U.S. stocks rallied strongly on Friday because of the February employment report. In what could only be described as the latest episode of the emperor has no clothes or more appropriately the emperor's people have no jobs, the Dow Jones was up 122 points (1.2%), the S&P 500 up 16 points (1.4%), the Nasdaq up 34 points (1.5%) and the small-cap Russell 2000 up 14 points (2.1%). Oil rallied close to 2% and gold was flat on the day. Bonds sold off. One major media outlet after another trumpeted the reported loss of 36,000 jobs as good news in their Friday and weekend coverage, as did the politicos in Washington. Wall Street was jubilant.
The media clearly wants to tell the story of a recovering economy and will be doing so even if there isn't any evidence to back that viewpoint up. The story of course is coming directly from the U.S. government during a congressional election year. The government writes detailed press releases for each economic report and in those it presents the rosiest scenario possible. It is not going to go out of its way to point out any bad news, but spins the story to make our political leaders look good. Analyzing the numerous detailed and at times poorly laid out charts in the economic reports is a time consuming and difficult process, but is the only way to find out what is really going on. For those who are interested, the next time there is a major economic news release, look at the time stamp (the moment of publication) on the articles from the major news services. I have seen time stamps of 8:30AM for a news release that took place at 8:30AM. This is merely a reprint of the government's best of all possible worlds press release. This is the only news that most media outlets report.
Looking at the details and footnotes of February's employment report painted an ugly picture of the U.S. job situation. In addition to the 1.2 million census workers that seem to have been placed in the Business and Professional Services category over the last several months, instead of the Government category where they belong, the seasonal adjustments were substantial and made the headline numbers much better than the real numbers. The actual unemployment rate (known as U-3 in the report) was 10.4%, but this became the reported 9.7% through the magic of adjustment. The unemployment rate that takes into account forced part timers and some discouraged workers (known as U-6 in the report) was actually 17.9%, but this became a still whopping 16.8% for seasonal reasons. Does this sound like good news?
For those who want to see the numbers themselves, Table A-15 (yes, there are a lot of tables) of the February Non-Farm Payrolls report can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm.
The snowstorms in the East during February were specifically used to imply that the employment numbers were actually much better than they appeared. The BLS in its press release said it couldn't calculate their impact (as if it has never snowed in the United States previously). The spin coming from Wall Street was that there must have been huge job losses, which could have taken place in construction, and this meant the 36,000 job loss number would have been a gain otherwise. This is completely implausible. It could only have happened if there were a lot of workers that were going to be working during that time (there weren't, construction employment has fallen severely over the last two years) and couldn't because of the weather and that the numbers didn't already account for this problem through seasonal adjustments (they did). Furthermore, snow removal is frequently done by temporarily employed workers and this would have added substantially to the employment numbers, not subtracted from them. Moreover, it is unlikely anyone fell off the employment rolls as far as the government was concerned because of the snowstorms. Any regular worker who got paid for at least one-hour during the two-week survey period was considered to be employed.
Job losses in the U.S. have been a regular occurrence for the last couple of years. The only exception recently was in November 2009, when the numbers became positive because of after the fact adjustments. While job losses are bad, small job gains are also bad. The U.S. needs to create up to 200,000 additional jobs each year to employ people entering the labor force. Things will really have turned around when that happen and the jobs are from private industry and not the government. Wall Street's reaction to the February employment report indicates more than snow was being shoveled recently.
Disclosure: None
NEXT: Watch What China Does and Not What It Says
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment