the mainstream media trumpeted it as more evidence that 'happy days are here again' (the title of a song from the Great Depression). Coverage was filled with statements such as, "The increase is the latest sign that the economic recovery is sustainable and healing in the job market is beginning." Government hiring of census workers and more health care jobs (many of which are also government related) does not indicate a sustainable economic recovery. Instead, it indicates sustainable government spending to try to make a recovery look like it is taking place.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

NEXT: Don't Confuse Inflation With Economic Growth

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Consumer Spending: Not Indicating Economic Recovery

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Commerce Department released figures for February consumer spending on March 29th. The report indicated that consumer spending was up 0.3% in February, but personal incomes were flat. The savings rate was lower though, dropping to 3.1% from 3.4% in January. Spending increases were highest for necessities, such as food and clothing. Spending on non-durables actually fell. Nevertheless, somehow the mainstream media looked at these figures and concluded, "Both the spending and income figures in Monday's report point to a modest economic recovery".

Now for a dose of reality.

If income is not going up, but consumer spending is going up, there are only three possible explanations. Consumers have either gotten increased credit and are borrowing more, they are spending savings, or they are selling assets.  If they are spending savings or selling assets to support their spending, the economy is in very bad shape, somewhat similar to the way it was during the Great Depression in the 1930s. Since the savings rate was still a positive number, consumers were not taking more money out of their savings accounts than they were putting into them. So consumers were still saving, but at a lower rate. The 'Personal Incomes and Outlays' report (that's its official name) doesn't analyze buying and selling of assets, but does have a figure on 'Personal Income Receipts on Assets' that includes interest and dividend income. This number decreased by $16.5 billion in both February and January and that may indicate that the public is quite possibly a net seller of assets. Consumer credit is also not handled in the report, but the latest figures from the Federal Reserve indicate that revolving (read credit card) consumer credit declined at a 2.5% annualized rate in January.

While the sources for the supposed increases in U.S. consumer spending are murky at best, the amount of consumer spending in and of itself is not a determinant of whether or not economic recovery is taking place. The increased spending needs to come from economic growth and not government spending. If it comes from more government spending, better numbers are just a shell game and are actually an indicator of just how troubled the economy really is.  U.S. consumer spending rose $34.7 billion in February. Of that amount, $16.6 billion came from an increase in federal government transfer payments. That is only the one-month change in federal spending being funneled directly into consumer's pocket. Government support for the U.S. economy has increased substantially and in myriad ways since the beginning of the recession in December 2007.

While consumer credit has declined significantly since the Credit Crisis began, government borrowing has increased to make up the slack. This is why the U.S. is facing a $1.6 trillion budget deficit in fiscal year 2010.  The record levels of government borrowing are propping up the entire U.S. economy, including consumer spending. Governments don't spend more when economies recover; they spend less. Only when U.S. government spending begins to decline sharply and reports come out that consumer spending is increasing should investors consider believing that economic recovery is really taking place.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Market Says U.S. Treasuries Riskier Than Corporate Debt

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,  New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

2009 Retail Sales Deconstructed

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. retail sales for December 2009 were down 0.3%. News outlets reported this as a surprising turn of events. While I am tempted to agree with that viewpoint, it is only because there is enough inflation in the system to make retail sales look better. The retail numbers are not adjusted for price increases and this should always be kept in mind when viewing them. Higher retail numbers don't necessarily mean a better economy.

The Commerce Department reported retail sales were up 5.4% year over year. It would have been almost impossible for them to be lower, since December 2008 was when the Credit Crisis was close to its worse point. Nevertheless, three major retail categories - Electronic and Appliance Stores, Building Materials and Garden Equipment and Supplies, and Furniture and Home Furnishings - had lower sales in December 2009 than they did a year earlier. These three retail sectors are dependent on the health of the real estate market. 

So what went up to improve the numbers?  Gasoline sales rose 34% year over year and by themselves accounted for almost 50% of the total increase in the raw numbers.  This is pure inflation. It is not likely that actual gasoline use is up, especially with the Cash for Clunkers program having subsidized more fuel-efficient vehicles for American motorists.  Sales for Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers were up 6% from 2008 and this accounted for another 19% of the increase in the yearly total. Government bailouts and stimulus programs are responsible for this increase. If you removed the inflation factor, and gasoline sales represent  only some of the inflation that might be in the numbers, and government programs that directly created higher sales, how much improvement would there have been?  Not much and there may have been none at all - so much for economic recovery.

There was one other important piece of information in the report for December that has significant ramifications. Sales at non-store retailers were up over 10% in 2009. Shifting of buying to the Internet is a strong negative for retailers doing business in physical stores, which are still struggling because of the economic downturn. This indicates that commercial lending, currently one of the major weak points in the U.S. banking system, will be even more troubled than it would have been from just the recession alone. Investors should assume more bailout money will be needed and this problem will go on longer than anticipated. However, as the retail sales report shows, government money can prop up an ailing sector of the economy, can make the economic numbers look better, and can create inflation, but it can't necessarily buy a recovery.

Disclosure: Not applicable.

NEXT: Toothless CFTC Tries to Bite Gold and Silver

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Smoking Gun of the Economic Recovery Scam

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Economic recovery that is supposedly taking place has been carefully arranged by the U.S. government. Unfortunately, the 'recovery' will be far more evident in the published statistics than in the economy itself. After all, it is a lot easier to change the numbers that to actually fix the economy. Apparently, the hope is that with enough cheer leading, businesses and the public will get on the bandwagon and start spending again. I can picture Bernanke, Geithner and Obama clicking their heels together and trying to wish hard enough to make it so.

