Lying with Statistics: the September Jobs Report

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

One month before the presidential election, there was suddenly a major reversal in unemployment trends that have taken place during the entire administration of the Obama presidency. The figures indicate explosive growth is taking place in the U.S. economy and this has occurred overnight. The explanation of where this growth is coming from or how it has happened is illusive.

Unlike the previous four years, large numbers of jobs were supposedly created last month. Actually that's not exactly the case. The household survey reported 873,000 jobs were created, whereas the business survey reported 114,000 — a typical amount. In previous months, the household survey has actually indicated major job losses. The mainstream media has failed to report this. However, when a number suddenly appears that lacks credibility in the same survey, but that number is positive, it apparently is worth reporting. 

Where did these jobs come from?  It's not clear from the report. It was specifically stated that "manufacturing employment edged down in September". There was a loss of 16,000 jobs, so there is no evidence that U.S. manufacturing is on the upswing. Based on the following statement, 600,000 people were hired part-time last month: "The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) rose from 8.0 million in August to 8.6 million in September". This is a huge change. Where are these part-time workers employed and what were they hired to do? Will they be fired the day after the election?

Perhaps even more amazing is that the BLS reported that the U.S. labor force grew in September 2012 for the first time in years. From August 2007 to August 2012, the U.S. labor force shrank like it would during a depression with a total 9,602,000 people leaving it. It abruptly increased by 418,000 last month. What caused such a large number of people to suddenly influx into the labor force? GDP last quarter barely grew indicating a stagnant U.S. economy.

The number of unemployed persons, at 12.1 million, supposedly decreased by 456,000 in September. The BLS stated that the unemployment rate fell to 7.8% —  the first time it has been below 8.0% since just after President Obama took office. The continual multi-year unemployment rate of over 8.0% has been a major issue in the presidential election.

The numbers in the September employment report are quite fantastic and there is no basis for believing them. Disreputable statisticians can easily produce highly unreliable numbers. If statistics are inconsistent with the past, with each other, have no traceable explanation or seem contradictory with real world observations, they are suspicious. In the case of the September employment report all four criteria have been met. The quality of U.S. economic numbers have been decaying for the last 30 years. They seem to currently be making the transition from manipulation to outright fantasy.

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment in Long-Term Downtrend

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The August employment report released on September 7th was not particularly good by any measure. While the month to month changes seem lackluster, the longer term picture is truly dismal.

The headline numbers indicated that 96,000 jobs were created in August and that the unemployment rate declined from 8.3% to 8.1%. The previous two months were revised down by 41,000 however. Manufacturing employment was down 15,000 from July. "Food Services and Drinking Places" was the category with the biggest gains, adding 28,000 jobs last month.

Underneath the surface, the picture wasn't mediocre, it was negative. Looking at the total number of people listed as Employed in Table A indicated that 119,000 fewer Americans had jobs in August than in July. This comes from the Household survey and receives little attention from the mainstream media. This number was negative in the July release as well. Why isn't this reported?  Well perhaps the media doesn't trust people to know whether or not they actually have a job.

What happened to employment between July and August though was minor compared to the weakening jobs picture over the last five years. It was in August 2007 that the Fed cut the discount rate, which was the beginning of its attempts to stimulate the economy. By the end of 2008, the Fed's Fund rate was at zero and a number of special programs had been implemented to handle the Credit Crisis. The first quantitative easing program had begun and a second round took place after that. In respect to jobs, the figures indicate that the Fed's efforts have been an utter failure.

In August 2007, 145,794,000 people were employed in the U.S. Last month, five years later, 142,101,000 people had jobs. So after all of the Fed's efforts and all the stimulus programs implemented by the Obama administration, there were 3,693,000 less jobs in the United States.   In his Jackson Hole Speech in August, Fed Chair Ben Bernanke stated the Fed's efforts "increased private payroll employment by more than 2 million jobs". Oh really?  Why don't those jobs show up in the government's own statistics Mr. Bernanke?

What caused the unemployment rate to be reported as lower in August than in July was a decline in the labor force. It shrank by 368,000. This is only a continuation of a multi-year trend though. In August 2007 there were 79,319,000 people not in the U.S. labor force. By last month, 88,921,000 didn't have jobs. That's an increase of 9,602,000 in five years. Yet, at the same time the employable population has grown substantially.

What about during just the Obama administration? His employment record is a big issue in the current presidential election after all. The labor force population has increased from 234,552,000 to 243,555,000 or by 9,003,000 so far during Obama's term. The current participation rate of 63.5% (low for the last few decades) would indicate that approximately 5,717,000 jobs should have been created to keep employment at a steady state. When Obama took office in January 2009, 142,099,000 Americans were employed. As of August 2012, 142,101,000 Americans were employed. There was a net increase of only 2,000 jobs. This represents a huge relative loss since the U.S. needed 5.7 million jobs just to maintain the same level of employment. More jobs would have been needed to make things better.

At his Jackson Hole speech Bernanke stated how concerned he was at the unemployment problem in the United States and that the Fed was willing to do more. Considering how little impact the Fed's high risk money-printing policies have had and how little seems to have resulted from the numerous stimulus programs that have been implemented, there is no reason to believe either will be improving the economy in the future. They are good for juicing stock prices however — at least in the short term. In the long run the gains will prove to be illusory.

