What's Behind the Move in Gold and Silver Prices

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The euro rescue plan announced pre-market Monday morning has yet to calm jittery financial markets. Gold hit a record high yesterday on rumors that Germany was planning on leaving the currency union and going back to using Deutsche marks. Silver has benefited from a U.S. government investigation of JP Morgan and its possible manipulation of global silver trading.

Gold has been rising for several years now against all major paper currencies and this indicates a massive global devaluation of fiat money (currencies that are not backed by hard assets) is taking place. We are still only in the early stages of that devaluation. When the Greek debt crisis surfaced, gold fell from December to February. Superficially, this makes sense because gold usually trades with the euro and the euro was dropping. After February, gold recaptured its usually safe haven status and starting rising as the euro continued to fall. The trade-weighted U.S. dollar was of course going up at the same time. The dollar is also traditionally a safe haven whenever there is a crisis in the world. In this case though, the dollar is hardly more sound than the euro and a good case can be made that U.S. government finances are even worse than Greece's.

There is no question that the euro currency union cannot continue to operate the way it has up to this point. When the eurozone was created, there seems to have been no consideration of how matters would be handled if problems arose - a truly amazing lack of foresight. The Greek debt crisis also revealed that the eurozone authorities were unwilling to take necessary action to enforce the standards supporting their currency. Greece lied to the EU about it fiscal position for years and its budget deficit to GDP ratio for 2009 is more than four times what is permissible by currency union rules. If this doesn't get it thrown out of the union, it appears that nothing could ever happen that would get a country removed from the eurozone. This is how the rumors that Germany would withdraw from the euro could take hold and gain some credence. At this point in time though, there is a zero percent chance that this would take place. Such an action would create a crash in the world financial system that would be much greater than what occurred after Lehman's collapse. The authorities are well aware of this.

Silver, which trades with gold, has its own unique issues. News sources on May 9th reported that parallel civil and criminal investigations had been launched into whether or not JP Morgan has engaged in manipulative practices to keep down the price of silver. The CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission) is looking into civil charges, and the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division is handling the criminal probe. The CFTC has had complaints for years that a few big banks were manipulating silver prices, but just as the SEC ignored complaints against insider Bernie Madoff, the CFTC paid no attention. The CFTC hearings this spring on the silver market blatantly exposed the corrupt practices taking place. Nevertheless, the mainstream media ignored the story (just as a number of press outlets had the Madoff story for years, but failed to publish it). The hearings did get a lot of attention from blogosphere and on You Tube however and this may have finally put enough heat on the CFTC to take action.

From a technical perspective, gold has broken out from a cup structure (without a handle). Going to new highs is always a sign of strength.  Gold price action is being fed by and is in turn feeding a great deal of bullishness.  Too much bullishness though is not a good sign. The dangers for gold are a recovery in the euro (which is extremely oversold) and the market gaining some confidence in the bailout. The situation in Europe is likely to calm down into the summer. In the long-term problems will resurface however. Investors should also keep in mind that the IMF has a lot of gold and has decided to start selling it to pay for its programs (such as the euro bailout for instance). These sales can cause gold to experience a sharp and sudden price drop.

Investors can purchase gold and silver through ETFs (exchange traded funds). Gold ETFs that hold physical metals include GLD, IAU, and SGOL. Silver ETFs include SLV, USV and SIVR. The euro ETF is FXE and the trade-weighted dollar ETF is DXY.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CFTC's March 25th Hearings on the Metals Markets

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The CFTC (Commodities Future Trading Commission) held hearings on March 25th on whether to set controls on metal's trading in the U.S. futures markets. A representative from CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) testified that the CFTC's attempt to put hard limits on speculative activity in the U.S. metals markets is an attempt by the government oversight agency to overstep its bounds. A spokesman for HSBC claimed that limits on metal trading were simply unnecessary. The CFTC itself said it continues to look into allegations of market manipulation in the silver market in the summer of 2008.

The CFTC has previously held hearings on setting trading limits in energy and agricultural commodities. One of the reasons that the CFTC claims it needs to set position limits in trading is because of the finite supply of any commodity. The limits are supposedly protecting the market (from itself apparently) and the CFTC claims that government bureaucrats know more about how trading should be done than market participants. While there are actual glaring examples of how the gold and silver markets are manipulated by the big players, these are rarely on the CFTC's agenda. Like the other major market regulatory body, the SEC, the CFTC just doesn't seem to notice the behavior from the big money insiders that really distorts the market. For instance, CFTC hearings last summer on energy focused on ETF UNG, which held 20% of natural gas futures contracts. Even though this was an investment vehicle heavily used by small investors, the CFTC decided it was a danger to the integrity of the markets, as opposed to the trading activities of the big banks and hedge funds. The SEC took the same approach by paying limited attention to Bernie Madoff's $65 billion investment scam for almost two decades, but during the same period was very likely to use its resources to investigate some dentist in New Jersey who suspiciously bought a 1000 option contracts and made a couple of bucks.

The CFTC's concerns with energy and agricultural trading are obviously politically motivated. Politicians want to keep the prices of these commodities down since they are necessities and the source of destabilizing inflation. The UK prime minister and French president actually wrote a widely circulated article about how energy prices need to be determined by the big government's of the world just before the CFTC's energy hearings last summer. The U.S. had price controls on energy commodities in the early 1970s and the results were long lines at gas stations and fuel shortages. Under pricing in the markets always leads to trouble down the road.

The excuse for the CFTC considering limits on metal trading is even less justified than for energy or agriculture. As the HSBC representative pointed out, metals are not wasting assets that are consumed and then no longer available as is the case for oil and food commodities. Metals get recycled. Almost all of the gold that has ever been mined is still thought to be in existence. Higher prices increase the recycling rate and bring more supply to market, so the markets for gold and silver are self-correcting. While 50% of silver is used for industrial purposes, only 13% of gold is employed for manufacturing practical items. Most gold is used to make jewelry. Does the gold market need to be controlled, so the rich can be assured of getting good prices on holiday presents?

