Buy When There's Blood on the Street - Just Make Sure It's Not Your Own

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Monday August 8th, the first trading day after S&P downgraded U.S. debt, was a crash day in the American stock market.  Asia held up much better and so did much of Europe, except for Germany.

The Dow Industrials were down 635 points (5.55%), the S&P 500 was down 80 points (6.66%), Nasdaq was down 175 points (6.90%) and the Russell 2000 64 points (8.89%). The DAX in Germany was down slightly more than 5%, whereas the Nikkei in Japan and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong were down a little more than 2%.  A crash is traditionally defined as a drop of 5% or more in a day. The Nasdaq and Russell 2000 already had a crash day last week. U.S. stocks had numerous crashes during the Credit Crisis in 2008.

Stocks looked like they were about to enter freefall - a severe uninterrupted drop - around 3:00PM.  President Obama delivered a statement on the S&P downgrade and caused a temporary short-term move up instead. The market would have washed out otherwise and been ready for its first rally.

As is, the market is at the end of its first stage of selling, we may just have to wait a little longer.  The technical indicators on the daily charts have either hit their lowest points or are very close to them. Some short covering and opportunistic buying should lead to a quick sharp rally for a few days. This rally is for traders only. The weekly technicals have yet to bottom out and nothing longer term should be expected.  

Technical bottoms and price bottoms are not the same. The technicals will have to gather some strength before stocks can enter a new rally phase. The ultimate price bottom is probably as much as two months out, which would put it somewhere in October. Until then, choppy action that brings the indices intermittently lower should be expected. While the indices may not go a lot lower, individual stocks, especially small cap, high-beta stocks (those known for their volatility) can indeed go much lower. This also includes high flyers that have yet to have had a big drop. In major selloffs, almost everything goes down.

Once a bottom is established, the volatile stocks you wanted to avoid in the selloff are the ones you want to own. This is where you will make the most money. Small, emerging, and leveraged are the keys. Smaller cap stocks will go down the most and then back up the most (just make sure the drop was market related and not because the business of the company is threatened). Emerging markets, both the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as well as smaller ones will have the same up and down behavior. Russia was down 12% on August 8th for instance. You will do better still if you use leverage on your buys. There are ETFs that provide 200% and 300% exposure. For the emerging markets, these include LBJ (300% Latin America), YINN (300% China), RUSL (300% Russia), EDC (300% Emerging Markets), INDL (200% India) and UBR (200% Brazil). For small cap stocks, TNA (300% long the Russell 2000 index) is the most leveraged play.

Traders should be able to make good use of these ETFs to move in and out of the market. Investors with a longer-term perspective will want to wait until a market bottom has had time to fully develop.  

Disclosure: Waiting to buy.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Consumer Credit - Being Held Up by Government Loans

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Consumer spending is the lifeblood of the American economy. Before the Credit Crisis, it was responsible for 72% of U.S. GDP. American consumers don't spend the money they have though, but depend on the money they can borrow. Aggregate U.S. household debt (including mortgages) is actually so large that it is bigger than the enormous government national debt. Consumer Credit has been crimped however since the recession began in December 2007 and experienced the longest continual drop in on record in 2009 and the biggest single month drop ever last November (records go back to 1943). Without a big increase in credit from government loans, things would have been even worse.

The Consumer Credit figures don't include mortgages and other real estate related loans. The total outstanding for these other loans was $2.7 trillion as of December 2009. The total in December 2007 was also $2.7 trillion (there was actually a minor $23 billion increase between the two periods). While it looks like Consumer Credit managed to remain flat for the last two years, this doesn't tell the whole story by any means. A big drop in one area was offset by a rise in another, and that took place only because of federal lending. 

There are two types of consumer credit - revolving and nonrevolving. Revolving is mostly credit card debt. Nonrevolving loans are for fixed periods, such as auto loans and student loans. Credit for revolving loans fell 8% between December 2007 and December 2009. The drop was even bigger from December 2008 to December 2009. While credit card debt was falling (there was a period of 15 months with consecutive drops), nonrevolving loans were increasing and have grown 7% so far since the beginning of the recession. While the Cash for Clunkers program certainly fueled car loans in this category, these are not counted as government loans in the credit statistics. Those government loans that are counted, such as student loans, increased by 89% between the end of 2007 and the end of 2009.  All government loans are in the nonrevolving category, without them revolving credit would have experienced a two-year drop, not a 7% gain.

