Lying with Statistics: the September Jobs Report

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

One month before the presidential election, there was suddenly a major reversal in unemployment trends that have taken place during the entire administration of the Obama presidency. The figures indicate explosive growth is taking place in the U.S. economy and this has occurred overnight. The explanation of where this growth is coming from or how it has happened is illusive.

Unlike the previous four years, large numbers of jobs were supposedly created last month. Actually that's not exactly the case. The household survey reported 873,000 jobs were created, whereas the business survey reported 114,000 — a typical amount. In previous months, the household survey has actually indicated major job losses. The mainstream media has failed to report this. However, when a number suddenly appears that lacks credibility in the same survey, but that number is positive, it apparently is worth reporting. 

Where did these jobs come from?  It's not clear from the report. It was specifically stated that "manufacturing employment edged down in September". There was a loss of 16,000 jobs, so there is no evidence that U.S. manufacturing is on the upswing. Based on the following statement, 600,000 people were hired part-time last month: "The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) rose from 8.0 million in August to 8.6 million in September". This is a huge change. Where are these part-time workers employed and what were they hired to do? Will they be fired the day after the election?

Perhaps even more amazing is that the BLS reported that the U.S. labor force grew in September 2012 for the first time in years. From August 2007 to August 2012, the U.S. labor force shrank like it would during a depression with a total 9,602,000 people leaving it. It abruptly increased by 418,000 last month. What caused such a large number of people to suddenly influx into the labor force? GDP last quarter barely grew indicating a stagnant U.S. economy.

The number of unemployed persons, at 12.1 million, supposedly decreased by 456,000 in September. The BLS stated that the unemployment rate fell to 7.8% —  the first time it has been below 8.0% since just after President Obama took office. The continual multi-year unemployment rate of over 8.0% has been a major issue in the presidential election.

The numbers in the September employment report are quite fantastic and there is no basis for believing them. Disreputable statisticians can easily produce highly unreliable numbers. If statistics are inconsistent with the past, with each other, have no traceable explanation or seem contradictory with real world observations, they are suspicious. In the case of the September employment report all four criteria have been met. The quality of U.S. economic numbers have been decaying for the last 30 years. They seem to currently be making the transition from manipulation to outright fantasy.

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment in Long-Term Downtrend

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The August employment report released on September 7th was not particularly good by any measure. While the month to month changes seem lackluster, the longer term picture is truly dismal.

The headline numbers indicated that 96,000 jobs were created in August and that the unemployment rate declined from 8.3% to 8.1%. The previous two months were revised down by 41,000 however. Manufacturing employment was down 15,000 from July. "Food Services and Drinking Places" was the category with the biggest gains, adding 28,000 jobs last month.

Underneath the surface, the picture wasn't mediocre, it was negative. Looking at the total number of people listed as Employed in Table A indicated that 119,000 fewer Americans had jobs in August than in July. This comes from the Household survey and receives little attention from the mainstream media. This number was negative in the July release as well. Why isn't this reported?  Well perhaps the media doesn't trust people to know whether or not they actually have a job.

What happened to employment between July and August though was minor compared to the weakening jobs picture over the last five years. It was in August 2007 that the Fed cut the discount rate, which was the beginning of its attempts to stimulate the economy. By the end of 2008, the Fed's Fund rate was at zero and a number of special programs had been implemented to handle the Credit Crisis. The first quantitative easing program had begun and a second round took place after that. In respect to jobs, the figures indicate that the Fed's efforts have been an utter failure.

In August 2007, 145,794,000 people were employed in the U.S. Last month, five years later, 142,101,000 people had jobs. So after all of the Fed's efforts and all the stimulus programs implemented by the Obama administration, there were 3,693,000 less jobs in the United States.   In his Jackson Hole Speech in August, Fed Chair Ben Bernanke stated the Fed's efforts "increased private payroll employment by more than 2 million jobs". Oh really?  Why don't those jobs show up in the government's own statistics Mr. Bernanke?

