Has the Rally Begun for Gold, Silver and the Miners?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Gold, silver and their mining stocks have been meandering sideways for months, but it looks like the early stage of a rally has begun. Confirmation of a sustainable uptrend hasn't taken place yet and that is the point when it's a good idea to be fully invested. There is enough reason to start accumulating a position however.

The technical picture for the monetary metals and their mining ETFs on the daily charts brightened considerably on Monday and Tuesday. While this was true for a number of indicators, investors should pay closest attention to the DMI (Directional Market Indicator). This flashed a buy signal for ETF GDX, which represents the senior gold and silver mining stocks. GDXJ, the junior mining stock ETF, and the silver ETF SLV were all on the verge of doing the same on Tuesday. The ETF GLD was positively positioned for a short-term rally, but will not be able to give this signal until rallying for several more days. In any move up or down in gold and silver, it would make sense for the mining stocks to move first.
















While the bullish picture isn't complete just yet on the daily charts, more work needs to be done on the weekly charts. A buy signal on these longer-term charts is the confirmation of a longer-term rally that investors would like to see. This could happen in a week or two and should be followed closely.

There is one other major missing piece for a completely bullish picture and that is the position of the moving averages. GLD, SLV, GDX and GDXJ are all in bearish patterns with the 50-day simple moving average being below the 200-day (or the 10-week is below the 40-week). The prices for all of these ETFs have moved above the 50-day and are heading for the 200-day. That resistance needs to be broken next, and then the 50-day average needs to move above the 200-day. This will take some time for the miners, but possibly very little time for GLD. Probably before this moving average cross takes place, prices will rise above the 65-week (or 325-day) moving averages. Moving and staying above this level should be interpreted as the rally is here to stay and that everything else will fall into place.

The major risk to an ongoing rally in the precious metal sector is the situation in Europe. A major drop in the euro could be bearish because this will cause the U.S. dollar to rise and gold and the dollar usually move in opposite directions. There are times however when they both move together. The risk to the global financial system caused by a euro breakdown could be one of them.

In the very long term, both gold and silver are in secular bull markets that began in 2001. This secular bull is likely to last around 20 years  and could be with us for up to 25. The biggest part of the move in secular bulls is usually in the last few years. We are still in the early stages of this rally.


Disclosure: Accumulating long positions in gold, silver and mining ETFs. 


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Traders Should Watch the Gap

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Anyone who rides a commuter rail in the United States is probably used to hearing a message to 'watch the gap'. The advice also holds for stock trading.

A gap is a price level on a chart where no trading took place from one time unit to the next time unit. This happens on daily charts when the opening price is above or below the previous closing price and the market continues to trade in the direction of the gap. Gaps in the stock market on the daily charts invariably show up on Nasdaq because all stocks open at a price determined by market conditions. Specialists try to balance the buys and sells on the NYSE and this can delay the opening of stocks there and smooth out the price. Since most Dow Industrial stocks trade on the NYSE and its stocks frequently open gradually over several minutes, gaps on the opening are rarely seen on the Dow. This also mutes the gaps on the S&P 500, which contains a significant number of NYSE stocks.

Markets move to fill gaps, or in other words trade at the price points that were missed when the gap was created. Most of the time, this happens anywhere from the next day to a few weeks later. It sometimes takes months or even years however to fill a gap. Short-term traders should be aware of all the gaps within the last few weeks on the indices, stocks, and even the ETFs they trade (even commodity ETFs fill their gaps on the U.S. charts even though these gaps are artificial because trading took place at the appropriate price points overnight). Traders with a longer term view should keep in mind gaps from the last couple of years that have remained unfilled.

Trading of U.S. stocks in the last six weeks can be viewed as an attempt to fill gaps. Nasdaq gapped up on August 1st and that gap was filled on August 6th. Nasdaq gapped down on August 12th and that gap still remains unfilled. Nasdaq gapped down again on August 24th and that gap was finally filled when Nasdaq gapped up on September 1st. The September 1st move however created a new gap. Nasdaq gapped up again on Friday, September 3rd and attempted to fill that gap in yesterday's trading, but didn't quite fall low enough to succeed. So Nasdaq has unfilled gaps both above and below where it is currently trading.

A market that gaps up and a down a lot is usually directionless, volatile, potentially unstable, and possibly manipulated. It can be a boon to short-term traders. It is not something however that a position trader or long-term investor should find attractive. Those with a longer view may wish to consider that Nasdaq has a large gap around 1800 that occurred in July 2009 and still remains unfilled.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Sell Off on Goldman News Has Deeper Roots

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The SEC's announcement on Friday (April 17th) that it was investigating Goldman Sachs on fraud charges seems to have been the cause of a serious market sell off, but other factors were at work as well. While major financial stocks took a hit, so did gold, gold miners, and oil. The tech heavy Nasdaq also had a sharp decline. The market was overbought and options expiration added an extra impetus to the volatility.  In such circumstances, any bad news can cause contagious selling.

While selling was broad based, large cap financials were indeed the epicenter of the damage. Goldman (GS) itself closed down 13% on the day. JP Morgan (JPM) was down 5% and Morgan Stanley (MS) down 6%. XLF, the financial ETF, was down 4.5%. Inexplicably, the gold mining index HUI was down 4.4% and gold and oil were each down over 2%. Gold should have seen safe haven investing flows, but did not.

As for the major market indices, the financial heavy S&P 500 had the biggest drop, falling 1.6%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down only 1.1% and the small cap Russell 2000 ended 1.3% lower. Nasdaq lost 1.4%. On the daily charts, the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 reached overbought territory in the middle of last week. Nasdaq became extremely overbought at the same time. If selling hadn't started on Friday, it would have done so probably at the beginning of this week.

Although the Dow has not gotten to overbought territory, it has other technical issues, namely volume or lack thereof. The Dow finally had a high volume trading day on Friday ... on heavy selling, which added even more weight to the technically negative picture. Overall volume on the Dow has been dropping since the bottom was put in last March, something that should not be taking place during a rally. Even worse, selling has been occurring on above average volume recently. This is known as distribution and indicates big money is getting out of the market. The only above average volume day so far in April was last Friday. The only high volume day in March also saw selling. February was more mixed, but the four highest volume days in January, all well above average, saw selling. 

