The EU Has Fallen Into a Liquidity Trap and It Can't Get Up

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While the EU is still reeling from S&P's downgrade of the sovereign debt of nine of its members on January 13th and the latest talks to keep Greece afloat have hit a wall, there is an even bigger problem with the effectiveness of its stimulus programs -- the money is just not finding its way into the economy.

Global markets were jubilant in December when the ECB (European Central Bank) pumped 490 billion euros of three-year loans into the EU banking system. These funds were used by eurozone banks to buy high-risk government debt from the struggling peripheral countries. This indeed caused a temporary decline in interest rates, especially for Spain and Italy. Money from this program and other EU stimulus measures is stuck in the banking system however and it is doing little to keep the EU from sinking into a deep recession. As of Monday January 16th, the ECB had 493 billion euros on overnight deposit -- more than the entire December stimulus package.

Large amounts of funds on deposit at any central bank are an indication of a crisis in the banking system. Before the current EU debt crisis, eurozone banks usually kept only around 100 million euros on deposit at the ECB. Even during the height of the 2008 Credit Crisis, EU banks kept only around 33% of money lent out by the ECB on deposit. The percent now is over 70% (the ECB has lent out 664 billion euros in total) meaning things are in much worse shape in the EU than they were after Lehman Brothers collapsed. When money is trapped in the banking system, the economy suffers and extra stimulus measures don't help to revive it. EU money-printing measures meant to rescue its profligate debt-ridden members aren't likely to help its economy, which in turn will result in a self-feeding cycle of more and more debt (as happened in Japan during the last two decades) or more and more money printing (as has been taking place in the U.S. since the 2008 Credit Crisis). Like the U.S., the EU has run out of borrowing power, so debt without money printing is no longer an option.

Weaker economies mean more downgrades from the ratings agencies can be expected. On Friday, both France and Austria lost their coveted triple A ratings from S&P. They were downgraded a notch as was Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia. Italy, Spain, Portugal and Cyprus were downgraded two notches. Italy is now rated BBB+. The only countries in the eurozone that still have triple A ratings are Germany, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and Finland. S&P put the later three on negative outlook for a possible future downgrade however. The EFSF bailout fund itself may also be downgraded.

The current debt crisis that is now impacting the entire eurozone started in Greece in late 2009. The problems there have yet to be fixed despite numerous mainstream media reports to the contrary in the last two years. Greece is now on financial life support. Any missed bailout payment from the EU will send it immediately into default. Talks have broken down once again, but as before will once again be resuming shortly. The market has never been convinced that any of the proposed Greek bailouts will work.  On Monday, Greek one-year government bond yields hit a high of 416% and 10-year yields a high of 35%. These rates have continued to rise after each bailout proposal. Greece has to make substantial bond payments this March.

The EU's debt crisis is not getting resolved because it is no more possible to solve a debt crisis with more debt than it is to sober up a drunk by giving him more alcohol. Yet, every mainstream news article has comments from well-placed sources that are hopeful that some resolution will be coming to the EU's problems soon. Rarely is it mentioned they have been hopeful -- and wrong -- for the last two years as the situation has increasingly deteriorated. Nor is it mentioned that the Japanese with similar problems in their financial system have now been hopeful for twenty years that their economy will fix itself. Wishful thinking doesn't fix markets, nor do plans involving spining straw into gold -- no matter what central bankers and their toadies claim.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Risks to the Global Financial System in 2012

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.   
As 2012 begins, markets are rallying as they did at the beginning of 2011 -- a year when the S&P 500 closed flat after many huge moves up and down. The problems in Europe that rattled markets in 2011 have not been resolved and new problems are or will be emerging in China and Japan. At the very least, investors should expect another rocky ride in the upcoming year.

The debt crisis in the EU is far from over. It is simply being momentarily contained by another short-term solution that will hold things together for a while until the crisis erupts again. The mid-December LTRO (long term purchase operations) announced by the ECB excited the markets as any money-printing scheme would. This new "solution" to the debt crisis is essentially an attempt to handle a problem of too much debt with more debt. Already close-to-insolvent EU banks are able to hold fewer assets for collateral in exchange for cheap funding from the ECB, which can in turn be used to buy questionable sovereign debt from the PIIGS. While this will keep Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland financially afloat for a longer period of time, it may collapse troubled EU banks sooner (the real epicenter of the debt crisis). 

Half way across the globe, problems are emerging in China. It is estimated that there are between 10 and 65 million empty housing units in the country that investors have purchased with the hope of selling at higher prices. There are in fact entire "ghost districts" there that are filled with new buildings and no residents. Prices have become so high that by last spring the typical Beijing resident would have to have worked 36 years to pay for an average-priced home. The pressure appears to be coming off though with new home prices dropping 35% in November. Beijing builders still have 22 months of unsold inventory and Shanghai builders 21 months. In the peripheral areas, existing home sales have plummeted -- down 50% year on year in Shenzhen, 57% in Tianjin, and 79% in Changsha. Investors should take note that the Chinese real estate bubble is far worse than the U.S. one that brought the global financial system to its knees at the end of 2008.

Twenty years ago, Japan had a massive real estate bubble and it is possible that prices have finally bottomed there, but that doesn't mean that they are ready to go up. Japan has had two decades of economic stagnation (and is heading toward a third, if it is lucky) because of the collapse of its real estate and stock market bubbles. Massive borrowing by the government has prevented the situation from getting worse. The debt to GDP ratio in Japan is now estimated to be 229% (well above the just over 100% in the U.S.).  More people are leaving the workforce there than entering it and this bodes ill for tax receipts. The aging population is using up its savings instead of adding to them. This is a potentially serious problem because the massive debt the Japanese government has incurred has been funded mostly internally by the savings of the Japanese people. A lot of old debt has to be rolled over in 2012 and additional debt is still being incurred. Where the money will come from is not clear.