Sources for the above from Table A of the August 2007,  January 2009 and August 2012 Employment Situation report from the BLS. The URLs for the websites are:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/history/empsit_09072007.txt
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.htm
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm


Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

July Jobs Report Shows U.S. Economic Statistics Are a Joke

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the Labor Department, the U.S. added 163,000 jobs in July. Also according to the Labor Department, the U.S. lost 195,000 jobs in July. So the U.S. economy is either doing OK or it's falling apart big time. Or maybe something between the two is happening. Confused? You should be.

Two separate surveys are used for the employment report. In one, they ask businesses about the amount of hiring they've done in the previous month and in the other the ask people whether or not they have a job. The amount of jobs created for the month is determined by the business survey and the unemployment rate from the survey of households. As more than one article on the July employment report pointed out today, "economists say the business survey is more reliable". So if you think you're unemployed, but an economist says you have a job, the economist is right.

The unemployment rate ticked up to 8.3% according to the household data.  The two surveys have frequently not seemed to match in the past with minimal job gains resulting in drops in the unemployment rate. The Labor Department explained that this occurred because millions of people have left the U.S. labor force since the "recovery" began in 2009 (150,000 more left in July). Even though these people are unemployed, they are not counted as unemployed and this makes the unemployment rate look better. Why millions of people would stop looking for work during a "recovery" has never been answered. Usually, this type of behavior takes place during depressions.

The Labor Department did not discuss the massive discrepancy between its two employment surveys in its press release. Instead it gave a rosy assessment of all the jobs created last month. This included 25,000 new jobs in manufacturing, even though the recent ISM Manufacturing report (a private survey) indicated U.S. manufacturing activity shrank last month.  So an industry that is losing business is hiring lots of new workers. That certainly makes a lot of sense all right.

One possible explanation for the discrepancy was that "inappropriate" statistical adjustments were made to the numbers in the business survey. While one should never rule out gross incompetence when discussing the output of the government statistical offices, a more cynical person might think that there was a purposeful effort to produce better numbers than actually exist because it's an election year. After all, those pesky downward revisions months later never get any notice from the press and the ugly truth can always be told later when no one is paying attention (and after they've voted).

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

April 2012 Jobs, Labor Force Continues to Drop

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The BLS release the employment situation for April 2012 this morning. The report showed that 115,000 jobs were created last month and the current unemployment rate is 8.1%. The big story however was the incredible number of people leaving the U.S. labor force  — almost ten million in the last five years.

Looking at any of the macro numbers since the Great Recession began in December 2007 indicates that the employment situation in the United States is severely challenged. People are leaving the labor force in droves. The participation rate continues to fall as well. This does not happen during economic recoveries. It happens during recessions and depressions. Not only have these numbers trended in the wrong direction since the "recovery" supposedly began in mid-2009, but there has been an acceleration.

These trends are hidden because large numbers of people enter the labor force because of school graduation and immigration. When balanced against the number of people retiring, the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 new jobs every month to keep the employment situation steady. It has rarely met or exceeded this number in the last four years, yet the unemployment rate reported by the BLS has declined significantly. This can only happen because large numbers of people have left the labor force (a sign of economic stress).

According to Table A of the BLS employment reports, there were 78,711,000 Americans not in the labor force in April 2007. In April 2008, four months after the Great Recession began, this number had risen to 79,241,000. In April 2009 just before the supposed recovery started, 80,554,000 Americans were not in the labor force.  This loss of less than two million during a recession isn't surprising . What is surprising is what happened during the recovery.

After almost a year of recovery, the number of people not in the labor force grew to 82,614,000. This was an increase of more than two million, a number greater than the loss during the previous two years that included the recession. Then in April 2011 after another year of recovery, 85,726,000 Americans were not in the U.S. labor force — an increase of over three million in only one year. Now in April 2012, 88,419,000 were not in the labor force. This was an increase of almost three million in one year.

In the five years since April 2007, 9,708,000 Americans have left the U.S. labor force. During this period the labor force should have grown approximately 9,000,000 (60 times 150,000). The picture these numbers present are one of an economy in severe decline. Don't expect to hear this from the U.S. government however. Politicians don't get reelected by reporting bad news.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Only Suprise for March Employment Was that it Wasn't Even Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the BLS, the U.S. created only 120,000 non-farm jobs in March. The mainstream media cited this figure as a surprise because it was well below expectations. The real surprise was that the number wasn't even worse.

Winter month employment numbers came in at the 200,000 level and this was trumpeted as evidence that the economy was finally gaining steam. There were two problems will this line of reasoning. The first is that the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month for the unemployment rate to stay even (this balances the loss of people retiring with new students and legal immigrants entering the job market).  In order to put any serious dent in the massive amount of unemployment that exists the monthly number of jobs being created needs to be well over 200,000. The second problem was the unusually warm weather during the winter that magnified the impact of the seasonal adjustments.

If seasonal adjustments boosted the numbers in January and February, then lower numbers should be expected in the normally warmer spring months. The weak March number seems to be bearing this out. It is interesting to note that the Retail Trade category lost 34,000 jobs in March. This does not support the idea that retail sales have actually been strong as has been claimed, but that the numbers have instead been artificially boosted by inflation. Retail employment is prone to large swings due to seasonal factors.

