CFTC's March 25th Hearings on the Metals Markets

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The CFTC (Commodities Future Trading Commission) held hearings on March 25th on whether to set controls on metal's trading in the U.S. futures markets. A representative from CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) testified that the CFTC's attempt to put hard limits on speculative activity in the U.S. metals markets is an attempt by the government oversight agency to overstep its bounds. A spokesman for HSBC claimed that limits on metal trading were simply unnecessary. The CFTC itself said it continues to look into allegations of market manipulation in the silver market in the summer of 2008.

The CFTC has previously held hearings on setting trading limits in energy and agricultural commodities. One of the reasons that the CFTC claims it needs to set position limits in trading is because of the finite supply of any commodity. The limits are supposedly protecting the market (from itself apparently) and the CFTC claims that government bureaucrats know more about how trading should be done than market participants. While there are actual glaring examples of how the gold and silver markets are manipulated by the big players, these are rarely on the CFTC's agenda. Like the other major market regulatory body, the SEC, the CFTC just doesn't seem to notice the behavior from the big money insiders that really distorts the market. For instance, CFTC hearings last summer on energy focused on ETF UNG, which held 20% of natural gas futures contracts. Even though this was an investment vehicle heavily used by small investors, the CFTC decided it was a danger to the integrity of the markets, as opposed to the trading activities of the big banks and hedge funds. The SEC took the same approach by paying limited attention to Bernie Madoff's $65 billion investment scam for almost two decades, but during the same period was very likely to use its resources to investigate some dentist in New Jersey who suspiciously bought a 1000 option contracts and made a couple of bucks.

The CFTC's concerns with energy and agricultural trading are obviously politically motivated. Politicians want to keep the prices of these commodities down since they are necessities and the source of destabilizing inflation. The UK prime minister and French president actually wrote a widely circulated article about how energy prices need to be determined by the big government's of the world just before the CFTC's energy hearings last summer. The U.S. had price controls on energy commodities in the early 1970s and the results were long lines at gas stations and fuel shortages. Under pricing in the markets always leads to trouble down the road.

The excuse for the CFTC considering limits on metal trading is even less justified than for energy or agriculture. As the HSBC representative pointed out, metals are not wasting assets that are consumed and then no longer available as is the case for oil and food commodities. Metals get recycled. Almost all of the gold that has ever been mined is still thought to be in existence. Higher prices increase the recycling rate and bring more supply to market, so the markets for gold and silver are self-correcting. While 50% of silver is used for industrial purposes, only 13% of gold is employed for manufacturing practical items. Most gold is used to make jewelry. Does the gold market need to be controlled, so the rich can be assured of getting good prices on holiday presents?

The CFTC is also not looking at where the actual manipulation is taking place in the gold market. This is done through central bank leasing to the large banks and hedge funds. They lease the gold for a small price and then can sell it on the market to raise some quick cash. This activity held down the price of gold in the 1990s and the early 2000s. The price of gold rose as leasing activity diminished. Artificially lowering the price of a commodity doesn't seem to come under the definition of market manipulation as far as the CFTC is concerned. Central banks, large international banks and big hedge funds also seem to be citizens above suspicion as Madoff was for the SEC.

While the CFTC is looking into manipulation into the silver markets, it may not mean that much. This is probably happening because silver investor Ted Butler has worked tirelessly to bring the situation to the public's attention, thereby putting some heat on the agency. How much the CFTC actually looks this time has yet to be determined. The SEC investigated Madoff many times, but just couldn't discover his blatantly obvious crooked activities. For some time, two big banks have frequently had huge short positions in silver futures -seemingly bigger than the Hunt Brother's who were convicted on federal charges on manipulating the silver prices in the 1980s. The CFTC has already investigated silver twice before in the 2000s and didn't find any irregularities. The SEC investigated Madoff more than two times.

Steve Sherrod, acting director of surveillance at the CFTC’s division of market oversight noted in today's hearings that when Comex silver prices fell sharply in the summer of 2008 that there was no significant change in the total long or short positions in the commitment of traders’ positions in the agency’s weekly data. Nor was there a significant change in open interest during the period of July and August 2008. Sherrod tried to explain away this seeming impossibility by stating, “One could explain a change in short open interest on the BPR (bank participation report) by a change within the classification system; if the usage code changed from non-bank to bank for a trader with a short position, then an increase in the short open interest would appear on the BPR, without any change in the COT (commitment of traders) Report. Another explanation would be a merger or acquisition where a bank assumes the position of a non-bank entity, both of whom were under the same commercial classification. That may not result in a change in open interest and may not result in a change in aggregate position within a COT classification. But it may result in an increase in the reported position on the BPR.”  Readers should carefully note Sherrod's wording (and language that seems more geared to hide what is going on than to clearly explain it). While this may have been what happened, Sherrod indicates that it also may not have been what happened. So how does this enlighten us?

