Retail Sales and Employment Not as Good as First Reported

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There has much cheerleading in the mainstream press lately about the improving employment situation and strong 2011 holiday retail sales. Just released figures indicate it may have been much ado about nothing.

Retailers depend on the holiday season for their yearly profits. Major efforts were made in November to get people to start buying early. This worked and retail sales were up 0.4% during the month. Strong early numbers don't necessarily mean overall numbers will be greater however. It can simply mean that buying activity was frontloaded and the later numbers will then be weak. This is exactly what happened. Retail sales were up a whopping 0.1% in December (retail sales are not adjusted for inflation, the number would be negative if it had been).

Looking inside the report shows how incredibly weak the consumer is. Excluding autos, which are highly volatile, retail sales were 0.2% lower -- the first drop since May 2010. Core retail sales, which exclude autos, gasoline and building materials were down 0.1%. Even though it was the height of the holiday buying season, spending at electronic and appliance stores was down 3.9% and spending at department stores was down 0.2%. Once again, if the numbers had been adjusted for inflation they would have been even worse.

So how come U.S. consumers aren't spending more now that the employment situation is supposedly getting better?  Well, maybe it's because it isn't. The big news lately has been the declining weekly claims which have fallen below the traditional 400,000 per week that indicates recession. However, for the first week of 2012 they came in at 399,000 -- back at recession levels. This was up from the 372,000 reported the previous week (three states including mega-sized California didn't send in their claims numbers for this report).  Of course, the mainstream press blew the trumpets about the "good", but highly questionable, 372,000 number, just as it did for the 200,000 jobs that were allegedly created in December 2011.

Among these jobs were 42,000 new messenger positions. While it's more likely that 42,000 messengers were hired in December than 42,000 nuclear physicists, that doesn't mean it is believable. Messengers work in a field with declining employment. The December jobs report has been criticized as having "statistical adjustment" problems. Non-statisticians generally refer to this as lying about the numbers. Of course, the appearance of suddenly improving economic news (not to be confused with an economy that is actually improving) at the beginning of a presidential election year should not be surprising.

As the election season heats up, there will be a desire for the government to report that economic conditions are better than they actually are.  This does not mean the news will necessarily be good, it will just be better than it actually is. Expect the bad news to come out after the November election.  Until then, invest with caution. 

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Technical Look at Gold and Silver at the End of 2011

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While gold and silver are in long-term secular bull markets, they have experienced price weakness in the last few months of 2011. The technical picture indicates that they are likely to remain pressured for a while longer before recovering in 2012.

GLD (the major ETF for gold)  fell below its 200-day simple moving average earlier in December and at the time, I pointed out in a previous article that this indicated lower prices in the future and it would next fall to the 325-day. After bouncing back up to the 200-day, gold did indeed fall to 148 on December 29th, which was the 325-day moving average. At the time that gold was breaking its 200-day, the DMI (directional moving indicator) also gave a sell signal on the daily charts. The RSI (relative strength index) fell below 50 and MACD (moving average convergence divergence) below the zero line -- both bearish. The sell signal on the DMI does not seem to be exhausted just yet.

The moving average picture overall still indicates that gold is in a short-term bull market. For this to turn negative, the 50-day would have to fall below the 200-day moving average and even then it shouldn't be considered as serious unless it was confirmed by a cross below the 325-day. The gives gold a lot of room to fall, even if the chart remains bullish. Even though a short rally in the beginning of 2012 is indeed possible, lower prices are likely to follow. A break of the 325-day moving average should be considered significant and would next bring GLD down to the 140 level. The 40-month simple moving average however is the most solid support below the 325-day. 

Silver shows greater weakness than gold on its charts with the selling much more advanced. Unlike gold, silver has hit new yearly lows and when this happens the first time, it is likely that a series of  new lows will then be made, although short rallies frequently take place first.  For SLV, the major silver ETF, the 50-day moving average already fell below the 200-day in October and the bearish pattern was confirmed when the 50-day then fell below the 325-day at the end of November.  On the daily charts, the DMI is on a sell signal and this seems to be only halfway done at this point. The other technical indicators are also bearish. SLV is currently being held up by support around 26. Much stronger support exists around 21 (really a band of support between 18 and 21).

