A Twisted Tale of Gold Stolen Almost 80 Years Ago

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Apparently the government can keep property stolen from you, but you can't keep property stolen from the government. A recent Bloomberg Businessweek article entitled "Gold Coins: The Mystery of the Double Eagle" details how the Secret Service has spent almost 80 years trying to track down 1933 Double Eagle $20 gold coins missing from the Philadelphia Mint.  It is well-known however who stole millions of dollars of gold from the American public in the same year - and since it was the U.S. government, lot's of luck in getting compensation.

The 1933 Double Eagle never went into circulation. All coins were ordered to be melted down because U.S. citizens were banned from owning gold in the same year. Moreover, the Roosevelt Administration confiscated all gold and paid gold holders $20.67 per ounce. Those who failed to turn their gold in were subject to a 10 year jail sentence - more time than some violent criminals got - and a $10,000 fine. Once the government had the citizenry's gold, it raised the price to $35.00 an ounce or 41% higher. The price difference represents the value of personal property stolen by the government.

Sensibly, some people sued the federal government claiming the gold seizure was unconstitutional. After all, the U.S. Constitution clearly protects property rights of Americans - if it is enforced that is. Moreover, the Roosevelt Administration claimed it was given authority to seize everyone's gold through a World War I law that gave the government sweeping powers to seize personal property to protect the Republic during wartime. There was of course, no war in 1933.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court, in one of its most absurd rulings of all time, ruled the gold seizure perfectly legal. Even today, the mainstream press continues to soft peddle this trashing of the U.S. Constitution. The Bloomberg Businessweek article states that Roosevelt's Executive Order 6102,  "prohibited the hoarding of gold", rather than the owning of gold. While the gold was taken long ago, the same propaganda from the 1930s seems to still be with us.  

Apparently also in 1933 at least one employee at the Philadelphia Mint smuggled out some Double Gold Eagles. The government was unaware of this however. Around 1937, a Philadelphia coin dealer offered some Double Gold Eagles for sale. One of them, after being purchased by another coin dealer, was sold to King Farouk of Egypt. Unbeknownst to the Secret Service, the Secretary of the Treasury's office issued an export license for this coin on Feb. 29, 1944.

This was only one of many things that took place at Treasury that the Secret Service knew nothing about. Not stated in the Bloomberg Businessweek article was that the Under-Secretary of the Treasury at the time, Harry Dexter White, was the most highly placed Soviet agent in the U.S. government. This inconvenient, but well-documented truth has been covered up or minimized by left-wing historians and reporters for decades. White began working for the Roosevelt Administration in 1934 and concentrated on the relationship of gold and silver to currency management. The U.S. federal government confiscated American's private silver holdings in 1934.

The Secret Service arranged an elaborate sting operation in 1996 to eventually get the Farouk gold coin back. Thank goodness they didn't waste their time investigating Bernie Madoff while he was in the process of ripping off the public in his record breaking $65 billion Ponzi scheme. Eventually, after being seized from a British subject who had bought it, this coin was sold at auction and the proceeds were split between him and the U.S. government. Recently more coins have surfaced in the United States and the government has simply confiscated them -- something it is very good at doing when it comes to gold.

That the U.S. government claims rights through perpetuity and across national borders for its property, but unconstitutionally denies them to its own citizens is the major issue in the Bloomberg Businessweek article (one they seem to have missed entirely), but not the only one. Other than the dangerous precedent of property rights for the average person being trashed, the article brings up the point that the federal government is unaware that gold is stolen from its storehouses and the government wastes its time on pursuing trivial matters on its behalf while ignoring major economic crimes involving billions or even trillions of dollars. Fort Knox hasn't been audited  since 1954. How much of the gold is still there?  What other major Ponzi schemes and frauds are taking place while government agents spend their time tracking down gold coins from 1933?

Disclosure: Do not own any 1933 gold coins.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The CFTC and Manipulation of the Silver Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) will be holding hearings on trading in the precious and base metals on March 25th in its Washington, D.C. offices. Possible manipulation of the silver market is on the agenda. Critics have maintained for years now that a few large banks hold down silver prices by having large concentrations of short positions in the market - and this disadvantages the small trader.

