Europe Continues Its Slide Toward the Precipice

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Finnish finance minister has said all eurozone countries are making contingency plans in case the currency union breaks up. With debt downgrades, bond market anomalies, troubled bailouts, and austerity packages with their associated riots becoming the new EU norm, their worries are obviously justified.

Last night, Moody's downgraded Italy's government bond rating two notches from A3 to Baa2. This is just above junk status. Moreover, the outlook is negative with further downgrades possible in the near future.  So what happened in the Italian government bond auction this morning?  Did buyers  demand higher interest rates to buy Italy's increasingly risky debt as basic economic principles would predict? No they didn't. Italy sold €3.5 billion of three-year bonds at an average yield of 4.65%, much less than the 5.3% it had to pay last month.  How is this possible? Apparently Italian banks couldn't resist an urge to grossly overpay for their governments newly issued debt. The ECB was most certainly backing them up behind the scenes. If this is how Italian banks do business, can we assume that they're solvent?

There is little need to pose that question for Spanish banks. Recent data indicate that they borrowed €365 billion in June from the ECB — a record amount. This compares to €325billion in May. These numbers indicate that Spanish banks have been closed out of the interbank lending market (a good indication of insolvency). The highly troubled Spanish banking sector, which has €3 trillion in debt on its books, will be receiving an immediate infusion of €30 billion in bailout funds from the EU and another €45 billion in November. This represents 2.5% of its total debt and that amount is supposed to fix the problem. The actual funds needed will be many times that. It is impossible to say exactly how much because the financial numbers for Spanish banks are not reliable.

Spain seems to be following Greece's descent into a self-reinforcing economic collapse. This week Prime Minister Rajoy announced further budget cuts of €65 billion over the next two years.  VAT was raised from 18% to 21%. Almost a quarter of the Spanish work force is unemployed, even worse than Greece's 22.5%. Spain though seems to be making a more serious effort at fiscal austerity than Greece. According to reports in the German daily Rheinische Post, the troika on its latest visit found that the Greek government failed to implement 210 of the 300 budget savings requirements it had agreed to in exchange for its bailout money.

While interest rates are pushing against unsustainable levels in Spain and Italy, they have gone to theoretically impossibly low levels in northern Europe. Negative interest rates first appeared in government debt in Denmark and the Netherlands last December. Then Germany paid negative rates on some of its short-term bonds starting in January. This week, France sold six-month Treasuries at a yield of -0.03% and two-year bonds at -0.001%. Below zero yields are a sign of severe market stress.

The euro this week has traded below 1.22 to the U.S. dollar, but is slightly higher today. Investors should watch the 1.20 level. If the euro breaks and stays below this area of support, it could drop to parity with the dollar. The major central banks would intervene to prevent this though, so the ride down wouldn't be smooth.

Stock markets reacted bullishly in late June and early July to the news of further bailouts in the EU. Most traders didn't ask where the money would come from, nor if the plans were even legally possible. They may not be. The German constitutional court will be ruling whether or not Angela Merkel's promises to participate in the ESM (European Stability Mechanism) can go forward.  Even if they rule favorably, there is little actual money committed to the ESM. More money printing (and the ECB has already done quite a bit) is the only option left to fund the various bailout schemes to save the euro. Of course, it's logically absurd that a fiat currency could be saved by producing excess amounts of it. The same is true for trying to solve a debt crisis by taking on more debt.  But hope reigns eternal in the land of euro make believe.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Selloff Might Pause Despite EU Debt Crisis

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The markets should soon find support on their current selloff, but this will only be temporary.  Europe's debt problems, which are at the epicenter of the current financial crisis, are not going to go away, they are only going to get worse until some realistic solution is found.

Stocks in Europe have been selling off for days and so have the euro and gold and silver. Only on Thursday did the U.S. markets start to drop significantly. Gold (GLD) and silver (SLV) managed to rally off deeply oversold conditions after reaching chart support around their lows from late last year. Even the euro (FXE) was trying to rally after getting close to its low from January. The major U.S. market indices are all approaching their 200-day moving averages (the Russell 2000 has already reached it). Some bounce should be expected at or just above those levels. Any upward movement should be considered to be a just a relief rally for now.

