Why You Must Invest for Inflation From Now On

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Fed made history today by announcing an open-ended money printing policy — a policy heretofore unseen outside of history's hyperinflation havens. The news conference that followed the announcement revealed a central bank acting out of extreme desperation.

While the Fed is doing another round of quantitative easing, QE3 is not the same as QE2. The previous QE involved the purchase of U.S. Treasuries. This time around, the Fed is buying MBSs (mortgage-backed securities). In QE1, various types of securities were bought. The previous QEs also had specific limits to the amount of money that was going to be printed whereas QE3 doesn't. QE3 is supposed to be ongoing until somewhat after the economy and employment situation have been improving for a while. How long that will be is anybody's guess.

Despite several questions in the press conference that followed the announcement, Bernanke made only vague statements about how the Fed would determine when enough money printing was enough. The purchase of mortgage-backed securities is likely to continue for some time because doing so is supposed to reduce unemployment. How that will work is not clear other than perhaps reducing unemployment in the construction industry. The Fed's actions should lower already historically low mortgage rates and Bernanke specifically stated more than once that getting the price of homes up was one of his major goals (he seems to have forgotten that the global financial collapse in 2008 was the result of the collapse of the housing bubble).

Anticipating the obvious objections, Bernanke tried to head off the major criticisms of the Fed's new plan at the beginning of his news conference. While he admitted that the Fed's action hurt savers and would make it difficult to prepare for retirement, he said that if you don't  have a job you wouldn't have any money to save anyway. So, apparently the large majority of people who have a job should risk having their retirement unfunded in order to pursue Bernanke's high risk policies that have been tried for the last five years, but haven't worked. I wouldn't have been surprised if a couple of retired people were brought up to the podium and Bernanke kicked them a few times to emphasize his point.

Bernanke also denied that the new round of money printing will cause inflation. The basis of his argument was that the members of the FOMC aren't prediction inflation in their projections, so obviously it's not going to happen (these are the same people that failed to foresee the subprime crisis coming). Also Bernanke claimed inflation has been around 2% for years, so there is no problem. Even a casual perusal of commodity prices since 2009 shows increases of 100%, 150%, 200% and sometimes more however. It is true the government isn't reporting inflation, but that isn't the same as it doesn't exist. The head of the Weimar German central bank also claimed inflation wasn't a problem as he printed more and more money. Eventually, inflation reached 300 million percent.

One of the real eye-openers of the Bernanke news conference was his admitting the impotency of the Fed and monetary policy. Over and over again Bernanke stated that the Fed's actions were, "not a panacea". He said that, "We [the Fed] can't solve the problems by ourselves". He also emphasized that the Fed's, "tools are not so powerful that they can solve the problem". If the chances of success are so limited, why is the Fed taking a course of action that could have serious negative consequences for the American people?

In addition to his desire to reinflate the housing bubble, Bernanke was also proud that when the Fed speaks, economic forecasters change their numbers and that, "markets respond to [the Fed's] guidance".  This was a blatant admission that the Fed purposely manipulates the stock and bond markets and financial news. Obviously, this destruction of free market mechanisms is not something that he considers shameful, even though this represents a major power grab on the part of the Fed.

Bernanke was much more coy however when the question of whether or not the Fed's money printing decision was base on political considerations. One reporter mentioned that Romney was not planning on reappointing Bernanke and asked if the policy shift was an attempt to help reelect President Obama. Bernanke denied this of course, his voice almost breaking when he stammered out, "our decisions are based entirely on the state of the economy." I must admit that I am personally surprised that the Fed did this before the election because this question is only going to be the beginning and the Fed has now made itself an ongoing issue in the presidential campaign. I didn't think Bernanke was so foolish to take this risk, but obviously I overestimated his political awareness.

Earlier this month, ECB head Mario Draghi promised unlimited bond buying. This is different from what the Fed is doing because those purchases are supposed to be sterilized (new liquidity put in is neutralized by liquidity being removed). Many people however believe that the ECB will have to engage in money printing despite its claims. Added to the Fed, this means inflation investments will have a bid under them for some time to come.  Investors should be looking at gold and silver, energy and agriculture. Ironically, shorting Treasury bonds also look like a good bet now as well, since the Fed is not buying them as part of its QE program (Operation Twist though will be going on to the end of 2012 however and this acts to lower interest rates around the 7 to 10-year maturity level so be careful). Keep buying as long as the Fed keeps printing.


Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Interest Rates Spike on News From Banks

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While the big Tuesday rally in stocks got all the media attention, the big selloff in U.S. Treasuries that accompanied it went largely unnoticed. Good news for banks apparently means much higher interest rates and bad news for consumers.

Yields on U.S. treasuries were not that far above historical lows before the boondoggle accompanying the Federal Reserve's stress test announcements. When JP Morgan jumped the gun and other banks followed on March 13th, stocks mounted a spectacular rally in the last hour of trade. No one asked however where the money to fund all of that stock buying was coming from. Even a casual analysis shows that it came from the selling of U.S. Treasuries (which continued into the next day). 

The two-day rise in yields from the bond selloff was sizeable to say the least, with the longer-end of the curve having the biggest gains in absolute terms. Yields were up 26 basis points on the 30-year, 25 basis points on the 10-year, and 26 basis points on the 7-year (a basis point is one hundredth of a percent). Even the 5-year yield rose 21 basis points. Essentially, interest rates rose a quarter of a percent on treasuries with maturities of 5 years or more — and it all happened literally overnight. 

Since interest rates were at such low levels, the spike in yields represented a big increase on a percentage basis. This was most pronounced at the middle part of the curve. Yields on the 7-year went from 1.43% to 1.69%, for a gain of 18%. Yields of the 5-year went from 0.92% to 1.13%, and this represented a 23% increase. An even bigger jump took place in the 3-year, with yields up 28%when rates rose from 0.47% to 0.60%. The two-year though was up only 18% after going from  0.33% to 0.40%. The percentage increase in the 10-year, where yields went from 2.04% to  2.29%, and the 30-year, where yields went from 3.17% to 3.43%, were modest in comparison.

