FDIC Swan Song: 8 Banks a Week

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The FDIC closed down eight banks last week bringing this year's total to 118 so far. Included in this week's closures was the notorious ShoreBank in Chicago. In a separate report, the U.S. Treasury has disclosed that the Obama administration's HAMP (Home Affordable Mortgage Program) seems to be rapidly falling apart. This could further weaken the U.S. banking system.

The FDIC is operating on both borrowed time and borrowed money. This agency is the bulwark protecting American's savings in the case of failed banks, but the FDIC itself is close to going broke. The eight closures this week alone cost the FDIC’s deposit-insurance fund $473.5 million. The deposit insurance fund was already $20.9 billion in the hole at the end of the fourth quarter in 2009. In order to plug the hole and keep going, the FDIC in December forced banks to prepay three years of insurance premiums and raised about $45 billion by doing so. That money had to pay off the deficit already accumulated and then last for the next 156 months of bailouts. There have been weeks this year when the FDIC has had to shell out close to $1 billion for bank rescues. That $45 billion isn't going to last much longer.

ShoreBank was the most significant bailout this week. The bank was founded in the South Side of Chicago in 1973 and was the nation's first community development and environmental bank. Goldman Sachs (GS), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC), American Express (AXP), GE Capital (GE), and Wells Fargo (WFC) were investors. The bank has indirect ties to a number of members of the Obama administration. The bank was under a cease-and-desist order from the FDIC for more than a year before it was finally closed down. Its remaining assets will be transferred to a newly created corporation, Urban Partnership Bank. Some of the same executives from ShoreBank will be running this newly chartered bank (once they drive Urban Partnership Bank into the ground, it too will be bailed out). It looks like the investments of the too-big-to-fail, or even lose any money, big bank funders will also be protected under this arrangement by transferring them to Urban Partnership Bank.

Meanwhile, the poorly thought out and even more poorly run HAMP program is not making a big dent in slowing foreclosures. Nearly half of the 1.3 million homeowners who enrolled in the Obama administration's flagship mortgage-relief program have already fallen or more likely been pushed out. Mortgage holders blame the banks for not cooperating and banks blame the mortgage holders. According to RealtyTrac, the nation is headed toward more than one million foreclosures this year - a higher amount than the 900,000 homes repossessed in 2009. Boy, HAMP is certainly doing a great job in significantly reducing the number of foreclosures. Well, I guess it's just too much too expect that something will be accomplished for only $75 billion in taxpayer money.

Based on this week's events, I have written the following theme song for the FDIC (maybe Sheila Blair will sing it at the next board meeting) to be sung to the tune of the Beatles 'Eight Days a Week':

Oh I'll bail out your bank babe,
Guess you know it's through,
Hope you like the money banker,
When I'm funding you,
Spent it, Lost it, Pay Me, Save Me
Don't do nothing but bailouts,
Eight banks a week


Disclosure: No positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Financial System Gets Its Own Stress Test

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Banks failures kept climbing and the Asset Back Security market completely froze up. While it sounds like a grim description of the height of the Credit Crisis, it was actually the week of July 19th.

In little reported news, there was no issuance of asset backed securities (ABS) last week. Large companies rely on this type of financing to fund their short term needs. The collapse of this market in the fall of 2008 was one of the key reasons that economic activity ground to a halt. Recently, everything looked OK for the ABS market. During the ten weeks prior to July 19th average issuance was $1.83 billion per week. Then suddenly it was zero.

The overnight disappearance of funding was an unintended consequence of the new financial 'reform' bill. One of the provisions of the bill made the rating agencies liable for their ratings - a laudable idea. However, there was no provision on the other side that prevented them from taking money for their ratings and then refusing to have them made public, which the rating agencies promptly did in the ABS market. Companies were already required by law to have their ABS paper rated before financial reform - essentially giving the ratings agencies a government enforced duopoly. So without ratings nothing could be sent to market. Even Ford Motor had to pull a major offering. To unfreeze the market, the SEC promptly ruled that ABS paper could be sold without a rating for the next six months. This too could have unintended consequences.

The Credit Crisis was also being revisited with a U.S. banking system that still looks shaky. So far this year, 103 U.S. banks have failed compared to 65 at the same time last year. At the current rate, failures could exceed 200 in 2010. This is roughly on par on a percentage basis with the worse period of the Savings and Loan Crisis. However, the FDIC, which insures bank deposits, didn't go under during the Savings and Loan Crisis. This will happen this time. There are even rumors that the FDIC is delaying taking over insolvent banks to delay its own insolvency. These rumors are probably not true because doing so wouldn't buy the FDIC that much time. Expect the federal government to bail it out with a 'loan' or some other 'line of credit'.

The problems that surfaced during the Credit Crisis have obviously not all been solved. Investors should assume that the after effects will have to be dealt with for years to come. Government solutions for dealing with these problems may themselves in turn cause other problems. The corruption in the system certainly hasn't gone away. The ratings agencies gave baskets of subprime loans triple A ratings and now they have refused to let their ratings be used for asset backed securities because of potential liability. So how accurate do think their ratings are now?   And why does the U.S. government force companies to pay them for the ratings if companies aren't guaranteed anything in return for their money?  If this type of activity took place between two businesses, it would be called an extortion racket. The FDIC forcing banks to prepay three years of deposit insurance premiums could be viewed the same way.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank Failures Driving FDIC to Insolvency

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


In December of 2009, the FDIC ordered U.S. banks to make three years of prepayments to its deposit  insurance fund. It looks like the FDIC has already blown through the $15.33 billion it collected at the end of last year and will soon be needing its own bailout.

As of July 16th, 96 U.S. banks have failed. The total was 86 at the end of the first six months of the year. A simple doubling of the number would indicate that there will be 172 failures this year. Estimates though are for around 200. More failures took place in the second half of the year in 2009. Total failures for 2009 were 140 compared to only 25 in 2008 and 3 in 2007. There is no question that the number of failures will be greater once again in 2010.

The FDIC maintains a troubled bank list and there are 775 banks on that list as of the end of the first quarter. That was up from 702 in the fourth quarter of 2009. Since failed banks are removed from the list, this indicates that more banks are getting into trouble than the number failing. As long as this continues to happen, the U.S. banking system is deteriorating further. Commercial loans going sour are now being added to the problem of too many bad residential real estate loans.

Investors should not be fooled by comparisons of current U.S. bank failures with the number of failures in the past. In the early 1900s, there were a very large number of small banks in the country. Over the last 80 years, U.S. banks have become much larger and far fewer in number so only a percentage comparison makes any sense. During the Great Depression, 9146 banks failed. That would represent over 100% of the 7932 banks that now exist. Even during the Savings and Loan Crisis there were more than twice as many banks in business than there are now. The total number of failures for the Depression and Savings and Loan Crisis are also for a period of up to 15 years. So we will have to wait until 2023 to see if banking failures are or aren't as bad now as they were during past crises.