The small investor shouldn't expect much, if anything, from the CFTC. It is realistically a government body that uses its powers to protect the big money interests, although it will claim that whatever it does is to benefit the public. Markets can also not be controlled without serious negative consequences. Government's have attempted to do so hundreds of times throughout the ages and it has never worked. Most commodity trading is international as well (natural gas is an exception), so restrictions in trading in the U.S. means that business will just move overseas. In this doesn't happen quickly enough, shortages will appear. You will have the CFTC to thank for them when they do.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Euro Zone Support Package Doesn't Solve the Problem

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Sells Off as Dollar Rallies...As Usual

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. dollar is rallying today for a change. Yesterday DXY, the ETF that represents it, fell as low as 75.83, below key support at 76.00. As of this moment DXY is 76.73. There is strong resistance at 78.00. The key breakdown level is 78.33, which was the multi year low made during the dollar sell off in the late 1980s and early 1990s. For the last two years the U.S. dollar has usually illogically rallied the day after the Fed meeting. There is also danger that some statement will come out of today's G20 meeting about the desire for a stronger dollar. If this happens, the talk is unlikely to be met with any action.

Gold was strong first thing in the morning, but sank to below a $1000 as trading progressed. Silver was selling off even more and may have resolved its overbought condition. The key breakout level for gold is $1003.50. It has closed above this level eight days in a row. So far, it doesn't look like today will be the ninth.

A number of gold and silver stocks have gaps made approximately ten trading days ago. These gaps may have to be filled. Nova Gold (NG) filled this gap four days ago. It was trying to test it today. It is not unusual for a stock's price to fall somewhat below the bottom of a gap. This is frequently a very profitable buy point. Nova Gold has made a cup and looks like it is making a handle. Many gold and silver miners' charts have similar patterns.

About the only thing up in today's market is UNG. The Natural Gas report seemed bearish this morning. GAZ is down. Both UNG and GAZ should move together, but they don't. HZBBF, introduced in this blog 2 weeks ago now trades under another ticker symbol: HNUZF (special thanks to New York Investing member Joyce K. for first reporting the change). The new trading symbol can't be found on Big Charts yet. The symbol changed after a 5 to 1 reverse split. This split and the symbol change make no sense whatsoever. Both have made it much harder for the individual investor to trade natural gas. Perhaps that the idea.

NEXT: So Much for That Recovery

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gas Takes Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Natural gas, the commodity, is having one of the most spectacular rallies of all times. It was up 11% yesterday alone. The near term contract hit a low of $2.40 and seems to be heading toward $4.00 (a low estimate of production costs). Even after the spectacular rally of the last few days, Natural gas futures are still in extreme contango. The October contract closed at 3.297 yesterday, while the February contract closed at 5.324. Actions of the commodities regulatory body, the CFTC, and its attempts to limit trading in the natural gas and oil markets have been responsible for natural gas's economically impossible behavior.

The CFTC drove oil ETF DXO out of business and is essentially trying to do the same with natural gas ETF UNG. UNG's price was artificially suppressed by actions of the CFTC and it has ceased to function according to any normal trading rules since this has taken place. An announcement from UNG that it would begin to issue shares on a restricted bases starting September 28th helped stoke yesterday's rally. By the beginning of the summer UNG owned 20% of futures contracts in the natural gas market and the big market players wanted the CFTC to crack down on it. Driving natural gas prices way down is also beneficial to the economy, so the government had a double motivation for interfering in the market.

An alternative ETF, GAZ, has been left alone by the CFTC and more closely reflects price action in the natural gas market. It's price movements are by no means ideal however. GAZ was up 4.5% yesterday, while UNG was up only 2.5%. Neither was up anywhere near 11%. The best performing Natural gas ETF was HZBBF (special thanks to New York Investing meetup member Kim L. for finding this obscure stock). It was up 19% yesterday. HZBBF seems to be the same as Canadian ETF HNU which represents two times natural gas (just as DXO did for oil), but it trades in the U.S. markets.

Natural gas is more subject to manipulation than other commodities because it is sold in regional markets. Unlike oil, it is hard to ship. Historically prices for natural gas are twice as much in Europe and Asia as in the U.S. Government attempts to control prices - and this is what the CFTC action represents - ALWAYS lead to shortages in the future. Natural gas will be no exception. Years from now we will look back and be amazed that natural gas was trading at $2.40 in 2009.

NEXT: Precious Metals Becoming More Precious

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Dollar,Stocks,Bernanke and Natural Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. dollar fell below its breakdown point again on Friday. DXY, the ETF for the trade-weighted dollar, closed at 78.01 and spent much of the day trading in the 77 range. This is the second time the dollar has traded below the key breakdown point of 78.33. Last time it was below this price for 5 days. It's inability to stay above this level is a sign of weakness. Gold of course rallied and was as high as $957 during the day. It is once again trying to get back to the important $1000 breakout level.

As the dollar fell, stocks rallied. This has been a typical pattern since this March. In the larger scheme of things it is unusual however. For the first time since this phase of the rally began in July, volume was noticeably above average (average volume has been declining during the entire rally however). The rally has looked sickly so far because volume started out light and continually fell - a very negative pattern. It seems that if stocks rally, the U.S. dollar has to sell off and vice-a-versa. Something has to give soon.