The official unemployment rate fell to 8.2% from 8.3%. The obvious question is how can this happen if less than 150,000 jobs were created and that's the amount needed for things to remain in equilibrium? It can only occur if more people than expected leave the labor market. This happened again last month  as has been the case during the entire economic "recovery"(millions of people have left the U.S labor market since the Great Recession began). The mass exodus from the labor market creates a huge reservoir of unemployed waiting to reenter the market if conditions actually improve. This reentry could keep the unemployment rate from falling well into the decade.

People of course do not leave the labor market in droves when the economy is on an upswing. The continued shrinkage of the labor market indicates an economic downturn. Don't expect to hear that from either the U.S. government or the cheerleading mainstream media. Politicians don't get reelected by telling the public bad news.

A key question that usually goes unexamined in reporting about the jobs numbers is the high price the U.S. taxpayer and consumer will be paying in the future for the jobs being created today. The U.S. has run deficits of $1.3 trillion or more since 2009. Pumping all of that money into the economy will of course create jobs, but at what cost?  Unless there is a free lunch, that money will have to be paid back either through higher taxes or higher inflation. Both will lead to lower job creation in the coming years.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Non-farmPayrolls -- The Statistical Illusion of Jobs

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Employment Report for December 2011 was released today with a glowing press release from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics).  The highlight of the report was the 42,000 courier and messengers jobs created last month and the claim that the unemployment rate fell to 8.5%

Statistics can easily be manipulated and it is not unknown for political regimes to do so in order to hold on to power (and 2012 is an election year in the U.S.). After all, it is much easier to change a number than to fix the underlying problem the number represents. Fortunately, the BLS publishes a number of statistical Tables with each monthly report that can be used to check its calculations.

When the Great Recession began in December 2007, the civilian non-institutional population of the United States was 189,993,000. At that time, the number of people in the U.S. labor force was 125,588,000. As of December 2011, the BLS states that the employment population ratio for the U.S. is 58.5% (0.585). The non-institutional population of the U.S. was reported at 193,682,000 or 3,689,000 higher than it was in December 2007. The labor force in December 2007 was 125,334,000 and multiplying the increase in the U.S. population in the intervening four years by the employment population ratio indicates that the labor force should have increased by 2,158,000 to 127,492,000.  However, the BLS reports the U.S. labor force last month was 124,114,000. More than three million people are missing from its figures.

The smaller the labor force is, the better the headline unemployment rate becomes. The BLS claims these three million plus people left the labor force and this justifies purging them from the statistics. There is a problem with their line of reasoning however. Large numbers of people only leave a labor force during periods of severe economic distress.  It does not happen during economic recovery. It does not indicate an employment situation that is improving.  Yet, the BLS produces numbers showing things are getting better when this happens. This violates the first rule of statistics -- the results must reflect reality. The BLS numbers do not.

Dividing the number of employed in December 2011 by the size of the labor force that should exist based on the population numbers produces an unemployment rate of 9.6%, not 8.5%. This is the headline number that should be reported. If the BLS wants to insist however that more than three million people have indeed left the labor force (and this has continued in the last year -- the size of the labor force in December 2011 is smaller than it was in December 2010), it should also make it clear that this indicates that there has been an ongoing recession and no economic recovery has taken place. Both can't happen at the same time, except for a brief period. Either the economic recovery story is a lie or there hasn't been a shrinking labor force. 

While mainstream economists will insist that employment is a lagging indicator (more than two years is some lag), this has only been the case in the U.S. years after statistical "improvements" were introduced in the 1980s and 1990s in how government economic numbers were determined. Before that, employment recovered with improving GDP as should be the case. If you think about it, the term jobless recovery makes as much sense as tall midget or genius moron.

The improvement in the weekly unemployment claims is also being cited as evidence of an improving jobs picture. It would be more accurate to say that it is evidence of a jobs picture than can't continue to get worse. As I have stated since at least mid-2010, the weekly claims number will regress toward the mean (move to its long-term average) because eventually there will be few workers who remain to be laid off. After being elevated for several years, the only way that weekly claims  can now increase is with a big jump in bankruptcies. This will be avoided as long as the economy holds steady.

What is keeping the U.S. economy from getting worse is the unprecedented budget deficits that the U.S. is running. If you spend an extra $1.3 trillion dollars that you don't have as the U.S. did in 2011, this will certainly stimulate the economy in the short-term since much of this money winds up in consumer pockets and they spend it.  According to the non-farm payrolls report for December, the U.S. is not exactly getting good value for this money. Unless of course, you think low-paying courier and messenger jobs should be the cornerstone of the economy.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
 Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There is more fantasy in the U.S. employment numbers than in a Harry Potter novel. According to the BLS, the U.S. added 120,000 jobs in November 2011 and the unemployment rate fell by 0.4%. This is not possible.

The U.S. economy needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady based on new entrants into the labor force (the oft cited 200,000 figure is based on past conditions that are no longer applicable). According to official sources, the U.S. added 131,000 jobs a month in 2011. This is better than in previous years, but still not enough to reduce the unemployment rate. Yet, the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims the unemployment rate is dropping and fell from 9.0% to 8.6% in November. How is this possible?

Well, first of all, it isn't. These numbers were created — and "created" is a very appropriate word in this case — by claiming that large numbers of workers left the U.S. labor force. At the same time, the U.S. government has stated that an economic recovery has takien place. A country's labor force does not shrink during recoveries, it grows. This has not happened during the current U.S. "recovery".

