A Technical Look at Gold and Silver at the End of 2011

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

While gold and silver are in long-term secular bull markets, they have experienced price weakness in the last few months of 2011. The technical picture indicates that they are likely to remain pressured for a while longer before recovering in 2012.

GLD (the major ETF for gold)  fell below its 200-day simple moving average earlier in December and at the time, I pointed out in a previous article that this indicated lower prices in the future and it would next fall to the 325-day. After bouncing back up to the 200-day, gold did indeed fall to 148 on December 29th, which was the 325-day moving average. At the time that gold was breaking its 200-day, the DMI (directional moving indicator) also gave a sell signal on the daily charts. The RSI (relative strength index) fell below 50 and MACD (moving average convergence divergence) below the zero line -- both bearish. The sell signal on the DMI does not seem to be exhausted just yet.

The moving average picture overall still indicates that gold is in a short-term bull market. For this to turn negative, the 50-day would have to fall below the 200-day moving average and even then it shouldn't be considered as serious unless it was confirmed by a cross below the 325-day. The gives gold a lot of room to fall, even if the chart remains bullish. Even though a short rally in the beginning of 2012 is indeed possible, lower prices are likely to follow. A break of the 325-day moving average should be considered significant and would next bring GLD down to the 140 level. The 40-month simple moving average however is the most solid support below the 325-day. 

Silver shows greater weakness than gold on its charts with the selling much more advanced. Unlike gold, silver has hit new yearly lows and when this happens the first time, it is likely that a series of  new lows will then be made, although short rallies frequently take place first.  For SLV, the major silver ETF, the 50-day moving average already fell below the 200-day in October and the bearish pattern was confirmed when the 50-day then fell below the 325-day at the end of November.  On the daily charts, the DMI is on a sell signal and this seems to be only halfway done at this point. The other technical indicators are also bearish. SLV is currently being held up by support around 26. Much stronger support exists around 21 (really a band of support between 18 and 21).

The recent drops in gold and silver should be considered to be buying opportunities, although investors with a longer-term horizon should not be pushing the buy button just yet. The charts do not indicate a definitive bottom has been put in, nor that this is likely to happen in the next few weeks. Secular bull markets tend to last for around 20 years and this indicates the ultimate high for gold and silver will be around 2020. While there is always a higher high in the future during secular bulls that doesn't mean that there aren't major reversals along the way. The stock market secular bull between 1982 and 2000 had the 1987 crash, the 1989 and 1997 flash crashes, the 1990/91 bear market and the 1998 bear market. Smart investors used these declines as buying opportunities and made lots of money when they did. The same will be true for gold and silver for the rest of this decade. 

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Gold Breaks Down, Where to Look for a Bottom

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Gold fell and closed below its 200-day moving average yesterday, December 14th. This indicates a technical breakdown and the last time this happened was in August 2008. Gold bottomed approximately 30% off its high three months later in November.

Any analysis of an investment's technical state should begin with the big picture, so recent events can be put in context. Gold is in a secular (long-term) bull market which will last until approximately 2020. This means that the greater trend will move prices higher over time. No market moves straight up however. There are always reversals in a secular bull market and these are sometimes steep. The 1987 stock market crash which took the U.S. indices down 40% and some individual stocks down 70% or even 80% took place in a secular bull market that lasted between 1982 and 2000. Stock prices went to new highs after the crash despite many pundits claiming the crash meant a new depression was coming. Anyone who realized stocks were in a secular bull market could easily have predicted stocks would recover.

Even though gold has dropped below its 200-day (40-week) simple moving average, this does not indicate that it is even in a short-term bear market. At the very least the 50-day (10-week) moving average would have to fall below the 200-day to indicate that. Gold will have to trade below it's 200-day for approximately the next two weeks before that would happen. This did indeed occur in 2008, when it could be said that gold experienced a brief cyclical (short-term) bear market.  The 10-week moving average traded below the 40-week for about four months from September 2008 to January 2009. See a four-year weekly chart of the Gold ETF GLD below.

The bearish behavior of gold in latter 2008 was caused by the Credit Crisis. While you have probably heard ad nauseum that gold is a safe haven in a crisis, this does not include credit crises
(which are crises in the financial system when the banking system has difficulty functioning). We just saw that gold went down during the 2008 credit crisis and yet many gold "experts" somehow can't figure out that it should go down during the current 2011 credit crisis coming out of Europe. In our era, gold can drop during a credit crisis because central banks lease gold at low rates to the big banks and hedge funds. These entities are desperate to raise cash, so they sell the gold into the market (they can't sell many of the assets on their books). This depresses the price of gold -- temporarily. But at some point, they have to buy the gold back and return it to the central bank it was leased from. This makes the price of gold rise again. I explained the entire process in the second volume of my book "Inflation Investing", which covers gold, silver and other metals.