What fueled the rally on Friday was existing home sales supposedly being up 7% and bullish comments by Ben Bernanke about how the recession is ending. The home sales figures are of course suspicious, but no amount of fantasy has managed to disturb the market rally so far. Bernanke, who has continually been wrong in his pronouncements on the Credit Crisis and recession is also being believed by the market for no apparent reason. Bernanke was incredibly self-congratulatory in his speech, giving the major central bankers full credit for saving the world from global recession. The proof that this has happened is minimal to say the least and exists mostly in manipulated government statistics that lack any credibility. Lost in the coverage was the failure of four more U.S. banks on Friday, including one with $13 billion in assets. So far this year 81 U.S. banks have failed, compared to 3 in 2007.

Natural gas is staying at its impossible price levels. The near-term futures contract fell as low as $2.75 toward the close on Friday. UNG was down 1.4%, while GAZ was up 1.3%. Their price movements should be almost identical and certainly they shouldn't move in opposite directions. But that is only true in reality, something which the market has become completely detached from.

NEXT: Bernanke Reappointed, Court Order and FDIC

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Natural Gas Deconstructed

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If you think logically, what is happening in the natural gas market will be difficult for you to understand. Markets actually always act rationally however, if you have all the facts available. When they don't seem to be doing so, it is because there is additional information that needs to be considered in order to fully understand what is taking place. In these circumstances you need to think about what could be taking place behind the scenes that could explain what is going on.

The natural gas storage report was released yesterday and it was bullish. Storage went up 52 BCFs and expectations were they would go up 55 BCFs. Natural gas has been declining for the last 11 days and is a heavily shorted market. So did it go up on bullish news? No, it sold off! The near term futures contract closed at $2.95. This in and of itself makes absolutely no sense and defies all rules in how markets operate. Even more surprising is that the cost of production for natural gas in the U.S. is somewhere around $4 to $5 depending on the source. It was already noted two months ago that 50% of U.S. gas wells had already been shut down because of low prices. Production should be close to collapse at this point.

The natural gas futures market is also in extreme contango (distant future prices much higher than the current futures contract), certainly the most extreme of any market in recent history. And the contango is getting even worse. The average price for natural gas futures between November and March is $5.32. Moreover, the oil/natural gas price ratio went over 24 yesterday. It peaked around 22 in 1990. This is also an historical extreme. When something gets way above (or below) its long term average, it invariably reverts back to the mean over time.

So who's making money off of this? This statement, which I found in an article for futures traders explains it all: "Traders on the future market are able to lock in the difference of over $2 per MMBTUs and cover their risk exposure by storing supplies until next winter." This is a particular boon to the large users of natural gas and these are the people profiting handsomely from the seemingly irrational behavior in the market. Furthermore, all of this has been made possible because of the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), the government regulatory body which is supposed to be keeping the markets honest (and is doing as good a job as the proverbial fox guarding the hen house).

The CFTC announced in June they were planning on reigning in speculation in the market and have been holding hearings this summer. They specifically targeted the UNG ETF as a major source of speculation, even though it is a passive investment vehicle that only buys more natural gas futures in response to investor demand. UNG is also an investment vehicle used by small investors. Along with the SEC, which prevented UNG from issuing news shares for awhile and functioning as an ETF should, the CFTC has tried to cripple UNG's operations. This has allowed the big users of the commodity to drive near term natural gas prices to theoretically impossible levels - and make a killing. Like the SEC and its handling of $65 billion Ponzi Schemer Bernie Madoff (who was investigated several times over a many year period, but no dishonest behavior was ever found), the CFTC hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the big players.

As mentioned in yesterday's blog, there is an alternative to UNG. The ETN GAZ also represents the price of natural gas. While UNG lost 50 cents yesterday, GAZ was up 81 cents at one point, although it closed up only 16 cents. The trading volume on GAZ yesterday was enormous reaching almost 17 times the 200-day average. It looked like investors were dumping UNG to buy GAZ, which as an ETN is not affected by the CFTC's investigations. In theory, an ETF and ETN investing in the same commodity should move not only with the commodity, but by the same percentage amount. GAZ actually went up (and by a lot at one point) when natural gas futures were selling off and UNG was down. Just another indication that all rules of reality have temporarily been suspended in the natural gas market.

NEXT: U.S. Dollar, Stocks, Bernanke and Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Up; Retail, Economy and Deficit Down

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Oil had a huge rally yesterday, going up more than 4% on a bullish storage report. It is still over $72 this morning. The oil/natural gas ratio is over 20 and is at the same high that it was in 1990 when it last peaked. There is about a 20 year cycle to this ratio and it should be falling for the next 10 years or so. We shall see. In the shorter term the natural gas storage report is out at 10:30 this morning (New York time). Natural gas can be bought either with the ETF UNG (which is being harassed by the regulatory authorities) or with the ETN GAZ. Natural gas futures are in extreme contango.

The stock market is trying to maintain its rally, which is supposedly dependent on the coming economic recovery. Sears Holdings, which released its Q2 earnings this morning, is going to be a drag on the rally today. The company lost 17 cents last quarter. Analysts expected a gain of 35 cents. Revenue fell 10.3% and was also below expectations. The company's credit rating, which was already in junk territory, was lowered further today by Moody's. Although the financial picture of this major retailer is nothing short of disastrous, the stock has risen 80% this year as of yesterday. At least it is down this morning. This company typifies the market rally - a huge rise in the midst of really bad fundamentals. Who would buy under such circumstances and why?

