Rallies Make You Rich, No Matter What the Type

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While the major indices were flat yesterday a lot was going on below the surface in the market. Oil went on another incredible roller coaster ride, opening way down, getting close to even and then closing with smaller losses. It's back above the breakout point again in European trading this morning. A lot of small cap stocks, including some oil and gas drillers and producers, had major rallies yesterday however. In fact, the beaten down inexpensive under $5 stocks - the ones that almost every financial advisor tells you categorically to avoid are the stars of this rally. This is nothing new, its always the case in short-covering, technically based rallies.

Oil is repeating the behavior pattern at $50 that took place when it traded around $40. It went above $40 and was driven back below it over and over again. The oil "experts" were repeatedly quoted in the media that a price over $40 couldn't be justified. Oil would then go below $40 and would shortly thereafter bounce right back above it. It then shot up to $45, which the "experts" said was too high. It then promptly went to $50. Yesterday was the 4th time light sweet crude was driven below the key $50.50 breakout point. This morning in European trading it shot back above it. The market has continually shown that the oil "experts" the mainstream media quotes are wrong. Nothing succeeds like failure in financial media coverage however (much like in Washington, D.C.). The media seems to seek out "experts" who have never made a correct prediction in their entire careers.

The "experts" will also tell you not to buy stocks under $5 and stocks that have had huge price drops because they are unsafe. Better to stick with 'sure things' like Enron and those Bernie Madoff funds instead. When the market has has a major drop, buying low-priced, beaten down stocks are the key to making the most money in the rally that follows. Just make sure the company is financially viable - a current ratio around 2.0 and positive operating cash flow are the signs the company is likely to continue its operations. Low or no debt is even better, but not necessary. Running out of cash and failure to make debt payments is what drives companies into bankruptcy. On a fundamental basis, you can find a number of low-priced stocks that have very low price earnings ratios, price to book values well below one and even with price cash flow ratios below one (the price is below the amount of cash generated for the most recent year). There are also stocks with real dividends above 20%. These stocks are major bargains by any criteria. Oil and gas, coal (even in its bright, shiny form), and shipping are the richest source of these stocks. There are a few bargains in technology as well.

Yet is the mainstream media telling you to buy, buy, buy? Not at all. It is filling you with fear and telling you this is a suckers rally. Every rally is actually a suckers rally however. In a bull market, the suckers are the people who buy and then hold. In a bear market, its the people who sit on the sidelines and don't buy at the bottom or close to the bottom or even after the market is off the bottom because the financial media is warning them about losing money. If you are doing this, just remember every major financial publication had nice things to say about Enron. How much money do you think you'll make if you follow the investment advice of those people?

NEXT: The Deflation Boogieman, Oil and Intel

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Pay Attention to the First Four Trading Days of 2009

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

As of today, it looks the Dow will have had its third worst year since its creation in the late 1800s. Only 1931 (the record holder) and 1907 were worse. Both were depression years. There was no central bank in 1907 to prop the market up (J.P. Morgan himself organized the rescue and prevented a complete meltdown of the U.S. financial system) and while the Federal Reserve existed in 1931, it was engaging in restrictive monetary policies instead of the non-stop currency printing that it going on today. The years following 1907 and 1931 had very different outcomes. 1908 was one of the best years for U.S. stocks in the twentieth century, 1932 was closer to one of the worst (but stock prices were volatile to say the least).

So what should we expect for stock in 2009? We don't know yet, but we will be getting some hints in the next few days. Large pools of investing money get shifted at the beginning of the year. It is important to note where money is flowing out of and where it is flowing to. Don't just look at the market overall, but at cap size, industries and individual commodities such as gold, silver, oil and food. Note what is rallying and what is selling off in the first four trading days, especially the biggest moves. This will tell you what investments the money is going out of and going to.

Shifts in buying in certain market sectors don't mean a straight up move however. It is not uncommon for rallies in the first four days to have some pullback later in January and this can provide you with a buying opportunity. There is also no guarantee that the selling won't last longer than that also. You need to be particularly aware of this for commodities with seasonal patterns (such as oil and gas).

You are probably seeing in the mass media "expert" advice for investing in 2009. In general, you should ignore it and pay attention to the ultimate expert - the market itself. The market will soon be giving us some hints about where to find good investments. You should remember that there is always opportunity to make money in the markets and there are a lot of reasons to think that 2009 could be very promising in that regard.

NEXT: The Market Backdrop for 2009 - the Big Picture

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

All The Glitters Isn't Gold, It's Also Silver

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Commodities are priced in U.S. dollars. When the Fed began its rate cutting campaign in earnest on September 18, 2007, it became inevitable that the U.S. dollar would fall. While the value of the dollar goes up and down all the time, this time the drop would have serious consequences. The trade-weighted dollar was hoovering just above all time lows in August and would fall through multi-decade support by the end of September to reach levels never before seen. Since the dollar was hitting all time lows and commodities were priced in dollars, everything else being equal, it was reasonable to assume many commodities would subsequently be hitting all time highs. This is exactly what happened to commodities that were consumer necessities or that were currency substitutes.

The biggest price rises took place in food commodities. Wheat had already started rallying in mid-2007. Once it became clear that the Fed was beginning a new easing policy in mid August, the price of wheat on the charts started to move straight up. By the end of September its price would almost be double what it had been only three months before. Major rallies in soybeans, corn, and rice also occurred taking them to multi-decade or all time highs as well. These rallies in turn showed up in rising global food prices, up 20% for 2007 and 75% since the lows of 2000. While U.S. consumers were paying more at the supermarket just like consumers elsewhere, the Federal Reserve continued it long term policy of generally ignoring rising food (and energy) prices because they were 'volatile'. While food prices can indeed be volatile, a report by Bloomberg News found there had not been a year over year drop in food prices in the United States for at least 40 years.

Like food, energy prices were also not a part of core inflation, so the Fed tried its best to ignore them as well. U.S. consumers unfortunately did not have this option. By the end of September, oil had broken through it's all time high set in mid-2006 and headed toward a $100 a barrel, which it reached around the turn of the year. While this was a new nominal high, it was approximately only the 1980 high adjusted for (official) inflation. Interestingly, the price of gasoline at the pump did not break its 2005 post-Katrina high, when oil was only $70 a barrel, until March of 2008.

Finally, the money-substitute commodities, gold and silver, also had significant rallies. Gold broke its April 2006 high before the end of September, while silver lagged by several weeks. Gold would break its January 1980 nominal closing spot-price high in November and the all-time intraday high of $875 an ounce somewhat thereafter. Gold would reach 1000 in March 2008. Unlike oil, gold was not even near its (official) inflation-adjusted high of approximately $2200 an ounce. While percentage wise, Silver had an even bigger rally than gold, reaching $21 an ounce in March of 2008. This was not even near its approximately $50 nominal price high in January 1980, not to mention its over $130 inflation adjusted high.

For more on this topic, please see notes for the talks, "Thinking Outside the Bucks - Inflationary Investing" and "How to Profit from the Falling Dollar" at: http://invesing.meetup.com/21/files
and our video, "Commodity Investing - How to Profit From the Falling Dollar" at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG5zApWcOk0.

Next: Australian and Canadian - the Only Dollars Worth Holding

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

Please see our web site for more about our group: http://investing.meetup.com/21.