EU Debt Crisis Spreads Worldwide

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

As the situation in Greece deteriorates further, Moody's announced today that it intended to downgrade 114 European financial institutions and 17 global banks. Hopes that China will buy up   EU sovereign debt to help prop up the faltering eurozone may wind up costing the U.S. more than it does China. 

The hostility between Greece and the EU/IMF/ECB bailout troika is palpable. Nevertheless, there are claims that a deal should be reached by Monday. Whether the severe budget cuts demanded will actually be implemented is another story. Greece's GDP is shrinking 7% this year and additional budget cuts will only make the situation worse. Athens is already riot torn and elections in April (assuming a democratic government still exists) are not likely to produce a government favorable to the bailout terms. The market remains increasingly skeptical of Greece's near-term future with one-year government bond yields reaching 528% today.

While all attention is focused on Greece, the European debt crisis permeates the continent. Banks have lent too much money to not just Greece, but to Portugal, Spain, Italy and Eastern European countries as well. There is a still a hangover of pre-Credit Crisis debt that wasn't resolved in 2008, but merely papered over with newly printed money. Moody's just announced it was planning on downgrading 114 European financial entities including 7 in Germany, 9 in Great Britain, 10 in France and over 20 each in Spain and Italy. Global banks Nomura and Bank of America are in line for a one-notch downgrade, while Barclays, BNP Paribas, Credit Agricole, Deutsche Bank, HSBC Holdings and Goldman Sachs could have their ratings lowered two notches. UBS, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley could be reduced three notches.

China with its vast foreign reserve holdings has been considered the potential savior of the eurozone. If this does occur, it won't be only China that is paying however; the U.S. will be sacrificing as well. China has previously announced it wants to diversify its reserve holdings. Since a disproportionate amount of these are in U.S. treasuries, the obvious implication is that it will be funding less U.S. debt as it funds more EU debt. The most recent figures for November 2011 indicate that China decreased its U.S. debt security holdings by almost 3%.

The EU debt crisis is likely to be us for some time to come. The situation with Greece is not stable and at some point it will have to leave the eurozone. Attention will increasingly focus to the other debt-ridden countries and the weak banking system. Just as the crisis spread from Greece throughout Europe, it will then spread from Europe to the rest of the world. We are already seeing this happen.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wishful Thinking on Economy and Europe Driving Markets

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. stocks had a major rally on Columbus Day based on the French and German leaders' mystery plan to recapitalize EU banks and on raised forecasts for U.S. economic growth in the second half of 2011. While both news items seemed to contain nothing but wishful thinking, that's often enough for short-term traders.

The Dow Industrials closed up 3.0% and Nasdaq 3.5% on low trading volume. Big moves in the market are more likely when many traders are away and the people who want to move the market know this. Huge rallies under such circumstances are common in severe bear markets. Nasdaq  for instance went up 4.9% on Friday July 5th in 2002 when almost everyone was off on a four day weekend. The market then had an ugly selloff later in the month and an even bigger drop in September and October.

It shouldn't be surprising that "good" news on the economy appeared on Columbus Day. The timing had probably been carefully planned. Goldman Sachs and Macroeconomic Advisers raised their growth forecasts for third quarter U.S. growth to 2.5 percent from about 2 percent and this created the predictable cheerleading coverage from the mainstream media that the U.S. was avoiding a recession. While it is certainly possible that the government will report GDP growth of 2.5% in the 3rd quarter, this does not mean that the U.S. is avoiding a recession, or even that the U.S. isn't currently in a recession. The original GDP numbers at the beginning of the Great Recession weren't that bad either, but they have since been revised down.... again ... and again ... and again. This is how GDP reporting works in the United States. Good numbers are released when everyone is watching and the downward revisions, which can go on for years, are reported when no one is paying attention.

Adding juice to the rally was the news that the German and French had a plan to recapitalize the EU's crumbling banking system. No details of the plan were available however. The lack of information can mean only one of three things. The first possibility is that there is no plan at all or the details are so sketchy that releasing them would make it clear that nothing significant had occurred. Alternatively, there might be a plan that could work, but the chances of getting it approved by everyone involved are close to nil. Or there could be a plan that has a good chance of being approved, but wouldn't be very effective. Regardless, there was no good reason for a market rally from this "recapitalization you can believe in" piece of news.

The EU banking/debt crisis has no easy solutions and will have an ugly ending of some sort despite the mainstream media's constant stream of upbeat "things are getting better" articles. ECB president Trichet admitted today that the EU's debt crisis has become systemic and has moved from the smaller countries to the larger ones.  The rumors of a possible 60% haircut on Greek debt (reported by the Helicopter Economics Investing Guide on Monday and in the financial pages throughout the EU on Tuesday) may even be optimistic. When Luxembourg's Prime Minister Juncker was interviewed on Austrian TV late yesterday about the rumors of a 50% to 60% reduction in Greek debt having to be taken, he replied "we're talking about even more."

