John Paulson Says Double-Digit Inflation is Coming

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.   

As average U.S. gas prices head toward $4.00 a gallon, billionaire hedge fund operator John Paulson recently told a standing room only crowd at New York’s University Club that double-digit inflation is about to rear its ugly head. Paulson assumes that the Fed will continue to engage in its inflation-creating behavior.

John Paulson is famous for making a killing on shorting subprime bonds before their collapse. Most of Wall Street was bullish at the time and Fed Chair Ben Bernanke famously declared that he didn't see subprime mortgages causing any problem. The market completely fell apart weeks after Bernanke spoke.

The Paulson Bernanke dynamic is now back in play with predictions of inflation. Bernanke doesn't see it now and doesn't anticipate it. In an interview with ABC News done around the same time that Paulson gave his talk, Bernanke stated "We haven't quite yet got to the point where we can be completely confident that we're on a track to full recovery," and he continued that the central bank would take no options off the table to further stimulate the economy.  The interviewer didn't ask Bernanke the obvious question of whether or not the need for further Fed stimulus after four years indicates that the previous efforts have been a failure.

Paulson's presumption that the Fed will continue to feed inflation forces is completely supported by Bernanke's actions and statements. The Fed Chair further blamed rising oil and U.S. gasoline prices on geopolitical tensions. Prior to the mid-2000s though, geopolitical tensions only raised the price of oil to $40 a barrel. This time it's well over $100 a barrel. Money printing accounts for the price difference, but you'll never hear that from the Fed's money-printer-in-chief. And this is to expected. No government in inflation's 2000 year history has ever taken full responsibility for causing it.

Governments also have a history of finagling with the inflation numbers as well. This seems to be a universal practice once some form of indexation takes place (adjusting prices for inflation). The U.S. introduced indexation for social security and tax brackets in the 1970s. Starting it the 1980s, a number of statistical "improvements" were introduced in how the inflation rate was calculated. Interestingly, all of these "improvements" lowered the reported rate.

When it comes to inflation predictions, investors have a choice between John Paulson, who has made billions from his knowledge of how markets works, and Ben Bernanke, who has repeatedly shown he is oblivious to their dangers (remember how he let Lehman Brothers go under and this almost led to the complete collapse of the global financial system?). If you are betting on Bernanke, you are betting against history repeating itself. Money-printing has always led to massive inflation in the past. Apparently, John Paulson knows this.


Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

How Good are February Retail Sales Figures if You Consider Inflation?

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Unadjusted for inflation, U.S. retail sales rose 1.1% in February. There may have been little or no gain if price increases are accurately taken into account.

Retail sales going up in the beginning months of the year should surprise no one because this is when companies typically raise prices. Anyone who goes to Starbucks is aware of this practice. It pervades a number of industries across the spectrum. Clothing prices are being hit particularly hard this year with jumps in prices estimated to be around 10% for the spring season (already underway in February). Mainstream media reports on February retail sales did glowingly mention that sales at clothing stores were higher while neglecting to report that higher prices were the reason.

This is not the only source of price increases in early 2012 however. Year over year, gasoline had the second  greatest percentage increase (10.3%) in the retail sales report. This can be considered a measure of energy inflation and not an indication that more product is being sold. A rough approximation of food inflation can be garnered from the Food and Beverages category. Year over year this increased by 3.7%, while the U.S. population is estimated to have grown only 0.7%. If inflation is the actual driver of higher retail sales, it would be reasonable to assume that the one area with chronically lower prices — electronics — would see a decline in sales. Year over year, sales in the Electronics and Appliance category did indeed fall by 1.4%.

Interestingly, the biggest increase in any retail sales category was in Building Materials and Garden Supplies. This was up 13.8% year over year. It is quite possible that the unusually warm winter weather pushed garden supplies purchases into February, instead of March (the numbers are seasonally adjusted and much higher garden supply sales in February would be magnified because of this). Prices for many building materials are rising sharply as well however. Lumber has been the one major exception, but even lumber prices rose this February.

