Will Fed Meeting Be a Turning Point for Stocks?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Fed has its August meeting today and stocks sold off in the morning despite media attempts to put a positive spin on the outcome. The latest phase of the rally that started in early July took place after Ben Bernanke admitted to congress that the U.S. economy was troubled. Stocks shouldn't have rallied on this news, but they did.

The stock market is supposed to be a leading indicator of the economy and should react to changes approximately six months in advance. This only works in a free market however. The more the authorities are fiddling with the financial system behind the scenes, the less stock prices will act as an early warning system. The bull market peaked in October 2007 for instance, but a recession began only two months later.

This time, U.S. stocks peaked on April 26th. May and June were bad months for the market. While stocks have not gotten back to their highs, they have been rallying since the beginning of July, when problems in the eurozone calmed down (thanks to a commitment of an almost trillion dollar bailout for the currency). The rally entered a second phase after Ben Bernanke testified before congress about the bleak prospects for the U.S. economy. The market sold off that day, but then mounted a rally on the bad news, which was supported by numerous economic reports showing the economy was turning down.

Why would anyone buy stocks when the economy was facing a possible recession? While this behavior doesn't make sense, a better question is: Who was buying stocks after this news came out? Based on the trading volume, not many market participants were entusiastic. With the exception of a few days of selling, the entire rally since early July has taken place on below average volume - a technical negative.

The 50-day moving average for volume has also been declining as well since early July. This is part of a greater trend that started in March 2009, when the bigger rally began. Volume peaked on the Dow Industrials when the market hit bottom and back then there were days when over 600 million shares were traded. More than a year later, a day when over 200 million shares traded would be considered good volume.

The market seems to be rallying on the hopes of Fed easing. With fed funds rates at zero, the traditional forms of easing are obviously no longer available. The Fed would have to engage in quantitative easing (a form of money printing), which would involve the purchase of treasury bonds and this would lower their interest rates. According to mainstream media reports, consumers and businesses would supposedly borrow and spend more money as a result. This is wishful thinking at best.

Even though the Fed has lowered interest rates to nothing and has effectively provided the big banks with free money, this has not been passed on to the consumer. Interest rates on credit cards were 14.55% in 2005 and in May 2010 they were 14.48% (see: http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g19/Current). Banks have not lowered their interest rates in response to the Fed's recent actions, but have pocketed the difference. This has been the major reason that they have been reporting such huge profits. It is naive to think that they are going to change their behavior.

Disconnects between markets and the underlying economy have happened many times. They don't last forever however. The two eventually have to meet. Either the economy improves to justify market pricing or market prices decline to meet the economy. The tech bubble at the end of the 1990s and the more recent real estate bubble were good excellent examples of this. Pricing that is too high will come back down to earth and the correction can last for years. Government attempts to try to hold up the market, as has happened with real estate prices, don't prevent the inevitable, they merely delay it. The current disconnect with stock prices and the economy will also self-correct and may do so suddenly. The only question is when it will occur.


Disclosure: No Positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Less Credit and Income = More Consumer Spending?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


As of June, consumer borrowing has now dropped 16 out of the last 17 months. Credit Card debt has fallen 21 months in a row. The personal savings rate in June rose to 6.4% from 2.1% before the recession began. Wages and Salaries are down 3.6% in the last two and half years. Despite decreased credit and income and increased savings, all three of which are negatives for consumer spending, GDP figures claim American consumers are buying more.

U.S. GDP growth has been fueled by consumer borrowing for many years. Consumer credit grew faster than GDP before the Credit Crisis hit, but is now moving in reverse.  June 2010 total credit card debt (revolving credit) has now fallen below the November 2005 level. American consumers over the decades have accumulated far too much debt and deleveraging is a trend that is likely to go on for many years. This is certainly a negative for an economy that has been built on consumer spending. Even with consumer credit staying steady, it would be hard for the GDP to rise.

The reduction in consumer borrowing is not a voluntary process. The big banks are cutting credit limits, cancelling cards and demanding pay downs. Consumers are choosing to save more though. The savings rate was only 2.1% in 2007. Then it was 4.1% in 2008 and 5.9% in 2009. It was 6.0% or over each month of the second quarter of 2010. More savings means less consumer spending and this trend is likely to continue as long as consumers feel insecure about the economy.

