U.S. Employment — The Spring of Discontent

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the BLS, the U.S. economy created only 69,000 jobs in May 2012. The previous two months were revised down, March from 154,000 to 143,000, and the April from 115,000 to 77,000. Although the U.S. economy is not creating enough jobs for new entrants into the labor force, the BLS claimed the unemployment rate was only 8.2%.

Early in the year, the mainstream media was filled with reports of the recovering job market and a U.S. economy on the upswing. The average reported monthly job gain was 226,000 a month in the first quarter — a healthy amount if it were true. There was more than enough reason to believe it was not true however. The jobs numbers are seasonally adjusted and the winter was unusually warm meaning the usual large layoffs in industries like construction didn't take place. Nevertheless, the BLS adjusted its figures as if they had.

If the better figures in the winter were created by seasonal adjustments and not a better economy, then the spring figures should consequently be weak. This is exactly what has happened. The telltale sign can be found in the May Construction employment number — down by 28,000 last month when it should have been strong.

Almost all the job gains came from only two sources last month, Health Care and Social Services (33,000)  and Transportation and Warehousing (36,000). Health Care is the only category that consistently added jobs during the Great Recession. If the BLS numbers are projected out to the distant future, almost every American in the labor force will eventually be employed in this field.

As usual, comparisons with five years ago indicate that the U.S. economy is still in serious trouble. There were almost 3.7 million less people employed last month than in May 2007. At the same time, the over-16 noninstitutional population has increased by nearly 11.5 million or around 192,000 per month. Yet, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force has grown by a little over 2.2 million or approximately 37,000 a month. There is a major disconnect between those numbers and it indicates that a lot more Americans are unemployed than the BLS headline number indicates.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Rumors of Housing's Rise From the Dead Are Greatly Exaggerated

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Housing starts for November were released today, December 20th, and the stock market rallied strongly on the supposedly "good" news. The statistical error rate in the housing report is so huge, that the numbers are meaningless -- and easily subject to manipulation by a government that is desperate to provide news of a recovering economy.

Housing starts peaked at 2,273,000 in January 2006. According to the Commerce Department, construction of new U.S. residences in November 2011 was 635,000. Almost five years later, housing activity is still less than 28% of what it was at the peak. Despite this almost three-quarters decline in housing activity, this is being spun as evidence of an economic recovery by the mainstream media. Would you consider it progress if your salary was only 28% of what is was five years ago?

As dismal as this statistic is, it is very possible the actual number is much worse. The housing starts report has the highest statistical margin of error of any government report. The error is so huge that is a waste of taxpayer money to produce this report. The error in the overall number can be greater than ten percent. The error on individual components can be as much as 33%. This is important because better housing start numbers in 2011 (November was not the first month when better numbers were reported, this took place earlier in the year as well), have been created by a supposed surge in apartment house construction. Apartment construction rose by 25.3% in November and this is what is making the overall number higher. Considering the huge statistical error rate, it is possible that it didn't rise at all.

Optimists who think it did rise by that much need to ponder the implications of why a lot of apartments are being built and very few single-family houses. The inescapable conclusion is that few Americans can afford to buy their own home anymore. I would hardly describe that as an indication of better economic conditions. Even more telling is that the number of completed housing units dropped by 5.6% in November even though housing starts rose earlier this year. If this is correct, a lot of housing that is begun is not being finished. While that makes no sense, nothing else about the report does either.  

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

More Contradictions in Third Quarter GDP

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Commerce Department reported today that third quarter GDP increased at a 2.5% annual rate. A supposedly much lower inflation rate created significant improvement over numbers from earlier in the year. There was also a surge in consumer and business spending reported, although other recent surveys contradict the claims in the GDP release.

Real personal consumption expenditures (consumer spending) increased by 2.4% compared to only 0.7% in the second quarter. Most of this was caused by a 4.1% increase in durable goods purchases. Nondurables were barely changed. Delayed auto and parts shipments from Japan because of disruption from the massive March earthquake can account for more sales being reported in the third quarter, but not likely to be repeated in the fourth. Despite claims of much higher consumer sales, businesses barely increased inventories in the third quarter — something they would do if they saw their sales climbing. Moreover, consumer confidence surveys indicate consumers were gloomy in the third quarter and readings have now fallen as low as they were around the bottom of the 2008/2009 Credit Crisis. Consumer confidence surveys are not controlled by the government and act as a check of the reliability on government statistics. 

