April 2012 Jobs, Labor Force Continues to Drop

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The BLS release the employment situation for April 2012 this morning. The report showed that 115,000 jobs were created last month and the current unemployment rate is 8.1%. The big story however was the incredible number of people leaving the U.S. labor force  — almost ten million in the last five years.

Looking at any of the macro numbers since the Great Recession began in December 2007 indicates that the employment situation in the United States is severely challenged. People are leaving the labor force in droves. The participation rate continues to fall as well. This does not happen during economic recoveries. It happens during recessions and depressions. Not only have these numbers trended in the wrong direction since the "recovery" supposedly began in mid-2009, but there has been an acceleration.

These trends are hidden because large numbers of people enter the labor force because of school graduation and immigration. When balanced against the number of people retiring, the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 new jobs every month to keep the employment situation steady. It has rarely met or exceeded this number in the last four years, yet the unemployment rate reported by the BLS has declined significantly. This can only happen because large numbers of people have left the labor force (a sign of economic stress).

According to Table A of the BLS employment reports, there were 78,711,000 Americans not in the labor force in April 2007. In April 2008, four months after the Great Recession began, this number had risen to 79,241,000. In April 2009 just before the supposed recovery started, 80,554,000 Americans were not in the labor force.  This loss of less than two million during a recession isn't surprising . What is surprising is what happened during the recovery.

After almost a year of recovery, the number of people not in the labor force grew to 82,614,000. This was an increase of more than two million, a number greater than the loss during the previous two years that included the recession. Then in April 2011 after another year of recovery, 85,726,000 Americans were not in the U.S. labor force — an increase of over three million in only one year. Now in April 2012, 88,419,000 were not in the labor force. This was an increase of almost three million in one year.

In the five years since April 2007, 9,708,000 Americans have left the U.S. labor force. During this period the labor force should have grown approximately 9,000,000 (60 times 150,000). The picture these numbers present are one of an economy in severe decline. Don't expect to hear this from the U.S. government however. Politicians don't get reelected by reporting bad news.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Only Suprise for March Employment Was that it Wasn't Even Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the BLS, the U.S. created only 120,000 non-farm jobs in March. The mainstream media cited this figure as a surprise because it was well below expectations. The real surprise was that the number wasn't even worse.

Winter month employment numbers came in at the 200,000 level and this was trumpeted as evidence that the economy was finally gaining steam. There were two problems will this line of reasoning. The first is that the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month for the unemployment rate to stay even (this balances the loss of people retiring with new students and legal immigrants entering the job market).  In order to put any serious dent in the massive amount of unemployment that exists the monthly number of jobs being created needs to be well over 200,000. The second problem was the unusually warm weather during the winter that magnified the impact of the seasonal adjustments.

If seasonal adjustments boosted the numbers in January and February, then lower numbers should be expected in the normally warmer spring months. The weak March number seems to be bearing this out. It is interesting to note that the Retail Trade category lost 34,000 jobs in March. This does not support the idea that retail sales have actually been strong as has been claimed, but that the numbers have instead been artificially boosted by inflation. Retail employment is prone to large swings due to seasonal factors.

The official unemployment rate fell to 8.2% from 8.3%. The obvious question is how can this happen if less than 150,000 jobs were created and that's the amount needed for things to remain in equilibrium? It can only occur if more people than expected leave the labor market. This happened again last month  as has been the case during the entire economic "recovery"(millions of people have left the U.S labor market since the Great Recession began). The mass exodus from the labor market creates a huge reservoir of unemployed waiting to reenter the market if conditions actually improve. This reentry could keep the unemployment rate from falling well into the decade.

People of course do not leave the labor market in droves when the economy is on an upswing. The continued shrinkage of the labor market indicates an economic downturn. Don't expect to hear that from either the U.S. government or the cheerleading mainstream media. Politicians don't get reelected by telling the public bad news.

A key question that usually goes unexamined in reporting about the jobs numbers is the high price the U.S. taxpayer and consumer will be paying in the future for the jobs being created today. The U.S. has run deficits of $1.3 trillion or more since 2009. Pumping all of that money into the economy will of course create jobs, but at what cost?  Unless there is a free lunch, that money will have to be paid back either through higher taxes or higher inflation. Both will lead to lower job creation in the coming years.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Non-farmPayrolls -- The Statistical Illusion of Jobs

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Employment Report for December 2011 was released today with a glowing press release from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics).  The highlight of the report was the 42,000 courier and messengers jobs created last month and the claim that the unemployment rate fell to 8.5%

Statistics can easily be manipulated and it is not unknown for political regimes to do so in order to hold on to power (and 2012 is an election year in the U.S.). After all, it is much easier to change a number than to fix the underlying problem the number represents. Fortunately, the BLS publishes a number of statistical Tables with each monthly report that can be used to check its calculations.

When the Great Recession began in December 2007, the civilian non-institutional population of the United States was 189,993,000. At that time, the number of people in the U.S. labor force was 125,588,000. As of December 2011, the BLS states that the employment population ratio for the U.S. is 58.5% (0.585). The non-institutional population of the U.S. was reported at 193,682,000 or 3,689,000 higher than it was in December 2007. The labor force in December 2007 was 125,334,000 and multiplying the increase in the U.S. population in the intervening four years by the employment population ratio indicates that the labor force should have increased by 2,158,000 to 127,492,000.  However, the BLS reports the U.S. labor force last month was 124,114,000. More than three million people are missing from its figures.

The smaller the labor force is, the better the headline unemployment rate becomes. The BLS claims these three million plus people left the labor force and this justifies purging them from the statistics. There is a problem with their line of reasoning however. Large numbers of people only leave a labor force during periods of severe economic distress.  It does not happen during economic recovery. It does not indicate an employment situation that is improving.  Yet, the BLS produces numbers showing things are getting better when this happens. This violates the first rule of statistics -- the results must reflect reality. The BLS numbers do not.

