The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
Fed Chair Ben Bernanke stated last night that he is 'hopeful' the U.S. economy will not fall into a double dip recession. After a tremendous drubbing on Friday, stocks somehow managed to sell down to even lower levels yesterday. They are down again this morning following Bernanke's comments - a fitting response to his forecasting acumen.
Few people in the United States seem to be as oblivious to the condition of the American economy as is the guy who is in charge of the Federal Reserve. Bernanke notoriously stated that subprime borrowing wouldn't cause any problems only weeks before it blew up into the biggest financial crisis the world has ever seen. Following this, the Fed released a number of statements in the spring of 2008 about how it was hopeful that its policies would prevent the U.S. economy from falling into a recession. Unfortunately, the economy had already fallen into recession months before, but the Fed was blissfully unaware of this even though it has more access to economic data than anyone else. The buffoonish Bernanke has been beating the drum of economic recovery for a long time now, even though analysis of U.S. statistics indicates the private sector is still struggling. The only recovery that seems to have taken place is in increased government spending.
At the moment, the markets don't seem to share Bernanke's rosy view of the future. The Dow dropped 115 points (1.2%) yesterday and most of the selling took place around the close, as is typical in bear markets. The Dow's ending price of 9816 was well below the key 10,000 level. The S&P 500 fell 14 points (1.4%) and closed at a new low for 2010, as did the Dow. Selling was even more pronounced in the tech heavy Nasdaq and the small cap Russell 2000. The Nasdaq lost 45 points (2.0%) and the Russell 15 points (2.4%). As of today, the Dow and S&P 500 have spent 13 trading days below their simple 200-day moving averages, a bearish pattern. Selling was also widespread with market breadth close to three to one negative on the NYSE.
The only areas of the market that did well yesterday were utilities, gold/ gold miners, and treasuries - safe havens. Financials were hit hard with Goldman Sachs (GS) falling 2.5% and Bank of America (BAC) losing 3.4%. U.S. bank failures have reached 81 so far this year and look like they are going to handily exceed 2009's very high figure. Credit card debt has fallen for 19 months in a row and May's employment report indicated private sector hiring has disappeared. Once the 1.2 million temporary Census workers are dismissed, the U.S. unemployment rate should go above 10%. These are not signs of economic recovery and yet the Fed chair keeps spouting one cheerleading remark after another about how recovery is taking place. Herbert Hoover did the same thing in the early 1930s as the Great Depression was developing. Consequently, he is now treated as a historical laughingstock. History may take the same view of Ben Bernanke.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Market Sells Off Even Though Bernanke Is Bullish
Labels:
200-day moving average,
BAC,
bear market,
Ben Bernanke,
Dow,
Fed Chair,
gold,
gold miners,
GS,
Herbert Hoover,
meetup,
Nasdaq,
New York Investing,
Russell 2000,
S and P 500,
utilities
Monday, June 7, 2010
Markets Trading Like They Did During Credit Crisis
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
Stocks are selling off globally. Commodities are down, but gold is holding up the best. Money is pouring into the perceived safe havens, the U.S. dollar and treasuries. Is it the late fall of 2008 or late spring of 2010?
Without further information, you can't answer that question. There is a global financial crisis occurring now because of the problems with the euro. There was a global financial crisis in 2008 because of the collapse of the prices of derivatives related to subprime mortgages. The problems with subprime debt had begun the year before and started impacting stocks in July 2007. Stocks were already in an advanced bear market sell off by the fall of 2008. The current euro crisis is only a few months old and U.S. stocks are only in a correction so far (loss of over 10% versus loss of over 20% for a bear market).
The current stock market sell off is worldwide as it was in 2008. It goes without saying the stocks in the eurozone are suffering, but technical damage can be found in major markets everywhere. The Dow Jones has broken key support at 10,000 twice already. The Nikkei gave up its significant 10,000 level a while ago, closing at 9521 last night. The Hang Seng has fallen below important support at 20,000, dropping to 19,378. In the UK, the FTSE is barely holding above 5,000 today.
