U.S. Financial System Gets Its Own Stress Test

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Banks failures kept climbing and the Asset Back Security market completely froze up. While it sounds like a grim description of the height of the Credit Crisis, it was actually the week of July 19th.

In little reported news, there was no issuance of asset backed securities (ABS) last week. Large companies rely on this type of financing to fund their short term needs. The collapse of this market in the fall of 2008 was one of the key reasons that economic activity ground to a halt. Recently, everything looked OK for the ABS market. During the ten weeks prior to July 19th average issuance was $1.83 billion per week. Then suddenly it was zero.

The overnight disappearance of funding was an unintended consequence of the new financial 'reform' bill. One of the provisions of the bill made the rating agencies liable for their ratings - a laudable idea. However, there was no provision on the other side that prevented them from taking money for their ratings and then refusing to have them made public, which the rating agencies promptly did in the ABS market. Companies were already required by law to have their ABS paper rated before financial reform - essentially giving the ratings agencies a government enforced duopoly. So without ratings nothing could be sent to market. Even Ford Motor had to pull a major offering. To unfreeze the market, the SEC promptly ruled that ABS paper could be sold without a rating for the next six months. This too could have unintended consequences.

The Credit Crisis was also being revisited with a U.S. banking system that still looks shaky. So far this year, 103 U.S. banks have failed compared to 65 at the same time last year. At the current rate, failures could exceed 200 in 2010. This is roughly on par on a percentage basis with the worse period of the Savings and Loan Crisis. However, the FDIC, which insures bank deposits, didn't go under during the Savings and Loan Crisis. This will happen this time. There are even rumors that the FDIC is delaying taking over insolvent banks to delay its own insolvency. These rumors are probably not true because doing so wouldn't buy the FDIC that much time. Expect the federal government to bail it out with a 'loan' or some other 'line of credit'.

The problems that surfaced during the Credit Crisis have obviously not all been solved. Investors should assume that the after effects will have to be dealt with for years to come. Government solutions for dealing with these problems may themselves in turn cause other problems. The corruption in the system certainly hasn't gone away. The ratings agencies gave baskets of subprime loans triple A ratings and now they have refused to let their ratings be used for asset backed securities because of potential liability. So how accurate do think their ratings are now?   And why does the U.S. government force companies to pay them for the ratings if companies aren't guaranteed anything in return for their money?  If this type of activity took place between two businesses, it would be called an extortion racket. The FDIC forcing banks to prepay three years of deposit insurance premiums could be viewed the same way.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

As U.S. Banks Deteriorate, Obama Proposes New Regulation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


President Obama proposed placing new limits on the size and activities of big U.S. banks on January 21st. The new plan, known as the Volcker Rule, would effectively prevent banks from owning hedge funds and private equity funds and seeks to place curbs on the market share of liabilities for any given firm. It follows last weeks proposed new tax on the big banks to recoup losses from the 2008 bailout. The administration apparently hadn't informed Wall Street about the impending news. The U.S. market was caught off guard and predictably sold off sharply with the banks leading the way. The European and Asian markets sold off in sympathy.

Recent earnings on the big banks have shown that their loan portfolios are continuing to deteriorate. Fourth quarter regional bank earnings confirm that little if any improvement has taken place since the depths of the Credit Crisis. BB&T (BBT) earnings fell 36% last quarter and its provision for credit losses were $725 million versus $197 million in the fourth quarter of 2008. Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) losses on its commercial real estate portfolio were $258 million in the fourth quarter versus $169 million in the third quarter. SunTrust (STI) non-accrued loans are now $5.40 billion, down $42 million from the previous quarter, still very high and barely getting better.

While it is possible something may eventually come from the Obama proposals, investors shouldn't expect that they are a done deal.  In his signature, it's not my job approach, the president appeared to be leaving crucial details for his bank oversight plan to be hashed out by Congress - an institution that is perennially dysfunctional and which is viewed almost universally unfavorably by the American electorate (one recent poll found that only 21% of voters view congress favorably). This is how Obama handled his intended health care reform, which has turned into a giant boondoggle for the administration. Obama has also taken this tack with his proposed consumer protection agency that has gotten caught in partisan wrangling on the Hill. If Obama's intention is to just talk about something, but make sure nothing ever happens, he seems to have found the magic formula.