Weekly job claims also rose this morning to 576,000. This is still deep in recession territory. The rule of thumb for years has been weekly claims at or above 400,000 indicates the U.S. economy is in recession. A healthy economy has weekly claims around 300,000. The market had a good rally a couple of weeks ago when claims fell to 550,000. The "better numbers" were heralded in the press and claimed to be an indication of the waning recession. The press should have waited until claims fall and stay below 400,000 before publishing that story (but that would be responsible reporting, so of course that didn't happen). The press also never mentions that a large percentage of the U.S. workforce isn't eligible to collect unemployment, so when these people become unemployed they don't show up in the weekly claims figures.

The "good news" out this morning is that the Obama administration is predicting the federal budget deficit will be only $1.58 trillion this year. This is still almost 4 times bigger than the previous record budget deficit. Some contingency bailout funds for the big banks won't have to be spent (at least by September 30th of this year). Before you trust any numbers from the White House, consider that their argument for the current stimulus package was it would keep the unemployment rate at 8% or lower. Without it they claimed that unemployment could rise as high as 9%! So the stimulus package was passed early this year and so far unemployment has gotten as high as 9.5% - and that is with a lot of manipulation of the numbers to make them look better. You should assume that all the other numbers coming from the administration are just as reliable.

NEXT: Natural Gas Deconstructed

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke and Natural Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Fed Chair Ben Bernanke was on Capital Hill for a second day of hearings yesterday. This time he appeared before the Senate. As he did in his testimony before the House, Bernanke spent a great deal of time assuring the Senate that the Fed could "exit" the policy moves of the Fed (including increasing its balance sheet by over a $1 trillion and massive increases in bank reserves) he has made before inflation pressures mount. This is like saying Pandora's Box can be closed again after it was opened. I do not know if our elected representatives burst into hysterical laughter or chuckled in an amused manner when Bernanke made these statements. This was not recorded in the hearing transcripts.

Once again Bernanke also emphasized that "monetary policy remains focused on fostering economic recovery". Apparently the focus isn't working. A number of senators complained that businesses in their states reported that banks were refusing to lend funds because of the crisis. Since nothing in U.S. government policy requires them to do so and the Fed and U.S. Treasury have made it possible for banks to earn riskless money, why should they lend? Bernanke at least admitted that reducing unemployment was "difficult and challenging". So his policies aren't working for anything that they are supposedly 'focused' on fixing. Maybe that's because they are focused on creating inflation instead.

In one of the great hypocritical moments in contemporary American politics, Senator Chris Dodd asked Bernanke, "When can the American people expect the recovery that they have funded?" Dodd himself publicly demanded the policies Bernanke has followed and supported the programs the Treasury has implemented. He also has a history of questionable dealings with Fannie Mae and was an enthusiastic supporter of government policies that led to the Credit Crisis. Now of course he's complaining the Fed and Treasury haven't cleaned up the mess he helped create. For his part, Bernanke said that Congress should try to reign in its spending. This of course would cause the economy to contract and make Bernanke's policies even less effective than they already are.

But the American public can rest assured that the Fed's no interest rate policy will continue no matter what. Bernanke made it clear that interest rates would not be raised any time soon. My guess is that the Fed is also pumping huge amounts of liquidity into the financial system currently (so there would be no complaints from congress about the stock market falling apart). This would explain both the stock rally and the weak dollar (trading just above its breakdown level for the third day in a row). Gold closed at $953 an ounce yesterday, a six-week high.

In presumably unrelated news, the weekly Natural Gas storage report was out this morning. Storage was up 66 bcfs versus an estimate for a rise of 67 bcfs. Stocks are 458 bcfs above the 5-year average. Natural gas futures fell 0.6% after the report was released.


NEXT: Is It 1998 All Over Again?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21



This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Dollar Watch; Bad Earnings are Good; Natural Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While no one was watching, the U.S. dollar got awfully close to its break down point yesterday. The low for the trade-weighted dollar index ETF DXY was 78.58. A drop below 78.33 would be technically negative. Meanwhile, earnings season will be winding down soon and so far the picture is dismal overall and even worse for the financials. You would never know it though, from the mainstream media reports which have been glowing and gushing with good earnings news. Many commodities have started to rally again, with natural gas still being very under priced.

Almost without exception, the large financial companies have had dismal earnings in their banking business, which continues to erode. Trading and accounting gimmicks have made the top line numbers look rosy however. Massive money gifts from the federal government don't hurt either. Imagine if someone deposited $45 billion into your bank account. You would look a lot more financially sound as well. Wells Fargo is out with earnings this morning, with quarterly profit up 47%! Looks good on the surface, although acquiring the giant albatross Wachovia was responsible for much of this. Within the report was the statement, "the bank expects credit losses and nonperforming assets to increase". It is also generally acknowledged that Wells Fargo needs to raise more capital. Even the 'see no evil' government stress test found that it had a $13.7 billion capital shortfall. But hey, earnings are great, except in the bank's banking business of course. For some reason, I think this doesn't make any sense.

