Why Quantitative Easing Won't Happen Now

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Quantitative easing is off the table for the Fed at the moment because of Friday's GDP report. According to the Commerce Department U.S. second quarter GDP growth was 1.5%, which is mediocre, but not bad enough to justify another round of money printing stimulus.

The stock market has been juiced up on a number of occasions since June on rumors of impending QE3.  There is always connected to phrase like "the Fed will do more to help the economy." The mainstream press never raises the question of why does the Fed need to do more to help the economy. If its program worked, the economy should have recovered. If they don't, doing more of the same thing isn't likely to accomplish much. A need for a third round of QE certainly implies that the first two weren't effective — at least in creating economic growth.  Could it be that printing money out of thin air doesn't really create lasting wealth?

All the U.S. fans of quantitative easing should look across the pond at what is taking place in the UK. Its second round of QE was started last October. Yet, Britain has fallen into and remains in recession. It doesn't look like it will exit the recession by the end of the year either. So much for QE being a panacea for saving an economy.

The best case for the ineffectiveness of QE though comes from Japan. Japan has maintained a zero interest rate policy since 1999 (the U.S. had done so since 2008). After ten years of economic decline and malaise Japan began implementing quantitative easing in the early 2000s. The ten years that followed were also a period of economic decline and malaise. The Japanese stock market peaked in 1989 and over twenty years later it is still down more than 75% from its high (investors who fought the Bank of Japan are glad that they did). The various stimulus programs raised stock prices temporarily, but they eventually fell to lower lows.

The stimulus bag of tools that central banks use is meant to be effective when there is a cyclical downturn in the economy. However, they will not work if the problem is structural — and that is exactly what Japan has been dealing with since 1990 and Europe and America are dealing with today (and probably since 2000). We are at the end of the Keynesian era, where credit can no longer be extended to greater levels without creating a subsequent collapse and the economy can't grow without continual stimulus from the central banks and massive government deficits. This is sharply evident in the case of Greece and Spain at the moment, but it is just as true in the U.S., UK and Japan.

The Fed can't just cavalierly decide to engage in more QE as is. It will need to do so if there is a major financial incident in the EU and it can't waste its bullets. It is inevitable that there will be such a crisis, and the Fed knows it. Mario Draghi's assertion on Thursday that the ECB will do everything possible to save the euro was nothing but meaningless bravado. The crisis in Europe has been going on for over two years now and despite numerous bailouts and half a dozen support schemes it keeps getting worse. During the entire time, the powers that be in the EU have said that they will do everything to save the euro. Sometimes "everything" isn't enough. 

The Fed also has the problem of looking political if it acts before the election. While it is true that the Fed has acted before elections in the past, it actions weren't being closely scrutinized back then. Nor were its policies politically controversial. The House of Representatives just passed the Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2012 by 327-98. This legislation would produce a full audit of the Fed. While it might not pass the Senate this time around, eventually it will.

While the Fed will almost certainly be doing quantitative easing again, but it won't happen until either  the problems in Europe become a full-fledge global credit crisis or the U.S. economy is in an obvious recession. In either case, it will not be something to cheer about. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Central Banks Pump Money to Prop Up Europe

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Exactly three years after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and almost brought down the global financial system, central banks in North America, Europe and Asia engaged in a coordinated money pumping operation to prevent the EU banking system from stalling. The move created a sharp stock market rally, especially in financial shares, just as was the case when similar actions took place during the 2008 Credit Crisis.

Involved in Thursday's action were the U.S. Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of England, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Japan.  The purpose was to improve dollar liquidity among  European banks struggling because of the Greek debt crisis. The credit markets have frozen up, just as they did after the Lehman bankruptcy, and U.S. banks have been unwilling to lend dollars to European banks. The ECB will now be able to access dollars by swapping assets with the Federal Reserve. It wasn't stated in the announcement what assets were involved, but obviously they are substandard ones that wouldn't be accepted  in free market trading. This operation also increases exposure of the U.S. financial system to the new credit crisis in Europe.