The recent drops in gold and silver should be considered to be buying opportunities, although investors with a longer-term horizon should not be pushing the buy button just yet. The charts do not indicate a definitive bottom has been put in, nor that this is likely to happen in the next few weeks. Secular bull markets tend to last for around 20 years and this indicates the ultimate high for gold and silver will be around 2020. While there is always a higher high in the future during secular bulls that doesn't mean that there aren't major reversals along the way. The stock market secular bull between 1982 and 2000 had the 1987 crash, the 1989 and 1997 flash crashes, the 1990/91 bear market and the 1998 bear market. Smart investors used these declines as buying opportunities and made lots of money when they did. The same will be true for gold and silver for the rest of this decade. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

More Contradictions in Third Quarter GDP

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Commerce Department reported today that third quarter GDP increased at a 2.5% annual rate. A supposedly much lower inflation rate created significant improvement over numbers from earlier in the year. There was also a surge in consumer and business spending reported, although other recent surveys contradict the claims in the GDP release.

Real personal consumption expenditures (consumer spending) increased by 2.4% compared to only 0.7% in the second quarter. Most of this was caused by a 4.1% increase in durable goods purchases. Nondurables were barely changed. Delayed auto and parts shipments from Japan because of disruption from the massive March earthquake can account for more sales being reported in the third quarter, but not likely to be repeated in the fourth. Despite claims of much higher consumer sales, businesses barely increased inventories in the third quarter — something they would do if they saw their sales climbing. Moreover, consumer confidence surveys indicate consumers were gloomy in the third quarter and readings have now fallen as low as they were around the bottom of the 2008/2009 Credit Crisis. Consumer confidence surveys are not controlled by the government and act as a check of the reliability on government statistics. 

While businesses didn't seem to notice any increase in customer spending, there was nevertheless a frenzy of equipment and software buying going on. This supposedly increased by 17.4% during the quarter. Apparently, I missed the all the news about major software upgrades and equipment innovations that took place this summer. Nonresidential structure spending was almost as buoyant increasing by 13.3%. Where this building boom is taking place isn't exactly clear. Coincidentally, the unemployment rate among U.S. construction workers is also 13.3% (See Household Data Table A-14 of the September Non-Farm Payrolls Report). As bad as this is, it is still a year over year improvement.

GDP figures are also boosted if the inflation rate is lower. It's a lot easier to report better inflation numbers — all it takes is some statistical adjustments — than it is to actually improve the economy. Inflation was supposedly 3.3% in the second quarter, but only 2.0% in the third quarter. Nominal GDP is reduced by the inflation rate to get the final figure. The change in inflation, whether or not it actually took place, added much of the improvement seen from the second to third quarter, not an increase in economic growth.

Mass media coverage about GPD was of course ebullient about what good shape the U.S. economy is in. Of course, we won't know the actual number for several more years. This report is only preliminary and there are two adjustments that will be made to it and then annual revisions every July. In the last several years, adjustments have been mostly down, sometimes by very significant amounts. Even then, that number is going to still be overstated because the U.S. consistently understates its inflation rate. To find an approximate level of the actual GDP, just subtract 3% from the reported number. This will give you a more accurate sense of what is going on in the economy. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Recovery Goes Jobless in August

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

More evidence that the U.S. economy is grinding to halt was provided by the August non-farm payroll numbers today. According to the BLS (the Bureau of Labor Statistics), the U.S. economy produced no additional jobs in August, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 9.1%, and average hourly earnings declined. The June and July numbers were revised downward with 58,000 less jobs than originally reported.

Almost every category lost jobs in August except for health care and social assistance, professional and business services, and mining and logging. Health care and social assistance added 30,000 jobs. This category was the one perennial gainer during the Great Recession and its aftermath. Even though many of these jobs are government related, they are classified as private sector by the BLS. Professional and business services added 28,000 jobs. A footnote in the report states that this number includes jobs from other unspecified categories (could those be government jobs that are included to make it look like private sector employment is better than it actually is?).  Mining and logging added another 6,000 jobs.

Year over year comparisons were even more dismal than the monthly numbers suggested. There were only 400,000 more people employed in the U.S. this August compared to August 2010 (see Household Data, Summary Table A on the BLS website for the details). This is the actual net number of new jobs created in the last year. This has averaged 33,000 a month. At the same time, the non-institutionalized civilian population has been growing at almost 150,000 per month. Yet, during this time period, the unemployment rate fell from 9.6% to 9.1%.  This has happened not because a lot of jobs were created, but because approximately 2.3 million people left the labor force.

