Will Greek Bailout Deal Falter Now or Later?

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Greek bailout deal is once again falling apart. Whether or not it is patched together another time, the end will inevitably be an ugly default.

On Thursday, news sources around the world were trumpeting that the EU and Greece had come to terms that would allow Greece to receive a 130 billion euro bailout payment that would prevent the country from defaulting by March. But late in the day, EU finance ministers made additional demands on Greece. They wanted another 325 million euros in budget cuts, that the Greek parliament pass the cuts and that a written guarantee that the cuts will be still be implemented after the April elections. On one hand these demands are not surprising since the Greeks have been less than honest about their budget numbers in the past. On the other however, they are surprising because this could be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Greece is in its fifth year of recession and its economy seems to be in an unrelenting downward spiral. This is happening because just like the United States, Japan and a number of other nations, the economy is dependent on government spending made possible by huge budget deficits. Each time Greece has been forced to cut its budget deficit, the economy has shrunk some more. Additional cuts will only cause additional contraction. Although they receive little coverage by the U.S. media, riots have become common place in Greece (there is currently a 48-hour strike). Democracy might itself be threatened there. Greece does have a history of military dictatorship, with a military junta running the country between 1967 and 1974.

Lately, the country is becoming increasingly politically unstable. The far-right LAOS party, which is part of the governing coalition, has refused to support the new terms of the bailout. Its members resigned the coalition today. Even more disturbing, Reuters has reported that the Federation of Greek Police has issued the following statement to Greek officials: "Since you are continuing this destructive policy, we warn you that you cannot make us fight against our brothers. We refuse to stand against our parents, our brothers, our children or any citizen who protests and demands a change of policy. We warn you that as legal representatives of Greek policemen, we will issue arrest warrants for a series of legal violations ... such as blackmail, covertly abolishing or eroding democracy and national sovereignty."

Even if things are patched up once again and the next bailout payment is made, there will still be another one after that and even more to follow.  Greece is like the family that is only one paycheck away from homelessness, except one welfare check away from homelessness would be a more apt analogy. Eventually, something will give and this will have a major impact on the world financial system.

The real crisis in Europe is not Greece in and of itself, it is the stability of the banks in France and Germany that have lent money to Greece (and Italy, Spain and Portugal). These banks are in precarious shape and a Greek default will have similar consequences to Lehman's collapse in the fall of 2008. Expect the central bankers of the world to unleash a tsunami of money-printing liquidity into the system to stabilize it just as they did in 2008. They will be quicker this time around, so the collapse should be briefer. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Moody's Sovereign Debt Assurances Should Concern Investors

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to ratings agency Moody's, credit ratings of the world's four largest Aaa-rated sovereign nations - the U.S., UK, Germany and France - are currently "well positioned despite their stretched finances". The agency does however admit that risks have grown. Based on Moody's past actions, this should give investors little comfort.

In the current Greek debt crisis, Moody's was behind S&P and Fitch in downgrading Greek government debt. As reported in the Wall Street Journal, it took Moody's until December 23rd to make a downgrade of just one notch from A1 to A2. After the elections on October 4th, the Greek government admitted it had lied about its budget deficit and its ratio to GDP would be 12.7%, several times higher than previously reported. Even though the original numbers from the Greek government should have seemed unbelievably rosy, this apparently didn't make the rating's agencies suspicious. Are they likely to be more suspicious of the numbers generated by the politically powerful major countries that get their top ratings?

Prior to the Greek crisis, there was Iceland. According to the Central Bank of Iceland's website, Moody's downgraded Iceland's long-term debt obligations in domestic and foreign currency to A1 (still well within the investment grade range) on October 8, 2008. This was the same day that the Iceland's krona peg to the euro collapsed. Iceland had already nationalized major banks Glitnir and Landsbanki the month before. The Iceland prime minister had stated on October 6th that there had been a real danger of national bankruptcy. That scenario would have justified a rating of C from Moody's, many notches below the October 8th rating.

Investors should also not forget the role of the rating's agencies in giving securitized sub-prime loans top triple A ratings (Aaa in the case of Moody's). Moody's had to downgrade more than 5000 mortgage securities in 2007. The ratings agencies in general blamed mortgage holders that turned out to be 'deadbeats' and not their own practices. They would like us to believe that it was unreasonable for them to have assumed that people with spotty employment, a history of not paying their bills, and who bought houses they couldn't afford would default on their mortgages. If the rating agencies can ignore those problems, investors should ask themselves what problems they are ignoring with U.S., UK, German and French government financing?

How did the rating's agencies do with problem companies? Moody's downgraded Bear Stearns to Baa1 from A2 on March 14th, 2008. The Baa1 rating is an investment grade rating for Moody's (there are five speculative rating's below that level). That downgrade took place on the last day that Bear Stearns' stock traded. Moody's was still maintaining it was an investment quality company. The rating agencies did a little better with Enron, downgrading it to below investment grade four days before it declared bankruptcy. The stock had already lost almost all of its value before the downgrades, so the move was too little too late.

In its current analysis of sovereign finances, Moody's maintains that the major countries will be able to maintain fiscal stability because interest payments are reasonable compared to government revenues. However, government debts are increasing rapidly because of weak economies. If the global economy continues to stay weak, interest payments will go higher , tax receipts lower and debt will continue to pile up. Recovery, on the other hand, will raise interest rates substantially and this could overwhelm tax receipts and create a major debt spiral. The rating agencies are unlikely to consider that the major countries are caught in a lose/lose situation though since they seem to reserve their most speculative ratings for basic logic and common sense.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: The CFTC and Manipulation of the Silver Market

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Will EU Accept Greece's Trojan Horse of Debt?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


International markets are looking for resolution to the debt crisis in Greece. European Union leaders have a summit meeting on February 11th and either a debt restructuring or a bailout of some type is on the wish list of traders. Whatever happens however will only be at best a temporary solution that will delay the day of reckoning for the global financial system. In the short-term, it will not undo the damage done to the euro nor to the stocks and commodities that have been impacted by the currencies current drop.