Such coordinated money-pumping operations are a sign of desperation on the part of the authorities. They were commonplace after Lehman's bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. They created significant volatility in the stock market back then as they did yesterday. Both the German DAX and the French CAC-40 closed up more than 3%. Troubled banks had huge rallies, with Lloyd's Banking Group up over 7%. In 2008, even greater volatility took place, but the rallies proved time and again to be only temporary. The market ultimately nosedived.

The Friday before the Lehman bankruptcy, the S&P 500 closed at 1251.70. Lehman declared bankruptcy on Monday. At the end of the week, the S&P 500 closed at 1255.00. The day before however, the S&P rallied off of its intraday low of 1133.50 to a close of 1206.51 (that's a 6.4% intraday rally -- an enormous move for an index like the S&P). So, the first week after Lehman's bankruptcy it looked like the market wouldn't be impacted that much. It turned out that the actions of central banks provided investors with a false sense of security however.

By the end of September 2008, the S&P 500 closed at 1166.36. Then at the end of October it was down to 968.75. At the end of November, it had dropped to 896.24. It actually closed higher the last day of December at 903.25, before falling to 825.88 at the end of January. By the close of February, the S&P was trading at 735.08. It finally bottomed at 666.79 on March 6, 2009. All along the way, there were big moves up that coincided with the latest money injections of the central banks.

While mainstream media reports tend to portray the central bank actions and the big rallies they cause as good news for the market, they are actually an indication that more trouble is on the way. All investors have to do is remember what happened just three years ago. Yesterday's central bank action indicates that more volatility and lower stock prices are in our future. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

ZIRP Failed in Japan, So They're Doing It Again

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


In what is being billed as a surprise move, the Bank of Japan lowered interest rates back to zero and is planning on more quantitative easing. Along with an unending number of stimulus programs in the last twenty years, Japan has done it all before. If these economic policies actually worked, it wouldn't have to be doing them again. U.S. policy makers are following Japan's lead.

On October 5th, the BOJ announced that it cut interest rates to 0.0% to 0.1%. Rates had been 0.1% since December 2008. Japan had previously maintained a zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) between 2001 and 2006. The U.S. Fed funds rate has been at 0.0% to 0.25% since December 2008. The Bank of Japan also announced a $60 billion quantitative easing program that will purchase government bonds, commercial paper and corporate bonds. Last month, the Japanese government announced a 915 billion yen stimulus package. The Japanese economy has been in the dumps for 20 years and stimulus programs, super low interest rates, and quantitative easing hasn't fixed it. Yet, despite encountering failure over and over and over and over again, the government still repeats these same actions with the belief that somehow they will work this time.

The Japanese government was the most important player in creating the country's massive stock market and real estate bubbles in the 1980s. The last twenty years has been the hangover from those bubbles. Incompetent government policy both led to the creating of the problem and then prevented it from being fixed. It took over 18 years for the stock market to hit a low (assuming it doesn't go lower in the future). Government policy delayed the inevitable, but didn't prevent it. Japan now has the highest government debt to GDP ratio (over 200%) among developed countries. Its debt is so high from its repeated stimulus programs that it makes teetering-on-default Greece look fiscally conservative. The inevitable outcome of Japan's actions will be collapse and not recovery.

In dealing with the Credit Crisis and its aftermath, the U.S. has followed Japan's lead. Just yesterday, Fed Chair Ben Bernanke said the U.S. central bank should engage in more quantitative purchases of treasury bonds because it would "ease financial conditions". Moreover, Bernanke claims the first round of quantitative easing (also known as money printing) was a major success. The figures certainly don't show that this is the case. U.S. unemployment was around 7% when quantitative easing began the first time and is now around 10%. The Fed doesn't actually claim that economic conditions became better, since the obvious facts make that impossible, but instead claims things would have been much worse without their policy actions. How do we know things wouldn't have been better?  How do we know that things didn't become better in the short-term, but will become much worse in the long-term? We do know what has happened in Japan because of the same policy actions that the Fed is following. But like the Japanese, the U.S. Fed apparently also believes in miracles.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

G-20 Meeting's Deficit Goals Are Meaningless

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The G-20 met this weekend and set a goal that member countries should cut their deficits in half by 2013. The agreement also calls for G-20 countries to start reducing their deficit to GDP ratio by 2016. Even with such easy to reach targets, success is by no means guaranteed.

