July Jobs Report Shows U.S. Economic Statistics Are a Joke

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the Labor Department, the U.S. added 163,000 jobs in July. Also according to the Labor Department, the U.S. lost 195,000 jobs in July. So the U.S. economy is either doing OK or it's falling apart big time. Or maybe something between the two is happening. Confused? You should be.

Two separate surveys are used for the employment report. In one, they ask businesses about the amount of hiring they've done in the previous month and in the other the ask people whether or not they have a job. The amount of jobs created for the month is determined by the business survey and the unemployment rate from the survey of households. As more than one article on the July employment report pointed out today, "economists say the business survey is more reliable". So if you think you're unemployed, but an economist says you have a job, the economist is right.

The unemployment rate ticked up to 8.3% according to the household data.  The two surveys have frequently not seemed to match in the past with minimal job gains resulting in drops in the unemployment rate. The Labor Department explained that this occurred because millions of people have left the U.S. labor force since the "recovery" began in 2009 (150,000 more left in July). Even though these people are unemployed, they are not counted as unemployed and this makes the unemployment rate look better. Why millions of people would stop looking for work during a "recovery" has never been answered. Usually, this type of behavior takes place during depressions.

The Labor Department did not discuss the massive discrepancy between its two employment surveys in its press release. Instead it gave a rosy assessment of all the jobs created last month. This included 25,000 new jobs in manufacturing, even though the recent ISM Manufacturing report (a private survey) indicated U.S. manufacturing activity shrank last month.  So an industry that is losing business is hiring lots of new workers. That certainly makes a lot of sense all right.

One possible explanation for the discrepancy was that "inappropriate" statistical adjustments were made to the numbers in the business survey. While one should never rule out gross incompetence when discussing the output of the government statistical offices, a more cynical person might think that there was a purposeful effort to produce better numbers than actually exist because it's an election year. After all, those pesky downward revisions months later never get any notice from the press and the ugly truth can always be told later when no one is paying attention (and after they've voted).

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

March Consumer Confidence and the Housing Market

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Conference Board's March Consumer Confidence number came in at 70.2 this morning. As has been the case for the last four years, hope for a better tomorrow is holding the number up. It certainly wasn't the real estate market, which has been shown to be weak once again.

A healthy consumer confidence number is 90 or above. This number has not been this high at any point since the "recovery" began in mid-2009. It has instead ranged between a deep recession level in the 40's and a milder recession level in the 70s. What has caused repeated rises and falls in the number are changes in the Expectations sub-component. How people view current conditions has remained dismally low.

This is how it works. Consumers are bombarded with stories from the news media about how the economy is heading up and then they are asked if they think the economy will be better in six months. Not surprisingly, many answer yes and this causes overall consumer confidence to rise. As the months go on and they don't see any real improvement they become more pessimistic and they don't  think things will be better in six months and then the number falls. This scenario has played out multiple times in the last three years.

Expectations for a better future zoomed to 88.4 in February, but fell back somewhat to 83.0 in March.
The Present Situation Index, however, was a very poor 46.4 in February, but rose to 51.0 in March. While these numbers are not good, they are much better than some Present Situation numbers during the "recovery" year of 2011. Those were at depression levels. The worst number last year however wasn't the Present Situation one, but the Jobs Are Plentiful reading. This was statistically indistinguishable from zero at one point. Since negative numbers are not possible in the report, the reading has not gotten worse.

There have been two running news stories since the beginning of 2012 that have buoyed the consumer confidence numbers — an improving employment situation and a recovering housing market. Both of these may prove to be illusory. The hype about the real estate recovery is already starting to unravel. 

U.S. home prices dropped for the fifth month in a row in January according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index. They are now down 34.4% from their highs in July 2006. The National Association of Realtors has reported that existing home sales slipped 0.9 percent in February to an annual rate of 4.59 million units. As for pending contracts, a whopping 33% were canceled last month. While many have pointed out that home sales were much better in February 2012 than they were in February 2011, they usually neglect to mention that most of the U.S. was snowed in last February and this February was one of the warmest on record. The real recovery seems to have been one in the weather.

The sharp differences in weather from year to year can impact any economic statistic that is seasonally adjusted. The employment numbers are in this category. They may have been juiced up by a warmer winter as well. If so, U.S. consumers will start to become less hopeful about the future as they have before and the confidence numbers will start drifting down later this year.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

October Consumer Confidence Well Into Recession Territory

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The October Consumer Confidence number fell to 39.8. It is once again approaching the all-time lows that occurred at the bottom of the Great Recession. The number has never reached the 90 level since 2009, which is the cutoff for a healthy economy. The continually poor levels of consumer confidence  bring into question whether the last recession ever really ended.

While U.S. consumers are gloomy about almost all aspects of the economy, they are most pessimistic about employment prospects. Only 3% of U.S. consumers think that jobs are plentiful. While it is true that this number could have been lower during the 1930s Depression when millions of ordinary Americans went hungry and were homeless, the lowest possible value is only zero. And the current reading could actually be zero since zero lies within the statistical margin of error for the survey. In contrast, those who say jobs are hard to get came in at 47% and that would definitely had been much higher during the 1930s.

The Present Situation Index — how consumers see the state of the economy currently — was a very dismal 26.3 in October. This number has remained at fairly low levels for four years now. What has caused the overall consumer confidence  number to rise has been expectations for a future improvement in the economy. The government and mainstream media has continually told U.S. consumers the economy is getting better and will continue to get better. So, consumers have told the survey takers that don't see things as being in good shape now, but they were hopeful about the future. Consumers are starting to lose hope however. The future expectations number fell from 55.1 in September to 48.7. Apparently, you can only fool the public for so long.