None of the problems that could strain the global financial system originated in 2011. They have been building up for years and even decades. The first major blow up was the Credit Crisis in 2008. In every case, that problem was "solved" by more debt and money printing. This approach has of course only postponed the inevitable since taking on more debt only creates a bigger debt problem down the road and you can't create something of value out of thin air by printing money (although you will ultimately create a lot of inflation). The markets have already spent most of 2011 in an unstable state. It looks like continuing and even bigger crises await investors in 2012.
Disclosure: None
Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security

Gold and Silver Plummet as Dollar Rallies on EU Woes

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The euro fell to a yearly low on December 14th as Italian interest rates at auction hit new highs. Collateral damage to the EU crisis is showing up not only in stock prices, but in the precious metals markets as well. 

The euro fell below the psychologically important 1.30 level in European trade and is testing support from last January. If it breaks that support (and it is pretty certain that it will), the 125 level is the next stop and 1.20 after that. The euro can be tracked through the ETF FXE. At the same time the euro is breaking down, the trade-weighted dollar has broken out. The dollar has been stuck at key resistance at 80 since September. It tested  this level both in September and in November. It traded as high as 80.67 in early morning trade. There is still strong resistance just under 82. A break above that will cause the dollar will head toward 88. The dollar can be tracked through the ETF DXY.

As the dollar rises, gold and other commodities fall. Spot gold was as low as $1562 an ounce in early New York trade. Gold plummeted after the New York open and was down as much as $68 an ounce.
Gold can be tracked through the ETF GLD. Gold decisively broke its 200-day moving average (which is very bearish) and this was the first time it has traded below this level since early 2009. The next level of support is the 65-week moving average, which is currently in the high 1400s.

While gold in general should go up during a crisis, this did not happen in the fall of 2008 -- gold was down around 30% at the time. During credit crises -- and the situation in Europe is a second global credit crisis -- it is reasonable for gold to decline. Central banks lease gold cheaply to banks and large hedge funds and they sell it on the market to raise quick cash (I have explained how this is done is some detail in my book "Inflation Investing"). This time around, there is the added danger that the IMF will sell some of its large hoard of gold to raise money for a eurozone bailout.

Gold's companion metal silver is much more volatile than the yellow metal and is influenced by the economy as well as financial market events. Silver traded as low as $28.47down $2.37 after New York trading opened. This was more than a 7% drop. Silver can be tracked through the ETF SLV. It has strong support around $26. If it breaks that, expect it to head toward the $21 level.

The EU debt crisis is not over and is likely to continue for a while longer and possibly for many more months. EU leaders have come up with one "solution" to the crisis after that has failed shortly after it was announced. Look to the markets to see whether or not their future gambits will create some viable end to their problems. So far the markets have made it very clear that the situation in Europe is continuing to deteriorate and it is dangerous to be on the long side of almost any investment except the U.S. dollar. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

October Consumer Confidence Well Into Recession Territory

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The October Consumer Confidence number fell to 39.8. It is once again approaching the all-time lows that occurred at the bottom of the Great Recession. The number has never reached the 90 level since 2009, which is the cutoff for a healthy economy. The continually poor levels of consumer confidence  bring into question whether the last recession ever really ended.

While U.S. consumers are gloomy about almost all aspects of the economy, they are most pessimistic about employment prospects. Only 3% of U.S. consumers think that jobs are plentiful. While it is true that this number could have been lower during the 1930s Depression when millions of ordinary Americans went hungry and were homeless, the lowest possible value is only zero. And the current reading could actually be zero since zero lies within the statistical margin of error for the survey. In contrast, those who say jobs are hard to get came in at 47% and that would definitely had been much higher during the 1930s.

The Present Situation Index — how consumers see the state of the economy currently — was a very dismal 26.3 in October. This number has remained at fairly low levels for four years now. What has caused the overall consumer confidence  number to rise has been expectations for a future improvement in the economy. The government and mainstream media has continually told U.S. consumers the economy is getting better and will continue to get better. So, consumers have told the survey takers that don't see things as being in good shape now, but they were hopeful about the future. Consumers are starting to lose hope however. The future expectations number fell from 55.1 in September to 48.7. Apparently, you can only fool the public for so long.

The "don't believe what you see with your own eyes, but believe what the government tells you" efforts are still going strong however. Media reports cited better retail sales and a big stock market rally since early October as indications that the U.S. economic situation is improving. Retail sales may have indeed gone up since they are not adjusted for inflation and higher prices make them look better even if fewer units are being purchased. As for the wild behavior of the stock market, explosive rallies are common in bear markets and not in bull markets. They can also occur at any point because of liquidity injections into the financial system from central bankers in Europe, the UK, and the U.S. as would happen during a banking crisis like the one currently taking place in the EU. They don't last for long however.

No matter how you look at the consumer confidence, the numbers are ugly. They are not just indicating recession, they are shouting recession. Only 11% of Americans think that business conditions are good.  The Present Situations Index has dropped six months in a row. Some of the components are at rock bottom levels. Yet, the government and mainstream media keep reporting that the economy is on track for improved growth in the second half of 2011. How can such diametrically opposed views be reconciled? The simplest way to explain the discrepancy is that someone is lying. Any guesses as to who that might be?


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

2011 Budget Deficit Third One Over a Trillion Dollars

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

U.S. budget deficit figures released on Friday afternoon indicate that the deficit for fiscal year 2011 (ending on September 30th) came in at $1.3 trillion. This is slightly higher than the 2010 deficit and the third trillion dollar deficit in a row.

Total federal spending (on-budget items) came in at $3.6 trillion. Revenues were $1.3 trillion, over 4% higher than in fiscal year 2010. Revenue rose slightly to $2.3 trillion. As bad as the budget deficit appears (and a trillion dollar deficit is really extreme), the Congressional Budget Office estimated in January that the 2011 budget deficit would reach $1.5 trillion. The fight over raising the budget deficit ceiling postponed federal spending for a few months until a deal was reached in August however. It is likely that this spending will show up in the 2012 fiscal year.