Retail sales account for approximately 70% of the U.S. GDP, so how they behave gives a good indication of how the economy is performing.  Higher inflation is not an indication of a better economy though, it indicates just the opposite. The U.S. retail sales numbers are not adjusted for inflation, nor are the CPI numbers an adequate indication (they underestimate the actual inflation rate significantly). Analysis of the February report indicates that inflation is allowing the government to report better numbers. Investors need to keep this in mind. 


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Economic Reports Indicate U.S.Economy Heading Down

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Default notices on U.S. home mortgages rose 33% in July. Retail sales and food services rose only 0.0% -- adjusted for inflation they were negative. The CPI inflation measure for August came in at 0.4%, almost as high as it was in July.  Weekly jobless claims rose again this week, coming in at 428,000.  All are pointing to an economy in trouble.

The Great Recession began in the housing market after subprime loans started to default in large numbers in 2007. The U.S. economy will continue to have difficulties until all the excesses are ringed out of house prices. Government policy has instead been geared toward stabilizing the market with temporary fixes. The Federal Reserve instituted a number of programs to funnel money into the mortgage markets to protect the banks that had too much exposure to real estate loans and the Obama administration has created programs like HAMP (Home Affordable Mortgage Program) to lower the foreclosure rate. Banks themselves have avoided or delayed foreclosures as long as possible because they don't want the properties on their books. All the government's efforts have certainly slowed down the rate of foreclosures and that may ultimately be all that they accomplish. A 33% increase of foreclosure notices in July indicates a new wave of foreclosures is likely next year.

Meanwhile, U.S. retail sales are declining if you take inflation into account. Retail sales increased strongly with rising home prices in the first years of the 2000s, but after the housing market turned south they have yet to recover. They have been held up by trillion dollar plus annual federal budget deficits, Federal Reserve money printing, and government stimulus programs including the 'Cash for Clunkers' gift to the auto industry. Despite all of these efforts, retail sales and food services were up 0.0% in July (the same 0.0% for jobs created in August). The mainstream media reported 0.1%, but this is only the retail sales component of the report. The report is not adjusted for inflation, so even if retail sales rose 10% a year, but inflation was also 10%, there would be no actual growth (although that is not the story you would get from mainstream news sources).

Retail sales are crucial for the U.S. economy because they make up approximately 70% of GDP. If they don't grow in real terms (after being adjusted for inflation), it is difficult for the economy to grow. To get a quick read on how the retail sales numbers are being impacted by rising prices all that is necessary is to look at the gasoline sales subcomponent. There is no reason to think Americans are using a lot more gasoline from year to year, if anything less is being used. Yet, year over year gasoline sales are up 20.8%. This is caused by inflation. Retail sales and food services overall were up 7.2% year over year. Adjusted for a realistic inflation rate, this number would be somewhat negative. 

That is not to say that the government is reporting an inflation rate that high. The just released CPI for August was 0.4% or 4.8% on an annualized basis. It was 0.5% in July or 6.0% on an annualized basis. Alternative inflation measures from ShadowStats.com indicate actual U.S. inflation is several percentage points higher than the official numbers indicate. ShadowStats.com calculates its inflation numbers the same way the U.S. government did in the 1970s. Since there have been many changes in how U.S. inflation is determined since then, it is not meaningful to compare current numbers to the past ones since doing so is like comparing apples to oranges. The ShadowStats numbers indicate that inflation is much higher now or if you don’t accept that, then you are left with the absurd conclusion that high inflation didn’t exist in the 1970s (you will find that this is the case if you use current methods to recalculate the 1970s inflation numbers).

The other major drag on the U.S. economy -- lack of jobs -- also seems to be getting worse. Weekly claims rose again this week to 428,000. Over 400,000 is considered a recessionary level. With the exception of a few weeks, these have been continually over 400,000 for almost three years now, indicating an ongoing recession (despite all the claims to the contrary of a recovery). The trend is actually worse than it appears however. These numbers should strongly regress toward the mean (move back to the long-term average), but haven't as of yet. As a recession goes on and on eventually everyone that is going to be laid off eventually has been and that should cause this number to decline for statistical reasons even if the economy isn't improving. That it has managed to stay at such high levels for almost three years is truly amazing.