A credit crisis can have a devastating impact on the global economy as was made quite evident in 2008. While a case can be made that the monetary authorities have learned how to handle a credit crisis from their recent experience, they have less to work with than they did three years ago. Fed funds rates have already been close to zero for almost three years in the U.S. Quantitative easing has already been done twice in the U.S. and is on its second round in the UK, although it's already run into a glitch there. The BOE refused to buy gilts for the first time ever on Monday because they were too expensive. Maybe money printing isn't the panacea it's supposed to be after all. If not, the global financial system is in a lot of trouble.

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Foreclosure-Gate Scandal Widens

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


After the Obama administration has failed to take action in the foreclosure crisis, up to forty state's attorney generals are now planning to launch a joint investigation into a massive number of robo-perjuries committed by big U.S. banks. So far, partially government owned GMAC, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Litton Loan Servicing, a division of Goldman Sachs, have been implicated in 150 pre-trial depositions in a Florida court case. In these depositions, bank employees admitted to having provided sworn court testimony about documents they didn't read and wouldn't have understood even if they had read them.

The Florida case involves 3,000 homeowners facing foreclosure. The "foreclosure experts" who signed notarized court documents that were key elements of perhaps hundreds of thousands of foreclosures had formerly been hair stylists, factory workers, and Walmart floor workers. They were provided with no formal training. It seems that many of these "foreclosure experts" knew little about mortgages. Some of them couldn't even define the most basic terms related to their job. One exasperated robo-signer stated, "I don't know the ins and outs of the loan, I just sign documents". The signing being discussed involved notarized documents subject to the perjury statutes and something that most courts in the United States would blindly accept because it was provided by a major financial company. Apparently, some institutions don't feel they need to follow the law and the courts let them get away with it.

There is more than enough reasons to think that the same corrupt practices are taking place in consumer credit card cases throughout the United States.

Up to now, the Obama administration has opposed a national halt to foreclosures even though the epicenter of the scandal seems to be partially government owned GMAC. Federal officials claim that a moratorium would hurt the housing market and using incredibly twisted logic have stated that it would distract lenders from 'helping' borrowers that face foreclosure. The program they are alluding to, HAMP (Home Affordable Mortgage Program), is generally acknowledged to have been a significant failure. It is beyond amazing that something which could turn out to be the biggest organized fraud in the history of the United States doesn't seem to bother Obama and his people. Apparently, the federal government is one of those institutions that doesn't think that it needs to pay attention to the law either.

Other than the obvious political implications, the recent revelations could mean a lot of lawsuits are launched at every level of the home loan process. The holders of bonds consisting of securitized home loans could potentially be at risk with the value of these loans plummeting once again as happened during the Credit Crisis. It will probably be much harder to do another bailout this time around however.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

New Foreclosure Crisis Has Much Broader Implications

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to international economist Hernando De Soto, one of the key differences between an undeveloped economy and a developed one is clarity of ownership of real estate. The recently emerging foreclosure crisis in the United States indicates a movement toward the the third world model.

There is still a large overhang of U.S. properties with severe mortgage delinquencies and this problem is likely to continue for several more years. As early as three years ago however, problems with implementing the foreclosure process became evident. During the housing bubble, banks became sloppy and didn't properly transfer ownership papers when loans were securitized into bonds. The current owners of those bonds frequently can't produce the appropriate documents in foreclosures cases in the 23 states that require court action for a foreclosure. This led to the 'show me the note' movement after a federal judge ruled in 2007 that Deutsche Bank lacked standing in 14 foreclosure cases because it could not produce the relevant documents. A number of similar judicial rulings followed.

The banks have gotten around this problem by producing notarized affidavits from 'expert' witnesses who claim they have thoroughly reviewed a packet of documents related to an individual foreclosure and that they are valid and complete. One such 'expert' was Jeffrey Stephan, who has admitted under oath to having signed off on the documents for 10,000 foreclosure cases per month for the last five years. Mr. Stephan not only did this for GMAC (its parent Ally Financial is 56% owned by the U.S. government), but also for J.P. Morgan Chase and numerous other banks. This process is now being called robo-signing. It should be referred to as robo-perjury. While I am not a lawyer, it would seem to me that a number of other possible crimes might also be involved here as well, such as racketeering and criminal conspiracy Whatever criminal activity took place, a majority government owned enterprise participated in it. 

Readers should ask themselves if there is any reason to think that the big banks are acting any differently in their other consumer credit cases, such as defaults on credit cards.

The revelations from GMAC loan officer Stephan have caused a foreclosure moratorium to be put into effect by a number of lenders. The lenders were apparently shocked to find out that one person couldn't actually read and thoroughly review 10,000 legally dense document packets per month. Apparently none of the 'brilliant' members of the U.S. judiciary caught on either. Yes, it would certainly have taken a legal genius of Clarence Darrow's caliber to figure out that something that was impossible just couldn't happen. GMAC was the first to stop foreclosures in the 23 judicial states (those that require court cases for foreclosure). J.P. Morgan Chase followed. On October 8th, Bank of America suspended foreclosure activity in all 50 states.