While there is a special congressional committee looking for $1.5 trillion in savings, its actions are not going to reduce the total federal spending by enough to reduce the budget deficit to something manageable. The amount being cut is for a 10-year period and averages only $0.15 trillion per year. If this had been done last year, the 2011 budget deficit would have been $1.15 trillion — still an astronomical amount.

It is also safe to assume that the budget deficit in the next five years can easily grow much faster than the intended cuts. When they did their projections for future fiscal years, the Obama administration assumed that U.S. GDP would be growing by over 5% a year until 2016. While this figure was never plausible because it is much higher than the potential growth rate of the U.S. economy, now that the U.S. is facing a possible recession and negative GDP growth, it is even more absurd.

Investors should assume that a continual stream of major budget deficits awaits the U.S. in the future. At this point, the massive cutting that is necessary to get the budget under control will cause a hit to the economy resulting in lower tax revenues, which in turn will make the budget deficit worse, not better.  This is the downward spiral that Greece currently finds itself in. More cutting actually is leading to a higher debt to GDP ratio. The U.S. debt to GDP ratio is approaching 100%. Once this number is over 90%, a country's economy becomes permanently weakened. When it reaches 150%, and it will  for the U.S. if its budget deficits remain as large as they currently are, the probability of default becomes almost 100% certain.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Manufacturing Goes Flat Throughout the World

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Purchasing manager surveys in a number of countries indicate that the manufacturing sector of the global economy has stalled. Recent readings in Europe, North America, and Asia are either slightly above or slightly below 50, the dividing point between expansion and contraction.

The U.S. ISM survey released on September 1st came in at 50.6, down 0.3 from July. While the number was still clinging to positive territory after 25 months, key components such as New Orders, Production, and Backlog of Orders were in contraction mode. Backlog of Orders was the lowest at 46.0. The highest component, as has been the case throughout the expansion, was Prices -- a measure of inflation.  While this reached an astronomical 82.0 just six months ago in February, it was a relatively tame 55.5 in August.  Not only is the manufacturing index not adjusted for inflation, but higher inflation makes it look better and this has been the case during the entire expansion.  

While manufacturing was still just barely expanding in the U.S., it was slightly contracting in Europe. The August Purchasing Managers Index for the 17-nation eurozone came in at 49.0, down from 50.4 in July.  Germany, the Netherlands and Austria had readings still above the neutral 50 level, while France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, and Spain were just below. The UK, not part of the eurozone, also had a PMI reading of 49.0 in August. This was down from 49.4 in July and was at a 26-month low.

China was either in expansion or in contraction depending on which survey you believe. The official survey produced by the Chinese government had a reading of 50.9, while an independent survey less subject to bias came in at 49.9. In both cases, the numbers are around the no growth level.

If only one region of the world had weakened manufacturing activity, it might not be meaningful. However, when it exists on three continents in major production centers, it is impossible to ignore. There has been an approximate two-year period of expansion fed by various stimulus measures, massive budget deficits, quantitative easing, and rock-bottom interest rates. While the low interest rates are still with us, the stimulus measures have waned and there are now minimal attempts to reign in deficit spending from its outsized levels. Even though there is still a lot of government support for the economy, this still doesn't seem to be enough for manufacturing to grow. 


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economists Don't See The Recession That Has Already Started

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

A just released survey of 43 mainstream economists polled this month by the AP pegs the chances of the U.S. falling into recession in the next year at only 26% (one in four). As a group, the economists predict the economy will expand by over 2% in the second half of the year. Other news that appeared with the survey results included an article about how food stamp use in the U.S. is skyrocketing - a highly unlikely occurrence during an economic recovery.

When deciding how much credence should be given to the current recession view of the economics profession, investors should consider how accurately they predicted the Great Recession - the worst one since the 1930s. The recession began in December 2007. That same month a survey of 54 mainstream economist was published by Business Week under the title, "A Slower But Steady Economy" (AP could have used the same title for its current survey). How many of these highly-paid top economists realized that the U.S. was in recession?  None, zero, nada, zilch. How many thought that the U.S. was about to experience the worst recession in almost 80 years? None, zero, nada, zilch.
Unless you have reason to believe that establishment economists have been regularly taking handfuls of smart pills in the last three years, it's unlikely that their views are any more accurate today.

Instead of listening to the miss-opinion of mainstream economists constantly being shoveled out by the mainstream media, investors would be wise to look at the hard evidence of what is actually taking place in the economy.  Approximately 46 million Americans (15% of the population) are on food stamps. The number has increased by 74% since 2007. One wonders how big the increase would have been without the economic "recovery" that has supposedly taken place. Many of the people who receive food stamps are employed part-time and sometimes full-time in low paying jobs. If so, they are not part of the unemployment statistics and are considered successful examples of the U.S. pulling itself out of recession.  

Of course having a large part of the country on food-aid is an expensive proposition. How exactly has the U.S. paid for this?  Well, one way is through the approximately $2 trillion in money that the Federal Reserve has printed since 2007. Two trillion dollars of phony money can really juice up an economy. Without it, the GDP would still be in a deep hole from its 2007 levels and the illusion of  economic recovery wouldn't exist. If it turns there's no free lunch after all, the U.S. is going to be hit with a very big inflation bill in the future. Don't expect Fed Chair Ben Bernanke to see this coming though. After all, the Fed remained oblivious to the Great Recession long after it had started. Even in the spring of 2008, their meeting notes indicate that they were still hopeful about avoiding the recession that had begun months before.  

Investors should expect an ongoing stream of articles in the next several weeks or even months about how the U.S. is not going to experience another recession. The stock market is sending a very different message though and even the fluffed up economic statistics the government produces are likely to  look a bit anemic this fall. But don't worry, establishment economists are optimistic as they always are when a recession begins.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security. Investing is risky and if you don't think you are capable of doing it yourself, seek professional advice.