Gold has support at the 65-week simple moving average, but this is not the likely bottom in a full-blown credit crisis.  In order to find that, it is necessary to look at a monthly chart. It can be seen from this that the ultimate support would be at the 40-month simple moving average. Currently, this is around 120 for the gold ETF GLD. This possible buy point, which should be considered a worst-case scenario, was discussed in the October meeting of the New York Investing meetup. See the five-year monthly chart for GLD below.



It's important for investors to focus on the big picture and not get carried away with all the distractions of day to day price movements. Markets go up and down. No market goes in one direction. Every time gold drops, commentators come out of the woodwork saying it means the rally is over and deflation is taking place -- neither is true. It is the bigger price movements that have meaning and gold is in a long-term uptrend. In any secular bull market, a large drop is always a golden opportunity to buy. Just wait until there is some evidence that a bottom has been put in.  

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York
Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Are Gold and Silver Breaking Out?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Gold hit an all-time high yesterday. Silver is trying to challenge its high from March 2008. Both are inflation indicators and new highs indicate paper money is losing its value.

Spot gold came within a whisker of $1275 an ounce yesterday and was up 2% at its high. Spot silver traded around $20.54 at its peak and has so far been a bit higher today. Unlike the U.S. stock indices, both gold and silver are in secular (long-term) and cyclical (short-term) bull markets. Their recent rise was based on reports that the Federal Reserve would likely engage in more quantitative easing. The trade-weighted dollar (ETF: DXY) dropped significantly on the news and fell below its 200-day simple moving average. The dollar has been in a secular bear market for many years and usually moves in the opposite direction of the precious metals.

The technical indicators for gold (ETF: GLD) are somewhat overbought and look like they are losing strength. Silver (ETF: SLV), is more clearly overbought than gold, but the technicals look better overall. In strong bull markets, rallies can continue on weakening technicals however. News, as is always the case, can override all other considerations - although it will have to be news about liquidity and central bank money pumping and money printing.

As I have stated many times, there is already a lot of liquidity flowing into U.S. stocks and other investment markets in the last few months. Prices for almost all assets are rising because of this. Stocks continually went up on bad economic news during the summer and while some incorrectly interpret this to mean that the market is forecasting a better economy, this is wishful thinking. Look inside a number of economic reports and you will notice that rising prices are an important reason they don't look worse. The mainstream media does not report this however because the Federal Reserve keeps telling them that 'there is no inflation'. Apparently though, the Fed forgot to inform the gold and silver markets. Perhaps they should get a memo out right away and put 'rush delivery' on it.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

One Way to Tell if We Are in a Bear Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Bull markets usually go up the first four trading days of the month. After giving a strong negative signal in May, investors should be watching this indicator in the early days of June. A second negative signal would be a confirmation that a new bear market has begun.

Money tends to get reallocated at the beginning of the month. The behavior is more pronounced at the beginning of the quarter and most pronounced at the beginning of the year. In bull markets, much of this money gets allocated on the buy side for stocks. In bears markets, a higher percentage of investing money will go to safe haven assets. So in a bull market the first four trading days (not five as many sources claim) of the month tend to see a nice rise in stock prices. The first couple of days are almost always positive.

Even in strong bull markets, not every month has to have an up move in the beginning days. Every so many months, investors are likely to grow cautious and take some profits. The bulls should regain control for the next several months however before profits get high enough again so that investors want to take some money off the table. So far, the rally that began in March 2009 has managed to just hold together.

The first negative signal for the rally was given in July 2009 for the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The next month was positive though and then another negative signal was given in early September. This was followed by a number of months that when stocks were up in the first four days. Then February 2010 gave another negative signal. March and April were once again OK and then came May.  The flash crash happened on the fourth trading day of May and the market was already down before it occurred. May was an ugly month.

Four negative signals on the first four trading days of the month indicator are a lot in just over a year. It indicates a rally that has weak underpinnings (as does the falling volume on the Dow during most of the rally). We still have not as of yet seen negative signals two months in a row. Maybe we will by June 4th.  If we do, it would be strong evidence that a new bear market has begun.

Disclosure: None.

Daryl Montgomery Organizer,
New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Silver Breaks Out of Trading Range

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Precious metals had a spectacular rally on Monday. While spot gold was up 1.9% on the day and hit another all time high at $1140.80, spot silver and palladium were the stars, rising 5.6% and 5.7% respectively (platinum was up 4.2%). At more than one point silver was up over a dollar and ended trading at 5:15PM New York time up 98 cents to close at $18.42. Silver has been stuck in a trading range between $16 and $18 since September and this was the first decisive break and first close above that range. Trading volume on the EFT SLV was approximately double normal levels and was highly supportive of the move up.

Now that silver has made its move higher, the spot price needs to stay above $17.70 (the low for the day) to maintain the breakout. The reason silver was stuck at the $16 to $18 level was because of a band of resistance at those prices established in March to July 2008. There is a further resistance point around $19.00 that still needs to be taken out. After that, a test of the 2008 high just under $21 will be possible. Some more consolidation should be expected around those levels and this is likely to take place in December. Silver and gold are seasonally strong in the early part of the year though and tend to form intermediate tops in March or April, so a move to the $25 area, long-term resistance from the late 1970s, is a target price for silver next spring.