Dividing the number of employed in December 2011 by the size of the labor force that should exist based on the population numbers produces an unemployment rate of 9.6%, not 8.5%. This is the headline number that should be reported. If the BLS wants to insist however that more than three million people have indeed left the labor force (and this has continued in the last year -- the size of the labor force in December 2011 is smaller than it was in December 2010), it should also make it clear that this indicates that there has been an ongoing recession and no economic recovery has taken place. Both can't happen at the same time, except for a brief period. Either the economic recovery story is a lie or there hasn't been a shrinking labor force. 

While mainstream economists will insist that employment is a lagging indicator (more than two years is some lag), this has only been the case in the U.S. years after statistical "improvements" were introduced in the 1980s and 1990s in how government economic numbers were determined. Before that, employment recovered with improving GDP as should be the case. If you think about it, the term jobless recovery makes as much sense as tall midget or genius moron.

The improvement in the weekly unemployment claims is also being cited as evidence of an improving jobs picture. It would be more accurate to say that it is evidence of a jobs picture than can't continue to get worse. As I have stated since at least mid-2010, the weekly claims number will regress toward the mean (move to its long-term average) because eventually there will be few workers who remain to be laid off. After being elevated for several years, the only way that weekly claims  can now increase is with a big jump in bankruptcies. This will be avoided as long as the economy holds steady.

What is keeping the U.S. economy from getting worse is the unprecedented budget deficits that the U.S. is running. If you spend an extra $1.3 trillion dollars that you don't have as the U.S. did in 2011, this will certainly stimulate the economy in the short-term since much of this money winds up in consumer pockets and they spend it.  According to the non-farm payrolls report for December, the U.S. is not exactly getting good value for this money. Unless of course, you think low-paying courier and messenger jobs should be the cornerstone of the economy.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
 Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There is more fantasy in the U.S. employment numbers than in a Harry Potter novel. According to the BLS, the U.S. added 120,000 jobs in November 2011 and the unemployment rate fell by 0.4%. This is not possible.

The U.S. economy needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady based on new entrants into the labor force (the oft cited 200,000 figure is based on past conditions that are no longer applicable). According to official sources, the U.S. added 131,000 jobs a month in 2011. This is better than in previous years, but still not enough to reduce the unemployment rate. Yet, the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims the unemployment rate is dropping and fell from 9.0% to 8.6% in November. How is this possible?

Well, first of all, it isn't. These numbers were created — and "created" is a very appropriate word in this case — by claiming that large numbers of workers left the U.S. labor force. At the same time, the U.S. government has stated that an economic recovery has takien place. A country's labor force does not shrink during recoveries, it grows. This has not happened during the current U.S. "recovery".

The U.S. labor force had approximately six million fewer workers in November 2011 than it did in November 2007. Four years ago, 146,793,000 people were employed in the U.S. In November 2011, only 140,987,000 had jobs. This makes no sense if a recovery has taken place. It does make sense however if there is an ongoing recession and government statisticians have decided to massage the numbers for political reasons.

On the flip side, there were 79,069,00 people not in the labor force in November 2007 and today that number is 86,757,000 — almost eight million greater. The labor force of the U.S. should not be shrinking because the number of students and immigrants looking for jobs exceeds the number of people retiring. People do leave the labor force though if they have determined that there simply are no jobs to be found. The recent Consumer Confidence survey from the Conference Board indicated that less than 6% of Americans thought jobs were currently plentiful. 

In November 2011 alone, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force dropped by almost a net 600,000. This helped reduce the reported unemployment rate to 8.6%. This form of statistical manipulation is something that might be expected in a corrupt third-world backwater. Apparently, this is the standard that Washington is now adhearing to for its statistical reporting. 

 
Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any securi

Is October's Unemployment Rate Really 12.7%?

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The BLS released its non-farm payroll figures for October today and they stated that 80,000 jobs were created and that the U.S. unemployment rate was 9.0%. There are reasons to believe that this number is actually as high as 12.7%.

Except for February and March of this year, the unemployment rate (the U-3 number) has been 9.0% or higher since May 2009. It hasn't risen well into the double digits because large numbers of workers have supposedly left the labor force and these people are not counted as unemployed. If we go back four years to just before the Great Recession began, we find that in October 2007 there were 145,937,000 employed Americans over 16 and 79,506,000 were not in the labor force. Now in October 2011, there are 140,302,000 employed people and 86,071,000 not in the labor force. You can see the figures here: http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab1.htm.

So in the last four years the American economy has had a net loss of 5,635,000 jobs. This huge loss hasn't shown up in an escalating unemployment rate because at the same time a net 6,565,000 people have supposedly left the labor force. The BLS conveniently does not count them as unemployed even though they do not have jobs. If we included them in the unemployment calculations, the unemployment rate for October would be 12.7%. This should not be confused with the underemployment rate (known as U-6) which includes people working part-time, but who want full-time jobs. This number was 16.2% last month.

A case could be made that the U.S. labor force should be shrinking because more people are retiring than there are graduating students. There are approximately 3.5 million people reaching age 65 (not all of whom retire and many of whom didn't work) and only about 3.2 million students graduating high school currently (eventually most of them enter the labor force). While retirees have the advantage, there are also approximately a net 1.3 million immigrants coming into the U.S. every year and a disproportionate number of them are younger adults of employment age. The labor force should at least be steady, if not growing slowly. Instead, BLS figures indicate a rapid shrinkage is taking place.