The CFTC is also not looking at where the actual manipulation is taking place in the gold market. This is done through central bank leasing to the large banks and hedge funds. They lease the gold for a small price and then can sell it on the market to raise some quick cash. This activity held down the price of gold in the 1990s and the early 2000s. The price of gold rose as leasing activity diminished. Artificially lowering the price of a commodity doesn't seem to come under the definition of market manipulation as far as the CFTC is concerned. Central banks, large international banks and big hedge funds also seem to be citizens above suspicion as Madoff was for the SEC.

While the CFTC is looking into manipulation into the silver markets, it may not mean that much. This is probably happening because silver investor Ted Butler has worked tirelessly to bring the situation to the public's attention, thereby putting some heat on the agency. How much the CFTC actually looks this time has yet to be determined. The SEC investigated Madoff many times, but just couldn't discover his blatantly obvious crooked activities. For some time, two big banks have frequently had huge short positions in silver futures -seemingly bigger than the Hunt Brother's who were convicted on federal charges on manipulating the silver prices in the 1980s. The CFTC has already investigated silver twice before in the 2000s and didn't find any irregularities. The SEC investigated Madoff more than two times.

Steve Sherrod, acting director of surveillance at the CFTC’s division of market oversight noted in today's hearings that when Comex silver prices fell sharply in the summer of 2008 that there was no significant change in the total long or short positions in the commitment of traders’ positions in the agency’s weekly data. Nor was there a significant change in open interest during the period of July and August 2008. Sherrod tried to explain away this seeming impossibility by stating, “One could explain a change in short open interest on the BPR (bank participation report) by a change within the classification system; if the usage code changed from non-bank to bank for a trader with a short position, then an increase in the short open interest would appear on the BPR, without any change in the COT (commitment of traders) Report. Another explanation would be a merger or acquisition where a bank assumes the position of a non-bank entity, both of whom were under the same commercial classification. That may not result in a change in open interest and may not result in a change in aggregate position within a COT classification. But it may result in an increase in the reported position on the BPR.”  Readers should carefully note Sherrod's wording (and language that seems more geared to hide what is going on than to clearly explain it). While this may have been what happened, Sherrod indicates that it also may not have been what happened. So how does this enlighten us?

The small investor shouldn't expect much, if anything, from the CFTC. It is realistically a government body that uses its powers to protect the big money interests, although it will claim that whatever it does is to benefit the public. Markets can also not be controlled without serious negative consequences. Government's have attempted to do so hundreds of times throughout the ages and it has never worked. Most commodity trading is international as well (natural gas is an exception), so restrictions in trading in the U.S. means that business will just move overseas. In this doesn't happen quickly enough, shortages will appear. You will have the CFTC to thank for them when they do.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Euro Zone Support Package Doesn't Solve the Problem

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The CFTC and Manipulation of the Silver Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) will be holding hearings on trading in the precious and base metals on March 25th in its Washington, D.C. offices. Possible manipulation of the silver market is on the agenda. Critics have maintained for years now that a few large banks hold down silver prices by having large concentrations of short positions in the market - and this disadvantages the small trader.

The CFTC has investigated manipulation of the silver market by the big banks before in 2004 and 2008. They found nothing. This should provide little comfort to investors however. The SEC, one of the other major U.S. market regulatory bodies, investigated Bernie Madoff many times over more than a decade and also found nothing. Madoff eventually turned himself in when his $50 billion Ponzi scheme fell apart on its own accord. Madoff had never made any trades in his mega sized scam, so the SEC's examination of his trading records couldn't have been very thorough. Running a simulation of Madoff's claimed trading strategy also would have revealed it didn't work. To invest the money that Madoff held in his fund, it would have been necessary for him to hold more than 100% of some S&P futures contracts, an obvious impossibility. Moreover a whistle blower detailed the Madoff scheme to the SEC years before it demise and large numbers of additional investors were bilked out of their life savings. Yet, the SEC still found nothing amiss. Investors should consider what the Madoff incident indicates about the quality of U.S. market regulation.

Silver futures trading is by no means an even playing field in the United States as is. Small traders can be paid in cash when their positions expire. Delivery of actual metal is guaranteed only for commercial users. This was particularly relevant in the fall of 2008, when the price of silver fell to around $9 an ounce on the futures market. The physical metal wasn't available for anywhere near that price in the open market. Prices of bars and coins were much, much higher. The option of getting silver at the exceptionally low futures price was not open to the little guy however. The CFTC, whose motto is 'Ensuing the Integrity of the Futures and Options Market', sees nothing wrong with this.

Silver has been manipulated in the past of course. The Hunt Brothers were convicted on federal charges in 1988 for trying to corner the market in 1980. At one point they controlled a third of the global supply not held by governments. When silver prices went vertical and got to the $50 level, the CFTC ordered COMEX to halt trading in long silver positions. A market that only allows shorting will of course collapse and this is exactly what happened. Silver prices plummeted.  Rumors at the time alleged that a number of well-connected insiders made fortunes by shorting silver just before the CFTC's action. While the authorities were vigilant in prosecuting traders on the long side of the market, their resolve seems to have been non-existent in looking for misdeeds on the short side. The CFTC mandated halt in silver buying, but not selling, also led to the U.S. government bailing out the Hunt Brothers' lenders with taxpayer money to the tune of $1 billion.

Warren Buffett also bought a large amount of silver around 1997. He purchased 20% of global supply, but took delivery of the physical metal and stored it in a warehouse in England. Buffet bought his silver in the UK markets away from the prying eyes of U.S. regulators, or so he thought. U.S. regulators supposedly called up their UK counterparts to find out who was buying so much silver in the British markets and to try to pressure them to stop it. Buffett proved to be a hard person to stop however.

According to a February 25th Financial Times article, 42% of net short silver positions on COMEX were held by four or fewer traders. A similar level of concentration of short positions has been common for a long time. I wonder how would the CFTC react if this amount of concentration existed on the long side of the market?

To find out more about the CFTC hearing on March 25th, you can email them at: questions@cftc.gov, call them at: 202-418-5000, or see their press release at: http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2010/pr5782-10.html.