Where the buying has been taken place in the market is also not encouraging. Only six stocks frequently account for up to 30% of the buying on the NYSE - Citigroup (C), AIG (AIG), Ambac (ABK), Bank of America (BAK), Popular (BPOP) and Fannie Mae (FNM). Considering that AIG and Fannie Mae are nationalized enterprises owned by the U.S. government and Ambac, Citigroup and Popular were penny stocks selling for 1.00 or less during the Credit Crisis, this is not exactly a sterling list of solid growth companies leading the market.

Liquidity is what makes markets go up (good earnings are the result of liquidity, although in the current rally, liberalized accounting standards may be even more important). The fed and other central banks throughout the world have pumped an almost unlimited amount of it into the world financial system since the Credit Crisis began. Too much liquidity over too long a period of time though pumps up stocks to unsustainable levels as happened in 1929, 1987 and 2000. Under such circumstances withdrawing even small amounts of liquidity can have the effect of sticking a pin in a very over inflated balloon.

Disclosure: Long oil.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Agricultural Commodity Prices Weaken on Ample Supplies

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The USDA report on March 31st was bearish for grains. Wheat, soybeans, corn and rice all had significant drops in their last day of the quarter trading. Agriculture commodities have been weak since they peaked in 2008 and a sustainable rally in the immediate future is extremely unlikely.

Food commodities had big rallies starting in 2007 and these lasted into the spring of 2008, when most prices hit their highs. At the top, wheat was over $13 a bushel, soybeans over $16, corn around $7.50, and rough rice around $25.00.  Significant selling followed in later 2008 and into the summer of 2009. A late year rally from last year has now faded. Wheat closed out the first quarter at $4.505, down 21.5 cents or 4.6% on the day. Soybeans were at $9.41, down 33 cents or 3.4% and corn for May delivery closed at $3.45 down 9.5 cents or 2.7%. Rough rice was the least damaged dropping 24.5 cents or 2.0% to $12.215.

The USDA report didn't actually appear to be that negative. U.S. farmers will be planting 9% less wheat in 2010, although winter wheat plantings from last fall were 2% greater than they were initially thought to have been. The soybean crop should only be 1% larger than last year and corn 3%. In a bear market, news tends to be looked at with a negative bias though and there is overreaction to the downside. Agricultural ETFs with significant grain exposure, such as DBA, RJA, and GRU are all trading in bear market patterns with the 50-day moving average trading below the 200-day moving average. The cross just took place for RJA.

While the short-term picture for the grains appears negative, in the long-term prices will go up again. The ability to increase global food production is limited. There is little additional land that can be opened for cultivation and the big yield increases from the Green revolution - use of cross breeding to produce sturdier and more productive plants, the introducion of nitrogen based fertilizers, and extensive applications of pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides - are in the past. Population continues to grow though and the ability to produce more food isn't keeping up. At the same time, improved economies in emerging markets means a greater demand for food from large numbers of the underfed. The basic realities of supply and demand will eventually cause food prices to go back to their 2008 highs and probably much higher. The charts will tell us when this is likely to happen.

Disclosure: None

NEXT:  March Employment Numbers Better Thanks to Government Hiring

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Who Really Benefits from the U.S. Healthcare Bill

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Stock prices anticipate changes six months or more in advance. Healthcare and pharmaceutical stocks have been rising for even longer than that because of proposals in the healthcare legislation that is about to become law. Some ETFs that cover the sector are doing so well that they have even hit all-time highs. The stock market is stating quite clearly that healthcare 'reform' is good for reforming the bottom lines of businesses that operate in the sector.

Certainly there is no question that real reform of the U.S. healthcare system is desperately needed. The U.S. spends much more per capita on its citizens' health and gets less for it than any other developed country. According to UN World Population Prospects, life expectancy in the U.S. ranks 38th worldwide, just behind Chile and Cuba. The system is rife with abuses, only a few of which seem to be addressed by the bill, which by itself will create some more. The myriad minute details of what is actually in the 2000-page bill are known by only very few however, including most of the members of congress who enthusiastically voted for it. Nevertheless, the overarching goals are quite clear.

The key provision of the bill can be summarized as 'everyone will be required to have health insurance, but it won't be provided for, instead you'll have to buy it unless you are poor, and the insurance companies won't be able to exclude those with pre-existing conditions'. The wording of the legislation hides the fact that it is really a gigantic tax increase that will be applied arbitrarily and even worse is subject to unlimited increases without further legislation. The U.S. government doesn't get the tax money however, it merely uses its policing powers to make sure you fork over your money to privately run corporations. Since there is no free lunch, forcing these companies to take customers and engage in behavior that raises their costs, means that they will be raising their prices to maintain their profits. Unlike in a free market, corporate profits are protected in the legislation and the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries will consequently become loosely regulated government protected monopolies (actually oligopolies because there is more than one company involved). For a recent example of what occurs when such entities are created, think of the highly corrupt real estate money-pits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that now require unlimited taxpayer funding to keep them operational.

Health care costs in the U.S. have tended to rise faster than inflation for many years now. There seem to be no controls in the healthcare legislation on future price increases. The public is therefore left completely exposed to paying an every increasing percentage of their income for health insurance. This working and middle class will be hit disproportionately hard. Without significant controls on costs, and this is the most serious issue facing healthcare in the U.S. and the one least addressed by the legislation, the average person will see their healthcare expenditures skyrocket. People who engage in responsible preventative behavior and make great efforts to take care of their health will be rewarded for their efforts by paying more in insurance costs to support those who act irresponsibly.