The CFTC has investigated manipulation of the silver market by the big banks before in 2004 and 2008. They found nothing. This should provide little comfort to investors however. The SEC, one of the other major U.S. market regulatory bodies, investigated Bernie Madoff many times over more than a decade and also found nothing. Madoff eventually turned himself in when his $50 billion Ponzi scheme fell apart on its own accord. Madoff had never made any trades in his mega sized scam, so the SEC's examination of his trading records couldn't have been very thorough. Running a simulation of Madoff's claimed trading strategy also would have revealed it didn't work. To invest the money that Madoff held in his fund, it would have been necessary for him to hold more than 100% of some S&P futures contracts, an obvious impossibility. Moreover a whistle blower detailed the Madoff scheme to the SEC years before it demise and large numbers of additional investors were bilked out of their life savings. Yet, the SEC still found nothing amiss. Investors should consider what the Madoff incident indicates about the quality of U.S. market regulation.

Silver futures trading is by no means an even playing field in the United States as is. Small traders can be paid in cash when their positions expire. Delivery of actual metal is guaranteed only for commercial users. This was particularly relevant in the fall of 2008, when the price of silver fell to around $9 an ounce on the futures market. The physical metal wasn't available for anywhere near that price in the open market. Prices of bars and coins were much, much higher. The option of getting silver at the exceptionally low futures price was not open to the little guy however. The CFTC, whose motto is 'Ensuing the Integrity of the Futures and Options Market', sees nothing wrong with this.

Silver has been manipulated in the past of course. The Hunt Brothers were convicted on federal charges in 1988 for trying to corner the market in 1980. At one point they controlled a third of the global supply not held by governments. When silver prices went vertical and got to the $50 level, the CFTC ordered COMEX to halt trading in long silver positions. A market that only allows shorting will of course collapse and this is exactly what happened. Silver prices plummeted.  Rumors at the time alleged that a number of well-connected insiders made fortunes by shorting silver just before the CFTC's action. While the authorities were vigilant in prosecuting traders on the long side of the market, their resolve seems to have been non-existent in looking for misdeeds on the short side. The CFTC mandated halt in silver buying, but not selling, also led to the U.S. government bailing out the Hunt Brothers' lenders with taxpayer money to the tune of $1 billion.

Warren Buffett also bought a large amount of silver around 1997. He purchased 20% of global supply, but took delivery of the physical metal and stored it in a warehouse in England. Buffet bought his silver in the UK markets away from the prying eyes of U.S. regulators, or so he thought. U.S. regulators supposedly called up their UK counterparts to find out who was buying so much silver in the British markets and to try to pressure them to stop it. Buffett proved to be a hard person to stop however.

According to a February 25th Financial Times article, 42% of net short silver positions on COMEX were held by four or fewer traders. A similar level of concentration of short positions has been common for a long time. I wonder how would the CFTC react if this amount of concentration existed on the long side of the market?

To find out more about the CFTC hearing on March 25th, you can email them at: questions@cftc.gov, call them at: 202-418-5000, or see their press release at: http://www.cftc.gov/newsroom/generalpressreleases/2010/pr5782-10.html.


Disclosure: None

NEXT: Past Recessions Provide Insight Into When the Fed Will Raise Rates

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Big Bust on Wall Street

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

It's not everyday that a billionaire hedge fund manager gets busted for insider trading as happened last Friday. This is not because Wall Street isn't permeated with criminal insider trading activity at the very top, but because the SEC has turned a blind eye to it for a long, long time. In a celebrated case from just a few years ago, an SEC employee who tried to investigate a well-known hedge fund manager was promptly fired for his efforts. The SEC has claimed in the past that since hedge funds and big brokers trade continually it isn't possible to prove that they are engaging in insider trading. It was possible this time however because instead of just examining trading records, wiretapping was used.