Disclosure: None

NEXT: Past Recessions Provide Insight Into When the Fed Will Raise Rates

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Toothless CFTC Tries to Bite Gold and Silver

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) announced on January 14th that it was going to investigate trading in the gold and silver markets. This follows the commission's high profile hearings on speculation in the oil and natural gas markets held in the summer of 2009. Those led to the demise of the popular ETF, DXO and caused the natural gas ETF UNG to trade so irregularly that it no longer behaved like an ETF.  Both of these were investment vehicles for the small investor. Big-time speculators went on their merry way untouched and unscathed by the CFTC's action that was supposedly aimed at protecting the public. Anyone who was the least bit cynical might conclude that the CFTC's actual purpose was to protect the profits of the large commercial users of the commodities it regulates.

The CFTC efforts in investing oil and natural gas were in reality a thinly veiled attempt at price controls. Governments almost without exception resort to price controls when inflation becomes a threat. Price controls are of course extremely effective - not in controlling prices, but in creating shortages and driving prices much higher than they would have been if controls hadn't been implemented. Governments never learn however. In the short-term, the CFTC managed to drive natural gas prices to the low levels that were common in the 1990s. Natural gas was already trading at multi-year lows before the CFTC investigations and half of all natural gas rigs in the U.S. had already been shut down. The impact on natural gas was only collateral damage though from the CFTC's real target, which was oil.

Nothing has a greater impact on consumer prices than does oil and governments know that controlling its price is one of the keys to controlling inflation. Around the same time that the U.S. CFTC announced its hearings, the prime minister of England, Gordon Brown, and the president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy made a joint proposal that an international body of government bureaucrats should set the price of oil instead of the free markets. They suggested the price should be kept in the $70 to $80 range. For those who don't recall, Gordon Brown was the British government bureaucrat that sold half the UK's gold for under $300 in 1999 and the early 2000s. Gold has since quadrupled from the price where he sold it, so the UK didn't get that profit. The U.S. dollars that Brown bought from the gold sale then subsequently lost at least 30% of their value. This is the type of market 'genius' that government brings to the table. Would you like to let a government bureaucrat make investing decisions for your 401K?

The CFTC has more ability to impact oil and natural gas than it does gold and silver. ETFs that deal with energy commodities have to do so through some type of futures trading. Oil and natural gas cannot be easily stored as is the case with gold and silver. While there are ETFs for both gold and silver that only trade futures, there are 11 ETFs globally that buy physical gold. None of them store that gold in the United States. They are beyond the reach of the CFTC and the claws of the U.S. government, which for those who don't remember confiscated all of its citizens gold in 1933 and silver in 1934. In aggregate, the gold ETFs have become the sixth largest holder of gold worldwide since the first one was created in March 2003. They hold more gold than China, but less gold than France. In several more years, they could easily have more gold in storage than any central bank.  

Both oil and gold are completely international commodities (natural gas trades in regional markets). If regulation becomes too onerous in the United States, trading can and will shift elsewhere, just as trading in ETFs will shift from those that invest with futures to those that hold physical metal. When the CFTC made its announcement that it would be investigating gold and silver trading, the London Metal Exchange said it would offer clearing for gold over-the-counter (OTC) contracts in London by the second half of 2010. Hong Kong, Singapore, Zurich, Sydney, Tokyo, and Mumbai would probably like to have the trading business too if it leaves the U.S. commodity markets. The CFTC's action is just another government- motivated attempt to prop up the U.S. dollar by trying to hold the price of gold down. It won't work. The CFTC doesn't have the power to make it happen. Prices will eventually have to move to the point that the market dictates, just as they always do. 

Disclosure: Long gold and silver

NEXT: Lessons for Investors from the U.S. Senate Race

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Dollar Down, Everything Else Up

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The trade-weighted dollar hit a new yearly low overnight falling to 75.10 at one point. It only decisively broke important support at 76.00 six trading days ago (there were short breaks before that signaling what was coming). While there is minor support at 74.00, this is not likely to hold very long. A test of the all time low of 71.50 is almost inevitable at this point. It may take a couple of months before this happens. Expect a bounce when it does. How long the U.S. dollar will be able to hold at that level remains to be seen. Eventually, new all time lows will be reached.

The decline in the dollar is causing almost everything else to rise. This includes gold, silver, the stock market, food commodities and now oil. All of these price movements can be traced to the huge money printing operations of the U.S. central bank. Markets move first, then consumer prices second. Expect noticeably rising CPI starting with the report for December. The current rise in oil, which hit $80.05 a barrel for light sweet crude early this morning, has insured the inflation numbers are going to start perking up soon. The rally in grains currently taking place is also going to start impacting food prices sometime next year.

Oil's performance is impressive considering it is taking place against seasonal headwinds and the interference with energy trading that the CFTC conducted this summer. While the CFTC drove 200% long oil ETF DXO out of business, it left the 200% short oil ETF DTO alone. It seems that only leveraged long positions cause excess volatility in energy trading, but leveraged short positions don't. U.S. investors are left with non-leveraged ETFs such as OIL and USO as their only means to invest in oil at the moment. How long the oil rally lasts is still an open question. Higher priced oil definitely upsets the authorities and now that their summer attempt at price controls has failed, you should assume that plan B will appear at some point in the future. Also watch natural gas prices, just as silver usually moves after gold, natural gas can follow oil. Their price ratios are still incredibly out of whack (in theory oil should be 6 times the price of natural gas, it was priced well over 20 times during the summer).

Oil is still far away from its all time high of $147 a barrel (although it will be getting back to that level), while gold keeps hitting new highs. The close of spot gold at the end of the afternoon session of Globex yesterday was $1064.50. To hit another all time high, $1070.40 has to be taken out. Spot silver closed at $17.86 yesterday and needs to break and close above important resistance at 18.00. It has been above $18.00 briefly twice so far (the inverse pattern of the U.S. dollar breaking 76 twice briefly before a major break took place). Once it breaks this level, silver will test its 2008 high around $21. It is only a matter of time.

NEXT: What Earnings Are Telling Us

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Dollar Breaks Support ... Again

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. dollar fell below important support at 76.00 this morning. This is the third break of this level. The low yesterday was 76.02. So far today the trade-weighted dollar has been as low as 75.74 in the pre-market. This is another new yearly low. It will probably be the low for today because it certainly looks like some form of intervention took place to support the dollar when U.S. trading opened. Some weak chart support exists for the dollar at 74.00 and much stronger support around 72.00. The all time low is 71.50.