For some reason the G-20 recently woke up and realized countries can't continue to forever spend a lot more than their income from tax receipts. Some of them have been doing just this for many decades at this point. The statement released from the meeting said, "Sound fiscal finances are essential to sustain recovery, provide flexibility to respond to new shocks, ensure the capacity to meet the challenges of aging populations, and avoid leaving future generations with a legacy of deficits and debt."  So at least ten years after the horse has left the corral, the G-20 now wants to close the gait.... but not all the way.

The original proposal for cutting deficits in half was changed from would to should because Japan, the U.S. and India objected. No one actually seems to think that Japan will be able to accomplish this goal. Japan is the most indebted major country on earth with its debt to GDP ratio reaching over 200% this year. Interestingly, the long-term budget projections of the Obama administration are for a deficit of $778 billion for 2013, which would be less than half of the $1.6 trillion projected budget deficit for 2010. The 2013 figure is still almost double the biggest deficit prior to the Credit Crisis however. It also assumes robust GDP growth and minimal inflation during the next few years. Another recession or rising inflation could easily move the U.S. deficit numbers back to well above a trillion dollars. 

European markets were up on the news today and the U.S. market is rallying slightly as well in morning trade. It should be clear to the markets that world leaders are not really serious about reducing government spending. Although, the markets might be worried that even small spending reductions could turn the global economy back down and risk another recession - assuming the first recession actually ended that is.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Past Recessions Provide Insight Into When the Fed Will Raise Rates

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Federal Reserve left the fed funds rate in the zero to 0.25% range at its March meeting. This is the 15th month that the Fed has maintained rates at an all-time low. At the conclusion of the meeting the Fed stated that it will keep rates near zero "for an extended period of time", so no rate increase should be expected for at least several more months. Examining how the Fed reacted to past recessions can provide investors with some insight into when the Fed will actually change to a more restrictive interest rate policy this time around.

According to the official record, the previous U.S. recession took place between March 2001 and November 2001. This recession was unique in that it is the only one in U.S. history where consumer spending didn't drop and it was also one of the mildest recessions on record. Fed funds bottomed at 1.00% in June 2003 - 19 months after the recession was supposedly over. The backdrop was very low inflation. New reports of a jobless recovery were common even in the fall of 2003 and there was great concern at the time because the unemployment rate was at the 6% level (as opposed to 10% today). Fed funds remained at a low point for 11 months. So the Fed started raising its funds rate 30 months after the recession officially ended. If we optimistically assume that the current recession ended in July 2009 because GDP turned positive in the third quarter of the year, this would imply Fed funds would start rising around January 2012.

The recession before the one in the early 2000s took place between July 1990 and March 1991. Fed funds bottomed at 3.00% in September 1992 - 18 months after the recession officially ended. Jobless recovery was also a big news item in 1993. Commentators noted that payroll employment in the 7 previous U.S. recessions had increased on average around seven percent in the two-years following the business trough, but had barely budged in that time period after the 1990-1991 recession. The unemployment rate was around the 7% level. The backdrop was declining inflation. The fed started raising rates in February 1994, so the low rate was maintained for 16 months and this was 35 months after the recession was declared to be over. This would imply that the Fed will start raising rates around June 2012.

