EU Debt Crisis Spreads Worldwide

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

As the situation in Greece deteriorates further, Moody's announced today that it intended to downgrade 114 European financial institutions and 17 global banks. Hopes that China will buy up   EU sovereign debt to help prop up the faltering eurozone may wind up costing the U.S. more than it does China. 

The hostility between Greece and the EU/IMF/ECB bailout troika is palpable. Nevertheless, there are claims that a deal should be reached by Monday. Whether the severe budget cuts demanded will actually be implemented is another story. Greece's GDP is shrinking 7% this year and additional budget cuts will only make the situation worse. Athens is already riot torn and elections in April (assuming a democratic government still exists) are not likely to produce a government favorable to the bailout terms. The market remains increasingly skeptical of Greece's near-term future with one-year government bond yields reaching 528% today.

While all attention is focused on Greece, the European debt crisis permeates the continent. Banks have lent too much money to not just Greece, but to Portugal, Spain, Italy and Eastern European countries as well. There is a still a hangover of pre-Credit Crisis debt that wasn't resolved in 2008, but merely papered over with newly printed money. Moody's just announced it was planning on downgrading 114 European financial entities including 7 in Germany, 9 in Great Britain, 10 in France and over 20 each in Spain and Italy. Global banks Nomura and Bank of America are in line for a one-notch downgrade, while Barclays, BNP Paribas, Credit Agricole, Deutsche Bank, HSBC Holdings and Goldman Sachs could have their ratings lowered two notches. UBS, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley could be reduced three notches.

China with its vast foreign reserve holdings has been considered the potential savior of the eurozone. If this does occur, it won't be only China that is paying however; the U.S. will be sacrificing as well. China has previously announced it wants to diversify its reserve holdings. Since a disproportionate amount of these are in U.S. treasuries, the obvious implication is that it will be funding less U.S. debt as it funds more EU debt. The most recent figures for November 2011 indicate that China decreased its U.S. debt security holdings by almost 3%.

The EU debt crisis is likely to be us for some time to come. The situation with Greece is not stable and at some point it will have to leave the eurozone. Attention will increasingly focus to the other debt-ridden countries and the weak banking system. Just as the crisis spread from Greece throughout Europe, it will then spread from Europe to the rest of the world. We are already seeing this happen.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Rumbles as Dollar Crumbles

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If the U.S. dollar chart was a person, it would be a stroke victim. The trade-weighted dollar has been falling since March and can't seem to rise for more than a few days before falling down again. The dollar's latest rally (triumphed by the American mainstream media) in the second half of October took it from 75 to just below 77 where it bounced down from its rapidly declining 50-day moving average. After a major gap down on Monday, instead of rallying strongly to fill the gap, the dollar remained comatose. It broke the 75 level decisively this morning trading as low as 74.77. This is another 18-month low. Comments by Fed officials on Tuesday led to the latest round of selling.

In contrast to the dollar chart, the gold chart looks like someone training for the Olympics. Gold hit another all time record high this morning. Spot gold traded as high as $1117.60 and spot silver as high as $17.71 so far. Technically speaking gold is in a textbook perfect breakout from a solid 18-month base, which is over 300 points deep. A technician would expect the rally to be at least the depth of the base. In a bullish market, double the depth is quite possible. Since the breakout took place at $1025, this would take gold to the $1300 or $1600 level. Gold is in a seasonally strong period until next March, so the rally should last until around then before a significant pause would be needed.

Gold is rising on the flood of liquidity that is being pumped into the global financial system. The same flood of liquidity is drowning the U.S. dollar. A number of Federal Reserve officials made comments Tuesday about U.S. employment likely continuing for a long time and the need for the Fed to maintain super low interest rates. In an eye popping comment, the Dallas Fed president acknowledged that the easy money was damaging the dollar, but he was unconcerned as long as the decline was orderly. So as long as the U.S dollar collapses slowly instead of suddenly, everything is fine. This is the wisdom from the people in charge folks.

