Why You Must Invest for Inflation From Now On

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Fed made history today by announcing an open-ended money printing policy — a policy heretofore unseen outside of history's hyperinflation havens. The news conference that followed the announcement revealed a central bank acting out of extreme desperation.

While the Fed is doing another round of quantitative easing, QE3 is not the same as QE2. The previous QE involved the purchase of U.S. Treasuries. This time around, the Fed is buying MBSs (mortgage-backed securities). In QE1, various types of securities were bought. The previous QEs also had specific limits to the amount of money that was going to be printed whereas QE3 doesn't. QE3 is supposed to be ongoing until somewhat after the economy and employment situation have been improving for a while. How long that will be is anybody's guess.

Despite several questions in the press conference that followed the announcement, Bernanke made only vague statements about how the Fed would determine when enough money printing was enough. The purchase of mortgage-backed securities is likely to continue for some time because doing so is supposed to reduce unemployment. How that will work is not clear other than perhaps reducing unemployment in the construction industry. The Fed's actions should lower already historically low mortgage rates and Bernanke specifically stated more than once that getting the price of homes up was one of his major goals (he seems to have forgotten that the global financial collapse in 2008 was the result of the collapse of the housing bubble).

Anticipating the obvious objections, Bernanke tried to head off the major criticisms of the Fed's new plan at the beginning of his news conference. While he admitted that the Fed's action hurt savers and would make it difficult to prepare for retirement, he said that if you don't  have a job you wouldn't have any money to save anyway. So, apparently the large majority of people who have a job should risk having their retirement unfunded in order to pursue Bernanke's high risk policies that have been tried for the last five years, but haven't worked. I wouldn't have been surprised if a couple of retired people were brought up to the podium and Bernanke kicked them a few times to emphasize his point.

Bernanke also denied that the new round of money printing will cause inflation. The basis of his argument was that the members of the FOMC aren't prediction inflation in their projections, so obviously it's not going to happen (these are the same people that failed to foresee the subprime crisis coming). Also Bernanke claimed inflation has been around 2% for years, so there is no problem. Even a casual perusal of commodity prices since 2009 shows increases of 100%, 150%, 200% and sometimes more however. It is true the government isn't reporting inflation, but that isn't the same as it doesn't exist. The head of the Weimar German central bank also claimed inflation wasn't a problem as he printed more and more money. Eventually, inflation reached 300 million percent.

One of the real eye-openers of the Bernanke news conference was his admitting the impotency of the Fed and monetary policy. Over and over again Bernanke stated that the Fed's actions were, "not a panacea". He said that, "We [the Fed] can't solve the problems by ourselves". He also emphasized that the Fed's, "tools are not so powerful that they can solve the problem". If the chances of success are so limited, why is the Fed taking a course of action that could have serious negative consequences for the American people?

In addition to his desire to reinflate the housing bubble, Bernanke was also proud that when the Fed speaks, economic forecasters change their numbers and that, "markets respond to [the Fed's] guidance".  This was a blatant admission that the Fed purposely manipulates the stock and bond markets and financial news. Obviously, this destruction of free market mechanisms is not something that he considers shameful, even though this represents a major power grab on the part of the Fed.

Bernanke was much more coy however when the question of whether or not the Fed's money printing decision was base on political considerations. One reporter mentioned that Romney was not planning on reappointing Bernanke and asked if the policy shift was an attempt to help reelect President Obama. Bernanke denied this of course, his voice almost breaking when he stammered out, "our decisions are based entirely on the state of the economy." I must admit that I am personally surprised that the Fed did this before the election because this question is only going to be the beginning and the Fed has now made itself an ongoing issue in the presidential campaign. I didn't think Bernanke was so foolish to take this risk, but obviously I overestimated his political awareness.

Earlier this month, ECB head Mario Draghi promised unlimited bond buying. This is different from what the Fed is doing because those purchases are supposed to be sterilized (new liquidity put in is neutralized by liquidity being removed). Many people however believe that the ECB will have to engage in money printing despite its claims. Added to the Fed, this means inflation investments will have a bid under them for some time to come.  Investors should be looking at gold and silver, energy and agriculture. Ironically, shorting Treasury bonds also look like a good bet now as well, since the Fed is not buying them as part of its QE program (Operation Twist though will be going on to the end of 2012 however and this acts to lower interest rates around the 7 to 10-year maturity level so be careful). Keep buying as long as the Fed keeps printing.


Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Retail Sales and Employment Not as Good as First Reported

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There has much cheerleading in the mainstream press lately about the improving employment situation and strong 2011 holiday retail sales. Just released figures indicate it may have been much ado about nothing.

Retailers depend on the holiday season for their yearly profits. Major efforts were made in November to get people to start buying early. This worked and retail sales were up 0.4% during the month. Strong early numbers don't necessarily mean overall numbers will be greater however. It can simply mean that buying activity was frontloaded and the later numbers will then be weak. This is exactly what happened. Retail sales were up a whopping 0.1% in December (retail sales are not adjusted for inflation, the number would be negative if it had been).

Looking inside the report shows how incredibly weak the consumer is. Excluding autos, which are highly volatile, retail sales were 0.2% lower -- the first drop since May 2010. Core retail sales, which exclude autos, gasoline and building materials were down 0.1%. Even though it was the height of the holiday buying season, spending at electronic and appliance stores was down 3.9% and spending at department stores was down 0.2%. Once again, if the numbers had been adjusted for inflation they would have been even worse.

So how come U.S. consumers aren't spending more now that the employment situation is supposedly getting better?  Well, maybe it's because it isn't. The big news lately has been the declining weekly claims which have fallen below the traditional 400,000 per week that indicates recession. However, for the first week of 2012 they came in at 399,000 -- back at recession levels. This was up from the 372,000 reported the previous week (three states including mega-sized California didn't send in their claims numbers for this report).  Of course, the mainstream press blew the trumpets about the "good", but highly questionable, 372,000 number, just as it did for the 200,000 jobs that were allegedly created in December 2011.

Among these jobs were 42,000 new messenger positions. While it's more likely that 42,000 messengers were hired in December than 42,000 nuclear physicists, that doesn't mean it is believable. Messengers work in a field with declining employment. The December jobs report has been criticized as having "statistical adjustment" problems. Non-statisticians generally refer to this as lying about the numbers. Of course, the appearance of suddenly improving economic news (not to be confused with an economy that is actually improving) at the beginning of a presidential election year should not be surprising.

As the election season heats up, there will be a desire for the government to report that economic conditions are better than they actually are.  This does not mean the news will necessarily be good, it will just be better than it actually is. Expect the bad news to come out after the November election.  Until then, invest with caution. 

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Brother, Can You Spare a Job?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The employment report was released this morning and the news can only be described as devastating. There was a loss of 533,000 jobs in November, the most this year so far. This was also the biggest drop in 34 years, when 602,000 jobs were lost in December 1974. On top of November's reduction in jobs, September and October was revised sharply downward with losses those months much worse than initially reported. Despite the large drop in jobs, the official unemployment rate rose only to 6.7% last month from 6.5% the month before. Unemployment would have been even higher if government statisticians hadn't decided that 422,000 people had left the labor force. Still, even this 'modified' figure is at a 15-year high.

The unusually low reported unemployment rate isn't the only thing in the report that should make you suspicious either. It is obvious that the government grossly and conveniently underestimated job losses before the presidential election where the state of the economy was a major issue damaging Republican electoral prospects. The September figures were the last ones reported before the election. Initially, there was a loss of 159,000 jobs, which is pretty bad, but not nearly as bad as what really happened. Right after the election, this number was revised downward to a loss of 284,000 jobs. In today's report it was revised downward further to a loss of 403,000 jobs. Total yearly jobs losses reported before the election were 760,000. Today that number is being reported as 1.9 million - a rather steep increase and much more dismal picture than voters were given just one month ago when they went to the polls.

Job losses last month were widespread, hitting factories, construction companies, financial firms, retailers, leisure and hospitality, and others industries. Nevertheless, there were job gains in government, education (mostly government as well) and health care. Every bad employment report this year has in fact shown an increase in government employment, even though many states, local governments, and school districts are severely strapped financially. If you extrapolated these increases out, you would also see that they indicate in the long-term we will all be government employees. For some reason, I have trouble finding them credible.

All in all it can be said that the deteriorating employment picture is the result of two factors. First, the U.S. economy is indeed falling apart and already in deep recession. Secondly, a lot of deterioration in the employment picture that is being reported now, has actually taken place over the last several months. The U.S. government is just admitting the truth. Of course, the past figures may be somewhat worse than even what we have been told so far.