Treasury bills were less affected with yields on the 3-month and 6-month unchanged. The one-year rate rose from 0.18% to 0.21%. The one-month yield (which went negative in late 2008 and late 2009) went from 0.05% to 0.08%.  Yield information for treasuries can be found at: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield.

The Fed's Operation Twist, a plan to sell $400 billion of shorter-dated Teasuries and buy an equivalent amount of longer-dated paper is still ongoing. By the end of March, a switch of $268 billion will have taken place. The purpose of this operation is to keep rates for the 10-year yield low in order to stimulate the economy. Apparently, it wasn't working so well this week. The Fed publishes the schedule for its Operation Twist sales and purchases and these can be found at: http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/tot_operation_schedule.html.

The rise in interest rates is not just important to investors, but to consumers. as well. Consumer loans are frequently based on some formula using the 10-year Treasury yield. If this goes up a quarter of a percent, so will the rates on consumer debt. This will be a drag on the economy. While rates have been kept artificially low by the central bank for the last three years (they have gone down during the "recovery", when they should have been going up), the sudden rise in yields this week indicates the Fed may be losing its ability to hold them down.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Terrible Third Quarter Will Be Followed by a Bad Fourth

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The third quarter of 2011 had the biggest drop and most volatility for stocks since 2008.  The fourth quarter may not be much better since the cause of the problem is a new credit crisis and an emerging global recession. Both will continue to be a drag on the market.

Except for small cap stocks, the U.S. markets did somewhat better than many overseas markets during the quarter. The Hang Seng in Hong Kong was down 25.7%, the CAC-40 in France fell 25.6% and the DAX in Germany dropped 25.0%. Only the Russell 2000 in the U.S. was lower by a comparable amount, falling 24.1% from its May 31st close. These indices are all in deep bear territory. Not much better was the Bovespa in Brazil. It lost 19.0% in the third quarter. The Brazilian market peaked in November 2010 and it too is in a bear market.

While the bigger cap U.S. indices weren't down as much, they were severely damaged nevertheless. The S&P 500 was lower by 15.9%, the Nasdaq by 14.8% and the Dow industrials by 13.2%. This was just the drop during the quarter. U.S. stocks in general peaked on May 2nd. From its high back then to its low in the third quarter, the S&P 500 dropped 19.6%. A bear market is defined as a loss of 20%.

Volatility returned to the markets with a vengeance in the third quarter. The VIX index reached a high of 48.00, not much below its peak in the 2000 to 2002 mega-bear, but well off its Credit Crisis peak around 90. Mini-crashes returned to the market, with both the Nasdaq and Russell 2000 experiencing drops equal to or greater than 5% on three different days.  There were four consecutive days in August when the Dow was up or down by 400 points or more. A volatile market is prone to selling and  markets usually need to calm down before they can bottom.

Just as was the case during the Credit Crisis year of 2008, only two major assets were up in the third quarter — treasuries and gold. The 10-year hit an all-time low yield of 1.71% (bond prices go up when yields fall). This was well below the previous low that took place because of the Great Depression in the 1930s. While the price of gold fell by 15% at the end of the quarter, it rallied from the beginning until its peak on September 6th. It wound up rising 5.8% (as measured by GLD) from its closing price on May 31st. Its companion precious metal, silver, had a quarterly drop of 23.1%.

There is no reason to think that the market will bottom until problems in Europe come to some stable resolution. Greece admitted over the weekend that it would not be meeting the budget targets that were part of the terms of the first bailout. Global markets are once again selling off, as if this was somehow surprising news — Greece has misrepresented its financial number repeatedly, it would only be surprising if they turned out to be accurate. Greece may still get its next tranche of bailout money, since the EU has shown over and over again that its standards for the currency union are meaningless. Eventually though Greece will default because too much bailout money will be needed to keep it afloat. Even at that point, Spain and Italy will have to be reckoned with.

The other issue facing the markets is a global economic downturn. While a case can be made that the post-Credit Crisis economy never got out of recession (the unemployment rate and consumer confidence remained at recession levels for instance), the important question is whether or not economic activity is declining now. Last week, even the ECRI (Economic Cycle Research Institute) admitted the U.S. economy was heading down. Since a credit crisis can make an economic decline much worse, this doesn't bode well for the markets in the upcoming months.
Disclosure: None 

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

10 Reasons We Are in a Credit Crisis

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Yesterday's news was about a potential Greek default and it caused a global market selloff. Today,  hopes of preventing a Greek default are causing markets to rally. This alternating news flow is repeating over and over again. Investors should pay attention to the big picture however and not the noise of the day. The important thing to realize is that we are in a second global credit crisis.

Credit crises follow certain patterns, which include: recognition of overpriced financial assets, money flowing into safe havens, increased market volatility, rising costs for financial insurance, and various forms of government action to stop the problem. The specifics of the current credit crisis are below.

1. Government debt is being downgraded. This happened in Italy yesterday, the U.S. in early August and many times in Greece. This is the upfront recognition of the problem, which is almost always widespread public knowledge by the time it happens. In 2008, securitized debt containing subprime real estate loans was downgraded in mass, frequently from the triple A ratings that had previously been given.

2. Global money is flowing into safe haven U.S. treasuries. When yields hit lower levels than a previous credit crisis or all-time lows, this indicates this is happening on a mass scale. U.S. government two-year notes had a yield below 0.15% at one point this September 19th. During 2008, the two-year held above 0.60%. The ten-year yield has fallen below the 2.04% low in 2008 and below the all-time low of 1.95% in 1941.

3. Global money is flowing into safe haven currencies. In 2008, this was the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. In 2010, this is the Japanese yen, the Swiss franc, and gold (which needs to be thought of as a currency if it is to be analyzed correctly). The Swiss franc rallied so much that the Swiss stopped it from trading freely. The Japanese have also taken action to try to lower the value of the yen.

4. Stock market volatility has increased enormously. In 2008, there were a significant number of mini-crashes (a drop of 5% or more in one day). These were more common in the U.S. back then. Now they are more common in Germany, but they have been happening here as well. The flip side of mini-crashes is sudden sharp moves up in the market. These are also occurring.