Market intervention in the U.S. can be seen in the trading of the precious metals as well. Gold was as high as $1068 (a new all time high) in London and then dropped around $10 shortly after trading in New York started. Silver reached a high of $18.02 in London and then dropped a whopping 40 cents after the New York open. Precious metals falling when trading in New York opens is not uncommon. It is in fact a recognized phenomenon that has been going on for decades. Academics studying the issue have concluded that the probability of this long term pattern taking place by chance is essentially zero and that only manipulation in the U.S. markets can explain what is going on. The CFTC, the U.S. regulatory body that is supposed to keep trading on the up and up, of course sees nothing, knows nothing and apparently reads nothing.

Platinum and palladium are less affected by U.S. government dollar manipulation than the monetary precious metals. They are mostly industrial metals which have extensive use in the auto industry. Palladium has been the best performer the last few days, but there is no ETF available in the U.S. to trade it (there is one that trades in London), even though one was announced last April. While the U.S. auto industry is collapsing again after the Cash for Clunkers program expired, this is not the case in China. Auto sales are up almost 84% there year over year. The rapidly growing Chinese car market is now bigger than the faltering U.S. car market. Think about that.

Meanwhile grains have been rallying nicely. Both RJA and GRU were up in the 4% range yesterday. GRU is more volatile and consists only of grains, with beaten down wheat the largest component. RJA is a basket of 20 different agricultural commodities. GRU confirmed a double bottom as a result of yesterday's trading action. Oil was trading around $74 this morning, not much different from the price in late June when we recommended selling DXO. Oil is seasonally weak in the fall and early winter when the precious metals are at their strongest. In the long term, uranium prices are connected to the price of oil, but the correlation can be very loose in the short and intermediate term. Dennison Mines (DNN) had some peculiar price movement Monday with a sharp rise at the close that appeared on the daily charts, but not the intraday charts until this morning. Trading volume was heavy yesterday. This definitely bears watching.

NEXT: Dollar Breaks Down; Nova Gold Breaks Out

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gas Takes Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Natural gas, the commodity, is having one of the most spectacular rallies of all times. It was up 11% yesterday alone. The near term contract hit a low of $2.40 and seems to be heading toward $4.00 (a low estimate of production costs). Even after the spectacular rally of the last few days, Natural gas futures are still in extreme contango. The October contract closed at 3.297 yesterday, while the February contract closed at 5.324. Actions of the commodities regulatory body, the CFTC, and its attempts to limit trading in the natural gas and oil markets have been responsible for natural gas's economically impossible behavior.

The CFTC drove oil ETF DXO out of business and is essentially trying to do the same with natural gas ETF UNG. UNG's price was artificially suppressed by actions of the CFTC and it has ceased to function according to any normal trading rules since this has taken place. An announcement from UNG that it would begin to issue shares on a restricted bases starting September 28th helped stoke yesterday's rally. By the beginning of the summer UNG owned 20% of futures contracts in the natural gas market and the big market players wanted the CFTC to crack down on it. Driving natural gas prices way down is also beneficial to the economy, so the government had a double motivation for interfering in the market.

An alternative ETF, GAZ, has been left alone by the CFTC and more closely reflects price action in the natural gas market. It's price movements are by no means ideal however. GAZ was up 4.5% yesterday, while UNG was up only 2.5%. Neither was up anywhere near 11%. The best performing Natural gas ETF was HZBBF (special thanks to New York Investing meetup member Kim L. for finding this obscure stock). It was up 19% yesterday. HZBBF seems to be the same as Canadian ETF HNU which represents two times natural gas (just as DXO did for oil), but it trades in the U.S. markets.

Natural gas is more subject to manipulation than other commodities because it is sold in regional markets. Unlike oil, it is hard to ship. Historically prices for natural gas are twice as much in Europe and Asia as in the U.S. Government attempts to control prices - and this is what the CFTC action represents - ALWAYS lead to shortages in the future. Natural gas will be no exception. Years from now we will look back and be amazed that natural gas was trading at $2.40 in 2009.

NEXT: Precious Metals Becoming More Precious

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CFTC Kills Off DXO

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

DXO no longer exists. Deutsche Bank announced on September 1st that it would redeem all shares after the market closed on September 9th. DXO was started in June 2008 and had $600 million in assets. It was a investment vehicle that offered hundreds of thousands of small investors a leveraged oil play. Many members of the New York Investing meetup bought it in March and sold it in June of this year and made a 165% profit on this trade. We will not be able to do so again in the future.

The CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission) has been holding hearings this summer to investigate 'speculation' in the oil market. It has specifically targeted ETFs and ETNs in this regard. Deutsche Bank did not directly mention the CFTC in its announcement but said this redemption is the result of “limitations imposed by the exchange” causing a “regulatory event”. How much behind the scenes pressure was put on Deutsche Bank is not known. Deutsche Bank is a holder of U.S. mortgage debt. While it doesn't seem to be on the list of TARP recipients, it did receive approximately $11.8 billion from AIG as a result of the government's nationalization of the company. It can also be assumed that Deutsche Bank benefits from other Fed programs that take junky assets off bank's books and replaces them with higher quality bonds. When the government 'owns you', you are likely to give it what it wants.

It is interesting that the CFTC is concentrating its efforts on 'speculation' from investment entities that are used by small investors. Like the SEC, it hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the large players. For years there have been two large banks that have held large short positions in Silver futures (and Deutsche Bank may be one of those banks). It took years of complaints before the CFTC agreed to investigate, just as the SEC continually ignored complaints about Bernie Madoff and his obvious $65 billion Ponzi scheme. So far, the CFTC has found nothing, just as the SEC never at any point found any wrongdoing on Madoff's part (his Ponzi scheme collapsed on its own accord). If the federal government wanted to limit speculation in the commodities market it could easily have done so, by forcing Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to close down their commodity trading operations. Federal law prohibits banks from speculating in commodities and both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became banks in 2008. The government gave both firms a special five-year dispensation however. If you are a big player, you don't have to worry about 'the rules'.

