Gold and Silver Recover After Big Drop in Asia

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While Americans slept, gold and silver prices plummeted in Asia. The low took place in Hong Kong  at approximately 3AM New York time when spot gold flirted with the $1540 level and silver was around $26. A strong rally then took place after the London market opened half an hour later.

By the time Monday New York trading began at 8AM, spot gold was selling for $1626 and spot silver at $28.50 an ounce. So the average American investor wasn't able to buy into the carnage. The low prices set in Asia will almost certainly be tested in the future however and there is a good chance that  will take place during U.S. trading hours. As of now though, the $30 support level for silver is history.

In the last three days, gold has experienced it biggest drop since the 2008 Credit Crisis. Silver has had it largest decline on record. There is significant technical damage, especially for silver. On the 24-hour charts, silver has decisively broken its 325-day/65-week simple moving average -- a key line in the sand separating bullish and bearish trading behavior. This level is in the low 1400s for gold. Silver's behavior is telegraphing that gold will almost certainly hit that level. If silver can't hold the 26 level in the future, the next stop for it will be in the 21/22 range.

What is causing the big drop in precious metals? Well, both silver and gold were extremely overbought at their highs. When this happens, a lot of traders were buying heavily on margin. This creates a situation where many of them will be forced to sell at the same time if any bad news takes place. Once the selling starts, the market cascades downward. We are seeing that with gold and silver right now. Such behavior is common in any strong rally and does not by itself indicate a bubble (that would require at least a 500% to 1000% yearly price rise for the precious metals).

While a rising U.S. dollar during September and new margin requirements from the CME last Friday have led to precious metals selling, the big problem is in Europe. The Greek debt and EU bank crisis is causing a liquidity crunch for the big trading houses and they are selling whatever they can to raise cash.  The inadvertent result is that investors are being given the opportunity to pick up precious metals at bargain prices. A little patience might be advisable before hitting the buy button however.


Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Stocks and Commodities Setting Up for a Major Breakdown

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Global markets were acting like they were on the verge of a collapse on Thursday, the day after the Federal Reserve's Operation Twist announcement. The selling was ugly and is likely to get even worse in October.

In Asian trading last night, the Hang Seng in Hong Kong barely avoided a mini-crash, falling 4.9% (5.0% is the cutoff) or 912 points. The Sensex in India shed 704 points and was down approximately 4.0%. The market is attempting to cover a gap on the charts made two years ago. The chronically- bearish Nikkei in Japan was down only 2.1%.

In Europe, both the FTSE in the UK and the DAX in Germany also almost closed in mini-crash territory. The FTSE was down more than 5.0% at one point, but managed to rally toward the end of day. The DAX closed down 4.96%, just a whisker less than a mini-crash. The CAC-40 in Paris wasn't as fortunate. It closed down 5.3%. European banks were in the forefront of the selling with French banks being particularly hard hit. French banks are heavily exposed to Greek government and corporate debt. UK banks were also down considerably because of problems left over from the 2008 Credit Crisis.

The U.S. markets opened down and got worse as the trading day proceeded.  The Dow closed down 391 points or 3.5%, the S&P 500 39 points of 3.3%, the Nasdaq 83 points or 3.3%, and the small cap Russell 2000 21 points or 3.2%. Banks stocks in the U.S. received bad news with Moody's downgrading the credit ratings of Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citigroup. Moody's indicated that it believes bailouts will be less likely in the future.

Commodities were not immune to the selling with gold, silver, oil and copper experiencing significant downside action. Spot gold traded as low as $1722.30 in New York. December futures were down as much as $78.50 at one point. Spot silver traded as low as $35.41. Both gold and silver had some recovery from their lows. Crude Oil (West Texas Intermediate) fell to $80.89 and was down $5.03. Economically-sensitive copper was crushed falling as low as $3.46 a pound. It was down 8.6%. Copper has fallen more than 20% from its all-time high in February and is technically in a bear market. The price behavior of copper is supposedly the best indication of global economic activity.