Interestingly, the current administration is opposed to a foreclosure freeze. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, employees of J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs were three of the largest sources of funds for Obama's 2008 presidential bid. Only a cynic would think that this would have something to do with his administration's pro-bank view in the foreclosure crisis. Some might even claim that it looks like everything is being done to further the interests of a economic and political elite, just as happens in a corrupt third world country. If this were true, the banks won't be punished for flagrantly disregarding the rule of law, since it is only the little people that need to worry about such niceties.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Sell Off on Goldman News Has Deeper Roots

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The SEC's announcement on Friday (April 17th) that it was investigating Goldman Sachs on fraud charges seems to have been the cause of a serious market sell off, but other factors were at work as well. While major financial stocks took a hit, so did gold, gold miners, and oil. The tech heavy Nasdaq also had a sharp decline. The market was overbought and options expiration added an extra impetus to the volatility.  In such circumstances, any bad news can cause contagious selling.

While selling was broad based, large cap financials were indeed the epicenter of the damage. Goldman (GS) itself closed down 13% on the day. JP Morgan (JPM) was down 5% and Morgan Stanley (MS) down 6%. XLF, the financial ETF, was down 4.5%. Inexplicably, the gold mining index HUI was down 4.4% and gold and oil were each down over 2%. Gold should have seen safe haven investing flows, but did not.

As for the major market indices, the financial heavy S&P 500 had the biggest drop, falling 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down only 1.1% and the small cap Russell 2000 ended 1.3% lower. Nasdaq lost 1.4%. On the daily charts, the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 reached overbought territory in the middle of last week. Nasdaq became extremely overbought at the same time. If selling hadn't started on Friday, it would have done so probably at the beginning of this week.

Although the Dow has not gotten to overbought territory, it has other technical issues, namely volume or lack thereof. The Dow finally had a high volume trading day on Friday ... on heavy selling, which added even more weight to the technically negative picture. Overall volume on the Dow has been dropping since the bottom was put in last March, something that should not be taking place during a rally. Even worse, selling has been occurring on above average volume recently. This is known as distribution and indicates big money is getting out of the market. The only above average volume day so far in April was last Friday. The only high volume day in March also saw selling. February was more mixed, but the four highest volume days in January, all well above average, saw selling. 

Where the buying has been taken place in the market is also not encouraging. Only six stocks frequently account for up to 30% of the buying on the NYSE - Citigroup (C), AIG (AIG), Ambac (ABK), Bank of America (BAK), Popular (BPOP) and Fannie Mae (FNM). Considering that AIG and Fannie Mae are nationalized enterprises owned by the U.S. government and Ambac, Citigroup and Popular were penny stocks selling for 1.00 or less during the Credit Crisis, this is not exactly a sterling list of solid growth companies leading the market.

Liquidity is what makes markets go up (good earnings are the result of liquidity, although in the current rally, liberalized accounting standards may be even more important). The fed and other central banks throughout the world have pumped an almost unlimited amount of it into the world financial system since the Credit Crisis began. Too much liquidity over too long a period of time though pumps up stocks to unsustainable levels as happened in 1929, 1987 and 2000. Under such circumstances withdrawing even small amounts of liquidity can have the effect of sticking a pin in a very over inflated balloon.

Disclosure: Long oil.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Greece's Statistical Lies - Are the Numbers Any Better in the U.S.?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The only difference between Greece's blatant manipulation and falsification of its government statistics and what takes place in a number of other countries is that Greece got caught.

Greece's phony numbers have finally blown up in its face and this has led to the current crisis in the euro zone and an approximate 10% sell off in the euro since early December. There were obvious problems with the numbers from the earliest days when Greece joined the European currency union, but these were brushed aside. The economic and budget numbers aren't much more reliable in the U.S. and even though this is an open secret, it is also generally ignored.

The rules of the euro zone require a maximum annual budget deficit of 3% and a maximum debt to GDP ratio of 60%. Greece managed to 'hide' that its budget deficit was above the acceptable limit in the early 2000s by engaging in at least 12 currency swaps with Goldman Sachs between 1998 and 2001. Greece also seems to have done business with Credit Suisse. Italy, one small step behind Greece in the budget mess race, reportedly engaged in similar activity, but its business was first done with the infamous Long Term Capital Management. Goldman earned $4.95 billion last quarter and has been super-profitable in the aftermath of the 2008 Credit Crisis blowup (how exactly has it been earning all of that money?) The transactions with Greece were covered by RISK Magazine (an appropriately named platform to say the least) at the time. Even before the current brouhaha, there seems to have been a Wikipedia article on the subject. Not exactly a well-kept secret, but apparently the EU's central office wasn't exactly working day and night to ferret out the truth.