We are not likely to have to wait very long however to see if the FDIC needs a government bailout for the first time. The FDIC states very clearly on its website that its operations are funded through member banks and it doesn't require taxpayer money. Well accepting a "loan" from the federal government or whatever they will call the bailout is taking help from the taxpayer. For a long time, I have been predicting that this event will be taking place in the fall of 2010. As of now, it looks like the FDIC may have trouble holding off insolvency even until then.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Economy Continues to Deteriorate Despite 'Recovery'

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


A number of economic reports in the last few days indicate that the U.S. economy has not only not failed to recover from the recession, but continues to fall deeper into a hole. Banking, consumer confidence, employment numbers, durable goods and the housing industry - each representing a different aspect of the economy - are all sending out troubling signs. Despite the onslaught of negative data, mainstream economists continue to echo the official U.S. government view that "the recovery is still on track".

Updated statistics from the FDIC indicate that there were 702 banks on the troubled list as the end of 2009. This is an increase of 27% from the third quarter. FDIC numbers also show that U.S. banks cut lending by 7.5% in the fourth quarter of last year. Since lending is the lifeblood of the economy this doesn't bode well for the future. The FDIC also had to put aside an additional $17.8 billion for future bank failures. Its deposit insurance fund is now at a negative $20.9 billion. Despite statements that it has enough cash to keep operating (Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers made similar claims), it is only a matter of time before the FDIC is bailed out. This will take place before the end of the year and will be done by tapping a line of credit from the Treasury department. Expect this event to be downplayed by mainstream media reports with claims that it is not really a bailout.

While the U.S. banking system continues to dissolve, consumers are losing confidence in the economy. The Conference Board numbers for February fell a whopping 10.5 points to 46 (around 100 is a good number). The present situation subindex fell to 19.4, the lowest level since February 1983 when the U.S. was trying to recover from a severe double dip recession. Before the Credit Crisis, consumer spending represented 72% of the U.S. economy. Without their participation, a sustainable recovery is not possible. Other reports indicate there is no way in the near future that consumers can resume their vital economic role. Consumers not only don't have credit, credit card debt was dropping at close to a 20% annual rate at the end of last year, but they are worried about the job market as well.

The weekly jobless claims indicate why the job picture is still troubling. Initial claims were up 22,000 last week to 496,000 (a number around 400,000 indicates recession and 300,000 indicates a healthy economy).  These numbers are highly volatile because they come from state unemployment offices that are notorious for backlogs in processing the claims. This problem occurred during the holiday season and the claim numbers were consequently lower. The mainstream media then fell all over itself to report the tremendous improvement in the employment picture, instead of the real story of bureaucratic incompetence that was preventing accurate numbers from being produced.  Market watchers usually only pay attention to the four-week moving average to get around this problem. This number has risen by 30,000 to 473,750 in the last four-weeks.

The just released Durable Goods report got major headlines about how bullish the number was. This is only the case as long as you don't look at the details of the report. Responsible for the good headline number was a 126% increase in civilian aircraft orders (these orders can be cancelled by the way). Outside of transportation, orders fell 0.6%. Core capital equipment and machinery orders dropped 2.9% and 9.7% respectively. These two numbers are the important ones that determine the direction of the economy. For all of 2009, durable goods fell a record 20%.

Finally, housing doesn't look like it is in recovery mode either. Housing was the epicenter of the Credit Crisis and it will be years before all the damage wrought by the bubble will be worked out. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgage applications for home purchases have just fallen to a 13-year low. New home sales in the U.S. fell to the lowest level on record in January (records go back almost 50 years). Government nationalized Freddie Mac reported it lost another $7.8 billion in the fourth quarter. That brings its total loss to $25.7 billion for all of 2009. Freddie Mac purchased or guaranteed one in four U.S. home loans in 2009. The Obama administration has promised a blank check to Freddie along with its companion housing entity Fannie Mae, also nationalized and bleeding money, to cover losses up until 2012.

This is little evidence that the U.S. economy has recovered from the recession or is going to recover from the recession any time soon. The support for the recovery viewpoint comes from government statistics that have been highly manipulated. All governments of course want to present a rosy picture of their handling of the economy for political reasons and it is much easier to make the numbers better than it is to actually make the economy better. Eventually the public catches on to this game however. The recent consumer confidence numbers indicate that the American public is no longer buying the public relations story, but is starting to pay more attention to the realities they have to face on a day to day basis.

Disclosure: No positions

NEXT: The Impossible Contradictions of U.S. Consumer Spending

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Future U.S. Bailouts - FHA, FDIC, PBGC, U.S. States

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

There is no end in sight for U.S. bailouts stemming from the Credit Crisis. Once you've bailed out wealthy Wall Street bankers (and there are a handful of Federal Reserve programs for this in addition to $700 billion TARP program), it isn't politically tenable to say no to pensioners, savers, homeowners. and local governments. It should be kept in mind that the Credit Crisis didn't create the problems, but merely exposed the rot in the system that had been there for many years. As Warren Buffett most famously said, "you only know who's swimming naked when the tide goes out". Well, a lot of U.S. government operations have been swimming naked for years and the Credit Crisis caused the tide to go out.

The problems center around housing, banking, pensions, and government operations that don't have the money printing ability of the federal government. The government already nationalized massive housing loan entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008 and these have become bottomless pits for government aid. Fannie lost $18.9 billion in the third quarter of this year and requested an additional $15 billion in funding. Things would be even worse, if much of the loans that had previously been handled by Fannie and Freddie weren't now being insured by the FHA (Federal Housing Administration). The FHA is now backing loans that would have made a crooked subprime mortgage broker blush in the heyday of the housing bubble. When it comes to getting FHA insurance these days, bad credit, a spotty work history, and even a previous foreclosure aren't deal breakers. Not surprisingly, FHA finances are spiraling downhill fast and warnings about a need for a bailout are already becoming louder.

The FDIC has temporarily solved its need for a bailout, with temporarily being the operative word. On November 12th the FDIC mandated that banks pay three years of their insurance premiums up front. This will provide the FDIC's insolvent bank deposit insurance program with an immediate cash infusion of $45 billion. Unfortunately, the FDIC itself estimates that its funding needs will be $100 billion in the next four years. Assuming they only need that amount (which is possibly very optimistic), they will still have a serious short fall. There have been 123 U.S bank failures as of mid-November and the ones on November 13th cost the FDIC approximately a billion dollars. That's for just one week. At that rate, the FDIC would be out of money again in 45 weeks.

The PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation), a government chartered company that insures U.S. pensions is another operation which is heading toward a bailout. In its 35 years of operation, it has lost money in 29. Losses have even taken place when the U.S. economy was strong and the stock market rallied. In bad years, the PBGC loses even more money. So far in 2009, it has taken over 144 failed pension programs compared to 67 in 2008. It was $22 billion in the red this year. According to an inspector general's report, the PBGC's former director was alleged to have had improper contacts with Wall Street. When questioned by a congressional panel, he took the Fifth Amendment (refusing to answer because it might incriminate him). Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives also had serious ethical problems. Corruption and bailouts seem to go hand in hand.

While California's budget woes are well known, there are nine other U.S. states that are in serious financial trouble and an additional ten not far behind them. California has a $121 billion budget gap and is resorting to IOUs to make payments. According to the Pew Center, the nine other states in serious trouble are Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Florida (states hit hardest by the housing downturn along with California), Rhode Island, Oregon, New Jersey, Illinois and Wisconsin. High unemployment and reduced business activity have caused tax receipts to plummet and are behind the current fiscal distress. There is little evidence the problem is getting better despite claims by the federal authorities and mainstream economists that the recession is over. The federal government has the same problem as the states, but it just prints money to make ends meet. While the feds can bail out the states, who's going to bail out the U.S. when money printing doesn't work anymore?

NEXT: The Art of Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank Bankruptcy Bonanza

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

CIT filed for bankruptcy in New York on Sunday. This is the fourth biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history, just behind number three General Motors (Lehman Brothers was number one). The CIT bankruptcy filing followed nine bank failures on Friday, which coincidentally involved the 4th largest bank failure this year. The FDIC Insurance fund which pays off depositors of failed banks is itself bankrupt. CIT itself is a bank holding company and became one last year in order to TARP funds. It will not be countered as a failed bank since it is expected to come out of bankruptcy.

The amount of money the government put into CIT was a small $2.3 billion (compared to $45 billion put directly into Citibank). CIT was not deemed too big to fail. It has actually been on the verge of collapse for several months now and almost went under in July. Lots of parties have been holding it up, including Goldman Sachs, with temporary measures since then - and for good reason. CIT is the largest loan provider for small and medium sized business in the U.S and 300,000 retail outlets are at least partially dependent on it for their merchandise. Imagine the impact on the holiday shopping season (goods are already at the stores by this point) if CIT had failed in the summer? The U.S. economy would have taken a major hit since retailing is its largest industry.

The federal government's indifference to CIT puts the lie to Bernanke, Paulson and Geithner's claims that the TARP government bailout money was to restore lending and support the economy. The biggest U.S. lender to small and medium size businesses has been allowed to fail. Before the failure, its was drastically cutting its loans to try and stay afloat. CIT lent $11.3 billion in the first half of 2008, but only $4.4 billion in the first half of 2009. While this was taking place the large banks, who got copious amounts of TARP money to increase lending, were cutting consumer credit sharply. So the U.S. has moved toward an economy where only big businesses and the rich are supplied with adequate credit (a third-world model). There is no way an actual economic recovery can take place given this situation.

Of course the government will probably come up with a plan for the CIT post-bankruptcy. I imagine a Cash Loans for Clunker Businesses program where huge amounts of money are lent to insolvent subprime businesses that don't have a chance of every making any money (businesses with Washington connections will be at the top of the list and get 99% of the funding). Bernanke is probably starting up the printing presses right now to pay for it. Just as a reminder, Bernanke claims he and the other central bankers 'saved' the financial system last year and he has been heralded by Obama for preventing another depression. With 115 bank failures this year and counting, a major financial company bankruptcy, and an insolvent FDIC bank insurance fund, the financial system isn't looking so 'saved' lately. Well, at least we've got the stock market, which just had its best seven month performance since 1933 . Hey, wasn't that during the Great Depression?

NEXT: Markets Roller Coaster Ride Powered by Media Hype

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Subprime Crisis #2 Coming Soon

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

It constantly amazes me that the people running the government and reporters who cover the government seem incapable of doing arithmetic at the first grade level. This is usually all that is necessary to foresee a disastrous outcome in the future. This is certainly the case with the impending FHA (Federal Housing Administration) crisis which will be blowing up soon. The FHA insures mortgages that have less than a 20% down payment. It is currently insuring four times as many mortgages daily as it did in 2006 at the height of the last subprime crisis and has 5.4 million loans on its books. A prominent congresswomen recently stated, "without the FHA there would be no mortgage market" right now.

In congressional testimony the head of this government agency recently stated that the FHA's finances were sound. Oh really? The FHA claims to have $30 billion in cash reserves. How long will that last considering that there are $675 billion in loans on the books and 24% of the loans from 2007 are troubled and 20% of the 2008 loans are troubled so far (these numbers can rise). Those percentages could be worse in 2009 and after. If more than 4.4% of the loans insured by the FHA go bad, it could be out of money, assuming (probably foolishly) that the $30 billion they claim in cash is unencumbered. If not, the percentage could be much, much less than 4.4%.

How is it possible that there be even more problem loans on the FHA books from this year and in the future? Anecdotal reports from some areas of the country say that as much as 100% of recent housing purchases are insured by the FHA. All you need to get this insurance is apparently a 3.5% down payment. A spotty employment record doesn't disqualify you, nor does having filed for bankruptcy in the past. Even more eye popping, having a previous mortgage that went into foreclosure does not keep you from getting a new loan insured by the FHA! The FHA business model is roughly equivalent to a company offering $100,000 life insurance policies for $100 to hospital patients who are on life support. Yet, the head of the agency claims that their finances are in good shape.

The FHA is only one of many new bailouts coming. A number of state and local governments are falling deeper into the red. Tax receipts are coming it at even lower levels than anything previously thought possible (another mystery of the 'recovering' economy). Small and midsized banks are falling like dominoes because of their commercial loans going sour. The FDIC insurance fund is already insolvent and the government will have to step in to prop it up. The Credit Crisis is by no means over, we have simply finished phase one and are about to enter phase two. But don't worry, the U.S. government has a printing press and can print all the money necessary to solve these upcoming problems.

NEXT: Dollar Breaks Support ... Again

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Recovery? Don't Bank on It

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

As of Friday, 98 U.S. banks have failed this year and the FDIC Deposit Insurance fund is on the brink of insolvency. The fund now covers only 0.22% of U.S. bank deposits, whereas a 1.15% minimum is mandated by law. At the end of second quarter 416 banks were on the FDIC's troubled list (this number should be updated in about another month), so the steady drip of money leaking out of the fund could turn into a torrent. Commercial loan defaults are the current crisis hitting the system and this problem has just begun. While you may be surprised that this could be happening after Fed Chair Ben Bernanke has repeatedly told us that the banking system was saved last year, a government report released today indicated that the public had been lied to about just this very subject.