The government's action in the energy market should be seen for what it is - an attempt at imposing price controls on oil and gas. Price controls never work and almost always lead to shortages and much higher prices. ETFs will not disappear either as a result of the CFTC's action, but will turn into closed-end funds. There will be an attempt to launch more of them. Each one will be smaller, less liquid and have a much higher expense ratio. More will move to overseas markets that are less restrictive. While it is just oil and gas this summer, expect other markets (particularly agricultural) to be affected in the future.

NEXT: The Cash From Clunk-Heads Program

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Natural Gas Deconstructed

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If you think logically, what is happening in the natural gas market will be difficult for you to understand. Markets actually always act rationally however, if you have all the facts available. When they don't seem to be doing so, it is because there is additional information that needs to be considered in order to fully understand what is taking place. In these circumstances you need to think about what could be taking place behind the scenes that could explain what is going on.

The natural gas storage report was released yesterday and it was bullish. Storage went up 52 BCFs and expectations were they would go up 55 BCFs. Natural gas has been declining for the last 11 days and is a heavily shorted market. So did it go up on bullish news? No, it sold off! The near term futures contract closed at $2.95. This in and of itself makes absolutely no sense and defies all rules in how markets operate. Even more surprising is that the cost of production for natural gas in the U.S. is somewhere around $4 to $5 depending on the source. It was already noted two months ago that 50% of U.S. gas wells had already been shut down because of low prices. Production should be close to collapse at this point.

The natural gas futures market is also in extreme contango (distant future prices much higher than the current futures contract), certainly the most extreme of any market in recent history. And the contango is getting even worse. The average price for natural gas futures between November and March is $5.32. Moreover, the oil/natural gas price ratio went over 24 yesterday. It peaked around 22 in 1990. This is also an historical extreme. When something gets way above (or below) its long term average, it invariably reverts back to the mean over time.

So who's making money off of this? This statement, which I found in an article for futures traders explains it all: "Traders on the future market are able to lock in the difference of over $2 per MMBTUs and cover their risk exposure by storing supplies until next winter." This is a particular boon to the large users of natural gas and these are the people profiting handsomely from the seemingly irrational behavior in the market. Furthermore, all of this has been made possible because of the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), the government regulatory body which is supposed to be keeping the markets honest (and is doing as good a job as the proverbial fox guarding the hen house).

The CFTC announced in June they were planning on reigning in speculation in the market and have been holding hearings this summer. They specifically targeted the UNG ETF as a major source of speculation, even though it is a passive investment vehicle that only buys more natural gas futures in response to investor demand. UNG is also an investment vehicle used by small investors. Along with the SEC, which prevented UNG from issuing news shares for awhile and functioning as an ETF should, the CFTC has tried to cripple UNG's operations. This has allowed the big users of the commodity to drive near term natural gas prices to theoretically impossible levels - and make a killing. Like the SEC and its handling of $65 billion Ponzi Schemer Bernie Madoff (who was investigated several times over a many year period, but no dishonest behavior was ever found), the CFTC hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the big players.

As mentioned in yesterday's blog, there is an alternative to UNG. The ETN GAZ also represents the price of natural gas. While UNG lost 50 cents yesterday, GAZ was up 81 cents at one point, although it closed up only 16 cents. The trading volume on GAZ yesterday was enormous reaching almost 17 times the 200-day average. It looked like investors were dumping UNG to buy GAZ, which as an ETN is not affected by the CFTC's investigations. In theory, an ETF and ETN investing in the same commodity should move not only with the commodity, but by the same percentage amount. GAZ actually went up (and by a lot at one point) when natural gas futures were selling off and UNG was down. Just another indication that all rules of reality have temporarily been suspended in the natural gas market.

NEXT: U.S. Dollar, Stocks, Bernanke and Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Update - EIA, CFTC, and USD

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Light sweet crude fell 5.8% yesterday, a crash level one day drop. The EIA weekly storage report set off the selling. Crude closed at $63.35. It was $3.60 below Brent, a lower quality oil. The CFTC has started hearings this week and traders are claiming that they are completely politically motivated. Their evidence? - the CFTC's own reports. Oil was also damaged by a rising dollar. The dollar was rallying on the 'good news' that the U.S. was printing money to buy its own bonds (no that doesn't make any sense). As has been the case since the beginning of June, when the dollar goes up, everything else went down.

The EIA reported that oil storage was up 5.1 million barrels. Distillates were up 2.1 million barrels, but gasoline stocks fell 2.3 million. The mainstream media reported that distillate stocks were at their highest level in 25 years (take that with a grain of salt). Year over year distillate demand is down 10.7% and jet fuel demand dropped 13.3%. Gasoline demand is up by 0.8% however. At his time of year gasoline is the key demand driver for the oil market.

The CFTC has started its hearings this week trying to track down the evil speculators that have been manipulating the oil market. Interestingly, on Monday the Wall Street Journal reported the CFTC "plans to issue a report next month suggesting speculators played a significant role in driving wild swings in oil prices - a reversal of an earlier CFTC position." On Tuesday, the Journal reported that the CFTC is "updating- but not necessarily reversing - a 2008 report that blamed supply and demand, rather than speculators" for last year's spike in oil prices. So let me summarize this news for you. The CFTC already investigated this subject last year and found that the oil market like every other market operates on supply and demand. Not trusting its own work and the basic laws of economics, it has decided to investigate again. To get to the truth, it is holding hearings. However, before the hearings have even begun and data gathered, a decision was already made to blame speculators in the report that will be issued. At this point, you should be smelling a giant rat the size of Washington, D.C.

I actually don't doubt for a moment that there is speculation driving the price of oil to non-market prices. It's not taking place on the trading floors in New York, London or Singapore however, but from government offices on the Potomoc and Thames. To help clarify this picture, it might be a good idea to change Ben Bernanke's title from Fed Chair to Speculator-in-Chief. At least then, the public would know what he is really up to.

NEXT: Economy is Bad, but GDP Report is OK

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bonds, Bernanke and Immoral Hazard

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. is auctioning off $235 billion in debt this week, which surpasses the $104 billion record set in a week in late June. There is some concern among the participants that foreign demand may be weak - and it probably will be. That doesn't mean the the paper won't be sold. The U.S. will simply print the money to buy it. But don't worry, the mainstream media will as usual assure us that this won't be inflationary even though it has been every other time throughout history.

