Dollar Clears Resistance as Euro Falls Below Support

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

As the U.S. trade-weighted dollar (DXY) breaks out from a four month consolidation pattern, the euro (FXE) is falling below major support. The movements of these currencies have important implications for the rest of the market.

The dollar has been stuck trading roughly between 79 and 82 since January. There is strong chart resistance at these levels both from recent times and two decades ago. In the last couple of years, the dollar made a double top at just under 82 in late 2010 and early 2011. In the late 1980s and early 1990s the dollar made a triple bottom at three different points in this year's trading range. The dollar finally broke above 82 on May 23rd. While there is minor resistance just under 84, major resistance is from 88 to 89 — the highs during the Credit Crisis in late 2008 and early 2009 and in mid-2010 during the first phase of the Greek debt crisis. It should be assumed the dollar will get to that level again (and possibly higher). How long it takes to do so is still an open question.

As is almost always the case, the euro is moving opposite to the dollar. The euro has strong support at and just above 125. It made a double bottom at this level while the dollar was peaking during the Credit Crisis. Recently in January, it made another low at this level. There was a clear break below on May 24th. Next stop for the euro is the low around 119 established in June 2010 when the dollar was just above 88. If the euro breaks this support, it will try to head toward parity with the dollar. The powers that be will of course do everything possible to try to prevent this.

The commodity markets are heavily influenced by the dollar/euro price actions. All commodities are priced in dollars, so a rising dollar will lower commodity prices all else being equal. Oil (USO) and gold (GLD, IAU) are generally at the forefront of this price dampening. This is one reason spot gold was down 30% during the Credit Crisis, despite its safe-haven status. WTI Oil dropped almost 80% at the same time. Stocks of the commodity producers usually fall even more than the commodity itself. Multinational stocks in general are also negatively impacted by a rising dollar because their earnings are mostly made in other currencies.

Since large moves in major currencies are destabilizing, central bankers are always concerned when they happen. They will continue to do everything possible to prop up the euro, although the currency union cannot continue to exist in its current incarnation. There is a long history of governments trying to prop up weakened currencies however and while devaluations can be delayed, they can't be avoided altogether.  

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

S&P 500 Joins Global Bear Market

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Markets opened October with almost all assets declining everywhere. The S&P 500 entered bear territory on Tuesday.  Few assets other than treasuries and the U.S. dollar are doing well, as is typical during a credit crisis.

The big talk on Monday, the first trading day of October, was about the S&P 500 making a new closing low for the year. The intraday low was only slightly lower than the previous one in early August, so peak to trough the index was off 19.8%. The big drop on the opening on Tuesday created a 20% loss, putting the S&P 500 officially in a bear market.

The small cap Russell 2000 already entered bear territory on August 8th. The Russell had another mini-crash on Monday, dropping 5.4% on the day. That was its fourth mini-crash since August. Mini-crashes are common during credit crises, but not at other times.

The selling on Tuesday first showed up in Asia with the Hang Seng in Hong Kong losing 3.4% to close at 16,250 and South Korea's KOPSI dropping 3.6%.  The ugliness then spread to Europe with the German DAX, the French CAC-40 and the UK FTSE down more than 3% during the  trading day. U.S. stocks opened then opened lower with the Dow losing more than 200 points in early trading.

As usual in Europe, banks were at the epicenter of the market quake. Franco-Belgium bank Dexia was down 22% at one point. Deutsche Bank (DB) was down more than 6% in Frankfurt after announcing it would miss its profit target for the current year.  American banks have not avoided the carnage affecting financial stocks elsewhere; just take a look at Bank of America (BAC) and Morgan Stanley (MS), both trading at two-year lows.

While the behavior of banking stocks makes it clear that a credit crisis is taking place, falling commodity prices clearly indicate that the global economy is turning down. Copper prices fell as low as $3.01 a pound early Tuesday. Copper sold for well over $4.00 at its high in February and dropped sharply throughout September. Oil is also indicating weakness, with WTI crude closing at $77.61 on Monday. It traded as low as the $75 range on Tuesday. Oil is heading into a period of seasonal weakness and this is likely to exaggerate any price drops. Next strong support is around $70 a barrel.

Money continues to move into safe haven treasuries. The 10-year yield was as low as 1.725 before selling began in the bond market. The U.S. dollar index traded just under 80 at its high. The euro, which moves opposite to the dollar, hit a low of 1.31.62 Tuesday. Further weakness should be expected until there is some resolution to the debt crises in the EU.

 In bear markets, the bigger trend is down, but this is frequently accompanied by huge volatility. This is what has taken place since August and until there is a good reason that the trend should change, investors should expect that prices will be moving lower.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Traders Should Watch the Gap

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Anyone who rides a commuter rail in the United States is probably used to hearing a message to 'watch the gap'. The advice also holds for stock trading.

A gap is a price level on a chart where no trading took place from one time unit to the next time unit. This happens on daily charts when the opening price is above or below the previous closing price and the market continues to trade in the direction of the gap. Gaps in the stock market on the daily charts invariably show up on Nasdaq because all stocks open at a price determined by market conditions. Specialists try to balance the buys and sells on the NYSE and this can delay the opening of stocks there and smooth out the price. Since most Dow Industrial stocks trade on the NYSE and its stocks frequently open gradually over several minutes, gaps on the opening are rarely seen on the Dow. This also mutes the gaps on the S&P 500, which contains a significant number of NYSE stocks.

Markets move to fill gaps, or in other words trade at the price points that were missed when the gap was created. Most of the time, this happens anywhere from the next day to a few weeks later. It sometimes takes months or even years however to fill a gap. Short-term traders should be aware of all the gaps within the last few weeks on the indices, stocks, and even the ETFs they trade (even commodity ETFs fill their gaps on the U.S. charts even though these gaps are artificial because trading took place at the appropriate price points overnight). Traders with a longer term view should keep in mind gaps from the last couple of years that have remained unfilled.