The trade-weighted dollar (DXY) was as high as 88.71 in New York this morning (June 7th). This is higher than its peak in November 2008, but not as high as the top in March 2009. There was a major sell off in the middle, with the euro (FXE) having a sharp rally. Something similar is likely to happen early this summer. The dollar is very overbought and the euro is very oversold. The euro has traded as low as 1.1878 today. It may pop back up to the 120 support level and if not, there is stronger support around 115. The dollar is already hitting major resistance, so the set up for a short-term reversal looks like it is taking place.
As would be expected, U.S. treasuries have rallied strongly during the euro crisis. It is highly unlikely that they will get to the extremely low levels they did in 2008. As treasuries rally, interest rates go down of course. Interest rates on the 10-year fell to around 2.00% in December 2008. They were at 3.18% this morning. There is strong chart support at and just above the 3.00% level. So not much more of a treasury rally, interest rate sell off should be expected for now.
Currently gold has recaptured its safe haven status. It was selling off with the euro between last December and this February. Then it started rallying with the U.S. dollar, although it usually trades opposite to the dollar. Gold sold down in the fall of 2008. Central bank leasing was responsible for this. The big banks and large hedge funds leased gold at a small price and then sold it on the market to raise desperately needed cash. This is not happening at the moment to a significant enough degree that it can offset buying elsewhere. Ironically, a sharp relief rally in the euro could be short-term bearish for gold. Despite the selling in the fall of 2008, gold still closed the year up along with the U.S. dollar and U.S. treasuries. Almost every other asset closed down. It's still too early to tell if 2010 will end the same way.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Stocks are selling off globally. Commodities are down, but gold is holding up the best. Money is pouring into the perceived safe havens, the U.S. dollar and treasuries. Is it the late fall of 2008 or late spring of 2010?
Without further information, you can't answer that question. There is a global financial crisis occurring now because of the problems with the euro. There was a global financial crisis in 2008 because of the collapse of the prices of derivatives related to subprime mortgages. The problems with subprime debt had begun the year before and started impacting stocks in July 2007. Stocks were already in an advanced bear market sell off by the fall of 2008. The current euro crisis is only a few months old and U.S. stocks are only in a correction so far (loss of over 10% versus loss of over 20% for a bear market).
The current stock market sell off is worldwide as it was in 2008. It goes without saying the stocks in the eurozone are suffering, but technical damage can be found in major markets everywhere. The Dow Jones has broken key support at 10,000 twice already. The Nikkei gave up its significant 10,000 level a while ago, closing at 9521 last night. The Hang Seng has fallen below important support at 20,000, dropping to 19,378. In the UK, the FTSE is barely holding above 5,000 today.
The trade-weighted dollar (DXY) was as high as 88.71 in New York this morning (June 7th). This is higher than its peak in November 2008, but not as high as the top in March 2009. There was a major sell off in the middle, with the euro (FXE) having a sharp rally. Something similar is likely to happen early this summer. The dollar is very overbought and the euro is very oversold. The euro has traded as low as 1.1878 today. It may pop back up to the 120 support level and if not, there is stronger support around 115. The dollar is already hitting major resistance, so the set up for a short-term reversal looks like it is taking place.
As would be expected, U.S. treasuries have rallied strongly during the euro crisis. It is highly unlikely that they will get to the extremely low levels they did in 2008. As treasuries rally, interest rates go down of course. Interest rates on the 10-year fell to around 2.00% in December 2008. They were at 3.18% this morning. There is strong chart support at and just above the 3.00% level. So not much more of a treasury rally, interest rate sell off should be expected for now.