The economic geniuses at the Fed are not worried about inflation, as is also the case across the pond in the other quantitative easing powerhouse, the Bank of England. There is no case in history where significant excess money creation didn't lead to inflation, but why be bothered by historical fact. How excessive the money creation is this time is indicated by a gauge kept by Morgan Stanley which measures the amount of cash circulating in the global economy as a percent of total economic activity. It is at a record high by far. Of course, you don't need complex money measures to determine if there is inflation. Gold has been the inflation thermometer throughout the ages and it indicates quite clearly that inflation is heating up.

Disclosure: Long gold, silver. No positions in the U.S. dollar.

NEXT: Action Speaks Louder than Words for U.S. Dollar

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CFTC Kills Off DXO

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

DXO no longer exists. Deutsche Bank announced on September 1st that it would redeem all shares after the market closed on September 9th. DXO was started in June 2008 and had $600 million in assets. It was a investment vehicle that offered hundreds of thousands of small investors a leveraged oil play. Many members of the New York Investing meetup bought it in March and sold it in June of this year and made a 165% profit on this trade. We will not be able to do so again in the future.

The CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission) has been holding hearings this summer to investigate 'speculation' in the oil market. It has specifically targeted ETFs and ETNs in this regard. Deutsche Bank did not directly mention the CFTC in its announcement but said this redemption is the result of “limitations imposed by the exchange” causing a “regulatory event”. How much behind the scenes pressure was put on Deutsche Bank is not known. Deutsche Bank is a holder of U.S. mortgage debt. While it doesn't seem to be on the list of TARP recipients, it did receive approximately $11.8 billion from AIG as a result of the government's nationalization of the company. It can also be assumed that Deutsche Bank benefits from other Fed programs that take junky assets off bank's books and replaces them with higher quality bonds. When the government 'owns you', you are likely to give it what it wants.

It is interesting that the CFTC is concentrating its efforts on 'speculation' from investment entities that are used by small investors. Like the SEC, it hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the large players. For years there have been two large banks that have held large short positions in Silver futures (and Deutsche Bank may be one of those banks). It took years of complaints before the CFTC agreed to investigate, just as the SEC continually ignored complaints about Bernie Madoff and his obvious $65 billion Ponzi scheme. So far, the CFTC has found nothing, just as the SEC never at any point found any wrongdoing on Madoff's part (his Ponzi scheme collapsed on its own accord). If the federal government wanted to limit speculation in the commodities market it could easily have done so, by forcing Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to close down their commodity trading operations. Federal law prohibits banks from speculating in commodities and both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became banks in 2008. The government gave both firms a special five-year dispensation however. If you are a big player, you don't have to worry about 'the rules'.

The government's action in the energy market should be seen for what it is - an attempt at imposing price controls on oil and gas. Price controls never work and almost always lead to shortages and much higher prices. ETFs will not disappear either as a result of the CFTC's action, but will turn into closed-end funds. There will be an attempt to launch more of them. Each one will be smaller, less liquid and have a much higher expense ratio. More will move to overseas markets that are less restrictive. While it is just oil and gas this summer, expect other markets (particularly agricultural) to be affected in the future.

NEXT: The Cash From Clunk-Heads Program

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CIT - Last Minute Reprieve

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In a last minute development, commercial lender CIT has secured a $3 billion bailout from its bondholders thereby saving the company from filing for bankruptcy protection - at least for the moment. The rescue includes a $3 billion loan which is not due until 2.5 years from now. $2 billion is going to be committed immediately and another billion is to become available within 10 days. The bailout is supposedly taking place without government intervention (and the moon is made of green cheese). The media is trumpeting that this represents a new phase of the financial crisis and indicates how much things are improving. Don't believe it for a moment.

CIT is going to restructure its debt. Lenders are trying to get $825 for each $1000 worth of notes. There is a billion worth of senior notes alone. The company has established a steering committee of bondholders that will work on drawing up a number of debt swap offers designed to alleviate CIT's debt burden and further shore up the company's cash position. A question everyone should be asking is who are the people who are going to put the money up for this and what is their relationship with the Fed and U.S. Treasury.