Trading of U.S. stocks in the last six weeks can be viewed as an attempt to fill gaps. Nasdaq gapped up on August 1st and that gap was filled on August 6th. Nasdaq gapped down on August 12th and that gap still remains unfilled. Nasdaq gapped down again on August 24th and that gap was finally filled when Nasdaq gapped up on September 1st. The September 1st move however created a new gap. Nasdaq gapped up again on Friday, September 3rd and attempted to fill that gap in yesterday's trading, but didn't quite fall low enough to succeed. So Nasdaq has unfilled gaps both above and below where it is currently trading.

A market that gaps up and a down a lot is usually directionless, volatile, potentially unstable, and possibly manipulated. It can be a boon to short-term traders. It is not something however that a position trader or long-term investor should find attractive. Those with a longer view may wish to consider that Nasdaq has a large gap around 1800 that occurred in July 2009 and still remains unfilled.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The U.S. Imports Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. import price data for January indicates a rise of 1.4% from December and a 11.5% rise year over year. The price rise in January was the sixth one in a row. Higher energy prices were the major cause of both the monthly and yearly increases. The implications are inflationary.

Prices for imported oil were up 4.8% in January (the U.S. imports approximately two-thirds of its oil). Non-fuel imports were up 0.4%, led by a 1.5% price increase in industrial materials. Metals and chemicals were responsible for most of that rise. The price for foods, feeds, and beverages were up 1.3%. The report clearly indicated that commodities were responsible for almost all of the rise in U.S. import prices in January. Since all commodities are priced in U.S. dollars and the dollar rallied 0.7% during the month, the jump in import prices could have been worse - and will be if the dollar continues selling off as it did for most of 2009.

There was indeed a stark contrast between price changes for commodities and manufactured goods in January's report. Consumer goods were up only 0.2%, while capital goods and automotive vehicles decreased by 0.1%. Inflation has yet to filter into manufactured goods, which are at the end of the chain for price increases. Commodities are at the beginning. The report also indicated significant drops in air fare and air freight prices, both of which will reverse if oil prices stay high.

Over the last year there has been a dramatic change in the inflation picture based on import prices. Year over year price changes were negative and dropped each month from January to July 2009. Yearly prices decreased 12.5% in January and were down 19.1% in July. Since then, a major reversal from deflation to inflation has taken place. In November the yearly import price change became positive and was up 3.4%. It increased to 8.6% in December. In only six months from July 2009 to January 2010, the yearly change in U.S. import prices went from -19.1% to +11.5%. These are truly shocking figures.

In the last month, central banks have indicated they are starting to worry about inflation - China increased required bank reserves twice, the U.S. Fed halted five Credit Crisis liquidity programs and the Bank of England paused its quantitative easing (read money printing) program. All in all though these actions are merely very minor adjustments in monetary policies that are still highly expansionary. Inflation takes years to work its way through the financial system and by the time it is recognized, it is well-entrenched and it is too late to stop it without taking drastic action. Investors should consider the U.S. import price figures as a warning of things to come.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Gold Down on IMF Sales, Then Up on Inflation

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The First Trading Day of 2010 - The Message From the Market

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Observant investors can find moneymaking opportunities if they pay attention to what takes place during the first four trading days of the year. This idea was already part of market lore over a hundred years ago and was confirmed by academic research decades ago. The reason the beginning of the year is more important is that more investment money gets allocated or reallocated on those days than at other times. Whether we like it or not, investing is influenced by a quarterly calendar with the beginning of the first quarter having outsized significance. Which parts of the market money flows into or out of as annual trading begins indicates the aggregate opinion of investors on each sector of the market and the various asset classes. If you want to know what they are thinking, follow the money.

The best way to approach this analysis is with a top down approach. First look at how the major asset classes - stocks, bond, commodities, currencies - are trading. For U.S. stocks you can look at the four major indices: the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the S&P 500, the Nasdaq and the Russell 2000 or their respective ETFs, DIA, SPY, QQQQ (actually the Nasdaq 100), and IWM. For stocks outside the U.S., EFA (Europe, Far East and Australia) and EEM (emerging markets) can be used. For bonds, intermediate maturity U.S treasuries are a good place to start. IEF can be used for treasuries in the 7 to 10 year range.  Overall commodity performance is best tracked through DJP, which is the ETN for the Dow Jones AIG Commodity Index. The two major commodities gold and oil should also be watched. Either their spot prices or GLD and USO can be used to do this. For a quick read on currencies, DXY gives the performance of the trade-weighted dollar.

This initial cursory view can then be refined further based on what assets are doing best or by an investor's particular interests. For stocks, the next step is to look at performance by country, market cap and the nine major sectors of the market. This can then be refined one more step by looking at sub-sectors for the sectors that have done the best. In the end, investors should look for opportunities in the top performing countries and sectors by market cap size (small, mid or large). While stocks are the most complex to analyze, commodities and currencies are the easiest because there are only a small number of them. The performance of each one them can be ranked and it is immediately apparent which ones are the best. Keep in mind seasonal factors can create bullishness or bearishness though, especially for commodities. Bonds are of course more complicated since they can be government or corporate, have a number of maturities and exist in a number of countries.

As can be seen below, based on the first trading day of the year, money was flowing into almost all markets. Stock markets outside the U.S. did the best with emerging markets being the strongest. Small cap stocks did better than large caps. Commodities generally did better than stocks. Interest rates were barely changed. The U.S. dollar lost ground, while other major currencies rallied.

STOCKS:               DIA             Up        1.5%
                               SPY             Up        1.7%
                               QQQQ        Up        1.4%
                               IWM            Up        2.5%
                               EFA             Up        2.6%
                               EEM            Up        3.0%

BONDS:                 IEF              Up        0.3%

COMMODITIES:   DJP             Up        2.0%
                               GLD            Up        2.3%
                               USO            Up        2.4%

CURRENCIES:      DXY           Down    0.5%

Please see 'The Second Trading Day of 2010 - The Message From the Market' to find out more.

Disclosure: Long gold.