NEXT: Tribune Bankruptcy Has it All

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Stock Market's Early Returns

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While the election doesn't appear to have resulted in the worse possible outcome for Wall Street, what did occur was interpreted by the market negatively enough to cause a small crash today. So far Obama has won the presidency by a 7% plurality, although based on turnout estimates several million votes seem to be missing from the tally. The Democrats have picked up at least five seats in the Senate and have solidified control, but the filibuster proof majority remains elusive for them. Four seats - Georgia, Minnesota, Oregon, and Alaska - are still undecided however. Currently the Republican is ahead by 500 votes or less in Minnesota and Alaska and recounts will be taking place. All the ballots haven't yet been counted in Oregon's mail-in-only election, but it looks like the Democrat will win when they are. As of now, Georgia is heading toward a run-off election next month because neither candidate got 50% of the vote. Alaska would have to have another election as well if convicted felon Stephens wins, since he will probably be expelled from the senate by early next year at the latest. Current tallies indicate that the Democrats picked up around 20 seats in the House and will have between an 81 an 88 vote majority.

Inexplicably the market rallied while the voting was taking place, with the Dow closing up 305 points or 3.3%. This was the biggest rally since 1980 when the market was first opened on election day. The previous biggest rally was a 1.2% gain in 1984 when Reagan defeated Mondale in a massive landslide that was universally predicted. Today, after seeing the returns all the major U.S. stock indices dropped 5% to 6%. Previously this would have been a headline news, but a drop of this magnitude has become commonplace in the last two months of high volatility trading.

Volatile markets are of course not healthy markets. A 305 point Dow rally yesterday, followed by a 487 point or 5.1% drop today should not inspire confidence. The S&P and Nasdaq were down a slightly greater percentage and the Russell was down the most with a 5.7% drop. Oil dropped $5.23 a barrel after an even bigger rally on election day. When Japan opened, the Nikkei followed the U.S. markets down, ending its morning session with a drop of 5.7%. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong was having an even bigger drop, while the Shanghai Composite hit a two-year low before attempting a recovery. Like the Nikkei, Korea and Taiwan were experiencing crash level drops at mid-day while Singapore and Australia were down somewhat less than 5%. If anything, volatility in Asian markets has been even greater than in the U.S.

In the longer term, there is a lot more to consider than the 5% to 6% drop in the U.S. markets today. Since September 2007, the New York Investing meetup has pointed out how the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have attempted to prevent and cover up economic problem before the presidential election. Well, the election is now over. Some of these actions may now start to unravel. If so, we shall begin to see this in the next month or two.

NEXT: When Stimulus Ceases to Be Stimulating

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Election's Impact on the Markets

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In a perfectly free market, politics has no impact on trading and prices. The U.S. not only doesn't have a free market, but since the credit crisis began has veered increasingly toward dominant government control of the financial system. The election tomorrow is not likely to reduce that control, but instead shift it to other areas. The Bush administration has created de facto corporate socialism in the U.S. with the Wall Street bailout bill being the culminating event. An Obama administration will change the emphasis of programs toward the individual. Expect profitability for financial companies to be squeezed for at least the next four years and probably beyond as a result.

Obama is not only going to win tomorrow, but is likely to receive a mandate larger than the 6% plurality predicted on average by the polls (the New York Investing meetup predicted an 8% margin last Wednesday, the win could be even larger). While the presidential election is a forgone conclusion, a filibuster proof senate is still up for grabs. Legislation can be delayed or even stopped by a filibuster in the senate, unless 60 votes can be put together to end it. The chances of the Democrats achieving this goal have increased substantially in the last week. Three more Republican senators, - Dole in North Carolina, Coleman in Minnesota, and recently convicted felon, Stevens in Alaska - look to be in trouble. Chamblis in Georgia is still incorrectly considered safe, although his support took a nosedive after he voted for the bailout bill, by the political pundits. Early voting in Georgia indicates a well-above average African American vote in the election so far and this will defeat him if the numbers stay high. Seats could be lost by the Republicans in Mississippi and Kentucky as well. Whatever happens with the senate seats on election night, don't expect any improvement in 2010, since most seats that will be up then are now held by Republicans and a shift toward the Republican party that year would only manage to preserve the balance of power that was established in 2008.