Obama took office right after the lowest point of the Credit Crisis. Like any new president, he had enormous political capital at that moment, but did very little with it. He was president for a year before he said in his press conference proposing new bank regulation that the banks nearly wrecked the economy by taking "huge, reckless risks in pursuit of quick profits and massive bonuses."  Unfortunately, we are still suffering from the after-effects of the Credit Crisis and this will be the case for some years to come. Mortgage defaults are still a major problem for the banks and a burgeoning commercial loan crisis is now taking place. In 2009, 140 U.S. banks went under, the largest number since the Savings & Loan Crisis. The administration's efforts to handle banking problems so far have been ineffective at best. It would be preferable if the Obama administration solved the current serious problems first rather than concentrating on some distant future situation.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: The Case Against Reappointing Ben Bernanke

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Future U.S. Bailouts - FHA, FDIC, PBGC, U.S. States

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

There is no end in sight for U.S. bailouts stemming from the Credit Crisis. Once you've bailed out wealthy Wall Street bankers (and there are a handful of Federal Reserve programs for this in addition to $700 billion TARP program), it isn't politically tenable to say no to pensioners, savers, homeowners. and local governments. It should be kept in mind that the Credit Crisis didn't create the problems, but merely exposed the rot in the system that had been there for many years. As Warren Buffett most famously said, "you only know who's swimming naked when the tide goes out". Well, a lot of U.S. government operations have been swimming naked for years and the Credit Crisis caused the tide to go out.

The problems center around housing, banking, pensions, and government operations that don't have the money printing ability of the federal government. The government already nationalized massive housing loan entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008 and these have become bottomless pits for government aid. Fannie lost $18.9 billion in the third quarter of this year and requested an additional $15 billion in funding. Things would be even worse, if much of the loans that had previously been handled by Fannie and Freddie weren't now being insured by the FHA (Federal Housing Administration). The FHA is now backing loans that would have made a crooked subprime mortgage broker blush in the heyday of the housing bubble. When it comes to getting FHA insurance these days, bad credit, a spotty work history, and even a previous foreclosure aren't deal breakers. Not surprisingly, FHA finances are spiraling downhill fast and warnings about a need for a bailout are already becoming louder.

The FDIC has temporarily solved its need for a bailout, with temporarily being the operative word. On November 12th the FDIC mandated that banks pay three years of their insurance premiums up front. This will provide the FDIC's insolvent bank deposit insurance program with an immediate cash infusion of $45 billion. Unfortunately, the FDIC itself estimates that its funding needs will be $100 billion in the next four years. Assuming they only need that amount (which is possibly very optimistic), they will still have a serious short fall. There have been 123 U.S bank failures as of mid-November and the ones on November 13th cost the FDIC approximately a billion dollars. That's for just one week. At that rate, the FDIC would be out of money again in 45 weeks.

The PBGC (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation), a government chartered company that insures U.S. pensions is another operation which is heading toward a bailout. In its 35 years of operation, it has lost money in 29. Losses have even taken place when the U.S. economy was strong and the stock market rallied. In bad years, the PBGC loses even more money. So far in 2009, it has taken over 144 failed pension programs compared to 67 in 2008. It was $22 billion in the red this year. According to an inspector general's report, the PBGC's former director was alleged to have had improper contacts with Wall Street. When questioned by a congressional panel, he took the Fifth Amendment (refusing to answer because it might incriminate him). Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives also had serious ethical problems. Corruption and bailouts seem to go hand in hand.