A simple checkup of healthcare and pharmaceutical ETFs shows what the market thinks of how the healthcare legislation will impact the industry. The pharmaceutical companies jumped on board and supported the healthcare bill early on and in exchange President Obama made a deal with them to exclude negotiation for drug prices. Pharmaceutical ETFs XPY, IHE, and PJP respectively made new all-time highs last fall, in January and just recently. Healthcare provider ETFs FXH and IHF are doing well too. FXH hit an all-time high in December and IHF is at a two-year high and has more than doubled off its low from last spring. The market unquestionably sees healthcare 'reform' as good for business in the sector and anticipates huge increases in profits. Those profits will be coming out of your pocket.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Housing Hype Fades With Sales Numbers

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why Interest Rates Will Rise in 2010

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While stocks were rallying, long-term U.S. treasuries were selling off sharply and interest rates climbing on December 21st. The rally was particularly noteable because 10-year bonds were selling down more strongly that 30-years - the opposite of the normal pattern. As part of its quantitative easing program, the U.S. Fed was purchasing 10-year treasuries up to October 31st of this year and this kept their yield artificially low. This trade now seems to be unwinding. Interest rates on consumer loans in the U.S., including mortgages and credit cards, are usually tied to the the 10-year treasury rate. Higher rates will dampen consumer spending going forward and this will be a negative for the economy in 2010. Investors can take advantage of rising rates though by buying ETFs that short longer-term bonds.

Long-term rates need to be examined in context. The yield spread, or the difference in interest rates, between them and short-dated paper provides significant information. The yield spread between 30-year treasuries and the 3-month t-bill has gotten to around 4.50%. This is much larger than normal. The spread was even bigger this June and in 1992. In the last two recessions in the early 1990s and 2000s, yield spreads didn't peak until about 18-months after the recession was over. They already got to those previous peak levels this June, during the recent recession. This indicates that the peak in the current cycle is going to be higher than it was previously. Assuming the current recession ended in July, as would be inferred from government GDP figures, this would indicate that there will be a peak in the yield spread around January 2011. Note that this is not the same as a peak in rates. The spread will narrow if long-term rates continue to go up, but short-term rates go up even faster.

While it looks like long-term rates are going to be higher in 2010, the exact amount is not predictable from yield spread analysis. From a technical perspective, the 10-year treasury will have a significant breakout if its yield rises above 4.00% and stays there. For the 30-year treasury, the key rate is 5.00%. Possible interest rate targets for the 10-year after a breakout are 4.75% to 5.50% and for the 30-year 6.00% to 7.00%. A breakout is not taking place just yet however. As of now, some time in the first couple of months of 2010 looks like the most likely time frame for this to occur. Investors who want to short 7 to 10 year treasuries can buy TBF (100% short), PST (200% short) or TYO (300% short). Investors who want to short 20 to 30 year treasuries can buy TBT (200% short) or TMV (300% short of 30-years only).

A wide yield spread between short and long term bonds is usually cited as an indication of strong future economic growth. Others say it is an indication of rising inflation expectations. Both views can be correct. The pattern is caused by central banks pumping substantial amounts of liquidity into the financial system. This shows up in the economy and inflation at different points in time. Liquidity first pushes up the stock market (we have already seen that), next impacts the economy, and then shows up as inflation. When there is overlap between the economic growth and inflation phases, stagflation results. It can take as much as three to four years for the first wave of inflation to peak. That would take us to at least 2012 in the current cycle - so we have a long interest rate rally ahead of us.

Disclosure: Long TBT and TMV.

NEXT: GDP Revisons Indicate Recession Isn't Over

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Is the Gold Correction Over?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold has had a sharp sell-off that has took it down over $100 in four trading days from December 3rd to the 8th. The rally that began in early October took spot gold up $200 from the breakout point of $1025 to a high of $1226. Approximately 50% of that was lost by the afternoon of December 8th in New York Globex trading. The $1125 level was tested again the next evening at 2AM New York time in Hong Kong trading. A 50% drop is a key Fibonacci retracement for rallies and a common place where counter moves stop. The next Fibonacci support level would be around $1100 for spot gold if the $1125 level doesn't hold.

Other technical considerations necessitated spot gold's drop to at least the $1125 level. GLD, the largest gold ETF, had a gap on its chart just above the $110 level (it represents one-tenth of an ounce of gold and it trades at a slight discount to the spot price). That gap got filled on Tuesday. It is very common for price to trade down to the bottom of a gap, so this move was not unexpected. GLD then bounced off its 30-day simple moving average. It slightly pierced the 50 RSI level, something it also did in its last sell-off. The 50 level should be acting as support. Only a few trading days previously GLD was overbought on the RSI on the daily charts and this condition was mostly resolved on Friday, December 4th in only one day of trading. GLD was also overbought on the weekly RSI and this is also now mostly resolved, but it looks like a few weeks of back-and-fill sideways trading will still be necessary.

While sharp corrections are unnerving to investors, they are common in strong bull markets. The bigger picture is still very positive for gold and for silver. Not only is there no technical damage on the daily charts, GLD is on a buy signal on both the weekly (intermediate-term) and the monthly charts (longer-term) and so is SLV, the major silver ETF. When in doubt, investors should always consult longer term charts for guidance and remember that in bull markets, pull-backs are opportunities for buying.

When contemplating what to do in a sell-off during a rally, investors should also ask themselves if any important negative major changes are taking place. For the moment, the answer to that is no for gold. Are governments going to stop their super easy money policies or budget-busting stimulus plans? Don't hold your breath. Just yesterday both the U.S. and Japan both announced new stimulus plans. Just today, the U.S. announced that the TARP program would be extended to October 2010. The proverbial government printing presses are still in 24-7 operation and will be for some time. Gold investors will be one the prime beneficiaries of these policy moves.

Disclosure: Long gold and silver

NEXT: The Common Roots of Hyperinflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Falling Supply and Rising Demand Cause Gold to Soar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

February gold futures broke $1200 for the first time a little after 4AM New York time. February 2010 is now the major front month contract after the expiration of the December contract on November 30th. Gold futures were up 14% in November, the best monthly performance in ten years. Silver was also up 14%. Gold traded down only three days in November and hit one all-time high after another during that time. While the major U.S. stock indices were also up, gold and silver shined in comparison. Seasonally-weak oil was flat during the month. The trade-weighted U.S. dollar opened November above 76 and closed out below 75, hitting a new yearly low of 74.23 in the interim.

The price rise in gold is caused by a positive supply demand picture both for the physical metal and in the futures trading pits. For the last twenty years there have been three major sources of gold supply and three major destinations of gold demand. The sources for supply have been mining, scrap (also known as recycled gold) and central bank selling. The three majors uses for gold have been for jewelery, investment and industrial (contrary to popular belief, gold has a wide variety of uses in manufacturing, especially in electronics). Complicating the picture has been central bank leasing to miners, big banks and hedge funds that dumped significant amounts of gold on the market in the 1980s and 1990s and was a major factor in holding gold prices down. The unwinding of these positions, Barrick Gold closing out it hedge book is the most recent example, has been creating upward pressure on gold prices for several years now.