Wiretapping was first legally permitted in 1928 by a U.S. Supreme Court decision, several years before the SEC was created. Left to its own devices the SEC would probably never have decided to use any law enforcement technology not available to the Amish, but the FBI was involved in this case. The insider trading investigation against Raj Rajaratnam apparently began in 2007. Rajaratnam runs the Galleon Group which has $3 billion under management. He has been charged with conspiracy and securities fraud. Reports indicate that he is at the center of an insider trading ring and more arrests are coming.

Where did Rajaratnam get his inside information? Other than sources that worked directly for the companies involved, Internet sources indicate that Rajaratnam seemed to have at least one informant at the rating agency Moody's, the consulting firm McKinsey & Company, and Intel Capital (the venture capital arm of the technology giant). These are all top firms. You should ask yourself how many other firms have employees involved in providing insider information, how many employees are involved and to how many hedge funds is this information provided? My guess is the answers to these questions is a lot, a lot and a lot. Why aren't there stricter controls within these firms that prevent this from happening? The public has a right to know.

At least some progress is being made in reigning in the Wall Street criminal operations. The biggest Ponzi schemer of all time, Bernie Madoff, is behind bars, not because the SEC caught on to his obvious $50 billion scam after numerous investigations, but because it finally blew up on its own accord. At least the SEC did finally close down the $8 billion 'investment fraud' run by Allen Stanford. The head of a top New York law firm, Marc Drier, has been sentenced to 20 years in jail for fraudulent activity. All of these cases were beyond outrageous and extreme examples of criminality. What about all the other criminal activity on Wall Street that is being done with at least a grain of discretion? Rajaratnam is merely the tip of that very massive iceberg.

NEXT: U.S. Dollar Down, Everything Else Up

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21




This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Natural Gas Deconstructed

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If you think logically, what is happening in the natural gas market will be difficult for you to understand. Markets actually always act rationally however, if you have all the facts available. When they don't seem to be doing so, it is because there is additional information that needs to be considered in order to fully understand what is taking place. In these circumstances you need to think about what could be taking place behind the scenes that could explain what is going on.

The natural gas storage report was released yesterday and it was bullish. Storage went up 52 BCFs and expectations were they would go up 55 BCFs. Natural gas has been declining for the last 11 days and is a heavily shorted market. So did it go up on bullish news? No, it sold off! The near term futures contract closed at $2.95. This in and of itself makes absolutely no sense and defies all rules in how markets operate. Even more surprising is that the cost of production for natural gas in the U.S. is somewhere around $4 to $5 depending on the source. It was already noted two months ago that 50% of U.S. gas wells had already been shut down because of low prices. Production should be close to collapse at this point.

The natural gas futures market is also in extreme contango (distant future prices much higher than the current futures contract), certainly the most extreme of any market in recent history. And the contango is getting even worse. The average price for natural gas futures between November and March is $5.32. Moreover, the oil/natural gas price ratio went over 24 yesterday. It peaked around 22 in 1990. This is also an historical extreme. When something gets way above (or below) its long term average, it invariably reverts back to the mean over time.

So who's making money off of this? This statement, which I found in an article for futures traders explains it all: "Traders on the future market are able to lock in the difference of over $2 per MMBTUs and cover their risk exposure by storing supplies until next winter." This is a particular boon to the large users of natural gas and these are the people profiting handsomely from the seemingly irrational behavior in the market. Furthermore, all of this has been made possible because of the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), the government regulatory body which is supposed to be keeping the markets honest (and is doing as good a job as the proverbial fox guarding the hen house).

The CFTC announced in June they were planning on reigning in speculation in the market and have been holding hearings this summer. They specifically targeted the UNG ETF as a major source of speculation, even though it is a passive investment vehicle that only buys more natural gas futures in response to investor demand. UNG is also an investment vehicle used by small investors. Along with the SEC, which prevented UNG from issuing news shares for awhile and functioning as an ETF should, the CFTC has tried to cripple UNG's operations. This has allowed the big users of the commodity to drive near term natural gas prices to theoretically impossible levels - and make a killing. Like the SEC and its handling of $65 billion Ponzi Schemer Bernie Madoff (who was investigated several times over a many year period, but no dishonest behavior was ever found), the CFTC hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the big players.