What caused the unemployment rate to be reported as lower in August than in July was a decline in the labor force. It shrank by 368,000. This is only a continuation of a multi-year trend though. In August 2007 there were 79,319,000 people not in the U.S. labor force. By last month, 88,921,000 didn't have jobs. That's an increase of 9,602,000 in five years. Yet, at the same time the employable population has grown substantially.

What about during just the Obama administration? His employment record is a big issue in the current presidential election after all. The labor force population has increased from 234,552,000 to 243,555,000 or by 9,003,000 so far during Obama's term. The current participation rate of 63.5% (low for the last few decades) would indicate that approximately 5,717,000 jobs should have been created to keep employment at a steady state. When Obama took office in January 2009, 142,099,000 Americans were employed. As of August 2012, 142,101,000 Americans were employed. There was a net increase of only 2,000 jobs. This represents a huge relative loss since the U.S. needed 5.7 million jobs just to maintain the same level of employment. More jobs would have been needed to make things better.

At his Jackson Hole speech Bernanke stated how concerned he was at the unemployment problem in the United States and that the Fed was willing to do more. Considering how little impact the Fed's high risk money-printing policies have had and how little seems to have resulted from the numerous stimulus programs that have been implemented, there is no reason to believe either will be improving the economy in the future. They are good for juicing stock prices however — at least in the short term. In the long run the gains will prove to be illusory.

Sources for the above from Table A of the August 2007,  January 2009 and August 2012 Employment Situation report from the BLS. The URLs for the websites are:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/history/empsit_09072007.txt
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_02062009.htm
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm


Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

July Jobs Report Shows U.S. Economic Statistics Are a Joke

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the Labor Department, the U.S. added 163,000 jobs in July. Also according to the Labor Department, the U.S. lost 195,000 jobs in July. So the U.S. economy is either doing OK or it's falling apart big time. Or maybe something between the two is happening. Confused? You should be.

Two separate surveys are used for the employment report. In one, they ask businesses about the amount of hiring they've done in the previous month and in the other the ask people whether or not they have a job. The amount of jobs created for the month is determined by the business survey and the unemployment rate from the survey of households. As more than one article on the July employment report pointed out today, "economists say the business survey is more reliable". So if you think you're unemployed, but an economist says you have a job, the economist is right.

The unemployment rate ticked up to 8.3% according to the household data.  The two surveys have frequently not seemed to match in the past with minimal job gains resulting in drops in the unemployment rate. The Labor Department explained that this occurred because millions of people have left the U.S. labor force since the "recovery" began in 2009 (150,000 more left in July). Even though these people are unemployed, they are not counted as unemployed and this makes the unemployment rate look better. Why millions of people would stop looking for work during a "recovery" has never been answered. Usually, this type of behavior takes place during depressions.

The Labor Department did not discuss the massive discrepancy between its two employment surveys in its press release. Instead it gave a rosy assessment of all the jobs created last month. This included 25,000 new jobs in manufacturing, even though the recent ISM Manufacturing report (a private survey) indicated U.S. manufacturing activity shrank last month.  So an industry that is losing business is hiring lots of new workers. That certainly makes a lot of sense all right.

One possible explanation for the discrepancy was that "inappropriate" statistical adjustments were made to the numbers in the business survey. While one should never rule out gross incompetence when discussing the output of the government statistical offices, a more cynical person might think that there was a purposeful effort to produce better numbers than actually exist because it's an election year. After all, those pesky downward revisions months later never get any notice from the press and the ugly truth can always be told later when no one is paying attention (and after they've voted).

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment — The Spring of Discontent

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the BLS, the U.S. economy created only 69,000 jobs in May 2012. The previous two months were revised down, March from 154,000 to 143,000, and the April from 115,000 to 77,000. Although the U.S. economy is not creating enough jobs for new entrants into the labor force, the BLS claimed the unemployment rate was only 8.2%.