Currently gold has recaptured its safe haven status. It was selling off with the euro between last December and this February. Then it started rallying with the U.S. dollar, although it usually trades opposite to the dollar. Gold sold down in the fall of 2008. Central bank leasing was responsible for this. The big banks and large hedge funds leased gold at a small price and then sold it on the market to raise desperately needed cash. This is not happening at the moment to a significant enough degree that it can offset buying elsewhere. Ironically, a sharp relief rally in the euro could be short-term bearish for gold. Despite the selling in the fall of 2008, gold still closed the year up along with the U.S. dollar and U.S. treasuries. Almost every other asset closed down. It's still too early to tell if 2010 will end the same way.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Friday, June 4, 2010
First of the Month Indicator Gives Bear Market Signal
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
It was a horrendous day in the markets on Friday June 4th. Trouble began when the euro broke support and selling then spread from Europe to North America. A disappointing U.S. jobs report added to the downward pressure and stocks sank. The small cap Russell 2000 had a mini-crash. The first four trading days of the month were down for the second month in a row, indicating we have established a bear market trading pattern.
Problems began in Europe with rumors of a possible default of a major French bank. Another European country, Hungary, indicated its finances were in trouble. The euro (FXE) fell below the key 1.20 level and traded as low as 1.1919 taken out the 1.1920 low in March 2006. Adding to the woes in Europe was the May employment report that came in well below expectations. Almost all the jobs added were from Census hiring and those jobs will disappear almost as quickly as they appeared. U.S. markets gapped down on the open.
Selling in U.S. stocks was almost continuous throughout the day. By the close, the Dow was down 323 points or 3.2%. The S&P 500 dropped 38 points or 3.4%. Nasdaq was worse still, losing 84 points of 3.6%. The Russell 2000 though gave up 33 points or 5.0%. The rule of thumb is a 5.0% drop in one day is a mini-crash. The Dow closed at 9932, which is the second recent close below the key 10,000 level. This one took place on Friday, so it appears as a loss of technical strength on the weakly charts, a more serious problem than if it had occurred just on the daily charts as was previously the case.
Even worse was that all four major indices were down for the first four trading days of the month. This is a typical bear market pattern. It does occasionally happen in bull market rallies though, so to be significant there needs to be two months in a row with a loss in the first four trading days. May also saw just such a loss, so the two down months in a row have now taken place. A bear market doesn't mean the market isn't going to go up again. Bear markets are known for their sharp and sudden short covering rallies. Traditionally, it means that traders should switch to shorting the rallies instead of buying the dips. Adept short-term traders can of course play the market both ways.
Classic market watchers will not consider stocks to be in a bear market until they've lost 20% of their value. Investors of course should never accept that type of loss. By the time that confirmation takes place; a lot of money is already gone from your brokerage account. So far, the Dow is down 11.5%, the S&P 500 12.5%, the Nasdaq 12.3% and the Russell 2000 15.0% from their respective peaks. Market observers agree that this is a correction because all the indices are down more than 10%. Informing investors of how much they've lost after the fact is not particularly helpful. The idea is to avoid these events before they take place. If you check, you will see I published a number of articles warning of the sell off before it started.
Disclosure: No positions
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
It was a horrendous day in the markets on Friday June 4th. Trouble began when the euro broke support and selling then spread from Europe to North America. A disappointing U.S. jobs report added to the downward pressure and stocks sank. The small cap Russell 2000 had a mini-crash. The first four trading days of the month were down for the second month in a row, indicating we have established a bear market trading pattern.
Problems began in Europe with rumors of a possible default of a major French bank. Another European country, Hungary, indicated its finances were in trouble. The euro (FXE) fell below the key 1.20 level and traded as low as 1.1919 taken out the 1.1920 low in March 2006. Adding to the woes in Europe was the May employment report that came in well below expectations. Almost all the jobs added were from Census hiring and those jobs will disappear almost as quickly as they appeared. U.S. markets gapped down on the open.