The overall picture provided by U.S. economic reports indicates a flat or declining economy with rising inflation. Little progress seems to have been made in the last three years. The new credit crisis arising in Europe is only going to make matters worse. The U.S. economy was merely weak before Lehman Brothers defaulted, but it fell off a cliff after that.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Hits Another High as Producer Prices Rise

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. producer prices were up 0.4% in August after rising 0.2% in July. The core rate, which excludes the items where most inflation occurs, was up only slightly. Inflation sensitive gold hit a new high on the news.

The main driver of the increase in the August PPI was energy costs. Gasoline rose 7.5% and even home heating oil was up 7.0% during the month. Both have had some price reversal since then. Food prices supposedly dropped 0.3% because of lower vegetable costs. I personally haven't noticed this, but then again I don't get to shop in the Fantasy Land supermarket like most government statisticians.

The inflation linked precious metals were both higher on the news. Spot gold rose to $1278.30 in morning trade and silver reached $20.78. Gold is likely to have another gain in 2010 and if it does, that would make it ten consecutive years of price rises for the yellow metal. Gold and silver are seasonally strong between August and March. 

The price of gold is strongly linked to the loss of value in paper currencies. While many economists refuse to admit it, this is the definition of inflation. Gold has continually risen during the last decade (in dollar terms) as the U.S. government has consistently reported low and then ultra-low inflation rates. Either gold or the government is mistaken about inflation. Gold has a 5,000 year record of accuracy. How many governments have been around that long?

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

2009 Retail Sales Deconstructed

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. retail sales for December 2009 were down 0.3%. News outlets reported this as a surprising turn of events. While I am tempted to agree with that viewpoint, it is only because there is enough inflation in the system to make retail sales look better. The retail numbers are not adjusted for price increases and this should always be kept in mind when viewing them. Higher retail numbers don't necessarily mean a better economy.

The Commerce Department reported retail sales were up 5.4% year over year. It would have been almost impossible for them to be lower, since December 2008 was when the Credit Crisis was close to its worse point. Nevertheless, three major retail categories - Electronic and Appliance Stores, Building Materials and Garden Equipment and Supplies, and Furniture and Home Furnishings - had lower sales in December 2009 than they did a year earlier. These three retail sectors are dependent on the health of the real estate market. 

So what went up to improve the numbers?  Gasoline sales rose 34% year over year and by themselves accounted for almost 50% of the total increase in the raw numbers.  This is pure inflation. It is not likely that actual gasoline use is up, especially with the Cash for Clunkers program having subsidized more fuel-efficient vehicles for American motorists.  Sales for Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers were up 6% from 2008 and this accounted for another 19% of the increase in the yearly total. Government bailouts and stimulus programs are responsible for this increase. If you removed the inflation factor, and gasoline sales represent  only some of the inflation that might be in the numbers, and government programs that directly created higher sales, how much improvement would there have been?  Not much and there may have been none at all - so much for economic recovery.

There was one other important piece of information in the report for December that has significant ramifications. Sales at non-store retailers were up over 10% in 2009. Shifting of buying to the Internet is a strong negative for retailers doing business in physical stores, which are still struggling because of the economic downturn. This indicates that commercial lending, currently one of the major weak points in the U.S. banking system, will be even more troubled than it would have been from just the recession alone. Investors should assume more bailout money will be needed and this problem will go on longer than anticipated. However, as the retail sales report shows, government money can prop up an ailing sector of the economy, can make the economic numbers look better, and can create inflation, but it can't necessarily buy a recovery.

Disclosure: Not applicable.

NEXT: Toothless CFTC Tries to Bite Gold and Silver

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Update - EIA, CFTC, and USD

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Light sweet crude fell 5.8% yesterday, a crash level one day drop. The EIA weekly storage report set off the selling. Crude closed at $63.35. It was $3.60 below Brent, a lower quality oil. The CFTC has started hearings this week and traders are claiming that they are completely politically motivated. Their evidence? - the CFTC's own reports. Oil was also damaged by a rising dollar. The dollar was rallying on the 'good news' that the U.S. was printing money to buy its own bonds (no that doesn't make any sense). As has been the case since the beginning of June, when the dollar goes up, everything else went down.