'No inflation' has been the mantra of the U.S. monetary authories since 2007. One reason that has been cited for the last few days of the stock rally is Bernanke's testimony before Congress last week that the economic recovery is widening (where this is happening I don't know) and it won't likely include inflation. Bernanke also said that there would be no subprime crisis one month before it blew up. He then proceeded to continually misjudge the extent of the problem and mishandle it over and over again. So of course, he knows what he's doing now.

Bernanke also has a town hall meeting in Kansas City on Sunday night to get in touch with the people and to help further misinform them. He was repeatedly asked about the Fed's 'too big to fail' doctrine. His response was that he had to "hold his nose" to rescue such institutions during this crisis. Fortunately, Bernanke isn't Pinocchio or his arm would have had to reach out to the planet Neptune. The 'too big to fail' doctrine was actually established in the U.S. in the early 1980s because of the South American Debt Crisis, when the 17 biggest U.S. commercial banks got into trouble because they had lent substantial amounts of money there. Continental Illinois actually failed in 1984 and was essentially nationalized by the government. The other 16 banks were indirectly bailed out. At that point going forward the big banks knew they could do no wrong. A much bigger bailout was necessary during the Savings and Loan Crisis and a now a much, much bigger bailout has been necessary because of the Credit Crisis (something that Moral Hazard theory predicted would happen). Does the deeply concerned Bernanke have any plans to fix this problem? It doesn't appear so.

The trade-weighted dollar ETF was at 78.50 the last time I checked, just above the 78.33 breakdown point. Something is almost certainly going on behind the scenes. Gold was as high as 956 this morning, but had a sharp drop the moment U.S. trading opened - something that happens over and over and over again. An academic study analyzing the pattern concluded that this could only take place because of market manipulation. The regulatory body CFTC is not likely to hold hearings however even though they recently claimed that they were out to stop market manipulation (it's similar to Bernanke being concerned about bailing out the big banks). Apparently though, they can't find it if it is being done by the big players, just as the SEC couldn't realize that Bernie Madoff was a crook.

NEXT: Durable Damaged Goods

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Is It 1998 All Over Again?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In some ways the market reminds me of 1998. Energy prices had hit a low in the spring and rebounded, but then dropped off again in the summer. Stocks were deteriorating into the summer, but rallied strongly in July for no really good reason. Low prices caused energy production to be curtailed and this eventually led to higher prices for the next 10 years. That scenario is quite likely to repeat itself. Whether or not the stock market collapses in August as it did in 1998 remains to be seen. Is there a contemporary version of Long-Term Capital out there?

The future of oil and natural gas prices is clearly laid out in Schlumberger's earnings report today. Like Halliburton earlier this week, Schlumberger said a sharp drop in natural-gas drilling in North America caused an earnings decline. Drilling in the U.S. and Canada reached a five-year low in recent months and no rebound is likely to take place in the foreseeable future. The reduction in drilling activity has also effected oil and has done so globally. While energy companies have scaled back oilfield activities worldwide, the number of rigs operating in the U.S. oil patch is off roughly 55 percent from last summer. If you also consider that a number of large-scale multi-year projects to increase productivity from declining fields (many of the world's biggest producers) were cancelled when oil prices were at lows in the winter, the future becomes easy to predict. There will be shortages of oil in a year or two. The U.S. is particularly vulnerable to these shortages because our energy production is dropping precipitously. The authorities will be surprised when this happens and they will blame greedy speculators and scheming by foreign producers for causing energy prices to skyrocket when these shortages appear.

As for the stock market, it has been going up no matter what. There has been a 10-day rally as of yesterday - a long time for an uninterupted rally. There was a big move up yesterday on fairly heavy volume. The Nasdaq has also just closed a gap on the weekly charts made last September. On the daily charts the RSI is about to hit the max. According to the mainstream media all of this is taking place because of good earnings. Even a cursory analysis of the earnings reports indicates that earnings are actually in very bad shape however. The earnings news out last night was uniformly bearish, but the European markets still rallied and U.S. stock futures were up this morning. So, it looks like the market goes up no matter what. This only happens when large amounts of liquidity are being poured into the financial system by the authorities. Why are they doing this now is a good question.

Reports have started to appear about how the Credit Crisis is over and the U.S. housing market is recovering. The worst of the Credit Crisis is indeed over, but this however doesn't mean recovery is taking place, nor that the economy is getting better - it isn't. As for housing recovering, this really strains credulity. Once a bubble collapses, it needs to have a long and severe drop to correct the excesses and housing has not gotten anywhere near that point yet. British GDP statistics were out overnight and the economy there shrank 5.6 percent year over year, the biggest drop since quarterly records began. Yeah, things are getting better all right.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Dollar Watch; Bad Earnings are Good; Natural Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While no one was watching, the U.S. dollar got awfully close to its break down point yesterday. The low for the trade-weighted dollar index ETF DXY was 78.58. A drop below 78.33 would be technically negative. Meanwhile, earnings season will be winding down soon and so far the picture is dismal overall and even worse for the financials. You would never know it though, from the mainstream media reports which have been glowing and gushing with good earnings news. Many commodities have started to rally again, with natural gas still being very under priced.

Almost without exception, the large financial companies have had dismal earnings in their banking business, which continues to erode. Trading and accounting gimmicks have made the top line numbers look rosy however. Massive money gifts from the federal government don't hurt either. Imagine if someone deposited $45 billion into your bank account. You would look a lot more financially sound as well. Wells Fargo is out with earnings this morning, with quarterly profit up 47%! Looks good on the surface, although acquiring the giant albatross Wachovia was responsible for much of this. Within the report was the statement, "the bank expects credit losses and nonperforming assets to increase". It is also generally acknowledged that Wells Fargo needs to raise more capital. Even the 'see no evil' government stress test found that it had a $13.7 billion capital shortfall. But hey, earnings are great, except in the bank's banking business of course. For some reason, I think this doesn't make any sense.