Selling in U.S. stocks was almost continuous throughout the day. By the close, the Dow was down 323 points or 3.2%. The S&P 500 dropped 38 points or 3.4%. Nasdaq was worse still, losing 84 points of 3.6%. The Russell 2000 though gave up 33 points or 5.0%. The rule of thumb is a 5.0% drop in one day is a mini-crash. The Dow closed at 9932, which is the second recent close below the key 10,000 level. This one took place on Friday, so it appears as a loss of technical strength on the weakly charts, a more serious problem than if it had occurred just on the daily charts as was previously the case.
Even worse was that all four major indices were down for the first four trading days of the month. This is a typical bear market pattern. It does occasionally happen in bull market rallies though, so to be significant there needs to be two months in a row with a loss in the first four trading days. May also saw just such a loss, so the two down months in a row have now taken place. A bear market doesn't mean the market isn't going to go up again. Bear markets are known for their sharp and sudden short covering rallies. Traditionally, it means that traders should switch to shorting the rallies instead of buying the dips. Adept short-term traders can of course play the market both ways.
Classic market watchers will not consider stocks to be in a bear market until they've lost 20% of their value. Investors of course should never accept that type of loss. By the time that confirmation takes place; a lot of money is already gone from your brokerage account. So far, the Dow is down 11.5%, the S&P 500 12.5%, the Nasdaq 12.3% and the Russell 2000 15.0% from their respective peaks. Market observers agree that this is a correction because all the indices are down more than 10%. Informing investors of how much they've lost after the fact is not particularly helpful. The idea is to avoid these events before they take place. If you check, you will see I published a number of articles warning of the sell off before it started.
Disclosure: No positions
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Labels:
bear market,
dollar,
Dow Jones Industrial,
Employment report,
euro,
first trading days,
fxe,
Hungary,
May,
meetup,
mini-crash,
Nasdaq,
New York Investing,
Russell 2000,
S and P 500,
signal
May Employment Report Indicates Economy in Trouble
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
According to the May monthly employment report, 431,000 jobs were created last month. Unfortunately, almost all of these jobs were temporary Census positions. Private sector hiring was dead in the water.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) further stated that the unemployment rate in May fell to 9.7% from 9.9% in April. The massive addition of Census jobs, which only last a short time, was behind much of the drop. The BLS also claimed that 286,000 people left the labor force. Those people are not counted as unemployed. The May unemployment rate that includes workers still in the labor force, but who didn't look for a job in the previous four weeks, and those who are forced to work part-time because no full time job is available was 16.6% (seasonally adjusted). Long-term unemployed reached 6.8 million in May and this group of the unemployed accounted for 46% of the total - worse than any previous post War recession.
The jobs reports for March and April were heralded as evidence that the U.S. economy was recovering. The May report indicates that judgment seems to have been premature. As an example, Construction lost 35,000 jobs in May and this reversed much of the gains reported in the prior two months. Mining and Heath Care were the two big gainers in May, adding 10,000 and 8,000 jobs respectively. Health Care has been the only sector to continually add jobs since the recession began in December 2007.
The job gains reported by the BLS during the last year have been disproportionately accounted for by Census hiring. The BLS has of course not admitted this since it would undermine the U.S. government's claim of a recovering economy. In March, I reported how the BLS seemed to be placing Census jobs in the Business and Professional Service category. Within the last week, John Crudele of the New York Post has written a series of articles documenting how the Census has hired and fired workers up to four times and by doing so managed to create a 'new' job each time. The Financial Times in London estimated the U.S. was hiring 1.2 million Census workers for the 2010 count, whereas only 600,000 were needed in 2000. The Census has not only been used as a covert government jobs program, but hiring and firing since the second half of 2009 has been done is such a way as to inflate the total Non-Farm Payroll numbers. Moreover, Census supervisor jobs seem to have been listed in such a way as to make it look like businesses and not government was doing the hiring.
The May employment report indicates that there is little hiring activity going on in the private sector. This is the case even though the federal government has spent trillions on bailouts and economic recovery measures during the last two years. This money has essentially kept the U.S. economy from collapse, but it has not created the promised growth. How much longer can this game go on? It will be interesting to see what happens to the job numbers in the next few months when more than a million Census jobs disappear.