As the precious metals continue to rise, you will hear more and more talk about a bubble. Ignore it. One well-known market guru said gold was in a bubble just yesterday. While gold and silver will eventually be in a bubble, this is a long way off. They are in bull markets. The two should not be confused. The simplest way to distinguish the two is by the price patterns and extent of the rallies. Bubbles have spectacular price rises that have been preceded by long multi-year continual rallies. Silver had a price collapse from almost $21 to under $9 in 2008. It is rallying up from the bottom. This is not a bubble pattern. Gold is up 53% off of its bottom from last year. When it was in a bubble at the end of the 1970s, it went up 400% the last year. Silver was up 1000%. When you see price rises like those in a single year, that is when you need to worry about a bubble. Until then, the trend is your friend.

The other nonsense floating around the media concerning the precious metals is they are not at inflation-adjusted highs and this is somehow a negative. Is it really? The same could have been said about U.S. stocks in the 1980s. Stocks had a major rally from those levels until they reached their inflation adjusted highs in the 1990s. Then, stocks had an even bigger rally after they reached this level. When an asset isn't trading at its inflation-adjusted high, this is a reason to invest in it because it means big profits can be made. Gold and silver have been reminding us of this almost every day lately.

Disclosure: Long gold and silver.

NEXT: U.S. Inflation Reports - Contradictions and Absurdity

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

A Break in the Bull and China Stops Shopping

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

August has not been a good month for Chinese stocks. In mid-month, the markets were down 20%, but some recovery took place and it looked like the bull market which had moved stocks up 80% or more was holding. The month ended badly last night though. After dropping 3% on Friday, Shanghai was down 6.7% and Shenzhen down 7.1% last night. Volatility, and Chinese stocks have certainly been volatile in August, is classic sign of a bubble top. The market's plunge last night took place because of concern about a drop in bank lending. Like every other major government in the world, China has been pumping massive stimulus into the economy. Even the threat that the stimulus might be reduced is enough to tank the markets. What would happen if it actually was reduced?

There was no China contagion in the other Asian markets last night. They all had relatively minor drops. The Nikkei in Japan was even up strongly in the morning, but closed down slightly.
Initial bullishness was because of the election news. The ruling party, which has been in power almost continuously since 1955, was crushed at the polls. After approximately half a dozen recessions in the last 19 years, the Japanese electorate finally became fed up enough to try something else. The U.S. electorate is not likely to be so understanding for so long.

There are lessons for what has just happened in Japan for the U.S. Japan has been producing much better economic statistics lately. GDP turned strongly positive last quarter. Industrial production figures out last night were up for the fifth month in a row. Exports have been rising (thanks mostly to China - anything happens to the Chinese economy and the GDP will go right back in the tank in a number of countries). The real estate market turn up last year (after a 15 year drop) Despite the 'improving economy' unemployment is up and retail sales are very weak. The average Japanese citizen sees his or her personal situation deteriorating. Based on how the vote went, they obviously no longer believe the government's upbeat reports on the economy.

The picture in the U.S. right now is remarkably similar to Japan's. Economists predict 3% U.S. GDP growth this quarter. Industrial production is up. Real estate prices are supposedly going up (well, that's the claim at least). Exports are supposedly doing better. However, just like in Japan, unemployment is up and retail sales are in bad shape. The economy the average person sees is deteriorating. Without massive government stimulus, it would look like the 1930s depression. Government stimulus was also the key component in improving the Japanese economy, as has been the case over and over again since 1990. Keeping the U.S. economy out of recession, will require ongoing stimulus as well and in our case this means massive money printing. When governments are forced to chose between recession and inflation, inflation always wins out. No government can risk ongoing recession and survive - even in Japan apparently.

NEXT: Next Five Days Critical for Stock Rally

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

So Far This Doesn't Look Like a Top

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The S&P 500 broke through its 200-day moving average yesterday following the Nasdaq's successful breakout last week. The Dow only managed to pierce this line and then it bounced down. If all the averages can break through and hold above the 200, this rally will continue to have legs. The next key test will be if the 50-day moving averages can cross the 200 days. This is the classical confirmation that a bull market has begun. This is at least a couple of weeks off. A failed cross of the 50-day is not out of the question, so we will have to wait and see. Oil continued its impressive rally yesterday, rising for the 6th day in the row. Rallies like the one we are currently seeing should make you start to think of selling if you got in at the bottom. It all depends on the technical picture of course and your investing time horizon.

I sold Nova Gold (NG) this morning because it had gone up too far, too fast. The price was way above the 10-day moving average (use 20% above as a rule of thumb for overextension) and the RSI had gone above 80 on the daily charts and had stayed at the level for several days (this is mega-bullish blow off behavior and is not sustainable). On the other hand, Harry Winston (HWD) just broke and closed above its 200-day moving average yesterday, which indicates a likely continuation of its bullish pattern. It is not overextended from its 10-day, so I am willing to keep it for the moment.

