Euro Banks Up on Stress Test Farce

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Euro banks rallied nicely on Monday after results of the EU's stress test indicated there are essentially no problems in the European banking system. The stress tests have been heavily criticized as a whitewash and a cynical PR maneuver however. Nevertheless, rallies in bank stocks are continuing today on earnings reports from UBS, Deutsche Bank, Societe Generale and Credit Agricole.

Of the 91 EU banks analyzed for the stress tests, only 7 failed - five in Spain, one in Germany and only one in Greece. No bank in Portugal, Ireland or Italy failed the test and was deemed to be in need of raising more capital. The 7 banks that did fail were supposedly only short $4.5 billion. An alternative result produced by an analyst at JP Morgan indicated at least 54 banks should have failed the stress tests and at least $100 billion in new capital needed to be raised. Even that view may be optimistic.

Although considering the great earnings out today for UBS (UBS), Deutche Bank (DB), Societe Generale and Credit Agircole perhaps enough money is being poured into the euro banks from the ECB that it is irrelevant what condition they are in. After all, another bailout is potentially always around the corner. The UBS earnings were the most telling in this regard. One reason stated for UBS doing so well was that "withdrawals in the private banking arm have continued to slow". Yes, losing business at a slower rate is certainly bullish. The stock was up 7% on the news.

In a separate report released today, lending to non-financial companies was down 1.9% year over year in the EU. So euro bank earnings are rising even though less lending is taking place to businesses. Interesting, to say the least. Mortgage lending in the EU is going up at a 3.4% annual rate however. So maybe some minor reinflation of the real estate bubble is taking place in Europe while the economy slows down. That certainly bodes well for the future.

The stress tests show once again that any number, no matter how outrageously manipulated or false, will be accepted by the market as gospel.  We saw this last week with the UK second quarter GDP figures. The construction spending number was up by an amount indicating a major building boom was taking place even though there is no other evidence of a big pick up in construction. The fact that the reported numbers didn't match up with reality apparently didn't disturb anyone. You would think it would have since the current EU financial crisis that necessitated the stress tests was cause by Greece lying about its fiscal state. Greece's numbers were off by more than 400%, but no one in EU headquarters noticed any problem with them.

When economic or business numbers are fantasies, but are accepted anyway, a major crisis will invariably follow. Before the Greek debt crisis, there was a the subprime crisis in the U.S. Bundles of subprime loans - loans from borrowers who had no job, no assets, and no history of paying their bills - were believed to be triple A credits because some authority said they were. This allowed common sense to be thrown out the window and complete absurdity to be regarded as wisdom. This type of behavior though isn't as bad right now as it was during the subprime era - it's actually much worse.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Unwinding the Fantasy Trade

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Stocks plunged after the open today on the Chicago Purchasing Managers report which indicated contraction in the largest manufacturing region of the U.S. Also this morning, commercial lender CIT, one of the largest sources of loans in the U.S. for small and midsized business, is on the verge of collapse. The company has received $5.3 billion in federal bailout money so far... and even after that, it is still having trouble staying afloat (it will be the fifth biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history if it goes under). Yesterday's September Consumer Confidence number fell instead of going up as economists predicted. Added to all this, the FDIC board voted to ask solvent banks to pre-pay the next three years of their insurance premiums so its deposit insurance fund won't run out of money. Just more evidence of how well the banking system has been 'stabilized' and how well the economic 'recovery' is doing.

The 4th quarter begins tomorrow and the first four trading days should give us a good indication about whether or not the big money will be selling stocks. A net drop in stock prices during this period will be negative going forward. The rally that has taken place since March has a typical bear market pattern to it. In the case of the Dow and S&P 500 it just shot straight up without any basing pattern forming. The rally that followed the 2000 to 2002 sell off, had a ten-month base and this is what allowed it to continue for several years. Stocks have also reached historically overbought levels based on the percentage of stocks trading above their 200-day moving average (the definition of a rally). This reached 95% on the NYSE. Previously a number in the low 70's would have been enough to create a top. While stocks have skyrocketed, Nasdaq up 68%, S&P 500 up 57% and the Dow up nearly 50%, volume has not. Volume on the Dow has continually declined during the entire rally - a very bearish pattern. Even worse a handful of junk financials, traded mostly by computer, have accounted for a large percentage of overall NYSE volume.