The "don't believe what you see with your own eyes, but believe what the government tells you" efforts are still going strong however. Media reports cited better retail sales and a big stock market rally since early October as indications that the U.S. economic situation is improving. Retail sales may have indeed gone up since they are not adjusted for inflation and higher prices make them look better even if fewer units are being purchased. As for the wild behavior of the stock market, explosive rallies are common in bear markets and not in bull markets. They can also occur at any point because of liquidity injections into the financial system from central bankers in Europe, the UK, and the U.S. as would happen during a banking crisis like the one currently taking place in the EU. They don't last for long however.

No matter how you look at the consumer confidence, the numbers are ugly. They are not just indicating recession, they are shouting recession. Only 11% of Americans think that business conditions are good.  The Present Situations Index has dropped six months in a row. Some of the components are at rock bottom levels. Yet, the government and mainstream media keep reporting that the economy is on track for improved growth in the second half of 2011. How can such diametrically opposed views be reconciled? The simplest way to explain the discrepancy is that someone is lying. Any guesses as to who that might be?


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke in a Hole in Jackson as Wall Street Evacuates

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Fed Chair Ben Bernanke gave his much awaited speech at Jackson Hole friday morning saying little of substance and less of note. Hours later, but only after the market had a chance to rally, New York City Mayor Bloomberg ordered a mandatory evacuation on the low-lying areas of New York City including Wall Street itself.

The mainstream press couldn't wait to trump up Bernanke's empty clichés and pump up the stock market. Before Bernanke started his speech the market started dropping and the Dow Industrials were down 220 points while he was speaking. Within two hours, the Dow had rallied almost 400 points from its bottom. Such huge market moves in a short period of time indicate an unhealthy market. When stocks bend too much, they eventually break.

What was the great revelation from the Fed Chairs speech? It was "the U.S. is headed for long-term economic growth". Another brilliant insight from the man that said subprime mortgages wouldn't cause any significant problem up to one month before they began torpedoing the stock market and the economy. Bernanke also failed to stop the worst bear market and recession since the Great Depression in the 1930s and let the world financial system fall off a cliff because he failed to understand what would happen if Lehman Brothers failed. But like the dim-witted son of a third world dictator, the press still slavishly talks him up after each ill-fated move.

Just as a barely subdued economic panic impacts America's main sreet communities, New York is on edge because of Hurricane Irene. Food stores and the transportation hubs are mobbed. People in low lying areas have been ordered to evacuate just before the authorities are closing down the subway system and commuter railroads -- the only way out for many New York residents. Another example of government action at its best. That Wall Street itself is in danger of being flooded just after more wisdom from Chairman Ben is an irony that should not go unappreciated.   


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economists Don't See The Recession That Has Already Started

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

A just released survey of 43 mainstream economists polled this month by the AP pegs the chances of the U.S. falling into recession in the next year at only 26% (one in four). As a group, the economists predict the economy will expand by over 2% in the second half of the year. Other news that appeared with the survey results included an article about how food stamp use in the U.S. is skyrocketing - a highly unlikely occurrence during an economic recovery.

When deciding how much credence should be given to the current recession view of the economics profession, investors should consider how accurately they predicted the Great Recession - the worst one since the 1930s. The recession began in December 2007. That same month a survey of 54 mainstream economist was published by Business Week under the title, "A Slower But Steady Economy" (AP could have used the same title for its current survey). How many of these highly-paid top economists realized that the U.S. was in recession?  None, zero, nada, zilch. How many thought that the U.S. was about to experience the worst recession in almost 80 years? None, zero, nada, zilch.
Unless you have reason to believe that establishment economists have been regularly taking handfuls of smart pills in the last three years, it's unlikely that their views are any more accurate today.

Instead of listening to the miss-opinion of mainstream economists constantly being shoveled out by the mainstream media, investors would be wise to look at the hard evidence of what is actually taking place in the economy.  Approximately 46 million Americans (15% of the population) are on food stamps. The number has increased by 74% since 2007. One wonders how big the increase would have been without the economic "recovery" that has supposedly taken place. Many of the people who receive food stamps are employed part-time and sometimes full-time in low paying jobs. If so, they are not part of the unemployment statistics and are considered successful examples of the U.S. pulling itself out of recession.  

Of course having a large part of the country on food-aid is an expensive proposition. How exactly has the U.S. paid for this?  Well, one way is through the approximately $2 trillion in money that the Federal Reserve has printed since 2007. Two trillion dollars of phony money can really juice up an economy. Without it, the GDP would still be in a deep hole from its 2007 levels and the illusion of  economic recovery wouldn't exist. If it turns there's no free lunch after all, the U.S. is going to be hit with a very big inflation bill in the future. Don't expect Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to see this coming though. After all, the Fed remained oblivious to the Great Recession long after it had started. Even in the spring of 2008, their meeting notes indicate that they were still hopeful about avoiding the recession that had begun months before.  

Investors should expect an ongoing stream of articles in the next several weeks or even months about how the U.S. is not going to experience another recession. The stock market is sending a very different message though and even the fluffed up economic statistics the government produces are likely to  look a bit anemic this fall. But don't worry, establishment economists are optimistic as they always are when a recession begins.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security. Investing is risky and if you don't think you are capable of doing it yourself, seek professional advice.

New Home Sales: Still at Depression Levels

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The June New Homes Sales figures were released today and the Commerce Department claimed they were up almost 24%. Stocks rallied strongly on the supposedly good news. A revision of May's all-time low number to a much worse all-time low number is what gave the appearance of a strong rebound.

New home sales for May were originally reported at a 300,000 annual rate last month. This compares to a high of around 1.4 million in 2005. It was also the lowest number ever recorded in the history of the data. As bad as 300,000 was, and it was truly awful, there was a significant downward revision for May sales in the current report to only 267,000.