Many oil stocks are getting overdone however. The rally which has taken place since the beginning of last week has taken oil up quite a bit in a short period of time. At this point, it looks like the resistance around 70 could cause a temporary sell off before a further rise to the 75-78 area. I might be taking some profits today or Wednesday morning with the intention of buying back lower. For investors who can't pay attention to the market closely, it is best to leave well enough alone until oil gets into the mid 70s. Even then, I think higher highs will be in store for oil during the summer.

One thing I have been accumulating is Natural Gas (UNG). Gas can rally into the October/ November time frame and there is potentially a lot of profit to be made there, since it is barely off of its bottom. I have held onto all of my silver, which is around its resistance of 16 today. Gold is pushing for the key 1000 level. I have no intention of selling any of it until the breakout and move up to around 1200 level. Watch the trade-weighted dollar. It is in the high 78's right now and a breakdown below 78 will be bullish for all commodities and will definitely set off the gold rally.

NEXT: Market at Key Juncture

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

GM Bankruptcy End of an Era; Oil Rally Continues

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

GM will declare bankruptcy this morning, striking a major blow to the prestige of American manufacturing. This is one more step, and a major one at that, in the end of the economic dominance of the U.S. In the future, historians will look back and cite this as a key event that represented a turning point and a significant failure in U.S. policy. GM is the largest industrial bankruptcy in American history. The new 'improved' GM that emerges from bankruptcy will be a socialized company with the federal government owning 60%. The government will be paying for its stake with $30 billion of newly printed money under the TARP program.

GM's bankruptcy is not an isolated event, but will be taking down a host of associated companies and this will have ripple effects throughout the economy. Two parts suppliers already filed for bankruptcy on Friday. The first major dealership, Chevrolet-Saturn, of Harlem, declared bankruptcy this morning, expect many more to follow. The problems are not limited to the U.S. either. There are apparently over 100 Japanese companies that have significant exposure to GM. There could be quite a few in other countries as well (I am sure they will all be delighted to do business with U.S. manufacturing firms in the future). The company will cut 21,000 employees or 34% of its work force during a time of rapidly rising unemployment, reduce dealerships by 2600 and close 11 manufacturing facilities.

Markets in Asia last night and Europe this morning were rallying. U.S. stock futures are up a the moment in the pre-market. Oil broke over $68 a barrel last night, breaking through resistance at 67. It was recently trading at 67.69 in mid-morning European trading. Once oil can hold above 67, the next stop is chart resistance at 70, which was the top during hurricane Katrina. Gold was as high as 988 and silver was in the 15.80s pre-market, both close to major breakout points. Silver is overextended on the technicals however, so it should have trouble getting to and staying above 16 at the moment. The trade-weighted U.S. dollar was priced at 78.79 this morning and is in danger of a major breakdown. There should be at attempt on the part of the authorities to try to save it, which might work for awhile and cause a temporary pause in the rise of gold and silver. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Markets which are bullish tend to go up the first few trading days of the month (and down when they are they are bearish). While oil, gold and silver look like they are in good shape, so do stocks for the moment. Nasdaq traded convincingly above its 200-day moving average four days last week (as this blog predicted it would). The Dow and S&P are both about to hit this line though and this will lead to stickiness at the very least. A failure of the stock rally is possible at this point, but that is by no means definite. The next week or two will be a key period for all markets which should tell us a lot.

NEXT: So Far This Doesn't Look Like a Top

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Bull Markets Climb a Wall of Worry

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

An old market adage from the 1800s is that bull markets climb a wall of worry. At almost every step of the way (except at the end), there is substantial hand wringing about stocks being over priced, overbought, overextended and ahead of themselves. You will hear and read over and over again how current prices are not justified and the rally has gone way too far. Despite all the numerous reasons cited, most of which seem quite reasonable, stock prices continue to go up and up. Based on these criteria, we are currently in major bull market.

This type of opinion for stocks has been pervasive in the mainstream financial media from almost the beginning of the current rally (the oil market is even worse, with a constant barrage of negative headlines and news of impending price collapses that are supposedly going to take place any moment). It has however reached new heights in this rally with the CEO of NYSE Euronext giving a public interview stating the current rally is likely to run out of steam and stocks return to their previous lows. Considering the NYSE Euronext makes its money on the amount of trading that takes place, widely publicized comments from its CEO to talk down the market and discourage people from trading are a bit curious to say the least. There is definitely more to this story than meets the eye.

As we pointed out in the blog a few days ago, the big money in rallies like the current one is made by buying very low-priced stocks with good fundamentals. A case in point would be diamond company Harry Winston (HWD). While the media was telling you to stay out of the market, you could have almost doubled you money in this stock in less than two weeks. The stock is indeed now overextended, but should offer some opportunity for buying it on a drop later next week or even earlier the following week. While oil the commodity is moving sideways, a number of oil stocks are moving up. We mentioned in this blog drillers was the place to look, one the best deals seems to be Precision Drillers (PDS). A few shippers, also mentioned here as a place to look, have had explosive rallies in the last couple of days.