According to the BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis), wages and salaries of U.S. workers have declined only 3.6% since the first quarter of 2008. This small drop is really surprising considering the unemployment rate was 5.0% in December 2007 and was 9.5% in July 2010. More government jobs and government subsidized jobs prevented this number from being much worse.

Even more amazing, total personal income actually increased by 1.5% during this time. How is this possible during a recession?  Examining the figures indicates that there was a 27% increase in 'Government Social Benefits to Persons' in the last nine quarters. These various forms of stimulus payments, which are essentially welfare, along with government subsidized employment, were paid for by the approximately $3.5 trillion in deficit spending in 2008, 2009, and 2010. This has been the major source of funds for consumer spending recently.

So even though consumers have been borrowing less, the government has been borrowing more and giving the money to consumers to spend (or at least to some consumers). This is equivalent to the 'bread and circus' of Roman times. It is not a sustainable model for economic growth. Nor is it even honest to claim that this is actually economic growth. We don't exactly live in an age of financial honesty however - and that is another trend that can be expected to continue.

Some of the data for this article can be found at: http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.aspSelectedTable=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010).

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bernanke Testimony Indicates Fed Still in Denial

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Fed Chair Ben Bernanke testified on Capitol Hill today and didn't disappoint. As usual, his lack of insight into the true state of the U.S. economy boggles the mind.

The key takeaway from Bernanke's remarks is that the U.S. economy is strong enough to withstand the fiscal tightening ahead. Bernanke then promptly undermined this claim by admitting that the housing market has "firmed only a little" since mid-2009 and that it will take a long time before 8.5 million jobs lost during the Credit Crisis will be restored. What Bernanke left out was that even though the federal government has spent trillions on bailouts and efforts to directly and indirectly prop up the U.S. housing market, it has managed to get only slightly better. As for the jobs lost, what will that number be after the 1.2 million temporary Census workers are let go in the next few months? A 10 million lost job figure is probably more realistic.

It is of course not surprising the U.S. economy has gotten better after the government has pumped trillions of dollars in extra spending into it and given banks credit at zero percent interest. What is surprising is how little improvement there has been given these extraordinary and unsustainable measures. There is little evidence of private sector hiring in the job market and moreover the weekly unemployment claims are stuck over the 400,000 number that indicates layoffs are taking place at a recessionary level. The U.S. economy is also dependent on consumer spending. This accounted for 72% of GDP before the Credit Crisis. Consumers not only have job problems, but they are also losing access to credit. While credit card debt is dropping rapidly, there was a minuscule increase of $1.0 billion increase in overall consumer credit in April. Loans held by the federal government increased by $1.7 billion.

Nevertheless, Bernanke is confident that "gains in final demand will sustain the recovery in economic activity" even though "support to economic growth from fiscal policy is likely to diminish in the coming year". Bernanke went on to state the federal budget deficit is was estimated to decrease by $500 billion in fiscal year 2011. It was not clear where in the private sector the 'final demand' would be coming from to make up the reduced spending from the federal government. It certainly doesn't look like it will be coming from the over leveraged American consumer. As for the reduction in the budget deficit, prior to the last year of the Bush administration, the record budget deficit in total was less than $500 billion. A reduction by that amount now indicates the federal government will be spending $1.1 trillion more than it is taking in during 2011. That is still an enormous amount of deficit spending and hardly indicates an economy that can function on its own without constant ongoing government stimulus.

What led to the tragedy of the Great Depression in the 1930s were major missteps from the Federal Reserve and the federal government. The Fed put the interests of the banking community over those of the American public and this is what turned a bad recession into a bad depression. This was combined with an ongoing campaign of denial of the problem on Washington's part. Herbert Hoover gave a press conference in June 1930 announcing the Depression was over (it was only just beginning). The similarities to all the talk coming out of Washington today about economic recovery should give investors pause.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Consumer Spending: Not Indicating Economic Recovery

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Commerce Department released figures for February consumer spending on March 29th. The report indicated that consumer spending was up 0.3% in February, but personal incomes were flat. The savings rate was lower though, dropping to 3.1% from 3.4% in January. Spending increases were highest for necessities, such as food and clothing. Spending on non-durables actually fell. Nevertheless, somehow the mainstream media looked at these figures and concluded, "Both the spending and income figures in Monday's report point to a modest economic recovery".