There are two major currents in the shift in market supply and demand. Central banks have shifted from the supply side to the demand side and ETFs have caused a major increase in investment demand. Up to mid-decade, central bank selling accounted for 14% of gold market supply, but in the first half of 2009, central banks became net buyers of gold. As supply dried up from central banks a new increase in demand was created by ETFs that buy and store physical gold. There are now eleven of these globally and none existed before 2003. Their gold holdings have gone from zero to 1766.40 tonnes in the last six years. The largest ETF, GLD, is now the sixth biggest holder of gold in the world (between France and China).

Gold mining has provided as little as 60% of market supply in recent decades. So far gold mining output peaked in 2001. It then fell seven years in a row until 2008. The only major producers with increasing output have been China and Russia. This may have more to do with their transitions from a communist to a more capitalistic economic model than with the contents of their gold mines however. South Africa, which was the top gold producer for much of the last 100 years, is experiencing a rapid drop in gold output and it looks like it will fall to fourth place in global rankings this year. It takes approximately ten years to open a new gold mine and gold prices only started rising in 2001 and many remained convinced for some time that the rally wouldn't last. So don't expect any significant increase in mining output until well after 2010. Barrick Gold closing out its large hedge book though is an indication that they believe gold output is likely to continue falling and prices to continue rising.

While high gold prices mean that jewelery demand will fall, the rise in investment demand will more than overwhelm any drop. In a number of developing economies, jewelery and investment demand are not actually distinguishable as is. Purchasing high-caret jewelery is the traditional method of investing in gold. While India has been the number one market for gold demand, China seems to be in the process of overtaking it. There were significant restrictions that limited gold buying by the Chinese until the early 2000s. Gold demand there has been soaring since the restrictions were lifted.

There are a number of major long-term trend changes going on in the gold market and none of them are likely to end soon. There is probably at least another decade before a new equilibrium is established and major shifts start occurring again and drive the price of gold back down. By the time that happens though, the price of gold is going to be much, much higher than it is today.

Disclosure: Long gold and silver.

NEXT: Is the Gold Rally Getting Frothy?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Rockets Higher

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In a bull market there is always a higher price down the road for those who wait for it. Gold amply demonstrated this concept by hitting a new all time high yesterday (and again this morning). Tuesday's move was sudden and vertical and it took place even though the U.S. dollar was rallying strongly and stocks were selling off. While investors constantly worry about sharp sell offs, they don't usually consider that sharp rallies are also possible for bullish assets. While gold led the way up, silver and then the miners started tagging along shortly thereafter. Eventually all of the inflation trade assets followed. Look for this pattern to repeat.

At the 5:15PM end of New York trading, spot gold closed at $1085.30 yesterday, up almost $25. This took out resistance around the $1070 level. Gold was in a trading range between approximately $1050 and $1070 for awhile before testing its $1025 breakout point. Spot gold has gotten as high as $1094.30 early this morning. This is important implied resistance at $1120. Spot silver closed yesterday at $17.20 up 73 cents. It was up almost a dollar at one point. The 200% leveraged gold ETF DGP was up 4.7% and the 200% silver ETF AGQ was up 10.4% yesterday. Some mining stocks did even better. Novagold (NG) was up 13.2% and Hecla (HL) was up 18%. The U.S. trade-weighted dollar, after rallying strongly in the morning, lost its momentum and essentially closed flat.

What seems to have caused yesterday's gold burst is a story of karma worthy of a Hindi movie. As reported in this blog early Tuesday morning, India bought 200 tonnes of IMF gold. The sale took place during a two-week period that ended on October 30th. This news was generally available in the evening New York time on Monday. Nevertheless, more the one U.S. media outlet reported that India would be or was buying 200 tonnes of gold during the trading day on Tuesday. Gold which had been meandering in price suddenly started moving straight up on the intraday charts blowing out the shorts along the way. The karmic element comes into the story if you know India's past with the IMF. In 1991, during a financial crisis, India had to borrow money from the IMF and was forced to ship its gold reserves to London as collateral. Now they are buying the IMF's gold! Will a future time come, when a Western country has to borrow money from India and in turn be forced to ship their gold to New Delhi?

The movements of gold and the U.S. dollar in the last few days are significant for another reason as well. Since the Credit Crisis began the dollar has rallied before Fed meetings, during the meeting and at least into the day after the meeting. Gold has sold off in response. Things have changed noticeably this time. The Fed met yesterday and is meeting today. The dollar had the usual pre-arranged rally before the meeting and gold was weak, but then things went screwy. Gold suddenly shot to news highs on a big rally and the dollar rally faded as the meeting began. The dollar is already selling off strongly today before the meeting has even ended. Perhaps gold is just too strong and the dollar is just too weak for this manipulaton game to go on any longer.

NEXT: Inflation Trade Picks Up

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Quadruple Witching Today; Market Update

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Once every three months there is a quadruple witching day. This is when market index futures, market index options, stock options, and stock futures all expire on the same day. Volatility can result, but that is more likely to take place a few days before. In general, prices will move to minimize the profits of the buyers of most outstanding options. Reversals of price movements can take place the following week or two and you need to watch out for these.

The trade-weighted U.S. dollar is the key to many market movements currently. It has been selling off as U.S. stocks have rallied since March. A dollar rally should cause market weakness at this point. This dollar/stock relationship is abnormal and would make much more sense for gold. The dollar/gold relationship has actually been much weaker than might be expected. The trade-weighted dollar ETF DXY traded as low as 76.01 yesterday. There is chart support at this level, since there is a sharp low at 75.89 that was made almost exactly one year ago from today. Any break of last years low could cause the dollar to test its all time low of 71.50. A short term rally might be in the offering first however because the dollar is well below its falling 50-day moving average and it tends to move back toward that line when it gets too extended.