Currency swaps were just part of Greece's attempt to finagle its way around EU regulations. In 2004, it was revealed that Greece's budget didn't exactly reveal all of its expenditures. It turned out that it hadn't reported a large share of its military expenditures and this was used to reduce its budget deficit considerably. The EU decided the Greek budget deficit still met its criteria however. It didn't seem to occur to anyone that a government that was less than honest about one set of numbers would easily lie about another. For those who are unaware of it, the U.S. has funded its operations in Iraq and Afghanistan mostly through supplementary spending bills and this has kept the costs, estimated to be around a trillion dollars so far, out of the military budget.

More recently, Greece's problems with its reported budget deficit numbers occurred when it revised its 2009 deficit from 3.7% to 12.7%. The crack sleuths at EU central were not the ones to catch this rather gaping error. Greece elected a new government toward the end of 2009 and the correction to the blatantly ridiculous figures was politically motivated. The new government didn't want to wind up being blamed for the mess the previous government left behind. The 'excessive optimism' of the previous government was blamed for the discrepancy in the numbers. In January 2010, an EU report saw the situation differently and lambasted Greece for significant weakness related to data gathering, submission of incorrect data, disregard of accounting rules and a lack of timeliness of providing the numbers. U.S. government numbers also suffer from all of these problems.

U.S. budget figures don't look particularly good at the moment. There will be as much as a $1.6 trillion dollar deficit in fiscal year 2010, which ends on September 30th. The official national debt could easily reach $14 trillion by the end of the year, almost as much as the claimed GDP. The U.S. has a lot of potential off-balance sheet items however. These include obligations from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the FHA, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve. Together these obligations are potentially well over $10 trillion. At its current rate of spending, the FDIC is likely to run out of money before the end of 2010. Obligations for future social security and Medicare payments, which GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) would require a company to report, are somewhere between 50 to 100 trillion dollars. The U.S. government does not follow the rules that it insists are necessary for honest accounting from from its companies however.

The economic soundness of the state is not just dependent on government expenditures, but on the strength of a country's GDP. Only the most naive would assume that even though the budget numbers have been fudged, the GDP figures are honest. Once it exists, dishonesty motivated by self-interest tends to become pervasive in government reporting.

There are at least two major problems with U.S. GDP figures. First, there could be as much as $2 trillion, if not more, in illusory economic activity included in the calculations. Secondly, the numbers are adjusted for inflation, but the inflation numbers are grossly understated. This makes the final GDP number larger. Regardless of the sources of overstatement, the overstatement itself is obvious. The U.S. originally reported GDP numbers indicating close to a decent 3% growth rate in 2008, even though the economy was in the worst decline since the Great Depression (the numbers were subsequently revised down to a growth rate just above zero) . A declining economy means there should be a negative change in GDP. Where was the outrage from the economic community and the press when these impossible numbers were released? There was none. Just as in the case of Greece, the problems will not be generally acknowledged until there is some big blow up. Investors should stay tuned.

Disclosure: No positions.

NEXT: New York State Comptroller's Wall Street Bonus Update

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank Bankruptcy Bonanza

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

CIT filed for bankruptcy in New York on Sunday. This is the fourth biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history, just behind number three General Motors (Lehman Brothers was number one). The CIT bankruptcy filing followed nine bank failures on Friday, which coincidentally involved the 4th largest bank failure this year. The FDIC Insurance fund which pays off depositors of failed banks is itself bankrupt. CIT itself is a bank holding company and became one last year in order to TARP funds. It will not be countered as a failed bank since it is expected to come out of bankruptcy.

The amount of money the government put into CIT was a small $2.3 billion (compared to $45 billion put directly into Citibank). CIT was not deemed too big to fail. It has actually been on the verge of collapse for several months now and almost went under in July. Lots of parties have been holding it up, including Goldman Sachs, with temporary measures since then - and for good reason. CIT is the largest loan provider for small and medium sized business in the U.S and 300,000 retail outlets are at least partially dependent on it for their merchandise. Imagine the impact on the holiday shopping season (goods are already at the stores by this point) if CIT had failed in the summer? The U.S. economy would have taken a major hit since retailing is its largest industry.

The federal government's indifference to CIT puts the lie to Bernanke, Paulson and Geithner's claims that the TARP government bailout money was to restore lending and support the economy. The biggest U.S. lender to small and medium size businesses has been allowed to fail. Before the failure, its was drastically cutting its loans to try and stay afloat. CIT lent $11.3 billion in the first half of 2008, but only $4.4 billion in the first half of 2009. While this was taking place the large banks, who got copious amounts of TARP money to increase lending, were cutting consumer credit sharply. So the U.S. has moved toward an economy where only big businesses and the rich are supplied with adequate credit (a third-world model). There is no way an actual economic recovery can take place given this situation.