May sales were also not the only month with a downward revision. The figures for April were originally reported as 504,000 in the report released in May. Then in the report released in June, they were revised lower to 446,000. Then in today's July report they were revised downward again to 422,000. Do we see a trend here?

The home buyer tax credit was good until the end of April. With the revised numbers, new home sales actually fell 37% in May, not the merely disastrous 33% originally reported. The drop from the originally reported April number was 47% however. If you wish to claim there was a 24% rebound for the numbers in June, as the government did, you need to put it in the context of a 47% drop first taking place, otherwise you are comparing apples to oranges. No matter how you look at it though, new home sales were and still are at depression levels.

New home sales figures have been continually revised downward for several months now. It is highly likely that the 330,000 number just reported for June will be revised lower next month and quite possibly lower again the month after that. The Commerce Department reports the best number possible the month of the release. The mainstream media then gives that news big attention and uses it to reinforce an image that government programs are being effective. When the downward revisions take place in future months and indicate things aren't quite so rosy, that news gets buried in the article - if it is mentioned at all. This is not the only U.S. government data where this pattern exists, nor does this only take place in this country. Investors shouldn't let themselves be tricked by this game.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Five Recessions the Fed Failed to Predict

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Federal Reserve is confident that a double-dip recession won't be taking place. One of the major forecasting tools they use to determine this is yield curve analysis. This approach has never really worked and can't possibly work in a ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) environment.

According to their yield curve model, the Fed is predicting there is only a 10% chance of a recession in the near future. Before breathing a sigh of relief, investors should ask themselves how well this model has worked in the past. Here are the relevant questions and answers:

Did the model accurately predict the 2007-09 recession, the worst since the Great Depression?  Well, no it didn't.

Did the model accurately predict the 2001 recession? Err, well no it didn't do that either.

Did the model accurately predict the 1990-91 recession? Well, it missed that one as well.

Did the model predict the huge downturn in 1973-75?  Well no, it failed then too.

Did the model predict the 1969-70 downturn?  No, that was another one it missed. 

The only time the model predicted a greater than 50% chance (and it was only a little above 50%, so the prediction was basically no better than tossing a coin) of a recession was for the 1980 and the 1981-82 recessions. This had nothing to do with the double dip nature of those recessions, but was a factor of the high interest rate environment that made it possible for short-term interest rates to be higher than long-term rates. It is quite obvious that the higher interest rates are, the better this model works. The model in fact can't work at all when short-term rates are close to zero as they are now. In such circumstances, the yield curve can't invert because nominal long-term interest rates would have to be negative - an impossibility. So with our current low interest rates, the Fed model will never predict a recession.

As usual when the economy is falling apart, the Fed is making its usual positive comments of how things are really in good shape and the public should ignore all the reality-based signs of trouble. Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher was on CNBC on Wednesday and stated with confidence, "while the recovery has slowed, it is unlikely the U.S. will fall back into recession". The Fed was also very confident of avoiding the Great Recession as well and continued to say so long after the recession had begun.

Disclosure: No positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Drop in Shipping Indicates Slowing Global Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Baltic Dry Index, a measure of international shipping rates for dry bulk cargoes, hit new lows for the year on Monday June 28th. The index has dropped sharply in the last month and is indicating that global manufacturing activity is experiencing a major slowdown.

Shipping rates are very dependent on market demand (it takes a long time to build a large ship and to increase the supply of shipping capacity) and will rise and fall sharply in response to it. The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY:IND) is a daily record of costs to ship goods such as building materials, coal, metallic ores and grains. Oil and natural gas are not included in the index. Many of the products that are included are used as inputs somewhere in the manufacturing pipeline.

Shipping activity for 2010 peaked so far on May 26th when the Baltic Dry Index reached 4209. Yesterday, a little more than one month later, the index stood at 2447 - a 42% drop. Until this week, the low for the year had been 2501 on January 25th.  Not only is shipping at a new low for 2010, but the high for this year was less than the high reached on November 23, 2009. On that date the index was 4423 and as of now that was the post Credit Crisis peak. This compares to the all-time high of 11,793. It looks like we won't be reaching that level again anytime soon.

Lower highs and lower lows paint a picture of a weakening trend for shipping. The next key level for investors to watch is 2163. This was the low in activity on September 24, 2009. If the index breaks below this, returns to the incredibly lackluster levels in the spring of 2009 are possible. It is not likely though that we will be returning to the all-time low level of 663 from December 5, 2008. At that time, global economic activity was literally frozen and was at a severe depression level. Even in a fairly steep double dip recession, there should be more shipping activity than that.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The State of the Union for Investors

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


We live in extraordinary times. The U.S. economy is at risk of veering toward a multi-year depressionary state or experiencing a massive bout of inflation. Based on president Obama's State of the Union address last night, investors should still be worrying about both possibilities.

The impact of the global Credit Crisis that began in 2007 has been deep and prolonged so far. It was met with extraordinary government action in terms of spending and in pumping liquidity into the financial system - both of which are inflationary in the long-term. Despite these efforts, economic recovery in the U.S. has been tepid and elusive so far. This has not stopped our leadership from taking credit for 'saving us from another depression' despite the lack of evidence to support this view. On a number of economic fronts, the situation has continued to deteriorate, but Washington continues to congratulate itself on its great performance. The State of the Union address with its almost uninterrupted applause for a long litany of meaningless political platitudes provides the perfect picture of just how out of touch Washington is and how oblivious they are to their record of failure.