Credit Crisis Déjà Vu

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

In September 2008, the markets were in sharp decline because of a bank-centered financial crisis. The authorities took action with bailouts and by buying bonds to prop up the market. Short selling of financial stocks was banned in order to stabilize the markets. Things are certainly different in 2011.  It's not that all of these events aren't happening again, they certainly are. This big difference is that now they are happening in August instead of September.

The geographic epicenter of the crisis has shifted as well. Europe is now dragging down the global financial system, whereas it was the United States that was doing the heavy lifting in 2008. Yet stocks have been down by similar amounts in continental Europe and in the U.S. this month. Whereas the U.S. was dealing with the failure of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, the EU is dealing with a selective default of Greek debt and trying to prevent new crises from arising in Spain and Italy (problems in Ireland and Portugal are on the back burner for now). Greece received its first bailout in May 2010 and then another bailout this July. The original terms of the new bailout require bondholders to take a 21% loss on their holdings. If the bondholders were just in Greece, this would not have major implications. However, French and German banks were major lenders to Greece. The Greek bailout is really a bailout for them.

Rumors have been rife that a number of French banks are in trouble and that S&P was going to downgrade them and France's AAA credit rating. Rumors also dogged Bear Stearns before its failure in March 2008. The company vehemently denied them, especially in the week before it collapsed. The SEC threatened to investigate and find the culprits spreading false rumors about Bear Stearns being in trouble. The SEC's case fell apart though after the company closed its doors. 

Any company, especially any bank, in trouble is going to publically deny it. So French banks denying that they are financially troubled, which they have done, is in and of itself meaningless. In this case, more credence can be given to S&P's statements on the matter. S&P denies it is about to downgrade the credit ratings for France or of the French banks rumored to be in trouble. It would look pretty foolish if it turned around and lowered them in the near future. S&P of course is still smarting from the reaction from its downgrade of U.S. debt from AAA to AA+. Even though the U.S. can't pay its everyday bills without borrowing money and this is as good a definition of insolvency as any, there was incredible outrage that S&P lowered its credit rating. After all, they had given the top rating to securitized mortgage bonds containing subprime loans and some of those borrowers had no income, no assets and no prospect for paying off their debts.

Another government reaction that took place in 2008 that is repeating itself in 2011 is a short selling ban. France, Spain, Italy and Belgium have just banned short selling of select financial stocks. On September 19, 2008, the U.S. banned short-selling on 799 financial stocks. Britain banned short selling on similar stocks the day before. Did it work back then?  No, it didn't. A large number of banks failed and many that didn't remained functioning only because of massive bailouts or because they were nationalized. 

Direct government takeovers were more common in the UK than the U.S. in 2008 and 2009, but just as the land of the free banned short selling, the supposedly capitalistic U.S. took over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and eventually GM (it had been lumped in with financial stocks as part of the short selling ban). It's not clear that the bailouts have yet to end either. In August 2011, Fannie Mae paid $500 million to buy servicing rights for 400,000 of Bank of America's worst-performing loans, loans with an unpaid balance of $73 billion. or these instead of Bank of America. Who exactly benefitted from this arrangement? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac back $5 trillion in loans and many of them are not likely to be paid off. This debt is not counted as part of the $14 trillion plus U.S. national debt, but at least some of it should be.   

In 2011, the ECB (European Central Bank) has established a Securities Market Program to buy government bonds of its troubled members in order to keep interest rates lower than the free market rate. Its first buys were Spanish and Italian bonds on August 8th. The U.S. Fed was a heavy buyer of bonds in September 2008, although it didn't announce its first quantitative easing program until late November of that year. It also denied at the time that it was engaging in quantitative easing. Most of QE 1 had already taken place by the time the Fed announced it. This highly relevant fact remained unmentioned.

So here we are in 2011 and we find events are very similar to what was taking place in 2008. Some of the players are different, the locations are different and the order things are happening may be a little different. But all in all, it looks like the more things change; the more they remain the same.  

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale 

Buy When There's Blood on the Street - Just Make Sure It's Not Your Own

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Monday August 8th, the first trading day after S&P downgraded U.S. debt, was a crash day in the American stock market.  Asia held up much better and so did much of Europe, except for Germany.

The Dow Industrials were down 635 points (5.55%), the S&P 500 was down 80 points (6.66%), Nasdaq was down 175 points (6.90%) and the Russell 2000 64 points (8.89%). The DAX in Germany was down slightly more than 5%, whereas the Nikkei in Japan and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong were down a little more than 2%.  A crash is traditionally defined as a drop of 5% or more in a day. The Nasdaq and Russell 2000 already had a crash day last week. U.S. stocks had numerous crashes during the Credit Crisis in 2008.

Stocks looked like they were about to enter freefall - a severe uninterrupted drop - around 3:00PM.  President Obama delivered a statement on the S&P downgrade and caused a temporary short-term move up instead. The market would have washed out otherwise and been ready for its first rally.

As is, the market is at the end of its first stage of selling, we may just have to wait a little longer.  The technical indicators on the daily charts have either hit their lowest points or are very close to them. Some short covering and opportunistic buying should lead to a quick sharp rally for a few days. This rally is for traders only. The weekly technicals have yet to bottom out and nothing longer term should be expected.  

Technical bottoms and price bottoms are not the same. The technicals will have to gather some strength before stocks can enter a new rally phase. The ultimate price bottom is probably as much as two months out, which would put it somewhere in October. Until then, choppy action that brings the indices intermittently lower should be expected. While the indices may not go a lot lower, individual stocks, especially small cap, high-beta stocks (those known for their volatility) can indeed go much lower. This also includes high flyers that have yet to have had a big drop. In major selloffs, almost everything goes down.