Natural gas has been getting a lot of press in the last few days. UNG the natural gas ETF is awaiting approval from the SEC to issue more shares. They already made 300 million additional shares available on May 6th. The CFTC is trying to limit UNG's role in the natural gas market based on excessive speculation driving up prices even though natural gas is trading at a multi-year low. Seems to be rather contradictory. Media reports are filled with commentary from traders and 'experts' about how you should stay away from this market. They rarely if ever point out that natural gas tends to hit some type of low in July. I have yet to see any discussion of the production costs for natural gas and whether the price has fallen below this level. There is every reason to believe this is the case. The number of active U.S. rigs pumping natural gas has fallen to a seven year low of 665 from a peak of 1606 last September 12th. When the market cost gets too close to the production cost for a commodity, production shuts down and this is clearly happening with natural gas.

The dollar will either bounce soon or fall below its break down point and the powers that be will try to then save it. Note that once again that the stock market has been rallying when the dollar has been dropping. Will a government induced dollar rally cause the opposite? We will have to wait and see.

NEXT: Bernanke and Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Non-Stimulating Economic Stimulus Plan

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

President Obama was defending his economic stimulus plan over the weekend in a radio address and in an op-ed piece in the Washington Post. He rejected calls for a new stimulus package. In a really eye popping statement in the Post, Obama stated that his stimulus program "was not expected to return the economy to full health, but to provide a boost that would stop the free fall." Now, that's a real ambitious goal! Left unanswered was, what is being done that is expected to return the economy to full health?

The Obama stimulus plan has a number of components and it is questionable how economically stimulating most of them will be as is. The first phase of $288 billion in tax cuts has mostly been implemented. The result? The U.S. savings rate went up significantly. Those people who didn't save their tax cut money, paid down their personal debt. The money didn't go into the economy. So much for that part of the stimulus plan. Tax cuts for stimulating the economy are more of a Republican idea though. Why they were the cornerstone of a 'change you can believe in' Democratic economic program is a good question.

Other components of the $787 billion stimulus include major increases in Medicaid spending, about $48 billion in highway and bridge construction and billions more to boost energy efficiency, shore up state budgets, and increase educational spending. How increasing Medicaid spending boosts the economy is beyond me. This type of spending is a drag on the economy. Bailing out state governments (the plan is not exactly doing a good job on that one so far based on what is happening in California) also is not going to stimulate the economy. It indeed might keep the economy out of free fall however. As for the alternative energy component of the plan, this is something with long term economic potential, not short term. The Democrats recent attempts to keep energy prices low by having the CFTC manipulate the market are going to undermine this part of the stimulus program because alternative energy will be too relatively expensive to be economically viable. The one component of the plan that would both stimulate the economy in the short term and long term is the money for fixing the U.S. transportation infrastructure. This accounts for only 6% of the plan's spending.

There is also no reason to think that the plan should be having any effect by now anyway. Only $60.4 billion of the non-tax component has been spent so far. As reported in the Wall Street Journal this weekend, the White House isn't changing its goal of spending 70% of the stimulus funds by September 2010 (yes that is 2010, not 2009). And people are wondering why the stimulus plan doesn't seem to be effective so far. I think I have the solution! Money spent next year can't possibly stimulate the economy this year. While this may seem obvious to anyone who isn't in a coma, it seems to have alluded the political establishment in Washington.

We are now in the 20th month of the current recession, which makes it a post World War II record breaker for the U.S. The previous longest recession was 16 months. Based on monthly statistics there is no evidence that the decline is going to stop any time soon. When the negative numbers turn positive is when recovery is taking place, not when they become less negative. Despite this Obama stated in his weekend messages that "unemployment tends to recover more slowly than other measures of economic activity", implying that recovery is taking place overall. This is not happening, things are only get worse at a slower rate. Of course, this is like saying we are sinking into a depression slowly instead of quickly. According to his Washington Post article, this seems to have been Obama's goal. With success like this, who needs failure?

NEXT: Government Sachs - Earnings and Market Manipulation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Energy, Commodities and the U.S. Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Light sweet crude fell below 60 this morning in European trading. It has traded as low as 58.86 pre market. Brent seems to be trading higher, which is unusual since it is a poorer quality oil . This type of price inversion was common in February when oil hit its bottom. While a number of commentators claim 60 is strong support for light sweet crude, there is a Fibonacci retracement around 58 and this is a place where the price could hold. We will have to see. There has been too much selling too fast in the oil market and it is has been based on attempts at government manipulation of the market through the CFTC, not because there is an oversupply of oil as the press continually and inaccurately reports (oil in U.S. storage is actually dropping at a precipitous rate).

While the CFTC has regulatory power over all commodity trading in the U.S., it specifically singled out the energy markets for potential trading restrictions. Even though the alleged reason was speculators were causing high prices, it is planning on investigating the natural gas market even though natural gas is trading at a multi-year low (obviously those speculators are incompetent). The real motivation behind the CFTC's action is that the EFT UNG owns 20% of the futures contracts in the market and this is making the big Wall Street players uncomfortable. Issuance of new shares of UNG were suspended on July 7th because regulatory approval wasn't forthcoming. Without the ability to issue new shares with increasing investor demand, an ETF turns into a de facto closed-end fund. Expect this to eventually happen to every ETF. The vested interests are not going to let small investors hone in on their turf.

Every commodity has had a big sell off during July trading and it can all be traced to the CFTC. Fundamentals have nothing to do with it in the case of oil, gold and silver, so you should assume a reversal back to previous values will take place once this is over. While commodities usually trade inversely to the dollar, there has been no dollar rally. The trade-weighted dollar bottomed in early June at 78.40 and has only gotten about 3 cents above the level at its best since then. It closed under 80 again yesterday. Even this morning though the media was reporting 'oil and gold selling off on higher dollar'. They have reported this same story over and over again. One of the news reports today didn't even have any price quote for the dollar, a violation of basic reporting rules. They know their whole story falls apart if people actually have the facts in front of them.

As for the CFTC, will it be investigating manipulation of the silver market by the two big banks with huge short positions? They have been made aware of this, but like the SEC with Bernie Madoff the CFTC is a hear no evil, see no evil operation when it comes to large Wall Street interests manipulating the commodity markets. That is as long as that manipulation supports the government's desire to help prop up the dollar and the economy with lower gold, silver, and oil prices. Short term manipulation eventually leads to long term problems however. Commodity producers just stop producing when the price gets too low and then shortages result if the price is held down too long. Natural gas is probably priced around that level right now.