Now for a dose of reality.

If income is not going up, but consumer spending is going up, there are only three possible explanations. Consumers have either gotten increased credit and are borrowing more, they are spending savings, or they are selling assets.  If they are spending savings or selling assets to support their spending, the economy is in very bad shape, somewhat similar to the way it was during the Great Depression in the 1930s. Since the savings rate was still a positive number, consumers were not taking more money out of their savings accounts than they were putting into them. So consumers were still saving, but at a lower rate. The 'Personal Incomes and Outlays' report (that's its official name) doesn't analyze buying and selling of assets, but does have a figure on 'Personal Income Receipts on Assets' that includes interest and dividend income. This number decreased by $16.5 billion in both February and January and that may indicate that the public is quite possibly a net seller of assets. Consumer credit is also not handled in the report, but the latest figures from the Federal Reserve indicate that revolving (read credit card) consumer credit declined at a 2.5% annualized rate in January.

While the sources for the supposed increases in U.S. consumer spending are murky at best, the amount of consumer spending in and of itself is not a determinant of whether or not economic recovery is taking place. The increased spending needs to come from economic growth and not government spending. If it comes from more government spending, better numbers are just a shell game and are actually an indicator of just how troubled the economy really is.  U.S. consumer spending rose $34.7 billion in February. Of that amount, $16.6 billion came from an increase in federal government transfer payments. That is only the one-month change in federal spending being funneled directly into consumer's pocket. Government support for the U.S. economy has increased substantially and in myriad ways since the beginning of the recession in December 2007.

While consumer credit has declined significantly since the Credit Crisis began, government borrowing has increased to make up the slack. This is why the U.S. is facing a $1.6 trillion budget deficit in fiscal year 2010.  The record levels of government borrowing are propping up the entire U.S. economy, including consumer spending. Governments don't spend more when economies recover; they spend less. Only when U.S. government spending begins to decline sharply and reports come out that consumer spending is increasing should investors consider believing that economic recovery is really taking place.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Market Says U.S. Treasuries Riskier Than Corporate Debt

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,  New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Impossible Contradictions of U.S. Consumer Spending

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Consumers are the key to any U.S. economic recovery since they account for around 70% of GDP. Revised 2009 fourth quarter GDP figures just released indicate that consumer spending rose 1.7% on an annualized basis. This was after a reported 3.8% rise in the third quarter. These numbers are certainly good and indicate an economy on the mend if they are accurate. Unfortunately, there is little likelihood that they are.

To spend more money, consumers have to have more money. They can get the extra money through higher compensation (such as wages), larger interest and dividends payments, by drawing down savings or by being given additional credit. All of these numbers for 2009 indicate that consumers had less money to spend. According to BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis) figures updated as of February 26, 2010 and the latest Federal Reserve credit statistics, the following changes took place during 2009:

Employee Compensation     Down    3.2%
Interest Income                   Down    4.9%
Dividend Income                 Down  16.4%
Revolving Credit                 Down     9.5%
(mostly Credit Cards)

Consumers not only had less income and credit available, they also saved more. The U.S. savings rate went up from 3.8% at the end of 2008 to 4.1% at the end of 2009. So consumers earned less money and then on top of that they saved more of that smaller amount of money. Their borrowing power dropped as well. Yet, while this is happening the government keeps reporting consumer spending is going up. There seems to be some sort of contradiction here.

The recent GDP figures indicate that this mystery can be explained by a huge drop in personal tax payments in 2009. The government claims that individual taxes dropped 25.8% during the year, an amount that is much, much bigger than the decline in income and which occurred during a period when there was no major federal tax cut (there were numerous small ones for certain groups in the stimulus package). The supposed large drop in taxes paid gave U.S.consumers an increase in disposable income. They apparently went out and spent it all immediately.