Once a bottom is established, the volatile stocks you wanted to avoid in the selloff are the ones you want to own. This is where you will make the most money. Small, emerging, and leveraged are the keys. Smaller cap stocks will go down the most and then back up the most (just make sure the drop was market related and not because the business of the company is threatened). Emerging markets, both the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as well as smaller ones will have the same up and down behavior. Russia was down 12% on August 8th for instance. You will do better still if you use leverage on your buys. There are ETFs that provide 200% and 300% exposure. For the emerging markets, these include LBJ (300% Latin America), YINN (300% China), RUSL (300% Russia), EDC (300% Emerging Markets), INDL (200% India) and UBR (200% Brazil). For small cap stocks, TNA (300% long the Russell 2000 index) is the most leveraged play.

Traders should be able to make good use of these ETFs to move in and out of the market. Investors with a longer-term perspective will want to wait until a market bottom has had time to fully develop.  

Disclosure: Waiting to buy.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S Credit Rating Downgrade - A Humpty Dumpty Moment

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

As everyone knows by now, S&P downgraded the U.S. sovereign debt rating from AAA to AA+ on Friday. While the extent of the downgrade is minor, the implications are major. As the recent debt ceiling negotiations revealed, the U.S. cannot run its day-to-day operations without borrowing money. It lives on credit (as do most countries in the world today) and anything that impacts its ability to borrow money has serious consequences.

It takes a lot for a credit rating agency to lower the credit rating of a top corporation or country. This is usually only done long after the actual credit worthiness has experienced a significant decline.  The last major Friday afternoon credit downgrade from the credit rating agencies was when they lowered Bear Stearns rating on March 14, 2008. The company didn't open its doors again the following Monday.  The rating agencies were also tardy with lowering the credit ratings of accounting fraud poster child Enron, although they all did finally lower its rating to junk status four days before it declared bankruptcy. Perhaps the best analogy to the current U.S. situation though is the AAA ratings given to a number of securitized bonds that held subprime mortgages. These turned out not to be worthy of a top credit rating after all.

The farcical nature of how the credit agencies determine the rating of U.S. government debt was made clear during the debt ceiling negotiations. Numerous articles in the press reported that failure to come to an agreement, which would allow the U.S. to continue to spend money it didn't have because it could borrow more, would be viewed as fiscally irresponsible! A more rational response would have been, it's quite obvious that the U.S. can't function without borrowing an increasing amount of money and it is therefore insolvent. Under such circumstances its credit rating should be at the junk level - a BB or less - not an AA+. Eventually, this might happen, but as was the case with Enron, this would mean the U.S. would likely be going under a few days later.

The difference between the AA+ credit rating and the BB or lower one is caused by the fantasy factor. The AA+ rating is based on the glorious financial past of the U.S. and ignores the current downward trajectory it is on. Before the debt ceiling problems temporarily curtailed spending for a while, the U.S. was on course for as much as a $1.65 trillion budget deficit. This represents 11% of the current GDP number of $15 trillion (there are many reasons to think GDP is substantially overstated). It is true, that the U.S. is not borrowing money to pay for most of this deficit however - it's printing it. Quantitative Easing 2, a form of money printing, conducted by the Fed covered 70% of the deficit in the first half of the year. A country doing this certainly does not deserve an AAA credit rating, nor does it deserve an AA+ credit rating unless you can make a case that a company engaged in the business of counterfeiting money also deserves a close to top credit rating.

The Obama administration complained that S&P overestimated future U.S. deficits by $2 trillion. What this means is that S&P refused to accept the pie-in-the sky budgets numbers that the government generates. If you look at these, you will see that they assume GDP growth of over 5% a year, each and every year, until 2016. One year of GDP growth over 5% would be good and continual annual GDP growth of over 5% for the U.S. economy just isn't possible. The budget scenario also assumes very low inflation, which would certainly not be the case if the high growth it assumes takes place.  A combined deficit of $20 trillion in the next decade instead of the administration's $7.7 trillion would be more plausible. S&P assuming $2 more is still ridiculously low.

The immediate impact of the U.S. credit downgrade will be to cap the credit rating of companies at AA+. The government of the country has to have the highest credit rating in that country because in theory it has no default risk. Economists say that governments can use their ability to tax to pay off their debts. Although as finances deteriorate it is much more likely governments will print money to pay off their debts. No fiscally solvent government ever engages in excess money printing however. The U.S. Fed had increased its balance sheet (a measure of money printing) by $2 trillion since 2007. It doesn't appear that the credit agencies are taking this into account.

The longer-term implications for the lowered credit rating are far more serious.  More downgrades are likely. Interest rates will go up. Money will leave the United States. The U.S. dollar will lose its reserve currency status and this will lower its value substantially. Higher interest rates and a falling currency will both be inflationary. 

The financial world operates very much on image and reputation. Once that's shattered, it can take years to repair it, if it can be done at all.  When Bear Stearns was downgraded in March 2008, the damage to its ability to operate in the financial markets was terminal. The company imploded like an overinflated balloon that had a pin stuck in it. Fortunately, this is not likely to happen to the U.S. - at least not yet.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
Author: Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Quantitative Easing Has Sent the Dollar Into Free Fall

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. dollar has been in free fall since the beginning of September. The Federal Reserve acting in concert with the ECB (European Central Bank) is behind the action. Most other countries are seeing rising currencies and this is going to hurt their economies and the American economy as well.

It's become a running joke globally that the U.S. follows a strong dollar policy because the evidence so blatantly contradicts this claim. Things have gotten even worse lately with the dollar-trashing activities of the Fed going into hyper drive in time for the November election.  The trade-weighted dollar (DXY) lost approximately 6% of its value in September alone. It is not coincidental that the Dow Jones Industrials went up more than 10% during the month or that gold hit one all-time high after another. Stock markets rise when a currency is being devalued. All commodities are priced in U.S. dollars, so all else being equal; a commodity's price has to go up when the dollar falls. Rising commodity prices under such circumstances do not indicate a robust economy, they indicate inflation.