Meanwhile a report is out that some of the biggest recipients of TARP bailout funds, including Bank of America and Morgan Stanley, increased their spending on lobbying in the second quarter as Congress began to look closely at revamping the rule system for financial institutions. Fortunately, members of congress aren't known to be for sale. Their votes are another story however.

NEXT: Bernanke Says Not to Worry - You Should Worry

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CIT DOA; Liquidity Injections Rally Market?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The market had a great rally yesterday with almost all asset classes going up. This started a few days ago with the Goldman Sachs (aka Government Sachs) rally. Morgan Stanley beat expectations this morning. The Goldman rally took place BEFORE the good news was released and if yesterday was at least partially a Morgan Stanley rally, it happened before the news came out also. Don't worry though, the government announced many times last week that it was going to crack down on illicit speculation in the markets. If you had trouble not laughing when reading that last sentence, it's not surprising. There is no need to write parody, when you have the mainstream media reporting news like that.

The lack of memory on the markets part seems to be truly amazing. The no longer in existence Bear Stearns was about to announce good earnings in March 2008. The only thing that prevented it from doing so was the company went under before it could tell the world how much money it was making. This would seem to indicate to anyone with even the most minimal thinking ability that the earnings of these big Wall Street firms are meaningless. But hey, this happened last year. Traders, like government officials, don't let themselves get bogged down with the past. After all, it's not like history repeats itself.

It would not be unreasonable to assume that the market is rallying so much in the last few days because a lot of money is being pumped into the financial system. That the U.S. dollar is going down, while everything else is going up (a common pattern in market rallies since the beginning of June) supports this view. Now what could possibly be behind that? Probably the imminent failure of CIT, a lender to one-million small to medium size businesses. After giving CIT $2.3 billion in TARP funds, the U.S. government has decided to pull the plug. CIT is apparently not too big to fail (meaning that it doesn't have a lot of former alumni in highly placed positions in Washington, D.C.). Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, part of the tweedledum and tweedledumber team of Geithner and Bernanke, is personally handling the situation.

If there is any historical analogy to CIT's failure it is the Bank of United States, actually a local New York City bank despite the name, failure in December 1930. This bank lent to lots of small and medium size business, but only in the New York metro area, whereas CIT lends nationally. The Fed refused to bail out the Bank of the United States and thought the repercussions would be minimal. Instead, the demise of the Bank of the United States set off the first of three major waves of bank failures that lasted more than two years and which wiped out a large part of the U.S banking system. But that was back in the 1930s when U.S. financial officials didn't have the slightest idea what they were doing. Instead today we have ever on the ball Fed Chair Ben Bernanke who in March 2007 said, "the problems in the subprime market would only reduce somewhat the effective demand for housing” and then followed that up in May 2007 with “given the fundamental factors in place that should support the demand for housing, we believe the effect of the troubles in the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited”. Bernanke saw no potential ill effects on the broader economy right up until June 2007. A few weeks later everything fell apart.

NEXT: Bank Profits Soar Even Though Business is Bad

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bank(rupt) of America Gets Government Bailout

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

This morning, only hours after getting another major infusion of bailout cash from the U.S. government, Bank of America reported its first quarterly loss in 17 years. The latest bailout became necessary because Bank of America's government arranged takeover of money- hemorrhaging Merrill Lynch (this took place after Bank of America's takeover of money- hemorrhaging Countrywide Financial). This time, it is at least being admitted that taxpayers are getting stuck with the loss. Things were so bad, that the government didn't even try to lie about. The Fed and Treasury weren't just busy with Bank of America last night either, but put the final touches on the latest scheme to keep Citigroup afloat.

While Citigroup has been struggling for survival for some time now, Bank of America was one of the few big banks and brokers that seemed t0 be getting along well enough despite the Credit Crisis. The loss of $1.79 billion, or 48 cents per share it reported today is small compared to the fourth-quarter net loss of $8.29 billion, or $1.72 per share, for Citigroup (its fifth quarterly loss in a row, but better than the $1.99 loss in the fourth quarter of 2007). However, Bank America's proposed acquisition Merrill Lynch lost a whopping $15.31 billion, or $9.62 per share, last quarter and things looked bad enough to potentially drag both companies into oblivion. Bank of America management claimed it didn't realize that Merrill's loses would be so high (makes you wonder just how accurate their loan analysis is - no wonder they thought sub-prime borrowers were good credit risks) threatened to KO the deal if the government didn't pay up.