As mentioned in yesterday's blog, there is an alternative to UNG. The ETN GAZ also represents the price of natural gas. While UNG lost 50 cents yesterday, GAZ was up 81 cents at one point, although it closed up only 16 cents. The trading volume on GAZ yesterday was enormous reaching almost 17 times the 200-day average. It looked like investors were dumping UNG to buy GAZ, which as an ETN is not affected by the CFTC's investigations. In theory, an ETF and ETN investing in the same commodity should move not only with the commodity, but by the same percentage amount. GAZ actually went up (and by a lot at one point) when natural gas futures were selling off and UNG was down. Just another indication that all rules of reality have temporarily been suspended in the natural gas market.

NEXT: U.S. Dollar, Stocks, Bernanke and Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bonds, Bernanke and Immoral Hazard

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. is auctioning off $235 billion in debt this week, which surpasses the $104 billion record set in a week in late June. There is some concern among the participants that foreign demand may be weak - and it probably will be. That doesn't mean the the paper won't be sold. The U.S. will simply print the money to buy it. But don't worry, the mainstream media will as usual assure us that this won't be inflationary even though it has been every other time throughout history.

'No inflation' has been the mantra of the U.S. monetary authories since 2007. One reason that has been cited for the last few days of the stock rally is Bernanke's testimony before Congress last week that the economic recovery is widening (where this is happening I don't know) and it won't likely include inflation. Bernanke also said that there would be no subprime crisis one month before it blew up. He then proceeded to continually misjudge the extent of the problem and mishandle it over and over again. So of course, he knows what he's doing now.

Bernanke also has a town hall meeting in Kansas City on Sunday night to get in touch with the people and to help further misinform them. He was repeatedly asked about the Fed's 'too big to fail' doctrine. His response was that he had to "hold his nose" to rescue such institutions during this crisis. Fortunately, Bernanke isn't Pinocchio or his arm would have had to reach out to the planet Neptune. The 'too big to fail' doctrine was actually established in the U.S. in the early 1980s because of the South American Debt Crisis, when the 17 biggest U.S. commercial banks got into trouble because they had lent substantial amounts of money there. Continental Illinois actually failed in 1984 and was essentially nationalized by the government. The other 16 banks were indirectly bailed out. At that point going forward the big banks knew they could do no wrong. A much bigger bailout was necessary during the Savings and Loan Crisis and a now a much, much bigger bailout has been necessary because of the Credit Crisis (something that Moral Hazard theory predicted would happen). Does the deeply concerned Bernanke have any plans to fix this problem? It doesn't appear so.

The trade-weighted dollar ETF was at 78.50 the last time I checked, just above the 78.33 breakdown point. Something is almost certainly going on behind the scenes. Gold was as high as 956 this morning, but had a sharp drop the moment U.S. trading opened - something that happens over and over and over again. An academic study analyzing the pattern concluded that this could only take place because of market manipulation. The regulatory body CFTC is not likely to hold hearings however even though they recently claimed that they were out to stop market manipulation (it's similar to Bernanke being concerned about bailing out the big banks). Apparently though, they can't find it if it is being done by the big players, just as the SEC couldn't realize that Bernie Madoff was a crook.

NEXT: Durable Damaged Goods

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Energy, Commodities and the U.S. Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Light sweet crude fell below 60 this morning in European trading. It has traded as low as 58.86 pre market. Brent seems to be trading higher, which is unusual since it is a poorer quality oil . This type of price inversion was common in February when oil hit its bottom. While a number of commentators claim 60 is strong support for light sweet crude, there is a Fibonacci retracement around 58 and this is a place where the price could hold. We will have to see. There has been too much selling too fast in the oil market and it is has been based on attempts at government manipulation of the market through the CFTC, not because there is an oversupply of oil as the press continually and inaccurately reports (oil in U.S. storage is actually dropping at a precipitous rate).