Natural gas has been getting a lot of press in the last few days. UNG the natural gas ETF is awaiting approval from the SEC to issue more shares. They already made 300 million additional shares available on May 6th. The CFTC is trying to limit UNG's role in the natural gas market based on excessive speculation driving up prices even though natural gas is trading at a multi-year low. Seems to be rather contradictory. Media reports are filled with commentary from traders and 'experts' about how you should stay away from this market. They rarely if ever point out that natural gas tends to hit some type of low in July. I have yet to see any discussion of the production costs for natural gas and whether the price has fallen below this level. There is every reason to believe this is the case. The number of active U.S. rigs pumping natural gas has fallen to a seven year low of 665 from a peak of 1606 last September 12th. When the market cost gets too close to the production cost for a commodity, production shuts down and this is clearly happening with natural gas.

The dollar will either bounce soon or fall below its break down point and the powers that be will try to then save it. Note that once again that the stock market has been rallying when the dollar has been dropping. Will a government induced dollar rally cause the opposite? We will have to wait and see.

NEXT: Bernanke and Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Energy, Commodities and the U.S. Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Light sweet crude fell below 60 this morning in European trading. It has traded as low as 58.86 pre market. Brent seems to be trading higher, which is unusual since it is a poorer quality oil . This type of price inversion was common in February when oil hit its bottom. While a number of commentators claim 60 is strong support for light sweet crude, there is a Fibonacci retracement around 58 and this is a place where the price could hold. We will have to see. There has been too much selling too fast in the oil market and it is has been based on attempts at government manipulation of the market through the CFTC, not because there is an oversupply of oil as the press continually and inaccurately reports (oil in U.S. storage is actually dropping at a precipitous rate).

While the CFTC has regulatory power over all commodity trading in the U.S., it specifically singled out the energy markets for potential trading restrictions. Even though the alleged reason was speculators were causing high prices, it is planning on investigating the natural gas market even though natural gas is trading at a multi-year low (obviously those speculators are incompetent). The real motivation behind the CFTC's action is that the EFT UNG owns 20% of the futures contracts in the market and this is making the big Wall Street players uncomfortable. Issuance of new shares of UNG were suspended on July 7th because regulatory approval wasn't forthcoming. Without the ability to issue new shares with increasing investor demand, an ETF turns into a de facto closed-end fund. Expect this to eventually happen to every ETF. The vested interests are not going to let small investors hone in on their turf.

Every commodity has had a big sell off during July trading and it can all be traced to the CFTC. Fundamentals have nothing to do with it in the case of oil, gold and silver, so you should assume a reversal back to previous values will take place once this is over. While commodities usually trade inversely to the dollar, there has been no dollar rally. The trade-weighted dollar bottomed in early June at 78.40 and has only gotten about 3 cents above the level at its best since then. It closed under 80 again yesterday. Even this morning though the media was reporting 'oil and gold selling off on higher dollar'. They have reported this same story over and over again. One of the news reports today didn't even have any price quote for the dollar, a violation of basic reporting rules. They know their whole story falls apart if people actually have the facts in front of them.

As for the CFTC, will it be investigating manipulation of the silver market by the two big banks with huge short positions? They have been made aware of this, but like the SEC with Bernie Madoff the CFTC is a hear no evil, see no evil operation when it comes to large Wall Street interests manipulating the commodity markets. That is as long as that manipulation supports the government's desire to help prop up the dollar and the economy with lower gold, silver, and oil prices. Short term manipulation eventually leads to long term problems however. Commodity producers just stop producing when the price gets too low and then shortages result if the price is held down too long. Natural gas is probably priced around that level right now.

NEXT: The Non-Stimulating Economic Stimulus Plan

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

So Far, So Bad

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The stock market is tanking today. A sell off the last trading day before July 4th is statistically unlikely and should be considered bearish in and of itself. We will have to wait until the close next Tuesday to see if the first four trading days of the quarter were net down and are also providing a bear signal. Stocks started off strong on Wednesday, but faded as the day progressed. The Dow was up only 57 points at the end, but managed to close above its 200-day moving average for only the second time in almost three weeks. Volume was unusually low for the first day of a quarter. The Dow is below both its 200-day and 50-day as I write this and a close below both key levels at the end of a week can only be interpreted as negative.

The monthly employment report was released this morning and set the tone for trading. A loss of 325,000 jobs was predicted by analysts, but the number came in way above expectations at 467,000. The official unemployment rate was 9.5%. If discouraged and involuntary part-time workers are factored in, unemployment would have been 16.5%. Only education and health care were supposedly hiring last month.

While bad economic news is negative for a currency, somehow the U.S. dollar went up on this news. The mainstream media has indeed been reporting the dollar rise and explaining it as safe haven buying. If you are puzzled by this, you should be, especially since gold is going down at the same time. No one in their right mind would load up on a currency with a weak economy as a safe haven play. It is more likely the invisible hand of the U.S. Treasury lifting the dollar today. Don't expect the media to ever report that though.