Early in the year, the mainstream media was filled with reports of the recovering job market and a U.S. economy on the upswing. The average reported monthly job gain was 226,000 a month in the first quarter — a healthy amount if it were true. There was more than enough reason to believe it was not true however. The jobs numbers are seasonally adjusted and the winter was unusually warm meaning the usual large layoffs in industries like construction didn't take place. Nevertheless, the BLS adjusted its figures as if they had.

If the better figures in the winter were created by seasonal adjustments and not a better economy, then the spring figures should consequently be weak. This is exactly what has happened. The telltale sign can be found in the May Construction employment number — down by 28,000 last month when it should have been strong.

Almost all the job gains came from only two sources last month, Health Care and Social Services (33,000)  and Transportation and Warehousing (36,000). Health Care is the only category that consistently added jobs during the Great Recession. If the BLS numbers are projected out to the distant future, almost every American in the labor force will eventually be employed in this field.

As usual, comparisons with five years ago indicate that the U.S. economy is still in serious trouble. There were almost 3.7 million less people employed last month than in May 2007. At the same time, the over-16 noninstitutional population has increased by nearly 11.5 million or around 192,000 per month. Yet, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force has grown by a little over 2.2 million or approximately 37,000 a month. There is a major disconnect between those numbers and it indicates that a lot more Americans are unemployed than the BLS headline number indicates.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

April 2012 Jobs, Labor Force Continues to Drop

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The BLS release the employment situation for April 2012 this morning. The report showed that 115,000 jobs were created last month and the current unemployment rate is 8.1%. The big story however was the incredible number of people leaving the U.S. labor force  — almost ten million in the last five years.

Looking at any of the macro numbers since the Great Recession began in December 2007 indicates that the employment situation in the United States is severely challenged. People are leaving the labor force in droves. The participation rate continues to fall as well. This does not happen during economic recoveries. It happens during recessions and depressions. Not only have these numbers trended in the wrong direction since the "recovery" supposedly began in mid-2009, but there has been an acceleration.

These trends are hidden because large numbers of people enter the labor force because of school graduation and immigration. When balanced against the number of people retiring, the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 new jobs every month to keep the employment situation steady. It has rarely met or exceeded this number in the last four years, yet the unemployment rate reported by the BLS has declined significantly. This can only happen because large numbers of people have left the labor force (a sign of economic stress).

According to Table A of the BLS employment reports, there were 78,711,000 Americans not in the labor force in April 2007. In April 2008, four months after the Great Recession began, this number had risen to 79,241,000. In April 2009 just before the supposed recovery started, 80,554,000 Americans were not in the labor force.  This loss of less than two million during a recession isn't surprising . What is surprising is what happened during the recovery.

After almost a year of recovery, the number of people not in the labor force grew to 82,614,000. This was an increase of more than two million, a number greater than the loss during the previous two years that included the recession. Then in April 2011 after another year of recovery, 85,726,000 Americans were not in the U.S. labor force — an increase of over three million in only one year. Now in April 2012, 88,419,000 were not in the labor force. This was an increase of almost three million in one year.

In the five years since April 2007, 9,708,000 Americans have left the U.S. labor force. During this period the labor force should have grown approximately 9,000,000 (60 times 150,000). The picture these numbers present are one of an economy in severe decline. Don't expect to hear this from the U.S. government however. Politicians don't get reelected by reporting bad news.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Only Suprise for March Employment Was that it Wasn't Even Worse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

According to the BLS, the U.S. created only 120,000 non-farm jobs in March. The mainstream media cited this figure as a surprise because it was well below expectations. The real surprise was that the number wasn't even worse.

Winter month employment numbers came in at the 200,000 level and this was trumpeted as evidence that the economy was finally gaining steam. There were two problems will this line of reasoning. The first is that the U.S. needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month for the unemployment rate to stay even (this balances the loss of people retiring with new students and legal immigrants entering the job market).  In order to put any serious dent in the massive amount of unemployment that exists the monthly number of jobs being created needs to be well over 200,000. The second problem was the unusually warm weather during the winter that magnified the impact of the seasonal adjustments.