5. Bank stocks are the focus of the big moves up and down in the stock market. U.S. banks and other financial stocks really got hit in 2008 -- a number of the companies themselves went under. This time it's European banks falling the hardest. One-day drops for some major EU and UK banks have been as high as 10%. Bank stocks aren't dropping that much in the U.S., but they are underperforming other sectors like technology.

6. Credit default swaps have hit record levels. Credit default swaps (CDSs) are bond insurance and they became a big news item in 2008 when they rose to unprecedented levels. While CDS rates for Greek sovereign debt have hit records and are rising for the other highly indebted EU countries, they have also hit records for some UK and EU banks in 2011 indicating a worse crisis than in 2008.

7. Major and ongoing bailouts are taking place. The EU had to bail out Greece in the spring of 2010 and then Ireland and Portugal. A second bailout for Greece had to be arranged this July, even though the first bailout was supposed to have taken care of Greece's debt problem. In 2008, the U.S. had TARP and arranged for failing banks to be taken over by stronger banks  (Bank America is now in trouble again because of the legacy loans from the banks it absorbed during this period). Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had to be nationalized. 

8. Central banks are buying bonds in the open market. The EU has been buying up Italian, Spanish, Irish and Portuguese bonds in order to hold down interest rates in those countries. As long as it has an infinite access to funds, this strategy will work. The Fed began buying U.S. debt instruments in the fall of 2008 during the Credit Crisis. 

9. Global coordinated central bank intervention took place last week. The need for global action is a consequence of the interconnectedness of the world financial system. A major problem in one region (in 2011 this is Europe, in 2008 it was the U.S.) will invariably spread everywhere. Central banks coordinate their activity to try to control the contagion. 

10. The global economy is turning down.  Problems in the financial system impact the real economy and they can turn a shallow downturn into a major one as has happened in 2008. Economic figures throughout the world have flattened and there are some warnings of a bigger drop to come (extremely low consumer confidence numbers for instance). GDP contraction in a number of regions will be the final confirmation that another global credit crisis has occurred. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

EU-Centered Credit Crisis Continues

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The 2011 Credit Crisis continued Tuesday with the Stoxx Europe 6000 index hitting a two-year low, the Swiss taking desperate measures to control the franc, more record high prices for credit default swaps (bond insurance) on British Banks and yields on 10-year U.S. treasuries hitting an all-time low. Despite the dramatic turn of events, stock losses were somewhat muted.

U.S. markets opened sharply lower, but the Nasdaq and S&P 500 recovered toward the close in a technical move that involved filling the gap down that took place on the open. The Dow however still had a 101 point loss at the close. In Europe, the German DAX was down 1.0% and the CAC-40 in Paris 1.13%. While these losses would have been considered significant only a few months ago, they are minor compared to what has taken place on a number of trading days since late July. The British FTSE up even up 1.06%, despite trouble in the UK banking sector.

The British banks most in trouble are the ones that were nationalized during the 2008 Credit Crisis -- Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyd's Banking Group. Credit default swap (CDS) rates for these banks are higher than they have ever been. CDS rates for HSBC and Standard Chartered are at one-year highs. The problem with these banks seems to be toxic loans left over from earlier in the 2000s. It is not clear if they were included in a sweeping statement made Monday by Josef Ackermann, CEO of Deutsche Bank, that "numerous" European banks would collapse if they were forced to recognize all losses against their holdings of government debt.   

The most significant market event yesterday was the Swiss capping the value of the franc. The Swiss National Bank (SNB) said it would "no longer tolerate" a euro franc exchange rate below 1.20. The franc then had a significant drop against all major currencies. A similar approach was tried in 1978 and it did succeed in stabilizing the franc back then. Such currency intervention measures generally only work for a short time however. It remains to be seen how long it will take before the franc begins rising again.

The new Credit Crisis is also showing up in U.S. treasury rates just as the one in 2008 did.  The 10-year yield made another all-time low at 1.97%, taking out the 2008 low. Global money flows into U.S. government bonds during periods of financial system instability because they are still seen as safe havens. While the 10-year is only a little below its low in 2008, the two-year at 0.20% on Tuesday is well below its low point back then.

Credit Crises are not very short events. The previous one lasted six months. This one could last that long or even longer. The cause of the problem has to be gotten under control. In this case, it is the ongoing debt crisis in Greece and the emerging ones in Italy and Spain. While a default in Greece could happen this fall and create some finality there, the problems in Italy and Spain are only in their early stages. So, this could go on for some time.

Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Should Stocks be Rallying on Hopes of QE3?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.  


Stocks have rallied significantly since August 10th on the hopes that the Federal Reserve will engage in a third round of quantitative easing (QE) -- a form of money printing. While QE1 and QE2 were successful in juicing stock prices, this is not what the Fed is supposed to be doing.

The Fed's current mandate was established by the U.S. Congress in 1977 in the Federal Reserve Reform Act. This legislation requires the Fed to establish a monetary policy that "promotes maximum employment, stable prices and moderate long-term interest rates". Manipulating stock prices is not supposed to be on the Fed's agenda. Quantitative Easing was unknown in 1977 and was therefore not specifically addressed by Congress.

If anything,the Fed has significantly overshot in its goal to keep long-term rates moderate. The Fed Funds rate has been kept at around zero percent since December 2008. The Fed has stated it will maintain this rate until 2013. The interest rate on the 10-year treasury fell below 2.00% at one point this August -- a record low. Two-year rates fell below 0.20%, also record lows and well below the bottom rate during the Credit Crisis. Low interest rates indicate an economy in recession and not deflation as is commonly claimed in the mainstream press. Maintaining interest rates at a low level for too long is inflationary however.

The Fed announced its first quantitative easing program in November 2008 (according to an analysis of its balance sheet, it was begun somewhat earlier). The second round ended this June. How has the employment situation changed during the two rounds of QE?  When QE1 started in November 2008, the official U.S. unemployment rate was 6.8%. When it ended in June 2011, it was 9.2%. The high was 10.1% in October 2009. The post-World War II average has been 5.7% and unemployment has fallen to the 3% range when the economy is strong. With respect to employment, quantitative easing seems to have been a failure.