A special inspector general investigating the handling of the bank rescue program TARP in the fall of 2008 found that then Treasury Secretary Paulson and other officials falsely claimed that the first 9 institutions getting funds were sound. Paulson specifically stated, "These are healthy institutions ...". At the time, Merrill Lynch was actually collapsing. Citibank and Bank of America subsequently required significant additional funds to stay afloat. The report was criticized by Assistant Treasury Secretary Herbert Allison Jr., who now heads the bailout program for the government. Allison maintains that any critique of the announcements made a year ago should take into consideration the unprecedented circumstances facing financial regulators at the time. In other words, the government feels that it is justified in blatantly lying to the public if a crisis is taking place. Let me repeat that: the government feels that it is justified in blatantly lying to the public if a crisis is taking place. Let me follow that up by pointing out that there is both a credit and economic crisis still taking place.

The FDIC itself has given us more than enough reason to think the U.S. banking system has not actually been rescued. Other than the domino like collapse of smaller and midsized banks that is now occuring, the FDIC's figures state that in aggregate U.S banks lost $3.7 billion in the second quarter, even though almost every large U.S. bank reported major profits. Of course the major banks have received massive injections of government aid, while the smaller banks have not. This is a move afoot to try to inject TARP funds into smaller banks to prevent defaults on a mass scale.

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, what is taking place in the U.S. now is very similar to what took place in Japan in the 1990s. Japan had a banking system dominated by a small number of large institutions. The first 9 recipients of TARP funds controlled 75% of the assets in the U.S. banking system. In both cases, banks were allowed to become so large that a failure of even one of them endangered the entire financial system. Japan has propped up its banking system for two decades now and the cost has been an economy unable to grow unless there is government stimulus. Personally, I am waiting to see what the U.S. government is going to do to rev up the economy next quarter now that the Cash for Clunkers program has expired.

NEXT: Gold! Record High Knocking on Heaven's Door

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Unwinding the Fantasy Trade

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Stocks plunged after the open today on the Chicago Purchasing Managers report which indicated contraction in the largest manufacturing region of the U.S. Also this morning, commercial lender CIT, one of the largest sources of loans in the U.S. for small and midsized business, is on the verge of collapse. The company has received $5.3 billion in federal bailout money so far... and even after that, it is still having trouble staying afloat (it will be the fifth biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history if it goes under). Yesterday's September Consumer Confidence number fell instead of going up as economists predicted. Added to all this, the FDIC board voted to ask solvent banks to pre-pay the next three years of their insurance premiums so its deposit insurance fund won't run out of money. Just more evidence of how well the banking system has been 'stabilized' and how well the economic 'recovery' is doing.

The 4th quarter begins tomorrow and the first four trading days should give us a good indication about whether or not the big money will be selling stocks. A net drop in stock prices during this period will be negative going forward. The rally that has taken place since March has a typical bear market pattern to it. In the case of the Dow and S&P 500 it just shot straight up without any basing pattern forming. The rally that followed the 2000 to 2002 sell off, had a ten-month base and this is what allowed it to continue for several years. Stocks have also reached historically overbought levels based on the percentage of stocks trading above their 200-day moving average (the definition of a rally). This reached 95% on the NYSE. Previously a number in the low 70's would have been enough to create a top. While stocks have skyrocketed, Nasdaq up 68%, S&P 500 up 57% and the Dow up nearly 50%, volume has not. Volume on the Dow has continually declined during the entire rally - a very bearish pattern. Even worse a handful of junk financials, traded mostly by computer, have accounted for a large percentage of overall NYSE volume.

Stocks, and bonds as well, have had spectacular rallies because the monetary authorities have pumped an unprecedented amount of money (a lot of it newly printed) into the financial system. The U.S. government additionally changed its accounting rules and this magically made the close to worthless subprime debt held by financial companies worth a lot more overnight. The rising prices of stocks and bonds that followed have been used as evidence that the economy is recovering and along with the accounting rule changes allowed banks and brokers to report significant, but illusory, profits last quarter. The IMF has helped perpetuate this financial fantasy in a just released report that estimates that bank's losses from the Credit Crisis will only be $3.4 trillion now instead of a previously estimated $4 trillion. The logic behind their reasoning? Stock and bond prices have gone up! The IMF is still willing to admit however that U.S. banks have yet to recognize 40% of their losses and UK and euro zone banks 60% of their losses from the Credit Crisis. It warned that monetary policy makers had better consider this before deciding to withdraw the massive stimulus programs that are currently in place.

Government stimulus can only work so long in keeping stock prices up. The Japanese found this out in the 1990s and early 2000s. The Nikkei had more than one spectacular rally, but each time the rally failed because stimulus programs ended or were eventually cut back. New stimulus programs were then created and the cycle began all over again. The one thing the Japanese didn't do was fix the underlying problems with their banking system. The U.S. has not done so either and until this happens, the government can produce all the economic 'recoveries' it wants to, but they won't last. What will last is the inflation caused by all the money printing needed to produce the recoveries.

NEXT: If You Ignore the Facts, Things Are Good

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Enron Accounting and GDP; FDIC's Money Shortage

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Second quarter GDP revisions were out this morning and they were unchanged from the down 1.0% in the first reporting. The government claims that while some components of the GDP numbers declined, increases in other components offset the losses. Components revised upward included government spending (what a surprise). State and local government spending was supposedly up 3.6% (federal spending up 11%) even though over 30 state governments are now considered to be in serious financial trouble. In a separate report, the FDIC is once again about to run out of money because of the increasing rate of bank failures that are taking place even though Fed Chair Bernanke has told us repeatedly that the financial system has been fixed.

While the state and local government spending numbers are suspicious to say the least, far more suspicious is the corporate profits component of the GDP report. Before-tax corporate profits supposedly increased $67.6 billion or by 5.7% quarterly. This was the biggest increase in four years and even larger than the 5.3% gain in the first quarter. You may be wondering how can corporate profits increase by large amounts during the worst recession since the 1930s? Quite simply, they can't. Even worse, proof of the inaccuracy of these numbers is supported by the net cash flow figures in the GDP report. These fell by $26.9 billion. Companies that are actually making money generate cash. Those who are lying about making money don't. This is what happened with Enron. It claimed to have substantial profits, but its cash flow indicated that it didn't. While this smoking gun was right there is the published figures, Wall Street and the mainstream financial media talked up the stock almost to the day that the company declared bankruptcy.