A dollar rise could affect both stocks and gold. Spot gold closed at $1013.30 yesterday, its fifth day above the key breakout point of $1004. Gold has made three all time closing highs in the last 5 trading days and this is very bullish. It still needs to break the $1033 intraday high before a longer term rise to the $1200/$1300 area is possible. Gold stocks have been selling off the last two days and may be volatile for several more. Large drops should be considered buying opportunities. Look for gaps to be touched or filled. The most profitable buying is done either on major breakouts or at bottoms (buying after a long run up is a good way to lose your money). Gold is at the cusp of a major breakout.

The current bottoms in the inflation trade are in natural gas, food commodities and possibly long-term interest rates. Buying natural gas on any day with a big drop looks like a good strategy. Food commodities have been trading around their lows since last December, which is a long time. The chart for RJA is quite bullish and it looks like it wants to rally soon. I have started buying it. The food related ETFs are generally much less volatile than precious metal and energy ETFs, so you are not likely to make money as quickly from them. Long term interest rates bottomed last December,with the 10-year bond hitting 2%. The 10-year rate was around 4% in June. Since then, long-term rates have declined. TBT, the leveraged short ETF for bonds of 20+ years duration has sold off a third since June. I have started slowly accumulating it. Long-term rates may not have bottomed just yet, but they are likely to be going much, much higher in the future.

NEXT: IMF Selling Gold to Dampen Rally

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Closes at Record High

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold closed at a record high in New York on Friday. The settlement price of $1004.90 broke the previous record of $1003.20 set on March 18, 2008. The daily intraday high was $1011.90. This is gold's third serious attempt at trying to break to new all time highs. The $1000 level has been tested 5 times so far. A basic rule of technical analysis is that when a price is repeatedly tested, it will eventually break.

A yearly high is bullish and a record high is extremely bullish for any stock or commodity. You would never know it from reading the media reports on gold however. I have seen one article after another warning about how dangerous it is to buy gold at these prices, how a pullback is likely, how the small investor had better stay away, etc., etc. This is actually very bullish for gold. If the media liked it and was saying how great it was, it would probably be time to sell.

Negative media reports all focus on lack of physical gold demand at the moment, particularly in India (Indian consumers own 20% of the world's gold - at least as much as all central banks combined). While this is likely a temporary phenomenon based on when Indians consider it a propitious time to buy gold, you don't usually see that mentioned in articles. You frequently don't see inflation mentioned either and that the demand for investment gold is skyrocketing. This type of demand will eventually overwhelm all other forms of demand. You can also find many articles that report that the ETF GLD isn't buying gold and how negative this is for the market. What is not mentioned is that there are 10 ETFs on world markets that buy physical gold. Overall, there has been net buying recently. Only one of the ten ETFs had decreased holdings and that was GLD. Long gold futures positions have increased by 17% in the last week to 10 days and many investors are likely moving away from physical metal to more leveraged plays.

Gold's recent performance has been helped by the U.S. dollar. The trade-weighted dollar was as low as 76.46 on Friday, well below its breakdown level of 78.33. It is up slightly this morning and gold is hoovering around $1000. The dollar is in danger of hitting a yearly low soon (75.89 at the moment) and if that happens it could fall to its all time low below 72. Some short term rally is likely because the dollar is trading below its falling 50-day moving average. This could in turn cause a short-term drop in gold prices. This would just be another buying opportunity however.

We will be discussing the gold and silver markets at the New York Investing meetup's 'Technical Analysis - Chart Patterns' class this Tuesday night at PS 41 (116 West 11th Street). The class will be held from 6:45-8:45PM.

NEXT: Gas Takes Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

CFTC Kills Off DXO

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

DXO no longer exists. Deutsche Bank announced on September 1st that it would redeem all shares after the market closed on September 9th. DXO was started in June 2008 and had $600 million in assets. It was a investment vehicle that offered hundreds of thousands of small investors a leveraged oil play. Many members of the New York Investing meetup bought it in March and sold it in June of this year and made a 165% profit on this trade. We will not be able to do so again in the future.

The CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission) has been holding hearings this summer to investigate 'speculation' in the oil market. It has specifically targeted ETFs and ETNs in this regard. Deutsche Bank did not directly mention the CFTC in its announcement but said this redemption is the result of “limitations imposed by the exchange” causing a “regulatory event”. How much behind the scenes pressure was put on Deutsche Bank is not known. Deutsche Bank is a holder of U.S. mortgage debt. While it doesn't seem to be on the list of TARP recipients, it did receive approximately $11.8 billion from AIG as a result of the government's nationalization of the company. It can also be assumed that Deutsche Bank benefits from other Fed programs that take junky assets off bank's books and replaces them with higher quality bonds. When the government 'owns you', you are likely to give it what it wants.

It is interesting that the CFTC is concentrating its efforts on 'speculation' from investment entities that are used by small investors. Like the SEC, it hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the large players. For years there have been two large banks that have held large short positions in Silver futures (and Deutsche Bank may be one of those banks). It took years of complaints before the CFTC agreed to investigate, just as the SEC continually ignored complaints about Bernie Madoff and his obvious $65 billion Ponzi scheme. So far, the CFTC has found nothing, just as the SEC never at any point found any wrongdoing on Madoff's part (his Ponzi scheme collapsed on its own accord). If the federal government wanted to limit speculation in the commodities market it could easily have done so, by forcing Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to close down their commodity trading operations. Federal law prohibits banks from speculating in commodities and both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became banks in 2008. The government gave both firms a special five-year dispensation however. If you are a big player, you don't have to worry about 'the rules'.

The government's action in the energy market should be seen for what it is - an attempt at imposing price controls on oil and gas. Price controls never work and almost always lead to shortages and much higher prices. ETFs will not disappear either as a result of the CFTC's action, but will turn into closed-end funds. There will be an attempt to launch more of them. Each one will be smaller, less liquid and have a much higher expense ratio. More will move to overseas markets that are less restrictive. While it is just oil and gas this summer, expect other markets (particularly agricultural) to be affected in the future.

NEXT: The Cash From Clunk-Heads Program

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Natural Gas Deconstructed

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

If you think logically, what is happening in the natural gas market will be difficult for you to understand. Markets actually always act rationally however, if you have all the facts available. When they don't seem to be doing so, it is because there is additional information that needs to be considered in order to fully understand what is taking place. In these circumstances you need to think about what could be taking place behind the scenes that could explain what is going on.