While California's budget woes are well known, there are nine other U.S. states that are in serious financial trouble and an additional ten not far behind them. California has a $121 billion budget gap and is resorting to IOUs to make payments. According to the Pew Center, the nine other states in serious trouble are Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Florida (states hit hardest by the housing downturn along with California), Rhode Island, Oregon, New Jersey, Illinois and Wisconsin. High unemployment and reduced business activity have caused tax receipts to plummet and are behind the current fiscal distress. There is little evidence the problem is getting better despite claims by the federal authorities and mainstream economists that the recession is over. The federal government has the same problem as the states, but it just prints money to make ends meet. While the feds can bail out the states, who's going to bail out the U.S. when money printing doesn't work anymore?

NEXT: The Art of Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Recovery? Don't Bank on It

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

As of Friday, 98 U.S. banks have failed this year and the FDIC Deposit Insurance fund is on the brink of insolvency. The fund now covers only 0.22% of U.S. bank deposits, whereas a 1.15% minimum is mandated by law. At the end of second quarter 416 banks were on the FDIC's troubled list (this number should be updated in about another month), so the steady drip of money leaking out of the fund could turn into a torrent. Commercial loan defaults are the current crisis hitting the system and this problem has just begun. While you may be surprised that this could be happening after Fed Chair Ben Bernanke has repeatedly told us that the banking system was saved last year, a government report released today indicated that the public had been lied to about just this very subject.

A special inspector general investigating the handling of the bank rescue program TARP in the fall of 2008 found that then Treasury Secretary Paulson and other officials falsely claimed that the first 9 institutions getting funds were sound. Paulson specifically stated, "These are healthy institutions ...". At the time, Merrill Lynch was actually collapsing. Citibank and Bank of America subsequently required significant additional funds to stay afloat. The report was criticized by Assistant Treasury Secretary Herbert Allison Jr., who now heads the bailout program for the government. Allison maintains that any critique of the announcements made a year ago should take into consideration the unprecedented circumstances facing financial regulators at the time. In other words, the government feels that it is justified in blatantly lying to the public if a crisis is taking place. Let me repeat that: the government feels that it is justified in blatantly lying to the public if a crisis is taking place. Let me follow that up by pointing out that there is both a credit and economic crisis still taking place.

The FDIC itself has given us more than enough reason to think the U.S. banking system has not actually been rescued. Other than the domino like collapse of smaller and midsized banks that is now occuring, the FDIC's figures state that in aggregate U.S banks lost $3.7 billion in the second quarter, even though almost every large U.S. bank reported major profits. Of course the major banks have received massive injections of government aid, while the smaller banks have not. This is a move afoot to try to inject TARP funds into smaller banks to prevent defaults on a mass scale.

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, what is taking place in the U.S. now is very similar to what took place in Japan in the 1990s. Japan had a banking system dominated by a small number of large institutions. The first 9 recipients of TARP funds controlled 75% of the assets in the U.S. banking system. In both cases, banks were allowed to become so large that a failure of even one of them endangered the entire financial system. Japan has propped up its banking system for two decades now and the cost has been an economy unable to grow unless there is government stimulus. Personally, I am waiting to see what the U.S. government is going to do to rev up the economy next quarter now that the Cash for Clunkers program has expired.

NEXT: Gold! Record High Knocking on Heaven's Door

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Enron Accounting and GDP; FDIC's Money Shortage

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Second quarter GDP revisions were out this morning and they were unchanged from the down 1.0% in the first reporting. The government claims that while some components of the GDP numbers declined, increases in other components offset the losses. Components revised upward included government spending (what a surprise). State and local government spending was supposedly up 3.6% (federal spending up 11%) even though over 30 state governments are now considered to be in serious financial trouble. In a separate report, the FDIC is once again about to run out of money because of the increasing rate of bank failures that are taking place even though Fed Chair Bernanke has told us repeatedly that the financial system has been fixed.

