The Santa Claus Rally and the January Effect

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Santa Claus rally is a move up in stocks that takes place around December 25th. This rally was already part of Wall Street lore in the 1800s, and was memorialized in the ditty: 'If Santa fails to make a call, the bear will come to Broad and Wall'. There is no general agreement on the exact dates of the rally. It is defined as beginning from a few to several days before Christmas or immediately thereafter. It ends either in the current year or two or three days into the next year. It is most useful to think about it as two separate phenomenon. The first as the trading period around Christmas day and the second as the first four trading days of the new year. Each has its own message.

The bullishness in stocks around December 25th probably doesn't have much to do with the holiday per se, but with year end adjustments within the financial system. Instead of calling it the Santa Claus Rally, it would probably be more accurate to refer to it as the Year End Rally. If you look at long-term charts, you will note that the VIX, the volatility index, is either low or drops around the end of the most years. This is bullish for stocks. The VIX hit a yearly low on December 22nd in 2009 trading below 20 for the first time since the summer of 2008. An exceptionally low VIX while bullish in the short term sets the stock market up for eventual selling however.

What happens at the end of the year and at the beginning of the year can be quite different however and the two shouldn't be lumped together. Investment money tends to be reallocated at the beginning of a quarter and this is most pronounced in the first quarter. Investors should watch closely what sectors rally and what sectors of the market experience selling during the first four trading days of the year. This tells you where money is flowing. If the stock market overall sells off in the first four days, this is a bearish signal at least for the first quarter. It indicates big money is withdrawing its support from stocks.

The first four days trading signal is sometimes lumped in with the January Effect, but shouldn't be. The January Effect is a tendency for stocks to rally during the first month of the year, with small caps outperforming big and mid-caps. The January Effect was noted in the U.S. by the 1920s and perhaps even earlier. It has been observed in a number of stock markets throughout the world. The effect seems to have become dampened in recent years.

Trading volume tends to be low around the end of the year because many people are away because of the holidays. This can exaggerate price movements. Liquidity coming from the Fed and other central banks will have a more pronounced impact than usual. If you look at a chart for the U.S. Monetary Base, you will see that it has been rising vertically in the last few months. It is not surprising that the current liquidity fueled rally in stocks is continuing.

NEXT: NovaGold Leads Mining Group on Takeover

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

East Meets West, The Triumph of Communo-Capitalism

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

China lowered its interest rates last night for the fourth time since September. It's not yet close to zero interest rates like the U.S. and Japan, but will be be continuing to approach that level next year as will Great Britain. In China the government directly owns the banks and meddles in banking policy. While in the U.S. and Britain, it would be more appropriate to say that the banks own the government, or at least the central bank, and can directly meddle in the government policy that impacts them. In the end is there that much difference? The result is a financial system rife with corruption that engages in economically absurd behavior, which the government then has to bail out.

Final figures for third quarter GDP have just been released for the U.K. and the U.S. According to the official figures (take these with a big grain of salt and assume the reality is worse), the U.K. economy declined by 0.6% and the U.S. economy by 0.5% annualized last quarter. In the U.K. this is the biggest decline since the recession of the early 90s and in response the central bank has dropped interest rates to the lowest level since 1951. For the fourth quarter, a decline around 1.0% is expected in the U.K, while in the U.S. the consensus forecast is the economy will fall off a cliff with at least a 6.0% annualized drop - something worthy of a depression. As a reminder, both Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Paulson testified to congress in September that if the $700 billion Wall Street welfare bill, better known as TARP, wasn't passed, the U.S would face a severe recession. At the time, New York Investing said a severe recession was inevitable no matter what.