So what about price stability, the Fed's other mandate? While the inflationary effects of quantitative easing are most evident in commodity prices, the typical American consumer has seen them in gasoline, food and clothing prices. The average price of gasoline was as low as $1.60 a gallon when the Fed started QE1 and it almost reached $4.00 a gallon during QE2. A number of commodities, including cotton and copper, hit all-time record-high prices during QE2. Gold, the ultimate measure of inflation,rose to one new price high after another. Silver went from under $10 an ounce to over $48 an ounce. Quantitative easing obviously hasn't led to price stability. In fact, it has resulted in much higher prices and is therefore counterproductive to the Fed's goal of limiting inflation.

There is no question that quantitative easing has helped the stock market and resulted in higher stock prices. This is not exactly a secret however and all Wall Street traders are well aware of it. They will therefore push stock prices higher if they think more quantitative easing is on the way and much of any rally that results will occur before it even takes place. Quantitative easing is also no panacea for stock prices. It doesn't insulate the market from external shocks. While it doesn't make crashes more likely, it will make them worse when they occur. A default on Greek, Spanish or Italian debt and any number of other crises will have greater impact than they would have ordinarily because the market has been pumped up to artificially high levels. The market has also become dependent on quantitative easing and has not been able to rally since late 2008 without it. Almost as soon as it stops, the market drops and those drops will become more serious after each succeeding round.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Quantitative Easing Means Foreigners Will Dump Treasuries

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stocks and gold rallied strongly yesterday on the news that Japan is doing more quantitative easing and remarks from Fed Chair Ben Bernanke that more quantitative easing (also known as money printing) would be good for the U.S. economy. The major, and possibly disastrous, downside risks were not mentioned in mainstream media reports.

Quantitative easing has been tried many times before in Japan. It has failed to produce any lasting results, which is why it needs to be done again. The Fed has already engaged in quantitative easing during the Credit Crisis (frequently referred to as QE1) and is also doing it again because it didn't have any lasting results. Moreover, it isn't clear that any positive results took place at all because of QE1. The Fed claims it was a great success, but hasn't offered any proof to support its contention. There is certainly proof that it didn't work. Exhibit one is the much higher unemployment rate that we currently have. Just the need to do quantitative easing again is in and of itself proof that this was a failed policy.

While the advantages of quantitative easing are dubious, the risks can be horrendous. The biggest danger is for a country with a massive debt held outside that country (this describes the United States, but not Japan) Printing money is inflationary. It devalues the currency of the country doing it. The trade-weighted dollar did indeed have a big sell off on the news. Inflation-sensitive gold hit another all-time high. Quantitative easing will encourage large foreign holders to sell U.S. debt and to not make purchases in the future, except for TIPS (treasury inflation protected securities). Even TIPS will ultimately be shunned because they reflect the understated official U.S. government inflation rate. Without this source of foreign capital, the U.S. cannot fund its budget deficit or its trade deficit. This would send the economy into a severe contraction. The only way to avoid that would be to print even more money...and then more money ....and then more money. Without the money printing, the U.S. economy would enter a severe depression. With money printing, the risk is hyperinflation.

The biggest foreign holders of U.S. treasuries are China, Japan, the UK, the Oil Exporters, Brazil, the Caribbean Banking Centers (off-shore money havens used to hide the parties involved in financial transactions), Hong Kong, Russia, Taiwan, Switzerland and Canada. Why would these countries continue holding U.S. government bonds if they know they are going to be paid back in devalued currency? Why will these countries want to buy more bonds in the future? According to TIC (Treasury International Capital) data, China held $939.9 billion in U.S. treasuries in July 2009. In July 2010, it held only $846.7 billion. It is also known that China has been selling long-dated paper and moving into the short end of the yield curve. Other countries would want to do the same in response to quantitative easing. This may be why yields on the two-year note keep hitting all-time lows.

The impact of the first round of U.S. quantitative easing shows up even more clearly in the amount of treasuries held by the Fed. At the end of the first quarter, the Fed held $5.259 trillion in U.S. government bonds - more than five times the amount of China, the largest foreign holder. The nightmare scenario of the U.S. having to print money to buy its own government bonds because it can no longer borrow enough money from foreign sources to fund its government operations has clearly already taken place. That the Fed is now doing more quantitative easing indicates a self reinforcing inflationary cycle is underway. Investors should act accordingly.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why Quantitative Easing Will Raise Long-Term Rates

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The two-year treasury yield fell to another record low on Monday, touching 0.3987%. The 10-year treasury yield was up slightly however in September, rising for the first time since March. Federal Reserve money-printing is behind both falling shorter-term rates and rising longer-term rates.

A survey by Bloomberg of more than 60 mainstream economists indicates they expect 10-year treasury yields to keep rising in 2010 and through 2011. Perhaps someone has been passing around some notes on the approximately 500 hundred year old 'quantity theory of money', which states if the amount of currency is increased without an appropriate increase in economic growth, inflation will result (and consequently interest rates will have to rise, with the biggest increase taking place on long-term bonds).  For this not to happen, the laws of simple arithmetic have to be violated. The Federal Reserve has essentially been maintaining that that is what has taken place for the last two years. Bernanke of course does not directly state that we have entered a new economic age where two plus two no longer equals four because he would be laughed out of Washington and even the never questioning U.S. mainstream media wouldn't print such garbage.

Bloomberg also reports that a survey of primary dealers (the people who buy the paper that the Treasury issues) estimates that the Fed will buy $100 billion to $1 trillion in Treasuries by the end of the year. According to Deutsche Bank however, the market has reacted as if $315 billion to $670 billion of quantitative easing has taken place recently. The Fed announced on August 10th that it would be conducting further quantitative easing this year. The stock market then had its best September in seven decades. Money printing is an easy way to juice up stock prices. And since there is an important election on November 2nd, it would make sense to think all or almost all of what is scheduled for 2010 will take place before people vote. It looks like that is exactly what is happening.