The EIA reported that oil storage was up 5.1 million barrels. Distillates were up 2.1 million barrels, but gasoline stocks fell 2.3 million. The mainstream media reported that distillate stocks were at their highest level in 25 years (take that with a grain of salt). Year over year distillate demand is down 10.7% and jet fuel demand dropped 13.3%. Gasoline demand is up by 0.8% however. At his time of year gasoline is the key demand driver for the oil market.

The CFTC has started its hearings this week trying to track down the evil speculators that have been manipulating the oil market. Interestingly, on Monday the Wall Street Journal reported the CFTC "plans to issue a report next month suggesting speculators played a significant role in driving wild swings in oil prices - a reversal of an earlier CFTC position." On Tuesday, the Journal reported that the CFTC is "updating- but not necessarily reversing - a 2008 report that blamed supply and demand, rather than speculators" for last year's spike in oil prices. So let me summarize this news for you. The CFTC already investigated this subject last year and found that the oil market like every other market operates on supply and demand. Not trusting its own work and the basic laws of economics, it has decided to investigate again. To get to the truth, it is holding hearings. However, before the hearings have even begun and data gathered, a decision was already made to blame speculators in the report that will be issued. At this point, you should be smelling a giant rat the size of Washington, D.C.

I actually don't doubt for a moment that there is speculation driving the price of oil to non-market prices. It's not taking place on the trading floors in New York, London or Singapore however, but from government offices on the Potomoc and Thames. To help clarify this picture, it might be a good idea to change Ben Bernanke's title from Fed Chair to Speculator-in-Chief. At least then, the public would know what he is really up to.

NEXT: Economy is Bad, but GDP Report is OK

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Commodity Shortage Disaster in the Making

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The government is planning on doing something about those pesky speculators that keep driving up the price of commodities. Even though this has been tried thousands of times previously and has NEVER worked - and even though we have the example of the complete economic collapse in Eastern Europe that this behavior caused - and even though last falls ban on short selling of financial stocks didn't prevent their prices from falling off a cliff - this will not discourage the U.S government from creating a new mess in the commodities markets. It is true that some people never learn and it appears that many of them get elected to political office or work as regulators.

The CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) announced yesterday that it will hold hearings this month and next to explore the need for government-imposed restrictions on speculative trading in oil, gas and other energy markets (even though natural gas is at a multi-year low and oil is 60% off the high it reached one year ago). The CFTC can also set restrictions for other commodities as well and can change margin requirements for trading (and this is also being bandied about). ETFs, which are used as investing vehicles by small investors, were especially singled out for restrictions.

It has been pointed out that insiders like the floor traders and commodity trading firms in Chicago are unlikely to be impacted by the CFTC proposals that are supposed to be protecting the public and not the industry. For those not paying attention, commodity prices nose-dived before this news was released, not after. Probably just an amazing coincidence and not the insiders getting the word before the public (if you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I'd like to sell you). It is quite clear that if anyone gets disadvantaged from changes in CFTC policy, it is meant to be the small investor who relies on ETFs and not the big players.

Political pressure is being put on the CFTC by senators Bernie Sanders, who is a Socialist even though the media describes him as an independent and Bryon Dorgan, the biggest economic ignoramus in congress -and that's really saying something, and congressman Bart Stupak from Michigan who wants lower oil and gas prices to protect the state's auto industry (or what's left of it). Attempts to control oil and gas prices were last tried in the U.S. in the early 1970s when Nixon imposed wage and price controls. Oil producer profits were cut to such an extent that U.S. oil production dropped substantially. The U.S. which had been self-sufficient in oil up to 1969, then became extremely dependent on foreign sources. OPEC was then blamed for the shortages and big price hikes that followed, but it was U.S. policy that made it all possible. Did the government blame itself? Of course not! It was those rapacious speculators and evil foreign forces that made it happen. Historical analysis of past inflations shows very clearly that without exception speculators and foreigners are blamed for inflationary price rises that originate with government printing too much currency and then attempting to limit the mess it engendered with price controls. This scenario has played out hundreds, if not thousands, of times. This time will be no different.