In his speech last night, president Obama emphasized that jobs creation would be the focus of his administration this year. For those with short memories, this was also stated as the prime focus of the White House in January 2009. The U.S. unemployment rate was 7.2% at that time and the claim was that if congress didn't pass the proposed $845 billion stimulus package, unemployment would reach double digits by the end of the year. Democrats said they emphasized government spending over tax relief in the bill because that was the best and fastest way to create jobs. Well, congress passed Obama's package, really a massive giveaway to a number of special interests, and the unemployment rate was 10.0% at the end of the year.  Based on their own criteria, the White House's 2009 attempt at job creation was a complete failure and a big waste of taxpayer dollars. For some reason this wasn't mentioned in the president's upbeat speech.

By this point, I don't think anyone should expect an honest appraisal from the White House on any aspect of the administration's performance. Obama made a number of negative references in his speech to the much derided Wall Street bailout program, TARP. He stated that it was "about as popular as a root canal" and it was something which "I hated". What was left unstated was that while he was a presidential candidate Obama made phone calls to round up Democratic support for the bill and this was instrumental in passing it and one of the first acts of his administration in 2009 was to get congress to release the second $350 billion allocated in the bill so it could be spent. Imagine what he would have done if he had liked TARP.

Deficit reduction was another item highlighted in the State of the Union speech. Perhaps this was meant as the comic relief - I don't know. Apparently this will start in the 2011 budget. Obama stated that he had already found $20 billion in inefficient programs in next year's budget and would pore over it "line by line" to find even more. The 2011 budget hasn't been released yet, but the budget deficit for the 2010 budget (starting on October 1, 2009) is now estimated to be $1.35 trillion. A savings of $20 billion would reduce the current deficit by less than 1.5% and lower it to only $1.33 trillion. Doesn't exactly look like a big dent in profligate government spending does it?  While this is completely meaningless, Obama also claimed that if his health care program was passed it would result in a trillion dollar reduction in the budget deficit (over a many year period, but that wasn't emphasized). A big spending government program leading to deficit reduction?  Yeah, that can happen. Any investor who believes this should stop investing immediately because you are probably buying stock in the Brooklyn Bridge.

Despite the claims coming from Washington, the recession is not over. The White House, congress, and even the Federal Reserve seem incapable of recognizing this because it would be an admission of failure on their part. At some point it will be recognized however because the American public will insist on it (the message from the surprise upset in the Massachusetts senate race seems to have eluded the White House so far). Modern democracies will always eventually err on the side of more government spending. As we have seen in the last year, this doesn't necessarily solve the problem of a bad economy and thus it is still possible for an intractable depression to take hold. Too much government spending does eventually lead to the problem of excessive government debt though and at some point the debt becomes so high that it is impossible to pay off. That's when intractable inflation shows up. Historically, the worst economic disasters take place when government is most oblivious to these unfolding problems. In that case, Americans have a lot to worry about. President Obama stated more than once in his speech last night "I don't quit". Based on his first year in office, he should have said, "I don't listen".

Disclosure: Not applicable.

NEXT: The Twilight of Ben Bernanke

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Consumers Lack Confidence, They Also Lack Credit

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Before the Credit Crisis began, consumer spending made up 72% of U.S. GDP.  The current economic numbers indicate that there is little chance that this part of the economy will be recovering any time soon. Consumers have neither the desire to spend, nor the availability of funds to make it possible.

The Conference Board's consumer confidence numbers for January came in at 55.9. The historic average is 95 and somewhere around 90 is considered the dividing point between bad and good. While it is true that the current number is better than the depression level all-time low of 25.3 in February 2009, the readings have been range bound between around 50 since last June. The numbers indicate quite clearly that consumers are in no mood to shop. Even if they were, where would they get the money? 

The dismal job picture with 10% unemployment (not including discouraged workers and people forced to work part-time, which brings the U.S. unemployment number to the 17% to 20% level) is only one reason that consumers won't spend. The latest figures from November 2009 indicate that consumer credit was falling at an 8.5% annual rate. Revolving credit (much of which is credit card debt) was falling at an 18.5% annual rate. The big banks that took TARP money with the understanding that they would increase lending have increasingly cut consumers off.

The lack of consumer spending would have had more serious impact on U.S. GDP figures if large increases in government spending hadn't taken up the slack. Government subsidies have held up the housing and the auto markets, but this is completely artificial and produces only an illusion of economic recovery, rather than the real thing. Investors should keep in mind that no sustainable U.S. economic recovery is possible without the participation of the consumer. Otherwise, no matter how good the GDP numbers are in any given quarter, the improvement will only be temporary.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Home Sales Fall Expectedly

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Case Against Reappointing Ben Bernanke

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Economics is one of the few professions where incompetence is regularly rewarded. The attempt to keep Ben Bernanke as head of the Federal Reserve for a second term is one of the most glaring examples of this practice - and one that will have serious negative repercussions for the United States going forward.

When president Obama announced that he was reappointing Bernanke last August, the reason he gave was that 'Bernanke prevented another depression'. This sound bite has been mindlessly repeated by politicians - senate leader Harry Reid most recently - and economically challenged media commentators ever since. Until the U.S. economy returns to its pre-Credit Crisis state, we will not know whether or not that we have been saved from another depression. There is more than enough evidence to indicate that we haven't been - double digit unemployment, bank loan portfolios that continue to deteriorate, rising bankruptcies and bank failures, lack of lending by the banks, and a housing market that only functions because of numerous government programs that prop it up are just a few reasons why this claim is wrong. Obama would not be the first U.S. president to prematurely call the end to a depression, Herbert Hoover did so in June 1930 when he told the press that the Great Depression was over - it was almost three years before the bottom and at least another decade before that was indeed the case.