If you have a longer term perspective, media coverage can actually be very helpful. Just look for stocks that they are bashing. One of the best examples I have ever seen of this was in an article published in yesterday's IBD ("Bottom Fishing Can Land a Smelly Catch"). While every point made in this article applies to HWD (try to find an IBD stock that went up a 100% in the last two weeks - don't bother looking, there aren't any), the article is actually about MEMC Electronics (WFR). While most of the article bashes WFR as one of the worst stocks in the world, a careful reader would note that WFR had similar problems in 2001 to those that it has today and it was selling as low as $1.05 at that time. Within 6 years, WFR went up to $96.08. So you could have made 95 times (or 9500%) your investment by buying the stock when things looked worse. But don't worry, IBD is doing its best to make sure you don't fall into that trap again!

NEXT: Nasdaq Confirms Double Bottom - 200 MA Next

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Rallies Make You Rich, No Matter What the Type

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

While the major indices were flat yesterday a lot was going on below the surface in the market. Oil went on another incredible roller coaster ride, opening way down, getting close to even and then closing with smaller losses. It's back above the breakout point again in European trading this morning. A lot of small cap stocks, including some oil and gas drillers and producers, had major rallies yesterday however. In fact, the beaten down inexpensive under $5 stocks - the ones that almost every financial advisor tells you categorically to avoid are the stars of this rally. This is nothing new, its always the case in short-covering, technically based rallies.

Oil is repeating the behavior pattern at $50 that took place when it traded around $40. It went above $40 and was driven back below it over and over again. The oil "experts" were repeatedly quoted in the media that a price over $40 couldn't be justified. Oil would then go below $40 and would shortly thereafter bounce right back above it. It then shot up to $45, which the "experts" said was too high. It then promptly went to $50. Yesterday was the 4th time light sweet crude was driven below the key $50.50 breakout point. This morning in European trading it shot back above it. The market has continually shown that the oil "experts" the mainstream media quotes are wrong. Nothing succeeds like failure in financial media coverage however (much like in Washington, D.C.). The media seems to seek out "experts" who have never made a correct prediction in their entire careers.

The "experts" will also tell you not to buy stocks under $5 and stocks that have had huge price drops because they are unsafe. Better to stick with 'sure things' like Enron and those Bernie Madoff funds instead. When the market has has a major drop, buying low-priced, beaten down stocks are the key to making the most money in the rally that follows. Just make sure the company is financially viable - a current ratio around 2.0 and positive operating cash flow are the signs the company is likely to continue its operations. Low or no debt is even better, but not necessary. Running out of cash and failure to make debt payments is what drives companies into bankruptcy. On a fundamental basis, you can find a number of low-priced stocks that have very low price earnings ratios, price to book values well below one and even with price cash flow ratios below one (the price is below the amount of cash generated for the most recent year). There are also stocks with real dividends above 20%. These stocks are major bargains by any criteria. Oil and gas, coal (even in its bright, shiny form), and shipping are the richest source of these stocks. There are a few bargains in technology as well.

Yet is the mainstream media telling you to buy, buy, buy? Not at all. It is filling you with fear and telling you this is a suckers rally. Every rally is actually a suckers rally however. In a bull market, the suckers are the people who buy and then hold. In a bear market, its the people who sit on the sidelines and don't buy at the bottom or close to the bottom or even after the market is off the bottom because the financial media is warning them about losing money. If you are doing this, just remember every major financial publication had nice things to say about Enron. How much money do you think you'll make if you follow the investment advice of those people?

NEXT: The Deflation Boogieman, Oil and Intel

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

It's Not the News, It's How the Market Reacts to the News

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

At the moment, world stock markets are acting more like bull markets than bear markets. In a bear market all news is bad and in a bull market all news is good. There is still plenty of really bad news out there about the economy and corporate earnings - and the media is flooding the airwaves and using a lot of ink on stories of bad news, more bad news and still more bad news. The average investor will act like a deer caught in the headlights frozen in inaction. Meanwhile stock prices keep going up and up because professional traders are buying. What the market does is the only thing you should pay attention to. If any of the reporters writing these stories actually knew anything about making money in the stock market, they would be successful traders making a hundred times more money than they do as reporters.

Last week Alcoa (AA) offered a perfect example of the bull market reaction to news. Earnings were not just bad as everyone thought they would be, but were even worse than expected by 3 to 5 cents (depending on which analyst survey you looked at). The stock actually opened up the next morning and then settled down for a small loss on the day. I had sold out my position (purchased off the bottom) in anticipation the earnings would be worse than expected. However, since the market obviously didn't care about that, I bought the stock right back the next day (at the market, I don't take the risk of not getting a good bargain by setting limit orders). Alcoa then had a big rally on Thursday. When a stock goes up like this on bad news, it indicates all the bad news has already been priced in. When that happens the price can only go up. You didn't read about that in the mainstream press however. All you saw was negative coverage of how poor the aluminum business was last quarter even though the market couldn't care less what happened last quarter.