While businesses didn't seem to notice any increase in customer spending, there was nevertheless a frenzy of equipment and software buying going on. This supposedly increased by 17.4% during the quarter. Apparently, I missed the all the news about major software upgrades and equipment innovations that took place this summer. Nonresidential structure spending was almost as buoyant increasing by 13.3%. Where this building boom is taking place isn't exactly clear. Coincidentally, the unemployment rate among U.S. construction workers is also 13.3% (See Household Data Table A-14 of the September Non-Farm Payrolls Report). As bad as this is, it is still a year over year improvement.

GDP figures are also boosted if the inflation rate is lower. It's a lot easier to report better inflation numbers — all it takes is some statistical adjustments — than it is to actually improve the economy. Inflation was supposedly 3.3% in the second quarter, but only 2.0% in the third quarter. Nominal GDP is reduced by the inflation rate to get the final figure. The change in inflation, whether or not it actually took place, added much of the improvement seen from the second to third quarter, not an increase in economic growth.

Mass media coverage about GPD was of course ebullient about what good shape the U.S. economy is in. Of course, we won't know the actual number for several more years. This report is only preliminary and there are two adjustments that will be made to it and then annual revisions every July. In the last several years, adjustments have been mostly down, sometimes by very significant amounts. Even then, that number is going to still be overstated because the U.S. consistently understates its inflation rate. To find an approximate level of the actual GDP, just subtract 3% from the reported number. This will give you a more accurate sense of what is going on in the economy. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Still at Recession Levels in September

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The non-farm payrolls report for September indicated the U.S. economy added 103,000 jobs last month. Mainstream media immediately jumped on the number as proof the U.S. is not in a recession. It indicates no such thing.

While it seems reasonable to assume that employment can't increase at the begging of a recession, this did not happen in December 2007 when the Great Recession began. Total U.S. non-farm payroll employment actually peaked in January 2008 at 137,996,000. It then declined until hitting a low point of 129,246,000 in February 2010, many months after the recession supposedly bottomed in June 2009. Total employment in September 2011 was only 131,334,000, not even remotely close to levels four years earlier. These figures can be viewed at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/PAYEMS.txt.

The internals of the employment situation for September were not encouraging either. In their press release, the BLS admitted right up front that the end of a strike by the Communication Workers union added 45,000 jobs to the 103,000 total. This leaves only 58,000 jobs being created during the month. More than that amount came from only two sources -- health care and construction. The largest increase in jobs was 41,000 and they were created in the "health care and social assistance" category. Like education, many of these jobs are funded by the government either directly or indirectly, yet they are counted as private sector jobs. The government promulgates this fantasy and the mainstream media mindlessly repeats it.

Another 26,000 jobs somehow came from construction. At least the BLS didn't claim they came from the struggling residential real estate market. Almost all of these new jobs came from the heavy and civil construction category. Perhaps the federal government is building another Hoover Dam and forgot to mention it to the public? This is sort of an eyebrow raising number to say the least.

So in September 2011, there were 6,649,000 less employed people in the U.S. than when the Great Recession began in 2007. This is after over two years of supposed recovery. Based on the recent net increases in the labor force, the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 new jobs a month for the employment situation to just hold steady. To reduce the official unemployment rate of 9.1% would require adding a much larger number of jobs every month. This is not happening. As for whether or not the U.S. is in a recession, an unemployment rate of 9.1% has always indicated a recession in the past. Is there any reason to think "things are different" this time around?

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

House of Cards Falling Down

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. housing data for May was out today and no matter how you look at it the report was bleak. The number of houses under construction fell to a record low of 475,000. The 17% drop in single-family homes was the biggest since the 1990-91 recession. Applications for permits were the lowest in a year.

There were hints that the housing market was already in trouble last month when construction permits fell 10%. They dropped an additional 5.9% in May. The federal government housing tax credit expired at the end of April and builders clearly understood that without government subsidies consumers were going to take a hike. And take a hike they did - mortgage purchase applications peaked on April 30th, the last day of the tax credit, and are now at a 13-year low even though mortgage rates have come down.

Housing starts are now down 70% from their peak even though the federal government has made Herculean efforts to support the market. U.S. housing was in a bubble and there is no case in history of a bubble being reinflated immediately after a collapse. Trying to do so is equivalent to pouring money down a drain. There is no better example of this than ongoing federal government subsidies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Bloomberg has just estimated that these will reach $1 trillion (more than the entire TARP program). U.S. taxpayers are footing the bill. Fannie and Freddie are going to be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, probably on July 8th. So much for unlimited financial support from the federal government leading to success.

Housing was the epicenter of the Credit Crisis collapse. The market has not returned to health and it is not likely that it will for many more years. The overall U.S. economy itself is now on the verge of turning down again as well. ECRI leading indicators turned negative last week. The last time they did so was in September 2007. A recession began two months later. So far, the ECRI is downplaying its own data and claiming that its numbers indicate that the U.S. economy will be experiencing 'slow' growth in the next six to nine months.