The key levels for investors to watch are the August lows for stocks and commodities. These were tested today on the Dow Industrials and the Russell 2000. If these get taken out, things should really start to get interesting.  These levels have already been broken in France and the major emerging markets. Technical analysts should note that the Dow Industrials, the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000 all formed  a very clear head and shoulders topping pattern in August and September.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Three Crashes and a Second Credit Crisis

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The tech heavy Nasdaq and small cap Russell 2000 crashed again yesterday, August 18th. Nasdaq was down 131 points or 5.22% and the Russell 2000 was down 42 points or 5.90%. This is the third crash for both of them since the beginning of the month. Repeating crashes (drops of 5% or more in one day) were  common during the Credit Crisis in the fall of 2008 and indicate severe stress in the global financial system.

As in the fall of 2008, bank stocks are leading the way down. The only difference now is that bank stocks in Europe are getting hit the hardest, whereas it was U.S. and UK banks three years ago. So far, U.S. markets are holding up better than those in the EU. The Dow and S&P 500 have had only one mini-crash so far. The German DAX has had several. While continental European markets have been hit the hardest, Asian markets have continued to suffer the least from the current turmoil. The Hong Kong markets are being more impacted than those in Japan.

While U.S. banks Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo were down somewhat more than 4.5% yesterday and Bank of America and Citigroup 6.0%.  This was much better than the 10% drop in Germany's Commerzbank, the 11.5% drop in the Britain's Barclays and the 12% drop in France's 

Société Générale. As of August 18th, the EURO STOXX Financials index was down 38% from earlier this year.

Just last week, French banks were supposedly in trouble, but this was denied by them and one major French news outlet retracted a story that claimed this was the case. Yesterday, the ECB (European Central Bank) said one bank, which it didn't identify, had paid above-market rates to borrow $500 million a day for seven days. Today, it was reported that the U.S. Fed supplied $200 million of liquidity to the Swiss National Bank in the form of forex swaps. These are two separate issues. Switzerland is suffering from a skyrocketing currency (which is going to cause massive loan defaults in Eastern Europe if it continues since many loans there are denominated in Swiss francs), whereas the ECB is trying to keep banks afloat despite the fallout from the Greek debt crisis.

The chances of a full Greek default  (a selective default with bondholders taking a 21% haircut was already part of the second bailout deal reached in July) intensified on Thursday. Finland insisted that Greece provide a cash deposit equivalent to its share of the second bailout guarantees. Four other countries then made similar demands. This of course undermines the bailout by taking away money with one hand that the bailout is providing with the other.

Financial crisis behavior was also evident in the U.S. treasury markets. The yield on the 10-year fell as low as 1.9872 on Thursday, taking out the low from 2008. The two-year treasury has been hitting a series of new lows and has been significantly below its Credit Crisis bottom for some time now. One thing that is different from the 2008 Credit Crisis is that gold is rallying strongly and is in a blowoff. The December gold futures contract hit another all-time high  at $1881.40 this morning before U.S. stocks opened.  Gold has always been a safe haven throughout history and despite claims to the contrary, it will remain so.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21 
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Similarities Between the 2010 and 1997 Market Crashes

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


My blog post on May 4th mentioned the stock market was rolling over and on May 5th, I made the comparison between the problems in Europe today with those of Asia in 1997. I specifically pointed out that the Dow Jones Industrial Average had a one-day 7% drop because of the Asian crisis. The next day, the Dow was down 9.9% intraday on the current European crisis.

The Asian crisis in 1997, frequently referred to as the Asian contagion because it eventually spread from country to country, started with a currency crisis in Thailand. It soon engulfed most of East and South Asia. While Thailand's economy was small, it had been vibrant for many years. Its currency was overvalued though and this is where the problem began. Few people would characterize Greece as having a vibrant economy at the moment, though it is certainly represents a very minor part of overall eurozone economic activity. As the Asian situation in 1997 demonstrated, problems that show up in small countries can easily spread throughout an entire region and have global consequences.