As we detailed in last weeks meeting, the press has been not just irrelevant when it comes to the coverage of the oil market, but out and out misleading about the actual state of affairs. The oil bears have managed to drive the price of light sweet crude below the 50.50 breakout point 3 times so far. I have bought more oil related stocks at each point (Recently I started purchasing drillers which are usually the last to rally). Nymex oil closed the trading week at $52.24 on Thursday. The media is doing its best again today to highlight the negative view on oil. The IEA, International Energy Agency, is now predicting that global oil demand will fall 2.4 million barrels a day this year. Media stories didn't mention any statements from the agency concerning predictions on supply (which is falling rapidly). Meanwhile Iran's oil minister, a source that would not have any credibility with U.S. readers, released a statement that the price of oil should go to $75 to $80 a barrel and the media highlighted this. In response, renowned oil "expert" Victor Shum, a source that should have no credibility with U.S. readers, said, "nobody, even in OPEC, expects the price [of oil] to get to $75 this year". Obviously, Mr Shum doesn't follow the New York Investing meetup. If he did, he might improve the accuracy of his forecasts.

People don't make money in the stock market because they focus on the irrelevant - and the mainstream media is more than willing to help you do this. Pay attention to what the market is actually doing if you goal is to make money investing. Then you need to take action. If a consumer goes shopping and sees an incredible bargain at 90% off, they don't usually say I'll come back next week to see if its 95% off or I'll come back and get it in a couple of hours when I'm done with my shopping (lots of luck that it will still be there). People do this with stocks all the time though and this is one of the major reasons the average person has trouble making money investing.

NEXT: Rallies Make You Rich, No Matter What the Type

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

In the Eye of the Financial Hurricane

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

There is some effort to talk down the current rally by the media today (assume the shorts have planted the stories). This doesn't mean the rally is going to end at the moment however. The momentum is very strong and doesn't seem to be have been dissipated yet, so no need to rush out and sell anything. The rally will end however and be followed by a sharp drop, possibly to lower lows. The current rally is very much a Bear Market rally and these differ in a number of ways from the beginning of a new Bull Market.

The money has been very easy in this rally and that is a common marker of Bear Market rallies. Prices move up very fast and seemingly without restraint. In contrast, beginnings of new Bull Markets are usually a struggle. It took about 10 months to put in the base at the bottom in 2002 and 2003 (the current bottom has had about a 5 month base put in so far). The market did not just shoot straight up out of that base. The bulls and bears battled for control on almost a daily basis with the bulls being able to only gradually move the market up. That type of constant give and take allows rallies to last a long time - about 10 months in 2003/2004. The current move up is almost effortless and because of that it can burn itself out pretty quickly.

The current rally has also been led by the biggest losers of the downturn - the financials. This is typical of bear market rallies, which are mostly short covering affairs. Once enough of the shorts close out and prices rise a lot, new short positions are put on that drive prices back down. The only thing that has made the financials more valuable is that the government is willing to put more taxpayer money into their coffers. Their value is no longer determined by economic forces, but corporate welfare payments. Not exactly an enticing long term economic model for investors.

There are three things for the current rally that need to be watched closely - resistance, earnings season, and April 15th. All the major indices are about to enter a strong band of resistance. For the Nasdaq, this starts at 1600 and goes to around 1650. The Dow has strong resistance at 8300, with with more resistance around 9000. For the S&P 500, there is resistance between 870 to 940. These are levels where the rally is likely to run out of steam. Another limiting factor to the rally is that first quarter earnings season starts around April 7th. Rallies into earnings usually mean a sell off after - and sometimes even during. As for April 15th, people frequently sell investments to pay their taxes and the market tends to dip then for that reason (although the dip can be temporary). So in figuring out when to sell, watch resistance and watch the calendar.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Mega Move Up in Gold and Silver

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our video related to this posting:

It looks likes gold and silver had their biggest one day move up in history, both in absolute and percentage terms, on Wednesday . The price run up looks even bigger than the one that took place the day the previous commodities bubble peaked in 1980. The underlying picture between then and now is quite different however. While the move in 1980 indicated the end of a major rally, the move yesterday indicates the beginning of a new one.

In 1979 and into the beginning of 1980, gold and silver prices were going straight up in what is termed a blow off top. A huge move up, similar to what took place yesterday, ended the rally and the secular bull market that had been in place for the previous decade. What had preceded yesterday's rally was six months of selling for gold and silver, not buying. From high to low, gold was down 29% and silver 52%. Both had hit major areas of support - 738 for gold and 10 to 11 for silver. Gold then moved up 11.3% (or $90) and silver moved up 14.4% (or about $1.50) from the previous day. The gold miners index, the GDX was up 11.7%. These moves took place on high volume, more than triple the average for the GLD ETF and more than double for the SLV ETF, confirming the bullish picture.