It would be highly unusual for the labor force to decline at all during a recovery. When the economy is strong, people on the margins go out looking for jobs. For the labor force to drop by millions indicates an extremely weak economy.  So, if the U.S. labor force has six and a half million fewer workers than it did four years ago, no significant recovery has taken place. If the labor force hasn't dropped by as much as the BLS claims, then the unemployment rate is in the double digits and this also indicates no significant recovery has taken place. While it seems more likely than the true unemployment rate is closer to 13% than 9%, either figure indicates that the U.S. economy is still recessionary.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Recovery Goes Jobless in August

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

More evidence that the U.S. economy is grinding to halt was provided by the August non-farm payroll numbers today. According to the BLS (the Bureau of Labor Statistics), the U.S. economy produced no additional jobs in August, the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 9.1%, and average hourly earnings declined. The June and July numbers were revised downward with 58,000 less jobs than originally reported.

Almost every category lost jobs in August except for health care and social assistance, professional and business services, and mining and logging. Health care and social assistance added 30,000 jobs. This category was the one perennial gainer during the Great Recession and its aftermath. Even though many of these jobs are government related, they are classified as private sector by the BLS. Professional and business services added 28,000 jobs. A footnote in the report states that this number includes jobs from other unspecified categories (could those be government jobs that are included to make it look like private sector employment is better than it actually is?).  Mining and logging added another 6,000 jobs.

Year over year comparisons were even more dismal than the monthly numbers suggested. There were only 400,000 more people employed in the U.S. this August compared to August 2010 (see Household Data, Summary Table A on the BLS website for the details). This is the actual net number of new jobs created in the last year. This has averaged 33,000 a month. At the same time, the non-institutionalized civilian population has been growing at almost 150,000 per month. Yet, during this time period, the unemployment rate fell from 9.6% to 9.1%.  This has happened not because a lot of jobs were created, but because approximately 2.3 million people left the labor force.

Despite close to zero percent interest rates and the trillions of dollars of stimulus thrown at it, the U.S. economy seems incapable of producing jobs. The only thing that has prevented the reported unemployment rate from rising into the double digits is the large numbers of people exiting the labor force (they are not counted as unemployed). This doesn't happen when a real economic recovery takes place. People rush into the labor force as jobs become more plentiful. Unemployment rates also don't remain at the 9% level if the economy is doing well as has constantly been reported. Mainstream press claims to the contrary,  a "jobless recovery" just doesn't exist in the real world (nor are there tall midgets or thin obese people). Based on the jobs numbers, investors should assume that the U.S. has been in a chronic state of recession and chronic stimulus is needed to keep things from getting worse.   

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
 

July Consumer Spending - Reports of Its Health Greatly Exaggerated

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The U.S. stock market reacted jubilantly to July's consumer spending numbers. Apparently, it didn't see the bad news the BLS report contained. Some of this was understandable since the AP (Associated Press) article -- carried by hundreds of news outlets -- seems to have reported more favorable numbers than the ones the government released.

The important take-away from the report was that disposable personal income adjusted for inflation (or more accurately adjusted to reflect some of the inflation that actually exists) was down 0.1%. So if there was any increase in consumer spending, it was taking place on money being borrowed by already tapped out consumers. U.S. consumer debt, including mortgages, is already more than the $15 trillion GDP. Federal government debt is approaching that amount.

Both the BLS and AP reported that consumer spending increased by 0.8% in June. This number is unadjusted for the official inflation rate. The rise was concentrated in the durable goods component of the report. The BLS reported this as being up 2.0% and AP had it up 1.9%. Apparently, U.S. consumers ran out and bought more automobiles and automobile parts in July. According to the government, they then spent less on non-durable goods (items that last less than a year). According to AP, they spent more.

The BLS report had non-durable goods spending down 0.3% in July. AP reported it up 0.7%. Both reports had spending on services being up, the government by 0.5% and AP by 0.7%.  The story reported by AP was far more favorable that the one told by the U.S. government, which was in turn much more favorable than would be the case if some realistic inflation rate was used. The discrepancy for the non-durable and services numbers in the two versions is probably a consequence of AP using numbers not adjusted for inflation. These numbers will always make things look as favorable as possible. This is not news; it's public relations that favors Wall Street and makes the government look like it's doing a better job with the economy than is actually the case. Traditionally, this would be referred to as propaganda.

While the spending on durable goods was concentrated in transportation, increases for services took place because Americans were using more electricity to run their air conditioners during the record hot weather in July. This does not indicate the economy is getting better, nor that it is even flat. It indicates that it was hot in July. Yet, the AP couldn't wait to quote economists that claimed the consumer income and spending numbers that it reported indicated a U.S. economy with rosy prospects. Perhaps they should try including comments on the actual numbers next time.

The BLS report can be found at: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/2011/pi0711.htm

One of the hundreds of places the AP report can be found is:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Consumers-spending-rebounds-apf-1701587266.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

BLS Press Release MisReports August Jobs Data

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to the August jobs report, the U.S. lost another 54,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate rose to 9.6%. The government claimed that the private sector added 67,000 jobs, although most of these jobs came from the Health Care and Social Assistance category and from Education, both of which are filled with jobs supported by the government. The numbers in the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) press release did not agree with the Data Tables and of course made things look better than they actually were.
      
The data in the non-farm payrolls report indicated that there were 40,200 jobs created in the Health Care and Social Assistance category (the mainstream media almost always leaves off the Social Assistance part, perhaps because these are so obviously government and not private sector jobs). Interestingly the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) press release only admitted to 28,000 jobs and this incorrect number was picked up in every mainstream media article. The BLS press release, which can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf, stated "Employment in health care increased by 28,000 in August, with the largest gains occurring in ambulatory health care services (+17,000) and hospitals (+9,000)".  The Establishment Data Seasonally Adjusted (Table B in the report), which can be found at: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.b.htm, stated that the number of jobs in Health Care and Social Assistance increased by 40,200.