The forces of economics can no more be banned by government action than gravity can be outlawed. So what is likely to happen? Since commodity trading is not limited to the U.S, but large active markets exist in London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore and up and coming Dubai, expect trading to increasingly move to those places. Dubai in fact wants to capture more commodity trading business. When U.S. policy hands this to them on a silver platter, except to hear how those scheming Arabs stole this activity from the U.S. ETFs also exist in the English, Canadian and Australian markets (and some others), that American small investors can get access to. Investment money will simply move out of the U.S. - at least until the government tries to impose capital flow restrictions to prevent this (expect this at some point in the future).

If prices of oil are held down temporarily (and it will only be temporarily) by CFTC restrictions or other government action (yes, this will be coming) you can expect shortages in gasoline, heating oil and diesel. There were long gas lines in the 1970s for good reason. While people had to wait a long time and sometimes could only gets a limited quantity of gas, they still got some gas. Heating oil was in danger of running out in certain places - like Minnesota - as well. Things could get much worse this time, since shortages are the only thing you can rely on from price controls. Even worse, prices always wind up higher than they would have been if the price controls had never been imposed in the first place.

One more piece of advice. In case the U.S. government does decide to outlaw gravity and some politician tells you it's safe to jump off the capital building. Make sure you reply, "You first".

NEXT: Government Price Controls in the Making

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Gases Up; Bear Bites Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Week after week after week this spring the media reported a glut in U.S. oil supply. This blog and the New York Investing meetup had to debunk this view of the state of the energy markets more than once. The supply report today once again confirms that the only glut that existed was in the imagination of reporters working for the big media outlets. Storage was way below expectations across the board for oil, gasoline and distillates. This has yet to happen in natural gas, but the market is in super contango just as the oil was in January and early February of this year. Indirectly bullish for oil and natural gas going forward was Russia's announcement today that it is reducing its U.S. Treasury holdings.

Expectations for the EIA's storage report was for a drop of 500,000 barrels of oil and an increase of 750,000 barrels of gasoline and 1.5 million barrels of distillates. Instead, oil in storage fell by 4.4 million barrels, gasoline fell by 1.6 million barrels and distillates fell by 300,000 barrels. This is the third oil report in the last four weeks that indicated a large drop in storage. The oil markets barely moved on this incredibly bullish report, although light sweet crude has been trading today around 71, above the key resistance point of 70.80.

Unlike oil, which has been rallying since mid-February, natural gas has been in the doldrums and is the worst performing commodity this year. This may be changing soon. Natural gas futures are in super contango - the distance future contract are priced well above the near term contract. The July contract is currently priced around $3.80, but the December contract is priced above $6 or more than 60% higher. Oil had the same behavior just before it bottomed and then went up for four straight months. Pay attention to this.

Although it is not getting much play so far, the most important news to come out this morning is that Russia plans to reduce its U.S. Treasury holdings. Along with China, Japan, and the Gulf Oil States, Russia is one the 4 biggest foreign holders of U.S debt. Russia says that it is not selling its U.S. bonds, but will just not replace them when they mature (you should read this as: Russia refuses to buy any more worthless U.S. debt and help us fund our deficit, so we are going to have to print even more money than we were planning). While this may sound like a minor change, it could devastating for the U.S. Dollar. Once one of the major debt holders starts bailing, there could be a stampede for the exits. Did the dollar nosedive on the news? Of course not, it actually went up afterwards. We will have to see just how long central bank intervention can forestall the market's gravitational effects.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

NEXT: Disaster Stalks the Dollar

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Inventory Report Super Bullish; Watch Silver and Gold

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Nymex oil was as high as $60.08 a barrel yesterday, another six month high. The oft quoted 'experts' are still bearish as they have been all the way up from $33 a barrel. While it has received little attention, silver has been rallying nicely and is approaching resistance around $14.40. It is likely to get sticky around that level before a breakout can take place. Gold has been trading above, but close to its 50-day moving average for the last four days and the moving average pattern is trying to become bullish. Nova gold (NG) mentioned in this blog yesterday was up 15%. It has strong resistance only 20 cents higher, so it's not likely to be at a great entry point at the moment.

