Silver Crashes; Gold Breaks Key Support

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The silver market had a major crash on Friday -- there is simply no other way to put it. Spot prices were down as much as 17.1% or $6.18 an ounce. Gold was damaged as well, but not nearly as much. At its worst, it was down 6.3% or $108.60 an ounce. Both gold and silver traded below previous lows set earlier this year.

The drop in silver was truly spectacular. It was down by double digit amounts on Thursday and then by an even  greater amount today. The main silver ETF, SLV, has two huge gaps on its chart. The spot price low of $29.76 reached an area of major support. There is chart support, moving average support and a Fibonacci retracement at that level. A tradable bounce should take place soon and the gap in the chart from today is likely to be covered in that move. Those with a longer-term investing horizon might want to wait before buying. The next level to keep an eye on is around $26 where there is chart support and another Fibonacci retracement.

The silver selloff is much more advanced than is the one for gold. Silver peaked in April and had its first big selloff in May. It made a double bottom in May and July and didn't trade below those levels until today. Gold on the other hand made a double top in mid-August and early September. It confirmed that double top today by trading below its August low. Spot gold fell to $1628.60 an ounce at its worst point, breaking its support in the lower 1700s by quite a bit.

The precious metals charts are showing technical damage, with silver in much worse shape than gold. Gold broke its 50-day simple moving average yesterday for the first time since June. Today, silver pierced its 325-day simple moving average -- an important support level for any commodity. The DMI technical indicator gave a sell signal for SLV on the daily charts today and was about to do so for the major gold ETF, GLD. In the short term, both are very oversold however.

The huge price drops in silver and gold can only be explained by substantial hedge fund selling that smacks of credit crisis panic. Both of these markets have risen on highly leveraged buying. Once a few overextended funds are forced to sell because of the financial turmoil in Europe, things can go downhill pretty fast. Stops get taken out and this causes more selling, which in turn takes out more stops and leads to more selling. After this, a rally will follow and there should be a test of the low. If it holds, then a sustainable rally can take place. We are not nearly at the point yet. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wall Street Journal’s Flawed Reasoning For Possible Crash

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.



The Wall Street Journal published an article entitled, “Is a Crash Coming? 10 Reason to Be Cautious” on Friday, August 13th. While a crash is certainly possible, the reasons given by the Journal have little to do with why one could occur.

The Journal did make it clear that it was not predicting a crash. The article’s author specifically stated, “I don’t make predictions. That’s a sucker’s game.” Indeed it is a sucker’s game for almost all mainstream financial journalists, just as professional basketball is for midgets – it’s just not an area of natural talent. That of course doesn’t mean that no one can do it, but the author nevertheless made this illogical leap and this nicely set the tone for the rest of his article.

Most of the reasons given in the article for a possible crash were actually arguments for a double-dip recession. These include (my comment follow in italics):

The Fed is getting nervous (more like catatonic).

Deflation is already here (if so, it will be the first time in history money printing created deflation).

People still owe way too much money.

The job picture is much worse than they’re telling you (one of the ‘they’ referred to is the Wall Street Journal itself by the way).

Housing remains a disaster.

We’re looking at gridlock in Washington (so don’t expect any more big spending programs that accomplish little and raise your taxes)

All sorts of other [economic] indicators are flashing amber (actually bright red).

This is an implied assumption in the article that market crashes are related to recessions, also an illogical leap not supported by the facts. The worse U.S. market crash of all-time took place in October 1987, five years after a recession had ended and almost three years before another one began. There were also mini-crashes in 1989 and 1997. The economy was not in recession during these crashes either, nor was it during the recent flash crash.

Economic downturns are more properly associated with bear markets – a long, slow decline in stock prices as opposed to the sudden, sharp drops that take place during crashes. They require very different trading approaches. Even bear markets can take place outside a recession however. The 1998 bear market due to the Russian debt default and the implosion of Long-Term Capital is a good example. Both crashes and bear markets can be caused by global liquidity events and as we saw recently during the Credit Crisis, global liquidity events can also lead to recessions. This did not happen in the U.S. in the 1980s and 1990s however.

Perhaps the Wall Street Journal should have entitled its article, “10 Reasons Why We Are Headed Into a Recession”. They would have to find three additional reasons of course and they would also have to be a bit shameless as well since I already wrote that article on July 8th and it was published on a number of blog sites that day. Well, at least the Wall Street Journal is making some efforts to try to keep up with the blogosphere, even though those efforts are confused and coming weeks later. Now, what can we predict from that?