So what did the EU leadership do? Despite this recent historical lesson, they decided to continually postpone dealing with the situation in Greece. Not surprisingly, contagion began to spread to the other PIIGS countries (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, and Spain), the euro tanked and this in now endangering the export based economies of currency union, and finally, world markets have sold off. Fortunately, EU authorities weren't faced with an outbreak of bubonic plague - otherwise we'd all be dead.

The U.S. stock market drop in 1997 mostly took place on October 27th.  The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 7715 on Friday the 24th. It then dropped 554 points on Monday, closing just off its low for the day. The loss was 7.2%. The bottom wasn't hit until intraday on the 28th however. At the low, the Dow had lost another 225 points and was trading at 6936. From top to bottom, the index was down 10.1% in a little over a day. On Thursday, May 6, 2010, the Dow at its intraday low was down 9.9% from the previous day's close. So far at least, the percent of the two drops is almost identical.

The 200-day moving average was an important barrier in 1997 and probably will be so in 2010 (at least for now).  The markets were trading way above the 200-day before the drop in 1997, as they have been recently. There was some piercing of the 200-day both times. It could happen again in the next few days, but the 200-day should be considered an important support level that the market will try to hold or return to quickly on a break.

The VIX, the volatility indicator, spiked into the high 40's in 1997. In 2010, it rose to 42.14. While the highs are somewhat different, the rallies of the VIX in both cases are very similar. In October 1997, the VIX had been slowly rising for almost two years from a low of around 10 and was trading around the 20 level. The low of 15.23 in 2010 was hit in early April. The VIX rose approximately 47 points from its value a few weeks earlier during both crashes.

The important question now of course is what is going to happen. The markets recovered rapidly in 1997, but this was during a long-term secular bull market. We are now in a low-term secular bear market and such buoyancy can't be assumed. The 1997 crash was not the end of the market's problems either. Regional financial crisis after all can easily cause problems for a couple of years. A deep, but short, bear market followed in August 1998 caused by the collapse of Long-Term Capital. Central banks reacted by pumping liquidity into the financial system and the tech stock blow-off followed. If they do that this time, and they most certainly will, expect a commodities blow-off instead.

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

It's Amateur Night at the U.S. Treasury

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Markets hate uncertainty and the U.S. Treasury delivered it in spades yesterday. Several days ago, the Obabma administration floated the idea of a good bank/bad bank policy, where the U.S. government would buy up most of the toxic assets on bank balance sheets in order to get them out of the system. This was essentially the original concept for TARP before Paulson turned it into a direct corporate welfare program for Wall Street. The Street of course loved the idea of more bailout money to clean up their mistakes. In the long awaited for announcement by Treasury Secretary Geithner (who formerly ran the New York Fed and who is an admitted tax cheat) on Tuesday, suddenly a whole new approach was announced. The market, not liking surprises, had an almost crash level drop.

Media coverage blamed the stock sell off on the government's new plan - and for once I agree with the media. A number of articles had comments describing Treasury's new plan as 'muddled' and 'short on details', both of which are accurate descriptions. Essentially, the centerpiece of the plan is that the government will team up with the private sector to buy up to $1 trillion in toxic assets from financial firms (the big-money private sector buyers will get their purchases underwritten by the government, in what seems to be a riskless investment). A separate lending program would be expanded to as much as $1 trillion from $200 billion for consumers and businesses. Add up all the money involved (and it won't be enough by the way) to the $800 billion plus Stimulus Plan passed yesterday and the U.S. government is allocating between $2 to $3 trillion in new expenditures. Just think inflation and devaluation of the dollar.