The Treasury coughed up another $20 billion of TARP funds immediately. To this, they added a rescue package with the government agreeing to share in losses on $118 billion in residential and commercial mortgages, derivatives and corporate debt. Bank America will absorb the first $10 billion of losses, the government the next $10 billion, and the government 90 percent of the rest. Why taxpayers should get stuck paying off this debt is beyond me. Even worse, there will probably be more to pay down the road.

The Treasury was also busy coming up with a new idea for saving the beyond insolvent Citigroup. After more than a half-dozen bailouts since late 2007, the bank is still at risk of crumbling . The latest scheme is to split it into two businesses, Citicorp and Citi Holdings. Citicorp, will focus on traditional banking, while Citi Holdings will be the dumping ground for the company's riskier assets. CitiHoldings will account for $850 billion of Citigroup's $1.95 trillion in assets including CitiMortgage and CitiFinancial. It will also be in charge of Citi's 49 percent stake in the joint brokerage with Morgan Stanley, and the pool of about $300 billion in mortgages and other risky assets that the U.S. government agreed to backstop late last year. Citi's new structure is an almost complete reversal of the financial supermarket approach it adopted in the late 1990s and which everyone on Wall Street thought was one of the best ideas ever (so much for that). The company isn't out of the woods yet either. The fourth quarter earnings report showed that credit deterioration was severe from North America to Europe to Latin America to Asia.

NEXT: Inaguaration Day 2009 - Looking for a New Beginning

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Five Year Lows are Bad, Eleven Year Lows are Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

On Wednesday the Dow hit a five year low. Yesterday the S&P500 broke its key long term support around 775 to hit an eleven year low. The import of this event should not be underestimated. The market sell off that began in the spring of 2000 and which first ended after two and a half years has now been extended to eight and a half years - at least for the S&P500. The Dow and Nasdaq have still not broken their 2002 lows, but the Dow is close to doing so and this would represent another violation of key support that would have ugly implicatons for future stock prices. The Nasdaq is holding well above this support level, but this provides scant comfort considering that that this represents an approximately 78% drop from its 2000 high.

The market statistics for this year alone are already devastating enough. After Thursday's drop the Dow Jones is down 43%, the S&P 500 49% and the Nasdaq 50% in less than eleven months. The S&P's drop matches the one that took two entire years in the crushing market sell off in 1973/74. As of now, it is worse than the 47% drop in 1931 - the year with the biggest drop in stock prices during the Great Depression. All the U.S. indicies had crash level drops once again yesterday, but in an unusal pattern the S&P fell the most with a 6.7% loss and the Nasdaq the least with a 5.1% drop. For the record the closing prices were 7552 on the Dow, 752 on the S&P 500, 1316 on the Nasdaq and 385 on the Russell 2000.

Financial stocks bore the brunt of the selling with Citigroup losing 24% after a 23% loss the day before. Citi closed at 4.71 even after (or possibly because) Saudi prince Al-Waleed said he would raise his stake in the bank back to 5% (this was the amount he has held for many years and if he has to buy to get back to this level, he has obviously been selling recently). Citi announced this morning that it was considering auctioning off the firm in parts or selling itself wholesale. It also requested the SEC ban short selling on its stock again. JP Morgan was damaged almost as much as Citi, with a 18% decline and Bank America did a little better dropping only 14%. GE was down 11%. Morgan Stanley and Goldman fell 10% and 6% respectively. While Goldman did a little better at the close, its intraday low at 49.00 was a much bigger drop. Morgan Stanley fell back into the single digits. So much for TARP, the Wall Street welfare bill, that was supposed to save the financial system from a meltdown.