The prior recessionary period was the double dip recession that took place between January 1980 to July 1980 and July 1981 to November 1982. This recession was actually created by Federal Reserve policy and sent the U.S. industrial base into a decline from which it never recovered. Inflation was high and at its peak, so interest rates were at the start of a long-term decline. Fed chair Volcker kept raising Fed funds rates until they reached 20%. They last time that they were that high was October 1981. They were then lowered until they had fallen to 8.5% in December 1982. The funds rate was then raised until a new lowering cycle began in September 1984. The funds rate bottomed at 5.875% in August 1986. High fed funds rates did not cause our current recession, so this period of economic history is not necessarily relevant to today's situation. The recession did take place at the beginning of a multi-decade shift in interest rates and this is also occurring now, although we are at the bottom of the cycle and not at the top like we were in the early 1980s. Japan's experience since 1990 indicates that rates can remain at or near their low point for well over a decade.

Before our current recession, the worst post World War II recession occurred between November 1973 and March 1975. Inflation was high and rising during this time period, so interest rates were generally trending upward. Unemployment peaked at 9.0% in May 1975. The concept of jobless recovery was an unknown phenomenon. The fed funds rate reached a low of 4.75% in January and November 1976. The Fed started a consistently more restrictive interest rate policy 21 months after the recession ended. That would imply that April 2011 could be the first Fed funds rate increase this time around.

Historical examination indicates that when the Fed starts raising rates depends on when a recession occurs in the context of a longer-term inflationary/deflationary cycle. When the inflation rate has already been falling for a decade or more or is around its low point, it takes longer for a rate rise than it does in a rising inflationary environment. Two to three years after a U.S. recession has been declared officially ended seems to be the norm before a tighter interest rate environment begins regardless of the inflationary backdrop. If the Fed raises rates on the short side of this number, this will indicate we are heading into rapidly increasing inflation. If it takes more than three years, it will indicate the possibility of grinding deflation as has occurred in Japan since the 1990s. The first alternative is the proverbial devil and the second is the deep blue sea.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: The Dollar, Euro, Gold, Oil and Treasuries

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economists and Governments Pave the Way for Global Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


In a just given speech at the London School of Economics, famed economist Joseph Stiglitz stated that the U.S. and UK should keep on spending and printing money to prop up their economies. Stiglitz apparently did not mention that recent hyperinflation basket case Zimbabwe followed this same approach. Meanwhile, plans for either an EU or German bailout of Greece continue to swirl about, taking the EU down the road of Moral Hazard and truly huge future bailouts for its member states. Government spending, bailouts, and money printing all go hand in hand.

The Stiglitz speech will be seen as a historically significant event. Stiglitz is not some minor, unknown economist, but is an insider's insider. Stiglitz is a winner of a Nobel Prize in Economics, former Chief Economist at the World Bank, former Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, and has held economic professorships at a number of top universities. In his speech, he essentially stated that it is impossible for the US and UK to default on their debt because they have unlimited ability to print money. While this is certainly true, it is also simplistic, self-destructive, and immoral.

Money printing erodes the value of a currency and governments that engage in it are acting dishonestly since it is essentially legalized counterfeiting. Yes, they will give their lenders back the same nominal amount of money as was originally given to them, but lenders won't be able to buy as much with it as they could have previously. Lenders usually catch on to this scam pretty quickly and demand increasingly higher interest rates to compensate for the loss in value of the government bonds they are buying. Needing to pay more interest, the government then prints more money. An inflationary spiral results and the government can't stop the printing because doing so risks an economic collapse.

Stiglitz's approach is hardly original. This is the strategy that every country in history has followed that has experienced hyperinflation. Zimbabwe is only the most recent example; there are dozens of others in the last hundred years, with Greece being one of them. In all cases, the only thing that stopped the inflation was when the money printing stopped. This was most blatantly demonstrated in Zaire in 1997 when the government couldn't pay the outside printer of its currency. It received no new paper money and its hyperinflation ended abruptly. The Weimar Republic in 1920s Germany managed to stop its money printing by creating a new currency (a common solution) and backing it with hard assets. Top German economists during the Weimar Republic backed the government's money printing plans, just as Stiglitz is doing today for the U.S and the UK. 

