Retail Sales and Employment Not as Good as First Reported

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There has much cheerleading in the mainstream press lately about the improving employment situation and strong 2011 holiday retail sales. Just released figures indicate it may have been much ado about nothing.

Retailers depend on the holiday season for their yearly profits. Major efforts were made in November to get people to start buying early. This worked and retail sales were up 0.4% during the month. Strong early numbers don't necessarily mean overall numbers will be greater however. It can simply mean that buying activity was frontloaded and the later numbers will then be weak. This is exactly what happened. Retail sales were up a whopping 0.1% in December (retail sales are not adjusted for inflation, the number would be negative if it had been).

Looking inside the report shows how incredibly weak the consumer is. Excluding autos, which are highly volatile, retail sales were 0.2% lower -- the first drop since May 2010. Core retail sales, which exclude autos, gasoline and building materials were down 0.1%. Even though it was the height of the holiday buying season, spending at electronic and appliance stores was down 3.9% and spending at department stores was down 0.2%. Once again, if the numbers had been adjusted for inflation they would have been even worse.

So how come U.S. consumers aren't spending more now that the employment situation is supposedly getting better?  Well, maybe it's because it isn't. The big news lately has been the declining weekly claims which have fallen below the traditional 400,000 per week that indicates recession. However, for the first week of 2012 they came in at 399,000 -- back at recession levels. This was up from the 372,000 reported the previous week (three states including mega-sized California didn't send in their claims numbers for this report).  Of course, the mainstream press blew the trumpets about the "good", but highly questionable, 372,000 number, just as it did for the 200,000 jobs that were allegedly created in December 2011.

Among these jobs were 42,000 new messenger positions. While it's more likely that 42,000 messengers were hired in December than 42,000 nuclear physicists, that doesn't mean it is believable. Messengers work in a field with declining employment. The December jobs report has been criticized as having "statistical adjustment" problems. Non-statisticians generally refer to this as lying about the numbers. Of course, the appearance of suddenly improving economic news (not to be confused with an economy that is actually improving) at the beginning of a presidential election year should not be surprising.

As the election season heats up, there will be a desire for the government to report that economic conditions are better than they actually are.  This does not mean the news will necessarily be good, it will just be better than it actually is. Expect the bad news to come out after the November election.  Until then, invest with caution. 

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There is more fantasy in the U.S. employment numbers than in a Harry Potter novel. According to the BLS, the U.S. added 120,000 jobs in November 2011 and the unemployment rate fell by 0.4%. This is not possible.

The U.S. economy needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady based on new entrants into the labor force (the oft cited 200,000 figure is based on past conditions that are no longer applicable). According to official sources, the U.S. added 131,000 jobs a month in 2011. This is better than in previous years, but still not enough to reduce the unemployment rate. Yet, the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims the unemployment rate is dropping and fell from 9.0% to 8.6% in November. How is this possible?

Well, first of all, it isn't. These numbers were created — and "created" is a very appropriate word in this case — by claiming that large numbers of workers left the U.S. labor force. At the same time, the U.S. government has stated that an economic recovery has takien place. A country's labor force does not shrink during recoveries, it grows. This has not happened during the current U.S. "recovery".

The U.S. labor force had approximately six million fewer workers in November 2011 than it did in November 2007. Four years ago, 146,793,000 people were employed in the U.S. In November 2011, only 140,987,000 had jobs. This makes no sense if a recovery has taken place. It does make sense however if there is an ongoing recession and government statisticians have decided to massage the numbers for political reasons.

On the flip side, there were 79,069,00 people not in the labor force in November 2007 and today that number is 86,757,000 — almost eight million greater. The labor force of the U.S. should not be shrinking because the number of students and immigrants looking for jobs exceeds the number of people retiring. People do leave the labor force though if they have determined that there simply are no jobs to be found. The recent Consumer Confidence survey from the Conference Board indicated that less than 6% of Americans thought jobs were currently plentiful. 

In November 2011 alone, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force dropped by almost a net 600,000. This helped reduce the reported unemployment rate to 8.6%. This form of statistical manipulation is something that might be expected in a corrupt third-world backwater. Apparently, this is the standard that Washington is now adhearing to for its statistical reporting. 

 
Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any securi

New Homes Reveal Old Problems With Government Statistics

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The U.S. New Home Sales report released on December 23rd indicated a drop of 11.3% in November. Analysts had expected a gain. According to the previous Commerce Department reports, new homes sales had risen every month since April. They were expected to rise again in November because a government tax credit for new home buyers was originally scheduled to end in the beginning of the month (it was extended to June 2010), so analysts had assumed that there would be a rush of last minute buyers. There may have been and without them the drop might have been much greater than 11%.

New Home Sales is almost certainly the most inaccurate of the economic reports issued by the U.S. government. I can say this with some certainty because it would be almost impossible to produce something more error ridden. One of the major news services stated in their coverage of the November report, "Government statisticians have low confidence in the monthly report, which is subject to large revisions and large sampling and other statistical errors. In most months the government isn't sure whether sales rose or fell." Read that last sentence again and then consider that if the U.S. government is willing to issue an official report on housing that is about as accurate as picking numbers randomly out of a hat, how much can you trust the GDP, CPI, PPI (the two major inflation reports) and Non-Farms Payroll reports. Also note that the mainstream financial media seems to be well aware of the lack of reliability, but doesn't mention it except on very rare occasions when the news is particularly bad.

If the New Homes Sales report is so prone to inaccuracy why not just fix the problem? This is indeed a good question. The statistical tools to make this report better have been known for decades and yet the U.S. Commerce department doesn't seem to be able to apply them. It can be assumed that this isn't done because they don't want to do it. Statistically sloppy work is extremely prone to manipulation after all, solidly done work is not.

When confronted with this problem, you will get a more accurate picture of what is taking place by looking at many months of data in aggregate and comparing it to the previous year (the errors will cancel out at least to some extent). In the first 11 months of 2009, new home sales are down 24% from the first 11 months in 2008. Inventories have been falling throughout 2009 and are now at 38 year lows. The number of homes under construction or planned for construction have fallen to a record low. If new home sales were rising between April to October as the Commerce Department reported, why are home builders building fewer and fewer homes? That doesn't look like an industry in recovery as the public has been repeatedly told. For some reason, we seem to have gotten a glimpse of the true state of the housing market in the November New Home Sales report. Perhaps the guy in charge of producing cheerful statistics was on vacation? Somehow, I'm sure he'll be back soon.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

NEXT: Investing Themes for the Next Decade

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.