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

An April 15th Look at Taxes and the Stock Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Tax policy can impact not just how much money you pay in taxes, but how much money you are likely to make in the first place if you are an investor. U.S. capital gains taxes have risen and fallen over the last one hundred years and the stock market usually follows the direction of rates. A significant rate increase will be taking place on January 1, 2011.

The reason capital gains are taxed at different rates than ordinary income is that investing involves risk and capital will not flow unless risk is adequately rewarded. Lower capital gains tax rates encourage more business formation and expansion and bring more capital into the stock market. This is the source of real economic growth. Taking on risk to obtain gain of course means the possibility of loss as well. Uncle Sam is more than willing to demand his share of your profits if you make money, but is no longer your full partner when you experience losses. If you make a million dollars investing, you pay taxes on that million dollars. If you don't have trader status with the IRS and lose a million dollars, you get a $3000 deduction per year and will certainly be dead long before you use it up.

Originally, capital gains were taxed at the rate of ordinary income between 1913 and 1922. Top marginal rates were only 7% at first, but rose to as high as 77% in 1918 to pay for World War I.  An alternative capital gains rate of 12.5% for assets held at least two years was introduced in 1922. The top marginal tax rate on earned income was lowered to 25% in 1925. It was an era of low inflation and even deflation starting in the late 1920s. The stock market and economy did quite well; at least for seven years after the lower capital gains rate was introduced.

In 1932, when Herbert Hoover was still president, the top marginal tax rate on earned income was raised to 63%. In 1934, capital gains tax rates were changed and based on how long an investment was kept. For assets held 1,2, 5 and 10 years, the exclusions were 20, 40, 60, and 70 percent respectively. In 1942, top marginal tax rates were increased to 88%, but maximum capital gains rates were capped at 25% for assets held for six months or longer. Top marginal rates went as high as 94% in 1944 and 1945. They remained at 91% or 92% until 1963. The huge differential between marginal rates on earned income and capital gains rates along with low inflation created an economic and stock market boom that lasted from 1942 until the late 1960s.

The top marginal rate was lowered to 77% in 1964 and then 70% in 1965. Capital gain rates were raised in 1969. Inflation began picking up at around the same time and the combination was a negative for the economy and stock market for over a decade. The government made the problem worse by raising capital gains rates significantly in 1976 and added insult to injury by taxing gains that only existed because of inflation. Maximum capital gains rates peaked at just under 40% in 1977 and 1978.

In 1978, congress voted to reduce maximum capital gains to 28%. In 1981, capital gains were lowered to 20% and the top marginal tax rate to 50% starting in the 1982 tax year. The high rates of inflation from the 1970s were beginning to decline significantly. An almost 20-year boom period followed. There were bumps along the way however. The 1986 Tax Reform Act increased capital gains rates to 28% and lowered the top marginal rate on earned income to 38.5% starting in 1987. The marginal rate was lowered further to 28% in 1988. Ironically, equalization of earned income tax rates and capital gains, a long sought goal of certain liberal economists, took place during the Reagan administration.  The U.S. stock market zoomed for the first eight months. Unfortunately, it then fell almost 40% in a few days in October.

Marginal rates started rising in 1991 and reached 39.6% by 1993. The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 reduced maximum capital gains rates to 20%, once again creating a significant differential between earned income rates and capital gains. Inflation was falling and low during this time and this kept the real capital gains rate close to the official one. The stock market and economy did extremely well for the next three years until the tech bubble burst. To pick up the flagging economy and stock market, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 reduced maximum capitals gains rates to 15% and made this the rate for qualified dividends as well. Inflation was very low during this period. The market and economy did well for the next four years.

Now the maximum capitals gain rate is scheduled to increase from 15% to 20% after the end of the year. Additional taxes will be imposed later on because of the recently passed health care legislation. It looks like we are entering a period of rising inflation and this will make the actual capital gains rate continually go up. I will leave it to the reader to decide what impact this will have on the U.S. economy and the stock market going forward.

Disclosure: Long oil.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

If You Ignore the Facts, Things Are Good

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

We are going to see a lot of new economic data in the next few days, including the monthly jobs report tomorrow. How the market reacts in the first four trading days of the quarter can give us a lot of insight on where stock and commodity prices will be heading in the next few months. The Consumer Spending report was already out this morning and spending for August was up 1.3%, the biggest gain since October 2001. The rosy numbers were due to the Cash for Clunkers program which ended August 31st... so don't expect September's numbers to look as good. The ISM Manufacturing report for September will be out later this morning and might provide more insight into the post Cash for Clunkers era, although the October report next month will be more revealing.

