Bernanke in a Hole in Jackson as Wall Street Evacuates

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Fed Chair Ben Bernanke gave his much awaited speech at Jackson Hole friday morning saying little of substance and less of note. Hours later, but only after the market had a chance to rally, New York City Mayor Bloomberg ordered a mandatory evacuation on the low-lying areas of New York City including Wall Street itself.

The mainstream press couldn't wait to trump up Bernanke's empty clichés and pump up the stock market. Before Bernanke started his speech the market started dropping and the Dow Industrials were down 220 points while he was speaking. Within two hours, the Dow had rallied almost 400 points from its bottom. Such huge market moves in a short period of time indicate an unhealthy market. When stocks bend too much, they eventually break.

What was the great revelation from the Fed Chairs speech? It was "the U.S. is headed for long-term economic growth". Another brilliant insight from the man that said subprime mortgages wouldn't cause any significant problem up to one month before they began torpedoing the stock market and the economy. Bernanke also failed to stop the worst bear market and recession since the Great Depression in the 1930s and let the world financial system fall off a cliff because he failed to understand what would happen if Lehman Brothers failed. But like the dim-witted son of a third world dictator, the press still slavishly talks him up after each ill-fated move.

Just as a barely subdued economic panic impacts America's main sreet communities, New York is on edge because of Hurricane Irene. Food stores and the transportation hubs are mobbed. People in low lying areas have been ordered to evacuate just before the authorities are closing down the subway system and commuter railroads -- the only way out for many New York residents. Another example of government action at its best. That Wall Street itself is in danger of being flooded just after more wisdom from Chairman Ben is an irony that should not go unappreciated.   


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Markets Trading Like They Did During Credit Crisis

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stocks are selling off globally. Commodities are down, but gold is holding up the best. Money is pouring into the perceived safe havens, the U.S. dollar and treasuries. Is it the late fall of 2008 or late spring of 2010?

Without further information, you can't answer that question. There is a global financial crisis occurring now because of the problems with the euro. There was a global financial crisis in 2008 because of the collapse of the prices of derivatives related to subprime mortgages. The problems with subprime debt had begun the year before and started impacting stocks in July 2007. Stocks were already in an advanced bear market sell off by the fall of 2008. The current euro crisis is only a few months old and U.S. stocks are only in a correction so far (loss of over 10% versus loss of over 20% for a bear market).

The current stock market sell off is worldwide as it was in 2008. It goes without saying the stocks in the eurozone are suffering, but technical damage can be found in major markets everywhere. The Dow Jones has broken key support at 10,000 twice already. The Nikkei gave up its significant 10,000 level a while ago, closing at 9521 last night. The Hang Seng has fallen below important support at 20,000, dropping to 19,378. In the UK, the FTSE is barely holding above 5,000 today.

The trade-weighted dollar (DXY) was as high as 88.71 in New York this morning (June 7th). This is higher than its peak in November 2008, but not as high as the top in March 2009. There was a major sell off in the middle, with the euro (FXE) having a sharp rally. Something similar is likely to happen early this summer. The dollar is very overbought and the euro is very oversold. The euro has traded as low as 1.1878 today. It may pop back up to the 120 support level and if not, there is stronger support around 115. The dollar is already hitting major resistance, so the set up for a short-term reversal looks like it is taking place.

As would be expected, U.S. treasuries have rallied strongly during the euro crisis. It is highly unlikely that they will get to the extremely low levels they did in 2008. As treasuries rally, interest rates go down of course. Interest rates on the 10-year fell to around 2.00% in December 2008. They were at 3.18% this morning. There is strong chart support at and just above the 3.00% level. So not much more of a treasury rally, interest rate sell off should be expected for now.

Currently gold has recaptured its safe haven status. It was selling off with the euro between last December and this February. Then it started rallying with the U.S. dollar, although it usually trades opposite to the dollar. Gold sold down in the fall of 2008. Central bank leasing was responsible for this. The big banks and large hedge funds leased gold at a small price and then sold it on the market to raise desperately needed cash. This is not happening at the moment to a significant enough degree that it can offset buying elsewhere. Ironically, a sharp relief rally in the euro could be short-term bearish for gold. Despite the selling in the fall of 2008, gold still closed the year up along with the U.S. dollar and U.S. treasuries. Almost every other asset closed down. It's still too early to tell if 2010 will end the same way.   