The natural gas storage report was released yesterday and it was bullish. Storage went up 52 BCFs and expectations were they would go up 55 BCFs. Natural gas has been declining for the last 11 days and is a heavily shorted market. So did it go up on bullish news? No, it sold off! The near term futures contract closed at $2.95. This in and of itself makes absolutely no sense and defies all rules in how markets operate. Even more surprising is that the cost of production for natural gas in the U.S. is somewhere around $4 to $5 depending on the source. It was already noted two months ago that 50% of U.S. gas wells had already been shut down because of low prices. Production should be close to collapse at this point.

The natural gas futures market is also in extreme contango (distant future prices much higher than the current futures contract), certainly the most extreme of any market in recent history. And the contango is getting even worse. The average price for natural gas futures between November and March is $5.32. Moreover, the oil/natural gas price ratio went over 24 yesterday. It peaked around 22 in 1990. This is also an historical extreme. When something gets way above (or below) its long term average, it invariably reverts back to the mean over time.

So who's making money off of this? This statement, which I found in an article for futures traders explains it all: "Traders on the future market are able to lock in the difference of over $2 per MMBTUs and cover their risk exposure by storing supplies until next winter." This is a particular boon to the large users of natural gas and these are the people profiting handsomely from the seemingly irrational behavior in the market. Furthermore, all of this has been made possible because of the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), the government regulatory body which is supposed to be keeping the markets honest (and is doing as good a job as the proverbial fox guarding the hen house).

The CFTC announced in June they were planning on reigning in speculation in the market and have been holding hearings this summer. They specifically targeted the UNG ETF as a major source of speculation, even though it is a passive investment vehicle that only buys more natural gas futures in response to investor demand. UNG is also an investment vehicle used by small investors. Along with the SEC, which prevented UNG from issuing news shares for awhile and functioning as an ETF should, the CFTC has tried to cripple UNG's operations. This has allowed the big users of the commodity to drive near term natural gas prices to theoretically impossible levels - and make a killing. Like the SEC and its handling of $65 billion Ponzi Schemer Bernie Madoff (who was investigated several times over a many year period, but no dishonest behavior was ever found), the CFTC hears no evil and sees no evil when it comes to the big players.

As mentioned in yesterday's blog, there is an alternative to UNG. The ETN GAZ also represents the price of natural gas. While UNG lost 50 cents yesterday, GAZ was up 81 cents at one point, although it closed up only 16 cents. The trading volume on GAZ yesterday was enormous reaching almost 17 times the 200-day average. It looked like investors were dumping UNG to buy GAZ, which as an ETN is not affected by the CFTC's investigations. In theory, an ETF and ETN investing in the same commodity should move not only with the commodity, but by the same percentage amount. GAZ actually went up (and by a lot at one point) when natural gas futures were selling off and UNG was down. Just another indication that all rules of reality have temporarily been suspended in the natural gas market.

NEXT: U.S. Dollar, Stocks, Bernanke and Natural Gas

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Commodity Shortage Disaster in the Making

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The government is planning on doing something about those pesky speculators that keep driving up the price of commodities. Even though this has been tried thousands of times previously and has NEVER worked - and even though we have the example of the complete economic collapse in Eastern Europe that this behavior caused - and even though last falls ban on short selling of financial stocks didn't prevent their prices from falling off a cliff - this will not discourage the U.S government from creating a new mess in the commodities markets. It is true that some people never learn and it appears that many of them get elected to political office or work as regulators.

The CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) announced yesterday that it will hold hearings this month and next to explore the need for government-imposed restrictions on speculative trading in oil, gas and other energy markets (even though natural gas is at a multi-year low and oil is 60% off the high it reached one year ago). The CFTC can also set restrictions for other commodities as well and can change margin requirements for trading (and this is also being bandied about). ETFs, which are used as investing vehicles by small investors, were especially singled out for restrictions.

It has been pointed out that insiders like the floor traders and commodity trading firms in Chicago are unlikely to be impacted by the CFTC proposals that are supposed to be protecting the public and not the industry. For those not paying attention, commodity prices nose-dived before this news was released, not after. Probably just an amazing coincidence and not the insiders getting the word before the public (if you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'd like to sell you). It is quite clear that if anyone gets disadvantaged from changes in CFTC policy, it is meant to be the small investor who relies on ETFs and not the big players.

Political pressure is being put on the CFTC by senators Bernie Sanders, who is a Socialist even though the media describes him as an independent and Bryon Dorgan, the biggest economic ignoramus in congress -and that's really saying something, and congressman Bart Stupak from Michigan who wants lower oil and gas prices to protect the state's auto industry (or what's left of it). Attempts to control oil and gas prices were last tried in the U.S. in the early 1970s when Nixon imposed wage and price controls. Oil producer profits were cut to such an extent that U.S. oil production dropped substantially. The U.S. which had been self-sufficient in oil up to 1969, then became extremely dependent on foreign sources. OPEC was then blamed for the shortages and big price hikes that followed, but it was U.S. policy that made it all possible. Did the government blame itself? Of course not! It was those rapacious speculators and evil foreign forces that made it happen. Historical analysis of past inflations shows very clearly that without exception speculators and foreigners are blamed for inflationary price rises that originate with government printing too much currency and then attempting to limit the mess it engendered with price controls. This scenario has played out hundreds, if not thousands, of times. This time will be no different.

The forces of economics can no more be banned by government action than gravity can be outlawed. So what is likely to happen? Since commodity trading is not limited to the U.S, but large active markets exist in London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore and up and coming Dubai, expect trading to increasingly move to those places. Dubai in fact wants to capture more commodity trading business. When U.S. policy hands this to them on a silver platter, except to hear how those scheming Arabs stole this activity from the U.S. ETFs also exist in the English, Canadian and Australian markets (and some others), that American small investors can get access to. Investment money will simply move out of the U.S. - at least until the government tries to impose capital flow restrictions to prevent this (expect this at some point in the future).

If prices of oil are held down temporarily (and it will only be temporarily) by CFTC restrictions or other government action (yes, this will be coming) you can expect shortages in gasoline, heating oil and diesel. There were long gas lines in the 1970s for good reason. While people had to wait a long time and sometimes could only gets a limited quantity of gas, they still got some gas. Heating oil was in danger of running out in certain places - like Minnesota - as well. Things could get much worse this time, since shortages are the only thing you can rely on from price controls. Even worse, prices always wind up higher than they would have been if the price controls had never been imposed in the first place.