The Goods Producing Sector, which actually does include mostly private sector jobs (nationalized companies like General Motors being the exception), was dead in the water in August. The total number of jobs added was ZERO. Goods producing industries include Manufacturing, Mining and Logging, and Construction. Manufacturing lost 27,000 jobs and this contradicts the rosy picture painted by the ISM manufacturing report from two days ago that indicated U.S. manufacturing employment was skyrocketing. Construction kept the Goods Producing Sector from being negative by adding 19,000 jobs. This occurred even though new home sales recently fell to the lowest number ever recorded. Perhaps these workers are busy building castles (or more appropriately, McMansions) in the sky, so of course their work isn't immediately visible to ordinary mortals such as ourselves.

There is no evidence in the August payroll numbers of any significant non-government related hiring taking place. The first job loss number was reported three years ago in August 2007 and after over $3 trillion in deficit spending since then, the U.S. employment situation has managed to only reach a state of controlled bleeding. There were an estimated 6.6 million students graduating from school this year and eventually most of them will need a job. That implies the U.S. needs 550,000 new jobs a month to absorb former students into the labor force. People are of course always leaving the labor force as well because of retirement and for other reasons such as giving up looking for a job because none are available. It has been generally accepted for a long time that the U.S. must add at least 200,000 jobs a month to just accommodate new people looking for work.  Even after getting to that level, and we are still losing jobs not gaining them, there is then an additional 8 million jobs that have to be created to replace those lost during the Credit Crisis. So far, it's just not happening.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

July Payroll Report Marks 3 Years of Job Losses

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The U.S. lost 131,000 thousand jobs in July. It has now been three years since the first job losses appeared in August 2007. Despite over three trillion dollars in government deficit spending since then, the employment situation has yet to turn around.

While job losses date back to August 2007, they didn't become consistent until 2008 and 2009.  Every month in that two-year period, except November 2009 had a decline in payrolls. Job gains were reported between January and May 2010, with payrolls increasing over 200,000 in March, April and May. The U.S. economy needs to add 200,000 jobs a month just to stay even because of new entrants into the labor force (recently the mainstream media has downgraded this long accepted number to 100,000 in an effort to make things look better). Unfortunately, most of those jobs added in the spring were part-time temporary Census positions and now those people are being fired, so job losses have returned. There was a loss of 221,000 jobs in June - revised downward from the originally reported loss of 125,000.

The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) reported this month that the private sector added 71,000 jobs. Only three sectors accounted for most of these 'gains' - Health Care, Motor Vehicles, and Transportation and Warehousing. Health care and Social Assistance added 27,000 jobs. Health care has been the only sector to continually add jobs during the downturn. Government and Education were the other two categories that frequently added jobs. Education and Health Care jobs mostly come from the government or are paid through government programs and should not be considered private sector. Motor Vehicles gained 21,000 jobs through the magic of seasonal adjustments, not by actually hiring more workers. Transportation and Warehousing added 12,000 jobs.

The headline unemployment rate (U-3) for July was reported as 9.5%. This compares to 4.6% rate in August 2007. Including forced part-time workers and some discouraged workers (U-6), sometimes referred to as the underemployment rate, the July 2010 rate was 16.5%. The reported unemployment rate would have been much worse if close to a million people didn't supposedly leave the U.S. labor force in May and June of this year. This was a truly amazing finding considering as many as 6.6 million American students graduated from high school and college in those two months. While all of them didn't enter the labor force, most of them that did were without jobs when they graduated. Where are they in the statistics?

The U.S. labor situation began to deteriorate three years ago. Since that time, trillions were spent in bailouts, there has been approximately $3.5 trillion in federal deficit spending, and the Fed has kept interest rates as zero percent starting in December 2008. The public was promised over and over again that each program would make things better. The stock market has rallied on that good news over and over again. Empty promises and fantasy statistics will only work for so long however. At some point we will find out for just how long.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Census Hiring Used to Manipulate U.S. Employment Numbers

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


According to the Financial Times, the U.S. is hiring 1.2 million census workers for the 2010 national head count that starts in April - twice as many as were needed for the 2000 census. While census workers are government employees, they do not appear to be showing up under the government category in the monthly non-farm payrolls employment report (hiring began by March 2009). The Bureau of Labor Statistics appears to be counting these temporary jobs in the Business and Professional Services category. As a consequence, the employment numbers make the U.S. economy look much better than it really is.

The March employment report indicates that the U.S. lost 36,000 jobs in February and the unemployment rate was 9.7% if certain discouraged and forced part-time workers are not counted (unemployment would be 16.8% if they were included in the numbers). Any job loss indicates an extremely weak economy, but so does a small job gain. Since new workers are always entering the labor force, the total number of jobs available needs to continually increase, by as much as 200,000 a month by some estimates, in order to maintain employment stability. A lesser number should lead to a higher unemployment rate. Nevertheless, unemployment held steady in February and actually dropped significantly in January when 26,000 jobs were lost. Interesting, to say the least. Apparently two plus two doesn't always equal four.

Examination of the detailed numbers within the monthly employment reports reveals that the lower rate of job losses in the last several months can be attributed to the hiring of large numbers of temporary workers in the Business and Professional Services category. In February, a net 47,500 such workers were hired, in January it was a net 50,200 and in December 2009 a net 49,700.  The numbers are remarkably even and that makes them look like part of some planned operation.  A footnote indicates that these temp workers include hiring in 'other' industries not shown separately. At the same time, government jobs supposedly decreased by 18,000 in February and decreased by 26,000 in December 2009. If the 1.2 million census workers were being included in the government employment figures, this would indicate massive lay offs have been taking place elsewhere in the government. Surprisingly, it doesn't seem that any such lay offs occurred. So where are the census workers in the U.S. employment reports?