All the major U.S. stock indices are down over 2% in afternoon trading. Oil is performing even worse. The commodity hit a low of $66.54 in today's trading and was just over 67 at the close of NYMEX trading. Natural gas futures are barely down, although UNG is dropping big time. The cause of the disconnect is not clear. The reason for any drop whatsoever is even less clear, since the storage report this morning was very bullish. Analysts expected a build up of 82 billion cubic feet, but the increase was only 70 billion.

I guess we will just have to wait until next week to see how things play out.

NEXT: Does Money Printing Cause Deflation or Inflation?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21




This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Building a BRIC House; Nat Gas and Market Update

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries had their first ever summit yesterday. Much of the discussion centered around how they can diversify their assets out of the U.S. dollar - BRIC countries hold nearly one-third of overseas U.S. debt - without creating too much disruption. It would be more appropriate to state this as they are trying to find a way to dump their dollar holdings without causing the dollar to drop too much while they are doing so. They are considering buying each others debt. Whatever happens, they will be certainly be buying less U.S. debt in the future and you should assume they are slowly selling off their current holdings.

The implications for the U.S are dire. For the last three decades we have been dependent on borrowing money from foreign countries to fund out twin trade and budget deficits. While the trade deficit has improved somewhat with the recent collapse in oil prices (it's still very large), our budget deficit in 2009 is going to come in more than four times the previous record. Foreign sources were probably already tapped out before the Credit Crisis caused U.S. borrowing needs to balloon and now they are diminishing their lending instead. This will only force the U.S. to print more and more new money to cover its spending needs. This is the path Weimar Germany followed and it is what lead to their hyperinflation.

The trade-weighted dollar was at 80.23 this morning, still holding above its 78.33 break down level. Light sweet crude was as high as 71.73, but then fell back to around the 71 level. The Natural Gas storage report came out this morning and gas in storage increased by 114 bcfs, while expectations were for an increase of only 110 bcfs. UNG sold off 40 cents in the two minutes following the release of the data. I am not interested in buying though until it can get to around the 15 level. As of yesterday, the Dow has closed below its 200-day moving average three days in a row. So far today, it hit this line from below and bounced down. The S&P 500 and Russell 2000 have held above theirs. A break and close below for the S&P and Russell would be significant.

For some commentary from a Bloomberg reporter about the U.S. treasury bond smuggling case out of Italy and that was reported in this blog on Monday, please click below (if the URL doesn't work, try putting it into a browser):
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a62_boqkurbI
Whatever the truth is behind this caper, it is worthy of a James Bond novel.

NEXT: Quadruple Witching Today; Fraud Update

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Disaster Stalks the Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Gold and silver were down this morning, while the U.S. dollar was attempting a recovery. The trade-weighted dollar fell back below 80 though and the precious metals started to recover. It must be requiring superhuman efforts on the part of the central banks to prevent a major drop of the currency at this point after the body blow struck by the Russians yesterday. The natural gas storage report was mildly bullish today. Oil trade remains listless although light sweet crude was above 72 earlier today.

As usual, the mainstream media is not informing the public about a major financial story that it needs to know about. Russia is the third biggest purchaser of U.S. treasuries. Yesterday it said it is reducing its holdings by not buying new bonds when the current ones expired. Put this together with China altering its holdings of U.S. treasuries from long term to short term bonds and this spells major trouble for the U.S. When our budget deficits were hoovering around $400 billion a year, we managed through great efforts to get foreign governments to lend us enough to support our proliferate spending. This year's budget deficit will be around $1800 billion. It is estimated that only 53% of U.S. federal government expenditures will be covered by taxes (when this number fell to 69% in Weimar Germany, hyperinflation devastated the country only 5 years later - the U.S. in is much worse shape currently). To cover our budget deficit, we need to borrow or print money to make up the difference. Just as our borrowing needs are skyrocketing, foreign lending sources are drying up. It is inevitable that U.S. money printing will be ratcheting up soon.

The Russian story is even more significant however. All the foreign bond holders know there is a lot of inflation on the horizon, but most haven't acted yet. The situation is analogous to a crowded theatre where everyone smells smoke, but is ignoring it because they are busy watching the play. Suddenly someone jumps up out of their seat, runs toward the exit and shouts fire once they get there. Is everyone else going to just remain in their seats or will there be a stampede to the exits? This is the danger the dollar is now facing.

Oil is drifting up today and natural gas is doing well. The natural gas storage report was mildly bullish with expectations for an increase of 108.5 BCFs and the actual increase coming in at 106 BCFs. Oil is getting closer to its Fibonacci retracement around 77. A spike up to or above the level would be a good sell signal.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

NEXT: Gold, Oil, Dollar and Market Update

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

So Far This Doesn't Look Like a Top

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The S&P 500 broke through its 200-day moving average yesterday following the Nasdaq's successful breakout last week. The Dow only managed to pierce this line and then it bounced down. If all the averages can break through and hold above the 200, this rally will continue to have legs. The next key test will be if the 50-day moving averages can cross the 200 days. This is the classical confirmation that a bull market has begun. This is at least a couple of weeks off. A failed cross of the 50-day is not out of the question, so we will have to wait and see. Oil continued its impressive rally yesterday, rising for the 6th day in the row. Rallies like the one we are currently seeing should make you start to think of selling if you got in at the bottom. It all depends on the technical picture of course and your investing time horizon.