While the U.S. and UK are well along on their money printing agendas, the EU has lagged behind. The impending bailout of Greece will help them catch up. Greece, in and of itself, is not that big. It is only 2% of the euro zone economy. The implications of a bailout for the future are enormous however. There are a number of other countries in the euro zone that will need their own bailouts. While Ireland, Portugal and Spain are on the list, the most serious problem by far is Italy. Italy is perhaps one year behind Greece in the deterioration of its financial condition. Its economy is approximately the same size as the UK's. How is it possible to bail out an economy that large?  How much money would have to be printed to accomplish this? It would take quite a lot obviously and the euro would be damaged considerably.

We are living in times when almost every government is engaging in policies that will devalue their paper currencies. Hard assets unquestionably become more valuable under such circumstances. How much the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the euro and the yen devalue in relationship to each other remains to be seen. The Japanese have the worst debt to GDP ratio of any major economy in the world and are approaching levels last seen in Zimbabwe. The UK and the US have been the biggest money printers so far, but the euro zone might catch up and surpass them. The best approach for investors would be to avoid keeping any significant amount of liquid assets in any of these currencies.

Disclosure: No positions.

NEXT: World Economic Leaders Need IQ Bailout

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold in Technical Correction as Dollar Rallies

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold had a sharp drop on Friday, December 4th. It was down more than 5% at one point, but closed at $1161.40, off its low. Gold was overbought on both the daily, weekly, and by one measure even on the monthly charts. It needed some pressure taking off after rallying almost every day and hitting one all-time high after another in November. While the bears are coming out of the woodwork and claiming the gold rally is over (as many have claimed was imminent for several months now), there is merely a needed technical correction taking place. The gold charts are so bullish that it would take a lot more selling before the technical picture became damaged. While gold is selling down, the U.S. dollar is not surprisingly rallying since they tend to move in opposite directions. As is the case with gold, it will require a lot more than a few days to change the technical picture of the dollar.

Almost the entire drop in gold prices on the 4th took place during New York trading. What supposedly set off the drop was the U.S jobs report for November, which had much better numbers than expected. While even a cursory analysis of the report indicates that the picture is not so rosy - large numbers of part-time positions suddenly appeared out of nowhere and retailers cut employment during the height of the holiday selling season - the mainstream U.S. media trumpeted the 'good' news, while ignoring the inconvenient facts. Talk of possible sooner than expected Fed rate hikes was cited as the cause of the selling in the precious metals and the rally in the dollar. A Fed rate hike would damage U.S. stocks a lot more than gold, but stocks rallied strongly on the jobs news. So much for that theory. The price of gold is related closely to inflation and future U.S. inflation is already baked in the cake because of all the money printing the Federal Reserve has been doing. It will take years before all the inflation damage from the current bout of easy and fake money fully manifests itself.

It will also takes years before the Credit Crisis money printing operations are finished damaging the U.S. dollar. That doesn't mean it will go down every day in the interim, just like gold won't go up every day. The trade-weighted dollar has been selling off since March. It has been trading continually below its falling 50-day moving average since April. It managed to peak above the 50-day once in early November. December 4th was the first day it managed to close above it in more than seven months. To return to rally mode, the dollar would have to stay above the 50-day, rally to its 200-day moving average (well above its current level), stay above the 200-day then the 50-day would have to cross the 200-day. This would require two or three months minimally and around six months would be more likely -assuming that it is going to happen. That assumption as of now is based on one day's trading activity indicating a change in an eight month trend.

