It's a 50% Default for Greece

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

EU leaders have agreed to seek a 50% reduction in Greek debt from bondholders. This supersedes the 21% reduction decided on in July that was supposed to resolve Greece's financial problems. Apparently $30 billion will be given to the banks as an inducement for them going along with the plan. The EU and IMF will also give Greece an additional 100 billion euros in bailout aid.

While the announcement was delivered with a sense of finality, the first bailout of Greece in May 2010 was supposed to solve Greece's debt problems and so was the second bailout this July. It has only taken three months since the  "everything is really fixed now" July announcement before a much bigger bailout and debt writedown proved to be needed. Until fairly recently, EU officials have constantly denied that this would be necessary or that Greece would default. Not paying 50% of your bond debt is not only a default, but it's a major default.

EU officials still seemed mathematically confused about the situation in Greece. EU President Van Rompuy claimed that the current deal will reduce Greece's debt to GDP ratio to 120% by 2020. If so, Greece is still likely headed for more trouble. Since it is estimated that Greece's debt to GDP ratio is around 160%, it should fall to 80% if all bondholders took a 50% hit. Perhaps all bondholders will not be taking a reduction after all. Both the IMF and ECB hold large amounts of Greek government debt and have in the past been reluctant to accept any writedown of their investments.

The pre-dawn news for the EFSF (European Financial Stability Fund), which is supposed to receive 440 billion euros, is that it will be leveraged up to a trillion euros. The U.S. has been pressing for two trillion. This money can be spent to bail out all the EU banks hurt by the Greek default, but only if they can't raise additional capital in the open markets. So the debt problem will be solved by incurring additional debt and borrowing against it. If this isn't a financial system ticking time bomb, nothing is.

The unanswered question is what is going with happen to Portugal (the next most likely crisis), Ireland, Spain and Italy. EU officials tried to minimize the situation by saying Greece is a special case. It would have been more accurate to say that its problems were more extreme and urgent. They are not unique.  The other countries are already somewhere on the path to insolvency and this will have to be dealt with in the future. The only question is how soon that future will arrive. 

 Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Can the EU Solve Its Debt Crisis with More Debt?

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

European and U.S. stocks were rallying on Friday in what appears to be a liquidity frenzy supplied by the central banks. The market is once again hopeful now that EU leaders are beginning six days of meetings on how to save Greece and the euro. Based on their previous track record, which has led to the current crisis, there is little reason for long-term optimism.

Stock prices have not been the only thing rising lately.  Interest rates have been too in the credit- challenged Eurozone countries. While yields of Greek one-year governments have fallen back to only 180%, they were as high as 189% on October 19th. Greek two-years are at a more manageable 77%. Rates keep increasing in Greece despite the bailouts and this indicates the bailouts aren't nearly large enough and will have to continue and get bigger to keep the country out of default.  The political will for ongoing and ever-larger amounts of bailout money doesn't exist in the EU or does it?

While the EU voting public doesn't approve of spending more rescue money, the EU has created the EFSF (European Financial Stability Facility) — a 440 billion euro fund to help bail out its member countries that have debt problems and to bail out the banks that lent them the money that allowed them to have those debt problems. Much remains to be decided on how the EFSF will actually function. There is disagreement of how to use it to bail out failing banks for instance (this is currently being referred to as recapitalization since bank bailouts are also unpopular with voters). There is also a proposal to leverage EFSF funds up to five times, so there will be more than two trillion euros available. This idea is apparently a "helpful" suggestion made by the U.S. monetary authorities.

While the stock market is showing almost as much enthusiasm for the leveraged bailout proposal as it did for the great innovation of triple A rated subprime mortgages in the mid-2000s, such financial trickery ended badly the first time and is likely to fall apart even faster this time. Mainstream media coverage, at least in the U.S.,  rarely looks at where the money is coming from for the EFSF. Technically, the money is being borrowed. So in order to deal with a debt crisis that is wreaking havoc on the financial system because of too much risk, more money will be borrowed and then that money will be leveraged (a form of borrowing in and of itself) to magnify the risk of the new borrowing. If this appears not to make any sense at all, that's because it doesn't. When the default comes — and there is 100% chance that it will —  the end will be much, much worse.