Having read the speech that Geithner gave yesterday, I would say there is little hope that the current administration's economic team will be any more effective than the previous administration's. Geithner himself has been part of creating the current economic mess that we are in and sees the solution as pursuing the same failed financial policies that have lead to it. One of his comments that were particularly outrageous was that the Credit Crisis we are now in is only obvious in hindsight and could not have been predicted (even though probably hundreds of government throughout history have engaged in similar economic policies with similar results). At another point, Geithner stated that historically 40% of loans have been securitized (bundled into bonds and then sold and traded) and this needs to be continued. Where this 40% figure came from is beyond me, although of course it depends on the definition of 'historically' (Geithner's historical perspective may extend to only the beginning of last week based on these two comments). Securitization is what has led to our current problems, so of course we should continue to take the poison that is killing us. Not surprisingly, Wall Street makes a lot of its money from securitization.

While there is a lot of uncertainty in the government's handling of the Credit Crisis, there are some things which an investor can have great confidence in. The continued creation of money out of thin air to get the U.S. economy out of the economic pit it has fallen into is going to create a lot of inflation and a dollar that isn't worth the paper it's printed on. While the government's actions may fail for their intended purpose, they will be successful in creating this even bigger economic problem down the road.

NEXT: Market Doesn't Believe Retail Sales Report

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Banking Bloodbath Covers Wall Street in Red

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The bloodletting on financial stocks was almost relentless in U.S. trading yesterday. Trouble began in Europe the day before with the collapse of Royal Bank of Scotland stock, a collapse which took place despite (and some are now saying because of) a second bailout of the banking system by British authorities. The U.S. markets were closed for the Martin Luther King holiday, but when they reopened banks and brokers were cut to pieces. It was not a propitious beginning for the new Presidency.

Action in the market overall was ugly Tuesday and while financials led the way down, selling wasn't isolated to just that sector. While the Dow was down 4.0% and closed below the psychologically key support level of 8000, the technology laden Nasdaq suffered even more. The Nasdaq's 5.8% loss was a crash level drop. While the rest of the market fell apart, the gold ETF GLD gapped up sharply for the second day in the row, showing incredibly strong technical strength. As it has done throughout history, gold was shining once again in the midst of a crisis.

To say the drop in some financial stocks was a crash would actually be understating the situation. State Street was cut in half with a 50% drop. PNC was down 41%. Even though Bank of America was down 'only' 29% it hit yet another yearly low and without additional intervention (it was bailed out only a few days ago) the stock looks like it is headed toward oblivion . Citi, down 20% on the day, also managed to hit a yearly low and dropped below $3. The detailed action in the financials below:

State Street down 50 percent to 21.46.
PNC down 41 percent to 22.00.
Bank of America down 29 percent to 5.10.
Wells Fargo down 24 percent to 14.03.
Suntrust Banks down 24 percent to 15.07.
Citigroup down 20 percent to 2.80.
JPMorgan Chase down 20 percent to 18.09.
Goldman Sachs down 19 percent to 59.20.
Deutsche Bank down 19 percent to 21.00.
U.S. Bancorp down 16 percent to 15.34.
Morgan Stanley down 16 percent to 13.10.
UBS down 16 percent to 10.00.
Credit Suisse down18 percent to 19.76.
HSBC down 15 percent to 33.83.

Some recovery is taking place today in the banks and brokers because of Geithner's statements about more banking bailouts. Of course, that approach hasn't worked well so far. However, nothing succeeds like failure in recent U.S. economic policy.

NEXT: Volatility is Back

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

When Stimulus Ceases to be Stimulating

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Apparently Pavlov was right - and a better economist than anyone ever imagined. More than 100 years ago he noted that a stimulus has its greatest effect in the beginning and loses it impact if continually applied. Contemporary central bankers have apparently failed to appreciate the significance of this finding and its application to their field.

Early this morning New York time, the Bank of England cut interest rates 1.5%. While this may not be the biggest rate cut ever in nominal terms, it is enormous by any measure. The old rate was 4.75 and the new one is 3.25. Before the credit crisis began last year, a rate cut of this magnitude would have been enough to rally the market 10%, 15% or maybe even 20% in as little as a few days. However, as the credit crisis has proceeded, central banks rate cuts have lost their efficacy. The rallies that have resulted have become smaller and briefer. Today the FTSE 100 closed down 5.7%. Instead of the expected big rally, the London market crashed.