While the Fed's actions can make the stock market look good in the short-term (investors need to watch out for what follows however) and can make shorter-term rates like the two-year go down because of all of the buying that it is doing,  longer-term rates will go up if the market sees this as inflationary. The 10-year treasury is the bench mark for everything from home mortgages, to credit cards, to corporate bonds. Higher yields on the 10-year are a drag on the economy. The Fed has supposedly reinstituted quantitative easing to stimulate the economy, although there is little evidence that the Fed has managed to stimulate the economy very much in the last three years. The stimulus has instead come from massive government budget deficits. The Fed seems oblivious to the existence of a liquidity trap, a condition where increased 'money' generated from the central bank just moves around the financial system and never gets into the real economy. Under such circumstances, doing more of the same won't make things any better, but can easily make them worse.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Fed's Minimum Price Stability, Maximum Unemployment Policy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Fed says it's worried about deflation and high unemployment. So in order to tackle these two problems it's going to do more of the same things that lead to them.

In its post meeting statement yesterday, the FOMC said that inflation is 'somewhat below' levels consistent with its congressional mandate for stable prices.  Since the official inflation rate is positive, this indicates that under no circumstance should prices actually remain stable in the U.S. It also means that prices have to increase by more than the amount they are rising now. This of course leads to long-term dollar devaluation and indeed the dollar has lost 96% of its value since the Fed has been in business. They obviously can't wait to lop off the remaining 4%. Having a worthless currency is obviously a good thing as far as the Fed is concerned (you might disagree when you have to pay $5,000 for a loaf of bread). Inflation-sensitive gold hit its fifth record high in as many days on the news and was pushing $1300 an ounce this morning.

It order to tackle the non-existent deflation problem, the Fed intimated that more quantitative easing - also known as money printing - is on the way. There is no case in financial history when excess money printing hasn't eventually led to higher consumer inflation and it has frequently led to hyperinflation. The Fed has already done a lot of 'printing' and the ever increasing price of gold is showing the dollar losing value right in front of our eyes. However, the see no inflation, hear no inflation, and speak no inflation Fed ignores the gold market. Instead they are looking at ever dropping interest rates - the two-year treasury hit another record low after the meeting. Falling interest rates are being caused by all the new money they are manufacturing because bonds are being bought with some of it and this drives their price up and rates down. Using some form of inverted, twisted thinking, they view a market reaction caused by excess money printing as a sign of deflation.

The Fed first lowered its Funds rate to zero in 2008. With help from the U.S. treasury, they have engaged in an expansionary money creating policy since then as well. Unemployment is now much higher than when they started these moves and is stuck around the 10% range if you believe the official numbers (if not, it's much higher). After the worst recession since the 1930s, the economy is stuck in neutral, if you believe the official numbers (if not, we have already entered another recession). So the Fed's solution is to ratchet up the same policies that have failed over and over again and they claim somehow they will work now. It is far more likely the Fed's actions will nstead lead to minimum price stability and maximum unemployment.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Is the Bond Market Setting Up for Another Credit Crisis?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Spreads on high yield bonds and U.S. treasuries are narrowing. Junk bond issuance is at an all-time high because excess liquidity is lowering risk aversion. Who is buying all the bonds is not particularly clear however. But don't worry, just as they did before the last Credit Crisis, the economic elite is telling us there is nothing to worry about this time either.

When there is too much money sloshing around the global financial system, the distortion shows up clearly in the bond market because it's an insider's game. The average investor isn't exactly trading credit default swaps in his or her 401K. According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, less than $29 billion has gone into high yield bond funds in the last 20 months. Yet Dealogic data indicates that $172 billion of junk bonds have been issued in just 2010 alone. Spreads over 10-year treasuries are now around 6%, but have been somewhat lower during the summer. In 2007, spreads fell to around 2% and this indicated all common sense had abandoned the bond market. The inevitable collapse followed and at the height of the Credit Crisis, junk/treasury spreads were over 20%.

One of the major determinants of yields on junk bonds is the danger of default. The economy is in much worse shape now than it was in 2007, even though we were just told yesterday by the NBER that the recession ended 15 months ago (boy, that sure is a timely announcement). So we should not get as low as a 2% spread between junk and U.S. treasuries like we did last time. Less risk of failure because of government bailouts should not be assumed either. Few issuers of junk bonds would be considered too-big-to-fail and the government blank check for bailouts is either over or it soon will be.

There is also the mystery of why as more and more bonds are being issued, less and less trading activity is taking place. Bloomberg economist Michael McDonough recently reported U.S. treasury trading is down and so is junk bond trading. Trading in stocks on the NYSE is also down as the market has risen. So how can prices be going up when there is a greater supply of bonds, but apparently less demand?  This is not really possible, so there has to be missing information. Now who would have access to vast sums of money and the ability to hide their activities in the market?

A narrow spread between junk and treasuries is something to keep an eye on and to worry about. It is a good indicator of whether or not central banks have injected so much liquidity into the financial system that they have risked another credit crisis. It is not possible to say where the exact point is where the spread is too low, although it is now definitely somewhere well above 2%. If we haven't reached it yet, we are getting close.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Liquidity Trap: The Global Collapse of Government Bond Yields

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Government bond yields are dropping throughout the world. The U.S. 2-year, the German 5-year, 10-year and 30-year, and the French 10-year have all hit record lows recently. The Japanese 10-year is back below 1.0% and has fallen as low as 0.90%. The UK 10-year yield has been dropping for months and is only 17 basis points above its Credit Crisis low.

Record or close to record low yields on government bonds indicates enormous buying demand. Bonds hitting record low yields are by definition hitting record high prices. Moreover bond prices are going up when supply has undergone a tremendous expansion to pay for all the economic stimulus programs governments are running. So demand for government bonds has to be increasing faster than the rapidly growing supply if yields are falling. The obvious question is: Who is buying all of these bonds?

If yields were dropping in just one country instead of in almost everywhere, increased demand might be partially explained by countries with big foreign reserves like China buying more government debt. China has been a major purchaser of U.S. treasuries for a long time, but last month it sold about 3% of its holdings. Yet yields on long-term treasuries continued to drop, when they should have gone up. In the U.S., there has been enough buying to not only make up for the loss from China, but to purchase an even larger amount of bonds. There is only one possible source for funding for this demand for government paper in the U.S. and elsewhere on the planet and that is the national central banks and treasury departments.