NEXT: The Second Trading Day of 2010 - The Message From the Markets

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Energy Investing Guide for 2010

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

As has been the case for many years now, oil was once again one of the best investments in 2009. While oil has a leadership position in energy, it is only one part of a very large and complex sector that includes natural gas, coal, nuclear power, biofuels and renewables. Ultimately, the price of everything else in the sector will be influenced by the price of oil. All sources also have an easy to determine cost per unit of energy generated and these at least in theory should be somewhat similar across the sector. In reality, that price can become significantly different from one energy commodity to another and this can indicate severe over or under pricing. Price moves in oil and the other commodities in the sector don't necesarily take place at the same time, but can be considerably lagged.

While oil and coal (both the commodity and their stocks) and wind energy and natural gas stocks had significant rallies from their respective price bottoms in February and March 2009 , the natural gas commodity, uranium and nuclear-related stocks, and many solar stocks remained depressed throughout the year. While almost every commodity rallied strongly in 2009, natural gas and uranium were the two glaring exceptions. Natural gas prices literally collapsed and at the low were trading at price levels that were seen earlier in the decade and in the later 1990s. Natural gas futures fell to around $2.40 and spot prices were even lower. Uranium had a strong rally from 2003 to 2007 when it rose from around $10 to over $130. It fell to around $40 at its low in 2009 and hovered just above that price throughout the rest of the year. The solar industry is a more complex story. It is only an economically viable source of energy when oil prices are high. At lower oil prices, government subsidies are key. While a few solar stocks have rallied nicely from their lows, most had not gone up much by the end of the year.

In 2009, prices for both natural gas and uranium fell below estimates for their production costs. No commodity can trade in that range for long since production closes down to bring supply and demand back into balance. By the spring, 50% of natural gas rigs in the U.S. had already closed down. In must be kept in mind that prices in both the natural gas and nuclear industries are influenced by the government. The CFTC (Commodities Futures Trading Commission) held hearings this summer about trading in the oil and natural gas markets. Along with the SEC, the CFTC interfered with access to trading vehicles in these markets that were used by the small investor. Natural gas ETF, UNG was effectively turned into a closed-end fund because of the actions of these two government bodies. Leveraged oil ETF, DXO, closed down as a consequence of their interference. As for the nuclear market, the U.S. Department of Energy has a stockpile of 158 million pounds of uranium and it occasionally sells some of this on the open market and depresses prices, just as central bank selling of gold occasionally depresses gold prices.

While prices were down for natural gas and uranium, they are not likely to go lower in 2010, at least for any extended period of time. They will be supported because they are too close to their production cost levels. This does not mean a major rally is imminent however. Prices can get low and stay low for a long time, as was the case in the 1990s. A number of commentators claim that this will be the what happens now because oil, natural gas, uranium and solar stocks were in a bubble that lasted into the 2007 and 2008 period and once the price goes down it will not recover again for many years. Similar arguments were made in 1974 when oil hit $12 a barrel. It's ultimate high was still several years off and several times higher. Energy was in a bullish period back then just as it is now.

Oil looks like it will be strong again in 2010, based on its price behavior in the fall of 2009. Oil prices, like many commodities, have a strong seasonal component. For oil, the bottom tends to be in the winter between January and March and the yearly peak between June and September. Light sweet crude rallied 9% in October 2009, at a time of the year when it should have been selling off. This indicated unusual strength. Crude ended the year near its yearly high, which was somewhat above $80. While seasonal selling pressure will exist for the first couple of months of 2010, buying pressure will then cause the price of oil to rise. It would not be unreasonable to assume that it will get above $100 a barrel during the year. It is not likely however that price will go up enough in 2010 to break the old high of $147. That will have to wait until the following year. Oil and many oil stocks should continue to be good investments in 2010.

ETFs/ETNs, exchange traded funds and exchange traded notes, are the easiest way for investors to get oil and oil stock exposure in their portfolios. The ETF/ETNs: OIL, DBO, USO and USL can be used to invest in oil as a commodity. For those who are more aggressive and want as much as 200% long exposure through leverage, UCO, HOU or LOIL, which trade in the U.S., Canada, and the UK respectively, can be bought. For ETFs that hold stocks of oil and gas companies, XLE, IYE, and IXC are possible choices. Investors bullish on oil stocks can get leverage on them by purchasing DIG and ERX.

While oil should be doing well in 2010, natural gas does not look as promising. There is an incredible glut in the market and new supplies are coming online through the global shipping of compressed natural gas. Still the price of natural gas is relatively low compared to oil on a historical basis. It will take some time to work out the excesses however and fully restore balance between these two commodities. Natural gas tends to have sharp price rises every four to five years and the last peak was 2008, so another really big move up shouldn't be expected until around 2012. Trading opportunities will of course exist in 2010 and low prices will be available for those who want to slowly accumulate and hold their positions for a while. A good ETF for the natural gas commodity is GAZ. Leveraged natural gas ETFs HNU and LNGA trade in Canada and the UK. The leveraged ETFs are a better choice for shorter-term investors.

The supply demand picture of uranium is bullish in the intermediate term. A number of new reactors will be coming online in Asia over the next several years. Growth in the use of uranium usage is expected to be over 2% a year until 2030 according to the World Nuclear Association. The market is thought to be in deficit of 60 million pounds a year. It is estimated that uranium prices would have to move up to around $75/$80 to improve supply. Miners in particular will benefit when this happens. ETFs for nuclear power include NLR, NUCL and PKN. Only NLR has any significant trading volume however.

As for solar power, a few of the leaders had good rallies in the second half of 2009. This is an indication the whole sector is in the beginning stages of a market recovery. Investors should keep in mind though that this is a new industry and there will be a period of consolidation. Some companies will not last. Longer-term investors should avoid stocks with bad financials. The two solar ETFs are TAN and KWT, but these have partially rallied already in 2009 because the leaders in the sector started moving up. Individual stocks which have not rallied too much yet and which investors might want to consider are ENER, JASO, SPWRA, and WFR.