Stocks, and bonds as well, have had spectacular rallies because the monetary authorities have pumped an unprecedented amount of money (a lot of it newly printed) into the financial system. The U.S. government additionally changed its accounting rules and this magically made the close to worthless subprime debt held by financial companies worth a lot more overnight. The rising prices of stocks and bonds that followed have been used as evidence that the economy is recovering and along with the accounting rule changes allowed banks and brokers to report significant, but illusory, profits last quarter. The IMF has helped perpetuate this financial fantasy in a just released report that estimates that bank's losses from the Credit Crisis will only be $3.4 trillion now instead of a previously estimated $4 trillion. The logic behind their reasoning? Stock and bond prices have gone up! The IMF is still willing to admit however that U.S. banks have yet to recognize 40% of their losses and UK and euro zone banks 60% of their losses from the Credit Crisis. It warned that monetary policy makers had better consider this before deciding to withdraw the massive stimulus programs that are currently in place.

Government stimulus can only work so long in keeping stock prices up. The Japanese found this out in the 1990s and early 2000s. The Nikkei had more than one spectacular rally, but each time the rally failed because stimulus programs ended or were eventually cut back. New stimulus programs were then created and the cycle began all over again. The one thing the Japanese didn't do was fix the underlying problems with their banking system. The U.S. has not done so either and until this happens, the government can produce all the economic 'recoveries' it wants to, but they won't last. What will last is the inflation caused by all the money printing needed to produce the recoveries.

NEXT: If You Ignore the Facts, Things Are Good

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

New York Investing Meetup Versus the SEC

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

I would like to thank the 145 people who braved a snow storm last night to come to the February general meeting of the New York Investing meetup. In addition to the scheduled talks on the State of the Market (and why gold is looking good and oil could have a pop up in the near future), the Credit Crisis Update and Art Investing, Shelley Gould flew in from San Francisco and gave a couple of minute introduction to her new SmartStops service. While New York Investing meets the needs of the investing public as long as New York City hasn't been shut down, investors unfortunately don't receive such dedication from the watchdog government agencies that are suppose to be protecting their money.

New allegations arose last night against the SEC and FINRA (the the brokerage industry's self-policing organization). Harry Markopolos, the securities industry executive and fraud investigator who brought allegations against Bernard Madoff to the SEC by 2000, if not earlier, is now saying he feared for his personal and family's safety because of the SEC's inaction (and indeed he should have). Markopolos submitted detailed evidence to the SEC in Boston, New York, and Washington about Madoff's scam and as we all know too well, the SEC did nothing. Markopolos will be appearing before a congressional investigatory committee today.

Markopolos was not alone in being suspicious of Madoff. Anyone who examined his trading strategy knew immediately it was a fraud. How? His trading would have been bigger than the entire volume of the markets he claimed to be trading in. While even a casual observer would realize something crooked was going on, the public watchdog SEC couldn't figure it out. While you may think nothing like this could have happened before, you would be mistaken. The 1962 Salad Oil Scandal (a $175 million fraud then or about $1 billion in today's money) required the same suspension of common sense from the 51 Wall Street banks that lent money to the perpetrator, Tino De Angelis. De Angelis borrowed money from these banks based on his inventory of salad oil, stored in huge tanks in New Jersey which actually contained water with a thin layer of salad oil floating on the top (so field inspectors did indeed see oil when they looked into the top of the tanks). However, publicly available information published by the U.S. government indicated there was less salad oil in the entire United States than De Angelis claimed he had in his New Jersey storage facilities. Apparently this wasn't enough to make Wall Street banks avoid lending to him, just as their contemporaries would make loans to people without any income or assets. Consider this the next time you are tempted to follow Wall Street's investing advice.

In case you may also be thinking things are now going to get a lot better, I would advise you not to get too hopeful just yet. The new head of the SEC is Mary Schapiro (replacing See-No-Evil Christopher Cox). Ms. Schapiro was previously the head of FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority). FINRA at least investigated Madoff several times. They found nothing out of the ordinary and claim they couldn't have because they were only empowered to examine his brokerage business (an almost guaranteed destination of some of the missing $50 billion) and the fraud was perpetrated through his investment business. Congress claims that it was not particularly impressed with It's-Not-My-Job Mary Schapiro's performance in this circumstance. Nevertheless she is now in charge of protecting the public's investments.

NEXT: Only TARP Recipients Should Worry About Deflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.