Wiffs of panic in the financial system were palpable yesterday. The VIX (the volatility index) closed over 80. Interest rates on 3-month T-bills fell to 0.1% in flight to safety buying. A little better than the brief negative interest rate on the 1-month T-bill reached awhile ago, but not by much. Oil continued its relentless decline, falling to $49.42 a barrell. Weekly jobless claims spiked to a 16 year high of 542,000, with continuing claims the highest since 1982 (less than half of employed workers in the U.S. are eligible for unemployment by the way, so you may want to double all numbers to get a more realistic picture of the U.S. employment situation). One market commentator ventured that the current slowdown could be the "worse since the Great Depression". Perhaps he should have used the word than.

NEXT: The Citi that Should be Put to Sleep

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Next Banks and Brokers to Cash Out

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Videos Related to this Blog:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQsTk6SaTJ8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfpE0wAz-nA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIxTlP5FU_Q

The New York Investing meetup first predicted a major broker failure, Bear Stearns, in August 2007. Bear went under in March. The bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was predicted in December 2007. They both had to be bailed out this July and then taken over by the government in September. In April 2008, our list of the dirtiest dozen financial companies included AIG, Lehman, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, IKB Deutsche Industriebank, Merrill Lynch and Washington Mutual (see 'Night of the Living Fed' at http://investing.meetup.com/21/files). Lehman and Washington Mutual, Merrill Lynch and Wachovia led our list of 'The Banks and Brokers Most Likely to Fail' in September. All of these banks and brokers no longer exist as independent companies, if they exist at all.

While the next wave of failures could include Morgan Stanley (on the April list), it will mostly consist of regional banks. When the market crashed on Monday, regionals were some of the worst hit of all stocks. Many are dependent on the Wall Street bailout bill to keep them in operation. Without it, a number will fail in the near future, with it, they will fail in the not so near future. Top of the list in the next round of the insolvency sweepstakes is National City (NCC), which dropped 63% on Monday after falling 25% on Friday. Management insists everything is fine even though the stock price looks like it could soon be negative and vultures have started circling the branches of the bank. After National City, Sovereign (SOV) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) took some of the biggest hits, dropping 32% and 20% respectively. Fifth Third was on our September list. Sovereign would have been included if we had added one more bank.

The full list of regional banks and brokers that we considered most troubled (we only looked at banks with a market cap over $1 billion) in September is:

•E*Trade (ETFC)
•Corus Bankshares (CORS)
•First Horizon (FHN)
•National City (NCC)
•Provident Bankshares (PBKS)
•Colonial BancGroup (CNB)
•Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)
•Regions Financial (RF)
•Zions Bancorp (ZION)
•Huntington Bancshares (HBAN)

While these banks are sizeable, they are not 'too big to fail' like a Citibank or UBS. If some form of the Wall Street bailout bill passes then these banks will have a lifeline thrown to them. That lifeline may prove to be fairly short however.

NEXT: Short Selling Democracy - Senate Resurrects Bailout Bill

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Central Bank Liquidity Tsunami Returns

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our video related to this posting:

After Lehman declared bankruptcy on the Monday the 15th, Merrill Lynch had to be taken over by Bank America and AIG was nearing its end, the market was looking for a rate cut from the Fed during its Tuesday meeting. The Fed and Treasury had conditioned the market to expect bailouts for financial firms and then failed to deliver when they didn't rescue Lehman and grant AIG its initial loan request of $40 billion. The Fed failed to deliver again when it didn't cut the funds rate. This seeming policy reversal, refusing to support failing financial firms with loan guarantees and the stock market with rate cuts, not surprisingly started a huge market sell off.

The Fed started pumping money into the financial system at the rate of $70 billion a day on Monday and Tuesday. While this was well above normal, it was by no means adequate for the financial crisis that was unfolding. Not only did the Dow go down 45o points and gold go up $90 on Wednesday, but the bond market indicated a panic flight to quality. For a brief time, interest rates on 1-month T-bills became negative. The rates on 3-month T-bills remained barely positive at 0.2%, the lowest level since 1954. The TED spread a measure of financial system stability, or lack thereof, hit the level it reached during the crash of 1987.