One more piece of advice. In case the U.S. government does decide to outlaw gravity and some politician tells you it's safe to jump off the capital building. Make sure you reply, "You first".

NEXT: Government Price Controls in the Making

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

First Four Trading Days Review

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The message from the markets has been quite clear in the last four trading days. The big money is negative and taking its money out. All indices had significant drops today, leaving the first of the quarter indicator highly negative. Technicals deteriorated even further. About the only thing that was up today was the U.S. dollar, although bonds rallied after today's auction was over. The dollar and bonds should be tanking big time. Oil went down even more and the reason for its decline, natural gas and other commodities has now become clear.

The Dow closed down 161 points today, even further below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages. The 50-day is below the 200-day and both are declining, a typical bear pattern. Nasdaq, the strongest of the averages pierced its 50-day today, closing down 41 points. The S&P fell 18 points and broke and closed below its 200-day today after breaking below its 50-day last Thursday. The Russell 2000 fell 10 points and managed to hold just above its 200-day. All and all, a pretty ugly situation.

Light Sweet crude closed at 62.93, but was even lower during the day. Oil has dropped 12% since last Wednesday. While the media is claiming its because it was overpriced and the economy is bad, this is not the reason (as usual, if the press reports it, you should first assume the explanation is wrong). What has happened is CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) says it wants to crack down on rampant speculation in the energy markets, by imposing position limits for commodities of finite supply (which is every commodity). The commission is planning hearings and is also considering raising margin requirements. One of the major implications of this proposal is that ETFs will have quotas imposed on them. The big money players presumably had the news before the public and shorted into it. Will the CTFC investigate this? Don't hold your breath. The people who are supposed to be stopped from speculating are the small investors like yourself, not the big insiders.

A quote from the CFTC news, "The government's use of free markets via auctions to help find prices for hard-to-sell assets in the financial sector shows how adept supply and demand are at setting values. But when it comes to commodities that people, industries, economies and nations depend on, the susceptibility of free markets to manipulation can prove dangerous". Free markets are indeed dangerous to a government that doesn't like the prices they set because it continually overinflates its currency. So we must save the free markets by destroying them! Huh???

It is interesting that this attempt to control rampant speculation in oil is taking place one year exactly after oil peaked at $147 a barrel and while it is now trading in the 60s. Something doesn't seem to make sense with this picture. This move is effectively an attempt to create price controls on commodities (by a government that is constantly telling us that there is deflation and a big risk of prices falling). The only things price controls are effective in creating is big shortages and black markets. They ultimately cause prices to go higher than they would have. When you can't get any gas for your car two years from now you'll at least know why.

NEXT: Commodity Shortage Disaster in the Making

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Best to Step Aside and Watch the Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While the market drop yesterday didn't seem like anything out of the ordinary, the technicals were more damaged than the price drop indicated. Another down day today will give the market indices an even more negative tinge. The Dow (the weakest of the indices) fell and closed below its 200-day moving average yesterday and the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 are testing that line today. A close below their 200s at any point in the next few days would add even more negativity to the story that the technical indicators are telling. Oil also looks like it could have a strong pull back soon as well. Gold and silver have already begun a correction after hitting strong resistance. The U.S. dollar is trying to rally (with lots of help from the powers that be) and bonds are rallying as well.

It is interesting to note that when the dollar started to rally, almost all other asset classes sold off. My interpretation of this is that the rallies we have been seeing are dependent on the Fed and Treasury's massive liquidity injections into the financial system. Any threat to diminish those will damage stocks, precious metals, and oil - at least in the short term. It will help bonds and the dollar. The 10-year was trading at 3.65% this morning, well off from last weeks high of 4.00% (when bond prices go up, interest rates go down) and the trade-weighted dollar was at 80.84. The Fed independently, and then with central bankers from other countries, has made noises in the last week or two about withdrawing liquidity from the system. The markets are reacting, or perhaps more accurately, foolishly overreacting to this. There is no chance of this happening for a long, long time even though one Wall Street economist stated today the recession was over - and she meant the recession on the planet earth!

The EIA oil storage report came out this morning and the picture was mixed. Oil in storage dropped by 3.9 million barrels, but gasoline increased by a whopping 3.4 million barrels. Gasoline is the prime use for oil in the summer months and at least in the short term there is too much of it around. Light sweet crude had already traded as low as 69.28 a barrel early in the morning. I am still interested in owning oil, but not until it falls to around 60 or so (the charts will indicate where). There should be another rally into the summer after that. As for natural gas, it still looks like a good buy whenever it drops. This may or may not happen after its weekly storage report tomorrow, which comes out at 10:30AM New York time.

Trading is all about playing the probabilities. Stocks or commodities that have gone up for a long time and are close to major resistance points usually do not have a high probability of making you a lot more money. The change of falling prices become much higher than the chance of rising prices. At points like these, you should get out. More aggressive traders might want to even take on some short positions when this happens. ETFs are the best vehicle for doing this. Shorting individual stocks is much riskier and not for the inexperienced.

NEXT: Building a BRIC House; Nat Gas and Market Update

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Golden Opportunity with a Silver Lining

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

In the current uncertain environment there are only three things that we know will take place - death, taxes, and that the U.S. Treasury will continue to flood the financial system with newly 'printed' money. While the first two are unabashedly negative, the third can be a golden opportunity with a silver lining. The ability to borrow the money needed to pay for the all the bailouts the government is engaging in never existed. The U.S. reliance on foreign sources to fund its operations was already stretched to the limit when the budget deficit was $400 billion, so printing money is the only way to fund the current year's budget deficit which is approaching $1750 billion. Even worse, news out of China indicates that the foreign money that the U.S. has previously tapped can no longer be relied on. In the last few days the markets seem to finally be grasping this situation with traders dumping U.S. government debt and the dollar and buying up gold and silver.