Of course the government will probably come up with a plan for the CIT post-bankruptcy. I imagine a Cash Loans for Clunker Businesses program where huge amounts of money are lent to insolvent subprime businesses that don't have a chance of every making any money (businesses with Washington connections will be at the top of the list and get 99% of the funding). Bernanke is probably starting up the printing presses right now to pay for it. Just as a reminder, Bernanke claims he and the other central bankers 'saved' the financial system last year and he has been heralded by Obama for preventing another depression. With 115 bank failures this year and counting, a major financial company bankruptcy, and an insolvent FDIC bank insurance fund, the financial system isn't looking so 'saved' lately. Well, at least we've got the stock market, which just had its best seven month performance since 1933 . Hey, wasn't that during the Great Depression?

NEXT: Markets Roller Coaster Ride Powered by Media Hype

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CFTC Kills Off DXO

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

DXO no longer exists. Deutsche Bank announced on September 1st that it would redeem all shares after the market closed on September 9th. DXO was started in June 2008 and had $600 million in assets. It was a investment vehicle that offered hundreds of thousands of small investors a leveraged oil play. Many members of the New York Investing meetup bought it in March and sold it in June of this year and made a 165% profit on this trade. We will not be able to do so again in the future.

The CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission) has been holding hearings this summer to investigate 'speculation' in the oil market. It has specifically targeted ETFs and ETNs in this regard. Deutsche Bank did not directly mention the CFTC in its announcement but said this redemption is the result of “limitations imposed by the exchange” causing a “regulatory event”. How much behind the scenes pressure was put on Deutsche Bank is not known. Deutsche Bank is a holder of U.S. mortgage debt. While it doesn't seem to be on the list of TARP recipients, it did receive approximately $11.8 billion from AIG as a result of the government's nationalization of the company. It can also be assumed that Deutsche Bank benefits from other Fed programs that take junky assets off bank's books and replaces them with higher quality bonds. When the government 'owns you', you are likely to give it what it wants.

It is interesting that the CFTC is concentrating its efforts on 'speculation' from investment entities that are used by small investors. Like the SEC, it hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the large players. For years there have been two large banks that have held large short positions in Silver futures (and Deutsche Bank may be one of those banks). It took years of complaints before the CFTC agreed to investigate, just as the SEC continually ignored complaints about Bernie Madoff and his obvious $65 billion Ponzi scheme. So far, the CFTC has found nothing, just as the SEC never at any point found any wrongdoing on Madoff's part (his Ponzi scheme collapsed on its own accord). If the federal government wanted to limit speculation in the commodities market it could easily have done so, by forcing Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to close down their commodity trading operations. Federal law prohibits banks from speculating in commodities and both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became banks in 2008. The government gave both firms a special five-year dispensation however. If you are a big player, you don't have to worry about 'the rules'.

The government's action in the energy market should be seen for what it is - an attempt at imposing price controls on oil and gas. Price controls never work and almost always lead to shortages and much higher prices. ETFs will not disappear either as a result of the CFTC's action, but will turn into closed-end funds. There will be an attempt to launch more of them. Each one will be smaller, less liquid and have a much higher expense ratio. More will move to overseas markets that are less restrictive. While it is just oil and gas this summer, expect other markets (particularly agricultural) to be affected in the future.

NEXT: The Cash From Clunk-Heads Program

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Government Sachs - Earnings and Market Manipulation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Goldman Sachs posted earnings today and it made $3.4 billion, or $4.93 a share, in the second quarter, up from $4.58 a share a year earlier. Wall Street's expectation were for $3.54. Excluding TARP expenses, the company would have had a profit of $5.71 a share. Revenue came in at $13.8 billion, way beyond the consensus estimates of $10.7 billion. The stock has been rallying big time the last few days. Certainly it couldn't have been because Wall Street insiders got the good news before it was publicly released. Even if they did and admitted in on a neon sign in Times Square, the SEC still wouldn't investigate.

In case you are wondering how Goldman makes all that money, there are two exposes available that can help clarify it for you. The first is "Inside the Great American Bubble Machine" by Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone Magazine, which details how Goldman has helped create and profit from every major bubble since the Great Depression. While I consider Taibbi's grasp of economics and market forces to be extremely weak and his article too much in a naive 'the speculator did it' genre, there are things that Goldman has done that are indeed questionable. Taibbi should have concentrated on them. For those who don't recall, it has previously been reported that Goldman shorted subprime bonds while advising its clients to buy them. It made money from client fees on one side and gains from trading against its clients on the other. What must it have been up to last quarter that made it so much money? It may not have been something so benign.