Commodities have been in a longer-term secular bull market since around 2000. This type of bull market tends to last around 20 years. So, there is still a lot of time left and good investments to be made. Buying stocks and commodities on intermediate term drops is the correct strategy in such markets. Buying oil in the spring of 2009 produced quick and substantial profits. Prices in other parts of the energy sector haven't moved as fast as oil did in 2009 and this is giving investors another chance to profit in 2010.

Disclosure: Long ENER, WFR, natural gas.

NEXT: Conmodities Versus Stocks: A Decade Performance Review

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Critical Juncture for Dollar and Stocks

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The dollar began to break down on Friday. Intraday, it fell below the critical 78.33 support level, but managed to close at 78.38. It is hovering just above 78.00 this morning. The next few days should tell whether or not it is making a bottom or just falls apart. This is probably just as important for the stock market because the dollar and stocks have been moving almost perfectly inversely to each other since early March when the dollar peaked and stocks bottomed. A dollar rally should mean a sell off in the stock market.

The close and opposite relationship of the price movements of the dollar and stocks is unusual. The 1990s bull market took place while the dollar was rising, not falling. The same was the case for most of the 1982 to 1987 stock rally. So most of the long secular bull market from 1982 to 2000 was accompanied by a rising dollar. Much of the secular bear market rally that took place between 2002 and 2007 was accompanied by a falling dollar. The dollar dropping to new all-time lows in September 2007 because of the Fed's rate cutting campaign is what finally killed the rally.

A new dollar stock pattern seems to have begun last November when the dollar had a peak and stocks (and a few commodities) made a bottom. The initial relationship was quite jerky however and only smoothed out starting in March. Stocks going up and the dollar going down indicates a trade where people who go long stocks, short the dollar. Only the big banks, brokers and hedge funds are capable of engaging in this trade. It's not mom and pop investor. If the U.S. government is not going to let the dollar break down, this trade is going to have to reverse and stocks are likely to suffer.

While an inverse relationship between stocks and the dollar has taken place, this usual relationship for the dollar and gold has broken down. Gold peaked in late February and the sold off with the dollar until mid-April. It then rallied in early June and sold off again with the dollar until early July. This pattern makes no sense whatsoever. If the dollar rises, there is no reason the decoupling can't continue. August is usually gold's strongest month and gold acted very positively to Friday's GDP Report while the dollar had a vicious sell off. The reaction was so extreme that it looked like dollar traders actually read the report.

NEXT: Dollar Breaks Down

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

G8 Hot Air Inflates Dollar

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The G8 finance ministers met in Tokyo this weekend. Media headlines were blaring, 'Dollar Rises as G8 Looks to End Stimulus'. As usual media headlines have little to do with what actually happened. The ministers discussed a need to prepare strategies for winding down policy measures taken in response to the economic crisis. Note that it's just talk and the talk is about coming up with strategies (they don't exist yet). There is no 'doing' involved here, nor did the G8 come up with a timetable for implementing the strategies once they are created. It's not even clear that they have a timetable for coming up with the strategies. Not only is stimulus not being ended, but there is more than enough reason to believe it will be increased. The IMF managing director commenting on the meeting stated bluntly that the worst is not over yet.

The real goal of this meeting was to jawbone the U.S. dollar up. As reported in this blog the trade-weighted dollar has been hoovering around a breakdown level of 78.33. So far this morning it has been as high a s 80.89 in pre-market trading. At the meeting, the Russian finance minister backtracked on Russia's statement last week that it was cutting its U.S. bond holdings. He stated at the meeting that over the next year or more (the media did not quote this time period, but somehow gathered it from context) he "does not see any significant changes in our policy with regards to dollar denominated paper". He also said he didn't see the dollar losing its reserve currency status in the near future. The media did not report if the pained look on his face was the result of having both arms twisted behind his back.

The effect of the G8 comments was to sink Asian and European stocks markets. Most were down around 2%. Dollar denominated assets such as commodities were hit the hardest. Oil fell to around 70, but then went back up above 71. All this on the hint that maybe sort of kinda perhaps something will done at some unstated point in the future. In past major inflations, governments have always tried to tone down the money printing, but are forced to quickly reverse course because there is an immediate negative reaction when they do so. Looks like we're already falling into this pattern.

In a side note on 'money printing' is a bizarre story coming out of Italy that the U.S. media is ignoring. Italian authorities have seized $135 billion in U.S. treasury bonds from two individuals entering the country from Switzerland and carrying Japanese passports. Among the cache were 249 bonds with $500 million denominations. While this may seem absurd, the U.S. treasury did indeed issue bonds with $500 million denominations between 1955 and 1969. Even more amazing the authorities couldn't tell immediately whether or not the bonds were counterfeit! While it seems likely the bonds are phony, why would anyone bother counterfeiting bonds with denominations so high that only a central bank could buy them? This would also be the biggest counterfeiting operation in history. Whatever is going on, there is definitely more to this story.

NEXT: Market Rally at Key Juncture; Russians at it Again

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Dollar Saga Continues; Commodities Take a Hit

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The sell off in the market yesterday was concentrated in commodities with sharp moves down in anything related to them. Most commodities, particularly those related to oil were at important overbought levels and needed to come down to take some pressure off before they could go to higher highs. A week or even two weeks of selling was compressed into a single day. While this is frightening to look at when it is happening, it is the slow gradual declines that are far more dangerous. Sharp declines create gaps that usually have to be filled and hit support levels very quickly so buyers are encouraged to come right back in. So far many commodity stocks simply sold back to their 10-day moving averages - normal behavior in an uptrend.

The stocks of commodity producers were far more damaged that the commodities themselves. Light sweet crude, which closed at 68.45 earlier in the week, closed at 66.12 yesterday. It's intraday low was 64.95. This drop is hardly remarkable after a six day major move up. In mid-morning European trading NYMEX oil was back up to 68.17 and you would never have known anything had happened if you had been away for the day on Wednesday. Oil started selling down again when the American market opened, so we will have to see what happens.