The U.S. labor force had approximately six million fewer workers in November 2011 than it did in November 2007. Four years ago, 146,793,000 people were employed in the U.S. In November 2011, only 140,987,000 had jobs. This makes no sense if a recovery has taken place. It does make sense however if there is an ongoing recession and government statisticians have decided to massage the numbers for political reasons.

On the flip side, there were 79,069,00 people not in the labor force in November 2007 and today that number is 86,757,000 — almost eight million greater. The labor force of the U.S. should not be shrinking because the number of students and immigrants looking for jobs exceeds the number of people retiring. People do leave the labor force though if they have determined that there simply are no jobs to be found. The recent Consumer Confidence survey from the Conference Board indicated that less than 6% of Americans thought jobs were currently plentiful. 

In November 2011 alone, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force dropped by almost a net 600,000. This helped reduce the reported unemployment rate to 8.6%. This form of statistical manipulation is something that might be expected in a corrupt third-world backwater. Apparently, this is the standard that Washington is now adhearing to for its statistical reporting. 

 
Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any securi

Is October's Unemployment Rate Really 12.7%?

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The BLS released its non-farm payroll figures for October today and they stated that 80,000 jobs were created and that the U.S. unemployment rate was 9.0%. There are reasons to believe that this number is actually as high as 12.7%.

Except for February and March of this year, the unemployment rate (the U-3 number) has been 9.0% or higher since May 2009. It hasn't risen well into the double digits because large numbers of workers have supposedly left the labor force and these people are not counted as unemployed. If we go back four years to just before the Great Recession began, we find that in October 2007 there were 145,937,000 employed Americans over 16 and 79,506,000 were not in the labor force. Now in October 2011, there are 140,302,000 employed people and 86,071,000 not in the labor force. You can see the figures here: http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab1.htm.

So in the last four years the American economy has had a net loss of 5,635,000 jobs. This huge loss hasn't shown up in an escalating unemployment rate because at the same time a net 6,565,000 people have supposedly left the labor force. The BLS conveniently does not count them as unemployed even though they do not have jobs. If we included them in the unemployment calculations, the unemployment rate for October would be 12.7%. This should not be confused with the underemployment rate (known as U-6) which includes people working part-time, but who want full-time jobs. This number was 16.2% last month.

A case could be made that the U.S. labor force should be shrinking because more people are retiring than there are graduating students. There are approximately 3.5 million people reaching age 65 (not all of whom retire and many of whom didn't work) and only about 3.2 million students graduating high school currently (eventually most of them enter the labor force). While retirees have the advantage, there are also approximately a net 1.3 million immigrants coming into the U.S. every year and a disproportionate number of them are younger adults of employment age. The labor force should at least be steady, if not growing slowly. Instead, BLS figures indicate a rapid shrinkage is taking place.

It would be highly unusual for the labor force to decline at all during a recovery. When the economy is strong, people on the margins go out looking for jobs. For the labor force to drop by millions indicates an extremely weak economy.  So, if the U.S. labor force has six and a half million fewer workers than it did four years ago, no significant recovery has taken place. If the labor force hasn't dropped by as much as the BLS claims, then the unemployment rate is in the double digits and this also indicates no significant recovery has taken place. While it seems more likely than the true unemployment rate is closer to 13% than 9%, either figure indicates that the U.S. economy is still recessionary.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Still at Recession Levels in September

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The non-farm payrolls report for September indicated the U.S. economy added 103,000 jobs last month. Mainstream media immediately jumped on the number as proof the U.S. is not in a recession. It indicates no such thing.

While it seems reasonable to assume that employment can't increase at the begging of a recession, this did not happen in December 2007 when the Great Recession began. Total U.S. non-farm payroll employment actually peaked in January 2008 at 137,996,000. It then declined until hitting a low point of 129,246,000 in February 2010, many months after the recession supposedly bottomed in June 2009. Total employment in September 2011 was only 131,334,000, not even remotely close to levels four years earlier. These figures can be viewed at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/PAYEMS.txt.

The internals of the employment situation for September were not encouraging either. In their press release, the BLS admitted right up front that the end of a strike by the Communication Workers union added 45,000 jobs to the 103,000 total. This leaves only 58,000 jobs being created during the month. More than that amount came from only two sources -- health care and construction. The largest increase in jobs was 41,000 and they were created in the "health care and social assistance" category. Like education, many of these jobs are funded by the government either directly or indirectly, yet they are counted as private sector jobs. The government promulgates this fantasy and the mainstream media mindlessly repeats it.

Another 26,000 jobs somehow came from construction. At least the BLS didn't claim they came from the struggling residential real estate market. Almost all of these new jobs came from the heavy and civil construction category. Perhaps the federal government is building another Hoover Dam and forgot to mention it to the public? This is sort of an eyebrow raising number to say the least.

So in September 2011, there were 6,649,000 less employed people in the U.S. than when the Great Recession began in 2007. This is after over two years of supposed recovery. Based on the recent net increases in the labor force, the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 new jobs a month for the employment situation to just hold steady. To reduce the official unemployment rate of 9.1% would require adding a much larger number of jobs every month. This is not happening. As for whether or not the U.S. is in a recession, an unemployment rate of 9.1% has always indicated a recession in the past. Is there any reason to think "things are different" this time around?