TARP is an example of fiscal profligacy, and while it is one of the worst examples, it is by no means the only one. Supporting all of the government's spending is the Fed's out of control money printing, which even mainstream economists are now starting to mention (better late than never I guess). Charts from the St. Louis Fed that New York Investing first showed in October are now getting some press attention. One of these charts, the U.S. Monetary Base shows an 86% increase during 2008, but around a 1000% increase annualized in the last 3 months. Another chart, Adjusted Reserves, shows this indicator exploding from $100 billion to $700 billion since mid-September. These charts (and around a dozen others) are so damaging that I am expecting they the numbers will either be 'adjusted' in the future or the Fed will stop making them available altogether as it did with M3 a few years ago.

While deflation is the headline issue today (based on very little reality), some economists are starting to point out that the Fed and the rest of the world's money printing central banks are going to have a lot of trouble draining all of this liquidity once there is economic recovery. History indicates that this indeed does not happen, but a hyperinflationary spiral is much more likely. This is just starting to dawn on some mainstream economists (but by no means all). The New York Investing meetup laid out this scenario in its September 2007 (yes, 2007) meeting -and so far events seem to be unfolding as predicted.

NEXT: Changes in Wall Street Firms That Led to the Credit Crisis

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Fed Should be Careful What It Wishes For

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Volatility is still the predominant feature of the U.S. stock market, with multi-hundred point moves being a daily occurrence on the Dow. For the moment, a Monday rally pattern seems to have replaced the Monday crash pattern that began in mid-September. The media reported yesterday's big move up in stocks as the market's approval of Fed chair Bernanke's endorsement of a new economic stimulus package. This of course makes no sense. The number of stimulus packages, special Fed lending facilities, special Fed asset purchasing programs, bailouts, bailout bills and government loans since the credit crisis began is now somewhere in the double digits - there have been so many, I've lost count. The need for more is just an admission of failure for all of the other initiatives, many of which were claimed to be just what was needed to turn things around. Apparently, the turning hasn't taken place yet.

The Fed announced even another new program this morning (for $540 billion this time). It will start buying commercial paper and dollar denominated CDs directly from money market funds. If you have been following this blog, you may have thought this was already being done. However, what was taking place is the Fed has been lending banks, a $123 billion so far, the money for this type of purchase. However, $341 billion has been withdrawn from money market funds by institutional investors since that program began. So the Fed has decided to eliminate the middleman (or more appropriately the middle-bank) and put an increased amount of funding behind this operation. This new program should not be confused with the one that begins on October 27th when the Fed will begin buying up to a trillion plus of commercial paper from an array of companies. The security of U.S. money market funds was supposed to have been assured about a month ago with the (legally questionable) establishment of a $50 billion dollar government insurance fund. It looks like things aren't exactly working as planned.

Today's country to announce the latest multi-billion dollar injection into its banking system is France. The French government will provide $14 billion in funding to the nations six largest banks. This appears to be part of their half a trillion bank rescue package announced several days ago. Between these two bailout announcements, French authorities were embarrassed once again with another bank trading scandal. Caisse d'Epargne announced an $800 million loss from derivative trading that allegedly took place because of rogue traders. It makes you wonder if there are there any controls on trading operations in French banks. Regardless, the biggest banks in France, just as in other advanced economies, will be assured of survival. Smaller and medium sized banks will be the ones taking the hit from the credit crisis.

The close to infinite liquidity being poured into the world's financial system is having the immediate desired effect of lowering interbank lending rates, which fell to their lowest level in a month yesterday. While the liquidity tsunami is good in the short-term, if successful it could lead to a very ugly long-term. Examination of a U.S. Adjusted Monetary Base chart shows a line going straight up (http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/BASE). This figure is currency in circulation, plus bank reserves and a massive increase in bank reserves is what is causing its vertical rise. Since banks are not lending at the moment, the inflationary effects will be muted from these additional reserves as long as the economy remains weak. A roaring economy where banks are lending out their reserves full stop would translate to an annual U.S. inflation rate somewhere around 2000% if the current rate of increase was maintained - and that would certainly make the stock market go up.

NEXT: Stock Market Enters the Bermuda Triangle

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.