I sold Nova Gold (NG) this morning because it had gone up too far, too fast. The price was way above the 10-day moving average (use 20% above as a rule of thumb for overextension) and the RSI had gone above 80 on the daily charts and had stayed at the level for several days (this is mega-bullish blow off behavior and is not sustainable). On the other hand, Harry Winston (HWD) just broke and closed above its 200-day moving average yesterday, which indicates a likely continuation of its bullish pattern. It is not overextended from its 10-day, so I am willing to keep it for the moment.

Many oil stocks are getting overdone however. The rally which has taken place since the beginning of last week has taken oil up quite a bit in a short period of time. At this point, it looks like the resistance around 70 could cause a temporary sell off before a further rise to the 75-78 area. I might be taking some profits today or Wednesday morning with the intention of buying back lower. For investors who can't pay attention to the market closely, it is best to leave well enough alone until oil gets into the mid 70s. Even then, I think higher highs will be in store for oil during the summer.

One thing I have been accumulating is Natural Gas (UNG). Gas can rally into the October/ November time frame and there is potentially a lot of profit to be made there, since it is barely off of its bottom. I have held onto all of my silver, which is around its resistance of 16 today. Gold is pushing for the key 1000 level. I have no intention of selling any of it until the breakout and move up to around 1200 level. Watch the trade-weighted dollar. It is in the high 78's right now and a breakdown below 78 will be bullish for all commodities and will definitely set off the gold rally.

NEXT: Market at Key Juncture

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Takes Gas, Silver's Shining Moment, GM Watch

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The oil inventory report was delayed this week and it was bullish big time for the third week in a row. The natural gas report was just better than expectations, but even this minimal accomplishment proved a combustible mix that caused UNG (the natural gas ETF) to shoot upward. SLV (the silver ETF) traded over 15.00 this morning, removing all doubt that a breakout has taken place from strong resistance around 14.50. News reports are indicating that some progress is being made with GM bondholders in a last minute effort to avert the largest industrial bankruptcy in the history of the United States.

Analysts expected that U.S. oil inventories would rise 1.8 million barrels last week. Boy did they get a surprise! Inventories fell by 5.4 million barrels. Gasoline, the major use for oil during the summer months, had 600,000 less barrels in storage. Year over year U.S. gasoline demand is down only 1.2% despite the troubled economy, yet oil is still 47% off of last year's high. Despite dropping supply and the barely lower demand for gasoline compared to the much lower price of oil, you can still find bearish comments on oil in media coverage. Our favorite oil ETF, DXO, has continually told an opposite tale however - and when in doubt, the market is always right. DXO broke above 4.00 today and should be heading higher until light sweet crude reaches at least $75 a barrel. Triple leveraged energy company ETF, ERX, is having an even better day after consolidation around support between 29 and 30 level.

While oil may have only a month or so left of its rally (frequently when the most money is made), natural gas is still putting in its bottom and I have been accumulating UNG since it fell back to the low 14's. Unlike oil, the fundamentals of natural gas are indeed negative and have been for a long time. Moreover, the favorable seasonal for natural gas can begin as late as July as opposed to February for oil. The peak is most likely in late October, early November, while oil statistically peaks in early August. This week, analysts expected U.S. storage of natural gas to increase 111 bcfs (billion cubic feet), but the increase came in at only 106 bcfs. In a heavily shorted market, that was enough to generate a big move up.

In the precious metals, SLV trading above 15.00 today was quite impressive. At the moment silver is doing better than gold, but it has a lot of catch up to do. Gold is only 4% off its recent highs of 1000, while silver is about 30% lower than it previous high around 21. SLV has another point of resistance at 16. After that, SLV testing 21 is almost certain.

Some progress seems to have been made with GM bondholders this morning. It is still too early to tell if this will come to fruition. Whether or not GM declares bankruptcy (allowing this to happen will be one of the biggest economic mistakes that the U.S. government has ever made) is obviously going to go down to the wire. The stock has not fallen below a $1.00 today however and is actually up 10% at the moment. When the market thinks a company is going bankrupt, it pushes its price into the penny level. Watch to see if this happens. While a GM bankruptcy will weigh on the market, the avoidance of bankruptcy would cause a big rally next week.

NEXT: Silver, Oil , Gold - Market Screams Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Pull Back or Top?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Stocks had a sharp drop yesterday. Some people have already stated that the market has topped out. While certainly this is possible, the argument is weak. The market doesn't go up every day, although this may not have seemed to be the case lately. Even the best rallies have sharp drops. As was mentioned in this blog several days ago, there were a lot of stocks in the market that were overextended and floating way beyond their 10-day moving averages. A decline for them was inevitable and is now taking place. If they drop enough, they offer a major trading opportunity. In general, small oil producers and drillers offer the best deals in this scenario. While some areas of the market may already be in decline, others will perk up. The PPI report today indicated a whiff of inflation and you can expect much worse in the future.