A cheap currency is indeed a plus for a major exporter. Currently China is the prime example globally of a economy that benefits a great deal from a currency with a low value. The Chinese yuan (CYB) doesn't really float, it can only have a small change in value during any given time period, so it can remain underpriced. The EU has now joined the U.S. in demanding China let the yuan have a more realistic value. China denies it is manipulating its currency however. If this is the case, it should just let it float freely on world currency markets and the value would remain approximately the same. For some reason, China is reluctant to do this.

Unlike exporters, major importers like the U.S. do not benefit from declining currencies. For more than four decades, the U.S. has followed policies that have destroyed its industrial base. The private commercial sector is now 20% manufacturing and 80% services. A weaker dollar will give more business to the manufacturing 20%, while hurting the service sector's 80% with more inflation. It won't solve the U.S. unemployment problem. At the same time it will damage the economies of exporters by raising their costs for commodities and the prices of their goods. All in all, it's a lose/lose situation.

The Federal Reserve's new quantitative easing program, first announced in August, is what is undermining the dollar and wreaking havoc in global currency markets. The euro (FXE) has recovered to the 1.40 area, but this is also due to the almost $1 trillion Euro-TARP bailout of the EU currency. The Japanese yen keeps rising and hit another multi-year high today. The Japanese monetary authorities have intervened in the currency markets to stop the yen from climbing, but to no avail. The Swiss franc (FXF) broke above parity with the dollar in August. The Australian dollar (FXA) is about to follow the Swiss franc's lead. The Brazilian currency (BZF), one of the weakest on earth for much of the twentieth century, is beating the stuffing out of the U.S. dollar.    

The big drop in the dollar is not likely to continue much longer (although the charts indicate there could be another leg down). It is already causing destabilization in world markets and could lead to another global financial crisis if it does. If Fed Chair Bernanke continues with his enthusiasm for quantitative easing though, the dollar could hit an air pocket and wind up much lower overnight. While the Fed's interest in quantitative easing will probably cool suddenly after the election, it may continue to play its dangerous game of chicken with the dollar until then.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold, Bonds, and Currencies Move on Fed Money Printing

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Two-year Treasury notes sold at a record low auction yield on Monday. Gold hit another all-time high on Tuesday. The Australian dollar hit a two-year high on Wednesday. Excess Fed money printing ties all three events together.

The two-year Treasury has hit a series of all-time low yields in the last few months. The yield at Monday's auction was 0.441%. The two-year traded as low as 0.40% around the auction. How much lower it can go depends on how much money the U.S. Federal Reserve continues to print and what percent of that gets recycled into treasury bond purchases. The U.S. has to fund its massive deficits in some way and this is one way it is doing it.

At the same time that money printing is lowering yields on U.S. treasuries, it is raising the price of gold. Just as the 2-year has hit a series of record low yields, gold has hit a series of record high prices. Money printing devalues currency, so more has to be paid for any given unit of gold. A currency losing value is the very definition of inflation and gold is highly inflation sensitive for that reason.

Of all the currencies in the world, the Australian dollar trades closest to gold. Australia is also a fiscally responsible country compared to the debt ridden basket cases of Japan, the EU and the U.S. So the currency should be strong as is. U.S. money printing policy enhances its value however. Overall, the Australian currency should become and remain the strongest currency in the world thanks to the actions of the American Federal Reserve. The same actions are trashing the U.S. dollar.

While the Federal Reserve and its mainstream economist toadies claim deflation is a problem, the evidence points to the opposite. Excess money printing has always led to inflation and things will be no different this time. The other thing that will be no different this time is that the government bodies responsible for creating inflation will deny that it exists and when it becomes so obvious that it can't be covered up anymore, they will then deny responsibility. Before this continues any further, you might want to pick up some hard assets and strong currencies.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Are Gold and Silver Breaking Out?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Gold hit an all-time high yesterday. Silver is trying to challenge its high from March 2008. Both are inflation indicators and new highs indicate paper money is losing its value.

Spot gold came within a whisker of $1275 an ounce yesterday and was up 2% at its high. Spot silver traded around $20.54 at its peak and has so far been a bit higher today. Unlike the U.S. stock indices, both gold and silver are in secular (long-term) and cyclical (short-term) bull markets. Their recent rise was based on reports that the Federal Reserve would likely engage in more quantitative easing. The trade-weighted dollar (ETF: DXY) dropped significantly on the news and fell below its 200-day simple moving average. The dollar has been in a secular bear market for many years and usually moves in the opposite direction of the precious metals.

The technical indicators for gold (ETF: GLD) are somewhat overbought and look like they are losing strength. Silver (ETF: SLV), is more clearly overbought than gold, but the technicals look better overall. In strong bull markets, rallies can continue on weakening technicals however. News, as is always the case, can override all other considerations - although it will have to be news about liquidity and central bank money pumping and money printing.

As I have stated many times, there is already a lot of liquidity flowing into U.S. stocks and other investment markets in the last few months. Prices for almost all assets are rising because of this. Stocks continually went up on bad economic news during the summer and while some incorrectly interpret this to mean that the market is forecasting a better economy, this is wishful thinking. Look inside a number of economic reports and you will notice that rising prices are an important reason they don't look worse. The mainstream media does not report this however because the Federal Reserve keeps telling them that 'there is no inflation'. Apparently though, the Fed forgot to inform the gold and silver markets. Perhaps they should get a memo out right away and put 'rush delivery' on it.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Weekly Claims and Trade Deficit Not as Good as Reported

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stocks reacted enthusiastically to the weekly unemployment claims for the week ending September 3rd and to the improvement in the U.S. trade deficit during July. As usual, the mainstream media hyped up the headline number, but 'forgot' to report some important details.