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Recovery Goes Jobless in August

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

More evidence that the U.S. economy is grinding to halt was provided by the August non-farm payroll numbers today. According to the BLS (the Bureau of Labor Statistics), the U.S. economy produced no additional jobs in August, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 9.1%, and average hourly earnings declined. The June and July numbers were revised downward with 58,000 less jobs than originally reported.

Almost every category lost jobs in August except for health care and social assistance, professional and business services, and mining and logging. Health care and social assistance added 30,000 jobs. This category was the one perennial gainer during the Great Recession and its aftermath. Even though many of these jobs are government related, they are classified as private sector by the BLS. Professional and business services added 28,000 jobs. A footnote in the report states that this number includes jobs from other unspecified categories (could those be government jobs that are included to make it look like private sector employment is better than it actually is?).  Mining and logging added another 6,000 jobs.

Year over year comparisons were even more dismal than the monthly numbers suggested. There were only 400,000 more people employed in the U.S. this August compared to August 2010 (see Household Data, Summary Table A on the BLS website for the details). This is the actual net number of new jobs created in the last year. This has averaged 33,000 a month. At the same time, the non-institutionalized civilian population has been growing at almost 150,000 per month. Yet, during this time period, the unemployment rate fell from 9.6% to 9.1%.  This has happened not because a lot of jobs were created, but because approximately 2.3 million people left the labor force.

Despite close to zero percent interest rates and the trillions of dollars of stimulus thrown at it, the U.S. economy seems incapable of producing jobs. The only thing that has prevented the reported unemployment rate from rising into the double digits is the large numbers of people exiting the labor force (they are not counted as unemployed). This doesn't happen when a real economic recovery takes place. People rush into the labor force as jobs become more plentiful. Unemployment rates also don't remain at the 9% level if the economy is doing well as has constantly been reported. Mainstream press claims to the contrary,  a "jobless recovery" just doesn't exist in the real world (nor are there tall midgets or thin obese people). Based on the jobs numbers, investors should assume that the U.S. has been in a chronic state of recession and chronic stimulus is needed to keep things from getting worse.   

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
 

September Jobs Report Indicates Economy Dead in the Water

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


September was the 15th month with the U.S. unemployment rate was at or above 9.5%.  The underemployment rate, which includes forced part-time and some discouraged workers, rose to 17.1%. While the Great Recession supposedly ended in June 2009, well over a year later the employment figures have still failed to show any significant improvement.

Private sector hiring was tepid to say the least in September. While the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims that there were 64,000 private sector jobs added last month, only two categories dominated hiring - 'leisure and hospitality' and 'health care and social services'. Leisure and hospitality, which includes drinking establishments, added 38,000 jobs. It is perfectly understandable why people would want to drink more considering the state of the economy.  Health care and social services (the mainstream media always leaves out the social services part), which is the only category that continually added jobs during the recession, added 32,000 jobs. Why social service jobs are counted as private sector jobs is a of course a mystery known only to the BLS. Education jobs are also counted as private sector, even though most of them are paid for with taxpayer money. Many health care jobs are of course also government funded.

Government jobs actually counted as government jobs dropped 159,000 in September. Almost half of this was accounted for by a loss of 77,000 Census positions. Considering the Census was supposedly finished months ago, this leads to the obvious question: What have these people been doing since then? Another 76,000 jobs were lost by local government. The Obama administration's February 2009 stimulus package provided a lot of funding for localities to pay for police, fireman and teachers. This funding seems to already be running out. What will happen in 2011, when the stimulus money has been completely spent?

The economic establishment has told us that the U.S. economy has had four quarters of recovery so far and we have already in the fifth. Employment hasn't shown any recovery however. Up to now, the claim have been that this is because employment is a lagging indicator (something that only showed up in the 1990s after a number of 'adjustments' had been made to how GDP and the inflation figures were calculated). The employment lag has already been several quarters and it now looks like it is heading for several years.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

More Predictable Changes in Weekly Unemployment Claims

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Weekly unemployment claims increased to 465,000 last week rising by 12,000. The number was above analyst expectations, although it shouldn't have been.

Weekly unemployment claims almost always have a significant drop around major holidays and then rise afterwards. This happened right on schedule for the Labor Day weekend. The last major drop was around the July 4th weekend. It was reported today that the four-week moving average is now the best since late July. Somehow, mainstream media reports failed to mention the reason for this was because both periods contained major holidays.  The major reason for the holiday drops is that the bureaucrats responsible for processing the claims and reporting the numbers seem to take longer vacations than anyone else. Nine states were missing data for the week before Labor Day, so the numbers had to be 'estimated'. For some reason, this very important piece of information didn't appear in press reports either.

What the press did report was that weekly unemployment claims were suddenly improving and this was evidence the economy wasn't falling into another recession. This was an amazing analysis considering a claims number under 400,000 would be needed to justify that statement and the best number around Labor Day wasn't even below 450,000. Furthermore even the most casual examination of the claims data shows that claims have been consistently in the 450,000 to 500,000 range all year. So instead of reporting "Not Much Changes in Employment Picture" or "Weekly Claims Improve As Usual Because of Holiday", the press fell all over itself to report a big improvement in the U.S. employment picture. The only thing they left out was cheerleaders in the background and audio that intermittently said 'rah, rah, rah'. Stocks rallied strongly on the surprising news that seemed to indicate a strengthening economy.