Disclosure: No positions
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
According to the May monthly employment report, 431,000 jobs were created last month. Unfortunately, almost all of these jobs were temporary Census positions. Private sector hiring was dead in the water.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) further stated that the unemployment rate in May fell to 9.7% from 9.9% in April. The massive addition of Census jobs, which only last a short time, was behind much of the drop. The BLS also claimed that 286,000 people left the labor force. Those people are not counted as unemployed. The May unemployment rate that includes workers still in the labor force, but who didn't look for a job in the previous four weeks, and those who are forced to work part-time because no full time job is available was 16.6% (seasonally adjusted). Long-term unemployed reached 6.8 million in May and this group of the unemployed accounted for 46% of the total - worse than any previous post War recession.
The jobs reports for March and April were heralded as evidence that the U.S. economy was recovering. The May report indicates that judgment seems to have been premature. As an example, Construction lost 35,000 jobs in May and this reversed much of the gains reported in the prior two months. Mining and Heath Care were the two big gainers in May, adding 10,000 and 8,000 jobs respectively. Health Care has been the only sector to continually add jobs since the recession began in December 2007.
The job gains reported by the BLS during the last year have been disproportionately accounted for by Census hiring. The BLS has of course not admitted this since it would undermine the U.S. government's claim of a recovering economy. In March, I reported how the BLS seemed to be placing Census jobs in the Business and Professional Service category. Within the last week, John Crudele of the New York Post has written a series of articles documenting how the Census has hired and fired workers up to four times and by doing so managed to create a 'new' job each time. The Financial Times in London estimated the U.S. was hiring 1.2 million Census workers for the 2010 count, whereas only 600,000 were needed in 2000. The Census has not only been used as a covert government jobs program, but hiring and firing since the second half of 2009 has been done is such a way as to inflate the total Non-Farm Payroll numbers. Moreover, Census supervisor jobs seem to have been listed in such a way as to make it look like businesses and not government was doing the hiring.
The May employment report indicates that there is little hiring activity going on in the private sector. This is the case even though the federal government has spent trillions on bailouts and economic recovery measures during the last two years. This money has essentially kept the U.S. economy from collapse, but it has not created the promised growth. How much longer can this game go on? It will be interesting to see what happens to the job numbers in the next few months when more than a million Census jobs disappear.
Disclosure: No positions
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Some Curiosities in Wednesday's Market Rally
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
U.S. stocks had a big rally yesterday with a surge starting at approximately 2:20PM New York time. This rally was counter to the direction of the news flow and had many of the earmarks of central bank intervention.
Central banks will pump liquidity into the global financial system to prop it up at key points (informed cynics would use the word manipulate and might cite the U.S. Plunge Protection Team as the source of these activities). A recent example of this was the ECB's huge injection on the morning of May 10th, which caused an explosive rally for U.S. stocks on the open. Draining the liquidity the following week caused the market to drop back down again however. These central bank activities would therefore be more accurately be described as massive pump and dump operations. If a stock manipulator in the U.S. was caught doing this, he or she would go to jail. Governments though don't think they have to follow the rules they make for the little people.
A big liquidity injection will usually take almost all stocks up, even some highly improbable ones. Currently stocks related to the BP oil spill off the Louisiana coast would be the best examples of this. PB had has a series of failed attempts at controlling the massive leak that is now threatening Florida beaches. Its Operation Saw effort failed yesterday when the riser package got jammed and this could be seen through a live feed on the Internet (the saw now seems to have been freed). The situation has become so bad that Internet buzz is starting to question BP's survival. The lawsuits against the company keep escalating and some of the potentially biggest ones aren't even on the company's radar screen yet.