Gold fell as low as 960, but rebounded to 975 in Euro trading. Silver fell almost to 15.00, but was as high as 15.50. Gold is hoovering under the key 1000 level and silver is trying to break its resistance at 16. Silver was as high as 16.20 in overnight trading on Tuesday. Like oil, the precious complex was selling down on the trade-weighted dollar bouncing off major support at 78.33. The dollar was 79.90 in early trading this morning. The monetary authorities seemed to be pulling out all stops to save it from falling into the abyss. It remains to be seen how long they can be successful.

Bernanke was out with commentary on the economy yesterday. The news media headlined his remarks as "Bernanke Sees No Inflation in the Near Term" (what a convenient headline when the dollar is about to breakdown because of inflation concerns - must be coincidence). For those who don't remember, Bernanke also said in June 2007 that subprime mortgages weren't a risk to the financial system. One month later the subprime crisis blew up. While Bernanke may not be worried about inflation showing up in the next few weeks, his remarks were far more pessimistic than the headlines indicated. He did acknowledge that if the U.S. doesn't get its budget deficits under control there could be significant problems in the future. Of course, Bernanke could just stop engaging in easy money policies that help support the government's spending addiction. This won't happen because Bernanke would first have to face that he was co-dependent serial inflator. Maybe the world's central bankers should form a 12-step support group?

The June meeting of the New York Investing meetup will be held tonight June 4th, 6:45PM at PS 41, 116 West 11th Street. See the website (below my name) for details.

NEXT: Monthly Employment Report and the Market's Reaction

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Gold is in Eastern Capitalism

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The head of China's State Administration of Foreign Exchange stated last night that China's gold reserves were 1054 metric tons, up substantially from previously reported levels. Purchasing gold, along with a whole host of commodities including oil and copper, seems to be China's strategy for getting rid of some of its almost $2 trillion worth of foreign reserve holdings (about half of which are in U.S. dollars). In separate news, a report by Deutsche Bank now predicts that China's GDP will be bigger than the U.S. GDP by the early 2020's. Based on recent reports of U.S. government chicanery in the manipulation of the financial system, capitalism seems to be disappearing in the U.S while it's on the increase in Communist China.

I have long predicted that the Chinese would be increasing their gold reserves, which are paltry compared to the current size of their economy. China also needs to diminish its foreign exchange holdings before the paper that its holding seriously devalues. These efforts have only just begun. Despite buying gold and stockpiling commodities, China's foreign reserves were up slightly to $1.954 trillion at the end of Q1 2009 from $1.946 trillion at the end of Q4 2008. In order to actually diminish its paper holdings, China is going to have to ramp up gold and commodity purchases substantially from recent levels. The implications are bullish for the commodity markets to say the least. China is not the only economy with small gold reserves and large foreign exchange holdings either, the Gulf Oil states fit this description as well. They also have good reason to be buying gold.

As China rises because it is becoming more capitalistic, the U.S. economy is heading down because of it is becoming less so. For anyone who doubts that the U.S. is turning into an authoritarian socialist state where the government calls the shots and no free is left in free enterprise, I suggest you read recent reports about the Bank of America and Merrill Lynch merger. It was arranged by Fed Chair Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Paulson (both Republicans and appointed by a supposedly conservative Republican president). When Bank of America CEO Ken Lewis tried to back out of the deal when he realized it could take his company down, Bernanke and Paulson told Lewis he and the board of Bank of America would be removed if he didn't go along with what the government wanted (recall that the CEO of General Motors was recently ousted and think about the implications for a moment). Lewis also claims Bernanke and Paulson directed him to lie to Bank of America shareholders, who remained uninformed about the actual state of things when they had to vote to approve the Merrill takeover. The government which is supposed to protect shareholders has obviously become one of their biggest enemies. We have pointed this out a number of times in this blog. Unlike the press, which is reporting this story now, the New York Investing meetup has been warning about this for over a year and a half.

Given the current state of affairs, no one should be surprised that China will over take the U.S. economically in as little as 10 years or so - at least based on official government figures. Keep in mind that the U.S. has overstated its GDP for many years and China may have been understating its GDP during its rapid growth phase. Investors needs to keep an eye to the East as economic power shifts there. The U.S. is now at a similar point historically that Great Britain was after World War I. Britain's world dominance was on the wane, while the more rough and tumble capitalistic U.S. was on the rise. Instead of facing this reality and making changes, the British engaged in denial and this assured their fall. The U.S is doing the same thing right now.

NEXT: Buy When There's Flu in the Streets

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Deflation Boogieman, Oil and Intel

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The PPI report yesterday and CPI report this morning both indicated deflation - at least in the headline numbers. PPI was down 1.2% and CPI down 0.1%. The core rates were flat and up 0.2% respectively. Falling energy prices, and falling food prices as well this month, are responsible for the "deflation" that is being reported by the government. NYMEX oil prices meanwhile closed yesterday in New York at $49.41, but were once again above $50 again in European trading this morning (the weekly storage report is out today at 10:30AM New York time). Oil is well off the $33 low being reflected in recent inflation statistics. Tech bellweather Intel released earnings last night and there was actually some good news in the numbers. The CEO also blatantly stated the PC market had bottomed. Apparently traders don't believe him though since the stock had a big drop in the aftermarket.

We have covered many times in this blog how the U.S. government manipulates the inflation statistics to lower the reported inflation rate, so you should always add a few percent to whatever numbers it releases. We have also demonstrated several times how falling oil prices are almost solely responsible for the recent drop in U.S. inflation rates (falling oil along with drops in other commodity prices were the key components of the deflation that took place in Japan in the late 1990s and early 2000s as well, but you will never see this mentioned in media reports). The U.S. government reported this morning that year over year headline CPI is down 0.4% - the first annual decline since 1955 - but the core rate is up 1.8%. Yesterday, the headline PPI was reported down 3.5% since last year, the largest decline since 1950. Gasoline and food prices were down over 13% and even food prices supposedly dropped (something I haven't noticed in the real world).