Everyone knows that increases in government jobs don't indicate a recovering economy. It is also common practice for businesses to hire temporary workers in the early stages of a recovery and then permanent workers later on. If the federal government's statistical operatives placed temporary census workers in the Business and Professional employment category, it would certainly make the U.S. employment picture look much better than it really is. Regardless of where the census workers are being hidden in the statistics, their jobs are temporary and should completely disappear by the fall. U.S unemployment will increase by 1.2 million when that happens. It's not clear where the U.S. will get the jobs to make up for the loss.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: Stocks Experience Irrational Exuberance on Employment Report

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Report: 617,000 Extra Unemployed in 2009

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) just revised its figures for 2009 and these now show that there was an extra 617,000 jobs lost in the U.S. economy last year. This works out to 51,000 more jobs lost on average per month than the U.S. government reported. Since there is no reason as of yet to think the Bureau is doing a better job in 2010, investors might want to subtract this number from future employment reports to get a more accurate read of what is really going on in the U.S. labor market.

The numbers being reported are bad enough as is. January Non-Farm Payrolls showed a loss of 20,000 jobs (perhaps that should be minus 71,000). According to the Bureau's recent numbers, jobs have been lost every month since the recession began in December 2007, except for last November. While the job losses for the other eleven months of 2009 were revised to show a greater loss of 38,000 to 101,000 jobs, November was inexplicably adjusted upward by 60,000. One major media outlet emphasized this one positive number while neglecting to mention that December had an extra loss of 65,000 jobs, which more than offset the increase in November.  Something similar happened in the December 2009 employment report where an extra 15,000 jobs appeared in November, but at the same time 16,000 jobs disappeared in October. Some might find this activity an indication of manipulation.

With today's revisions for 2009, the U.S. government now admits that 8.4 million jobs were lost during the recession. Even though there was more than an extra 600,000 people who lost jobs in 2009 than was previously acknowledged, the BLS reported that the total number of unemployed decreased and that the unemployment rate fell from 10.0% in December to 9.7% in January.  The BLS specifically stated that the "number of persons unemployed due to job loss decreased by 378,000 to 9.3 million". They further stated, "In January, the civilian labor force participation rate was little changed". Those who took first grade arithmetic might be puzzled by these highly inconsistent numbers and statements.

The key to how well the U.S. economy is doing is how many jobs are being created in the private sector. To get a ballpark figure, investors should not just subtract the 51,000 job error rate from the BLS monthly numbers, but also the number of jobs that the government has created - reported as 33,000 in January. This would indicate that the private sector lost 104,000 jobs last month. It has been more than two years since the recession began and the U.S. economy is still bleeding jobs, although the government is doing its best to hide the true extent of the problem. To actually reduce unemployment, the U.S. economy will have to add 200,000 or more jobs a month to compensate for new entrants into the labor force and the return of discouraged workers. There is no reason to believe that this will be happening anytime soon.

Disclosure: None

NEXT: U.S. Consumer Credit - Being Held Up by Government Loans

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Numbers Indicate More Stimulus Ahead

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The December 2009 Nonfarm Payroll report (released January 8th) indicated that the U.S. added jobs for the first time since the recession began two years ago. This didn't take place in December however. Payrolls last month fell 85,000 with most of the damage coming from drops in construction and manufacturing. Revisions for past months made by the BLS indicate that the U.S. added 4000 jobs in November, instead of the 11,000 loss initially reported. At the same time that 15,000 extra jobs appeared in the November totals, 16,000 were subtracted from the October totals. Certainly, some would think this was suspicious.

While the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) may be playing tricks with the numbers to make the U.S. employment situation look better, it is still quite obvious that the overall picture is pretty dismal. The best spin they could put on the recent news was that the drop in the numbers in the fourth quarter of 2009 was much less than in the devastating first quarter. This 'we are still falling off a cliff, but at a slower rate' message shouldn't reassure anyone. While it is true that there are less layoffs now than there were a year ago, the numbers literally couldn't have gotten much worse. Looking inside recent U.S. employment reports, it can be seen that large numbers of temporary workers added to payrolls have prevented the job loss numbers from being lower than they would have been otherwise. Another 47,000 temp workers were added in December. People have also been leaving the labor force in large enough numbers to keep the top line unemployment rate at only 10.0%. According to the BLS another 661,000 people supposedly exited the U.S. labor force between November and December 2009. While people who aren't in the labor force obviously don't have jobs, they are not considered unemployed.

There were only three industries that added employees in December. Professional and Business Services added 50,000 employees, but this seems to be mostly temporary workers. Education added 13,000 jobs. Health Care added 22,000 jobs and has been the one perennial bright spot in U.S. employment since the recession began. It has added jobs every month in the last two years. A vibrant health care sector can't be the cornerstone of a healthy economy however. The goods producing sectors are needed for this and they are still hemorrhaging jobs. Another 53,000 jobs were lost in construction and 27,000 in manufacturing in December. The loss of construction jobs is not surprising since other statistical reports indicate that U.S. real estate activity is weak. Reports on Durable Goods and the ISM Manufacturing index though indicate U.S. manufacturing has been doing well for many months. There seems to be a disconnect there.

Unemployment is perhaps the most sticky of political issues and something that politicians watch closely. Their automatic reaction is to spend more money to tackle the problem. First they borrow it, and when the credit lines run out, they print it. The U.S. is already well along in this scenario. Investors can also expect a continuation of the Fed's zero interest rate policy until there are real improvements in the employment numbers. It is estimated that it will take the creation of 200,000 jobs a month to lower the U.S. unemployment rate. December's report indicates that this won't be taking place in the near-term future.