Decreasing Consumer Credit is not surprising. American consumers were over leveraged before the recession began. Banks have been encouraged by regulators to tighten their lending standards and reports indicate that consumers are having trouble getting bank loans. Unemployment has soared, so this should be the case since fewer consumers are credit worthy. The February employment report indicated that approximately a million workers left the labor force between December 2009 and the early part of 2010 (this is the only way the numbers add up). Consumers have also been saving more because of the poor economy.
Despite less credit, a loss of income from less employment, and less money available for spending because of increased savings, the U.S. government has been reporting that consumers are spending more. The Consumer Credit figures indicate that it's not the consumer, but the government that's spending more.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Will EU Accept Greece's Trojan Horse of Debt?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Inflation Versus Recession

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold hit its second highest price ever yesterday. Interestingly, the U.S. dollar is not close to its all time low. For any given dollar level, gold prices have been rising over time. Inflation is when a currency decreases in value and this has been happening for the dollar when measured against gold. Looking at the value of one currency versus another can obfuscate that inflation is taking place. All fiat currencies are declining in value against gold and this indicates that a widespread global inflation is taking place.

The trade-weighted dollar fell as low as 77.02, but closed at 77.19 yesterday. This is well below the 78.33 breakdown level. The dollar is at an 11 month low and even if it stays at current levels or rises somewhat will hit a yearly low within 3 weeks. This will be very bearish. The U.S. dollar is already at a yearly low against the euro and Australian dollar, both of which hit new highs yesterday.

While inflation is taking place, the same thing can't be said about an economic recovery. Consumer spending accounts for 72% of U.S. economic activity and under current conditions can not improve in the foreseeable future. Consumer Credit for July was released yesterday and it fell by $21.55 billion or at a 10.4% annual rate. Credit card debt fell at an 8.5% annual rate. It was the 11th straight monthly drop. While consumer credit is contracting, so is consumer income. At the same time, the savings rate is rising. All three indicate less consumer spending and ongoing contraction in almost three-quarters of the U.S. economy.

The one-month drop in consumer credit in July was four times greater than the entire consumer debt in the U.S. in 1944. The 60 plus year post World War II expansion was fueled by ever increasing consumer credit. Like all expansions inevitably do, this one has come to an end. Initially, there was real growth that went along with the expansion, but in the last three decades U.S. growth has been based on increased spending made possible through excess credit. Going forward inflation is going to make this impossible.

NEXT: CFTC Kills Off DXO

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Inflation Versus Deflation Argument - Part 5

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

If the deflationists aren't really discussing consumer price inflation, what is it that they are really talking about? To figure this out, it is helpful to seperately analyze the two components of the deflationist argument, bank credit and money supply, since they operate in very different ways and combining them obfuscates the picture.

Since people don't take out a bank loan to buy a quart of milk or a tank of gas, but they do borrow to buy a house and financial instruments, there is a direct relationship between bank credit and asset prices. The effects of increases or decreases in bank credit are likely to show up relatively quickly in prices for real estate, bonds, and stocks. Only much lately are they likely to impact consumer prices and even then they will represent only one of many components (currency exchange rates being potentially far more important).

This proposed direct relationships between credit and asset prices and currency and consumer prices seems to be well supported by real world observations. In the late 1920s U.S. there was a massive increase in credit and strong bull markets in housing, stocks, and bonds, yet consumer prices were dropping. Even though the U.S. currency didn't float at the time, capital was flowing into the New York from around the world and if the value of the dollar had been market driven, it's exchange rate would have been rising. A similar picture exists for Japan in the 1980s, although there was an even more massive asset bubble and the Yen was experiencing a far more significant rise that the U.S. dollar would have had in the 1920s.

In contrast, the U.S. in the 2000s was a period of declining currency values, the dollar peaked in 2002 and lost more than a third of its value by 2008. Bank credit expansion during this period led to massive bubbles in real estate and related debt instruments, with the S&P testing its 2000 bubble high in late 2007. When bank credit began its severe retraction, prices for real estate, non-government bonds, and stocks had significant drops. Consumer prices on the other hand accelerated higher. One major reason was the rising price in commodities. Since commodities are priced in dollars, they will go up if the U.S. dollar goes down.

The other component of the deflationist argument, money supply, has an obvious lagged effect on consumer prices. Changes can show up many years later. An examination of a money supply chart from the 1970s illustrates this quite clearly. M3 growth peaked in 1971, yet U.S. consumer price inflation didn't have an intermediate term peak until 1974 and the final high wasn't reached until 1980. The large rise in M3 in 2008 isn't likely to have its full impact on consumer inflation until some time in the 2010s.

Since deflation inevitably follows serious inflation, the deflationists at some point will be correct that there will be deflation in the United States. Worrying about deflation now though is like closing your windows and turning up your heat in May because you are worried about a cold winter coming.

For notes related to this talk, please see, 'Inflation vs Deflation Argument' at:http://investing.meetup.com/21/Files

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

For more about us, please see our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21