Essentially, the central banks are 'printing' huge amounts of new money. This money goes into the financial system and gets recycled into purchasing government bonds and also stuck in the banking system as reserves. Most of the newly created money does not go into the real economy. It does allow governments to spend much more money than they could have ordinarily however, but most of this 'stimulus' actually goes for maintaining the status quo (with the objective of preventing further collapse) rather than for anything that would create growth in the future. So the economy stagnates, but holds up as long as the money printing ruse can be maintained. This is a liquidity trap and much of the global economy has already fallen into it based on the interest rate behavior of government bonds.

A liquidity trap is an ugly situation to say the least.  Either a country continues to spend its wealth to support its lifestyle until all of it is dissipated and complete impoverishment occurs or it finds a way to get some of the liquidity into the real economy. The problem is that only small measured amounts of liquidity can be allowed to flow into the economy in any given time period, but this is not the likely scenario. If the central bankers were capable of making this happen, they would have already done it. More likely is that the floodgates will be open and too much liquidity goes into the real economy too quickly. Hyperinflation will then occur and prices could start to skyrocket almost overnight. Japan has faced this situation for the last twenty years, now it looks like all the developed economies are going to be facing it.


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Fed Admits 3 Years of Easy Money Hasn't Fixed Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


After three years of easy money the Federal Reserve announced yesterday that it was going to buy around $10 billion a month in treasury bonds - a pittance for an economy the size of the United States. The Fed began its current stimulus campaign with a discount rate cut in August 2007. After using every trick in the book and creating a few new ones, the U.S. economy is still in a troubled state.

In its statement after yesterday's meeting, the Fed admitted that "the pace of recovery in output and employment has slowed in recent months" and "bank lending has continued to contract." The FOMC went on to say that "the the pace of economic recovery is likely to be more modest in the near term than had been anticipated."   Considering that the Fed was hopeful of preventing a recession in the spring of 2008- months after a recession had already started, these statements imply that the U.S. economy is currently close to or even in a downturn.

The Fed doesn't plan on doing much about it however. It can't lower the funds rate any further because it is has been at zero since December 2008. The major option the Fed has left to stimulate the economy is to expand its balance sheet through quantitative easing, essentially money printing. This would be inflationary as is the case with all forms of money printing. While the Fed constantly says there is no inflation and intimates that it is worried about deflation, it is unwilling to make a move that would be inflationary. If deflation is really a risk, expanding its balance sheet becomes the correct course of action. Investors should wonder why the Fed is unwilling to do this.

What the Fed plans on doing currently is to buy 2-year and 10-year treasuries with the proceeds it gets from selling mortgage backed securities that it acquired from Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) during the Credit Crisis. The Fed has more than a trillion dollars of these on its books. This action will prevent the Fed's balance sheet from contracting. The net purchase in treasuries will be minimal. The overall impact on the U.S. economy will be close to nil.

Investors should look to Japan for a lesson on how inept central bank and fiscal policy can lead to decades of a failed economy and low stock prices. The Nikkei closed at 9213 last night, more than 75% off from its high around 40,000 on the last day of 1989. The Japanese economy has been in the doldrums for two decades now. In the United States, it's three years and counting.


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A New Theory of Sudden Hyperinflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


While everyone acknowledges that governments are printing and printing excess amounts of new money, more market observers are currently worried about deflation rather than inflation. There is a smaller group concerned about hyperinflation, but the theoretical underpinnings have been missing up to now that would justify how this could be possible. There is an explanation though and this indicates that hyperinflation can not only take place, but that is can happen suddenly.

There have been a number of impediments in how economists look at hyperinflation that have prevented original thought (and sometimes any thought at all) in this area.  Here are the necessary ideas:

1. Inflation is a currency losing its value (an idea most mainstream economist can't seem to grasp).
2. Severe deflation is a precursor to hyperinflation. They are not inconsistent events as is generally thought, but deflation sets the stage for hyperinflation.
3. Disinflation/deflation and inflation need not by symmetrical. For instance, if there is 30 years of disinflation, this doesn't have to be balanced by 30 years of inflation. The same amount of inflation could take place in only months or even weeks, let alone 30 years.
4. Inflation doesn't have to be a continuous phenomenon. The chart can have gaps in it with prices going up significantly overnight. Furthermore this can start from a low point where almost no inflation exists.

The origins of hyperinflation are with excess 'money' printing by a government. It is not possible to produce an ever-larger amount of currency and have each unit of that currency maintain its value. If it were, real money could be created out of thin air and everyone in the world could become infinitely rich overnight. This would also violate the basic laws of arithmetic. So excess money printing always devalues a currency and because of this less and less can bought with each unit of that currency.

This becomes a potentially dangerous problem when severe deflation takes place because of a shock to the financial system (the Credit Crisis for instance). To make up for the loss in value of assets (deflation), the government prints a huge amount of money. The printing causes devaluation of the currency and requires more printing to try to make up for the additional loss of value. A self-feeding money printing cycle then develops.

Even though huge money creation has occurred because of the Credit Crisis, we still haven't seen significant inflation yet. Indeed, the American government claims the U.S. inflation rate has fallen close to zero. How is this possible? The answer can be found in the banking system. The feds have pumped huge amounts of money into it (U.S. bank reserves have increased approximately 100 times or 10,000% since the Credit Crisis began) and banks have received this money at close to a zero percent interest rate.  Yet, if you look at commercial and consumer bank lending, you will see that they have been declining. So where did all this money go?  It was used to buy treasuries and this is what is allowing the federal government to fund its massive deficits. For all intensive purposes, this is a massive Ponzi scheme being run by the U.S. government.