While the CFTC has regulatory power over all commodity trading in the U.S., it specifically singled out the energy markets for potential trading restrictions. Even though the alleged reason was speculators were causing high prices, it is planning on investigating the natural gas market even though natural gas is trading at a multi-year low (obviously those speculators are incompetent). The real motivation behind the CFTC's action is that the EFT UNG owns 20% of the futures contracts in the market and this is making the big Wall Street players uncomfortable. Issuance of new shares of UNG were suspended on July 7th because regulatory approval wasn't forthcoming. Without the ability to issue new shares with increasing investor demand, an ETF turns into a de facto closed-end fund. Expect this to eventually happen to every ETF. The vested interests are not going to let small investors hone in on their turf.

Every commodity has had a big sell off during July trading and it can all be traced to the CFTC. Fundamentals have nothing to do with it in the case of oil, gold and silver, so you should assume a reversal back to previous values will take place once this is over. While commodities usually trade inversely to the dollar, there has been no dollar rally. The trade-weighted dollar bottomed in early June at 78.40 and has only gotten about 3 cents above the level at its best since then. It closed under 80 again yesterday. Even this morning though the media was reporting 'oil and gold selling off on higher dollar'. They have reported this same story over and over again. One of the news reports today didn't even have any price quote for the dollar, a violation of basic reporting rules. They know their whole story falls apart if people actually have the facts in front of them.

As for the CFTC, will it be investigating manipulation of the silver market by the two big banks with huge short positions? They have been made aware of this, but like the SEC with Bernie Madoff the CFTC is a hear no evil, see no evil operation when it comes to large Wall Street interests manipulating the commodity markets. That is as long as that manipulation supports the government's desire to help prop up the dollar and the economy with lower gold, silver, and oil prices. Short term manipulation eventually leads to long term problems however. Commodity producers just stop producing when the price gets too low and then shortages result if the price is held down too long. Natural gas is probably priced around that level right now.

NEXT: The Non-Stimulating Economic Stimulus Plan

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Quadruple Witching Today; Fraud Update

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Today is quadruple witching, the once every quarter event when equity options, index options, single stock futures and index futures expire. The market will tend to move either up or down to minimize the value of the expiring options. Reversals to undo those moves frequently take place early the next week. After four days of closing below its 200-day moving average, the Dow jumped above this resistance line this morning and it needs to close there today and stay above it next week for the market to be healthy. The US dollar is steady at 80.46 this morning, gold, silver and oil are up slightly.

The big news today is that Texas billionaire Allen Stanford had been indicted and arrested. Stanford is accused of running an $8 billion Ponzi scheme. The SEC first received complaints against Stanford in 2001. The ever on the ball SEC only took four years to launch an investigation. After 'only' four years after the investigation began in 2005, the SEC filed civil fraud charges against Stanford four months ago. It is rumored that Stanford has connections to the CIA.

While Stanford was being indicted, uber fraudster Bernie Madoff settled civil fraud charges with the SEC in his $65 billion Ponzi scheme (something the SEC supposedly failed to notice for a few decades). Even though Madoff has admitted guilt in criminal proceedings, the SEC allowed him to settle its charges against without admitting any wrongdoing! Legal experts were reported as being 'dumbfounded' by this move. Indeed it doesn't make any sense unless the SEC is trying to protect itself and its own involvement in the Madoff scam. Madoff sat on SEC committees. He will be sentenced on June 29th.

If the SEC doesn't find major frauds that can damage the entire financial system, what does it do? It spends its time catching dentists in New Jersey who get tips from their clients and buy a few thousand dollars in options. These small one time transgressions are essentially irrelevant, but make great publicity. The massive ongoing crimes are ignored. It also looks like the SEC may be participating in the criminal activities that it's supposed to be stopping. If it was closed down tomorrow, would investors be any less safe?