The Fed's apparent obliviousness to the magnitude of the situation was truly mind boggling, but not inconsistent with Bernanke's previous missteps - after all he didn't expect the subprime crisis would have any serious impact on the market as of June 2007, if not later. After the market route on Wednesday, along with Morgan Stanley acting as if it was about to go under, the Fed decided to flood the world financial system with liquidity. It supplied a line of credit of as much as $247 billion to the ECB, Bank of England, Bank of Japan, the Swiss National Bank and the Bank of Canada. These banks in turn added their own funds and a gusher of money poured forth from every central bank spigot available. As one observer noted, the central banks were essentially providing unlimited liquidity to world financial markets. Not surprisingly, stock markets reacted positively everywhere with big rallies, with the Dow being up 410 points and the Nasdaq up 100 points on Thursday.

Euphoria from liquidity injections usually lasts only a short time, unless the underlying problems get fixed. In this case, the problems may be even worse than the market realized. The Fed's delayed reaction to the market turmoil and its initial cold shoulder to AIG may not have been voluntary, it may have had no choice. On Wednesday, the Fed asked the U.S. Treasury to raise money on its behalf by selling bonds and by Thursday it had received $160 billion from this operation. The Fed has never made this request from the Treasury before. While the official explanation for doing so was to help with its cash management, this is highly unlikely. More plausible is that the Fed itself has run out of money and is being secretly bailed out. Events that took place Thursday evening lent further credence to this belief.

NEXT: The Free Market Goes Under

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Sovereign Wealth Funds Bail Out the Banks

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

As the credit crisis unfolded in the fall of 2007, a number of big banks and brokerage houses were desperate for capital - far more desperate than was ever admitted publicly. While they needed large cash infusions to continue operating, a number of sovereign wealth funds in the oil-rich Gulf and the Far East had swollen coffers of dollars that they needed to place somewhere. It was therefore almost inevitable that some of the first bailouts (an insolvent financial institution requires multiple bailouts) of struggling financial institutions would be done by sovereign wealth fund purchases. By the end of 2007, it was estimated that these funds would make at least $37 billion of investments in Western financial companies.

The idea of foreign investment as a means of providing capital was not a completely new one. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal of Saudi Arabia had purchased 5% of Citibank (then Citigroup) when it was reeling from the Savings and Loan Crisis in the early 1990s. Earlier in 2007, China purchased a $3 billion stake in Blackstone's IPO, which debuted just before the collapse of the private equity bubble and promptly plummeted in price. By November, Abu Dhabi had bought a 4.9% stake in Citibank for $7.5 billion. At the time of the purchase, rumors were circulating on Wall Street that Citi might be insolvent. U.S. government officials admitted being involved in the transaction, which begs the question as to whether or not they would have allowed the deal to go through if it wasn't absolutely necessary for Citibank's survival.

In early December, the Government of Singapore Investment corporation got 9% ownership in UBS for a little less than $10 billion and an unnamed middle eastern investor (thought to be Oman) bought a 2% stake. China then bought a 9.9% stake in Morgan Stanley only days before Christmas. Singapore's Temasek Holdings then helped bail out Merrill Lynch on December 24th. By mid-January, Citibank was already in need of a second bailout by the sovereign wealth funds, only two months after the first one had taken place. The Government of Singapore, the Kuwait Investment Authority and Price Alwaleed were part of a $12.5 billion capital infusion for which they got some ownership of the bank in return. On the same day, only weeks after its first cash infusion from a sovereign wealth fund, Merrill Lynch received an additional $6.6 billion from parties including the Kuwait Investment Authority and the Korean Investment Corp.

None of these deals had to undergo scrutiny by the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment, which only examines whether acquisitions by overseas buyers compromise national security when their stakes rise above 10%. Given the large number of sovereign wealth funds and wealthy individuals in the Gulf States and Far East, it would be possible for their aggregate ownership to reach 100% without a review ever taking place.

Next: Government Investment Pools Dry Up

Daryl Montgomery

Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about the New York Investing meetup, please go to our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21