In a truly fascinating story that has gotten almost no media coverage (I wonder why), a former Goldman employee was accused of stealing proprietary software from the company that, according to prosecutors, could be used to manipulate the market in unfair ways if it 'fell into the wrong hands'. This description is from court proceedings. See the You Tube video before it gets censored: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrlQSMCx-aE

The accused former Goldman employee went to work for a group of former Citadel employees who set up their own company, Teza Technologies. Interestingly, Citadel is suing this new company for industrial espionage and this is related to the alleged theft of software from Goldman! “Defendants’ activities, particularly Teza’s decision to hire [xxxxxx], an accused software thief, create a substantial risk that they have stolen, or may be planning to steal, Citadel’s proprietary code,” the hedge fund firm said in court papers. Citadel, like a handful of other big Wall Street firms and hedge funds, also has a long history of making extremely high profits like Goldman Sachs and uses similar sophisticated software involved in the Goldman case. Thank god this software that could be used to 'manipulate the market in unfair ways' is in the hands of these fine upstanding corporate citizens - and we can be assured that the authorities plan on keeping it that way.

NEXT: So Much for No Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The U.S. Dollar, Gold and Oil

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The trade-weighted dollar was rallying this morning when European trading opened and gold, silver and oil fell in tandem. Actually it would be more accurate to say that two of its major components the Euro and British Pound were selling off (the Canadian Dollar and Yen were up slightly) after the European Parliament election over the weekend. The British Labour Party received only 15% of the vote and Gordon Brown is now in even greater danger of being ousted from his leadership (or lack thereof) position. Across the pond in Canada a significant quantity of gold, silver and other precious metals is unaccounted for at the Royal Canadian Mint. In the energy markets, the struggle between oil bulls and bears continues to heat up.

The dollar's rise is off of a key support level at 78.33. If you look at a chart of the dollar, you see a very clear head and shoulders topping pattern. The neckline is at 79. Once the dollar reached this level, news reports that would help it reverse its downward momentum started gushing forth from the press. Most can be traced directly to the U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve. The Fed even intimated that it would start raising interest rates in the fall based on a projection of economic recovery starting then. While there is somewhat less than a zero chance of an increase in Fed Fund rates that soon, the dollar nevertheless rallied on the news.

The Canadian Mint story is something that has received scant if any attention in the U.S. press. Unlike Fort Knox, where the U.S. keeps its gold supply, the Canadian Mint is audited regularly. It has been at least 55 years since Fort Knox has been audited. There have been only a handful of reported thefts by employees at the Mint in the last 25 or so years. Most revealing is the case of a worker that supposedly stole only 85 ounces of gold in 1996. A charge of theft against the man was dropped for unexplained reasons and the mint was spared the humiliation of a trial that would have explained how the man snuck the gold past metal detectors, surveillance cameras and electronic sensors. Perhaps similar things don't happen at Fort Knox, it's not possible to say. It is much more likely that there is less gold there than reported because the U.S. government has sold off more of its gold than it publicly admits. Without an audit, we will never know.

Light sweet crude was as high as 70.32 at the end of last week and closed at 68.44 on Friday. It was at 67.59 in mid-day European trading this morning. The price dropped sharply mid-week, but it strongly rebounded on a Goldman Sachs report that oil would rally to 85 by the end of the year (somehow I suspect that Goldman has a big long oil position). I read this as Goldman will be selling its oil at the Fibonacci retracement around 77. It needs to set a somewhat higher target to be able to get out at that price. Smart traders will follow Goldman's lead and close out their long positions around that price as well.

NEXT: Dollar and Gold, Power Struggle Continues

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Real Deflation is Taking Place in Bank Stocks

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

PPI came out this morning and the U.S. government is now claiming that there has been wholesale price deflation in 2008. At least this is what the headline number indicates. Core inflation wasn't as benign, rising the most since 1988. The media is of course now hyping the headline number, which it downplays when it indicates inflation and ignoring the core number which gets a lot of attention when it's the better number (the advantage of having two numbers, one is likely to look better). The prices that are really dropping are assets, not those that are consumer related, with bank stocks yesterday taking a real hit.

According to the BLS wholesale prices in the U.S. fell by 1.9 percent in December. The yearly drop of 0.9% compares with a rise of 6.2% in 2007. As has been pointed out repeatedly in this blog, recent drops in the PPI are due almost exclusively to declining energy prices. These led the price declines last month, with energy prices overall going down 9.3% and gasoline dropping by a record 25.7%. For a change, food prices also fell, or at least the reports indicates a 1. 5% drop for the month (there was no drop for 2008, nor have U.S. food prices fallen year over year in the last four decades). Core inflation told a very different story however. It was up 0.2% in December and 4.3% in 2008. The last time it was higher was 20 years ago.

Mainstream media reporting on the PPI, as has been the case recently, has indicated the risks of consumer price deflation because of the headline numbers. The media usually reassures the public that economists (almost all of whom missed the Credit Crisis, the recession and are usually wrong in almost all of their predictions) have "confidence that the Federal Reserve (which has totally and completely mishandled the Credit Crisis since its inception) has the tools needed to keep deflation from becoming a problem". The media usually follows this up with 'isn't it great that the Fed had the foresight to cut interest rates to zero'. Certainly, you can not argue that what the Fed is doing will keep the threat of deflation away. Central Bank monetary policies that have given rise to hyperinflation in the past are usually very effective in preventing prices from falling.