Once again the debt crisis in Europe has reared its ugly head. Greece is going to have new elections in June and an anti-bailout party is expected to win. Its credit rating was downgraded to CCC by Fitch on Thursday. An exit from the euro is now being seriously discussed in the halls of European power. At the same time, interest rates are rising in Spain and Italy to the levels where the Greek problem initially began.

Spanish 10-year government yields were as high as 6.38% this morning. The same Italian interest rates had reached just above 6.00% yesterday. Italy's rates were over 7.00% from last November to early January and Spain's were close to that level in November. The ECB then began a massive effort funded with money printing to drive them back down. It worked for a while, but as soon as the printing presses are paused, the market takes right back over.

The more serious problem is with the European banking system itself. Moody's downgraded 16 Spanish banks Thursday night and Spain had to partially nationalize Bankia last week. There was a run on Bankia Thursday and massive amounts of funds have been withdrawn from the entire Greek banking system. Contagion spreading to the major banks in the rest of the EU is a real danger. The LTRO (Long-Term Refinancing Operation) programs of the ECB have encouraged them to load up on the government debt of the failing peripheral countries. Many of the banks that did so were barely solvent as is.

More bailout programs from the central banks should be expected, but they aren't likely to work either. The real problems are with the non-functional economies. Spain is still building empty houses that no one buys and the Spanish banks are funding this activity.  Adding more debt to the problem is only going to make matters worse. Printing money to pay for that debt takes the problem to an even higher level. It all has to give at some point and it looks like the new few months will be one of crisis. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.


 

Buy When There's Blood on the Street - Just Make Sure It's Not Your Own

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Monday August 8th, the first trading day after S&P downgraded U.S. debt, was a crash day in the American stock market.  Asia held up much better and so did much of Europe, except for Germany.

The Dow Industrials were down 635 points (5.55%), the S&P 500 was down 80 points (6.66%), Nasdaq was down 175 points (6.90%) and the Russell 2000 64 points (8.89%). The DAX in Germany was down slightly more than 5%, whereas the Nikkei in Japan and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong were down a little more than 2%.  A crash is traditionally defined as a drop of 5% or more in a day. The Nasdaq and Russell 2000 already had a crash day last week. U.S. stocks had numerous crashes during the Credit Crisis in 2008.

Stocks looked like they were about to enter freefall - a severe uninterrupted drop - around 3:00PM.  President Obama delivered a statement on the S&P downgrade and caused a temporary short-term move up instead. The market would have washed out otherwise and been ready for its first rally.

As is, the market is at the end of its first stage of selling, we may just have to wait a little longer.  The technical indicators on the daily charts have either hit their lowest points or are very close to them. Some short covering and opportunistic buying should lead to a quick sharp rally for a few days. This rally is for traders only. The weekly technicals have yet to bottom out and nothing longer term should be expected.  

Technical bottoms and price bottoms are not the same. The technicals will have to gather some strength before stocks can enter a new rally phase. The ultimate price bottom is probably as much as two months out, which would put it somewhere in October. Until then, choppy action that brings the indices intermittently lower should be expected. While the indices may not go a lot lower, individual stocks, especially small cap, high-beta stocks (those known for their volatility) can indeed go much lower. This also includes high flyers that have yet to have had a big drop. In major selloffs, almost everything goes down.

Once a bottom is established, the volatile stocks you wanted to avoid in the selloff are the ones you want to own. This is where you will make the most money. Small, emerging, and leveraged are the keys. Smaller cap stocks will go down the most and then back up the most (just make sure the drop was market related and not because the business of the company is threatened). Emerging markets, both the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as well as smaller ones will have the same up and down behavior. Russia was down 12% on August 8th for instance. You will do better still if you use leverage on your buys. There are ETFs that provide 200% and 300% exposure. For the emerging markets, these include LBJ (300% Latin America), YINN (300% China), RUSL (300% Russia), EDC (300% Emerging Markets), INDL (200% India) and UBR (200% Brazil). For small cap stocks, TNA (300% long the Russell 2000 index) is the most leveraged play.

Traders should be able to make good use of these ETFs to move in and out of the market. Investors with a longer-term perspective will want to wait until a market bottom has had time to fully develop.  