A case can be made however that the EFSF money isn't really borrowed, but a form of money printing instead. If governments borrow without the ability to actually pay back the money without inflating their currency, they are printing money. EU countries are already highly indebted just like the United States (Japan is in even worse shape). The fact that there is a debt crisis in a number of Eurozone countries is confirmation that the level of debt is beyond the point of no return. So a more accurate portrayal of what is going on with the EFSF is that money will be printed, this counterfeit money will be leveraged by borrowing against it and this will solve the problem of too much debt. 

The world has already lived through a debt binge in the early 2000s. The current crisis centered in Europe is simply a continuation of the unraveling of that debt. Governments handled the first implosion with trillions of dollars of bailouts, by running trillions of dollars in budget deficits, and by printing trillions of dollars of money. Debt problems keep resurfacing however. Could it be that engaging in additional reckless and irresponsible financial behavior isn't a solution for reckless and irresponsible financial behavior? EU leaders may wish to ponder this before going forward. 

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wishful Thinking on Economy and Europe Driving Markets

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. stocks had a major rally on Columbus Day based on the French and German leaders' mystery plan to recapitalize EU banks and on raised forecasts for U.S. economic growth in the second half of 2011. While both news items seemed to contain nothing but wishful thinking, that's often enough for short-term traders.

The Dow Industrials closed up 3.0% and Nasdaq 3.5% on low trading volume. Big moves in the market are more likely when many traders are away and the people who want to move the market know this. Huge rallies under such circumstances are common in severe bear markets. Nasdaq  for instance went up 4.9% on Friday July 5th in 2002 when almost everyone was off on a four day weekend. The market then had an ugly selloff later in the month and an even bigger drop in September and October.

It shouldn't be surprising that "good" news on the economy appeared on Columbus Day. The timing had probably been carefully planned. Goldman Sachs and Macroeconomic Advisers raised their growth forecasts for third quarter U.S. growth to 2.5 percent from about 2 percent and this created the predictable cheerleading coverage from the mainstream media that the U.S. was avoiding a recession. While it is certainly possible that the government will report GDP growth of 2.5% in the 3rd quarter, this does not mean that the U.S. is avoiding a recession, or even that the U.S. isn't currently in a recession. The original GDP numbers at the beginning of the Great Recession weren't that bad either, but they have since been revised down.... again ... and again ... and again. This is how GDP reporting works in the United States. Good numbers are released when everyone is watching and the downward revisions, which can go on for years, are reported when no one is paying attention.

Adding juice to the rally was the news that the German and French had a plan to recapitalize the EU's crumbling banking system. No details of the plan were available however. The lack of information can mean only one of three things. The first possibility is that there is no plan at all or the details are so sketchy that releasing them would make it clear that nothing significant had occurred. Alternatively, there might be a plan that could work, but the chances of getting it approved by everyone involved are close to nil. Or there could be a plan that has a good chance of being approved, but wouldn't be very effective. Regardless, there was no good reason for a market rally from this "recapitalization you can believe in" piece of news.

The EU banking/debt crisis has no easy solutions and will have an ugly ending of some sort despite the mainstream media's constant stream of upbeat "things are getting better" articles. ECB president Trichet admitted today that the EU's debt crisis has become systemic and has moved from the smaller countries to the larger ones.  The rumors of a possible 60% haircut on Greek debt (reported by the Helicopter Economics Investing Guide on Monday and in the financial pages throughout the EU on Tuesday) may even be optimistic. When Luxembourg's Prime Minister Juncker was interviewed on Austrian TV late yesterday about the rumors of a 50% to 60% reduction in Greek debt having to be taken, he replied "we're talking about even more."

A credit crisis can have a devastating impact on the global economy as was made quite evident in 2008. While a case can be made that the monetary authorities have learned how to handle a credit crisis from their recent experience, they have less to work with than they did three years ago. Fed funds rates have already been close to zero for almost three years in the U.S. Quantitative easing has already been done twice in the U.S. and is on its second round in the UK, although it's already run into a glitch there. The BOE refused to buy gilts for the first time ever on Monday because they were too expensive. Maybe money printing isn't the panacea it's supposed to be after all. If not, the global financial system is in a lot of trouble.

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.