If seasonal adjustments boosted the numbers in January and February, then lower numbers should be expected in the normally warmer spring months. The weak March number seems to be bearing this out. It is interesting to note that the Retail Trade category lost 34,000 jobs in March. This does not support the idea that retail sales have actually been strong as has been claimed, but that the numbers have instead been artificially boosted by inflation. Retail employment is prone to large swings due to seasonal factors.

The official unemployment rate fell to 8.2% from 8.3%. The obvious question is how can this happen if less than 150,000 jobs were created and that's the amount needed for things to remain in equilibrium? It can only occur if more people than expected leave the labor market. This happened again last month  as has been the case during the entire economic "recovery"(millions of people have left the U.S labor market since the Great Recession began). The mass exodus from the labor market creates a huge reservoir of unemployed waiting to reenter the market if conditions actually improve. This reentry could keep the unemployment rate from falling well into the decade.

People of course do not leave the labor market in droves when the economy is on an upswing. The continued shrinkage of the labor market indicates an economic downturn. Don't expect to hear that from either the U.S. government or the cheerleading mainstream media. Politicians don't get reelected by telling the public bad news.

A key question that usually goes unexamined in reporting about the jobs numbers is the high price the U.S. taxpayer and consumer will be paying in the future for the jobs being created today. The U.S. has run deficits of $1.3 trillion or more since 2009. Pumping all of that money into the economy will of course create jobs, but at what cost?  Unless there is a free lunch, that money will have to be paid back either through higher taxes or higher inflation. Both will lead to lower job creation in the coming years.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Non-farmPayrolls -- The Statistical Illusion of Jobs

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Employment Report for December 2011 was released today with a glowing press release from the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics).  The highlight of the report was the 42,000 courier and messengers jobs created last month and the claim that the unemployment rate fell to 8.5%

Statistics can easily be manipulated and it is not unknown for political regimes to do so in order to hold on to power (and 2012 is an election year in the U.S.). After all, it is much easier to change a number than to fix the underlying problem the number represents. Fortunately, the BLS publishes a number of statistical Tables with each monthly report that can be used to check its calculations.

When the Great Recession began in December 2007, the civilian non-institutional population of the United States was 189,993,000. At that time, the number of people in the U.S. labor force was 125,588,000. As of December 2011, the BLS states that the employment population ratio for the U.S. is 58.5% (0.585). The non-institutional population of the U.S. was reported at 193,682,000 or 3,689,000 higher than it was in December 2007. The labor force in December 2007 was 125,334,000 and multiplying the increase in the U.S. population in the intervening four years by the employment population ratio indicates that the labor force should have increased by 2,158,000 to 127,492,000.  However, the BLS reports the U.S. labor force last month was 124,114,000. More than three million people are missing from its figures.

The smaller the labor force is, the better the headline unemployment rate becomes. The BLS claims these three million plus people left the labor force and this justifies purging them from the statistics. There is a problem with their line of reasoning however. Large numbers of people only leave a labor force during periods of severe economic distress.  It does not happen during economic recovery. It does not indicate an employment situation that is improving.  Yet, the BLS produces numbers showing things are getting better when this happens. This violates the first rule of statistics -- the results must reflect reality. The BLS numbers do not.

Dividing the number of employed in December 2011 by the size of the labor force that should exist based on the population numbers produces an unemployment rate of 9.6%, not 8.5%. This is the headline number that should be reported. If the BLS wants to insist however that more than three million people have indeed left the labor force (and this has continued in the last year -- the size of the labor force in December 2011 is smaller than it was in December 2010), it should also make it clear that this indicates that there has been an ongoing recession and no economic recovery has taken place. Both can't happen at the same time, except for a brief period. Either the economic recovery story is a lie or there hasn't been a shrinking labor force. 

While mainstream economists will insist that employment is a lagging indicator (more than two years is some lag), this has only been the case in the U.S. years after statistical "improvements" were introduced in the 1980s and 1990s in how government economic numbers were determined. Before that, employment recovered with improving GDP as should be the case. If you think about it, the term jobless recovery makes as much sense as tall midget or genius moron.

The improvement in the weekly unemployment claims is also being cited as evidence of an improving jobs picture. It would be more accurate to say that it is evidence of a jobs picture than can't continue to get worse. As I have stated since at least mid-2010, the weekly claims number will regress toward the mean (move to its long-term average) because eventually there will be few workers who remain to be laid off. After being elevated for several years, the only way that weekly claims  can now increase is with a big jump in bankruptcies. This will be avoided as long as the economy holds steady.

What is keeping the U.S. economy from getting worse is the unprecedented budget deficits that the U.S. is running. If you spend an extra $1.3 trillion dollars that you don't have as the U.S. did in 2011, this will certainly stimulate the economy in the short-term since much of this money winds up in consumer pockets and they spend it.  According to the non-farm payrolls report for December, the U.S. is not exactly getting good value for this money. Unless of course, you think low-paying courier and messenger jobs should be the cornerstone of the economy.


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
 Organizer, New York Investing meetup
 http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Why the U.S. Unemployment Numbers Can't Be Trusted

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

There is more fantasy in the U.S. employment numbers than in a Harry Potter novel. According to the BLS, the U.S. added 120,000 jobs in November 2011 and the unemployment rate fell by 0.4%. This is not possible.

The U.S. economy needs to create approximately 150,000 jobs a month to keep the unemployment rate steady based on new entrants into the labor force (the oft cited 200,000 figure is based on past conditions that are no longer applicable). According to official sources, the U.S. added 131,000 jobs a month in 2011. This is better than in previous years, but still not enough to reduce the unemployment rate. Yet, the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) claims the unemployment rate is dropping and fell from 9.0% to 8.6% in November. How is this possible?

Well, first of all, it isn't. These numbers were created — and "created" is a very appropriate word in this case — by claiming that large numbers of workers left the U.S. labor force. At the same time, the U.S. government has stated that an economic recovery has takien place. A country's labor force does not shrink during recoveries, it grows. This has not happened during the current U.S. "recovery".

The U.S. labor force had approximately six million fewer workers in November 2011 than it did in November 2007. Four years ago, 146,793,000 people were employed in the U.S. In November 2011, only 140,987,000 had jobs. This makes no sense if a recovery has taken place. It does make sense however if there is an ongoing recession and government statisticians have decided to massage the numbers for political reasons.

On the flip side, there were 79,069,00 people not in the labor force in November 2007 and today that number is 86,757,000 — almost eight million greater. The labor force of the U.S. should not be shrinking because the number of students and immigrants looking for jobs exceeds the number of people retiring. People do leave the labor force though if they have determined that there simply are no jobs to be found. The recent Consumer Confidence survey from the Conference Board indicated that less than 6% of Americans thought jobs were currently plentiful. 

In November 2011 alone, the BLS claims that the U.S. labor force dropped by almost a net 600,000. This helped reduce the reported unemployment rate to 8.6%. This form of statistical manipulation is something that might be expected in a corrupt third-world backwater. Apparently, this is the standard that Washington is now adhearing to for its statistical reporting. 

 
Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any securi

Is October's Unemployment Rate Really 12.7%?

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The BLS released its non-farm payroll figures for October today and they stated that 80,000 jobs were created and that the U.S. unemployment rate was 9.0%. There are reasons to believe that this number is actually as high as 12.7%.

Except for February and March of this year, the unemployment rate (the U-3 number) has been 9.0% or higher since May 2009. It hasn't risen well into the double digits because large numbers of workers have supposedly left the labor force and these people are not counted as unemployed. If we go back four years to just before the Great Recession began, we find that in October 2007 there were 145,937,000 employed Americans over 16 and 79,506,000 were not in the labor force. Now in October 2011, there are 140,302,000 employed people and 86,071,000 not in the labor force. You can see the figures here: http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab1.htm.