On this continual wave of bad news, how did the companies connected to the oil spill perform in yesterday's market? British Petroleum (BP) was up 3.0%. Anadarko (APC), which owns 25% of the operation, was up 5.1%. Cameron International (CAM), the provider of the failed blowout converter, was up 7.0%. Halliburton did the best of all rising 10.7%. Only Transocean (RIG) was down, falling 3.5% (although it is up by 3.5% as this is being written). Interestingly, I saw mainstream news reports that only cited the drop in Transocean stock and ignored the huge and rather inexplicable gains for the other companies.
The timing of yesterday's rally was also a bit too convenient. President Obama gave a speech on the state of the U.S. economy in Pittsburgh that ended around 2:20PM. As the speech ended, critical commentary was hitting the news wires about how his efforts to fix it have failed. Obama's February 2009 almost $1 trillion stimulus package for instance was supposed to keep unemployment from rising to 8.5% and it is now 9.9% more than a year later. Without the hiring of 1.2 million temporary census workers (twice the number used in 2000) unemployment would be significantly worse. Nevertheless, the market took off in a huge rally as the speech ended. This well-timed ringing endorsement from Wall Street of Washington's failed policies could have been mere coincidence or the invisible hand of the Federal Reserve acting behind the scenes.
During the Credit Crisis in 2008 the market constantly had big up and down days. As time went on stocks continued their downward slant because the up days were always undone within a week or so. Only when the market finally calmed down in March 2009 was a sustainable rally possible. Volatility began rising in 2007 though and the early increases, similar to the ones taking place now, were merely a warning of much worse things to come the following year.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
U.S. stocks had a big rally yesterday with a surge starting at approximately 2:20PM New York time. This rally was counter to the direction of the news flow and had many of the earmarks of central bank intervention.
Central banks will pump liquidity into the global financial system to prop it up at key points (informed cynics would use the word manipulate and might cite the U.S. Plunge Protection Team as the source of these activities). A recent example of this was the ECB's huge injection on the morning of May 10th, which caused an explosive rally for U.S. stocks on the open. Draining the liquidity the following week caused the market to drop back down again however. These central bank activities would therefore be more accurately be described as massive pump and dump operations. If a stock manipulator in the U.S. was caught doing this, he or she would go to jail. Governments though don't think they have to follow the rules they make for the little people.
A big liquidity injection will usually take almost all stocks up, even some highly improbable ones. Currently stocks related to the BP oil spill off the Louisiana coast would be the best examples of this. PB had has a series of failed attempts at controlling the massive leak that is now threatening Florida beaches. Its Operation Saw effort failed yesterday when the riser package got jammed and this could be seen through a live feed on the Internet (the saw now seems to have been freed). The situation has become so bad that Internet buzz is starting to question BP's survival. The lawsuits against the company keep escalating and some of the potentially biggest ones aren't even on the company's radar screen yet.
On this continual wave of bad news, how did the companies connected to the oil spill perform in yesterday's market? British Petroleum (BP) was up 3.0%. Anadarko (APC), which owns 25% of the operation, was up 5.1%. Cameron International (CAM), the provider of the failed blowout converter, was up 7.0%. Halliburton did the best of all rising 10.7%. Only Transocean (RIG) was down, falling 3.5% (although it is up by 3.5% as this is being written). Interestingly, I saw mainstream news reports that only cited the drop in Transocean stock and ignored the huge and rather inexplicable gains for the other companies.
The timing of yesterday's rally was also a bit too convenient. President Obama gave a speech on the state of the U.S. economy in Pittsburgh that ended around 2:20PM. As the speech ended, critical commentary was hitting the news wires about how his efforts to fix it have failed. Obama's February 2009 almost $1 trillion stimulus package for instance was supposed to keep unemployment from rising to 8.5% and it is now 9.9% more than a year later. Without the hiring of 1.2 million temporary census workers (twice the number used in 2000) unemployment would be significantly worse. Nevertheless, the market took off in a huge rally as the speech ended. This well-timed ringing endorsement from Wall Street of Washington's failed policies could have been mere coincidence or the invisible hand of the Federal Reserve acting behind the scenes.