NEXT: The Simple Arithmetic of Hyperinflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

New York Investing Meetup Versus the SEC

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

I would like to thank the 145 people who braved a snow storm last night to come to the February general meeting of the New York Investing meetup. In addition to the scheduled talks on the State of the Market (and why gold is looking good and oil could have a pop up in the near future), the Credit Crisis Update and Art Investing, Shelley Gould flew in from San Francisco and gave a couple of minute introduction to her new SmartStops service. While New York Investing meets the needs of the investing public as long as New York City hasn't been shut down, investors unfortunately don't receive such dedication from the watchdog government agencies that are suppose to be protecting their money.

New allegations arose last night against the SEC and FINRA (the the brokerage industry's self-policing organization). Harry Markopolos, the securities industry executive and fraud investigator who brought allegations against Bernard Madoff to the SEC by 2000, if not earlier, is now saying he feared for his personal and family's safety because of the SEC's inaction (and indeed he should have). Markopolos submitted detailed evidence to the SEC in Boston, New York, and Washington about Madoff's scam and as we all know too well, the SEC did nothing. Markopolos will be appearing before a congressional investigatory committee today.

Markopolos was not alone in being suspicious of Madoff. Anyone who examined his trading strategy knew immediately it was a fraud. How? His trading would have been bigger than the entire volume of the markets he claimed to be trading in. While even a casual observer would realize something crooked was going on, the public watchdog SEC couldn't figure it out. While you may think nothing like this could have happened before, you would be mistaken. The 1962 Salad Oil Scandal (a $175 million fraud then or about $1 billion in today's money) required the same suspension of common sense from the 51 Wall Street banks that lent money to the perpetrator, Tino De Angelis. De Angelis borrowed money from these banks based on his inventory of salad oil, stored in huge tanks in New Jersey which actually contained water with a thin layer of salad oil floating on the top (so field inspectors did indeed see oil when they looked into the top of the tanks). However, publicly available information published by the U.S. government indicated there was less salad oil in the entire United States than De Angelis claimed he had in his New Jersey storage facilities. Apparently this wasn't enough to make Wall Street banks avoid lending to him, just as their contemporaries would make loans to people without any income or assets. Consider this the next time you are tempted to follow Wall Street's investing advice.

In case you may also be thinking things are now going to get a lot better, I would advise you not to get too hopeful just yet. The new head of the SEC is Mary Schapiro (replacing See-No-Evil Christopher Cox). Ms. Schapiro was previously the head of FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority). FINRA at least investigated Madoff several times. They found nothing out of the ordinary and claim they couldn't have because they were only empowered to examine his brokerage business (an almost guaranteed destination of some of the missing $50 billion) and the fraud was perpetrated through his investment business. Congress claims that it was not particularly impressed with It's-Not-My-Job Mary Schapiro's performance in this circumstance. Nevertheless she is now in charge of protecting the public's investments.

NEXT: Only TARP Recipients Should Worry About Deflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Excess Liquidity to Solve Excess Liquidity Problem

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Almost everyone expects the U.S. Fed to lower interest rates by 50 basis points to 50 basis points today. Soon we will find out what will happen when there are no more rate cuts left as I asked rhetorically long ago in one of the New York Investing meetup's You Tube videos. We do know what has happened in the past because of excess liquidity with one bubble inflated after another because of fed policy. Each bubble leaves a trail of victims, many of whom should have known better. The list for the Madoff scandal keeps growing and the similarity to suspended belief that made Enron possible should be noted. While there were a few lone voices saying the emperor had no clothes, the top Wall Street players supported both and questioning from the media just didn't exist.

Hedge funds were one of the many beneficiaries of U.S. government easy money in the 1990s and 2000s. In 1990, there were only 610 of them in the U.S, by the end of 2006, there 9462. Assets under management went from $38.9 billion in 1990 to $1.9 trillion in June of 2008, when according to Bloomberg they peaked. As of November 24th (long before the Madoff scandal) U.S hedge funds returns were down 22% on the year - some protection from the Bear Market! A number of hedge funds themselves invested with Madoff and their clients were generally charged 20% of profits and a one and half percent maintenance fee to get them in on the biggest Ponzi scheme in American history. Just another of example of Wall Street being filled with people who know other people, but know little about investing.