The 'fast' growth that has been occurring in U.S. GDP has been based on changes in inventory levels and not an actual recovery in the private sector. In Q4 2009, a slower decline (yes decline) in inventories was responsible for approximately two-thirds of the increase in GDP. In Q1 2010, inventory replenishment accounted for more than half of the growth.

While the Credit Crisis had its origins in the U.S., the new unfolding global financial crisis is centered in Europe. There are reports that the IMF and the U.S. Treasury are in talks about a 250 billion euro bailout for Spain. While Spain and the IMF have denied the report, the market indicates some serious problem exists. The risk premium on Spanish bonds over equivalent German bonds has risen to the highest level since the creation of the euro.

Government spending can certainly make the economy or any given sector of it better for a while. Based on the evidence so far, the government has to continually spend or the economy falls right back down to where it was before the spending took place. Even reduced, but still substantial spending is not likely to be enough to keep the economy in the black under such circumstances. Governments have faced similar problems many times in history and have seen that major inflation is the outcome of utilizing this approach. Apparently the world's current regimes are now determined to make the same mistakes again.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Figures Don't Add Up

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Fed chair Ben Bernanke is up for reappointment and is experiencing some difficult times with his congressional critics. Good news has suddenly and conveniently appeared to bolster his case however, including Bank of America planning on repaying the TARP money it received from the U.S. government and then a big improvement on the non-farms payroll number released on December 3rd. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were only 11,000 jobs lost in November 2009 and the losses for the previous couple of months weren't nearly as bad as they had reported (the last time there were actual job gains in the U.S. was in December 2007). Independent private surveys don't corroborate the government's numbers.

The U.S. government figures were not completely rosy by any means. They indicate that there were major job losses in Manufacturing and Construction, a significant drop in Information and in Leisure and Hospitality jobs, and amazingly a drop in Retail jobs during the height of the holiday season. U.S. Manufacturing employment fell by 41,000 in November and has declined by an eye-popping 2.1 million since the recession began in December 2007. Construction jobs fell by 27,000. There was also a loss of 17,000 jobs in the Information industries (half of that in telecommunications). Leisure and Hospitality lost 11,000 jobs. Jobs in retail declined by 15,000. You would not know this from reading the BLS press release however, unless you looked at the data attached to the bottom of it. The copy did not mention that there was a job loss in retail, but instead stated "there was little change in wholesale and retail employment".

So where did the job gains come from? Three categories had increases in employment -Professional and Business Services, Education and Health Services and Government. Professional and Business Services was the big gainer adding 86,000 jobs. However, 52,000 of those jobs were part-time. Education and Health Services added 40,000 jobs with 21,000 of these jobs coming from Health Care and presumably 19,000 from Education (which is not known for hiring people in November). Government added 7,000 jobs. The two consistent job producers since the recession began two years ago have been the Government and Health Care categories, with Education also frequently adding jobs (many health care and education jobs are government related).

The BLS claimed that unemployment fell from 10.2% to 10.0% in November. How can the unemployment rate fall when there are job losses? People have to leave the labor force. Barring a sudden population decrease of working age individuals, workers have to get so discouraged form the bad employment situation that they just give up looking. According to the BLS, 2.3 million people are marginally attached to the labor force and are not counted as unemployed because they did not look for a job in the previous four weeks. Another 9.2 million are working part-time even though they want full-time employment. The alternative unemployment rate which includes discouraged workers and involuntary part-time workers was reported by the BLS as 17.2%.

A check on U.S. government employment figures can be gotten from the ISM (Institute of Supply Management) Services and Manufacturing Indices, both of which survey employment as well as a number of other factors which indicate economic growth or lack thereof. The Services Index was released just yesterday and employment came in at 41.6 (under 50 means contraction). Employment in the services sector has been in decline for the last 19 months and dropped from October to November according to the ISM. All the job gains in the government employment report supposedly came from the service sector. There is a major contradiction here.

The November non-farms payroll figures are another government release indicating the U.S. economy is getting better. This one doesn't add up either. Healthy economies don't have major job losses in manufacturing and construction. Nor are jobs lost in retail during the holiday season (they are during depressions, but certainly not if the economy is improving). The big job gains were part-time, not permanent. The unemployment rate is improving because workers are so discouraged that they are leaving the labor force, not because jobs are being added. This doesn't happen if the economy is getting better either. Furthermore private surveys don't support the governments numbers. Investors should be wary. While markets can be fooled in the short-term, in the long-term they trade on reality.

Disclosure: None.

NEXT: Gold in Technical Correction as Dollar Rallies

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.