Oil is a very seasonal commodity and on average the price peaks the first week of August. The peak can actually take place anywhere between June and September. If you wish to be as conservative as possible, there is at least another month left to the oil rally. There could be two or three. Points of strong resistance include $70, the high during hurricane Katrina; the $76-$78 range, which includes the 38% Fibonacci retracement of the sell off and oil's last major breakout point before it went to $147 a barrel (this combo makes this resistance area particularly formidable); and $90, which is the 50% Fibonacci retracement of the sell off. You might need a hurricane heading toward the Gulf of Mexico to get to that level on this go around.

The EIA storage report just came out and blew the bears out of the water. Oil analysts had predicted oil in U.S. storage would increase by 1.4 million barrels. Instead, oil in storage decreased by 4.7 million barrels. Gasoline supplies were supposed to be up 400,000 barrels, but dropped 4.1 million barrels. While there was an immediate market response on the upside for oil and oil companies, I suspect a bigger rally will not show up for a couple of more days (this has happened before).

It is my belief that as the stock market fades, and this should be happening within a month or so, that gold and silver will start to shine. While there are people who are predicting gold will fall to $600, there have been a number of supposed oil 'experts' that have remained bearish during the entire oil rally. You can expect the gold bears to remain vocal all the way up as well. Watch the charts if you want to know what is really going on. Moves to higher levels and breaking above resistance are bullish signs that will tell you that gold and silver want to continue to rally. For gold, 1000 is the key level and when that is broken, a significant move up should follow shortly thereafter.

NEXT: Market Pull Back or Top?

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Fed Minutes Take Oil on Roller Coaster Ride

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

It would be easy to get whiplash watching the oil market these days. The news was grim early in the morning yesterday with blaring headlines of oil falling below $48 a barrel in anticipation of a bad news oil storage report at 10:30AM. Storage however turned out to be below expectations and oil started rallying immediately. NYMEX oil got to over $51 a barrel mid-day, rising above the key breakout point around $50.50. Then late in the afternoon the minutes from the last Fed meeting were released and even though they should be taken about as seriously as a Mel Brooks movie, oil nosedived on the Fed's gloomy outlook for the economy. In the end oil was up 23 cents, closing at 49.38, though today in mid-session European trading it's above $51 again.

The price of oil was weak early Wednesday because of a report Tuesday evening from industry group, the American Petroleum Institute, that indicated there was 6.9-million-barrel build in storage.This report is not terribly reliable because it is not comprehensive and submitting data is voluntary. The government's EIA report that came out the next morning, painted a very different picture of the oil market. Oil in storage rose 1.7 million barrels, much less than the 2.3 million barrels that analysts had predicted. Distillates, which include heating oil and diesel, fell by 3.4 million barrels versus expectations of a drop of only 600,000. Gasoline demand was reported as being 0.2% below a year ago (if demand was 100 a year ago, it is now 99.8). While the drop in U.S. gasoline demand is something you would need a magnifying glass to see, the mainstream media has continually reported it as collapsing and falling off a cliff or words to that effect.

Despite the bullish tone of the storage report, oil (and most of the rest of market) sold off big time when the meetings from the Fed's March meeting were released in the late afternoon. The Fed, which didn't see the Credit Crisis coming, miscalculated it at every twist and turn, and didn't foresee the recession, is now gloomy for the next two years going forward. Sure they were wrong over and over and over again, but now they know what's going on. The minutes also indicate the Fed is worried about deflation even though it is stated in the same minutes that they are printing new money like no tomorrow. Worrying about deflation under such circumstances is like worrying about being attacked by Big Foot while walking through Central Park. The probability is somewhat less than zero.