The bullishness was furthermore limited to gold, silver and to a lesser extent oil (up 6.6%) and food commodities (up about 3%) . It was not part of an overall commodities rally, copper was actually down on the day, nor even a precious metals rally. Platinum was up 1.7% and palladium up only 0.5%. This rally was massive short-covering linked to increased inflation expectations and pessimism about the future of the U.S. dollar. The trade-weighted dollar fell 1.4% - a huge one-day move for a major currency. The hyper response of gold and silver to this drop indicates that much of the previous selling had been short selling and not traders dumping their positions as has been repeatedly reported in the media.

While panic buying was hitting the gold and silver market, panic selling was taking place in stocks. All of the major U.S. indices almost hit the mini-crash level of down 5%. Nasdaq came closest with a 4.9% drop on volume 50% greater than average. The Dow had a lesser drop at 4.1%, but it took place on double average volume. The S&P was down 4.7%. Since August 2007, whenever the U.S. stock market has started falling apart, the Fed has come in with some sort of major liquidity injection to prop it up. By last night one of the biggest liquidity injections ever, involving most of the world's major central banks, had been arranged. What a surprise!

NEXT: Central Bank Liquidity Tsunami Returns

Daryl Montgomery

Organizer, New York Investing meetup

http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Inflation Versus Deflation Argument - Part 5

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

If the deflationists aren't really discussing consumer price inflation, what is it that they are really talking about? To figure this out, it is helpful to seperately analyze the two components of the deflationist argument, bank credit and money supply, since they operate in very different ways and combining them obfuscates the picture.

Since people don't take out a bank loan to buy a quart of milk or a tank of gas, but they do borrow to buy a house and financial instruments, there is a direct relationship between bank credit and asset prices. The effects of increases or decreases in bank credit are likely to show up relatively quickly in prices for real estate, bonds, and stocks. Only much lately are they likely to impact consumer prices and even then they will represent only one of many components (currency exchange rates being potentially far more important).

This proposed direct relationships between credit and asset prices and currency and consumer prices seems to be well supported by real world observations. In the late 1920s U.S. there was a massive increase in credit and strong bull markets in housing, stocks, and bonds, yet consumer prices were dropping. Even though the U.S. currency didn't float at the time, capital was flowing into the New York from around the world and if the value of the dollar had been market driven, it's exchange rate would have been rising. A similar picture exists for Japan in the 1980s, although there was an even more massive asset bubble and the Yen was experiencing a far more significant rise that the U.S. dollar would have had in the 1920s.

In contrast, the U.S. in the 2000s was a period of declining currency values, the dollar peaked in 2002 and lost more than a third of its value by 2008. Bank credit expansion during this period led to massive bubbles in real estate and related debt instruments, with the S&P testing its 2000 bubble high in late 2007. When bank credit began its severe retraction, prices for real estate, non-government bonds, and stocks had significant drops. Consumer prices on the other hand accelerated higher. One major reason was the rising price in commodities. Since commodities are priced in dollars, they will go up if the U.S. dollar goes down.

The other component of the deflationist argument, money supply, has an obvious lagged effect on consumer prices. Changes can show up many years later. An examination of a money supply chart from the 1970s illustrates this quite clearly. M3 growth peaked in 1971, yet U.S. consumer price inflation didn't have an intermediate term peak until 1974 and the final high wasn't reached until 1980. The large rise in M3 in 2008 isn't likely to have its full impact on consumer inflation until some time in the 2010s.

Since deflation inevitably follows serious inflation, the deflationists at some point will be correct that there will be deflation in the United States. Worrying about deflation now though is like closing your windows and turning up your heat in May because you are worried about a cold winter coming.

For notes related to this talk, please see, 'Inflation vs Deflation Argument' at:http://investing.meetup.com/21/Files

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

For more about us, please see our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21

Gold, Silver, Oil, and Stocks - Spring 2008

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Please see our video related to this entry: Gold, Silver and Oil - March 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVpcdxh1Jv8


Gold and silver both had price lows in mid-August of 2007, with gold around $640 an ounce and silver just under $11. Both started a long rally just as the U.S. Federal Reserve began it's rate lowering campaign by dropping the discount rate on August 17th. Rallies in gold and silver indicate that the Fed has set interest rates too low and its interest rate policy is inflationary. Gold and silver both did indeed rally during almost the entire period when the Fed lowered rates sending a clear message about the inflationary implications of the Fed's actions (clear to almost everyone but the Fed that is).

Since the Fed was in a race against time to prevent a recession in a presidential election year and it takes about six months for a Fed rate cut to have full impact on the economy, it was quite predictable that the Fed would be finished lowering rates by March 2008 (only one additional quarter point drop took place after that) and the gold and silver rally might end (temporarily) around that time.