While the state and local government spending numbers are suspicious to say the least, far more suspicious is the corporate profits component of the GDP report. Before-tax corporate profits supposedly increased $67.6 billion or by 5.7% quarterly. This was the biggest increase in four years and even larger than the 5.3% gain in the first quarter. You may be wondering how can corporate profits increase by large amounts during the worst recession since the 1930s? Quite simply, they can't. Even worse, proof of the inaccuracy of these numbers is supported by the net cash flow figures in the GDP report. These fell by $26.9 billion. Companies that are actually making money generate cash. Those who are lying about making money don't. This is what happened with Enron. It claimed to have substantial profits, but its cash flow indicated that it didn't. While this smoking gun was right there is the published figures, Wall Street and the mainstream financial media talked up the stock almost to the day that the company declared bankruptcy.

Other components from the report indicate an economy that is in extremely bad shape. Amazingly, even though corporations are making those huge profits, business investment fell 10.9% after plunging at a record depression level 39.2% annual rate in the first quarter. Another impossible statistic in the report is disposable income for consumers. The GDP report claims this went up 3.8% despite the severe recession. However, according to the report the savings rate rose 5.0%, which means that this increased fantasy income wasn't flowing into the economy. Exports, which the Fed and economists have pointed to as one of the cornerstones of the 'resurgent' economy, fell 5%. Imports fell 15.1%. Collapsing trade is a sign of a sick economy. Even though we have heard repeatedly from the media and the Fed that the U.S. real estate market has bottomed, investments in housing fell for the 14th consecutive quarter, dropping at a 22.8% annual rate -that's some recovery all right.

Also contradicting the government's 'economy is getting better' PR blitz, is the continuing failures of U.S. banks. This problem hasn't been solved, it has merely been swept under the rug. The FDIC's deposit fund will be running out of money sometime later this year. It would have run out of money last year if it had to pay off for either the Washington Mutual or Wachovia failures. Both were handled outside the system with the U.S. Treasury making guarantees for the acquiring banks. So far 81 banks have failed this year and the number of banks on the FDIC's troubled list is now 416 (up from 305 at the end of the first quarter). This is the largest number since the Savings and Loan Crisis. Banks insured by the FDIC swung to a total quarterly loss of $3.7 billion in Q2. It looks like we can expect a lot more bank failures in the future.

NEXT: Commodities, the Dollar and More Government Fantasy

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Consumer Confidence Game and Housing's False Bottom

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Signs of a "resurgent economy" are everywhere - at least if you believe the reporting of the mainstream media. The "recession appears to be over" and "the U.S. economic ship is finally righting itself" according to one 'expert' after another quoted in news articles. Examination of the data backing up these claims indicates the truth might be quite different. While there was supposedly 'good news' on consumer confidence and housing prices yesterday (as long as you didn't look too closely at the numbers), it was little noticed that the White House raised its projected budget deficits to a total $9 trillion between 2010 and 2019. The budget deficits for the next decade will only be this good as long as the economy is growing at a robust pace and inflation remains unusually low. This is the most optimistic possibility imaginable, with imagine being the key concept here.

The Conference Board released its monthly consumer confidence survey yesterday. It came in at 54.1 and was up from 47.4 in July. The results are very different form the University of Michigan survey which had consumer confidence plummeting only a couple of weeks ago. What caused the big rise? Consumer's view of the current economy are still highly negative, but they see a rosier future - especially after hearing how the economy is recovering every time the turn on the TV or open a newspaper. Surprisingly after being bombarded (perhaps brainwashed is a better term) with news about an improving economy, more survey respondents when questioned whether they thought the economy was going to get better said yes. To put the 54.1 number in context, the average number over time is 95. A robust economy has a number well over 100, so we are about at half that level.

According to Case-Shiller, U.S. housing prices have now gone up two months in a row - May and June. This got huge coverage in the mainstream media yesterday. Did this actually happen? Well, not exactly, if you're a stickler for details. The Case-Shiller numbers are not seasonally adjusted and late spring is usually the strongest part of the year for home sales. If you seasonally adjust the numbers, it turns out May was actually negative. June was still positive, but you would need a magnifying glass to see the number it was so small. Suppose you adjusted the numbers for the $8000 tax credit the federal government was giving first time buyers? Well, the June number would sort of be negative too. What about year over year numbers? Well for the entire U.S. they're down 15%. From the peak there has been a 30% drop so far. The 20-city index, which is the one that was up in May and June has fallen 45.3% since the 2006 top. Yeah, those numbers really scream recovery.