Maybe the mainstream media had already pre-written their articles about the 'recovery summer' that the administration had promised and didn't want to waste good copy. As for the recovery summer, there was essentially no change in weekly unemployment claims, or in the overall unemployment rate. Claims are somewhat better now though than they were a year ago when they came in at 538,000. It took around $1.5 trillion of on-the-books deficit spending to achieve the improvement to 465,000. Apparently a trillion dollars of borrowed money just doesn't go as far as it used to.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

BLS Press Release MisReports August Jobs Data

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to the August jobs report, the U.S. lost another 54,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate rose to 9.6%. The government claimed that the private sector added 67,000 jobs, although most of these jobs came from the Health Care and Social Assistance category and from Education, both of which are filled with jobs supported by the government. The numbers in the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) press release did not agree with the Data Tables and of course made things look better than they actually were.
      
The data in the non-farm payrolls report indicated that there were 40,200 jobs created in the Health Care and Social Assistance category (the mainstream media almost always leaves off the Social Assistance part, perhaps because these are so obviously government and not private sector jobs). Interestingly the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) press release only admitted to 28,000 jobs and this incorrect number was picked up in every mainstream media article. The BLS press release, which can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf, stated "Employment in health care increased by 28,000 in August, with the largest gains occurring in ambulatory health care services (+17,000) and hospitals (+9,000)".  The Establishment Data Seasonally Adjusted (Table B in the report), which can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.b.htm, stated that the number of jobs in Health Care and Social Assistance increased by 40,200.

The Goods Producing Sector, which actually does include mostly private sector jobs (nationalized companies like General Motors being the exception), was dead in the water in August. The total number of jobs added was ZERO. Goods producing industries include Manufacturing, Mining and Logging, and Construction. Manufacturing lost 27,000 jobs and this contradicts the rosy picture painted by the ISM manufacturing report from two days ago that indicated U.S. manufacturing employment was skyrocketing. Construction kept the Goods Producing Sector from being negative by adding 19,000 jobs. This occurred even though new home sales recently fell to the lowest number ever recorded. Perhaps these workers are busy building castles (or more appropriately, McMansions) in the sky, so of course their work isn't immediately visible to ordinary mortals such as ourselves.

There is no evidence in the August payroll numbers of any significant non-government related hiring taking place. The first job loss number was reported three years ago in August 2007 and after over $3 trillion in deficit spending since then, the U.S. employment situation has managed to only reach a state of controlled bleeding. There were an estimated 6.6 million students graduating from school this year and eventually most of them will need a job. That implies the U.S. needs 550,000 new jobs a month to absorb former students into the labor force. People are of course always leaving the labor force as well because of retirement and for other reasons such as giving up looking for a job because none are available. It has been generally accepted for a long time that the U.S. must add at least 200,000 jobs a month to just accommodate new people looking for work.  Even after getting to that level, and we are still losing jobs not gaining them, there is then an additional 8 million jobs that have to be created to replace those lost during the Credit Crisis. So far, it's just not happening.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Less Credit and Income = More Consumer Spending?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


As of June, consumer borrowing has now dropped 16 out of the last 17 months. Credit Card debt has fallen 21 months in a row. The personal savings rate in June rose to 6.4% from 2.1% before the recession began. Wages and Salaries are down 3.6% in the last two and half years. Despite decreased credit and income and increased savings, all three of which are negatives for consumer spending, GDP figures claim American consumers are buying more.

U.S. GDP growth has been fueled by consumer borrowing for many years. Consumer credit grew faster than GDP before the Credit Crisis hit, but is now moving in reverse.  June 2010 total credit card debt (revolving credit) has now fallen below the November 2005 level. American consumers over the decades have accumulated far too much debt and deleveraging is a trend that is likely to go on for many years. This is certainly a negative for an economy that has been built on consumer spending. Even with consumer credit staying steady, it would be hard for the GDP to rise.

The reduction in consumer borrowing is not a voluntary process. The big banks are cutting credit limits, cancelling cards and demanding pay downs. Consumers are choosing to save more though. The savings rate was only 2.1% in 2007. Then it was 4.1% in 2008 and 5.9% in 2009. It was 6.0% or over each month of the second quarter of 2010. More savings means less consumer spending and this trend is likely to continue as long as consumers feel insecure about the economy.

According to the BEA (Bureau of Economic Analysis), wages and salaries of U.S. workers have declined only 3.6% since the first quarter of 2008. This small drop is really surprising considering the unemployment rate was 5.0% in December 2007 and was 9.5% in July 2010. More government jobs and government subsidized jobs prevented this number from being much worse.

Even more amazing, total personal income actually increased by 1.5% during this time. How is this possible during a recession?  Examining the figures indicates that there was a 27% increase in 'Government Social Benefits to Persons' in the last nine quarters. These various forms of stimulus payments, which are essentially welfare, along with government subsidized employment, were paid for by the approximately $3.5 trillion in deficit spending in 2008, 2009, and 2010. This has been the major source of funds for consumer spending recently.

So even though consumers have been borrowing less, the government has been borrowing more and giving the money to consumers to spend (or at least to some consumers). This is equivalent to the 'bread and circus' of Roman times. It is not a sustainable model for economic growth. Nor is it even honest to claim that this is actually economic growth. We don't exactly live in an age of financial honesty however - and that is another trend that can be expected to continue.