While there is no actual deflation going on in consumer prices as the mass media would have you believe, assets prices are indeed deflating (the two are not interchangeable) because of the collapsing financial system. That collapse is by no means done. Bank America actually hit a new yearly low in aftermarket trading yesterday. Citigroup fell over 20% into the 4's (its yearly low is just above 3, a price that large cap financial stocks trade at only if they are on the verge of oblivion). Wells Fargo was also down quite a bit. The charts for JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are not looking particularly healthy either. Even after the U.S. government has pumped almost an unlimited amount of money into these companies, they are faltering again. As we have said in the New York Investing meetup over and over, "there is no such thing as a single bailout for an insolvent financial institution". We'll just have to see what the government does next.

NEXT: Bank(rupt) of America Gets Government Bailout

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economic Predictions for 2009

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:


Last night in its December 4th meeting, the New York Investing meetup released its economic predictions for 2009. The talk began with a review of the 2008 predictions made at the Dec 12, 2007 meeting and published on the website that day (can be found in the file section in the file, "Japan 1992, U.S. 2007", see: http://investing.meetup.com/21/files). All the predictions made for 2008 were accurate at least to some degree, with the prediction of recession and and government bailouts for financial institutions being particularly spot on. If the 2009 predictions are equally accurate, it's going to be a very rough year.

It is our belief that the economy next year will descend from recession to depression (this is no official declaration for depressions as there is for recessions). As part of that scenario, unemployment is likely to rise toward and possibly into the double digits (depends on how much the government fudges the figures). Bankruptcies will increase dramatically, particularly for retailers, auto related companies (suppliers, dealers, etc.), home builders, and small businesses and individuals. Shrinking consumer credit and rising defaults on credits cards will continue to damage the economy. The real estate sector will not recover and the commercial component will suffer more than the residential. The bailout for banks and brokers will continue and additional money will be have to pumped into the failing institutions that have already received government money. Bailouts are likely to be needed for big players, like Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Bank America, and General Electric. Failures of small and medium banks will rise.

The U.S. government will react to this economic deterioration in 2009 by lowering interest rates even further, essentially instituting ZIRP (zero interest rate policy), and by ballooning the deficit and the national debt. Bailouts will expand beyond companies to states and municipalities. Some municipal bonds are likely to default if not propped up as well. The feds are going to have to support money market funds again next year, just as they have done twice so far in 2008. They may have to bail out the market system itself with the possibility of an exchange failing (there have been rumors of trouble at COMEX for some time now). In general, there will be some shift toward bailouts being focused on programs that help individuals rather than corporations, which received over 95% of bailout money in 2008.

Things don't look any better on the International front either. 2009 will be the year of global recession, with simultaneous recessions in the U.S., the Eurozone, Great Britain, Japan, Australia and a number of emerging economies. China will be in danger of political instability because of contraction in its manufacturing sector. Countries that export a lot to China, such as Japan and Korea and commodity producers such as Brazil will see damage to their own economics because of China's problems. In Europe, it looks like Great Britain will be the hardest hit of the major countries. Some smaller countries, such as the Ukraine, Hungary, Romania, Latvia and Estonia could see their economies implode just as happened in Iceland this fall. Overall, the rest of the world will react to the economic crisis by lowering interest rates and 'printing' large amounts of money just as we will be doing in the U.S.

While things look dire on a number of fronts, that doesn't mean there aren't many ways to make money in the current environment. People tend to focus too much on the risks in such scenarios, instead of the opportunities. The bigger the crisis, the bigger the opportunity should always be kept in mind. Winners always keep both in balance and keep an eye out for profitable investments when others are too worried or too fearful to do so.

The notes for the talk can be found at: http://investing.newyork.com/21/files in the file, "Economic Predictions for 2009".

NEXT: Brother, Can You Spare a Job?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Must Hold in Here

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The major U.S. stock indices hit five year lows yesterday. The Dow and the S&P 500 are now going to test their 2002 lows, also the 1998 low in the case of the Dow, around 7200 and 775 respectively (mentioned many times in this blog as the target price to look out for). Nasdaq is heading toward a support level in the 1250 to 1300 range, the shoulder area of the reverse head and shoulder pattern that it made in 2002 to 2003. Its stronger support is around 1100. This would be the next place to look for a market sell off to stop. The Dow, and even more likely the S&P, would be below their 2002 lows if this happened. The charts offer little guidance for any significant breaks of the 2002 lows, since there is no significant support until much, much lower levels.