Considering the light sweet crude oil is already around 50% above its February low, the days of the current "deflation" may be numbered (and of course the U.S. is printing new money at an outstanding rate to make sure they are). During the entire time that oil prices have rallied, the mainstream media has continually stated that the price can't go up until the economy recovers and demand for oil increases (neither has occurred, yet prices have risen) . A quote from an article this morning, "Demand will have to come back before you see the oil price move up from $50 in a sustained way." You can find very similar statements when oil was at $40 and yet the price rose to $50. My guess is you will see similar statements at $60 and probably $70 as well. Interestingly, the people being quoted in the articles today are different from the people that have been quoted, and who have been continually wrong, during the last few months. Is the mainstream financial press actually starting to realize that their credibility is damaged when they continue to quote a source that has been wrong a few dozen times in a row? Perhaps, although you should note that the quotes themselves that contain the inaccurate information are not changing, just the people they are attributed to.

Finally, Intel earnings last night were significant. While they don't exactly indicate that the global economy is running on all cylinders, they do indicate that tech spending is not collapsing. It is also unusual for a CEO of a major company to state so blatantly an opinion of overall market conditions. So why isn't the market giving his bullish comments any credibility? My feeling is that it is because tech spending in the U.S. may not have bottomed. However, the U.S. is not the center of world when it comes to technology spending (and many American traders have yet to realize this). The market for computers in East Asia became twice as big as the market in North America long ago. If demand for tech is picking up in Asia, the market could have indeed be turning around.

NEXT: Economic Statistics are Yesterday, Stock Prices are Tomorrow

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

How to Handle Earnings Season

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Earnings season officially begins today with Alcoa's earnings after the bell. While some company earnings are released every day, there is a huge bulge of announcements in the two weeks following the 7th of the month at the beginning of a quarter. Dow component Alcoa kicks off this period. While earnings are likely to be almost universally bad this doesn't mean that stock prices will go down. They may indeed go up.

Everything is relative on Wall Street. Any information that is known or suspected has already been incorporated in the price of a stock. Since the market overall fell from October 2007 to March 2009, a lot of bad news is reflected in current stock prices. So much so that anything short of a declaration of bankruptcy will be bullish for some stocks. The mainstream media will not emphasize this however and as it is doing today will write articles how earnings will be bad for last quarter. Since this is already known, your reaction should be that everyone already knows that so why are you wasting my time telling me about it. Only if earnings are worse than expected are they likely to be negative for stock prices (for more than a day or so).

If you are holding company stocks like Alcoa (AA), you have two choices. You can sell before the earnings announcement and buy back after or just hold through it. This decision isn't always clear cut. Having bought AA just off the bottom and having a nice profit it in in just a short time, I chose to sell it with the intention of buying it back. The market has had a sharp up move in the last 3 weeks and it vulnerable to a drop this week in general, so AA's earnings are coming out during a period of weakness. The market reacted quite negatively (at least for a short time) to Chalco's (the Chinese Aluminum company) earnings and negative description to the aluminum industry several days ago, so it is not unreasonable to assume a short negative reaction for Alcoa as well. Of course, Alcoa could surprise on the upside, it which case I would wait a few days for a pull back to buy it.

In general, I am still looking to buy beaten down stocks in a some commodity sectors (not copper since is has rallied since last fall, I also sold my FCX holding recently) and a technology stock here or there and will view a drop on earnings as an opportunity to get a good price. The market is filled with under priced bargains at the moment (some stocks are even selling for less than their yearly cash flow). You should look at anything that will do well in a high inflation environment and avoid the financial sector, where a low price these days usually indicates cheap goods as opposed to a bargain. It is important to know the difference.

NEXT: The News is Bad ... Time to Buy

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Surgery Done by a Bull in the China Shop

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Today is the beginning of the spring quarter and the new fiscal year in Japan. Last night, most of Asia rallied and the Nikkei was up smartly (the Nikkei never hit a new low in the market sell off this spring by the way). A bailout plan in Taiwan for semiconductor manufacturers was bullish for tech stocks throughout the region. A Chinese manufacturing report was dismal, although off the low established last November (when the prices of many commodities also bottomed). European bourses are down this morning and the U.S. market indices gapped down after gapping up yesterday. The market is worried about the G20 Meeting tomorrow and the Jobs Report on Friday. The U.S. government possibly forcing GM into bankruptcy has also reared its ugly head again as well.

The government's current handling of GM is incredibly destructive economically. News has been leaked that Obama thinks a 'surgical bankruptcy' is the best option. If so, that surgery is being conducted by a bull in a China shop. A recapitulation of what is going on:

1. The U.S. Economy has been losing its manufacturing base for the last 30 years and has moved increasingly to a FIRE (Finance, Insurance, Real Estate) economy and this has led to the current implosion of our financial system.
2. Instead of trying to revive manufacturing, the government is trying to drive a top manufacturer into bankruptcy - and somehow this is going to improve things.
3. Sales for automakers are down as much as 50% year over year because of the economy. The U.S. government then tells reluctant car purchasers that we are trying to drive GM out of business and make them worry that if they buy a GM car they will ever be able to get it fixed (this may not be realistic, but it is something that will give the consumer pause and hurt GM sales even more).
4. No one knows how many credit default swaps there are on GM bonds, but the number is probably substantial. A bankruptcy would put them in the money and require that they be paid off. Most of them would have been sold by insurance companies and brokers that are already getting government bailouts and this will require more bailout money (probably many times what it would cost to bailout GM) to make up for the losses.
5. The U.S government just spent $5 billion bailing out auto part suppliers and is undermining that bailout if it forces GM into bankruptcy.
6. There are a large number of current and former employees of the auto industry, its suppliers, its shippers, etc that will be negatively affected by this action.
7. The GM announcement stopped a nascent stock market recovery in its tracks, wiping out billions more from retirement portfolios. The Dow was up over 20% (technically a new bull market) and the government apparently couldn't wait to drive it right back into bear market territory. Treasury Secretary Geithner already caused a major market sell off previously with his handling of Citigroup. If the Obama administration's goal is to keep stock prices down, they are achieving outstanding success.