As long predicted in this blog, China has been selling its U.S. debt. It is not yet dumping it wholesale however (just wait, that day will come), but is rotating out of more risky to less risky paper. China sold a large amount of agency debt (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) and it looks like the U.S. Fed bought it. Certainly no one else in their right mind would have done so.If you go back and look at the Fed's first announcement on quantitative easing, you will see that one of the major purchases for the newly printed money was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds. China has also finally admitted it is worried about inflation in the U.S. and has been buying shorter term paper and avoiding longer term bonds.

The China news was of course negative for the U.S. dollar, but it is by no means the only thing pressuring the currency. A return to normal operating conditions for the global financial system (see comments on the TED Spread in yesterday's blog) is highly dollar negative The dollar has been kept up for the last many months because of its safe haven appeal and as conditions improve outside the U.S., particularly in developing economies, that appeal is waning rapidly. Foreign traders dump U.S. treasuries and repatriate their money under such circumstances. Indeed, long term treasuries broke above the key 3.25% resistance this week (when traders sell bonds the interest rate goes up) as the dollar has sold off against almost every currency. Overnight even the British pound had a major rally against the dollar. Talk about embarrassing!

The inevitable corollary of a falling dollar is rising gold and silver prices. Gold hit a two-month high yesterday, closing above 951. It is on the verge of a major breakout. Silver traded above major resistance at 14.50 during the day and it is only a matter of time before it closes above this key level. Figures released today show the demand for gold bars and coins was up 396% in the fourth quarter of 2008. The spectacular rise of 223% for gold purchases from ETFs seems small in comparison. None of this activity is taking place because Wall Street analysts and other mainstream 'experts' have been telling people to buy precious metals. And don't expect to be hearing about the opportunity from them either while there is still a lot of money to be made. They are usually the last to know about such things.

NEXT: North Korea, OPEC and Precious Metals

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Nasty ETF Surprise

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While studies generally indicate that ETFs are more tax efficient than mutual funds, there can be isolated exceptions and the ProShare family of short and ultrashort ETFs produced a truly shocking example on December 23rd. While ETF capital gains are usually minimal, in this case some of the funds distributions were closer to astronomical. Traders had no chance to adjust their portfolios to avoid the distributions either (and this was no accident), since the capital gains distribution was announced after the close and trading began ex-distribution the next morning. All holders of these ETFs, but especially short-term traders, will be getting a nasty tax bill because of ProShare's actions.

Ironically, the reason for the huge distributions are the success of the short and ultrashort ETFs. With the big drops in stocks this year, the ultrashort ETFs, which use margin to create a 200% short position, have been the biggest money makers by far. ETFs usually only incur capital gains when the indices or baskets of stocks they represent have bankruptcies, takeovers, or need to be rebalanced for other reasons. Apparently there was a lot more activity in these types or transactions in the short and ultrashort ETFs (all transactions get magnified in the ultrashort portfolios) in 2008 than in previous years.

The ProShae ETFs with the biggest distributions were:

1. $50.35 per share - SJL: Ultrashort Russell Midcap Value
2. $47.85 per share - SIJ: Ultrashort Industrials
3. $47.78 per share - SDK: Ultrashort Russell Midcap Growth
4 $42.35 per share - SSG: Ultrashort Semiconductors
5. $39.74 per share - SKK: Ultrashort Russell 2000 Growth

A full list can be found at: http://www.proshares.com/resources/news/36601289.html

If you were holding these ETFs in a non-taxable retirement account, capital gains distributions mean very little. Traders in taxable accounts however need to be careful in December. Anything ultrashort is not something that is meant to be a buy and hold position. By definition these are short term plays. You may want to take a holiday break from this type of ETF between Thanksgiving and New Years. New positions particularly should be avoided. The same advice will be good for the ultralong ETFs during a bull period.

NEXT: Pay attention to the First Four Trading Days of 2009

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Excess Liquidity to Solve Excess Liquidity Problem

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Almost everyone expects the U.S. Fed to lower interest rates by 50 basis points to 50 basis points today. Soon we will find out what will happen when there are no more rate cuts left as I asked rhetorically long ago in one of the New York Investing meetup's You Tube videos. We do know what has happened in the past because of excess liquidity with one bubble inflated after another because of fed policy. Each bubble leaves a trail of victims, many of whom should have known better. The list for the Madoff scandal keeps growing and the similarity to suspended belief that made Enron possible should be noted. While there were a few lone voices saying the emperor had no clothes, the top Wall Street players supported both and questioning from the media just didn't exist.

Hedge funds were one of the many beneficiaries of U.S. government easy money in the 1990s and 2000s. In 1990, there were only 610 of them in the U.S, by the end of 2006, there 9462. Assets under management went from $38.9 billion in 1990 to $1.9 trillion in June of 2008, when according to Bloomberg they peaked. As of November 24th (long before the Madoff scandal) U.S hedge funds returns were down 22% on the year - some protection from the Bear Market! A number of hedge funds themselves invested with Madoff and their clients were generally charged 20% of profits and a one and half percent maintenance fee to get them in on the biggest Ponzi scheme in American history. Just another of example of Wall Street being filled with people who know other people, but know little about investing.

While hedge funds still remain beyond the reach of the average investor (and in many cases this is fortunate), the other big beneficiary of the credit bubble, mutual funds, are also suffering. In the six months between May and October, U.S. mutual funds had a decline of $2.5 trillion in assets. Much, but not all of this, was the result of the declining stock market. Money seems to be flowing into money market funds which hit a record $3.7 trillion last week and have hit records highs for the last 11 consecutive weeks. There also seems to be some shift of funds toward ETFs. Despite the declining market, ETF assets have grown by $104 billion in the first nine months of 2008. Perhaps the American public is slowly realizing that the mutual fund industry is obsolete and does little except take a slice of their investing money in exchange for lower than average market returns?

The New York Investing meetup continually points out that there is no free lunch and much of our investing predictions are based on this simple premise which is why they are so accurate. Don't think we don't get a lot of flack because of this because we do. Most people want to believe in the too good to be true premise (and the Madoff scandal makes it clear that the rich and well-connected are just as susceptible to this as everyone else) and the U.S. government through its interest rate policy, the Treasury through its bailouts and the mass media that refuses to question, all keep the illusion going. Most people of course also don't make money with their investments either. Instead they wind up eating the free lunch and invariably go hungry later on.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.