Once again yesterday was a crash day, with all the major U.S. indices closing down 5% or more. I have lost count how many times this has happened in the last three months. The gains from last Thursday's mystery rally were completely dissipated in four trading days. The Dow held up the best with only a 5.1% drop, but closed at 7997, the first close below 8000 since 2003. Small caps were the hardest hit, with the Russell 2000 falling 7.9%. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq were in between with 6.1% and 6.5% drops respectively. Financial stocks had the biggest losses, with Citibank leading the way down with a 23% loss (the New York Investing meetup has been saying since fall of 2007 that Citi is insolvent and the market is now realizing it). Bank America, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs all had 10% or greater drops. GE, the next major bailout prospect, fell 10%. Autos of course were also hit hard, with GM falling 10% and Ford 25%. Ford barely remained above penny stock levels.

What is currently roiling the market, other than the usual unrelentingly bad economic news, was that the bailout prospects for the auto industry fell apart on Capitol Hill yesterday. Members of congress grilled the auto chieftains on their extravagant spending, including the private jet trips they took to the hearings. While there is certainly profligacy in auto company spending, it can't compare to Wall Street. The TARP legislation failed to eliminate multi-million (or even deca-million) bonuses given to Wall Street management, their high salaries, lavish executive perks as was revealed recently with AIG, nor the dividends they are paying to their shareholders with government bailout money. Suddenly Congress has discovered that taxpayer money shouldn't be wasted irresponsibly with auto companies (whose political contributions can't match Wall Street's). While overall this is certainly a good thing, the economic impact of all the major U.S. auto companies going into bankruptcy should not be underestimated. Market action yesterday made that very clear.

Having a policy of selective government bailouts is the worse of all choices. A government can bail out no company if it wants to maintain a free market system or it can bailout every company if it doesn't. The government certainly shouldn't do bailouts based on political favoritism. At hit or miss bailout policy also is likely to insure the least results for the most money spent -. something the U.S. government has proven particularly adept at in the last several years.

NEXT: Five Year Lows are Bad, Eleven Year Lows are Worse

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Dr. Evil and Mini Me Loot the U.S. Treasury

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

On Monday, U.S Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and his look-alike Interim Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability, Neel Kashkari (both originally from Goldman Sachs and participants in helping to create the credit crisis) came up with a plan to stabilize U.S banks without nationalizing them. The U.S. will be saved from socialism by pilfering its treasury and giving the money to the U.S. banks and brokers that are considered 'too big to fail' the many teetering regional banks will have to wait and if still in business, might get a share of the government's succor sometime in the future). Pilfering was their intent, along with helping out their other well-placed friends from the beginning (Kashkari drafted the Treasury department's three-page constitutionally questionable, unworkable, and politically inept power grab that was the original Wall Street bailout bill). Interestingly, every major American news outlet seems to have missed the real story about what is taking place.

The story universally reported by the U.S. media, frequently in blaring headlines, was that the government was going to distribute funds to banks in exchange for ownership stakes. No such thing is occurring. In reality, the Treasury is injecting liquidity by buying preferred stock. Preferred stock is loan in perpetuity, it does not represent any ownership rights in a company. Preferred stock is supposed to pay interest (if it doesn't, like all other permanent loans it's a gift). No interest rate was cited in the Treasury announcements, although anything less than the 10% that Warren Buffett got on his recently purchased preferred from Goldman Sachs (along with warrants) or Mitsubishi got on its purchase of Morgan Stanley preferred (backed by a U.S. guarantee), is a government subsidy. No major media source seems to have pointed this out. Instead, they all reported that if rescue plan works, the U.S. taxpayer will benefit because these preferred shares will be sold for a profit. Since preferred share prices fluctuate with interest rates and not the fortunes of a company (as long as it's a viable enterprise), they would go down, not up, if higher interest rates result from the government's inflationary policies. No common share price increases, as happens when a company does better, will benefit preferred share holders. It is of course almost 100% certain the government also overpaid substantially for this preferred stock as well (in the case of AIG, the U.S. government paid ten times the market price for the equity it purchased). The U.S. taxpayer is going to lose somewhere between a little and everything on this deal. There is no chance is will be profitable.

This looting of the treasury is also not going to be terribly effective either. With it, the government has officially established a 'too big to fail' policy. Only big banks intitally get any money. These include J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup., Wells Fargo, Bank of New York, State Street, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and JP Morgan will get $25 billion each (even though it doesn't appear that JP Morgan, nor Wells Fargo are in trouble and need the money). Another $25 billion will be split between Bank of America, and Merrill Lynch, which are merging. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley will each get $10 billion, while State Street Bank and Bank of New York (which also doesn't appear to need the money) will get roughly $3 billion each.

This latest move by the Treasury will not only help to continue to put another major dent in the U.S. government's stretched finances, but is helping to create a dangerous concentration of banking power. For 200 years, U.S. policy has promoted a large number of small banks, but now we will be getting a small number of large banks. The thinking behind America's historical approach to banking was to prevent the concentration of too much economic power in too few hands, which could threaten the capitalist and democratic systems. Based on what is happening now, these fears were obviously well justified.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.