During the Credit Crisis in 2008 the market constantly had big up and down days. As time went on stocks continued their downward slant because the up days were always undone within a week or so. Only when the market finally calmed down in March 2009 was a sustainable rally possible. Volatility began rising in 2007 though and the early increases, similar to the ones taking place now, were merely a warning of much worse things to come the following year.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Labels:
2009 Economic Stimulus,
APC,
BP,
CAM,
central bank,
credit crisis,
Fed,
Gulf oil spill,
HAL,
intervention,
meetup,
New York Investing,
Obama,
plunge protection team,
RIG,
volatility
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
June Begins With Continued Market Weakness
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
After a sharp drop on the open, U.S. stocks mounted a rally and remained positive for most of the day. Selling toward the close, a classic bear-trading pattern, clocked the rally however. Small caps were hit particularly hard.
Healthy markets are strong in the beginning of the month. Trading days before major holidays, like Memorial Day, also tend to be positive. Last Friday was a down day however as was the first of June. Bull markets also tend to be weaker in the morning and stronger at the close, when professionals control the market. The market's attempt to follow this pattern failed miserably yesterday. It was also not the first time lately that strong selling occurred toward the end of trading.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1.1% or 113 points. It barely held the key 10,000 level, with the low of the day at 10,014. As of June 1st, the Dow has spent time below its 200-day simple moving average for eight days in a row, as has the S&P 500. The S&P was hit harder than the Dow, falling 1.8% or 19 points. Nasdaq, which tends to be more volatile, lost only 1.6% or 35 points. Nasdaq had been trading completely above its 200-day at the end of May, but closed a tinge below it yesterday (this can only be considered bearish). Small caps experienced the biggest damage by far though, with a loss of 3.2% or 21 points on the Russell 2000. Nevertheless, the Russell held above its 200-day line and is still technically in the best shape of all the major U.S. stock indices.
The euro (FXE), which has been the driver for market behavior for months now, moved mostly with the markets yesterday. Sharp selling on the open and quick recovery just like stocks, but then a slow fade for the rest of the trading day. The euro's loss of momentum was an early warning that stocks would be doing the same later on. The euro closed at 122.03 with an intraday low of 121.51. Its low in the sell off so far has been 121.27. There is support around the 120 level. The trade-weighted U.S. dollar on the other hand has resistance around 88 and closed just above 86.75. During the 2008 Credit Crisis, the euro spent seven weeks around the 125 level and then had an explosive relief rally. We should be seeing just such a rally again sometime during the summer. It will likely fade right back to the low after a number of weeks, as was the case in early 2009. This time the euro may even go lower.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
After a sharp drop on the open, U.S. stocks mounted a rally and remained positive for most of the day. Selling toward the close, a classic bear-trading pattern, clocked the rally however. Small caps were hit particularly hard.
Healthy markets are strong in the beginning of the month. Trading days before major holidays, like Memorial Day, also tend to be positive. Last Friday was a down day however as was the first of June. Bull markets also tend to be weaker in the morning and stronger at the close, when professionals control the market. The market's attempt to follow this pattern failed miserably yesterday. It was also not the first time lately that strong selling occurred toward the end of trading.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1.1% or 113 points. It barely held the key 10,000 level, with the low of the day at 10,014. As of June 1st, the Dow has spent time below its 200-day simple moving average for eight days in a row, as has the S&P 500. The S&P was hit harder than the Dow, falling 1.8% or 19 points. Nasdaq, which tends to be more volatile, lost only 1.6% or 35 points. Nasdaq had been trading completely above its 200-day at the end of May, but closed a tinge below it yesterday (this can only be considered bearish). Small caps experienced the biggest damage by far though, with a loss of 3.2% or 21 points on the Russell 2000. Nevertheless, the Russell held above its 200-day line and is still technically in the best shape of all the major U.S. stock indices.