A Democratic lock on the election process will not be considered a positive by the U.S. stock market. Even as of today though, it doesn't appear that this has been priced in. Only the trading on Wednesday and to some extent on Tuesday (information from supposedly secret exit polls flows to the major Wall Street players) will let us know. Any sell off should help to firmly establish a market bottom. Failing to break the lows of October 10th in the days following the election should be interpreted as a confirmation that an intermediate term bottom was already put in (the absolute bottom could be a year or even several years off however).

Voters don't leave the comfort of their homes to stand in line for four or more hours to express an opinion if they are happy with the status quo. This behavior has been seen throughout the United States in early voting and indicates an electorate that is angry and demanding change. Turnout is heading toward a record percentage for a modern U.S. election (ignore all comparisons before 1920 when women didn't have the right to vote), which would be anything above 135,000,000 votes. Since there are 187,000,000 registered voters (out of an eligible population of 213 million) as of the latest count, this target is more than possible. Expect the political shift that is taking place to create a shift as to what works in the markets as well.

NEXT: The Stock Market's Early Returns

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Start Looking for Capitulation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Another market bloodbath took place in Asia last night. The Nikkei fell a further 6.4% and took out its 2003 low of 7603 to close at 7162. This is now a 26 year low and it's not clear that even 18 years of selling has been enough to establish a long-term stock market bottom in Japan. The surging Yen is crushing exporters there. Drops were even bigger elsewhere, with the Hang Seng in Hong Kong falling 12.7% to close at 11,016. The 10,000 support level, broken during the Asian financial crisis in 1997, seems to be acting as a magnet for the index. The Philippines market, after dropping 12.3%, halted trading. Only Korea was up slightly after it cut interest rates three-quarters of a point, the largest cut ever there. The U.S. Fed, which is meeting this week, almost certainly took notice.

While the Yen is going up against the dollar, the euro continues its fall and hit 1.2461 in overnight trading. Oil hit 62.20 and is now down 57% from its mid-July high. The drop has been so sharp and so quick that gas prices in the U.S. have fallen 53 cents in only two weeks - just in time for the November election, where the high cost of fuel was a major issue eroding voter support for the Republican party. The U.S. dollar's strong rally against almost all currencies other than the Yen, engineered by central banks acting in concert starting this summer, is partially responsible for the fall in oil prices. Their dollar support activities have been so 'successful' that the trade weighted dollar was above 87.50 early this morning. If the rally continues, this could cause U.S. exports to drop off a cliff, as they did in the early stages of the Great Depression, and take the economy with them. The American financial media, which published one story after another about the beneficial effects of a falling dollar when the U.S. currency was sliding, has so far ignored the flip side of this story.

European markets, down in the 4% to 6% range in early trading, started paring their losses by mid-day. The U.S. markets did not open down that much, but it's the close that will be important. The Treasury announced today that it would begin distributing it gift bags of money from the Wall Street bailout bill to banks and this may be helping to limit selling. The U.S. Fed will be meeting this Tuesday and Wednesday and a 50 basis point rate cut is expected - more is possible and that would rally the market if it occurs. The New York Investing meetup predicted in fall 2007 that the Fed would move rates close to zero and this prediction seems to be coming to fruition.

Stocks are extremely oversold and resistance to further selling has been evident for the last few days of trading. Buying on any major drop should now be considered. It is likely that soon some event will take place that will rally the market and its beaten down segments. While the financials may still be overpriced (doesn't mean they can't rally substantially in the short term), sectors like the precious metal miners have been fallen to truly bargain level prices. Buying at a real discount is always a good way to make money in any market.

NEXT: Short Covering Rallies, Explosive and Brief

Daryl Montgomery

Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Landslide Elections and the U.S. Stock Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

There seem to be only two things that Americans voters will not forgive their politicians for. In the case of the President it is a failed economy, which led to a Democratic landslide in 1932 and a Republican landslide in 1980. While congressional voting is strongly affected by the economy as well, there is an additional factor of failing to deliver on a political party's core promises. When the Democrats couldn't pass a health care bill (something they had campaigned on for almost 50 years) in 1993, the voters turned on them en mass. This year, there is not only economic turmoil going into the election, but many Republicans in congress abandoned one of their party's most fundamental principals, fiscal conservatism, by supporting the Wall Street bailout bill. Conditions are ripe for a major political shift.