While hedge funds still remain beyond the reach of the average investor (and in many cases this is fortunate), the other big beneficiary of the credit bubble, mutual funds, are also suffering. In the six months between May and October, U.S. mutual funds had a decline of $2.5 trillion in assets. Much, but not all of this, was the result of the declining stock market. Money seems to be flowing into money market funds which hit a record $3.7 trillion last week and have hit records highs for the last 11 consecutive weeks. There also seems to be some shift of funds toward ETFs. Despite the declining market, ETF assets have grown by $104 billion in the first nine months of 2008. Perhaps the American public is slowly realizing that the mutual fund industry is obsolete and does little except take a slice of their investing money in exchange for lower than average market returns?

The New York Investing meetup continually points out that there is no free lunch and much of our investing predictions are based on this simple premise which is why they are so accurate. Don't think we don't get a lot of flack because of this because we do. Most people want to believe in the too good to be true premise (and the Madoff scandal makes it clear that the rich and well-connected are just as susceptible to this as everyone else) and the U.S. government through its interest rate policy, the Treasury through its bailouts and the mass media that refuses to question, all keep the illusion going. Most people of course also don't make money with their investments either. Instead they wind up eating the free lunch and invariably go hungry later on.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Indecent Exposure: Madoff Caught Swimming Naked

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Warren Buffett's famous remark that you only know who's swimming naked when the tide goes out is particularly relevant at the moment with the ultimate Wall Street insider Bernard Madoff accused of operating a $50 billion Ponzi scheme (with an additional $17 billion just 'missing'). The hear no evil, see no evil SEC gets no credit for unmasking this multi-decade fraud, with Madoff confessing to his sons as his scheme fell apart and they in turn notifying the FBI. There are even reports of in-the-know Wall Streeters having invested with Madoff knowing his operation was fraudulent, but they had assumed that it was based on an insider trading scam - it being common knowledge on the Street that the SEC rarely investigates citizens above suspicion (one SEC employee was recently fired for trying to open just such a case) for this behavior.

Madoff is the former chairman of the Nasdaq and the founder of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, a closely-held market-making firm that has operated since 1960. He also ran a hedge fund, which is the source of the supposed $50 billion in fraudulent losses (sustained during the time that former Fed chair Alan Greenspan repeatedly said there was no need to regulate hedge funds). Madoff's hedge fund business didn't register with the SEC until September 2006. What took it so long to do so is a good question. An even better question is, did they investigate the hedge fund since that date and if so why couldn't they uncover the largest fraud in American financial history? Madoff's Investment Securities is also market maker on Nasdaq and huge amounts of funds pass through that operation. Are those funds safe or have some of them been pilfered too?

Investors in Madoff's hedge fund are a who's who of big money people, banks and other hedge funds who should have known better. These include banks Santander, Royal Bank of Scotland, BNP Paribas, HSBC, Nomura and hedge funds Man Group, Tremont Capital Management and Fairfield Greenwich Group. Some big names that have surfaced so far as Madoff investors are Philadelphia Eagles owner Norman Braman, New York Mets owner Fred Wilpon and J. Ezra Merkin, the chairman of GMAC Financial Services (49% owned by looking for a government bailout GM). A number of charities also entrusted their money to Madoff, Senator Frank Lautenberg's family charitable trust among them, and at least one has already closed down as a result.

The revelations of the Madoff fraud are somewhat reminiscent of Richard Whitney scandal during the Great Depression. Whitney was the president of the New York stock exchange from 1930 to 1935 and was also a citizen above suspicion just like Madoff. He was assumed to be a brilliant financier, but this image was also false. He turned to embezzlement to cover up his mounting business losses and to maintain his extravagant lifestyle. The authorities eventually caught up with him, although it didn't take nearly as long as it has with Madoff, and he wound up in Sing Sing. Revelations of financial misdeeds indeed became commonplace in the 1930s as the economy fell apart and you should assume that this will be the happening once again.

NEXT: Excess Liquidity to Solve Excess Liquidity Problem

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.