Weekly jobs claims surged upward to 551,000 this morning. The big rise was a surprise to economists and other people who's expectations are based on fantasy. Any number at or above 400,000 indicates the economy is in recession, 551,000 indicates a somewhat severe recession. A healthy economy has weekly claims at the 300,000 level. The idea that the economy can be recovering while unemployment gets worse is absurd and merely reflects how manipulated U.S. GDP figures are. The government can also 'statistically adjust' the jobs report as well. Watch to see how many people left the labor market in tomorrow's report. This is the fudge factor that the government uses to keep the reported unemployment rate from getting too high.

While all the money pumping the Fed has done in the last year has had only temporary and limited impact on the economy so far, it has certainly revved up the stock market. Last quarter was the best quarter for U.S. stocks since the fourth quarter of 2008 - the beginning of the tech bubble blow off that lasted until the beginning of 2000 and was followed by a Depression level drop in stock prices. The last six months have been the best two quarters for U.S. stocks since March 1987. Five months later U.S. stocks dropped 40% in only a few days. That was also at beginning of a bubble blow off. Only a handful of stocks survived the 1987 crash unscathed - most of them were gold miners. So far history seems to be repeating itself vis-a-vis money pumping and stock price behavior.

The IMF (International Monetary Fund) released revisions to its GDP predictions this morning. It now expects global GDP to decline only 1.1% this year, instead of 1.4% and for GDP to increase by 3.1% next year, instead of by 2.5%. While the report had the usual cheer leading bullish tone, a remark made at the press conference inadvertently revealed the truth. The IMF spokesman stated that the report "should not fool governments into thinking the crisis is over". Apparently they wanted to make it clear that their report was only intended to fool the public. The IMF also stated that the pattern of global demand needs to be rebalanced and this could not happen at current exchange rates and that countries with huge export surpluses needed to revalue their currencies upward. Doesn't that imply that countries with huge export deficits like the U.S. will see their currencies revalued lower? So much for that good news.

NEXT: Unemployment Rises as Car Sales Collapse

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Government Action on Both Sides of the Pacific

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Japanese are at it again. The Bank of Japan is now instituting yet another program to buy shares of bank stocks. The history of their interference in the Japanese stock market goes way back and has proven to be a failed approach over and over again. Apparently just because something doesn't work is not a good enough reason for the Japanese (or almost any other government for that matter) to abandon it. While the U.S. is close to emulating Japan's disastrous market interference policies, there is a common-sense bill in Congress that would limit Credit Default Swaps. These instruments are more responsible for the financial market collapse worldwide than anything else. The discredited U.S. financial industry of course opposes the bill. Just because it is obvious they have no idea what they are doing, doesn't mean the U.S. government won't follow their suggestions.

When the Japanese government decided it was better than the Free Market in determining stock prices is not clear. It is known that during the 1987 crash, which was less serious in Japan than in other countries, that the Ministry of Finance called all the major brokerage houses to a meeting and told them to buy stocks (with at least a tacit agreement that the government would make good on the losses). After the Nikkei started tanking from its high of 40,000 set the first day of 1990, various schemes were used by the government to funnel money into stock purchases. While these moved the market up for awhile, each one eventually failed, but the market looked like it might have finally hit bottom after a 13 year sell off in spring of 2003 (the Nikkei was in the low 7000s). But this was not the case.

As per usual the Japanese government helped establish the 2003 stock market low by buying banking stocks. This last stock purchase program took place between November 2002 and September 2004. The Bank of Japan began disposing of these holdings in October 2007 (when international stock markets were at their peak). They had to suspend their selling by September 2008 when they still had 1.3 trillion Yen of stock on the books (at least that's the 'official' number). The Nikkei then hit a new 18 year low after that. The Bank of Japan's just released scheme is to buy one trillion Yen of bank shares, but there a plan in the works to add a 20 trillion Yen to that amount. Unfortunately, at some point these Bank of Japan purchased shares will have to be sold, otherwise the Japanese government would eventually wind up owning most, if not all, of the shares of their major banks. It is quite possible any new selling will cause a new market low to be established. If the Japanese government's real objective is to create the longest stock market sell off in history, they might be successful. If it is to fix their financial system, they should realize that they don't know more than the Free Market.

As for the proposed ban on Credit Default Swaps (CDS) in the U.S. This bill would limit the purchase of CDSs to parties that have an underlying economic interest and reduce the size of the market (and associated risk in it) substantially. CDSs, because they allowed huge leverage in the financial system were key components of the implosion that we are currently witnessing. One industry witness testified that this bill could 'collapse' the $31 trillion CDS market. I seem to remember the less than a year ago the CDS market was $62 trillion is size. Looks to me like the CDS market already collapsed by itself.

NEXT: New York Investing Meetup Versus the SEC

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.