The underpinnings for a housing recovery are also just not there. Colonial BancGroup just filed for bankruptcy. It was closed down by the FDIC about two weeks ago and was the sixth largest failure in U.S. bank history. A lot of bad mortgages did it in. The bank is under criminal investigation for accounting irregularities (you should wonder how many other banks may have engaged in similar behavior, but have not yet been found out). Bank of New York is its biggest creditor. Yes, the big banks have exposure to these medium and small banks. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp., one of the largest independent mortgage companies in the U.S. was also forced into bankruptcy as well because it relied on Colonial for its funding. Bank failures can have a lot of collateral damage. So far this year we are at 81 and counting. Despite the 'resurgent' economy and 'bottomed' real estate market, I have a feeling there's going to be a lot more.

NEXT: Enron Accounting and GDP; FDIC's Money Shortage

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke Reappointed, Court Order and FDIC

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke is going to be reappointed for another 4 year term. Obama decided to reappoint Bernanke because he wanted to keep together the team that had weathered the Credit Crisis, an administration official said. This is of course like reappointing the team that did such a 'good job' handling Hurricane Katrina. Just as Bush praised those incompetents, 'change you can believe in' Obama praised Bernanke for preventing another depression. Bernanke was first appointed by Bush and didn't foresee the Credit Crisis coming, nor did he respond appropriately once it did. There is of course also no evidence that another depression has been prevented . So far, it is just some fantasy that politicians inside the Beltway keep repeating to each other.

In other Fed related news, a federal court in New York has ordered the Fed make available information from 11 of its Credit Crisis programs to the public. The court ruled that the Fed improperly withheld records under the Freedom of Information law. Bloomberg News sued (kudos to them) and is trying to find out how much money was given to which banks. In its defense of the case, the Fed (which I would like to remind you is only a quasi-governmental entity - the big banks own stock in it and have their representatives sit on the Fed's regional board of directors) essentially maintained that it was above the law. Undermining our democratic system - just another example of the 'good job' that Ben Bernanke has been doing.

The FDIC is also in the news again. For some reason, even though the Credit Crisis is supposedly over and the economy is recovering U.S. bank failures are skyrocketing. The agency needs new bidders for failed banks because existing banks are now avoiding purchasing them. The FDIC's deposit insurance funds are also getting depleted. The FDIC is proposing a rule change that will allow private equity firms to buy failed banks and maintain capital ratios of 10% instead of 15%. This will of course make the failed banks likely to fail again - and I bet the private equity firms will scream for a government bailout when this happens. Indy Mac and Bank United were already sold to private equity firms earlier this year. Based on this news, we can presume that the FDIC is not using the Bernanke approach of threatening to fire any bank president that doesn't agree to the government's proposed takeover demands, as happened with Bank America. Since these banks are NOT too big to fail, they are not being directly nationalized as was AIG or indirectly nationalized as was the case with most of the big U.S. commercial banks and brokers. Undermining our capitalist system - just another example of the 'good job' that Ben Bernanke has done.

The biggest danger in any crisis is leadership that is oblivious and is in denial. The crisis only gets worse under such circumstances. Bernanke has been a disaster as a federal reserve chair by any criteria that you wish to measure his tenure by. Obama is not only totally ignorant of basic economics and devoid of any ideas for handling our current situation, but is even oblivious to what the current situation is. His actions remind me of Herbert Hoover's famous June 1930 press conference stating the Depression was over. Hoover was more than a decade early.