Some of the data for this article can be found at: http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.aspSelectedTable=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010).

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

July Payroll Report Marks 3 Years of Job Losses

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. lost 131,000 thousand jobs in July. It has now been three years since the first job losses appeared in August 2007. Despite over three trillion dollars in government deficit spending since then, the employment situation has yet to turn around.

While job losses date back to August 2007, they didn't become consistent until 2008 and 2009.  Every month in that two-year period, except November 2009 had a decline in payrolls. Job gains were reported between January and May 2010, with payrolls increasing over 200,000 in March, April and May. The U.S. economy needs to add 200,000 jobs a month just to stay even because of new entrants into the labor force (recently the mainstream media has downgraded this long accepted number to 100,000 in an effort to make things look better). Unfortunately, most of those jobs added in the spring were part-time temporary Census positions and now those people are being fired, so job losses have returned. There was a loss of 221,000 jobs in June - revised downward from the originally reported loss of 125,000.

The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) reported this month that the private sector added 71,000 jobs. Only three sectors accounted for most of these 'gains' - Health Care, Motor Vehicles, and Transportation and Warehousing. Health care and Social Assistance added 27,000 jobs. Health care has been the only sector to continually add jobs during the downturn. Government and Education were the other two categories that frequently added jobs. Education and Health Care jobs mostly come from the government or are paid through government programs and should not be considered private sector. Motor Vehicles gained 21,000 jobs through the magic of seasonal adjustments, not by actually hiring more workers. Transportation and Warehousing added 12,000 jobs.

The headline unemployment rate (U-3) for July was reported as 9.5%. This compares to 4.6% rate in August 2007. Including forced part-time workers and some discouraged workers (U-6), sometimes referred to as the underemployment rate, the July 2010 rate was 16.5%. The reported unemployment rate would have been much worse if close to a million people didn't supposedly leave the U.S. labor force in May and June of this year. This was a truly amazing finding considering as many as 6.6 million American students graduated from high school and college in those two months. While all of them didn't enter the labor force, most of them that did were without jobs when they graduated. Where are they in the statistics?

The U.S. labor situation began to deteriorate three years ago. Since that time, trillions were spent in bailouts, there has been approximately $3.5 trillion in federal deficit spending, and the Fed has kept interest rates as zero percent starting in December 2008. The public was promised over and over again that each program would make things better. The stock market has rallied on that good news over and over again. Empty promises and fantasy statistics will only work for so long however. At some point we will find out for just how long.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

June Employment Report: Where are the Graduating Students?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Every May and June millions of students graduate from high school and college and enter the U.S. labor force swelling the numbers. Yet in the just released employment report for June, the BLS claimed the labor force decreased by 652,000 last month. This followed a decrease of 286,000 in May. This of course is not possible unless the U.S. economy is in the midst of a depression.

So where did the all the recent graduates go? One place most of them didn't go was to a place of employment. A survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers found only 40% of new college graduates had a job offer before leaving school in 2010. This compares to two-thirds in pre-recession 2007.  High school graduates not going to college probably didn't do much better. The BLS lists the unemployment rate for those between 16 and 19 as 25.7%.

According to the Statistical Abstract of the United States, 3.3 million students graduated high school and another 3.3 million received college degrees in 2010. While not all of these people would have entered the labor force, it can be assumed that at least a few million did in the last two months. Nevertheless, the BLS claims that there were almost a million less people in the U.S. labor force in June than there were in April. This huge drop in participants caused the reported unemployment rate to drop to 9.5% in June since people who leave the labor force aren't counted as unemployed. The Bureau explained these disappearing participants as people who gave up looking for jobs because none were available for them - not exactly an indication of a recovering job market.

BLS figures further show that there were 301,000 less employed Americans in June than there were in May (see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm). The headline number reported a loss of only 125,000 jobs however. The BLS explained this away as a loss of 225,000 census jobs and claimed that the private sector added 83,000 jobs. If you use the 301,000 figure though, it looks like there was a loss of approximately 83,000 private sector jobs.

The insane contradictions in the BLS figures can partially be explained by 'seasonal adjustments'. This is one of the statistical tricks the bureau utilizes to try to make a sow's ear look like a silk purse. Seasonal adjustments make it possible for millions of graduating students to enter the labor force and the BLS to report that the labor force shrank while this was happening.

The employment numbers should be seen for what they are - absurd results created by gross manipulation. Many people however don't wish to believe this takes place despite all the evidence. Those are the people who really need to worry about the current state of the U.S. economy. If the labor force can decline by a million when millions or graduating students are entering it, this means it really lost maybe four or five million workers in a two-month period. That indicates that things are worse in the U.S. now than they were during the Great Depression in the 1930s.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Good News, Bad News Jobs Report

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


There was something for both bulls and bears in the April employment report. The government stated that 290,000 jobs were created last month, a solid enough number. Despite these job gains, the headline unemployment rate rose to 9.9%. If certain discouraged workers and forced part-timers were added, the unemployment rate would have been an incredibly high 17.1%.