Other components from the report indicate an economy that is in extremely bad shape. Amazingly, even though corporations are making those huge profits, business investment fell 10.9% after plunging at a record depression level 39.2% annual rate in the first quarter. Another impossible statistic in the report is disposable income for consumers. The GDP report claims this went up 3.8% despite the severe recession. However, according to the report the savings rate rose 5.0%, which means that this increased fantasy income wasn't flowing into the economy. Exports, which the Fed and economists have pointed to as one of the cornerstones of the 'resurgent' economy, fell 5%. Imports fell 15.1%. Collapsing trade is a sign of a sick economy. Even though we have heard repeatedly from the media and the Fed that the U.S. real estate market has bottomed, investments in housing fell for the 14th consecutive quarter, dropping at a 22.8% annual rate -that's some recovery all right.

Also contradicting the government's 'economy is getting better' PR blitz, is the continuing failures of U.S. banks. This problem hasn't been solved, it has merely been swept under the rug. The FDIC's deposit fund will be running out of money sometime later this year. It would have run out of money last year if it had to pay off for either the Washington Mutual or Wachovia failures. Both were handled outside the system with the U.S. Treasury making guarantees for the acquiring banks. So far 81 banks have failed this year and the number of banks on the FDIC's troubled list is now 416 (up from 305 at the end of the first quarter). This is the largest number since the Savings and Loan Crisis. Banks insured by the FDIC swung to a total quarterly loss of $3.7 billion in Q2. It looks like we can expect a lot more bank failures in the future.

NEXT: Commodities, the Dollar and More Government Fantasy

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Consumer Confidence Game and Housing's False Bottom

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Signs of a "resurgent economy" are everywhere - at least if you believe the reporting of the mainstream media. The "recession appears to be over" and "the U.S. economic ship is finally righting itself" according to one 'expert' after another quoted in news articles. Examination of the data backing up these claims indicates the truth might be quite different. While there was supposedly 'good news' on consumer confidence and housing prices yesterday (as long as you didn't look too closely at the numbers), it was little noticed that the White House raised its projected budget deficits to a total $9 trillion between 2010 and 2019. The budget deficits for the next decade will only be this good as long as the economy is growing at a robust pace and inflation remains unusually low. This is the most optimistic possibility imaginable, with imagine being the key concept here.

The Conference Board released its monthly consumer confidence survey yesterday. It came in at 54.1 and was up from 47.4 in July. The results are very different form the University of Michigan survey which had consumer confidence plummeting only a couple of weeks ago. What caused the big rise? Consumer's view of the current economy are still highly negative, but they see a rosier future - especially after hearing how the economy is recovering every time the turn on the TV or open a newspaper. Surprisingly after being bombarded (perhaps brainwashed is a better term) with news about an improving economy, more survey respondents when questioned whether they thought the economy was going to get better said yes. To put the 54.1 number in context, the average number over time is 95. A robust economy has a number well over 100, so we are about at half that level.

According to Case-Shiller, U.S. housing prices have now gone up two months in a row - May and June. This got huge coverage in the mainstream media yesterday. Did this actually happen? Well, not exactly, if you're a stickler for details. The Case-Shiller numbers are not seasonally adjusted and late spring is usually the strongest part of the year for home sales. If you seasonally adjust the numbers, it turns out May was actually negative. June was still positive, but you would need a magnifying glass to see the number it was so small. Suppose you adjusted the numbers for the $8000 tax credit the federal government was giving first time buyers? Well, the June number would sort of be negative too. What about year over year numbers? Well for the entire U.S. they're down 15%. From the peak there has been a 30% drop so far. The 20-city index, which is the one that was up in May and June has fallen 45.3% since the 2006 top. Yeah, those numbers really scream recovery.

The underpinnings for a housing recovery are also just not there. Colonial BancGroup just filed for bankruptcy. It was closed down by the FDIC about two weeks ago and was the sixth largest failure in U.S. bank history. A lot of bad mortgages did it in. The bank is under criminal investigation for accounting irregularities (you should wonder how many other banks may have engaged in similar behavior, but have not yet been found out). Bank of New York is its biggest creditor. Yes, the big banks have exposure to these medium and small banks. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp., one of the largest independent mortgage companies in the U.S. was also forced into bankruptcy as well because it relied on Colonial for its funding. Bank failures can have a lot of collateral damage. So far this year we are at 81 and counting. Despite the 'resurgent' economy and 'bottomed' real estate market, I have a feeling there's going to be a lot more.

NEXT: Enron Accounting and GDP; FDIC's Money Shortage

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke Reappointed, Court Order and FDIC

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke is going to be reappointed for another 4 year term. Obama decided to reappoint Bernanke because he wanted to keep together the team that had weathered the Credit Crisis, an administration official said. This is of course like reappointing the team that did such a 'good job' handling Hurricane Katrina. Just as Bush praised those incompetents, 'change you can believe in' Obama praised Bernanke for preventing another depression. Bernanke was first appointed by Bush and didn't foresee the Credit Crisis coming, nor did he respond appropriately once it did. There is of course also no evidence that another depression has been prevented . So far, it is just some fantasy that politicians inside the Beltway keep repeating to each other.

In other Fed related news, a federal court in New York has ordered the Fed make available information from 11 of its Credit Crisis programs to the public. The court ruled that the Fed improperly withheld records under the Freedom of Information law. Bloomberg News sued (kudos to them) and is trying to find out how much money was given to which banks. In its defense of the case, the Fed (which I would like to remind you is only a quasi-governmental entity - the big banks own stock in it and have their representatives sit on the Fed's regional board of directors) essentially maintained that it was above the law. Undermining our democratic system - just another example of the 'good job' that Ben Bernanke has been doing.

The FDIC is also in the news again. For some reason, even though the Credit Crisis is supposedly over and the economy is recovering U.S. bank failures are skyrocketing. The agency needs new bidders for failed banks because existing banks are now avoiding purchasing them. The FDIC's deposit insurance funds are also getting depleted. The FDIC is proposing a rule change that will allow private equity firms to buy failed banks and maintain capital ratios of 10% instead of 15%. This will of course make the failed banks likely to fail again - and I bet the private equity firms will scream for a government bailout when this happens. Indy Mac and Bank United were already sold to private equity firms earlier this year. Based on this news, we can presume that the FDIC is not using the Bernanke approach of threatening to fire any bank president that doesn't agree to the government's proposed takeover demands, as happened with Bank America. Since these banks are NOT too big to fail, they are not being directly nationalized as was AIG or indirectly nationalized as was the case with most of the big U.S. commercial banks and brokers. Undermining our capitalist system - just another example of the 'good job' that Ben Bernanke has done.