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Subprime Crisis #2 Coming Soon

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

It constantly amazes me that the people running the government and reporters who cover the government seem incapable of doing arithmetic at the first grade level. This is usually all that is necessary to foresee a disastrous outcome in the future. This is certainly the case with the impending FHA (Federal Housing Administration) crisis which will be blowing up soon. The FHA insures mortgages that have less than a 20% down payment. It is currently insuring four times as many mortgages daily as it did in 2006 at the height of the last subprime crisis and has 5.4 million loans on its books. A prominent congresswomen recently stated, "without the FHA there would be no mortgage market" right now.

In congressional testimony the head of this government agency recently stated that the FHA's finances were sound. Oh really? The FHA claims to have $30 billion in cash reserves. How long will that last considering that there are $675 billion in loans on the books and 24% of the loans from 2007 are troubled and 20% of the 2008 loans are troubled so far (these numbers can rise). Those percentages could be worse in 2009 and after. If more than 4.4% of the loans insured by the FHA go bad, it could be out of money, assuming (probably foolishly) that the $30 billion they claim in cash is unencumbered. If not, the percentage could be much, much less than 4.4%.

How is it possible that there be even more problem loans on the FHA books from this year and in the future? Anecdotal reports from some areas of the country say that as much as 100% of recent housing purchases are insured by the FHA. All you need to get this insurance is apparently a 3.5% down payment. A spotty employment record doesn't disqualify you, nor does having filed for bankruptcy in the past. Even more eye popping, having a previous mortgage that went into foreclosure does not keep you from getting a new loan insured by the FHA! The FHA business model is roughly equivalent to a company offering $100,000 life insurance policies for $100 to hospital patients who are on life support. Yet, the head of the agency claims that their finances are in good shape.

The FHA is only one of many new bailouts coming. A number of state and local governments are falling deeper into the red. Tax receipts are coming it at even lower levels than anything previously thought possible (another mystery of the 'recovering' economy). Small and midsized banks are falling like dominoes because of their commercial loans going sour. The FDIC insurance fund is already insolvent and the government will have to step in to prop it up. The Credit Crisis is by no means over, we have simply finished phase one and are about to enter phase two. But don't worry, the U.S. government has a printing press and can print all the money necessary to solve these upcoming problems.

NEXT: Dollar Breaks Support ... Again

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke Says Don't Worry - You Should Worry

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke is testifying before the U.S. congress today. Expect him to paint the rosiest picture possible and the mainstream media to glom onto the 'good times are coming' scenario. In preparation for his testimony, Bernanke published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today. In it he details all the policy tools the Fed has available to prevent future inflation. Indeed they COULD do all of the things mentioned. Whether they will be able to is quite another story and this is not discussed.

Although Bernanke did not state it specifically, there is one thing and one thing only that is absolutely required to stop inflation - the government has to stop printing excess money (more correctly referred to as currency). As long as this goes on, it doesn't matter what else is taking place. Governments almost without exception follow contradictory policies when inflation starts to get out of control. They will put on price and wage controls. They will try to limit capital outflow. They will try to prevent 'speculation'. They will try to lower the price of gold and silver with market manipulation. They will outlaw hoarding and black markets. They will do almost anything except printing less money and until they do, none of these other measures ever work.

More than once in his 'don't worry, the Fed has everything under control' article, Bernanke stated "economic conditions are not likely to warrant tighter monetary policy for an extended period". So the government doesn't even have the intention of printing less money. Even when it gets to the point that they know there is no other choice, they will either not do it or do it for a short time, realize it is damaging the economy, and then stop. This scenario has played out over and over again in the past. Central Banks always know that their excess money creation is causing inflation, but the economy becomes so addicted to their currency printing drug, it immediately goes into painful withdrawal when it's removed. Every central bank has the option of stopping the printing, just as Bernanke claims in his convoluted manner that the U.S. does now. But they don't do it.

As for claims that the economy is getting better, it is easy to engineer such statistics. Essentially economic activity consists of consumer spending, business spending and government spending. Increasing government spending by printing more money will improve the GDP numbers. If GDP gets better only because the government is spending more, it's highly inflationary. Better economic news is likely to be bad news. This issue wasn't discussed in the Bernanke article. Nor did he mention how he missed seeing the subprime crisis coming and how he subsequently mishandled ever aspect of it after its effects spread through the financial system. But NOW you can trust him. Yeahhhh, right.