So in the last four years the American economy has had a net loss of 5,635,000 jobs. This huge loss hasn't shown up in an escalating unemployment rate because at the same time a net 6,565,000 people have supposedly left the labor force. The BLS conveniently does not count them as unemployed even though they do not have jobs. If we included them in the unemployment calculations, the unemployment rate for October would be 12.7%. This should not be confused with the underemployment rate (known as U-6) which includes people working part-time, but who want full-time jobs. This number was 16.2% last month.

A case could be made that the U.S. labor force should be shrinking because more people are retiring than there are graduating students. There are approximately 3.5 million people reaching age 65 (not all of whom retire and many of whom didn't work) and only about 3.2 million students graduating high school currently (eventually most of them enter the labor force). While retirees have the advantage, there are also approximately a net 1.3 million immigrants coming into the U.S. every year and a disproportionate number of them are younger adults of employment age. The labor force should at least be steady, if not growing slowly. Instead, BLS figures indicate a rapid shrinkage is taking place.

It would be highly unusual for the labor force to decline at all during a recovery. When the economy is strong, people on the margins go out looking for jobs. For the labor force to drop by millions indicates an extremely weak economy.  So, if the U.S. labor force has six and a half million fewer workers than it did four years ago, no significant recovery has taken place. If the labor force hasn't dropped by as much as the BLS claims, then the unemployment rate is in the double digits and this also indicates no significant recovery has taken place. While it seems more likely than the true unemployment rate is closer to 13% than 9%, either figure indicates that the U.S. economy is still recessionary.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

June Employment Report: Where are the Graduating Students?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Every May and June millions of students graduate from high school and college and enter the U.S. labor force swelling the numbers. Yet in the just released employment report for June, the BLS claimed the labor force decreased by 652,000 last month. This followed a decrease of 286,000 in May. This of course is not possible unless the U.S. economy is in the midst of a depression.

So where did the all the recent graduates go? One place most of them didn't go was to a place of employment. A survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers found only 40% of new college graduates had a job offer before leaving school in 2010. This compares to two-thirds in pre-recession 2007.  High school graduates not going to college probably didn't do much better. The BLS lists the unemployment rate for those between 16 and 19 as 25.7%.

According to the Statistical Abstract of the United States, 3.3 million students graduated high school and another 3.3 million received college degrees in 2010. While not all of these people would have entered the labor force, it can be assumed that at least a few million did in the last two months. Nevertheless, the BLS claims that there were almost a million less people in the U.S. labor force in June than there were in April. This huge drop in participants caused the reported unemployment rate to drop to 9.5% in June since people who leave the labor force aren't counted as unemployed. The Bureau explained these disappearing participants as people who gave up looking for jobs because none were available for them - not exactly an indication of a recovering job market.

BLS figures further show that there were 301,000 less employed Americans in June than there were in May (see http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm). The headline number reported a loss of only 125,000 jobs however. The BLS explained this away as a loss of 225,000 census jobs and claimed that the private sector added 83,000 jobs. If you use the 301,000 figure though, it looks like there was a loss of approximately 83,000 private sector jobs.

The insane contradictions in the BLS figures can partially be explained by 'seasonal adjustments'. This is one of the statistical tricks the bureau utilizes to try to make a sow's ear look like a silk purse. Seasonal adjustments make it possible for millions of graduating students to enter the labor force and the BLS to report that the labor force shrank while this was happening.

The employment numbers should be seen for what they are - absurd results created by gross manipulation. Many people however don't wish to believe this takes place despite all the evidence. Those are the people who really need to worry about the current state of the U.S. economy. If the labor force can decline by a million when millions or graduating students are entering it, this means it really lost maybe four or five million workers in a two-month period. That indicates that things are worse in the U.S. now than they were during the Great Depression in the 1930s.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.