Ponzi schemes though don't follow the same rules as normal businesses or economic statistics. They build to a crescendo over time and then suddenly collapse to zero instantly. The analogy for inflation will be the opposite however. Inflation will go to zero and then suddenly jump up to some very high level. In theory, zero interest rates should produce infinite inflation (hyperinflation), but nothing mandates that this has to be a gradual, long-term process. If you think about it, the Credit Crisis seems to have come out of nowhere. It didn't of course; there was a slow, long-term build up behind the scenes that just exploded suddenly. Inflation is likely to follow that same path of development. Global governments eventually got control of the Credit Crisis collapse by throwing trillions of dollars at the problem. That solution however won't work for dealing with inflation.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Markets Trading Like They Did During Credit Crisis

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stocks are selling off globally. Commodities are down, but gold is holding up the best. Money is pouring into the perceived safe havens, the U.S. dollar and treasuries. Is it the late fall of 2008 or late spring of 2010?

Without further information, you can't answer that question. There is a global financial crisis occurring now because of the problems with the euro. There was a global financial crisis in 2008 because of the collapse of the prices of derivatives related to subprime mortgages. The problems with subprime debt had begun the year before and started impacting stocks in July 2007. Stocks were already in an advanced bear market sell off by the fall of 2008. The current euro crisis is only a few months old and U.S. stocks are only in a correction so far (loss of over 10% versus loss of over 20% for a bear market).

The current stock market sell off is worldwide as it was in 2008. It goes without saying the stocks in the eurozone are suffering, but technical damage can be found in major markets everywhere. The Dow Jones has broken key support at 10,000 twice already. The Nikkei gave up its significant 10,000 level a while ago, closing at 9521 last night. The Hang Seng has fallen below important support at 20,000, dropping to 19,378. In the UK, the FTSE is barely holding above 5,000 today.

The trade-weighted dollar (DXY) was as high as 88.71 in New York this morning (June 7th). This is higher than its peak in November 2008, but not as high as the top in March 2009. There was a major sell off in the middle, with the euro (FXE) having a sharp rally. Something similar is likely to happen early this summer. The dollar is very overbought and the euro is very oversold. The euro has traded as low as 1.1878 today. It may pop back up to the 120 support level and if not, there is stronger support around 115. The dollar is already hitting major resistance, so the set up for a short-term reversal looks like it is taking place.

As would be expected, U.S. treasuries have rallied strongly during the euro crisis. It is highly unlikely that they will get to the extremely low levels they did in 2008. As treasuries rally, interest rates go down of course. Interest rates on the 10-year fell to around 2.00% in December 2008. They were at 3.18% this morning. There is strong chart support at and just above the 3.00% level. So not much more of a treasury rally, interest rate sell off should be expected for now.

Currently gold has recaptured its safe haven status. It was selling off with the euro between last December and this February. Then it started rallying with the U.S. dollar, although it usually trades opposite to the dollar. Gold sold down in the fall of 2008. Central bank leasing was responsible for this. The big banks and large hedge funds leased gold at a small price and then sold it on the market to raise desperately needed cash. This is not happening at the moment to a significant enough degree that it can offset buying elsewhere. Ironically, a sharp relief rally in the euro could be short-term bearish for gold. Despite the selling in the fall of 2008, gold still closed the year up along with the U.S. dollar and U.S. treasuries. Almost every other asset closed down. It's still too early to tell if 2010 will end the same way.   

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Inflation Denial Won't Keep Prices Low

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Denial is one of the most destructive forms of behavior for investors. While the markets can operate on false scenarios for a significant period of time, reality always wins in the end. When it does, the situation can get quite ugly and all the profits gained from a belief in an unsupportable viewpoint can evaporate over night. At the moment, there is a lot of denial about inflation and investors should be paying attention to this.

The case for inflation is based on common sense and the laws of simple arithmetic. A country cannot create money at a faster rate than its economy is growing. If this occurs, the currency is devalued and it then takes more units of currency to purchase any given item (which is the same as saying prices go up).  There is a time lag between these two events however, sometimes many years, so people frequently don't connect them. Indeed, governments who engage in this behavior frequently go to great lengths to insure the public doesn't make the connection and realize that inflation is caused by government actions. Invariably throughout history, speculators and foreigners are blamed for rising prices. Think about whether or not you've heard any talk about speculators lately. There will be a lot more of that in the future.

When it comes to inflation, governments not only try to act like magicians and dazzle you with one hand while picking your pocket with the other, but they also engage in strong and persistent denial of its existence. Any number of fanciful, but easily debunked, arguments will be produced to show inflation doesn't and even can't exist. In Weimar Germany in the early 1920s, the economic establishment engaged in an across the board denial that inflation existed and there were even 'proofs' created to show that there was really deflation. Inflation eventually reached the hundred trillion percent level there.

So what is happening in the U.S. today? At the March 16th FOMC meeting, the Fed stated "With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to be subdued for some time.” The implication is of course inflation can't exist if there is substantial resource slack. By the rules of logic, if we can find a single example that contradicts this, we cannot rely on this statement. There are of course many, many such examples. The most recent and perhaps extreme is what just took place in Zimbabwe. The unemployment rate there reached 94% (yes that's unemployment) and the economy essentially experienced a total collapse. According to U.S. Fed, there should have been massive deflation in Zimbabwe, instead of the second worse case of hyperinflation in world history. How could this have happened? Zimbabwe printed a lot of money. The U.S. has also been engaged in significant excess money printing during the last two years.

The evidence of inflation is also not likely to show up first in U.S. government reports. The government has a vested interest in making sure that it doesn't. This is part of managing inflation expectations, which the Fed also mentioned in its statement. The last thing the government wants is for people to be aware of coming inflation and they will manipulate the official numbers and the news as much as necessary to keep this from happening. Investors who want to know what is really going on with inflation need to look elsewhere for the facts. The most recent ISM (Institute of Supply Management) reports indicated very strong inflation pressures in the system, particularly in the manufacturing sector. This story got buried in the media though and was covered up with glowing claims for economic recovery.

Investors should also watch the markets for what they are saying about inflation. There are three important indicators - interest rates, oil and gold. U.S. treasury interest rates have been bubbling up for awhile now. The market is having trouble absorbing the huge supply of bonds that the U.S. has to sell in order to fund the budget deficit. Long-term interest rates have broken a 30-year downtrend line and look like they will be heading higher for many years to come. Oil just broke above a nine-month trading range and is now heading higher as well. Nothing has more of an impact in leading to higher consumer inflation than does rising oil prices (which are set internationally and are out of the Fed's control). Gold has risen from a low just above $250 in 2001 to its recent high in December above 1200. It is in a seasonally weak period at the moment, but should be hitting new all-time highs in the fall.