While gasoline demand in the U.S. is flat, it should be rising in China. For the last three months cars sales in China have exceeded car sales in the U.S. Year over year, car sales are down 37% in the U.S., but up 5% in China. China is on its way to becoming the number one auto market and the number one energy user. Oil demand is shifting from North America to East Asia while the ability to produce oil is declining 6% a year by some estimates. There are even predictions out there of an oil price spike as early as later this year. While I don't necessary believe it will happen that soon, it will indeed happen as some point.

NEXT: It's Not the News, It's How the Market Reacts to the News

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil Yes, Financials No

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Suddenly, oil inventories in Cushing, Oklahoma dropped by 200,000 barrels yesterday instead of increasing by 3.5 million barrels that industry 'experts' predicted. While I have predicted that this would happen in this blog and stated so at a class given this Tuesday by the New York Investing meetup, I was a lone voice in the wilderness. Before the news came out, oil ETFs were making new lows as were many financial stocks. While superficially oil and the financials looks like major bargains, only oil should be assumed to be so.

When the 'surprise' (only a surprise to people who get their information from the mass media) news came out that oil stocks had declined, the March contract for Light Sweet Crude jumped $4.86 to close at $39.48. April, which will be the front month after today, closed at $40.18. Anecdotal reports indicate supply is drying up, but you will not see any coverage of this in the American press, other than in relationship to OPEC. For those who are unaware of it (and this presumably includes all reporters on energy topics), every oil and gas lease in the United States contains a term that the producer can stop pumping if the prices aren't high enough. Based on the behavior of the oil futures, which have jumped back to the $40 level over and over again, the market is telling us a price under $40 a barrel just isn't sustainable.

Nevertheless, the coverage in the media today is once again the same old (off-key) song. You will see quotes like, "It was a significant move last night, but there's not much out there that can create a bullish story" . And the reason for this is, "The demand outlook is very weak, and there's nothing to suggest that it will improve in the near term." There is no analysis of the supply side of the equation, despite the news out of Cushing, Oklahoma yesterday. Supply dropping faster than demand is indeed a bullish story. The same reporters who know nothing about how the oil industry functions, also seem to have forgotten to take high school economics. The current coverage of oil is an excellent example of why the average investor who gets his or her (mis)information from the mass media can't make money in the markets.

While oil had a big pop up yesterday, financials hit their lows in many cases and remained at those levels. Citigroup fell to 2.50, Wells Fargo to 11.94 and Amex to 12.74. Bank of America dropped as low as 3.86, only a tinge above its low of 3.77. Collapsing financials led the market down and helped the Dow close at a six-year low. The possibility of a Swedish style bailout of the big banks is becoming more of a reality. This would wipe out the equity holders completely (which include every major pension fund in the United States as well as Wall Street insiders) and has been resisted for that reason. While there is a risk of losing everything if you buy financial stocks, no such risk exists with oil. All commodities have a minimal price which is the cost of production. The minimal price for a troubled stock however is zero.

NEXT: Stocks/Oil Trying to Bottom, Gold at Resistance

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold and Silver Rise, Oil falls

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Gold and silver continued their climb yesterday, while oil scraped along the bottom. The prices of all three are affected by the value of the U.S. dollar and inflation. As we covered in this blog yesterday gold demand hit a record in 2008. You can assume it will hit another record in 2009. Investment buying is the main driver, with the GLD ETF increasing its holdings 200 tons in the last month alone. Demand for oil on the other hand is falling, but not by nearly as much as the press would have you believe. The supply is likely to be falling much faster sometime in the next several months. Oil is a major bargain now, just as gold and silver were last October and November.

Gold closed at 978 in the futures market yesterday and reached 986 in London trading this morning. It should soon reach its all time high just above $1000 an ounce. Expect some selling in that area, but assume it will only be temporary. The current rise in gold is taking place because of a loss in confidence in the global financial system. This is not something that can be fixed over night, it will take many years. Gold and silver will be good investments during that period as people lose faith in paper currency and see that it is continually losing its value. Once gold breaks decisively above 1000, it should move to 1200 in a very short time. The next stop after that should be around 1500. Global governments are likely to try to dampen enthusiasm at that point by announcing an IMF gold sale or engaging in some other manipulation (a chronic problem in the gold market).