One thing that will be pointed to as evidence of recovery will be good GDP numbers later this week - estimates are as high as 6% annualized growth for the fourth quarter of 2009.  If GDP numbers were calculated in a way that measured actual economic growth this would indeed be encouraging. Unfortunately, they are not. U.S. GDP figures for 2008 were positive even though it is universally recognized that the U.S. was in a severe recession the entire year - this is a theoretical impossibility, yet no one talks about it. The lesson of Japan in the 1990s and 2000s warns against using GDP figures as evidence that an economic crisis is over. Japan had quarters of over 10% annualized GDP growth. They were 'saved' from a depression as many as seven times (depends on how you count) in the last two decades. Their economy has nevertheless continued a long, slow leak since 1990 and bigger problems are likely in the next decade, which will be the third one after their crisis began. In reality, Japan extended its depression over a very long period of time; none of its government's actions prevented it.

The defect in the 'saving from depression' argument is an implicit assumption that the economy has two states like a light switch, on and off, instead of an infinite number of possible outcomes. Many of those outcomes involve inflation and hyperinflation. There is no discussion of the negative consequences of Bernanke's actions among his supporters - and all economic policy actions have side effects, many of which can be extremely undesirable. Bernanke himself wrote his PhD thesis on Fed policy errors during the 1930s and demonstrated that restrictive Fed monetary policy led to the debacle. He also came to the conclusion that doing the opposite would fix the problem. If the economy was as simple as a light switch it would. In a complex system, this is not the case. Doing the opposite may simply lead to a different disastrous outcome.

Bernanke also didn't show understanding of the impending problems within the financial system, nor did he react quickly. As late as June 2007, Bernanke was assuring people that there would be no problem with subprime loans. In July the problem blew up. As late as the spring of 2008, the Fed was releasing statements that they were hopeful they would still be able to prevent a recession. The recession had already begun in December 2007, but the Fed was unaware of it. In September 2008, Lehman was allowed to fail with the subsequent excuse being given that no one was interested in buying it. Only days later AIG was nationalized when no one would buy it. The Lehman failure set off a general global financial collapse. Bernanke is now claiming credit from 'saving' the system from this collapse with his quick action. As one commentator astutely observed, this is like an arsonist wanting credit for putting out a fire that he had started.

Bernanke was originally appointed by George Bush and is one of the key economic actors along with the current Treasury secretary Tim Geithner from the Bush administration. While on one hand president Obama constantly criticizes Bush economic policies and how much damage they have caused, on the other he has gone out of his way to keep the Bush economic team mostly in place. This is reminiscent of Obama's newfound criticism of irresponsible giveaways to the big banks. For those who don't recall, the TARP bill originally failed in its first congressional vote. Presidential candidate Obama was instrumental in rounding up enough Democratic votes to get it passed on a second try. Now, Bush deserves the blame.

Bernanke's appointment runs out on January 31st. The slow-moving senate has yet to get around to voting on it. While Bernanke has had his detractors in congress, they became energized after the surprise upset in the Massachusetts special senate election last week that indicated quite clearly that American voters are angry about how the economy has been handled. Senators up for reelection in November (only one-third of the total) particularly began to have second thoughts, as indeed they should. Support for Bernanke may come back to haunt them in the future even more than support for the ill-fated health care bill. Bernanke is almost guaranteed to win the vote to reappoint him however. The White House is leaning heavily on Democratic senators to support him and hoping that the public isn't paying too much attention. Voters tend to notice though when they don't have a job.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Consumers Lack Confidence, They Also Lack Credit

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Interest Rates Go Negative Again

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

At one point on November 19th, the yield on a new 3-month T-bill fell to 0.005%. A rational person would think you couldn't go lower than that, but a rational person would be wrong. The yield on 3-month bills maturing in January 2010 briefly turned negative. This was not the first time in recent history. It happened last year on December 9th, 2008 at the bottom of the Credit Crisis - or at least what has perceived to be the bottom so far. A 3-month T-bill auction on that date had a high bid equivalent of 0.000%. Apparently not everyone got in at that great rate.

Interest rates below zero are theoretically impossible. After all why not just keep the cash instead of settling for less money after a period of time? They do happen in the real world however and are an indication of extreme risk aversion on the part of banks. They are a marker of severe financial crisis. Before the current Credit Crisis, T-bill yields were only negative in the U.S. in 1940, after years of financial stress from the Great Depression. The auction low for T-bills was 0.01% in January of that year. Rates apparently went negative because of punitive property taxes imposed by a number of U.S. states. T-bills were not taxable and investors kept more of their money by taking a slight loss on T-bills than if they had paid the tax. No such special circumstances exist today to justify negative interest rates. The explanation for current negative rates is that banks are loading up on short term government instruments to improve the appearance of their year-end balance sheets.

Negative interest rates also took place in Japan during their current 19-year (and counting) financial debacle. Short-term interbank lending had a negative return one weekend in January 2003. As was the case in the U.S. during 1940, years of severe financial stress preceded this event. In Japan's case there were a series of rolling recessions - the modern version of depression thanks to government's now common practice of continual economic stimulus programs. There have been other cases of negative interest rates, however these seem to have been utilized (usually officially by the government) as a type of currency control. Switzerland imposed negative interest rates during 1970s after years of appreciation of the franc for instance, but only for foreign depositors.

The appearance of negative interest rates after a long period of financial stress raises the question of when economic problems actually began in the United States. It is reasonable to assume that they started long before the awareness of the Credit Crisis in 2007. Interest rate anomalies may have in fact already existed in 2003. While it is not generally known, between August to November some U.S. government repurchase agreements had negative rates. There is more than enough evidence to indicate that recessionary period actually began in the U.S. in 2000. Manipulated inflation rates and GDP calculations hid the details from the public. The U.S. government, businesses, and consumers lived off ever-increasing borrowing which made up for declining income. The Credit Crisis was merely the unraveling of this scheme, not when the financial problems started. The return of negative rate indicates a deeply entrenched problem within the U.S. financial system - and it doesn't look like it has been fixed yet.

Disclosure: No position in T-bills.