The AIG earnings report came in as positive as expected on Friday. How did a company that is beyond bankrupt manage to show positive earnings? The key statement in the report about what happened was "resulting from the adoption of new accounting guidelines". These new guidelines were set by the U.S. government and probably benefited every big bank and brokerage house as well, most of which had surprisingly good earnings - even though their lending operations (the core business of any bank) were continuing to deteriorate during the quarter. So the mystery has been solved. If your earnings are disastrous, just change the accounting rules and like waving a magic wand, suddenly you're earning gobs of money. Happy days are here again!

If you want to know how well this approach works, you can take a look at Enron and GM. Enron's earnings were phony for years and then it imploded overnight. GM changed its accounting in the mid-2000s after the recession and suddenly one quarter it was earning big bucks instead of losing big bucks. To its credit, CNBC News actually reported that the big 'improvement' was merely an accounting gimmick. The stock still rallied strongly on the news (so much for the Efficient Market Hypothesis). Even though the government started pouring money into GM starting in 2007, it still went bankrupt in 2009. Now the government is supporting it to the tune of $4500 per car with the Cash for Clunkers program. Reports out today predict that autos are going to be the next big recovery area of the economy, improving both the industrial production numbers (which fell at a depression level 19% in the first quarter) and retail sales (which went up in May and June because of higher gas prices - they're not adjusted for inflation).

If the government pours huge amounts of money into any industry, the numbers will of course improve. This doesn't indicate economic recovery though, even though it is being sold that way. Will the government keep doing this every quarter? It may have to in order to keep the 'recovery' going. If you want to know how well that approach works, see Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe.

NEXT: Inconsistencies of the Economic 'Recovery'

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Shining, Silver Lustrous

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold traded as high as $970 in the futures markets yesterday. It is once again getting close to that magic $1000 level. Silver traded as high as $14.73, well above important resistance of $14.50. Meanwhile, the trade-weight U.S. dollar closed at 77.77. Tuesday was the second day below its breakdown level of 78.33. So far this morning it's trading lower.

A basic idea in technical analysis is that if a resistance point is tested enough, it will eventually be broken. Gold's all time high so far is $1032.70 set in European trading in March 2008. It broke 1000 again this February. It almost got back to 1000 again in early June. The end of the year starting in August is when gold is strongest seasonally. So, things look promising for the breakout from 1000 at some point fairly soon. A breakout after several tests is usually very bullish.

The fly in the ointment is of course the U.S. dollar. The key 78.33 level is the low during the late 1980s, early 1990s sell off. It was THE low for the trade-weighted dollar until it was broken in September 2007. The new low established after that sell off was under 72 when the dollar made a multi-month low between March and July 2008. While this is major support, there is some lesser support at 76.00. If gold is knocked down from the 1000 area again, that is where the dollar is likely to be trading when this happens.

In the long-term silver will do even better than gold. First though it has to break resistance as 16.00, which is bounced down from in the last rally and then it will head toward 21.00. Silver is both a monetary metal and an industrial metal. Economic recovery will increase demand (silver has been in a chronic shortage situation on and off for years as is). Inflationary worries will also increase demand. While silver ultimately outperforms gold, gold always moves first. Watch the yellow metal closely in the next few weeks.

NEXT: The Latest From Fantasy Land

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke Says Don't Worry - You Should Worry

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke is testifying before the U.S. congress today. Expect him to paint the rosiest picture possible and the mainstream media to glom onto the 'good times are coming' scenario. In preparation for his testimony, Bernanke published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today. In it he details all the policy tools the Fed has available to prevent future inflation. Indeed they COULD do all of the things mentioned. Whether they will be able to is quite another story and this is not discussed.

Although Bernanke did not state it specifically, there is one thing and one thing only that is absolutely required to stop inflation - the government has to stop printing excess money (more correctly referred to as currency). As long as this goes on, it doesn't matter what else is taking place. Governments almost without exception follow contradictory policies when inflation starts to get out of control. They will put on price and wage controls. They will try to limit capital outflow. They will try to prevent 'speculation'. They will try to lower the price of gold and silver with market manipulation. They will outlaw hoarding and black markets. They will do almost anything except printing less money and until they do, none of these other measures ever work.

More than once in his 'don't worry, the Fed has everything under control' article, Bernanke stated "economic conditions are not likely to warrant tighter monetary policy for an extended period". So the government doesn't even have the intention of printing less money. Even when it gets to the point that they know there is no other choice, they will either not do it or do it for a short time, realize it is damaging the economy, and then stop. This scenario has played out over and over again in the past. Central Banks always know that their excess money creation is causing inflation, but the economy becomes so addicted to their currency printing drug, it immediately goes into painful withdrawal when it's removed. Every central bank has the option of stopping the printing, just as Bernanke claims in his convoluted manner that the U.S. does now. But they don't do it.

As for claims that the economy is getting better, it is easy to engineer such statistics. Essentially economic activity consists of consumer spending, business spending and government spending. Increasing government spending by printing more money will improve the GDP numbers. If GDP gets better only because the government is spending more, it's highly inflationary. Better economic news is likely to be bad news. This issue wasn't discussed in the Bernanke article. Nor did he mention how he missed seeing the subprime crisis coming and how he subsequently mishandled ever aspect of it after its effects spread through the financial system. But NOW you can trust him. Yeahhhh, right.

NEXT: Dollar Watch; Bad Earnings are Good; Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.