The euro (FXE), which has been the driver for market behavior for months now, moved mostly with the markets yesterday. Sharp selling on the open and quick recovery just like stocks, but then a slow fade for the rest of the trading day. The euro's loss of momentum was an early warning that stocks would be doing the same later on. The euro closed at 122.03 with an intraday low of 121.51. Its low in the sell off so far has been 121.27. There is support around the 120 level. The trade-weighted U.S. dollar on the other hand has resistance around 88 and closed just above 86.75. During the 2008 Credit Crisis, the euro spent seven weeks around the 125 level and then had an explosive relief rally. We should be seeing just such a rally again sometime during the summer. It will likely fade right back to the low after a number of weeks, as was the case in early 2009. This time the euro may even go lower.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Labels:
200-day moving average,
credit crisis,
dollar,
Dow Jones,
euro,
meetup,
Nasdaq,
New York Investing,
Russell 2000,
S and P 500,
small caps,
stock market,
trade-weighted
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
One Way to Tell if We Are in a Bear Market
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
Bull markets usually go up the first four trading days of the month. After giving a strong negative signal in May, investors should be watching this indicator in the early days of June. A second negative signal would be a confirmation that a new bear market has begun.
Money tends to get reallocated at the beginning of the month. The behavior is more pronounced at the beginning of the quarter and most pronounced at the beginning of the year. In bull markets, much of this money gets allocated on the buy side for stocks. In bears markets, a higher percentage of investing money will go to safe haven assets. So in a bull market the first four trading days (not five as many sources claim) of the month tend to see a nice rise in stock prices. The first couple of days are almost always positive.
Even in strong bull markets, not every month has to have an up move in the beginning days. Every so many months, investors are likely to grow cautious and take some profits. The bulls should regain control for the next several months however before profits get high enough again so that investors want to take some money off the table. So far, the rally that began in March 2009 has managed to just hold together.
The first negative signal for the rally was given in July 2009 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The next month was positive though and then another negative signal was given in early September. This was followed by a number of months that when stocks were up in the first four days. Then February 2010 gave another negative signal. March and April were once again OK and then came May. The flash crash happened on the fourth trading day of May and the market was already down before it occurred. May was an ugly month.
Four negative signals on the first four trading days of the month indicator are a lot in just over a year. It indicates a rally that has weak underpinnings (as does the falling volume on the Dow during most of the rally). We still have not as of yet seen negative signals two months in a row. Maybe we will by June 4th. If we do, it would be strong evidence that a new bear market has begun.
Disclosure: None.
Daryl Montgomery Organizer,
New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Bull markets usually go up the first four trading days of the month. After giving a strong negative signal in May, investors should be watching this indicator in the early days of June. A second negative signal would be a confirmation that a new bear market has begun.
Money tends to get reallocated at the beginning of the month. The behavior is more pronounced at the beginning of the quarter and most pronounced at the beginning of the year. In bull markets, much of this money gets allocated on the buy side for stocks. In bears markets, a higher percentage of investing money will go to safe haven assets. So in a bull market the first four trading days (not five as many sources claim) of the month tend to see a nice rise in stock prices. The first couple of days are almost always positive.
Even in strong bull markets, not every month has to have an up move in the beginning days. Every so many months, investors are likely to grow cautious and take some profits. The bulls should regain control for the next several months however before profits get high enough again so that investors want to take some money off the table. So far, the rally that began in March 2009 has managed to just hold together.
The first negative signal for the rally was given in July 2009 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The next month was positive though and then another negative signal was given in early September. This was followed by a number of months that when stocks were up in the first four days. Then February 2010 gave another negative signal. March and April were once again OK and then came May. The flash crash happened on the fourth trading day of May and the market was already down before it occurred. May was an ugly month.
Four negative signals on the first four trading days of the month indicator are a lot in just over a year. It indicates a rally that has weak underpinnings (as does the falling volume on the Dow during most of the rally). We still have not as of yet seen negative signals two months in a row. Maybe we will by June 4th. If we do, it would be strong evidence that a new bear market has begun.
Disclosure: None.
Daryl Montgomery Organizer,
New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