The problem in Greece is neither new nor exceptional for the EU. The conditions of the currency union in the euro zone have been violated from day one. The Maastricht Treaty set a limit for budget deficits of 3% of GDP and a 60% limit for the debt to GDP ratio of participating countries. The euro was launched in 1999 and replaced individual country currencies in 2002. Germany itself, the economic powerhouse of Europe, had a budget deficit of at least 3.7% between 2002 and 2004. France also violated the treaty conditions within the first three years, as did Portugal. The Netherlands did so in 2003. Initially Greece appeared to be in compliance, but was later accused of manipulating its statistics (a historical commonplace for fiscally irresponsible governments) and later admitted that its budget deficit averaged 4.3% between 2000 and 2004.

The euro currency union actually helped countries reduce their budget deficits by lowering their borrowing costs. When the debt to GDP ratio becomes large, reducing interest payments can reduce the budget deficit considerably. This phenomenon benefited Italy tremendously. Interest rates on Italian government bonds fell from around 12% in 1994 to 4% in 2004. It also improved the situation in Belgium. Belgium's debt to GDP ratio was 134% in 1993, but only 90% in 2008. It has never gotten anywhere close to the 60% limit. Italy's debt to GDP ratio in 2008 was 106% and is growing rapidly. It will not be long before it reaches Greece's 120% level. Yet, the market is focused more on Portugal with an 85% ratio - equivalent to the official numbers in the United States (the actual numbers are similar to Greece's) and Spain which has only a 66% debt to GDP ratio.

The EU rules don't have any provisions for bailing out one of the members of the currency union. Such legal niceties though can easily be ignored during a crisis. The EU executive committee has furthermore previously maintained that no bailout of Greece will be needed. Mid-day on February 9th however, news was released stating that the euro zone countries have decided in principle to aid the debt-stricken country. Reports indicated that the EU authorities were considering a range of possible actions, but no specifics were given. The euro of course rallied strongly on the news.

The euro has traded down from a high around 1.51 to the U.S. dollar in late November to the 1.36 level on February 5th. It is trading well below its 200-day moving average at the 143 level. The 50-day moving average, also at the 143 level, is about to cross the 200-day and trade below it, giving a classic bear trading signal.  The euro will not be able to recover from this technical damage overnight. Nevertheless, sharp counter rallies are inevitable since short positions on the euro have reached a record. This will create conditions for a nice longer-term rally in the future, but a period of volatility is more likely first. Commodities, particularly the precious metals, and U.S. stocks tend to trade with the euro, so investors should expect them to follow this pattern as well.

Disclosure: No Positions

NEXT: Economists and Governments Pave the Way for Global Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Today's Economic Lunacy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If ever there was ever any doubt that lunatics are running the economic asylum, we received more than enough confirmation of it today. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke expressed confidence that the current recession (actually depression) could end in 2009. It has been revealed that much of the AIG bailout money went to pay other banks and brokers who were also receiving bailout money and for executive bonuses. OPEC caved into pressure from the West not to cut oil production because it would hurt the world economy, as if this could somehow undo all the damage the Central Bankers were doing.

Fed Chair Ben Bernanke made his remarks about the recession on 60 Minutes (they should have resurrected the 1960's classic show, 'The Twilight Zone', for his commentary). While media headlines this morning blared that Bernanke said the recession would be ending in 2009, he actually added the important caveat that this would only happen if the banking system is stabilized. A realistic assessment of the chances of that happening can not be found in most press coverage. Bernanke further stated (try not to laugh) the largest U.S. banks are solvent and "they are not going to fail". The large U.S. banks are of course insolvent, although it is true that they are not going to fail because the government will pump an infinite amount of money into them if necessary to prevent this from happening. U.S. taxpayers should not worry about this however. Bernanke assured us last night that the bailout aid is not coming directly from tax funds and is "more akin to printing money than it is borrowing." Isn't that the approach the Weimar Germany and Zimbabwe took?

Government money printing is bad enough as is, but the news out of AIG over the weekend shows just how much of this is going to waste (hey, don't worry, they can always print more... and they will). Of the $170 billion that AIG received in government bailout funds, $105 billion went to pay other banks, including many foreign banks. Many of the U.S. banks were already receiving other government bailout money as is. As for the foreign banks, why is the U.S. bailing them out? Adding insult to injury, AIG is also using its bailout money to also pay executive bonuses. It claims that it is legally obligated to do so. Personally, I would like to see those contracts that state government money must be used to pay these bonuses. I think this problem could easily be solved if the people running AIG spent some time with Bernie Madoff in his new home.

Since the ordinary rules of basic economics are being ignored everywhere else, why should they apply to oil production. At its meeting on Sunday, OPEC did not cut production quotas again, but instead said it would aim to enforce the already existing cuts. In the last several months OPEC has announced a 4.2 billion reduction in quotas and it is estimated there has been 80% compliance. They are now trying to get the extra 20% or 800,000 barrels a day. Oil production is being cut elsewhere as well, including the U.S., and this is happening because it simply isn't profitable to produce oil under $40 a barrel in many places. And no amount of wishing, hoping and jawboning is going to make this happen. The rules of economics always win in the end. Someone should tell Ben Bernanke.

The New York Investing meetup is having its second class in Technical Analysis on Tuesday. If you are in the New York area, you should be attending (space is limited and by invitation only to members of the group, if you didn't get an invitation email me through the website).

NEXT: When Bad News is Good News and Vice-a-Versa

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.