Based on the above information, there are those who might not believe that U.S. consumer spending is actually increasing. For instance, people who took first grade arithmetic and have at least some minimal attachment to reality are likely to be skeptical. If on the other hand, the average U.S. taxpayer cut their tax bill by 26% last year (presumably a number of people got 30% and even 40% reductions) while experiencing only a small drop of income, I am obviously out of the loop. In that case, please send me the name of your accountant ... unless of course he or she has been indicted or is already in prison.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Greek Crisis Impacts World Currencies and Gold

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Consumer Credit - Being Held Up by Government Loans

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Consumer spending is the lifeblood of the American economy. Before the Credit Crisis, it was responsible for 72% of U.S. GDP. American consumers don't spend the money they have though, but depend on the money they can borrow. Aggregate U.S. household debt (including mortgages) is actually so large that it is bigger than the enormous government national debt. Consumer Credit has been crimped however since the recession began in December 2007 and experienced the longest continual drop in on record in 2009 and the biggest single month drop ever last November (records go back to 1943). Without a big increase in credit from government loans, things would have been even worse.

The Consumer Credit figures don't include mortgages and other real estate related loans. The total outstanding for these other loans was $2.7 trillion as of December 2009. The total in December 2007 was also $2.7 trillion (there was actually a minor $23 billion increase between the two periods). While it looks like Consumer Credit managed to remain flat for the last two years, this doesn't tell the whole story by any means. A big drop in one area was offset by a rise in another, and that took place only because of federal lending. 

There are two types of consumer credit - revolving and nonrevolving. Revolving is mostly credit card debt. Nonrevolving loans are for fixed periods, such as auto loans and student loans. Credit for revolving loans fell 8% between December 2007 and December 2009. The drop was even bigger from December 2008 to December 2009. While credit card debt was falling (there was a period of 15 months with consecutive drops), nonrevolving loans were increasing and have grown 7% so far since the beginning of the recession. While the Cash for Clunkers program certainly fueled car loans in this category, these are not counted as government loans in the credit statistics. Those government loans that are counted, such as student loans, increased by 89% between the end of 2007 and the end of 2009.  All government loans are in the nonrevolving category, without them revolving credit would have experienced a two-year drop, not a 7% gain.

Decreasing Consumer Credit is not surprising. American consumers were over leveraged before the recession began. Banks have been encouraged by regulators to tighten their lending standards and reports indicate that consumers are having trouble getting bank loans. Unemployment has soared, so this should be the case since fewer consumers are credit worthy. The February employment report indicated that approximately a million workers left the labor force between December 2009 and the early part of 2010 (this is the only way the numbers add up). Consumers have also been saving more because of the poor economy.
Despite less credit, a loss of income from less employment, and less money available for spending because of increased savings, the U.S. government has been reporting that consumers are spending more. The Consumer Credit figures indicate that it's not the consumer, but the government that's spending more.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Will EU Accept Greece's Trojan Horse of Debt?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Consumers Lack Confidence, They Also Lack Credit

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Before the Credit Crisis began, consumer spending made up 72% of U.S. GDP.  The current economic numbers indicate that there is little chance that this part of the economy will be recovering any time soon. Consumers have neither the desire to spend, nor the availability of funds to make it possible.

The Conference Board's consumer confidence numbers for January came in at 55.9. The historic average is 95 and somewhere around 90 is considered the dividing point between bad and good. While it is true that the current number is better than the depression level all-time low of 25.3 in February 2009, the readings have been range bound between around 50 since last June. The numbers indicate quite clearly that consumers are in no mood to shop. Even if they were, where would they get the money? 

The dismal job picture with 10% unemployment (not including discouraged workers and people forced to work part-time, which brings the U.S. unemployment number to the 17% to 20% level) is only one reason that consumers won't spend. The latest figures from November 2009 indicate that consumer credit was falling at an 8.5% annual rate. Revolving credit (much of which is credit card debt) was falling at an 18.5% annual rate. The big banks that took TARP money with the understanding that they would increase lending have increasingly cut consumers off.

The lack of consumer spending would have had more serious impact on U.S. GDP figures if large increases in government spending hadn't taken up the slack. Government subsidies have held up the housing and the auto markets, but this is completely artificial and produces only an illusion of economic recovery, rather than the real thing. Investors should keep in mind that no sustainable U.S. economic recovery is possible without the participation of the consumer. Otherwise, no matter how good the GDP numbers are in any given quarter, the improvement will only be temporary.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Home Sales Fall Expectedly

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.