Dollar rallies in the last several months tend to be concentrated in only one or two currencies in the trade-weighted basket, indicating a helping hand from the respective central banks. The last rally in early November was based on a strong move down in the euro and Canadian dollar. The weak British pound actually went up during that time. This dollar rally has been more concentrated in the Japanese yen and Bank of Japan intervention should be assumed. The falling dollar is a risk to major exporting countries and they want to drive their currencies down versus the dollar. U.S. authorities seem quite complacent about the falling dollar however because they believe it will increase U.S. exports. Without macro policy changes such as significantly higher interest rates (that would be well above the current zero level in the U.S and a quarter, half or even a whole point rise wouldn't do it), central bank intervention to alter currency relationships gets undone pretty quickly.

The technical picture in gold is not fully resolved yet. A little more selling will be necessary. This can be mixed in with a lot of volatility. The intermediate picture is still up for gold and the other precious metals. So far, this looks like a mid-rally correction. The correction is merely taking place a lot faster than is usual. As of now, the most probable peak for the current gold rally is still in the March to May 2010 time frame.

Disclosure: Long gold and silver.

NEXT: More Government Stimulus and More Debt

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Gases Up; Bear Bites Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Week after week after week this spring the media reported a glut in U.S. oil supply. This blog and the New York Investing meetup had to debunk this view of the state of the energy markets more than once. The supply report today once again confirms that the only glut that existed was in the imagination of reporters working for the big media outlets. Storage was way below expectations across the board for oil, gasoline and distillates. This has yet to happen in natural gas, but the market is in super contango just as the oil was in January and early February of this year. Indirectly bullish for oil and natural gas going forward was Russia's announcement today that it is reducing its U.S. Treasury holdings.

Expectations for the EIA's storage report was for a drop of 500,000 barrels of oil and an increase of 750,000 barrels of gasoline and 1.5 million barrels of distillates. Instead, oil in storage fell by 4.4 million barrels, gasoline fell by 1.6 million barrels and distillates fell by 300,000 barrels. This is the third oil report in the last four weeks that indicated a large drop in storage. The oil markets barely moved on this incredibly bullish report, although light sweet crude has been trading today around 71, above the key resistance point of 70.80.

Unlike oil, which has been rallying since mid-February, natural gas has been in the doldrums and is the worst performing commodity this year. This may be changing soon. Natural gas futures are in super contango - the distance future contract are priced well above the near term contract. The July contract is currently priced around $3.80, but the December contract is priced above $6 or more than 60% higher. Oil had the same behavior just before it bottomed and then went up for four straight months. Pay attention to this.

Although it is not getting much play so far, the most important news to come out this morning is that Russia plans to reduce its U.S. Treasury holdings. Along with China, Japan, and the Gulf Oil States, Russia is one the 4 biggest foreign holders of U.S debt. Russia says that it is not selling its U.S. bonds, but will just not replace them when they mature (you should read this as: Russia refuses to buy any more worthless U.S. debt and help us fund our deficit, so we are going to have to print even more money than we were planning). While this may sound like a minor change, it could devastating for the U.S. Dollar. Once one of the major debt holders starts bailing, there could be a stampede for the exits. Did the dollar nosedive on the news? Of course not, it actually went up afterwards. We will have to see just how long central bank intervention can forestall the market's gravitational effects.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

NEXT: Disaster Stalks the Dollar

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Government Action on Both Sides of the Pacific

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Japanese are at it again. The Bank of Japan is now instituting yet another program to buy shares of bank stocks. The history of their interference in the Japanese stock market goes way back and has proven to be a failed approach over and over again. Apparently just because something doesn't work is not a good enough reason for the Japanese (or almost any other government for that matter) to abandon it. While the U.S. is close to emulating Japan's disastrous market interference policies, there is a common-sense bill in Congress that would limit Credit Default Swaps. These instruments are more responsible for the financial market collapse worldwide than anything else. The discredited U.S. financial industry of course opposes the bill. Just because it is obvious they have no idea what they are doing, doesn't mean the U.S. government won't follow their suggestions.