NEXT: The Non-Stimulating Economic Stimulus Plan

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Commodity Shortage Disaster in the Making

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The government is planning on doing something about those pesky speculators that keep driving up the price of commodities. Even though this has been tried thousands of times previously and has NEVER worked - and even though we have the example of the complete economic collapse in Eastern Europe that this behavior caused - and even though last falls ban on short selling of financial stocks didn't prevent their prices from falling off a cliff - this will not discourage the U.S government from creating a new mess in the commodities markets. It is true that some people never learn and it appears that many of them get elected to political office or work as regulators.

The CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) announced yesterday that it will hold hearings this month and next to explore the need for government-imposed restrictions on speculative trading in oil, gas and other energy markets (even though natural gas is at a multi-year low and oil is 60% off the high it reached one year ago). The CFTC can also set restrictions for other commodities as well and can change margin requirements for trading (and this is also being bandied about). ETFs, which are used as investing vehicles by small investors, were especially singled out for restrictions.

It has been pointed out that insiders like the floor traders and commodity trading firms in Chicago are unlikely to be impacted by the CFTC proposals that are supposed to be protecting the public and not the industry. For those not paying attention, commodity prices nose-dived before this news was released, not after. Probably just an amazing coincidence and not the insiders getting the word before the public (if you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'd like to sell you). It is quite clear that if anyone gets disadvantaged from changes in CFTC policy, it is meant to be the small investor who relies on ETFs and not the big players.

Political pressure is being put on the CFTC by senators Bernie Sanders, who is a Socialist even though the media describes him as an independent and Bryon Dorgan, the biggest economic ignoramus in congress -and that's really saying something, and congressman Bart Stupak from Michigan who wants lower oil and gas prices to protect the state's auto industry (or what's left of it). Attempts to control oil and gas prices were last tried in the U.S. in the early 1970s when Nixon imposed wage and price controls. Oil producer profits were cut to such an extent that U.S. oil production dropped substantially. The U.S. which had been self-sufficient in oil up to 1969, then became extremely dependent on foreign sources. OPEC was then blamed for the shortages and big price hikes that followed, but it was U.S. policy that made it all possible. Did the government blame itself? Of course not! It was those rapacious speculators and evil foreign forces that made it happen. Historical analysis of past inflations shows very clearly that without exception speculators and foreigners are blamed for inflationary price rises that originate with government printing too much currency and then attempting to limit the mess it engendered with price controls. This scenario has played out hundreds, if not thousands, of times. This time will be no different.

The forces of economics can no more be banned by government action than gravity can be outlawed. So what is likely to happen? Since commodity trading is not limited to the U.S, but large active markets exist in London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore and up and coming Dubai, expect trading to increasingly move to those places. Dubai in fact wants to capture more commodity trading business. When U.S. policy hands this to them on a silver platter, except to hear how those scheming Arabs stole this activity from the U.S. ETFs also exist in the English, Canadian and Australian markets (and some others), that American small investors can get access to. Investment money will simply move out of the U.S. - at least until the government tries to impose capital flow restrictions to prevent this (expect this at some point in the future).

If prices of oil are held down temporarily (and it will only be temporarily) by CFTC restrictions or other government action (yes, this will be coming) you can expect shortages in gasoline, heating oil and diesel. There were long gas lines in the 1970s for good reason. While people had to wait a long time and sometimes could only gets a limited quantity of gas, they still got some gas. Heating oil was in danger of running out in certain places - like Minnesota - as well. Things could get much worse this time, since shortages are the only thing you can rely on from price controls. Even worse, prices always wind up higher than they would have been if the price controls had never been imposed in the first place.

One more piece of advice. In case the U.S. government does decide to outlaw gravity and some politician tells you it's safe to jump off the capital building. Make sure you reply, "You first".

NEXT: Government Price Controls in the Making

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

First Four Trading Days Review

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The message from the markets has been quite clear in the last four trading days. The big money is negative and taking its money out. All indices had significant drops today, leaving the first of the quarter indicator highly negative. Technicals deteriorated even further. About the only thing that was up today was the U.S. dollar, although bonds rallied after today's auction was over. The dollar and bonds should be tanking big time. Oil went down even more and the reason for its decline, natural gas and other commodities has now become clear.

The Dow closed down 161 points today, even further below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages. The 50-day is below the 200-day and both are declining, a typical bear pattern. Nasdaq, the strongest of the averages pierced its 50-day today, closing down 41 points. The S&P fell 18 points and broke and closed below its 200-day today after breaking below its 50-day last Thursday. The Russell 2000 fell 10 points and managed to hold just above its 200-day. All and all, a pretty ugly situation.

Light Sweet crude closed at 62.93, but was even lower during the day. Oil has dropped 12% since last Wednesday. While the media is claiming its because it was overpriced and the economy is bad, this is not the reason (as usual, if the press reports it, you should first assume the explanation is wrong). What has happened is CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) says it wants to crack down on rampant speculation in the energy markets, by imposing position limits for commodities of finite supply (which is every commodity). The commission is planning hearings and is also considering raising margin requirements. One of the major implications of this proposal is that ETFs will have quotas imposed on them. The big money players presumably had the news before the public and shorted into it. Will the CTFC investigate this? Don't hold your breath. The people who are supposed to be stopped from speculating are the small investors like yourself, not the big insiders.

A quote from the CFTC news, "The government's use of free markets via auctions to help find prices for hard-to-sell assets in the financial sector shows how adept supply and demand are at setting values. But when it comes to commodities that people, industries, economies and nations depend on, the susceptibility of free markets to manipulation can prove dangerous". Free markets are indeed dangerous to a government that doesn't like the prices they set because it continually overinflates its currency. So we must save the free markets by destroying them! Huh???

It is interesting that this attempt to control rampant speculation in oil is taking place one year exactly after oil peaked at $147 a barrel and while it is now trading in the 60s. Something doesn't seem to make sense with this picture. This move is effectively an attempt to create price controls on commodities (by a government that is constantly telling us that there is deflation and a big risk of prices falling). The only things price controls are effective in creating is big shortages and black markets. They ultimately cause prices to go higher than they would have. When you can't get any gas for your car two years from now you'll at least know why.

NEXT: Commodity Shortage Disaster in the Making

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.