The biggest danger in any crisis is leadership that is oblivious and is in denial. The crisis only gets worse under such circumstances. Bernanke has been a disaster as a federal reserve chair by any criteria that you wish to measure his tenure by. Obama is not only totally ignorant of basic economics and devoid of any ideas for handling our current situation, but is even oblivious to what the current situation is. His actions remind me of Herbert Hoover's famous June 1930 press conference stating the Depression was over. Hoover was more than a decade early.

NEXT: Consumer Confidence Game and Housing's False Bottom

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Making a Silk Purse Out of a Sow's Ear

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. Treasury revealed its latest plan to rescue the collapsing financial system today. I have lost count of which number rescue initiative this is since there have been so many in the last year and a half. The need for a another new plan indicates the lack of success of all the previous plans that were supposed to fix things. Despite spending trillions of dollars so far, the government has not managed to get control of the problem - and for good reason. Essentially, all the government programs are geared toward making worthless assets worth something. If this is the goal, Harry Potter should be running the Treasury department instead of Timothy Geithner.

The latest idea is to take $75 to $100 billion (multiply this number many times) from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, aka TARP, and combine this with capital from private investors to buy up the toxic assets that are owned by the banks. Treasury claims that private investors participating in the new program could lose their entire investment in some cases and the taxpayer could share in profits (my guess is the chances of either are minuscule). The FDIC, which is close to being insolvent itself, will provide a guarantee for this public-private investment funding. It was not mentioned how the FDIC would be bailed out if any significant amount of these asset purchases went bad.

Under the Treasury plan, private-sector participants will compete to establish a price. Treasury claims that the public-private partnership is superior to a "bad bank" approach because because under the "bad bank" approach taxpayers would take on all the risk, and government could overpay for the assets (as if these two things aren't happening in their alternative approach). Treasury said that it expected a "broad array" of investors to participate in the program, including insurance firms (even though this industry itself is about to need a bailout - participating in this program should help push it over the edge). Treasury also claims that its new plan is designed "to make the most of taxpayer resources." This of course begs the question: What were the previous plans designed to do?

The ultimate goal of the latest, greatest, newest, improved government financial rescue package is to get banks lending again. As with all the other failed rescue packages, this is being done indirectly by attempting to solve some related issue and presuming that this will somehow magically jump start lending (the cause effect connection between the two is usually missing). The new plan is trying to restart trading in 'legacy securities'. The market itself has valued these as worthless and indicated that these are inherently non-viable financial instruments. Nevertheless, the government thinks it knows more than the market and insists on pouring more and more money into this financial black hole. Even though every previous attempt has failed, it is always hopeful that the next one will work. As I have said many time, nothing succeeds like failure in Washington. Where is Harry Potter when we need him?

NEXT: Print Enough Money, Everything Goes Up

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Citi That Should be Put to Sleep

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

A constant refrain that has been heard from the New York Investing meetup since the Credit Crisis began is "there is no such thing as one bailout for an insolvent financial institution". If there was a poster for credit crisis relief, Citibank's picture would be on it with words underneath, "Can you bail me out? We accept funds from Arab sheiks, sovereign wealth funds, foreign banks, the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, and any welfare program for banks the government can invent - and we take food stamps". As with the daily crashes in the stock market,the bailouts for Citibank have become so common it's easy to lose track of them. From the end of 2007 into the spring of 2008 there were five different bailouts five months in a row. The Fed has pumped substantial amounts into the bank through its various lending facilities. Citi got the biggest chunk of funds from the TARP bill just recently. The 'success' of these efforts came to fruition last week when Citi (C) stock went into a death spiral losing 60% of its value to close at $3.77 (it was over $55 last year).

But not to worry, the U.S. government brain trust that has come up with one ineffective failed program after another to handle the credit crisis put together a bailout package for Citi over the weekend. If they are lucky, this one will work for more than just weeks, but will stabilize things for months before the next rescue package is needed (consider this to be the optimistic scenario). Citi will get another immediate cash infusion of $20 billion from TARP funds. Treasury and the FDIC will guarantee against the "possibility of unusually large losses" on up to $306 billion of risky (a code word for worthless) loans and securities backed by residential and commercial mortgages (please note that commercial mortgages are now collapsing). Citi will assume the first $29 billion in losses on this risky pool of assets. Beyond that amount, the government would absorb 90 percent of the remaining losses, and Citi 10 percent. Money from TARP and funds from the FDIC would cover the government's portion of potential losses (this is deposit insurance money). The Federal Reserve would finance the remaining assets with a loan to Citigroup of freshly printed dollars.

So that this bailout doesn't look like the handout that it is, the U.S. government is getting $7 billion in preferred shares of Citigroup. In addition, Citi will issue warrants to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC for approximately 254 million shares of the company's common stock (4.5% of the total) at a strike price of $10.61. It is of course possible the Citi stock could hit this level, especially if the U.S. government provides at least $10.61 of funding per share. Citigroup is also barred from paying quarterly dividends to shareholders of more than 1 cent a share for three years (it makes no sense that it should be allowed to pay any dividends, since they are being funded by the U.S. taxpayer). Citi has to additionally take steps to help distressed homeowners.

New York Investing has repeatedly said in its talks in the last year that Citi is too big to fail and the government will bail it out no matter how big a financial black hole it is. This sentiment was echoed in press coverage of the most recent bailout effort with financial commentators saying things such as"If they didn't help, the damage would be beyond imagination" and "It would create chaos [if there hadn't been a bailout]". We have also discussed how Japan followed similar policies with it banks in the 1990s and 2000s. During that time, the Japanese economy has been unable to recover and the stock market has sold off for 18 years. U.S. policy makers will have to come up with a different approach than the one used by the Japanese if they want to avoid this scenario in the U.S. So far, they haven't.

NEXT: Geithner's Appointment to Treasury, A Golden Opportunity

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The House of Cards Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Housing continues to deteriorate. There are now 12 million homes in the U.S. with mortgages that exceed their value. This pool of houses which is particularly vulnerable to abandonment and foreclosure represents almost a quarter of all mortgaged residential properties . By the end of 2008, it is estimated that there will be a million bank owned properties for sale, which would represent a third of homes on the market. The situation is already much worse in trend leader California, where over 50% of existing home sales were foreclosed properties last month. Median prices there have dropped 34% from the high so far. The rest of the U.S. could follow California, although increased government efforts to prop up the housing market are trying to prevent further erosion.