Gold and silver both peaked at the time of the Fed's March meeting and began selling off immediately thereafter. Gold had psychological resistance at $1000 an ounce (a nice round number that many traders were looking for it to reach and where they planned to sell once it did). It hoovered around this level for several days and actually reached 1033 in overnight trading before the selling began. Silver, like gold, was technically overbought and even more overextended on the charts making it even more vulnerable to a sell off. Both gold and silver dropped sharply. Within only 3 days, silver lost 20% of its value.

Oil (Nymex light-sweet crude) followed a different pattern from the precious metals. It had psychological resistance at 100 and got stuck around this level in November and December of 2007. It finally broke through the 100 level in February 2008 and rallied into July until it got just over $147. While oil was rallying, gold and silver sold down in a choppy fashion until they
hit a price low in the beginning of May.

The notes for our talks on this subject can be found at: http://investing.meetup.com/21/files
1. Gold, Oil, Silver, and Stocks - March 2008
2. Gold, Silver, and Oil - April 2008

NEXT: The Inflation Versus Deflation Argument - Part I

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please see our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21

The First Four Trading Days of 2008

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

In the January 2008 meeting of the New York Investing meetup an analysis of the first four trading days of the year was done (to see the video for this talk please go to : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAobjg2wSkQ). Numerous research studies have shown that what happens in the market during this time gives a good indication of the direction of the market for the year as a whole. The reason this indicator works is that major reallocations of investments are made in the beginning of the year, so drops or gains indicate what sectors of the market people are taking money out of and what sectors they are putting money into.

Things didn't look good for U.S. stock market performance in 2008 based on this indicator. The Dow Jones had the second biggest drop (percentage wise) ever on the first trading day. The only bigger drop was in 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression. The Japanese market performed even worse than the American market, having the largest first day drop ever. The Dow didn't just fall the first day, but was down significantly for the first four trading days. The same was the case for the S&P 500, the Nasdaq, and the Russell 2000. The signal was clearly and strongly negative for U.S. stocks.

While stocks looked like they would be falling for the year and the classic bear market trading patterns were forming (the 200-day moving average moving down and the 50-day moving average trading below it) for them, some commodities were looking very bullish. Examination of the trading of the gold, silver and oil ETFs indicated an almost mirror image pattern of the trading in U.S. stocks. GLD, SLV and USO went up during the first four trading days, indicating gains for the year.

The less than invisible hand of the Federal Reserve was noted in early year stock trading as well. On the third trading day, U.S. stocks were having a big sell off and as it had done many times previously, the Fed made an announcement of a new liquidity injection in order to turn the market around. While such manipulation can work in the short-term, it was pointed out that this would eventually fail and not protect the market from further drops.

NEXT: Muriel Siebert Discusses the Credit Crisis

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please go to our web site: http://investing.meetup.com/21

Australian and Canadian - the Only Dollars Worth Holding

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

By the November 14, 2007 meeting of the New York Investing meetup, deterioration of the U.S. dollar had become pronounced. The trade-weighted dollar had fallen further through its long-term support level and hit a series of new all time lows. Not surprisingly, the euro hit a series of new highs reaching an exchange rate of 1.47 to the dollar. The rallies in the Australian and Canadian dollars (both economies are based on food and commodity production) were even stronger however. At one point, it had taken approximately two Australian dollars to get one U.S. dollar, by November of 2007 only around 1.1 Australian dollars were necessary to get an American dollar. In the early 2000s, one U.S. dollar got you 1.61 Canadian dollars, but by November you would only get 91 Canadian cents.

There were two talks that month at New York Investing that dealt with what was going on in the currency market and the implications for investing, "Investing Like It's 1979" and "How to Profit from the Falling Dollar" (see http://investing.meetup.com/21/files). Currency movement don't exist in a vacuum of course, but affects the price of commodities because they are priced in U.S. dollars. By November 2007, Oil had gotten to $97 a barrel making a series of all time highs, although it first broke its nominal 1980 high of $39.50 a barrel in 2004. While oil was a leader in reacting to the value of a declining U.S. dollar (the dollar had been falling since 2002), gold's reactions were more coincident to changes in the American currency. Gold had reached $848 an ounce getting close to its nominal intraday high of $875 in 1980, but not enough to establish a new record. Of the three inflation-related commodities, silver was by far the laggard, reaching only $16 plus and ounce, not even near its $50 an ounce high from 27 years earlier.

The specifics of how to invest in currencies and commodities, such as ETFs (exchange traded funds) and foreign currency denominated CDs and accounts were not only handled in the talk, "How to Profit from the Falling Dollar", but in three videos produced by the New York Investing meetup. These videos represented an investing blueprint for the average investor on how to handle the new inflationary environment the Federal Reserve had created. Please see these video for more on this topic:

Currencies I – How to Profit From the Falling Dollar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTImG1dWT4k

Currencies II – How to Profit From the Falling Dollar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhfwatOCx_k

Commodity Investing – How to Profit From the Falling Dollar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG5zApWcOk0

Next: Sub-prime Housing Leads to Sub-prime Financial Institutions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please go to: http://investing.meetup.com/21