NEXT: For Gold, Overbought Means Overgood

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank Bankruptcy Bonanza

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

CIT filed for bankruptcy in New York on Sunday. This is the fourth biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history, just behind number three General Motors (Lehman Brothers was number one). The CIT bankruptcy filing followed nine bank failures on Friday, which coincidentally involved the 4th largest bank failure this year. The FDIC Insurance fund which pays off depositors of failed banks is itself bankrupt. CIT itself is a bank holding company and became one last year in order to TARP funds. It will not be countered as a failed bank since it is expected to come out of bankruptcy.

The amount of money the government put into CIT was a small $2.3 billion (compared to $45 billion put directly into Citibank). CIT was not deemed too big to fail. It has actually been on the verge of collapse for several months now and almost went under in July. Lots of parties have been holding it up, including Goldman Sachs, with temporary measures since then - and for good reason. CIT is the largest loan provider for small and medium sized business in the U.S and 300,000 retail outlets are at least partially dependent on it for their merchandise. Imagine the impact on the holiday shopping season (goods are already at the stores by this point) if CIT had failed in the summer? The U.S. economy would have taken a major hit since retailing is its largest industry.

The federal government's indifference to CIT puts the lie to Bernanke, Paulson and Geithner's claims that the TARP government bailout money was to restore lending and support the economy. The biggest U.S. lender to small and medium size businesses has been allowed to fail. Before the failure, its was drastically cutting its loans to try and stay afloat. CIT lent $11.3 billion in the first half of 2008, but only $4.4 billion in the first half of 2009. While this was taking place the large banks, who got copious amounts of TARP money to increase lending, were cutting consumer credit sharply. So the U.S. has moved toward an economy where only big businesses and the rich are supplied with adequate credit (a third-world model). There is no way an actual economic recovery can take place given this situation.

Of course the government will probably come up with a plan for the CIT post-bankruptcy. I imagine a Cash Loans for Clunker Businesses program where huge amounts of money are lent to insolvent subprime businesses that don't have a chance of every making any money (businesses with Washington connections will be at the top of the list and get 99% of the funding). Bernanke is probably starting up the printing presses right now to pay for it. Just as a reminder, Bernanke claims he and the other central bankers 'saved' the financial system last year and he has been heralded by Obama for preventing another depression. With 115 bank failures this year and counting, a major financial company bankruptcy, and an insolvent FDIC bank insurance fund, the financial system isn't looking so 'saved' lately. Well, at least we've got the stock market, which just had its best seven month performance since 1933 . Hey, wasn't that during the Great Depression?

NEXT: Markets Roller Coaster Ride Powered by Media Hype

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

If You Ignore the Facts, Things Are Good

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

We are going to see a lot of new economic data in the next few days, including the monthly jobs report tomorrow. How the market reacts in the first four trading days of the quarter can give us a lot of insight on where stock and commodity prices will be heading in the next few months. The Consumer Spending report was already out this morning and spending for August was up 1.3%, the biggest gain since October 2001. The rosy numbers were due to the Cash for Clunkers program which ended August 31st... so don't expect September's numbers to look as good. The ISM Manufacturing report for September will be out later this morning and might provide more insight into the post Cash for Clunkers era, although the October report next month will be more revealing.

Weekly jobs claims surged upward to 551,000 this morning. The big rise was a surprise to economists and other people who's expectations are based on fantasy. Any number at or above 400,000 indicates the economy is in recession, 551,000 indicates a somewhat severe recession. A healthy economy has weekly claims at the 300,000 level. The idea that the economy can be recovering while unemployment gets worse is absurd and merely reflects how manipulated U.S. GDP figures are. The government can also 'statistically adjust' the jobs report as well. Watch to see how many people left the labor market in tomorrow's report. This is the fudge factor that the government uses to keep the reported unemployment rate from getting too high.

While all the money pumping the Fed has done in the last year has had only temporary and limited impact on the economy so far, it has certainly revved up the stock market. Last quarter was the best quarter for U.S. stocks since the fourth quarter of 2008 - the beginning of the tech bubble blow off that lasted until the beginning of 2000 and was followed by a Depression level drop in stock prices. The last six months have been the best two quarters for U.S. stocks since March 1987. Five months later U.S. stocks dropped 40% in only a few days. That was also at beginning of a bubble blow off. Only a handful of stocks survived the 1987 crash unscathed - most of them were gold miners. So far history seems to be repeating itself vis-a-vis money pumping and stock price behavior.

The IMF (International Monetary Fund) released revisions to its GDP predictions this morning. It now expects global GDP to decline only 1.1% this year, instead of 1.4% and for GDP to increase by 3.1% next year, instead of by 2.5%. While the report had the usual cheer leading bullish tone, a remark made at the press conference inadvertently revealed the truth. The IMF spokesman stated that the report "should not fool governments into thinking the crisis is over". Apparently they wanted to make it clear that their report was only intended to fool the public. The IMF also stated that the pattern of global demand needs to be rebalanced and this could not happen at current exchange rates and that countries with huge export surpluses needed to revalue their currencies upward. Doesn't that imply that countries with huge export deficits like the U.S. will see their currencies revalued lower? So much for that good news.

NEXT: Unemployment Rises as Car Sales Collapse

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Break in the Bull and China Stops Shopping

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

August has not been a good month for Chinese stocks. In mid-month, the markets were down 20%, but some recovery took place and it looked like the bull market which had moved stocks up 80% or more was holding. The month ended badly last night though. After dropping 3% on Friday, Shanghai was down 6.7% and Shenzhen down 7.1% last night. Volatility, and Chinese stocks have certainly been volatile in August, is classic sign of a bubble top. The market's plunge last night took place because of concern about a drop in bank lending. Like every other major government in the world, China has been pumping massive stimulus into the economy. Even the threat that the stimulus might be reduced is enough to tank the markets. What would happen if it actually was reduced?