Despite close to zero percent interest rates and the trillions of dollars of stimulus thrown at it, the U.S. economy seems incapable of producing jobs. The only thing that has prevented the reported unemployment rate from rising into the double digits is the large numbers of people exiting the labor force (they are not counted as unemployed). This doesn't happen when a real economic recovery takes place. People rush into the labor force as jobs become more plentiful. Unemployment rates also don't remain at the 9% level if the economy is doing well as has constantly been reported. Mainstream press claims to the contrary,  a "jobless recovery" just doesn't exist in the real world (nor are there tall midgets or thin obese people). Based on the jobs numbers, investors should assume that the U.S. has been in a chronic state of recession and chronic stimulus is needed to keep things from getting worse.   

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
 

July Consumer Spending - Reports of Its Health Greatly Exaggerated

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The U.S. stock market reacted jubilantly to July's consumer spending numbers. Apparently, it didn't see the bad news the BLS report contained. Some of this was understandable since the AP (Associated Press) article -- carried by hundreds of news outlets -- seems to have reported more favorable numbers than the ones the government released.

The important take-away from the report was that disposable personal income adjusted for inflation (or more accurately adjusted to reflect some of the inflation that actually exists) was down 0.1%. So if there was any increase in consumer spending, it was taking place on money being borrowed by already tapped out consumers. U.S. consumer debt, including mortgages, is already more than the $15 trillion GDP. Federal government debt is approaching that amount.

Both the BLS and AP reported that consumer spending increased by 0.8% in June. This number is unadjusted for the official inflation rate. The rise was concentrated in the durable goods component of the report. The BLS reported this as being up 2.0% and AP had it up 1.9%. Apparently, U.S. consumers ran out and bought more automobiles and automobile parts in July. According to the government, they then spent less on non-durable goods (items that last less than a year). According to AP, they spent more.

The BLS report had non-durable goods spending down 0.3% in July. AP reported it up 0.7%. Both reports had spending on services being up, the government by 0.5% and AP by 0.7%.  The story reported by AP was far more favorable that the one told by the U.S. government, which was in turn much more favorable than would be the case if some realistic inflation rate was used. The discrepancy for the non-durable and services numbers in the two versions is probably a consequence of AP using numbers not adjusted for inflation. These numbers will always make things look as favorable as possible. This is not news; it's public relations that favors Wall Street and makes the government look like it's doing a better job with the economy than is actually the case. Traditionally, this would be referred to as propaganda.

While the spending on durable goods was concentrated in transportation, increases for services took place because Americans were using more electricity to run their air conditioners during the record hot weather in July. This does not indicate the economy is getting better, nor that it is even flat. It indicates that it was hot in July. Yet, the AP couldn't wait to quote economists that claimed the consumer income and spending numbers that it reported indicated a U.S. economy with rosy prospects. Perhaps they should try including comments on the actual numbers next time.

The BLS report can be found at: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/2011/pi0711.htm

One of the hundreds of places the AP report can be found is:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Consumers-spending-rebounds-apf-1701587266.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Today's Stock Market Action Looks A Lot Like August 1998

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Something is seriously bothering the stock market and the news that's out there isn't enough to justify what is going on. Such was the case in August 1998 as well. What caused the sudden bear market to appear out of nowhere in 1998 became fully evident only after the fact. The same could be the case in August 2011.

Perhaps the flash crash in October 1997 was a warning of things to come, just as the flash crash in May 2010 may have been a prelude to today's stock market drop. In the second half of July of 1998, stocks began to nosedive suddenly, just as they did in 2011. Some stabilization took place in the market toward the middle of August in 1998 and then a new deeper plunge began. Today, the Dow Jones industrials were suddenly down over 500 points this morning on what could only be considered minor bad news.

There were actually two problems causing the market debacle in 1998. Everyone knew about one of them - the Russian debt default and devaluation of the rubble, which took place on August 17th (less than half of the eventual market decline took place before this date).  Only Wall Street insiders knew about the second one - problems at Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) - that almost brought down the financial system. 

