Showing posts with label expectations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label expectations. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Ben Bernanke's 'It's Not My Fault' Inflation Speech

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.



Americans shouldn’t expect to hear the truth about inflation from Fed Chief Ben Bernanke and he didn't disappoint in a speech he gave to the International Monetary Conference in Atlanta, Georgia on Monday. The money-printer-in-chief of the Federal Reserve denied that the Fed’s easy money policies are responsible for the inflation that is currently showing up in commodity prices. The public shouldn’t have expected anything else from the dissembling Fed Chair, nor should they believe anything he says.

Bernanke claims that rapidly rising commodity prices are the result of rising demand and not enough supply. While in isolation this is always the case in economics, it doesn’t explain why demand is rising in leaps and bounds and why this has occurred at the same time the Fed has been on a money printing binge. Bernanke did not make comparisons in his speech between demand and prices in 2008, when the Fed turned up the printing presses to max and conditions right now. Let’s look at a few of them:  U.S. gasoline prices went from approximately $1.60 a gallon to almost $4.00. Oil prices have tripled from a low around $33 a barrel. Copper prices almost tripled during the same period. Cotton prices have gone through the roof and took out a high established around 150 years ago. Silver prices went from a low of $8.88 to almost $50.  And that’s just the beginning.
Did global demand for oil, copper, and silver increase by three or more times in two and a half years?  It most certainly did not. If anything economic demand has only increased by a few percent at most. There is something that did increase by a lot more however – the Fed’s balance sheet, which grows when it prints money. That has gone through the roof just like commodity prices. Money printing of course increases demand for any number of items because it makes a lot more funds available in the financial system. For some reason, Bernanke didn’t quite connect the dots between the two in his speech.
The recognition that increasing the available money in the economy leads to rising prices has been known for 500 years and was first proposed by well-known astronomer Copernicus. The idea is based on grade-school arithmetic. If you have an economy of a certain size and a given amount of money and you increase that amount of money, then each unit of money is worth less. It’s not rocket science, and yet Fed officials with PhDs from top schools can’t seem to be able to grasp this simple concept. Or perhaps they don’t want to do so.
Bernanke’s speech also didn’t explain why the price of gold has doubled since its Credit Crisis low. While gold does have some industrial uses, its price is a good gage of inflation expectations on the part of the investing public. Bernanke claimed these were under control, so we don’t have to worry about inflation. Gold is telling a very different story – and gold is not known to lie.
Bernanke also fell back on the 'employment is high and there is slack in the economy, so inflation can’t happen' argument. Historical analysis indicates that hyperinflation takes place under just such conditions. The most recent example happened in Zimbabwe in the 2000s (perhaps Ben didn’t read the papers during those years). As the economy collapsed and unemployment headed toward close to 100%, prices skyrocketed. It wasn’t the first time something like this has happened, it’s the same story over and over and over again throughout history – yet Ben keeps telling us it can’t happen. Well, I guess if you don’t let little things like reality intrude in your worldview, it can’t.
As an author of a book which includes a lot of material on inflation history, I found no case in the past where the authorities admitted their guilt in causing inflation. In every instance, the government printed a lot money or cut the coinage (if it was before paper money existed). Without exception in modern times, speculators and foreign influences are blamed for inflation. For some reason the government money-printers behind the inflation that ruins their countries just never seem to admit that they’re at fault. Bernanke’s recent speech is just another example of history repeating itself.   

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
Author, "Inflation Investing: A Guide for the 2010s"

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Look for the Gaps

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gaps, in more ways than one, are the key to making money in this market. Gaps in logic of the media coverage and gaps in stock charts. We are at the peak of first quarter earnings season this week and you are seeing one media report after another with glaring headlines about how earnings are down for major companies as if somehow this is a surprise. What exactly was the press expecting to happen during the worst economic downturn since the 1930s? I am actually surprised that earnings are not down much more. The news is also leading to stock prices that gap up and down - sometimes two or three times in a week. This amount of choppy trading is unusual, but is great for making money trading, since gaps frequently get filled shortly after they are made.

Today we had earnings from big caps United Technologies (UTX), Dupont (DD) and Caterpillar (CAT). Earnings for United Technologies were down 28% and my reaction in contrast to the media's was, "Is that all?". Highly cyclical DuPont's earnings were down 59% and Caterpillar had a loss because of write offs. All of these stocks had have significant drops from their highs with CAT having fallen around 75% just in the last year alone. All in all, I would say the market has been anticipating a lot of bad news for a long time and has priced it into these stocks (and almost every other stock in the market for that matter). But does the media report, 'things not so bad, considering'? Not at all. The press coverage reads like the funeral scene from a Greek tragedy. You will also not read in most of the reports that these stocks are well off their lows. Why is that if things are going to be so bad in the future - the only thing the market cares about?

Hysterical media coverage is leading to short term panic selling on many stocks (and sometimes panic buying is taking place by the contrarians who are seeing the incredible bargains being made available). This has created very choppy charts that are filled with gaps. Unless you have a breakaway gap - a sudden move up (or down) to a new trading range, gaps usually get filled in the short term. When a stock has gapped down, it is likely to fill the gap on the upside later, so you can buy and wait for this to happen (two gaps down is an even better deal, usually rare, but common these days). I have also seen two or three gaps up. The stock is likely to fall and fill these gaps - and then you buy for usually handsome profits.

Helpful advice on making money in the market will almost never appear in the media (it is likely an accident if it does). What investors are more likely to get is this quote that appeared today from Noriel Roubini: "For people who say there are green shoots, I see only yellow weeds frankly," Roubini said from a conference in Hong Kong Tuesday. "It's not a true recovery. It's just a bear-market rally, it's a suckers rally." Roubini is an economist and not an expert on the stock market, so why is he being quoted. Has he ever made any money trading stocks? My guess is no.

NEXT: If It's Wednesday, It's the Oil Storage Report

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.