There was no China contagion in the other Asian markets last night. They all had relatively minor drops. The Nikkei in Japan was even up strongly in the morning, but closed down slightly.
Initial bullishness was because of the election news. The ruling party, which has been in power almost continuously since 1955, was crushed at the polls. After approximately half a dozen recessions in the last 19 years, the Japanese electorate finally became fed up enough to try something else. The U.S. electorate is not likely to be so understanding for so long.

There are lessons for what has just happened in Japan for the U.S. Japan has been producing much better economic statistics lately. GDP turned strongly positive last quarter. Industrial production figures out last night were up for the fifth month in a row. Exports have been rising (thanks mostly to China - anything happens to the Chinese economy and the GDP will go right back in the tank in a number of countries). The real estate market turn up last year (after a 15 year drop) Despite the 'improving economy' unemployment is up and retail sales are very weak. The average Japanese citizen sees his or her personal situation deteriorating. Based on how the vote went, they obviously no longer believe the government's upbeat reports on the economy.

The picture in the U.S. right now is remarkably similar to Japan's. Economists predict 3% U.S. GDP growth this quarter. Industrial production is up. Real estate prices are supposedly going up (well, that's the claim at least). Exports are supposedly doing better. However, just like in Japan, unemployment is up and retail sales are in bad shape. The economy the average person sees is deteriorating. Without massive government stimulus, it would look like the 1930s depression. Government stimulus was also the key component in improving the Japanese economy, as has been the case over and over again since 1990. Keeping the U.S. economy out of recession, will require ongoing stimulus as well and in our case this means massive money printing. When governments are forced to chose between recession and inflation, inflation always wins out. No government can risk ongoing recession and survive - even in Japan apparently.

NEXT: Next Five Days Critical for Stock Rally

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke Reappointed, Court Order and FDIC

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke is going to be reappointed for another 4 year term. Obama decided to reappoint Bernanke because he wanted to keep together the team that had weathered the Credit Crisis, an administration official said. This is of course like reappointing the team that did such a 'good job' handling Hurricane Katrina. Just as Bush praised those incompetents, 'change you can believe in' Obama praised Bernanke for preventing another depression. Bernanke was first appointed by Bush and didn't foresee the Credit Crisis coming, nor did he respond appropriately once it did. There is of course also no evidence that another depression has been prevented . So far, it is just some fantasy that politicians inside the Beltway keep repeating to each other.

In other Fed related news, a federal court in New York has ordered the Fed make available information from 11 of its Credit Crisis programs to the public. The court ruled that the Fed improperly withheld records under the Freedom of Information law. Bloomberg News sued (kudos to them) and is trying to find out how much money was given to which banks. In its defense of the case, the Fed (which I would like to remind you is only a quasi-governmental entity - the big banks own stock in it and have their representatives sit on the Fed's regional board of directors) essentially maintained that it was above the law. Undermining our democratic system - just another example of the 'good job' that Ben Bernanke has been doing.

The FDIC is also in the news again. For some reason, even though the Credit Crisis is supposedly over and the economy is recovering U.S. bank failures are skyrocketing. The agency needs new bidders for failed banks because existing banks are now avoiding purchasing them. The FDIC's deposit insurance funds are also getting depleted. The FDIC is proposing a rule change that will allow private equity firms to buy failed banks and maintain capital ratios of 10% instead of 15%. This will of course make the failed banks likely to fail again - and I bet the private equity firms will scream for a government bailout when this happens. Indy Mac and Bank United were already sold to private equity firms earlier this year. Based on this news, we can presume that the FDIC is not using the Bernanke approach of threatening to fire any bank president that doesn't agree to the government's proposed takeover demands, as happened with Bank America. Since these banks are NOT too big to fail, they are not being directly nationalized as was AIG or indirectly nationalized as was the case with most of the big U.S. commercial banks and brokers. Undermining our capitalist system - just another example of the 'good job' that Ben Bernanke has done.

The biggest danger in any crisis is leadership that is oblivious and is in denial. The crisis only gets worse under such circumstances. Bernanke has been a disaster as a federal reserve chair by any criteria that you wish to measure his tenure by. Obama is not only totally ignorant of basic economics and devoid of any ideas for handling our current situation, but is even oblivious to what the current situation is. His actions remind me of Herbert Hoover's famous June 1930 press conference stating the Depression was over. Hoover was more than a decade early.

NEXT: Consumer Confidence Game and Housing's False Bottom

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Unemployment Rises to 15.6%

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Jobs Report was out this morning and it was pretty gloomy. While the headline number indicated that unemployment rose to 8.5%, a more accurate number is 15.6%. The second figure includes many (but not all) discouraged workers, those who have looked for work in the last year, but not during the last month, and part-time workers who wish to work full-time. It is the 15.6% figure that you should compare to the approximately 25% unemployment rate at the bottom of the Depression in the 1930s.

The initial read for March was a loss of 663,000 jobs (close to economists predictions of 654,000). There will be two revisions for this number in May and June and expect both of them to be down, although the worse and worst figures will get no press and the BLS is well aware of that. January's number, originally reported as a loss of 598,000 jobs, had its second revision down today and the number is now a loss of 741,000. So far, there has been a loss of 3.7 million jobs in the U.S. economy in just the last six months. Expect this number to be even lower after all the revisions have been done.

Last month every sector except health care had job losses. In previous Jobs Reports since the Credit Crisis began, government and education have supposedly added jobs. Manufacturing continues to be decimated with a loss of 126,000 jobs in March. The Obama goal of driving GM into bankruptcy should help make these numbers even worse in the future. Professional and Business Services, which held up much longer than Manufacturing, had a loss of 133,000 jobs last month. Retail lost 48,000 jobs (and is very vulnerable to much greater losses). Despite all the bailout money, Financial Services still lost 43,000 jobs. Construction lost 161,000 jobs and with a commercial real estate collapse just beginning unemployment there could rise much higher. Not only were a lot of jobs lost last month, but the average workweek fell to a record low as well.