Disclosure: Not applicable.

NEXT: Sun Shines on Solar Stocks in Early 2010 Trading

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Figures Don't Add Up

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Fed chair Ben Bernanke is up for reappointment and is experiencing some difficult times with his congressional critics. Good news has suddenly and conveniently appeared to bolster his case however, including Bank of America planning on repaying the TARP money it received from the U.S. government and then a big improvement on the non-farms payroll number released on December 3rd. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were only 11,000 jobs lost in November 2009 and the losses for the previous couple of months weren't nearly as bad as they had reported (the last time there were actual job gains in the U.S. was in December 2007). Independent private surveys don't corroborate the government's numbers.

The U.S. government figures were not completely rosy by any means. They indicate that there were major job losses in Manufacturing and Construction, a significant drop in Information and in Leisure and Hospitality jobs, and amazingly a drop in Retail jobs during the height of the holiday season. U.S. Manufacturing employment fell by 41,000 in November and has declined by an eye-popping 2.1 million since the recession began in December 2007. Construction jobs fell by 27,000. There was also a loss of 17,000 jobs in the Information industries (half of that in telecommunications). Leisure and Hospitality lost 11,000 jobs. Jobs in retail declined by 15,000. You would not know this from reading the BLS press release however, unless you looked at the data attached to the bottom of it. The copy did not mention that there was a job loss in retail, but instead stated "there was little change in wholesale and retail employment".

So where did the job gains come from? Three categories had increases in employment -Professional and Business Services, Education and Health Services and Government. Professional and Business Services was the big gainer adding 86,000 jobs. However, 52,000 of those jobs were part-time. Education and Health Services added 40,000 jobs with 21,000 of these jobs coming from Health Care and presumably 19,000 from Education (which is not known for hiring people in November). Government added 7,000 jobs. The two consistent job producers since the recession began two years ago have been the Government and Health Care categories, with Education also frequently adding jobs (many health care and education jobs are government related).

The BLS claimed that unemployment fell from 10.2% to 10.0% in November. How can the unemployment rate fall when there are job losses? People have to leave the labor force. Barring a sudden population decrease of working age individuals, workers have to get so discouraged form the bad employment situation that they just give up looking. According to the BLS, 2.3 million people are marginally attached to the labor force and are not counted as unemployed because they did not look for a job in the previous four weeks. Another 9.2 million are working part-time even though they want full-time employment. The alternative unemployment rate which includes discouraged workers and involuntary part-time workers was reported by the BLS as 17.2%.

A check on U.S. government employment figures can be gotten from the ISM (Institute of Supply Management) Services and Manufacturing Indices, both of which survey employment as well as a number of other factors which indicate economic growth or lack thereof. The Services Index was released just yesterday and employment came in at 41.6 (under 50 means contraction). Employment in the services sector has been in decline for the last 19 months and dropped from October to November according to the ISM. All the job gains in the government employment report supposedly came from the service sector. There is a major contradiction here.

The November non-farms payroll figures are another government release indicating the U.S. economy is getting better. This one doesn't add up either. Healthy economies don't have major job losses in manufacturing and construction. Nor are jobs lost in retail during the holiday season (they are during depressions, but certainly not if the economy is improving). The big job gains were part-time, not permanent. The unemployment rate is improving because workers are so discouraged that they are leaving the labor force, not because jobs are being added. This doesn't happen if the economy is getting better either. Furthermore private surveys don't support the governments numbers. Investors should be wary. While markets can be fooled in the short-term, in the long-term they trade on reality.

Disclosure: None.

NEXT: Gold in Technical Correction as Dollar Rallies

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Our Current Economic Illusions

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

When reading economic statistics, you should see if they are consistent (they rarely are) and make sense based on real world observations (lately they don't). On Thursday, December 3rd the U.S. productivity numbers were released, as were same store sales and weekly unemployment claims. The story these three pieces of data are telling are quite different, which means at least one and possibly two of them are not correct.

Productivity in the U.S. is supposedly up astronomically. It rose by 8.1% last quarter and this is after being revised down from being up 9.5%! The recent downward revision of third quarter GDP from 3.5% to 2.8% meant the productivity numbers would be lower as well. Productivity is essentially the amount of GDP produced per worker. Since employment is falling in the U.S. and GDP is supposedly rising (the two moving in opposite directions is illogical) productivity has to go up. According to the government, it is going up a huge amount. Is there any major new technological advance or innovation accounting for this? None, that anyone knows about. Economists claim that productivity has gotten better because the least productive workers have been fired. While this might give the numbers a percentage or so boost, it wouldn't give them an 8% boost. The alternative explanation is that GDP is being grossly overstated by the U.S. government. There is substantial documentation that this has indeed been the case for the last three decades.

Same store sales is not a government report and the November numbers clearly show an economy in trouble. Sales were down 0.3% year over year. While this may not seem so bad initially, it is when you consider sales were down 7.7% last November, which was the height of the Credit Crisis meltdown. They are even lower now. Analysts (who are almost always wrong) originally forecast a 5% to 8% increase for this November. Consumer spending accounts for 72% of U.S. economic activity and is still obviously in bad shape. Yet, the government tells us that GDP is growing nicely. There seems to be a contradiction there.

If you read the mainstream media coverage of the weekly jobless claims you would have seen that the U.S. employment situation is getting better because there were only 457,000 new claims during the week of Thanksgiving. Of course, you might consider that few employers would lay off workers right before a major holiday and that state unemployment offices were closed because of the holiday, so this would obvioulsy lower claims. The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) states that they make some 'adjustments' for this though. Claims at even the 400,000 level indicate significant recession and they need to drop to the 300,000 level to indicate a healthy economy (you will see much higher numbers cited in most mainstream media reporting). Continuing claims are still rising and have hit 5.5 million. This number doesn't include an additional 4.5 million on extended umemployment benefits. A large percentage of the American work force is not eligible to collect unemployment as is, so the numbers are even worse than they appear. While there are those who claim that unemployment is a lagging indicator, statistics from the past don't support this notion. The real lagging indicator seems to be the truth about what is really going on in the economy.