Weekly claims falling the week before or during a major holiday is a hardly unusual and has nothing to do with an improving employment picture. The 451,000 number reported for the week before Labor Day was the lowest number since the week that contained the July 4th holiday. The problem is not that unemployment offices are closed, but the bureaucrats that tabulate the statistics can't work faster to produce the numbers in a timely fashion. In this report, apparently 9 states didn't have their numbers ready, so two of them estimated their numbers and the BLS estimated the numbers for the other seven. This information doesn't appear to have been included in the intitial press release from the BLS. Some bloggers caught on to it though and Bank of America sent out a note later about what had happened.  Stocks in both the U.S. and overseas rallied on the BLS release showing an improving jobs situation based on incomplete data.

The market was also excited about the trade deficit decreasing in July. While no trade deficit is definitely a good thing (something that hasn't occurred in the U.S. since the 1970s), this is not necessarily true for a lower trade deficit. If the trade deficit is decreasing because of surging exports, that is indeed a positive. If it is decreasing because of a big decline in imports, this can indicate business and consumers are spending less because of poor economic conditions. Falling imports accounted for most of the July decrease. Of the increase in exports, capital goods accounted for 82%. This is surprising considering the July durable goods report showed a significant decline in production of capital goods in the U.S. If exports are surging for capital goods, why is production falling?  There seems to be some contradiction here.

The stock market shouldn't have been happy with either of these government reports. Without the positive spin the mainstream media gave them, it probably wouldn't have been. The truth is that weekly unemployment claims have been continually at recession levels for over two years now and there is no evidence yet of their improvement (even a one week drop below the 400,000 recession level, quite possible before the election on November 2nd, wouldn't mean employment is on an upswing). As for the trade deficit, it was cut in half during the Credit Crisis because the economy was collapsing. An improving trade deficit can actually be sending a negative message. Investors need to know the details and the historical context of any given economic report before they can react appropriately to it. Lots of luck in getting that from the mainstream media.


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Japan's Economy Shows Limits of Keynesian Policies

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Second quarter GDP figures show that the Japanese economy has fallen behind China's and is now only the third largest in the world. Japan has engaged in 20 years of massive government stimulus programs and kept interest rates low, but this has failed to reignite GDP growth. Instead, its economy continues to slowly sink.

In the 1980s, Japan was an unstoppable economic juggernaut that everyone feared. It all ended when a spectacular stock market and real estate bubble blew up in the early 1990s. These bubbles were the ultimate outcome of excessive stimulus over many decades. Initially, that stimulus acted to revive the Japanese economy from the ruins of World War II. In the end, huge asset bubbles resulted. These collapsed throughout the 1990s and the first decade of the 2000s. One government stimulus program after another during that time only had temporary impact on the economy. As soon as the stimulus ended, economic growth disappeared. The U.S. is currently finding itself in the same situation.

A continual backdrop of close to zero short-term interest rates, known as ZIRP - zero interest rates policy - also did not revive the economy. Japanese government longer-term bond interest rates also collapsed, with the 10-year rate falling below 0.5% at one point. Extremely low government bond rates indicate too much liquidity exists in an economy and the government is getting too big a share of it. Businesses can be starved for capital under such circumstances and this in turn limits economic growth instead of stimulating it. This same pattern is emerging in the United States right now. The two-year bond interest rate has been at record lows for weeks. Rates fell to 0.48% this morning. The lowest rate during the Credit Crisis was 0.60%.

Keynesian economics became the almost universal approach for economic policy in the developed economies after World War II.  Keynes recommended initiatives, stimulus during a downturn and paying off the stimulus debt during the recovery, got horribly mangled to more and more stimulus during a downturn and somewhat less stimulus during a recovery. This is essentially an ongoing money-printing scam. Like many scams, it works well as long as it doesn't get out of control. Eventually though some huge crisis becomes inevitable after decades of excessive stimulus and the economy falls apart. Stimulus no longer works then. After two decades, the Japanese have failed to realize this. The economic establishment in the U.S. is equally oblivious.

China is only in the early stages of the stimulus manipulation of its economy and is now the world's current economic powerhouse. It surpassed the UK (the world's largest economy until the U.S knocked it out of the box around 1880) in 2005, Germany in 2007, and now Japan in 2010. Media reports in 2009, estimated that China would overtake Japan in 2012 or 2013.  Time seems to be speeding up. The Washington Post also predicted last year that China could overtake the U.S. as early as 2027, which was much sooner than other predictions, which are as late as 2040. Even 2027 might prove to be optimistic however.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Tale of 3 PMIs: China, the EU, and U.S.

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stock markets in Europe, Asia and the U.S. rallied strongly on August 1st even though reports from purchasing managers in China, the EU and the U.S. did not bode well for future economic activity.

In China, the HSBC PMI (purchasing managers index) for July was 49.4. This indicates Chinese manufacturing contracted last month (50 is the dividing point between expansion and contraction for all the PMI indices). The official Chinese government report though came in at 51.2, indicating a slight expansion was still taking place. China is the growth engine of the world economy and a downturn there has negative implications far and wide. Mainstream media tried to put a positive spin on the news by saying the Chinese government wanted to slow the Chinese economy down, so a drop in manufacturing activity is good news. What the government actually wanted to do was slow down the property bubble created by their massive stimulus program during the Credit Crisis. They did not wish to slow down activity related to exports, which is their bread and butter. That seems to be an unfortunate side effect of their actions however.

While the news out of China was unabashedly bad, traders in the EU were ebullient that the EU purchasing managers July number was revised up to 56.7 from a previous estimate of 56.5. This change is statistically meaningless. Based on the data available, it also looks like Germany was almost single-handedly responsible for the good number. Exports were the key. The big drop in the euro to 1.18 in early June (from around 1.50 late last year) would certainly have boosted exports from the EU since it made their goods much cheaper - and Germany's economy is export based. However, the report also indicated that export orders are slowing (as the euro rises) and new orders are well below this year's peak. The service providers in the report also had the most negative outlook for future activity in eight months.