While I am not a fan of bailouts, I am even more opposed to incompetent business practices combined with unlimited government stupidity. As we have said in this blog before you can bailout no one or you can bail out everyone, but doing some bailouts and not others produces the worst results. What the Obama administration is doing with GM makes no sense on any level - and it does not bode well for the handling of economic matters going forward.

NEXT: The Bull Heard Around the World

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Next Few Trading Days Are Important

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Money moves around at the beginning of a quarter. Look for shifts in the next few days. You want to observe whether money is flowing into the market overall or are people taking money out and selling. If the market goes up, the big money has become more confident and the rally is going to continue for awhile. It is even more important to note which sectors have money moving into them and which sectors are selling off. The three most bullish sectors of the recent rally have been financials, basic materials and technology. You would like to know if this is continuing or are other sectors getting more fund inflows.

The news backdrop may color the picture somewhat however. The G20 meeting is on Thursday and the possibility of fireworks exists. The Jobs Report is coming out Friday and the consensus is that it will be quite ugly. While this may seem like it will be negative for the market, it may not be. When people are expecting the worse, even something slightly better can be considered bullish and make stocks go up. And as we have stated many times in this blog, the U.S. government is not beyond manipulating its economic statistics to make them look better. The market, at least up to this point, takes these reports at face value no matter how absurd they might seem. The latest incarnation of this behavior has been in the seasonal adjustment figures which have recently been quite sizable and always in the direction of making things look better.

The market was filled with panic selling yesterday. I usually look at this behavior as an opportunity to buy and I did pick up some commodity stocks that had big sell offs. So far, yesterday looks like just another typical Wall Street shake down. Investors who got in at good prices are scared out of the market, those that haven't are frightened away. The big money buys the stocks the small money is selling. Take a look at the press coverage yesterday and you will see that it is overwhelmingly negative and one-sided. Many important facts are left out. This is not the coverage you typically see when the market is going to have a serious sell off. Media pundits tell you to get into the market to catch the next move up when the market is actually turning down. Wall Street is busy selling at that point - and they want you to buy.

The market is filled with bargains right now. If you concentrate on buying stocks in the commodity sector and beaten down stocks in industries that deal with the production or movement of tangible goods that are necessities or pervasive, you will make money. This is where you will get your biggest bang for the buck when inflation hits. And don't worry, expect the mainstream media to inform you in a year or two that this is what you should have been doing in early spring 2009.

NEXT: Surgery Done by a Bull in a China Shop

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

In the Eye of the Financial Hurricane

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

There is some effort to talk down the current rally by the media today (assume the shorts have planted the stories). This doesn't mean the rally is going to end at the moment however. The momentum is very strong and doesn't seem to be have been dissipated yet, so no need to rush out and sell anything. The rally will end however and be followed by a sharp drop, possibly to lower lows. The current rally is very much a Bear Market rally and these differ in a number of ways from the beginning of a new Bull Market.

The money has been very easy in this rally and that is a common marker of Bear Market rallies. Prices move up very fast and seemingly without restraint. In contrast, beginnings of new Bull Markets are usually a struggle. It took about 10 months to put in the base at the bottom in 2002 and 2003 (the current bottom has had about a 5 month base put in so far). The market did not just shoot straight up out of that base. The bulls and bears battled for control on almost a daily basis with the bulls being able to only gradually move the market up. That type of constant give and take allows rallies to last a long time - about 10 months in 2003/2004. The current move up is almost effortless and because of that it can burn itself out pretty quickly.

The current rally has also been led by the biggest losers of the downturn - the financials. This is typical of bear market rallies, which are mostly short covering affairs. Once enough of the shorts close out and prices rise a lot, new short positions are put on that drive prices back down. The only thing that has made the financials more valuable is that the government is willing to put more taxpayer money into their coffers. Their value is no longer determined by economic forces, but corporate welfare payments. Not exactly an enticing long term economic model for investors.

There are three things for the current rally that need to be watched closely - resistance, earnings season, and April 15th. All the major indices are about to enter a strong band of resistance. For the Nasdaq, this starts at 1600 and goes to around 1650. The Dow has strong resistance at 8300, with with more resistance around 9000. For the S&P 500, there is resistance between 870 to 940. These are levels where the rally is likely to run out of steam. Another limiting factor to the rally is that first quarter earnings season starts around April 7th. Rallies into earnings usually mean a sell off after - and sometimes even during. As for April 15th, people frequently sell investments to pay their taxes and the market tends to dip then for that reason (although the dip can be temporary). So in figuring out when to sell, watch resistance and watch the calendar.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

No Longer Gilt Edged - the Inflation Implications

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Yesterday, a regular government bond auction in Britain failed for the first time since 1995. There were more 45-year gilts for sale than buyers willing to purchase them. The British government is only printing money to buy its bonds in the 5 to 25 year range and it is now obvious the printing presses are going to have to be reved up to expand this program if Britain wants to fund its various bailout and stimulus packages. Meanwhile the U.S. bond auction yesterday was a 'success', although in order to insure that success the Fed had to purchase a higher amount of bonds than was previously thought necessary. The inflation implications of more money printing did not escape the market's attention with almost every commodity rallying strongly this morning.

The commodity rally took place even though the economic news was gloomy across the board. U.S. fourth quarter 2008 GDP was revised further downward to a drop of 6.3%. Businesses and consumers are both cutting spending and unemployment roles are swelling weekly. The mainstream press has continually told investors that commodity prices can't pick up until demand increases and this will require the economy to start picking up. They have been continually wrong. Commodities are all inflation hedges and the big money is well aware of this. Even the most cursory examination of the charts indicates many commodities bottomed last fall and their prices have been moving up since then. You should ask yourself why doesn't the press just report this simple factual information?