NEXT: U.S. Employment Figures Don't Add Up

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why You Can't Trust U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The market was ecstatic with the November 25th U.S. weekly jobless claims figures. According to the report the number of Americans filing for unemployment fell 35,000 from the week before, dropping to 466,000. Bullish headlines such as "Jobless Claims Plummet to 14-Month Lows" were all over the web. Commentators immediately started gushing about unemployment turning around and job gains being just around the corner. Stock futures perked up, the U.S. dollar continued a sell off already well underway, and gold which had been rallying strongly turned down on the news.

As for myself, I stopped paying attention about 15 years ago to the weekly jobs claim number the week of the release. Why? At that time, there was also an unexpected major drop in the claims figures. The markets went crazy on the news. One week later, the number was revised sharply upward with a statement from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) that one state had not gotten their figures to the department a week earlier so they hadn't been included in the totals. While the BLS knew this at the time, it did not inform the public of this important inaccuracy. The error was quite substantial as well, since the state that didn't report was obviously California. It should also be noted that the November 25th report was released on a Wednesday, one day earlier than usual, because of the Thanksgiving holiday on Thursday. It is quite possible not all the state data came in early enough to be included.

At the same time the weekly jobless claims were released, the monthly Durable Goods and Personal Spending reports also came out. Durable goods declined 0.6% for October indicating a weakening economy. A drop in defense spending was blamed (just another form of government spending propping up the U.S. economy). However, orders for cars, machinery (needed for factories), computers and communication equipment (both needed for offices) also fell. Personal spending was up 0.7% in October. This is hard to believe considering U.S. consumer credit has had a major drop in the last year and the over 10% unemployment rate has negatively impacted consumer income. Where is the money coming from for the increases in spending?

The most significant market action on the release of all this data was the falling U.S. dollar. The trade-weighted dollar cut through the recently established 75.00 support level and traded as low as 74.40 in early morning New York trading. There is a strong band of support between 72.00 and 74.00. Expect a bounce off the top of that band initially, with an eventual test of the 2008 low around 71.50. While the dollar hit another yearly low, spot gold hit another new all-time high, trading up to $1183.80. Expect to see more of the same in the future.

Disclosure: Long gold, no dollar positions. Long time critic of the BLS.

NEXT: Desert Bubble Bursts, Blows Sand in Market's Face

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Non-Farm Payrolls and Its 'Statistical Quirks'

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

When deciding how credible this mornings jobs reports is, you only have to look at one number. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in the auto industry went UP by 28,000 last month. Nobody believes this, and I mean nobody, not even the biggest government boot licking financial reporters. Even the mainstream media cautioned that this could be a 'statistical quirk', the polite term in the numbers industry for lying. You should assume that finding one 'statistical quirk' in a report is similar to finding one roach in your apartment. In both cases, there's a lot more that you're not seeing.

The headline number for the report was a loss of 247,000 jobs, which is bad enough as is. July was the 19th consecutive month for job losses. Since the recession has began in December 2007, the government admits that 6.7 million jobs have been lost. Goods-producing industries shed 128,000 jobs, and service-producing industries cut 119,000 jobs, including 44,000 in retail and 38,000 in professional and business services. Unemployment in retail (the largest individual private sector employer) seems to be accelerating. After the 'robust' auto industry gains, health care was the biggest job gainer. Government also added about 7 thousand jobs, but this information was left out of the BLS press release even though it is always reported (when information that has always been available suddenly disappears watch out).

According to the government, the unemployment rate declined to 9.4% (actually 16.3% if you include discouraged workers and involuntary temp workers). You may ask how is it possible for there to be a significant job loss and for unemployment to improve at the same time (could it be another 'statistical quirk')? It's simple - 422,000 people 'conveniently' left the labor force. Even though the O'bama, Bernanke, and Geithner and the BLS in its press release tell us that the economy is improving, large numbers of people are giving up looking for jobs because they think there is no chance of finding one. Somehow, I don't think both of these contradictory views are possible. One of them seems to be a lie - pardon me, I meant 'statistical quirk'.

If you listen carefully to what Obama and Bernanke have been saying for the last several months, you will notice that 'things are getting less worse' is the gist of their statements. The Obama litany is: the financial meltdown has ended (which happened during the Bush administration, but he still takes credit for it), the rate of job loss is slowing, and the stock market is doing better. Bernanke also concentrates on the stock market is getting better theme (and I am sure this is not taking place without some government assistance). The recession is indeed getting 'less worse', although not as much as the government claims. There is also a huge gaping chasm between getting less worse and getting better. However, the government may be able to solve this problem in the future with bigger 'statistical quirks'.

NEXT: The Smoking Gun of the Economic Recovery Scam

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Unemployment Rises to 15.6%

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Jobs Report was out this morning and it was pretty gloomy. While the headline number indicated that unemployment rose to 8.5%, a more accurate number is 15.6%. The second figure includes many (but not all) discouraged workers, those who have looked for work in the last year, but not during the last month, and part-time workers who wish to work full-time. It is the 15.6% figure that you should compare to the approximately 25% unemployment rate at the bottom of the Depression in the 1930s.

The initial read for March was a loss of 663,000 jobs (close to economists predictions of 654,000). There will be two revisions for this number in May and June and expect both of them to be down, although the worse and worst figures will get no press and the BLS is well aware of that. January's number, originally reported as a loss of 598,000 jobs, had its second revision down today and the number is now a loss of 741,000. So far, there has been a loss of 3.7 million jobs in the U.S. economy in just the last six months. Expect this number to be even lower after all the revisions have been done.