NEXT: Consumer Confidence Game and Housing's False Bottom

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Dollar,Stocks,Bernanke and Natural Gas

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. dollar fell below its breakdown point again on Friday. DXY, the ETF for the trade-weighted dollar, closed at 78.01 and spent much of the day trading in the 77 range. This is the second time the dollar has traded below the key breakdown point of 78.33. Last time it was below this price for 5 days. It's inability to stay above this level is a sign of weakness. Gold of course rallied and was as high as $957 during the day. It is once again trying to get back to the important $1000 breakout level.

As the dollar fell, stocks rallied. This has been a typical pattern since this March. In the larger scheme of things it is unusual however. For the first time since this phase of the rally began in July, volume was noticeably above average (average volume has been declining during the entire rally however). The rally has looked sickly so far because volume started out light and continually fell - a very negative pattern. It seems that if stocks rally, the U.S. dollar has to sell off and vice-a-versa. Something has to give soon.

What fueled the rally on Friday was existing home sales supposedly being up 7% and bullish comments by Ben Bernanke about how the recession is ending. The home sales figures are of course suspicious, but no amount of fantasy has managed to disturb the market rally so far. Bernanke, who has continually been wrong in his pronouncements on the Credit Crisis and recession is also being believed by the market for no apparent reason. Bernanke was incredibly self-congratulatory in his speech, giving the major central bankers full credit for saving the world from global recession. The proof that this has happened is minimal to say the least and exists mostly in manipulated government statistics that lack any credibility. Lost in the coverage was the failure of four more U.S. banks on Friday, including one with $13 billion in assets. So far this year 81 U.S. banks have failed, compared to 3 in 2007.

Natural gas is staying at its impossible price levels. The near-term futures contract fell as low as $2.75 toward the close on Friday. UNG was down 1.4%, while GAZ was up 1.3%. Their price movements should be almost identical and certainly they shouldn't move in opposite directions. But that is only true in reality, something which the market has become completely detached from.

NEXT: Bernanke Reappointed, Court Order and FDIC

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Peoples Republic of the U.S. - the AIG Bailout

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

In a socialist state, the government decides what a company is worth, not the market. The Federal Reserve clearly demonstrated this concept by purchasing almost 80% of the insurance giant AIG on Tuesday night, September 16th. The Fed paid over 10 times what the market said its stake in AIG was worth. It is not clear what U.S. laws allow for the nationalization of part of the insurance industry, nor what companies will be bought next now that this precedent has been set.

The final phase of AIG's death spiral began on Monday evening when the major credit agencies downgraded it. This credit downgrade required AIG to post billions of dollars of additional collateral for its mortgage derivative contracts - capital that AIG simple didn't have. The implications were far more serous than the public realized, since AIG is a central player in the CDS (credit default swaps) market and does business with almost every financial institution in the world. If AIG went under it would have been unable to pay off its CDS obligations and its counter parties would have unable to collect on its trades. It was estimated that a large number of hedge funds, and possibly some banks, would have gone under along with AIG.

Over the weekend AIG attempted to borrow $40 billion form the Federal Reserve. The Fed, originally set up to lend just to commercial banks, had no legal authority to lend to insurance companies. And even though it had extended its lending to broker-dealers in March and to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in July, it was reluctant to add insurance companies to the list. Then on Tuesday evening, the Fed (with support from the Treasury and President Bush) decided to extend its legal authority way beyond anything ever intended by agreeing to pump $85 billion into AIG. The media described this $85 billion as a 'loan' even though a 79.9% equity stake in AIG was being given in exchange (note to media: this is a stock purchase, not a loan). This is not for already existing AIG stock, but for newly issued AIG stock, so AIG will have to increase its outstanding amount of stock to five times its current level. This is a better deal for stockholders than usual, since they will be left with something, instead of being completely wiped out.

Based on Tuesday's closing price, AIG had a market cap of just over $10 billion dollars. In order to buy 80% of the company (which was worth $8 billion according to the market), the U.S. paid $85 billion or over 10 times the market price. Socialism leads to just such economic absurdities. Unless this is stopped, expect more of this in the future - and the permanently ruined economy that always follows.

NEXT: The Mega Move Up in Gold and Silver

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.