The Nasdaq was down 3% yesterday. It is the only major stock index that has hit its 200-day moving average - classic resistance in a bear market rally. It hoovered at that level for 9 days. The Dow and S&P 500 have yet to get to this key level. It is not unreasonable to assume they will before the rally ends. Oil managed to go down slightly despite a massive drop in oil and gasoline in U.S. storage. I have noticed this lack of reaction on the storage news several times during the rally that began in February. The market has only reacted to the good or bad news two or three days later. So much for the Efficient Market Hypothesis.

While oil itself dropped a small amount, small cap oil stocks were down as much as 15%. The ones that were floating well above their 10-day moving average need to come down to at least their 20-day (the 30-day or 40-day would be even better) moving average to restore some balance. They become good trading buys at that point, especially if gaps are filled by the drop and the RSI has fallen to around 50. HTE, which had about a 50% rally in only four trading days is a good example of this type of stock. PDS less so. In many cases, coal stocks were even more extended than oil and they need even more selling to get to a bargain price. Take a look as MEE for example (don't buy it, at least not yet, just take a look at it). The incipient rally in natural gas has another type of profile (a rally at the beginning and one that has been going on for awhile have different trading rules). UNG needs to come back down to its 50-day moving average before it becomes interesting.

While inflation effects oil and other commodity prices, it is even more important to gold and silver. The PPI report this morning was up 0.3% after dropping 1.2% in March. Year over year, PPI is down 3.7%, although core prices are UP 3.4% (yes up, they have never been negative). Food prices rose 1.5% in April with a record jump in eggs and large price increases in vegetables and meats. Energy prices supposedly fell last month (yeah, that's realistic). The deflation that the government claims took place in its highly manipulated reports is dependent on falling oil prices. Once they go back up - and this has been happening since February - the deflation that never really existed is going to turn into very ugly inflation. Unlike the deflation, the inflation will be real.

NEXT: The Scamdemic in Insurance, Autos and Swine Flu

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

NYIM May 5th Meeting; Oil Report; Swine Flu Update

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

We would like to thank our guest, best selling author William Cohan for a great interview at the New York Investing meetup last night. The discussion of his recent book, "House of Cards" touched on many of the major issues currently facing Wall Street and the financial system. Cohan was mostly critical of Wall Street during his talk as he was in his book. There was also a talk at the meeting about stocks, oil, gold and silver and where the opportunities currently lie. To find out even more about this topic, we urge everyone in the New York Metro area to attend the New York Hard Assets Investment Conference next Monday and Tuesday. Registration is free and can be done by going to: http://www.hardassetsny.com/. Meanwhile, more news about swine flu is coming out, but the medical authorities are finally being somewhat more responsible about informing the public about what is really going on.

While there are many point of agreement between the New York Investing meetup and William Cohan, some divergences of opinion come out during his interview. Cohan stated quite clearly that he believed significant reform was on the way for Wall Street and that he had high hopes for Timothy Geithner's tenure as Treasury Secretary. While there is certainly a strong movement for reform among the American populace, little has been done so far and anyone who reads this blog regularly knows we are not fans of Timid Tim Geithner. We certainly agree with Cohan's criticism of Congress and the large campaign donations that it accepts from Wall Street has corrupted our system. We don't agree with Cohan's favorable views of TARP, something we vehemently opposed and consider to be one of the biggest wastes of government money ever. Cohan did provide some interesting insight into the failure of Lehman Brothers saying there was really no clear answer why the authorities let it fail other than the timing of its demise (if it had been first, he believes a bailout would have taken place) and it wasn't a favored institution of the government as is Goldman Sachs. We hope to have at least excerpts of the interview out on video shortly.

The weekly oil storage report came out from the EIA this morning and it looked pretty bullish. Oil in storage was up only 600,000 barrels, while analysts has expected a rise of 2,000,000 barrels. Gasoline was down 200,000 barrels and the high demand summer driving season is just about to begin. In the meetup last night we showed how oil was well below its 200-day moving average and predicted it needs to get to that level before the current rally will end. Oil jumped up to a new 5-month high after the inventory report with light sweet crude reaching $55.55 a barrel. There is probably at least $20 more upside to the commodity, if not more, before a 2009 high is hit.

In today's media coverage, the first actual American death of someone who tested positive for swine flu was reported. Read the articles carefully however, they do NOT say that the woman who died on the Texas/Mexican border died of swine flu. Indeed the medical authorities refuse to state that she did and said that she had other 'critical underlying medical problems'. The little Mexican boy who died in Houston also had other significant medical issues. In Mexico, the current count is 42 deaths (still nowhere near the originally reported 160). No medical history is available for most of these people, who were poor and had limited access to health care. It is quite possible all of them had other medical issues as well and swine flu was not the primary cause of their deaths. This would explain why there are no swine flu deaths outside Mexico in places where advanced health care systems and accurate record keeping exist. There is no substantial proof that the current outbreak of swine flu is deadly, nor that it is even a serious disease.

NEXT: A Rally Frothing at the Mouth

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.