When the Japanese government decided it was better than the Free Market in determining stock prices is not clear. It is known that during the 1987 crash, which was less serious in Japan than in other countries, that the Ministry of Finance called all the major brokerage houses to a meeting and told them to buy stocks (with at least a tacit agreement that the government would make good on the losses). After the Nikkei started tanking from its high of 40,000 set the first day of 1990, various schemes were used by the government to funnel money into stock purchases. While these moved the market up for awhile, each one eventually failed, but the market looked like it might have finally hit bottom after a 13 year sell off in spring of 2003 (the Nikkei was in the low 7000s). But this was not the case.

As per usual the Japanese government helped establish the 2003 stock market low by buying banking stocks. This last stock purchase program took place between November 2002 and September 2004. The Bank of Japan began disposing of these holdings in October 2007 (when international stock markets were at their peak). They had to suspend their selling by September 2008 when they still had 1.3 trillion Yen of stock on the books (at least that's the 'official' number). The Nikkei then hit a new 18 year low after that. The Bank of Japan's just released scheme is to buy one trillion Yen of bank shares, but there a plan in the works to add a 20 trillion Yen to that amount. Unfortunately, at some point these Bank of Japan purchased shares will have to be sold, otherwise the Japanese government would eventually wind up owning most, if not all, of the shares of their major banks. It is quite possible any new selling will cause a new market low to be established. If the Japanese government's real objective is to create the longest stock market sell off in history, they might be successful. If it is to fix their financial system, they should realize that they don't know more than the Free Market.

As for the proposed ban on Credit Default Swaps (CDS) in the U.S. This bill would limit the purchase of CDSs to parties that have an underlying economic interest and reduce the size of the market (and associated risk in it) substantially. CDSs, because they allowed huge leverage in the financial system were key components of the implosion that we are currently witnessing. One industry witness testified that this bill could 'collapse' the $31 trillion CDS market. I seem to remember the less than a year ago the CDS market was $62 trillion is size. Looks to me like the CDS market already collapsed by itself.

NEXT: New York Investing Meetup Versus the SEC

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Enters Buy Zone

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

At the extremes of sentiment, there is nothing more bullish than a bearish commodity. When oil got to around $12.50 a barrel in 1998, surveys showed that only 3% of traders had a positive price outlook . Within days it was trading over $17 a barrel. The turnaround was sudden and explosive. The few contrarians who saw the opportunity made a lot of money in a short period of time. It turned out that $12.50 wasn't the low however, that was in the $10 range and it took a few more months to reach it. Similar behaviour is possible this time around.

Nymex oil fell as low as $33.44 in overnight trading. This represented a sharp drop in 24 hours after more than five long months of steep selling. It is common for markets to have six month sell offs. It is also common for the selling to end with a big drop at the end. Keeping that in mind, I started buying OIL today, even though I do not think oil has hit its low just yet. I suspect that this will be somewhere between $22 and $28. The set up for a good short term trade or the beginning of accumulating a position seems to exist though.

As I have said many times, the bottom price of oil will be determined by the cost of production. This is much higher than it was in 1998 because there is less easy to get to oil available. Much of the oil that has come on line in the last few years is oil that is expensive to produce, such as tar sand oil from Canada. This supply will start disappearing with oil selling in the 30s and the loss of supply will become extreme in the 20s. While you can find any number of news articles about how the demand for oil is going down because of the economy, you will see little about the supply also decreasing, which is the bullish side of the equation. Economic arguments that deal with the demand picture without mentioning supply are meaningless and should always be discounted.

Oil is one of the four pillars of inflationary investing (along with gold, silver, and food commodities). Keep in mind that it is priced in U.S. dollars and the Fed basically said this week that it intends on printing any amount of currency necessary to get the U.S. out of its current depression (my word not theirs). Just last night the BOJ in Japan lowered interest rates to 0.1%. England will likely institute ZIRP sometime in 2009. With the world's central banks engaging in hyperinflationary policies, it is only a matter of time before the price of inflation-linked commodities skyrocket. You just need to time your entry and wait for that to happen.

NEXT: Bailouts: It's Not Just Banks, It's not Just the U.S.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.