Silver always follows gold and is still far from its previous high around 21. Silver closed at 14.29 in the futures market yesterday. It's recent rally has been powerful just like gold's. Silver broke through major resistance in the mid 13's like a knife slicing through hot butter. The next stop is around 16, where the resistance is even more formidable. Expect some problems in that area. Above that there is minor resistance around 19 and then the important old high of 21. Unlike gold, silver has not made a new all time high yet. The old high from 1980 is in the 50s. It will get there eventually.

While gold and silver are operating on all cylinders, oil is languishing in the mid 30s. Light sweet crude (there are many grades of oil) may have doubled bottomed at 33+, only time will tell. Fundamentally, oil is cheap especially since it is priced in U.S. dollars, which are incredibly overvalued. The alleged oversupply of oil doesn't stand up to scrutiny either. While the supply has been building up in the U.S., the price of gasoline has been rising steadily. If there is so much oil supply why isn't it used to produce gasoline, which is obviously in short supply if the price is rising? Either there is no oversupply of oil in the U.S. or some form of manipulation is going on. You can decide for yourself.

NEXT: Oil Yes, Financials No

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

All The Glitters Isn't Gold, It's Also Silver

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Commodities are priced in U.S. dollars. When the Fed began its rate cutting campaign in earnest on September 18, 2007, it became inevitable that the U.S. dollar would fall. While the value of the dollar goes up and down all the time, this time the drop would have serious consequences. The trade-weighted dollar was hoovering just above all time lows in August and would fall through multi-decade support by the end of September to reach levels never before seen. Since the dollar was hitting all time lows and commodities were priced in dollars, everything else being equal, it was reasonable to assume many commodities would subsequently be hitting all time highs. This is exactly what happened to commodities that were consumer necessities or that were currency substitutes.

The biggest price rises took place in food commodities. Wheat had already started rallying in mid-2007. Once it became clear that the Fed was beginning a new easing policy in mid August, the price of wheat on the charts started to move straight up. By the end of September its price would almost be double what it had been only three months before. Major rallies in soybeans, corn, and rice also occurred taking them to multi-decade or all time highs as well. These rallies in turn showed up in rising global food prices, up 20% for 2007 and 75% since the lows of 2000. While U.S. consumers were paying more at the supermarket just like consumers elsewhere, the Federal Reserve continued it long term policy of generally ignoring rising food (and energy) prices because they were 'volatile'. While food prices can indeed be volatile, a report by Bloomberg News found there had not been a year over year drop in food prices in the United States for at least 40 years.

Like food, energy prices were also not a part of core inflation, so the Fed tried its best to ignore them as well. U.S. consumers unfortunately did not have this option. By the end of September, oil had broken through it's all time high set in mid-2006 and headed toward a $100 a barrel, which it reached around the turn of the year. While this was a new nominal high, it was approximately only the 1980 high adjusted for (official) inflation. Interestingly, the price of gasoline at the pump did not break its 2005 post-Katrina high, when oil was only $70 a barrel, until March of 2008.

Finally, the money-substitute commodities, gold and silver, also had significant rallies. Gold broke its April 2006 high before the end of September, while silver lagged by several weeks. Gold would break its January 1980 nominal closing spot-price high in November and the all-time intraday high of $875 an ounce somewhat thereafter. Gold would reach 1000 in March 2008. Unlike oil, gold was not even near its (official) inflation-adjusted high of approximately $2200 an ounce. While percentage wise, Silver had an even bigger rally than gold, reaching $21 an ounce in March of 2008. This was not even near its approximately $50 nominal price high in January 1980, not to mention its over $130 inflation adjusted high.

For more on this topic, please see notes for the talks, "Thinking Outside the Bucks - Inflationary Investing" and "How to Profit from the Falling Dollar" at: http://invesing.meetup.com/21/files
and our video, "Commodity Investing - How to Profit From the Falling Dollar" at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG5zApWcOk0.

Next: Australian and Canadian - the Only Dollars Worth Holding

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

Please see our web site for more about our group: http://investing.meetup.com/21.