Last quarter 766,000 U.S. home owners received at least one foreclosure notice. Only six states accounted for a majority of foreclosure activity - Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, and Ohio. The last four of these states are battlegrounds in the presidential election and Arizona would be too if McCain didn't represent it in the senate (nevertheless McCain's lead in the polls there is surprisingly small even though Arizona is one of the states most likely to support a Republican candidate for president). Foreclosures were worse in the beginning of the quarter and the rate even declined by 12% in September. While it looks like the number of foreclosure notices will be lower in the future, this won't be taking place because of improvements in the housing market.

The rate is being lowered by new laws have been enacted in a number of states to delay the repossession process and the FHA is attempting to renegotiate loan terms for a number of mortgage holders at risk. Foreclosure statistics are indeed very much affected by the ease of foreclosure which varies by state and should not be considered as an absolute indication of the strength of a state's housing market. New York for instance currently has a low foreclosure rate because it is necessary to go to court first and this means a foreclosure can take well over a year, longer if the judge doesn't wish to be cooperative. The FDIC is also trying to delay or prevent foreclosures. The first thing they did when they took over IndyMac was to stop all foreclosures and they are continuing to do so.

Delay does not mean preventing the inevitable however, it usually only means it only takes more time to get there. U.S. housing was in a bubble and prices became way extended on the upside. They are going to have to come down at least to the long-term mean - and we still have a long way to go to get there - before a sustainable recovery in real estate is possible. This will be an important precondition to a healthy economy as well. A look at the past suggests this linkage. Housing prices fell approximately 50% nationally in the U.S. between 1930 and 1940. The economy wasn't in such great shape then either.

NEXT: Black Friday Panic Grips World Markets

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

No Assurance in Insurance; Wachovia's Deal is Not a Deal

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Apparently you can't rely on anything that U.S. government officials say, whether it comes from politicians or federal agencies. As is the case for those with severe psychological disturbances, reality has no permanence, but can change from moment to moment. Today's illustration of this 'Washington psychosis' comes from the Democratic leader of the Senate, Harry Reid, and the FDIC, the people who are supposed to be protecting your bank deposits. Reid publicly stated that a major insurance company was about to go under and then later backtracked (apparently the amnesia drugs had kicked in by that time). The FDIC announced on September 29th that Wachovia had been purchased by Citibank and provided detailed terms of the transaction. This morning, Wells Fargo announced that it was taking over Wachovia in an all stock deal. This leads to the immediate question of who paid whom a bigger bribe to make this happen.

Reid's statement was, " We don't have a lot of leeway on time. One of the individuals in the caucus today talked about a major insurance company. A major insurance company -one with a name that everyone knows that's on the verge of going bankrupt". Insurance stocks were already down before this comment because of exposure to AIG, Lehman, and Washington Mutual debt, not to mention derivatives. The selling accelerated after Reid spoke. In a very carefully worded statement (note the italics), a spokesman for Reid later stated, "Senator Reid is not personally aware of any particular company being on the verge of bankruptcy. He has no special knowledge about [a bankruptcy], nor has he talked to any insurance company officials." There were four insurance companies, which might be considered household names, that had double digit sell offs on Thursday - Hartford Financial Services (down 32%), MetLife (down 15%), Prudential (down 11%), and Lowes (down 10%). Both Met Life and Hartford released statements that they were not on the verge of bankruptcy (one wonders why they felt a need to do so).

Below is all the U.S. listed insurance companies with a market cap over one billion that had 10% or greater sell offs on Thursday:

Hartford Financial Services (HIG) - down 32%
Principal Financial Group (PFG) - down 16%
MetLife (MET)- down 15%
AXA (AXA) - down 12%
State Auto Financial Corp (STFC) - down 12%
Delphi Financial Corp (DFG) - down 12%
Prudential Financial (PRU) - down 11%
Unitrin (UTR) - down 11%
Everest Real Estate Group (RE) - down 11%
Loews (L) - down 10%
Cincinnati Financial Corp (CINF) - down 10%

The Reid insurance bankruptcy comments were just a moment of truth accidentally slipping out. The takeover of Wachovia by Wells Fargo after there was a done deal with Citibank is far more serious however. This represents a fracturing of the capitalist system in the U.S. Such niceties as contract and property rights no longer seem to be necessary, as indeed is the case in backward, undeveloped economies (which remain backward and undeveloped because these underpinnings for successfully doing business are missing). Of course, things may not actually that bad. This could merely be a case of the FDIC publishing completely false information about its activities and what is going on in the banking system. Well, that's certainly a reassuring thought.

NEXT: The House Caves in, but it's the Market that Collapses

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Short Selling Democracy - Senate Ressurects Bailout Bill

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Videos Related to this Blog:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2f4XUpVINs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQieE8Ryvk0

Late on Wednesday evening the Senate passed their own version of the Wall Street rescue package by a margin of 74 to 25 . Unlike the House the Representatives where all of the members are up for election this year, only a third of U.S. senators have to face the voters next month. It was therefore easier for them to ignore an irate populace opposed to this legislation and instead follow the lead of their major campaign donors who have paid them the big bucks for their assistance in looting the U.S. treasury.

In order to make the bill more sellable, a small bone or two was thrown to the little guy. A number of tax breaks amounting to a few cents for the populace for every dollar for Wall Street were thrown in to the mix to help buy off some key congressional votes in the house. The provisions have nothing to do with fixing the financial system of course. They include disaster aid for Texas, Louisiana and the Midwest (as if congress wouldn't vote for this otherwise), aid for rural school programs, and tax breaks for people who live in states without state income taxes. Some fixing of the AMT (alternative minium tax), keeping it from affecting several million middle income earners, was also thrown into the bill. Many of the House members that voted against the bailout bill the first time would like these provisions. Only a little over a dozen or so need to change their votes. If they are willing to do so for a few cents on the dollar, their votes obviously come pretty cheap.

Also added to the Senate bill was a provision to raise FDIC insurance on bank deposits to $250,000 per person (already the limit for IRAs in banks). While this may be a good idea, this provision could wind up to be extremely costly to the government. Bank failures will eventually drain the FDIC insurance fund (this would have happened already because of the failures of Washington Mutual and Wachovia, but the banks taking them over are paying off the funds the FDIC would have had to pay, then writing off an equivalent amount of bad loans, and will be reimbursed by that amount through the bailout plan). The government is going to wind up paying $250,000 per account for a large number of depositors of failed banks one way or the other in the future (instead of $100,000). Needless to say, the senate bill doesn't assume these future costs will exist.