Disclosure: Waiting to buy.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S Credit Rating Downgrade - A Humpty Dumpty Moment

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

As everyone knows by now, S&P downgraded the U.S. sovereign debt rating from AAA to AA+ on Friday. While the extent of the downgrade is minor, the implications are major. As the recent debt ceiling negotiations revealed, the U.S. cannot run its day-to-day operations without borrowing money. It lives on credit (as do most countries in the world today) and anything that impacts its ability to borrow money has serious consequences.

It takes a lot for a credit rating agency to lower the credit rating of a top corporation or country. This is usually only done long after the actual credit worthiness has experienced a significant decline.  The last major Friday afternoon credit downgrade from the credit rating agencies was when they lowered Bear Stearns rating on March 14, 2008. The company didn't open its doors again the following Monday.  The rating agencies were also tardy with lowering the credit ratings of accounting fraud poster child Enron, although they all did finally lower its rating to junk status four days before it declared bankruptcy. Perhaps the best analogy to the current U.S. situation though is the AAA ratings given to a number of securitized bonds that held subprime mortgages. These turned out not to be worthy of a top credit rating after all.

The farcical nature of how the credit agencies determine the rating of U.S. government debt was made clear during the debt ceiling negotiations. Numerous articles in the press reported that failure to come to an agreement, which would allow the U.S. to continue to spend money it didn't have because it could borrow more, would be viewed as fiscally irresponsible! A more rational response would have been, it's quite obvious that the U.S. can't function without borrowing an increasing amount of money and it is therefore insolvent. Under such circumstances its credit rating should be at the junk level - a BB or less - not an AA+. Eventually, this might happen, but as was the case with Enron, this would mean the U.S. would likely be going under a few days later.

The difference between the AA+ credit rating and the BB or lower one is caused by the fantasy factor. The AA+ rating is based on the glorious financial past of the U.S. and ignores the current downward trajectory it is on. Before the debt ceiling problems temporarily curtailed spending for a while, the U.S. was on course for as much as a $1.65 trillion budget deficit. This represents 11% of the current GDP number of $15 trillion (there are many reasons to think GDP is substantially overstated). It is true, that the U.S. is not borrowing money to pay for most of this deficit however - it's printing it. Quantitative Easing 2, a form of money printing, conducted by the Fed covered 70% of the deficit in the first half of the year. A country doing this certainly does not deserve an AAA credit rating, nor does it deserve an AA+ credit rating unless you can make a case that a company engaged in the business of counterfeiting money also deserves a close to top credit rating.

The Obama administration complained that S&P overestimated future U.S. deficits by $2 trillion. What this means is that S&P refused to accept the pie-in-the sky budgets numbers that the government generates. If you look at these, you will see that they assume GDP growth of over 5% a year, each and every year, until 2016. One year of GDP growth over 5% would be good and continual annual GDP growth of over 5% for the U.S. economy just isn't possible. The budget scenario also assumes very low inflation, which would certainly not be the case if the high growth it assumes takes place.  A combined deficit of $20 trillion in the next decade instead of the administration's $7.7 trillion would be more plausible. S&P assuming $2 more is still ridiculously low.

The immediate impact of the U.S. credit downgrade will be to cap the credit rating of companies at AA+. The government of the country has to have the highest credit rating in that country because in theory it has no default risk. Economists say that governments can use their ability to tax to pay off their debts. Although as finances deteriorate it is much more likely governments will print money to pay off their debts. No fiscally solvent government ever engages in excess money printing however. The U.S. Fed had increased its balance sheet (a measure of money printing) by $2 trillion since 2007. It doesn't appear that the credit agencies are taking this into account.

The longer-term implications for the lowered credit rating are far more serious.  More downgrades are likely. Interest rates will go up. Money will leave the United States. The U.S. dollar will lose its reserve currency status and this will lower its value substantially. Higher interest rates and a falling currency will both be inflationary. 

The financial world operates very much on image and reputation. Once that's shattered, it can take years to repair it, if it can be done at all.  When Bear Stearns was downgraded in March 2008, the damage to its ability to operate in the financial markets was terminal. The company imploded like an overinflated balloon that had a pin stuck in it. Fortunately, this is not likely to happen to the U.S. - at least not yet.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
Author: Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.