Trouble in Russia was evident as early as October 1997 and it resulted from the fallout from the Asian financial crisis, which in turn started as a currency crisis in Thailand in July of that year. Today, Europe is undergoing a crisis with the euro that began in Greece in 2010. By August 1998, the Russian central bank had spent a great deal of its dollar reserves defending the ruble and decided to give up. The default had a number of ripple effects, but the most important one on LTCM wouldn't be known by the public until late September, only days before the market finally hit bottom.

After the Russian debt default, stocks plunged until the beginning of September. The market was close to its ultimate low at that point, but only because of the subsequent successful rescue of LTCM.  Stocks then rallied for approximately three weeks. A bailout of LTCM was arranged by the Federal Reserve on September 23rd. The market then sold off until early October hitting a new low and then the decline  was over.

In the rally that followed the stock market experienced huge gains led by a bubble in tech stocks. This was a consequence of the Fed lowering interest rates and pumping too much money into the financial system. The Fed had a lot of leeway to do both in 1998 and still there were serious negative results between 2000 and 2002 when the tech bubble collapsed. Inflation wasn't a concern back then because commodity prices had been declining for almost two decades and were around their lows. It should be assumed that a failure to have successfully rescued LTCM would have caused a much bigger drop in stocks (as happened when the Fed didn't bail out Lehman Brothers in September 2008).

The Fed has a lot less ability to maneuver in August 2011. Fed funds rates have been at zero since December 2008. The Fed has already expanded its balance sheet by approximately $2 trillion since the Credit Crisis began. Commodities are closer to their all-time highs now, not their lows. Another bailout like the one in 1998 (which was minor compared to what occurred during the Credit Crisis) could send inflation assets into a bubble. Gold is already trading over $1800 today and seems to be leading the way.  

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The 2011 U.S Budget - Inflationary and Out of Control

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Two things happened the week before president Obama released his proposed 2011 budget today. First, in his State of Union address Obama promised a three-year freeze on domestic spending. Almost simultaneously, the U.S. congress raised the national debt ceiling by $1.9 trillion to $14.29 trillion. When it comes to politicians, investors would be wise to watch what they do and pay no attention to what they say.

There is no reason to believe that the U.S. spending orgy that was ratcheted up with the Credit Crisis is going to be controlled now, next year, the year after, nor the year after that. The 2011 fiscal year begins October 1, 2010. Obama's proposed budget includes $3.83 trillion in total spending and an estimated deficit of $1.27 trillion. The deficit would be much worse if the Bush tax cuts didn't expire at the end of 2010 and a proposed $90 billion tax on big banks wasn't being factored in. Higher taxes are Obama's approach to controlling the deficit, not less spending - and he is going to be raising taxes much higher if any deficit reduction is going to take place.

To be fair, president Obama only promised to control a small amount of the domestic spending part of the U.S. budget. This is estimated to be $447 billion or less than 12% of 2011 spending. The biggest U.S. budget items - military, social security and Medicare are not being frozen. No significant spending control is possible with this approach, but the public would never know it if they read the mainstream media headlines indicating otherwise.

The 2010 budget is also being affected by Obama's revised spending agenda. Last February, the 2010 budget deficit was supposed to come in at $1.2 trillion. In August, this was revised upward to $1.5 trillion. In a big news release, also just last week, the figure was lowered to $1.35 trillion. This allowed Obama to state that the deficit for 2010, the first budget Obama fully controlled, was less than the over $1.4 trillion in 2009. Well, that was last week when the cameras were rolling. Now that the State of the Union address is over, the 2010 deficit is now estimated at $1.56 trillion - almost $200 billion higher only one week later.

The U.S. national debt was an already huge $8.95 trillion by the end of 2007, when the Credit Crisis began to unfold. It could easily get to the new debt limit of $14.29 trillion long before the 2011 fiscal year is even finished (the national debt can increase by much more than just the budget deficit because of accounting tricks played with inter-governmental money transfers). The United States has only two ways of paying for its budget deficits. We either borrow the money - almost all of which comes from foreign sources - or we print it. At some point our lenders are going to say enough is enough and then the printing press will be our only option. There will be no way limit how much inflation will exist once that happens.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Gold Rallies Off Support; Inflation Threat Hasn't Disappeared

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.