The Senate bill is just another confirmation that our representatives in Washington see no limits whatsoever are needed on government spending. They take a break-the-bank expenditure bill and try to pass it be adding more expenditures (the likely amount not adequately reflected in the proposed costs). While the U.S. is not the first government in history to engage in such profligate behavior, the powers that be seem to think it can be the first in history to avoid destructive inflation or even hyperinflation as a consequence of doing so. Just in case reality rears its ugly head at some point, you just might want to pick up some gold and silver.

NEXT: No Assurance in Insurance; Wachovia's Deal is Not a Deal

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Three Bank Monty - Monday's Global Bank Failures

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The nationalization of the world's banking systems took a big step forward on Monday, with major bank failures happening in the U.S., England, and the European continent. In all cases, the respective governments are getting a piece of the action. While it is generally acknowledged that socializing anything will lead to inefficient operations, general dysfunctionality, and substandard practices, apparently the governments of a number of developed economies have decided that socialized banking is an important component of the solution to the current economic crisis. These are of course the same geniuses that created the government policies that allowed the current economic crisis to take place and then remained completely oblivious to them as they unfolded.

In the U.S., Wachovia now no longer exists. Only last week it was the fourth largest American bank. Over the weekend the FDIC 'facilitated' troubled financial giant Citigroup's purchase of Wachovia's banking operations. Wachovia's own demise can be traced back to its takeover of mortgage lender Golden West Financial in 2006. Citigroup is supposed to be absorbing $42 billion in Wachovia's losses, but this will not happen if the banking bailout plan passes because the bill states that the taxpayers pick up the tab in such circumstances. The FDIC is supposed to cover any remaining losses and in exchange for doing so will get $12 billion in preferred stock. Nevertheless, in a statement that seems to lack both truth and consistency, the FDIC said that the Wachovia bailout won't cost its deposit insurance fund anything. Even though Wachovia's stock fell to 91 cents in Monday's before the bell trading (under one dollar is the market's statement that a company is insolvent), the FDIC claimed the Wachovia did not fail. If you believe that, you are also likely to believe that a pile of manure is a mountain or roses. Wachovia is indeed the largest bank failure in U.S. history (at least for now).

While Wachovia was collapsing in the U.S., the Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxenbourg and the Netherlands) had to bailout Fortis NV with a $16.4 billion cash infusion. In return, the three governments will get a 49% stake in the bank. The demise of Fortis should be seen as a derivative implosion similar to that which brought down U.S. insurance giant AIG. Fortis has had to write down its credit default swaps (CDOs) by 78% so far and this essentially made it insolvent. As was the case for Wachovia, the downward spiral for Fortis was also caused by it taking over a financial company with a dicey lending book. Fortis was part of a three bank consortium that purchased ABN Ambro in October 2007 (long after the credit crisis was front page news). The lead bank in that consortium, Royal Bank of Scotland, is on New York Investing's likely to fail bank list and its stock was down 11% in early Monday trading.

England doesn't have to wait for a future bank failure however. The British government on Monday was forced to nationalize Bradford and Bingley, taking over its $91 billion mortgage operation. The Brits also paid Spain's Banc Santander $33 billion to 'facilitate' its purchase of Bradford and Bingley's savings business. Bradford and Bingley specialized in mortgages for rental properties and it was reported that there had been no income verification for at least 17% of its loans. This was the second bank nationalization in England, Northern Rock was the first, and followed the government arranged purchase of HBOS Plc by Lloyds TSB Group only nine days ago. It is quite obvious that it will not be the last either. Total mortgage lending in Great Britain has fallen 95% (yes 95%) in the previous month. A credit collapse of this magnitude makes the dislocations of the 1930s Great Depression pale in comparison.

NEXT: A Bridge Loan to Nowhere - The Wall Street Bailout Plan

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

This Week's Largest Bank Failure in U.S. History

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our videos related to this posting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfpE0wAz-nA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIxTlP5FU_Q

Last night, Washington Mutual became the biggest bank failure in American history when it was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision (its $307 billion in assets dwarfs the previous record holder, Continental Illinois, which had only $40 billion in assets) . The FDIC was immediately named as receiver and it just as immediately sold Washington Mutual to JP Morgan Chase. The only surprise in Washington Mutual's failure was that it took place on a Thursday instead of the usual bank seizure day Friday (the situation must have really been desperate), although based on news reports, the CEO seemed to have been unaware that it was going to happen. There was a major surprise however in that the FDIC claimed that it will not have to pay any money out of its deposit insurance fund because of the failure (this doesn't mean that the money isn't going to be paid, see below for some insight into the latest scam that the U.S. government seems to have going).

The New York Investing meetup first predicted Washington Mutual would go under last April and again in our September meeting (it was amazing it was still operating at that time). Its impending failure was an open secret in the last few weeks. A slow run on the bank followed, with $16.7 billion (or approximately 12%) of deposits being withdrawn since September 15th. While filings indicate that Washington Mutual had $143 billion in deposits at the end of August and deposits were likely dropping in the first 15 days of September as well as after, the government stated in its takeover press release that Washington Mutual had $188 billion in deposits (interesting arithmetic, but typical of the U.S. government).

Washington Mutual had all the major markers of a bank likely to go under - a huge drop in the stock price (down 95% from the high yesterday); option ARM and subprime lending (as much as half of its $227 billion in loans; massive losses ($3 billion in the last quarter alone) and write downs; a fired CEO; way above average interest rates to get deposits (5% for one-year CDs), and incidents of capital raising. Unlike other failure prone banks, Washington Mutual had only one major capital raising event because the terms granted private equity firm TPG made it impossible to raise additional funds. TPG agreed to rescind those terms a couple of weeks ago, but too late to save the $7 billion it funnelled into the doomed Savings and Loan last April (once again the 'smart' money doesn't seem so smart after all). There was even an additional augur of Washington Mutual's impending end that can not be reliably counted on - S&P downgraded it to junk status on September 15th and then again to even lower junk status on the 24th (with ratings as low as C, only one step above the minimum possible D, which means default). Kudos to S&P for finally downgrading a company before it went out of business.

As for the terms of JP Morgan's takeover, they are quite interesting to say the least. JP Morgan agreed to pay $1.9 billion for the acquisition (similar to the price it paid for Bear Stearns). It has no obligations to Washington Mutual's equity, senior, or subordinated debt holders, all of whom will be wiped out. It is going to have to take a $31 billion write down for Washington Mutual's bad loans however. This figure is approximately what the FDIC would have had to pay out of its deposit insurance fund because of Washington Mutual's failure. It is doubtful though that JP Morgan will really suffer the full cost of this write down. It not only has a major account with the Federal Reserve, but its CEO, Jamie Dimon, has a seat on the New York Fed's board and gets to vote on decisions that could be very helpful to his bank. Somehow, I think the Fed will make sure that JP Morgan is taken care of.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.