Last month every sector except health care had job losses. In previous Jobs Reports since the Credit Crisis began, government and education have supposedly added jobs. Manufacturing continues to be decimated with a loss of 126,000 jobs in March. The Obama goal of driving GM into bankruptcy should help make these numbers even worse in the future. Professional and Business Services, which held up much longer than Manufacturing, had a loss of 133,000 jobs last month. Retail lost 48,000 jobs (and is very vulnerable to much greater losses). Despite all the bailout money, Financial Services still lost 43,000 jobs. Construction lost 161,000 jobs and with a commercial real estate collapse just beginning unemployment there could rise much higher. Not only were a lot of jobs lost last month, but the average workweek fell to a record low as well.

The stock market is selling off slightly so far on the employment news, which is not surprising considering the big rally in the last two days. The positive reaction of stock markets globally at the beginning of the quarter should help carry the current rally for another month or two, although after a big surge, sideways trading or selling for awhile is inevitable. Whether the rally can survive into the third quarter is problematical. For the moment, investors should keep in mind the old stock market adage from the 1800s - 'sell in May and go away'.

NEXT: Geither Talks, Market Drops .... Again

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Unemployment Rate Rises to 13.9%

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The Jobs Report for January was out this morning and even the official figures are grim. While the headline number stated an unemployment rate of 7.6%, the report itself had another unemployment rate of 13.9% buried within in. The 13.9% rate includes discouraged workers, those who have given up looking for work, and those who are working part time (even an hour a month), but want to work full time. Keep in mind these are the government's own figures. You can certainly substantially increase the top line 7.6% if you want something more realistic. The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) itself will be doing so in the future as is.

Upward revisions have been the name of the game for job losses and the unemployment rate for many months now. The first figure which gets all the press coverage isn't as bad as the revision that takes place a month later and that in turn isn't as bad as the revision a month after that. As an illustration, October 2008 job losses were first reported as only 240,000, then a month later as 320,000, and then finally as 423,000. November started out as 533,000, then became 584,000 and is now 597,000. December was initially reported as 524,000 and is now 577,000. Expect it to be higher next month. There is almost 100% probability that the 598,000 lost jobs for January will be a bigger number in February and March. It is already the biggest loss since the 602,000 decline in December 1974 (the peak number for the worst recession since the 1930s).

The monthly revisions aren't the only ones conducted by the BLS either. There is also an annual benchmark revision done at the end of the year. This year's revision found that there were 311,000 less employed people than previously reported. This downward revision means that there were 3 million jobs lost last year, instead of the 2.6 million reported last month. This number exceeds the 1945 figure of 2.8 million jobs lost, which happened because of the closing down of defense manufacturing and decommissioning of millions of soldiers. There is no bigger number since that date until 2008. Any greater number would have take place during the Great Depression.

The bad news in today's Jobs Report were presaged by yesterday's Weekly Jobless Claims, which came in at a deep recession level of 626,000 (the highest since October 1982). The figures in this report indicated 4.8 million people were receiving unemployment benefits, even though the actual figure is 6.5 million. The 1.7 million receiving extended benefits are not included in the first number. It should also be kept in mind that a majority of the American labor force does not qualify for unemployment benefits and thus will never show up in these figures. As bad as the U.S. employment situation appears to be, assume it is much worse than the official figures indicate.

NEXT: Short term, the Market is Looking Better

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Eonomics Reports - From Very Bad to Even Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The jobs report this morning was as bad as expected. The stench of economic decay emanating from the figures was unfortunately magnified by a number of other recently released economic indicators. Several days ago, Consumer Confidence for December came in at 38 - an all-time low. Yesterday, many retailers released their same store holiday sales and they were the worst in at least four decades. Lost in today's news about U.S. employment was the Wholesale Inventory report which showed a record decline in sales that blew away the previous record, set only one month ago. While the jobs report was bad enough on the surface, things are even worse than the headline numbers indicate.

The BLS reported that the U.S lost 524,000 jobs in December and the unemployment rate went up to 7.2%. Job losses for November and October were revised upward to 584,000 and 423,000 respectively. The BLS has constantly revised the monthly job losses higher in the two months following their initial release all year long (the press doesn't emphasize or even acknowledge that this takes place). Without further revisions to November and December figures, the total job losses for 2008 is 2.6 million. This figure was last exceeded in 1945, when the U.S. was transitioning from a war time to peace time economy.

In total, 11.1 million people were unemployed in December. This figure does not include part-time workers who can't find full-time work, nor discouraged workers that have just given up looking for a job (the U.S. unemployment rate would be 13.5% if both categories were included). While full-time employment is falling, part-time workers grew to 8 million from 7.3 million in November. As usual, only three categories gained jobs -government, education (which is mostly government) and health care (apparently people are becoming increasingly sick because of the economy). Even though governments at all levels in the U.S are in retrenchment mode, they have continually hired more and more workers all year long according to the BLS. If you extrapolate this trend into the long term, you will see that eventually government will employ 100% of the American labor force. For some reason this makes me suspicious.

Looking at business conditions from the wholesale perspective, an even gloomier picture emerges. Wholesale inventories (goods held by distributors who buy from manufacturers and sell to retailers) fell 0.6% in November and sales fell by a depression level 7.1%. The decline in sales shattered the old record of a 4.5% drop, which was just set in October. Wholesale inventories make up about 25 percent of all business stockpiles. They are a leading indicator of future retail business - and a double digit decline in just two months does not augur well for the economy next spring

NEXT: The January 8th Meeting of the New York Investing meetup

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.