This blog has covered the mainstream media's misreporting of the oil market in detail many times. Headlines for the weekly supply picture from Cushing, Oklahoma were uniformly bearish yesterday. Oil in storage increased 3.3 million barrels, instead of the 1+ million increase that had been predicted and was more than 15% higher from the same time last year. As usual the press quoted 'experts' indicating demand has to pick up or the current rally will falter (as opposed to the previous reporting that stated that demand has to pick up or there wouldn't be a rally). Oil indeed sold off on this bearish news. What the press didn't report or buried at the bottom of its coverage was that demand for gasoline has actually risen for the last four weeks (even though the press will tell you this is not possible during a recession - the facts sometimes get in the way of the story the media wants to tell you). Gasoline in storage is actually more than 5% below year ago levels and the beginning of the heavy usage summer driving season is only two months away.

Investors should all keep in mind that commodities are inflation hedges and the U.S. and Britain are admitting they are printing new money. This doesn't mean that they just started printing additional money, but that the money printing is so out of control that it can't be hidden any more. There is no time in history where the money supply hasn't been expanded beyond the economic growth rate and inflation hasn't resulted. The inflation this time is going to be considerable. If you haven't done so already, you should be adjusting your portfolio accordingly. By the time the mainstream media tells you to do so (they are currently telling you the deflation is your big worry), it will already be too late.

NEXT: In the Eye of the Financial Hurricane

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Commodities Rumble, Financials Tumble

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Alcoa was one of the biggest movers in the market yesterday. At one point it was up over 20%. It was also the stock that I pounded the table to buy at Tuesday night's class on Technical Analysis. Our February choice, DXO, is up over 50%. Basically every stock I mentioned during the class had a good to huge rally. Even FCX, used to illustrate a number of technical points and well advanced in its rally would have made you good money. It was in the upper 34's on Wednesday morning, but over 42 at its high yesterday (there are better bargains in the market at this point). Even a Canadian Royalty Trust that I only mentioned in passing that I had purchased, went up nicely. A couple of attentive attendees took the hint. Coal stocks across the board had terrific rallies. We spent a lot of time looking at coal in the class. While I wasn't sure steel had bottomed, it rallied sharply nevertheless. No one apparently picked up on the shipping company that I made a gratuitous remark about, probably because I didn't state that I owned it. It was up 28% yesterday.

What wasn't up yesterday were financials. Citigroup was down 26% at its low, but closed down 16%. It is planning a reverse split. Wells Fargo was down 10% and Regions Financial down 12%. Broker, Morgan Stanley was down 13%. Insurance companies were clobbered (watch this space for a future bailout). Prudential was down 25% and Met Life, 12%. While you can make good money day trading financials, their long term picture is down while the long term picture for commodities is up. You can no more walk away while holding these positions than you could leave a big pile of chips unattended at the gambling tables in Vegas or Atlantic City. Of course you would eventually not have that pile of chips anyway since gambling, unlike investing, is ultimately a losing activity.

While the precious metals rallied yesterday, beaten down silver did much better than gold. Both were significantly down on Wednesday morning and shot up like rockets after the Fed announcement. It looks like a lot of traders were stopped out of both during the drop. I've seen this Wall Street racket played repeatedly over the years. Manipulators drive down the stock price driving the small players out and then a sudden reversal takes place and it shoots up to the sky. The inside players get the stock cheap and makes big profits, while the small investor is left holding the bag . Only if you have a accurate big picture of what is going on can you protect yourself from this type of shake down.

Oil continued its rally yesterday, closing at 51.61. This was the highest close since December 1st and represents a very significant breakout. Next resistance for the futures contract around $57. Natural gas finally joined the party and was up 42 cents to $4.10. This is a rally right off the bottom. Probably best to wait for some pull back from the initial rally if you want to buy. Gasoline and even heating oil had significant rallies yesterday as well. Oil has now rallied from the high 33's to over 52 in a month. During this entire time, the mainstream financial media has published one story after another about how oil can't rally until the economy improves and how oil can't rally because demand is declining. Nevertheless, oil has rallied sharply. Apparently the smart money doesn't pay any attention to the media, nor should you if you want to join the big money some day.

NEXT: Making a Silk Purse Out of a Sow's Ear

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Will Reward Real Value Going Forward

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Stocks rallied again yesterday and are doing so again this morning. Deconstructing this rally can provide investors with a lot of useful information going forward. While much of what it is taking place so far is short covering, some of that can turn into sustainable price increases and some of it can't. The market is also showing a clear preference for value over growth and hard assets over future promises, which makes perfect sense in a down economy with impending inflation.

The biggest up moves have been seen in the financial stocks. Many of them have massive short positions and in such cases any little piece of news can cause a big rally. It is also quite easy to have a big percentage gain if your company's stock was as low as 97 cents as Citigroup was. A move to 1.85 (the price as I write this) means a rally of over 85%. In the very short term, the big money is in the financials (if you trade them, watch them like a hawk). Nothing has really changed in their underlying value however. Many are still essentially insolvent, even if they haven't been fully nationalized yet like AIG, FNM, and FRE. Interestingly, bankrupt AIG, Fannie and Freddie are still trading and are in the pennies. They have not participated in the rally. You can expect many of the financials to come right back down and at some point to stay there.

Commodity stocks have also had nice rallies in many cases, but nothing like the financials. The represent extreme value and the possibility of sustainable action in long term (many of them actually bottomed sometime between last October and December and made a bullish divergence with the rest of market by not going to new lows in the recent sell off). In most cases they own large deposits of oil or metals, as opposed to worthless pieces of paper. These will not only maintain their value, but increase it at rates faster than inflation. In contrast to these hard asset stocks are growth stocks, which frequently have very limited real assets but are valued based on their future business. These are the stars in long term bull markets (think tech stocks in the 1990s), but are put on the back burner in long term bear markets. The IBD 100 is good proxy for this group. It has underperformed the market indices in this rally and this is not surprising. The days of easy money in this group are not likely to return soon.

Like all rallies off the bottom, the first down move will be important. Minimally, you don't want to see the recent lows broken and you would like to see the low of the first down move put in by next Friday and then a rally follow that. If the market breaks the lows from last week, a drop to the next major support levels is likely. This will almost certainly happen in the future, but doesn't have to happen right now. Long down moves in bear markets are frequently interupted by nice rallies on the upside.

NEXT: Today's Economic Lunacy

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.