Showing posts with label real estate market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label real estate market. Show all posts

Monday, September 20, 2010

Is Too Much Liquidity Creating New Investment Bubbles?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Near month silver futures closed at a 30-year high on Friday and December gold futures hit another all-time high. Traders are looking for a breakout on the S&P 500 today as stocks have continued to rally throughout September. Liquidity is the driving force behind the market's move and it is unlikely the Fed will saying anything in this week's meeting that will indicate a reduction in its current massive pumping operation.

Unfortunately, it's not just the Fed that has the money spigot open full-force; the operation is global in nature. This evidence of this is that a number of government bonds of various maturities hit all-time high prices this summer. In a free market, this would normally be interpreted as an indication of an extreme economic weakness and deflation. While there is indeed significant evidence of slowing economies in a number of countries, particularly in the United States, purchases of government bonds can be influenced by central banks and treasury departments and can even be done by them as well. This can create significant distortions in the market. What is going on is that a lot of the excess liquidity is being used to buy bonds that then pay for day to day government operations.

Inflation sensitive gold is a much better arbiter of whether or not there is inflation or deflation. The gold market is not completely free of attempts at government influence of course, although there is far less of it than in the government bond markets. Gold is not only saying there is inflation, but that inflation is escalating. The U.S. Federal Reserve says otherwise. Of course, Fed officials also said that sub-prime loans wouldn't cause any serious problems in the financial markets. Yeah, you can really trust what the Fed says.

Outside the U.S, the European Financial Stability Facility, also known as Euro-TARP, is adding significantly  to financial market liquidity. The facility is currently valued at 440 billion euros. All three major rating agencies just gave it a triple A credit rating. Yes, these are the same rating agencies that gave securitized sub-prime loans triple A credit ratings. Certainly there was no reason to think that loans to people without jobs, without income, without assets and histories of defaulting on their debts were unlikely to be paid back. The same level of intelligence and insight was probably applied to the recent Euro-TARP rating.

The cause of the global real estate bubble was too much liquidity. We all know the ugly collapse that followed. Government officials have tried to reinflate the bubble, but reinflating a just collapsed bubble is not possible. This became quite apparent this summer when housing sales in the United States fell off a cliff. Creating new bubbles in bonds, commodities and stocks is possible however. Excess liquidity could cause all three. The collapse that would follow would be much worse that the recent Credit Crisis. Why are central bankers taking this risk?  Quite frankly, it's because they are just not as smart as the people who work for the rating agencies.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Monday, July 26, 2010

New Home Sales: Still at Depression Levels

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The June New Homes Sales figures were released today and the Commerce Department claimed they were up almost 24%. Stocks rallied strongly on the supposedly good news. A revision of May's all-time low number to a much worse all-time low number is what gave the appearance of a strong rebound.

New home sales for May were originally reported at a 300,000 annual rate last month. This compares to a high of around 1.4 million in 2005. It was also the lowest number ever recorded in the history of the data. As bad as 300,000 was, and it was truly awful, there was a significant downward revision for May sales in the current report to only 267,000.

May sales were also not the only month with a downward revision. The figures for April were originally reported as 504,000 in the report released in May. Then in the report released in June, they were revised lower to 446,000. Then in today's July report they were revised downward again to 422,000. Do we see a trend here?

The home buyer tax credit was good until the end of April. With the revised numbers, new home sales actually fell 37% in May, not the merely disastrous 33% originally reported. The drop from the originally reported April number was 47% however. If you wish to claim there was a 24% rebound for the numbers in June, as the government did, you need to put it in the context of a 47% drop first taking place, otherwise you are comparing apples to oranges. No matter how you look at it though, new home sales were and still are at depression levels.

New home sales figures have been continually revised downward for several months now. It is highly likely that the 330,000 number just reported for June will be revised lower next month and quite possibly lower again the month after that. The Commerce Department reports the best number possible the month of the release. The mainstream media then gives that news big attention and uses it to reinforce an image that government programs are being effective. When the downward revisions take place in future months and indicate things aren't quite so rosy, that news gets buried in the article - if it is mentioned at all. This is not the only U.S. government data where this pattern exists, nor does this only take place in this country. Investors shouldn't let themselves be tricked by this game.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.