It is of course puzzling that the unemployment rate can go up from 9.7% to 9.9% while the U.S. economy is supposedly adding 290,000 jobs. The mystery is solved according to the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) by noting that 805,000 jobseekers reentered the labor market in April. Interestingly, a similar number of workers left the U.S. labor market in a one-month period between December 2009 and January 2010. Perhaps the BLS just misplaced them for four months and finally found them again? Labor force participation is one of the areas where it is easiest to fudge the numbers to make the employment statistics look better.

Seasonal 'adjustments' can also improve the numbers quite a bit as well. The economy usually adds jobs at this time of year and they are appearing right on schedule in the employment report. For an example of how seasonal adjustment works, note the employment numbers in the education category in June. There is generally a 20% reduction in education employment once the school year ends. You will see no such drop in the employment report. The BLS should perhaps give the seasonal adjustment term another name, such as 'make-believe adjustment' for instance, so the public can have better insight into how the employment numbers are created.

The BLS did at least admit that the government hired 66,000 temporary workers in April to help conduct the census. Census hiring has been going on since March 2009 and should have peaked in the last two months. Sources estimate total census-hiring in the range of 1.2 million. I have not found anything near this amount added to the government category in previous reports. However, temporary workers in the Business and Professional category have ballooned during the census hiring period. A footnote in the employment report indicates that jobs added in 'other' categories may be included in the Business and Professional category. We will have to see what happens there in a few months when almost all of the 1.2 million census workers are no longer employed.

To see if the job situation is actually improving, it is always a good idea to compare year over year figures. According to the BLS, the number of people 'not in the labor force' is over two million higher in April 2010 than it was in April 2009. This increase reduces the reported unemployment rate. The employment to population ratio is more than a percent lower today than a year earlier. The worse comparison though is for long-term unemployment (27 weeks or over). This number has grown considerably and is on its way to doubling. A year ago there were 3.7 million long-term unemployed and last month there were 6.7 million. This indicates that the unemployment rate is not just high, but a significant number of the unemployed are having trouble getting new jobs - and this will continue to be the case.

According to recent polls, just 21% of Americans consider the economy to be in good condition. The view of the average person is very different from the numbers produced by the statisticians in Washington. Even with the job increases that took place in April, there are approximately 1.5 million less people employed in the U.S. today than one year ago. When the $800 billion stimulus bill was passed in February 2009, the Obama administration claimed it would create 3.5 million additional jobs. There seems to be some inconsistency between the hype and what has actually taken place. Is it any wonder that the American people don't trust the numbers coming out of Washington?

Disclosure: None relevant.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

March Employment Numbers Better Thanks to Government Hiring

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to the latest government statistics, U.S. nonfarm payrolls increased by 162,000 in March. The headline unemployment rate was still 9.7% as was the case in January and February. The alternative unemployment rate ticked up to 16.9% however. Most hiring took place thanks to the Census, the health care industry, and the magic of seasonal adjustments - none of which indicate a recovering economy.

The U.S. census has really been the key to the better (or more accurately less awful) employment numbers for the last several months. According to the recent payroll report, the U.S. government hired 48,000 census workers in March. Hiring has been going on for approximately a year now, but has only been substantial since last fall. The Financial Times of London has reported that the government will be hiring 1.2 million workers for the 2010 Census - twice as many as were needed for the 2000 Census (think of this as a form of hidden government economic stimulus). Only a small fraction of this number has shown up in the employment figures so far, unless the hiring is being hidden in the Business and Professional category. There appears to have been about 50,000 extra temporary workers showing up there every month since last fall. A footnote indicates that this number may include workers from 'other' categories - one possibility for 'other' would be government.

The seriousness of the unemployment picture and how bad the economy actually is can be seen in the number of long-term unemployed (those without jobs for more than six months). This number increased by 414,000 in March to 6.5 million. Of the unemployed, 44.1% are now long-term unemployed. This number is much worse than in any other recession in entire post-War period. Another 9.1 million people are working part-time because they can't get full-time employment. Another 2.3 million workers are considered marginally attached to the labor force and not counted as unemployed because they didn't look for work in the last four weeks, but did do so during the last year.

So what made the 162,000 job gains possible in March? In addition to 48,000 jobs officially listed from the census, there were another 40,000 temporary help service jobs. Health care was the next biggest gainer with 37,000 jobs. Health care has been the only industry to consistently add jobs since the recession began in December 2007. It is not an economically sensitive industry. Leisure and hospitality added another 22,000 jobs, manufacturing 17,000 and construction 15,000. Seasonal adjustments, the government statistician's tool for turning a sow's ear into a silk purse, should be considered the source of extra employment in these industries. When I saw the figures, I wondered if the extra construction workers had been hired to build castles in the sky. To be fair, a case could be made that manufacturing and construction are gaining jobs now simply because there couldn't be any more unemployment in the short-term in those industries, both of which have been devastated during the recession.

Despite all the negative aspects to the employment report, including average hourly earnings falling 0.1%, the mainstream media trumpeted it as more evidence that 'happy days are here again' (the title of a song from the Great Depression). Coverage was filled with statements such as, "The increase is the latest sign that the economic recovery is sustainable and healing in the job market is beginning." Government hiring of census workers and more health care jobs (many of which are also government related) does not indicate a sustainable economic recovery. Instead, it indicates sustainable government spending to try to make a recovery look like it is taking place.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

NEXT: Don't Confuse Inflation With Economic Growth

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.