Presidential landslides are usually preceded by shifts in Congress two years earlier. In 1930, the Republicans, who had totally controlled Washington for the proceeding 10 years, lost 52 House seats and 8 Senate seats as the economy started to fall headlong into the Depression. Even with these losses, Republicans still had slight control of the U.S. senate and only lost their majority in the House after further defeats in special elections. While the U.S. economy was allegedly in good shape in 2006 (at least according to the official highly manipulated government figures), Republicans lost 30 House seats and 6 Senate seats in the election that year. This gave Democrats solid control of the House and a bare majority in the senate.

As bad as 1930 was for the Republicans, it was nothing like the political bloodbath that followed in 1932 when they lost 101 seats in the House and 12 seats in the senate. Best guesstimates as of now is that Democrats will pick up another 30 House seats this November. Interestingly, as many as 12 senate seats could also shift from Republican to Democratic hands this year, although the Democrats would only need 9 seats to have a filibuster proof majority. There is probably a slightly less than 50% chance of this happening, so it isn't a done deal yet. Wall Street would not react positively to this outcome and it has almost certainly not been factored into stock prices as of yet.

As for the Presidential election, Obama is clearly ahead of McCain and some perennial Republican strongholds like Indiana, North Carolina, North Dakota, and Virginia may go his way in addition to almost every swing state. Obama has the advantage in ad spending and field operations. Most polls show him way ahead in the race. While there are a few that don't, closer examination of them reveal that they are as statistically suspect as the U.S. governments inflation and GDP figures.

So what has a major political shift said about the prospects for the U.S. stock market in the past? The stock market actually bottomed before the 1932 election and entered a multi-year rally period after FDR's inauguration in March. In 1980, Regan was elected while a recession was already underway (as is the case in 2008) and another recession immediately followed that one.
Two years later though, U.S. stocks started an 18 year secular bull market. Generally, things have to be very bad economically for there to be a large change in the previous U.S. political balance. By the time this happens, the worst is likely to be over soon thereafter.

NEXT: Start Looking for Capitulation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The House of Cards Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Housing continues to deteriorate. There are now 12 million homes in the U.S. with mortgages that exceed their value. This pool of houses which is particularly vulnerable to abandonment and foreclosure represents almost a quarter of all mortgaged residential properties . By the end of 2008, it is estimated that there will be a million bank owned properties for sale, which would represent a third of homes on the market. The situation is already much worse in trend leader California, where over 50% of existing home sales were foreclosed properties last month. Median prices there have dropped 34% from the high so far. The rest of the U.S. could follow California, although increased government efforts to prop up the housing market are trying to prevent further erosion.

Last quarter 766,000 U.S. home owners received at least one foreclosure notice. Only six states accounted for a majority of foreclosure activity - Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, and Ohio. The last four of these states are battlegrounds in the presidential election and Arizona would be too if McCain didn't represent it in the senate (nevertheless McCain's lead in the polls there is surprisingly small even though Arizona is one of the states most likely to support a Republican candidate for president). Foreclosures were worse in the beginning of the quarter and the rate even declined by 12% in September. While it looks like the number of foreclosure notices will be lower in the future, this won't be taking place because of improvements in the housing market.

The rate is being lowered by new laws have been enacted in a number of states to delay the repossession process and the FHA is attempting to renegotiate loan terms for a number of mortgage holders at risk. Foreclosure statistics are indeed very much affected by the ease of foreclosure which varies by state and should not be considered as an absolute indication of the strength of a state's housing market. New York for instance currently has a low foreclosure rate because it is necessary to go to court first and this means a foreclosure can take well over a year, longer if the judge doesn't wish to be cooperative. The FDIC is also trying to delay or prevent foreclosures. The first thing they did when they took over IndyMac was to stop all foreclosures and they are continuing to do so.

Delay does not mean preventing the inevitable however, it usually only means it only takes more time to get there. U.S. housing was in a bubble and prices became way extended on the upside. They are going to have to come down at least to the long-term mean - and we still have a long way to go to get there - before a sustainable recovery in real estate is possible. This will be an important precondition to a healthy economy as well. A look at the past suggests this linkage. Housing prices fell approximately 50% nationally in the U.S. between 1930 and 1940. The economy wasn't in such great shape then either.

NEXT: Black Friday Panic Grips World Markets

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.