The Bank of England's grand rate cut gesture was a follow-up to the U.S. Fed's 50 basis point pre-election rate cut last week. While the Fed's cut helped prop up the American stock market into the voting, it could have done even more and there were rumors that it was considering 75 or even a 100 point cut (the remaining 25 or 50 basis point cut will probably be done at the next meeting). The ECB and the Swiss central bank decided to follow this more conservative approach today when they both cut 50 basis points also. Euro zone rates are now at 3.25%, above Britain's new 3.00% and well above the 1.00% in U.S. Counterintuitively, the trade weighted dollar rallied. This pattern has been seen since late July when funds have been flowing from high interest rate currencies to low interest rate currencies - something which seems to defy all logic.

Bourses on the continent suffered even more today than the British market, since they only had a big rate cut, instead of a truly huge rate cut to support stock prices. The German DAX was down 6.8% and the CAC-40 dropped 6.4%. The U.S. markets started selling as soon as they opened and hit a temporary bottom around 1:30, when the Dow was down more than 400 points and Nasdaq down over 70. Oil prices was hit even worse than stocks, with light sweet crude falling to $60.16 at one point. Don't be surprised if oil falls even further to 50 or even 40 in the future, although this may take awhile. In the shorter term, current levels are likely to be broken for stocks.

NEXT: Employment Losses Revealed After the Election

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Stock Market's Early Returns

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While the election doesn't appear to have resulted in the worse possible outcome for Wall Street, what did occur was interpreted by the market negatively enough to cause a small crash today. So far Obama has won the presidency by a 7% plurality, although based on turnout estimates several million votes seem to be missing from the tally. The Democrats have picked up at least five seats in the Senate and have solidified control, but the filibuster proof majority remains elusive for them. Four seats - Georgia, Minnesota, Oregon, and Alaska - are still undecided however. Currently the Republican is ahead by 500 votes or less in Minnesota and Alaska and recounts will be taking place. All the ballots haven't yet been counted in Oregon's mail-in-only election, but it looks like the Democrat will win when they are. As of now, Georgia is heading toward a run-off election next month because neither candidate got 50% of the vote. Alaska would have to have another election as well if convicted felon Stephens wins, since he will probably be expelled from the senate by early next year at the latest. Current tallies indicate that the Democrats picked up around 20 seats in the House and will have between an 81 an 88 vote majority.

Inexplicably the market rallied while the voting was taking place, with the Dow closing up 305 points or 3.3%. This was the biggest rally since 1980 when the market was first opened on election day. The previous biggest rally was a 1.2% gain in 1984 when Reagan defeated Mondale in a massive landslide that was universally predicted. Today, after seeing the returns all the major U.S. stock indices dropped 5% to 6%. Previously this would have been a headline news, but a drop of this magnitude has become commonplace in the last two months of high volatility trading.

Volatile markets are of course not healthy markets. A 305 point Dow rally yesterday, followed by a 487 point or 5.1% drop today should not inspire confidence. The S&P and Nasdaq were down a slightly greater percentage and the Russell was down the most with a 5.7% drop. Oil dropped $5.23 a barrel after an even bigger rally on election day. When Japan opened, the Nikkei followed the U.S. markets down, ending its morning session with a drop of 5.7%. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong was having an even bigger drop, while the Shanghai Composite hit a two-year low before attempting a recovery. Like the Nikkei, Korea and Taiwan were experiencing crash level drops at mid-day while Singapore and Australia were down somewhat less than 5%. If anything, volatility in Asian markets has been even greater than in the U.S.

In the longer term, there is a lot more to consider than the 5% to 6% drop in the U.S. markets today. Since September 2007, the New York Investing meetup has pointed out how the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have attempted to prevent and cover up economic problem before the presidential election. Well, the election is now over. Some of these actions may now start to unravel. If so, we shall begin to see this in the next month or two.

NEXT: When Stimulus Ceases to Be Stimulating

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.