The U.S. PMI was 55.5 for July, down from 56.2 in June. Of the components in the index, New Orders were down the most, dropping 5.0. The second biggest decline was in Production, which fell 4.4. The Backlog of Orders category was also lower by 2.5. All of these are indicators of future activity. The biggest increase in the report was Inventories, which were up 4.4. Looks like goods are being produced, but are piling up in the warehouse. Together, these components all seem to indicate that U.S. manufacturing will be slowing down later this year.

Manufacturing was the big success story of the stimulus spending that started during the Credit Crisis. This had a greater impact in China than in the Western economies because manufacturing is a greater component of their economy. In the U.S., the service sector is four times bigger than the manufacturing sector, so a buoyant manufacturing sector is not enough by itself to create a strong recovery. This is one reason the American economy remains lackluster despite $3 trillion in budget deficit spending in the last two years. Stimulus spending though will be declining in the U.S. and in the EU into the foreseeable future. We are already seeing what impact that will have based on the PMI reports coming out of China.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Q2 GDP Report: 5 Important Things You Need to Know

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Bureau of Economic Analysis reported today that GDP increased by 2.4% in the second quarter. First quarter GDP was revised up to 3.7%. The annual revisions for previous years indicated that the U.S economy contracted at an average annual rate of 0.2% between 2006 and 2009.

While 2.4% is in and of itself a fairly decent increase in GDP, the components that made up the increase are the key to interpreting how good it really is. To do this, it's necessary to know whether or not they are sustainable and even whether or not they are believable. Increases in some components are a negative because they ultimately lead to lower growth in the future. Inventories are the best example of this. Others, such as increased government spending are at best neutral because they don't indicate an improvement in the private economy. If spending isn't going to be increased further in the future, then this also indicates lower GDP going forward. Finally, some numbers simple don't match up with other government reports, observations of reality, or economic definitions. If they don't, they are obviously inaccurate.

So how do the GDP numbers stack up in the latest report?  Based on the official news release from the BEA, which can be found at: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm, it can be seen that:

1. Inventory increases added 1.05% to second quarter GDP. Based on the annual revision, they added 2.64% to first quarter GDP or 71% of the total increase. Inventories were also responsible for approximately two-thirds of the GDP increase in the fourth quarter of 2009. The entire economic 'recovery' has essentially been an inventory adjustment. This does not bode well for the future.

2. Government spending was up across the board in Q2. Federal spending increased by 9.2% in the second quarter versus 1.8% in the first quarter. State and local spending was up 1.3% this quarter versus a decline of 3.8% last quarter. The second quarter was when stimulus spending was at its maximum. So expect less of a contribution from government spending to future GDP and lower numbers as a result.

3. The most obvious fantasy figures in the report was the new home construction figure. This supposedly increased by a whopping 27.9%, even though the Commerce Department's New Residential Structures report (more commonly known as new home sales) indicated a 6% decline quarter to quarter and an 8% decline year over year. Nor is there any evidence of a massive increase in new home inventories or any real world evidence indicating a huge building boom. This number is impossible.

4. Somewhat suspicious is the increase in investment on business structures (commercial real estate). This was up for the first time since Q3 2008. The big increase in banks going under that is currently taking place is being caused by commercial loans going bad, yet commercial construction is now on an upswing? Perhaps work on the BP oil spill juiced up this number. Interestingly, the UK also reported a huge increase in construction spending last quarter as well, although there is little evidence of much construction going on there. BP is headquartered in the UK, but it spent its money to handle the oil spill in the U.S.

5. The most ridiculous claim of all was the revised figures for 2008 GDP. Based on original reports, GDP increased by almost 3% in 2008, a very good rate, even though it is universally acknowledge that the U.S. was experiencing the worst economic downturn since the 1930s Great Depression. GDP is supposed to decrease during a recession, not go up. In the revision in July 2009, GDP for 2008 was revised downward to plus 0.4%. In the current revision, GDP growth for 2008 is now listed as 0%. Perhaps after another 15 to 20 revisions it will get to a more reasonable number. The history of 2008 GDP indicates the U.S. can overstate its GDP by a total of 6% to 9% in its initial reporting. Keep that in mind when you read that GDP was up 2.4% last quarter.


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

G-20 Meeting's Deficit Goals Are Meaningless

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The G-20 met this weekend and set a goal that member countries should cut their deficits in half by 2013. The agreement also calls for G-20 countries to start reducing their deficit to GDP ratio by 2016. Even with such easy to reach targets, success is by no means guaranteed.

For some reason the G-20 recently woke up and realized countries can't continue to forever spend a lot more than their income from tax receipts. Some of them have been doing just this for many decades at this point. The statement released from the meeting said, "Sound fiscal finances are essential to sustain recovery, provide flexibility to respond to new shocks, ensure the capacity to meet the challenges of aging populations, and avoid leaving future generations with a legacy of deficits and debt."  So at least ten years after the horse has left the corral, the G-20 now wants to close the gait.... but not all the way.

The original proposal for cutting deficits in half was changed from would to should because Japan, the U.S. and India objected. No one actually seems to think that Japan will be able to accomplish this goal. Japan is the most indebted major country on earth with its debt to GDP ratio reaching over 200% this year. Interestingly, the long-term budget projections of the Obama administration are for a deficit of $778 billion for 2013, which would be less than half of the $1.6 trillion projected budget deficit for 2010. The 2013 figure is still almost double the biggest deficit prior to the Credit Crisis however. It also assumes robust GDP growth and minimal inflation during the next few years. Another recession or rising inflation could easily move the U.S. deficit numbers back to well above a trillion dollars. 

European markets were up on the news today and the U.S. market is rallying slightly as well in morning trade. It should be clear to the markets that world leaders are not really serious about reducing government spending. Although, the markets might be worried that even small spending reductions could turn the global economy back down and risk another recession - assuming the first recession actually ended that is.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.