Showing posts with label Stiglitz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stiglitz. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

The Outlook for U.S. Treasuries

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Treasuries rallied the last week of February, which should be expected in a strong dollar environment. The rally in the U.S. dollar that started in early December (around the time that news of the problems in Greece began to surface) is ongoing and this will continue to be bullish for U.S. government bond prices and bearish for interest rates while it lasts. Inflation expectations cause the opposite outcome however. These two competing forces help explain why longer dated treasury interest rates have been trading in a bullish pattern since May 2009, but after a brief initial burst upward have traded sideways since that time. Current conditions indicate that a breakout rally to higher rates will probably have to wait a while longer.

In the intermediate and long-term, there are a number of significant risks to U.S. treasuries as well as most other government's bonds for that matter. Direct default is now on the table for smaller economies like Greece. Indirect default through inflation and currency devaluation is the risk for the major economies, such as the U.S., UK, and Japan. Some top mainstream economists, such as Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz and chief economics commentator for the Financial Times Martin Wolf, have recently made the case that the U.S. can't default on its debt because it owns a printing press. While this is technically true, it doesn't mean the paying back a bond investment with money that is worth much less than it was at the time when it was lent isn't a type of default. Why would anyone want to buy a government's bonds under such circumstances? Bill Gross, managing director at the world's largest bond fund PIMCO, refers to this type of default as stealth-default.  Gross has made the case that the risk of either type of default of government debt will cause government debt and corporate debt to have similar interest rates in the future. This would cause interest rates on government bonds to rise relative to corporates in the next few years.

In the short-term though bad economic news along with the strong dollar should keep U.S. treasury interest rates from rising. There have been a host of negative economic reports in the last couple of weeks on the banking sector, consumers, housing, and durable goods. The ISM Manufacturing Index released on March 1st was a disappointment and its component parts provide an excellent representation of the current push-me pull-you factors on U.S. interest rates. While manufacturing is still in an expansionary mode, new orders and production (indications of future activity) declined sharply and this is a bearish for interest rates. However, the prices paid component, which represents inflation, was the highest number in the February report as it was in the January report. This is bullish for interest rates.  

While the Federal Reserve has frequently announced that U.S. economy is in recovery, it has always followed this up with a statement about how it is going to keep interest rates low for a prolonged period of time. This would not be necessary in an economy that was actually recovering. When the Fed is talking out of both sides of its mouth, investors should pay attention to what it is doing and ignore what it is saying. A prolonged period of low interest rates is inflationary and this means long-term treasury rates will be going up. The only question is when.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: A Snapshot of the Energy Markets

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Economists and Governments Pave the Way for Global Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


In a just given speech at the London School of Economics, famed economist Joseph Stiglitz stated that the U.S. and UK should keep on spending and printing money to prop up their economies. Stiglitz apparently did not mention that recent hyperinflation basket case Zimbabwe followed this same approach. Meanwhile, plans for either an EU or German bailout of Greece continue to swirl about, taking the EU down the road of Moral Hazard and truly huge future bailouts for its member states. Government spending, bailouts, and money printing all go hand in hand.

The Stiglitz speech will be seen as a historically significant event. Stiglitz is not some minor, unknown economist, but is an insider's insider. Stiglitz is a winner of a Nobel Prize in Economics, former Chief Economist at the World Bank, former Chair of the Council of Economic Advisors, and has held economic professorships at a number of top universities. In his speech, he essentially stated that it is impossible for the US and UK to default on their debt because they have unlimited ability to print money. While this is certainly true, it is also simplistic, self-destructive, and immoral.

Money printing erodes the value of a currency and governments that engage in it are acting dishonestly since it is essentially legalized counterfeiting. Yes, they will give their lenders back the same nominal amount of money as was originally given to them, but lenders won't be able to buy as much with it as they could have previously. Lenders usually catch on to this scam pretty quickly and demand increasingly higher interest rates to compensate for the loss in value of the government bonds they are buying. Needing to pay more interest, the government then prints more money. An inflationary spiral results and the government can't stop the printing because doing so risks an economic collapse.

Stiglitz's approach is hardly original. This is the strategy that every country in history has followed that has experienced hyperinflation. Zimbabwe is only the most recent example; there are dozens of others in the last hundred years, with Greece being one of them. In all cases, the only thing that stopped the inflation was when the money printing stopped. This was most blatantly demonstrated in Zaire in 1997 when the government couldn't pay the outside printer of its currency. It received no new paper money and its hyperinflation ended abruptly. The Weimar Republic in 1920s Germany managed to stop its money printing by creating a new currency (a common solution) and backing it with hard assets. Top German economists during the Weimar Republic backed the government's money printing plans, just as Stiglitz is doing today for the U.S and the UK. 

While the U.S. and UK are well along on their money printing agendas, the EU has lagged behind. The impending bailout of Greece will help them catch up. Greece, in and of itself, is not that big. It is only 2% of the euro zone economy. The implications of a bailout for the future are enormous however. There are a number of other countries in the euro zone that will need their own bailouts. While Ireland, Portugal and Spain are on the list, the most serious problem by far is Italy. Italy is perhaps one year behind Greece in the deterioration of its financial condition. Its economy is approximately the same size as the UK's. How is it possible to bail out an economy that large?  How much money would have to be printed to accomplish this? It would take quite a lot obviously and the euro would be damaged considerably.

We are living in times when almost every government is engaging in policies that will devalue their paper currencies. Hard assets unquestionably become more valuable under such circumstances. How much the U.S. dollar, the British pound, the euro and the yen devalue in relationship to each other remains to be seen. The Japanese have the worst debt to GDP ratio of any major economy in the world and are approaching levels last seen in Zimbabwe. The UK and the US have been the biggest money printers so far, but the euro zone might catch up and surpass them. The best approach for investors would be to avoid keeping any significant amount of liquid assets in any of these currencies.

Disclosure: No positions.

NEXT: World Economic Leaders Need IQ Bailout

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.