Inflation provides an object lesson of how investors need to approach the markets. The media is filled with information on financial topics, and much of that information is misinformation. It is necessary to cut out or ignore the irrelevant to make good investing decisions. The best way to do this is think for yourself, believe your own experience, and watch what the markets are actually doing.

Disclosure: Long oil.

NEXT: An Analysis of Retail Sales Media Coverage

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Says U.S. Treasuries Riskier than Corporate Debt

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


On March 24th, swap spreads on 7-year and 10-year treasuries and their equivalent corporate bonds turned negative for the first time ever. With this move, the market signaled that it thinks that U.S. corporate debt is less risky than U.S. government debt. If so, they will have to rewrite the finance textbooks.

A great deal of financial analysis is based on the risk free rate of return. Risk free in this instance means that default is not possible. This rate is the interest rate on government debt. Technically, sovereign governments cannot default on their bonds because they can simply print the money to pay them off if necessary.  This of course devalues the currency, creates inflation and thereby raises interest rates, which are other forms of risk. Corporations should always have higher interest rates than the country they operate in as long as the country is a sovereign nation and not part of a currency union such as the euro. This is the case because unlike government, corporations can't print money so they can go out of business and their bonds can default. The higher interest rates on corporate debt are needed to compensate for possible bankruptcy. The opposite situation makes no sense whatsoever and indicates that some very odd things are going on in the markets. Nevertheless, more than one market observer noted wryly that the fiscal soundness of many U.S. corporations is actually much better than that of the U.S. government.

The U.S. had a series of government bond auctions last week and they did not go well. Purchases by both indirect bidders, which includes central banks, and direct bidders, which includes domestic money managers, were both down. In the case of the 7-year for instance, indirect bidders bought 42% instead of the usual 50%. Direct bidders bought 8% as opposed to their average 11% purchase. When fewer bonds are bought at auction, primary dealers get stuck with the unsold inventory and then they usually dump it on the market. Bonds then sell off and interest rates go up. The yield on the 10-year rose 15 basis points last Wednesday and peaked at 3.94% on the week, almost as high as last June. Interest rates on treasuries of other maturities rose across the board.

Investors should pay particular attention to the lower demand from central banks and wonder if a lack of purchasing by China is behind this. There is an ongoing struggle between the U.S and China on whether or not China is keeping the yuan dollar exchange rate artificially low. There will be a ruling by the Treasury Department on April 15th on whether or not China is a currency manipulator. Needless to say, the Chinese are not particularly happy about this. China was a net seller of U.S. government bonds in December and January. A significant drop in their buying would cause U.S. interest rates to go up considerably.

Investors should keep an eye on treasury interest rates. The 10-year and 30-year rates have been on the decline since 1980. They now look like they are reversing this pattern and are poised to begin a multi-decade rise in interest rates (and lower bond prices). Shorting treasuries is the way to take advantage of this sea change. Two ETFs, TBT and TMV offer leveraged plays on long-term treasuries (twenty to thirty years) for those who think interest rates are going to rise.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Questionable Oil Statistics More Accurate than Other Government Numbers

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Dollar, Euro, Gold, Oil, and Treasuries

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Problems in Greece are still impacting the market with the seemingly never-ending on-again off-again possible bailout. Some resolution, even if temporary, is of course inevitable. Problems in the euro zone have set the tone for U.S. dollar and euro trading for almost four months now. These have in turn affected U.S. long-term treasuries, gold and oil. Long-term treasuries and oil have been trading in a sideways pattern since around May 2009. Gold sold down and has been in a sideways trading pattern since December. The U.S. dollar has temporarily broken a long-term downtrend and the euro a long-term uptrend because of the Greek crisis.

The U.S. trade-weighted dollar(DXY)traded down to its 50-day moving average recently and then bounced sharply off of it. The 50-day is above the 200-day, having made a bullish cross in mid-February. It seems that the trend indicators are trying to reconfirm the uptrend. On the flip side, the euro's(FXE)technical picture is the mirror image of the dollar. The 50-day moving average made a bearish cross of the 200-day in mid February. The price rose toward the 50-day recently - an expected move since the 50-day tends to act as a magnet on the downside as well as on the upside. The euro though didn't even reach the 50-day before a sharp drop. Trend indicators look like they are moving to reconfirm the downtrend

Gold (GLD, IAU, SGOL) is apparently trendless at the moment and trading around its 50-day moving average, which is above the 200-day moving average in a bullish configuration. The price pattern seems to be forming a triangle on the charts. A break out could take place either on the upside or downside. Seasonals for gold tend to be weak in late spring and early summer. As seasonals weaken for gold however, they strengthen for oil . Oil (DBO, USL, USO, OIL) is also trading in a sideways pattern and looking for a breakout. The bullish 50-day cross took place between late June and late July 2009 depending on which proxy is being considered. Oil has been stuck in a trading range since last May and needs to break out of that range, the top of which is around $83 a barrel for light sweet crude.

The 30-year Treasury interest rate ($TYX or ^TYX) has been in bullish pattern since May 2009 with the 50-day trading above the 200-day. It has gone nowhere fast during that time period, trading in a sideways pattern on the chart. Technically, it has extremely strong resistance from a 30-year downtrend line in interest rates. A rally in interest rates on the long-term treasuries (and sell off in the bond price) doesn't look imminent at the moment based on the technical picture. When it does, bullish trades on long-term treasury interest rates can be made through TBT and TMV.

Sideways trading (also known as basing) shouldn't surprise investors. It is the norm and not the exception. Most of the time markets are trendless and you need to be a short-term trader and willing to enter and exit your positions quickly to make money under those circumstances. Trends (either up or down) are where the real money is made. You can't make them happen however, you just have to watch and wait until they come along.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: U.S. Stock Market in the First Quarter of 2010

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.