NEXT: Dollar Watch; Bad Earnings are Good; Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bailout to Bailout - The Collapse and Rescue of Bear Stearns

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our video for this posting can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8Mn67rNCFQ

By March 10, 2008, rumors were flying everywhere on Wall Street that Bear Stearns was in trouble. In an attempt to counter these rumors, Bear's CEO released a statement to the press that the company had a sufficient liquidity cushion to weather the credit crisis. When a company is going under, it has no choice except to make such claims. Instead of being reassuring, this type of statement is an indication of serious trouble. After all, a sound company has no need to assure the public that its financial position is strong - and Bear Stearns was no exception. Insiders, of course, are not fooled by these proclamations, which are meant for the average investor. Indeed examination of options activity during Bear's last days shows heavy put buying that quickly turned into huge profits for those in the know.

According to an SEC report released the following week, Bear Stearns had a cash shortfall starting on March 11th, only one day after the CEO assured the public that Bear had sufficient liquidity. By the evening of March 13th, Bear was no longer a viable business and behind the scenes it was already working out the details of a bailout plan with the Fed. Ironically, if indeed it was a coincidence, earlier that day, S&P released a cheer-leading report heralding the end to subprime crisis write offs, which in turn led to a strong rally in U.S. financial stocks.

On Friday the 14th, Bear Stearns stock went into free fall. It closed at $30 a share, down from a high of over $171 at its peak in January 2007. Depending on the source, the book value for the company's stock was somewhere between $84 and $97 a share. The market obviously didn't agree and it would turn out the Fed's judgment was even more pessimistic. Nevertheless, after the close, the CEO stated in a conference call with investors that the book value was fundamentally unchanged. He also claimed that Bear's 'liquidity position had markedly deteriorated because of market rumors' indicating that management incompetence, the reporting of misleading financial figures, or that Bear actually being insolvent had nothing to do with the loss of faith in the company.

The CEO also announced an emergency 28-day loan from the U.S. Federal Reserve. The Fed had no real legal authority to assist Bear Stearns, so it funnelled the loan through JP Morgan, one of its member institutions. It justified its actions based on an obscure 1930s law that gives the Fed broad ability to grant loans to corporations in crisis conditions. During the weekend, the Fed would became even more proactive and Bear Stearns was no longer be an independent company when the markets opened again on Monday morning.

NEXT: Bailout to Bailout - The Bear Bailout and Its Aftermath

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

From Bailout to Bailout - The Prelude to Bear Stearns Collapse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our video on the material in this post is 'The Bear Stearns Bailout'. It can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8Mn67rNCFQ

The New York Investing meetup first mentioned in August 2007 that Bear Stearns was likely to fail. Two of Bear's hedge funds had gone under in late July and this helped t0 precipitate a sell off in the U.S. stock market by bringing media attention to the subprime crisis. Even though the subprime crisis had begun by at least December 2006 with the sudden failure of mid-sized mortgage lending company, the financial media failed to recognize its importance until the forced closure of the Bear Stearns funds. The precarious state of Bear Stearns finances that this failure indicated was in turn also missed by the U.S media. As usual, the media took its cues from Wall Street, which remained bullish on Bear Stearns right up to the very end (as was the case for Enron and a number of other major corporate failures).

Furthermore, the September 20, 2007 earnings report indicated everything was fine. Despite the failure of the two hedge funds, Bear Stearns claimed to have earned $1.16 a share. A write off of only $200 million (an insignificant amount for a Wall Street firm) was taken as a charge for closing the funds. Another $700 million of mortgage assets were also written down, also not that great an amount. In the earnings conference call, the CFO stated that he “expect[ed] a return to more favorable conditions next year”, stressed the underlying business was sound, and market dislocations tended to run a quarter or two. The only thing he was correct about was that the market dislocations would only last two more quarters - although he certainly didn't imply that this would be because Bear Stearns would no longer exist after that time.