The stock market is selling off slightly so far on the employment news, which is not surprising considering the big rally in the last two days. The positive reaction of stock markets globally at the beginning of the quarter should help carry the current rally for another month or two, although after a big surge, sideways trading or selling for awhile is inevitable. Whether the rally can survive into the third quarter is problematical. For the moment, investors should keep in mind the old stock market adage from the 1800s - 'sell in May and go away'.

NEXT: Geither Talks, Market Drops .... Again

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Tumbles While Washington Fumbles

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If it doesn't seem to you that anyone is in charge in Washington, you're not hallucinating. While President Obama is busy worrying about lobbyists attacking his 2010 budget proposals and Treasury Secretary Geithner still fails to realize his job has something to do with the markets, U.S. stocks are tanking. The decline in financials, Citigroup was just above penny stock status at its low of 1.15 yesterday, is sending a clear message that Washington's piecemeal plan to deal with banks is ineffective. While the actions of the Bush administration failed to prevent further erosion of the financial system, the conclusion that the Obama administration seems to have come to is that if they do even less of the same ineffective things, this will solve the problem.

The action in U.S. stocks yesterday was brutal. The Dow was down 4.4% and traded below 7000 for the first time since 1997. The new low of 6737 is still well above a band of strong support that ranges from 5600 to 6200 or so. The S&P 500 was down even more, dropping 4.7% and traded briefly at 699, also for the first time since 1997. The Nasdaq held up better the other indices, falling only 4.0% and its close of 1322 is still above its November low of 1295. The small cap Russell 2000 was hit the worst of all with a crash level 5.4% plunge. It finally broke its November low by a couple of points.

The market drop is not isolated to the U.S. and is a resounding vote of no confidence in the handling of the Credit Crisis by world leaders. The sharp sell of in the U.S. was exacerbated by the S&P 500 breaking its November low last Friday. This confirmed that the S&P made a huge double top in 2000 and 2007. The neckline low set in 2002 was actually violated last November, but the markets rallied immediately. We were not so lucky this time. The next strong support for the S&P is in the 600 to 630 range. The S&P at 600 roughly translates to Dow 5600 and Nasdaq 1100 (the low set in 2002 was 1108). This would be a strong floor of support that the market would have trouble breaking.... certainly the first time.

In the near term, a rally can take at any point from here on in. The oversold level of the market is at extremes. What will set this rally off and what day it will start won't be known until it happens. You can assume that it will only be temporary as well. The ultimate low is way off in the future.

The monthly meeting of the New York Investing meetup is tonight at 6:45PM and it will be held at PS 41, 116 West 11th Street (at 6th Ave).

NEXT: Stocks Looking for a Bottom, Oil More Bullish

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Deepening Global Recession Means More Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The economic news out this morning corroborates a deepening global recession. GDP in the eurozone fell 1.5% during Q4 2008. This is the third drop in the row and the steepest. Predictions are that Japan's Q4 GDP will fall somewhere around a 10% annual rate. Media coveraged emphasized how the U.S. economy was doing better than those overseas, rather than questioning the absurdity of the U.S. GDP figures. Dire warnings of DEFLATION were mixed in with the reporting.

While it is true that declining economic growth leads to falling demand (an economic argument that discusses only demand and not supply is meaningless) and the current declines are rivaling the Great Depression in the 1930s, this doesn't mean there will be deflation this time around. During the Depression, the U.S. monetary authorities contracted the money supply in the beginning, which is a major reason the Depression lasted so long and became so steep. Currently, the monetary authorities are inflating the money supply at a rate worthy of Weimar Germany in the early 1920's or Brazil in its inflationary heyday. Simple common sense indicates the outcome will be different now than it was in the 1930s.

The truth will be found in the markets. While they can be manipulated in the short term, in the long term they have to move to accurate price levels (unless the government bans trading, which has indeed happened many times in the past). Even though constant efforts are made to suppress the price of inflation-indicator gold, it is nevertheless still rising and could easily hit a new all time high sometime within the next several weeks. It reached 950.00 in futures trading yesterday, just a smidge below the 1000 level. Silver has also been rallying strongly in the last two months. Oil is trying to find a bottom at current levels and expect it to put in a good rally once it does.

Anyone who reads this blog knows the alledged deflation that is taking place is accounted for almost completely by falling oil prices. While the manipulations in the gold market are well documented, oil is probably even more manipulated but in different ways. Right now Light Sweet Crude is in extreme contango (prices for futures months are much higher than the current price). While the current oil contract was trading at $34.45 this morning, April was trading at $42.14 and June was trading at $47.62. Also the price of Brent (an inferior grade of oil) is way above Light Sweet Crude, with Brent trading at $45.90. This is the reverse of the usual price relationship and is somewhat analogous to table wine costing more than a good champagne. Light Sweet Crude may have put in a double bottom yesterday (only time will tell), falling to $33.98, close to the low of $33.16 reached last December 19th. Press coverage on oil seems to have changed this morning, with some talk about how supply is going to be reduced at current prices and how this can support prices even though demand is falling (did someone recently give the reporters a basic lesson in economics?).

Ignore all the talk about deflation coming from the press and well-known deflationists like Noriel Roubini (who is predicting a big decline in consumer prices). Yes, global economies are sinking, but monetary and fiscal stimulation (both of which are inflationary) are being applied at historically high levels. It's only a matter of time before they work their (black) magic. Just remember though that it takes many years before the full impact of inflation shows up.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.