While the September earnings report was reassuring, Bear Stearns December 20th earnings report was an indication of serious and possibly fatal problems. Suddenly, the company lost $6.90 a share, the first loss in its history (Bear was even profitable in every quarter during the Great Depression). Wall Street analysts were expecting a loss of only $1.79 a share, missing the actual loss by over $5.00 a share. The loss included only $1.9 billion of write downs in subprime mortgage exposure. Despite the indication that analysts had completely missed the extent of Bear Stearns problems, the stock actually went up after the earnings report, instead of sharply falling as it should have. The CEO subsequently 'resigned' - something that usually only takes place when a company is in trouble.

By December 2007, Bear Stearns was hardly unique in suffering losses because of the ever expanding credit crisis. The Federal Reserve attempted to address these system wide problems by creating its first new lending facility, the TAF (term auction facility), which gave it an additional conduit for its money pumping operations. In January 2008, reacting to the further deterioration in the financial system, the Fed cut its funds rate by an additional 1.25%. Bear Stearns, however, could not benefit directly from any of these moves since it was not a commercial bank and was therefore not allowed to borrow money from the Fed, so its situation continued to deteriorate.

Nevertheless, even as late as early March 2008, neither Wall Street, nor the media were ringing any alarm bells that Bear Stearns was about to implode. No Wall Street analyst had a sell recommendation on Bear Stearns stock even though it was about to lose almost all of its value. It apparently didn't bother them that the balance sheet indicated 33 times leverage, an amount that can only be described as enormous and which was greater than any other broker dealer or commercial bank. While the public facade that everything was fine was being maintained by Wall Street, rumors were circulating behind the scenes that Bear Stearns might go under. The big players were quietly getting their money out in what was basically a secret run on the bank.

NEXT: Bailout to Bailout - The Collapse and Rescue of Bear Stearns

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

Central Bankers Gone Wild

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

The New York Investing meetup has made a companion video to this blog entry. To see it, please go to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9kzKAzn2Ig

In the hundred years before the Federal Reserve existed, aggregate inflation in the United States was approximately zero. This does not mean that there was never any inflation, inflation did indeed exist, but that the periods of inflation were offset by periods of deflation so that over a long period of time there were essentially no changes in prices. A new era for inflation began when the Fed was created in 1913. Except for the Great Depression in the 1930s, deflation essentially disappeared from the United States economy and there were only periods of lower or higher inflation. This continuing inflation resulted in a 1923% inflation (based on understated official figures) for the first 95 years of the Fed's existence. Conversely, it could be said that the U.S. dollar had lost 95% of its value during this time. And the remaining 5% seemed to be endangered as well.

The beginning of 2008 saw what was probably the biggest injection of liquidity into the U.S. monetary system by the Fed in history. There were two massive rate cuts separated by only 8 days. First there was a 75 basis point cut in the Funds Rate on January 22nd and this was followed by a 50 basis point cut on January 30th. The previous time the Fed had cut rates by 75 basis points was when the Funds rate was at 20%. The January cut took place from a 4.25% level and was the first inter-meeting cut since the 9/11 crisis. Only two months later the Fed would again cut the Funds rate by another 75 basis point, this time from the 3.00% level. Based on the starting levels, the cuts in the Funds Rate was enormous and took place in a very brief span of time.

The cut in the Funds Rate was by no means all the liquidity that the Fed was pumping into the system. The TAF (Term Auction Facility) auctions were raised from $20 billion to $30 billion each by January and would reach $50 billion for each auction in March. Two additional auction facilities were added to the TAF by March - the TSLF and the PDCF. The TSLF (Term Security Lending Facility) was set up to swap $200 billion of treasuries for illiquid securities being held by the banks. The PDCF (Primary Dealer Credit Facility) opened the Fed's credit operations to the 20 firms that bought treasuries directly from it. The Fed had only lent money to commercial banks during its entire history and the PDCF represented a big extension from its traditional scope of operations.

The impact of the Fed's liquidity boosts caused the money supply to explode. MZM (money with zero maturity and therefore available for immediate use) grew by an over 37% annual rate in the first quarter of 2008. This would have been OK if the economy was expanding by around 37% as well, but the economy was contracting instead. The difference between money supply and economic growth was more than enough to create a massive future inflation problem and possibly even hyperinflation. How much inflation would actually take place was something only time would tell.

NEXT: The Fed's Manipulation of the Stock Market

Daryl Montgomery

Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please go to our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21