March Consumer Confidence and the Housing Market

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Conference Board's March Consumer Confidence number came in at 70.2 this morning. As has been the case for the last four years, hope for a better tomorrow is holding the number up. It certainly wasn't the real estate market, which has been shown to be weak once again.

A healthy consumer confidence number is 90 or above. This number has not been this high at any point since the "recovery" began in mid-2009. It has instead ranged between a deep recession level in the 40's and a milder recession level in the 70s. What has caused repeated rises and falls in the number are changes in the Expectations sub-component. How people view current conditions has remained dismally low.

This is how it works. Consumers are bombarded with stories from the news media about how the economy is heading up and then they are asked if they think the economy will be better in six months. Not surprisingly, many answer yes and this causes overall consumer confidence to rise. As the months go on and they don't see any real improvement they become more pessimistic and they don't  think things will be better in six months and then the number falls. This scenario has played out multiple times in the last three years.

Expectations for a better future zoomed to 88.4 in February, but fell back somewhat to 83.0 in March.
The Present Situation Index, however, was a very poor 46.4 in February, but rose to 51.0 in March. While these numbers are not good, they are much better than some Present Situation numbers during the "recovery" year of 2011. Those were at depression levels. The worst number last year however wasn't the Present Situation one, but the Jobs Are Plentiful reading. This was statistically indistinguishable from zero at one point. Since negative numbers are not possible in the report, the reading has not gotten worse.

There have been two running news stories since the beginning of 2012 that have buoyed the consumer confidence numbers — an improving employment situation and a recovering housing market. Both of these may prove to be illusory. The hype about the real estate recovery is already starting to unravel. 

U.S. home prices dropped for the fifth month in a row in January according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index. They are now down 34.4% from their highs in July 2006. The National Association of Realtors has reported that existing home sales slipped 0.9 percent in February to an annual rate of 4.59 million units. As for pending contracts, a whopping 33% were canceled last month. While many have pointed out that home sales were much better in February 2012 than they were in February 2011, they usually neglect to mention that most of the U.S. was snowed in last February and this February was one of the warmest on record. The real recovery seems to have been one in the weather.

The sharp differences in weather from year to year can impact any economic statistic that is seasonally adjusted. The employment numbers are in this category. They may have been juiced up by a warmer winter as well. If so, U.S. consumers will start to become less hopeful about the future as they have before and the confidence numbers will start drifting down later this year.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

House of Cards Falling Down

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. housing data for May was out today and no matter how you look at it the report was bleak. The number of houses under construction fell to a record low of 475,000. The 17% drop in single-family homes was the biggest since the 1990-91 recession. Applications for permits were the lowest in a year.

There were hints that the housing market was already in trouble last month when construction permits fell 10%. They dropped an additional 5.9% in May. The federal government housing tax credit expired at the end of April and builders clearly understood that without government subsidies consumers were going to take a hike. And take a hike they did - mortgage purchase applications peaked on April 30th, the last day of the tax credit, and are now at a 13-year low even though mortgage rates have come down.

Housing starts are now down 70% from their peak even though the federal government has made Herculean efforts to support the market. U.S. housing was in a bubble and there is no case in history of a bubble being reinflated immediately after a collapse. Trying to do so is equivalent to pouring money down a drain. There is no better example of this than ongoing federal government subsidies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Bloomberg has just estimated that these will reach $1 trillion (more than the entire TARP program). U.S. taxpayers are footing the bill. Fannie and Freddie are going to be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange, probably on July 8th. So much for unlimited financial support from the federal government leading to success.

Housing was the epicenter of the Credit Crisis collapse. The market has not returned to health and it is not likely that it will for many more years. The overall U.S. economy itself is now on the verge of turning down again as well. ECRI leading indicators turned negative last week. The last time they did so was in September 2007. A recession began two months later. So far, the ECRI is downplaying its own data and claiming that its numbers indicate that the U.S. economy will be experiencing 'slow' growth in the next six to nine months.

The 'fast' growth that has been occurring in U.S. GDP has been based on changes in inventory levels and not an actual recovery in the private sector. In Q4 2009, a slower decline (yes decline) in inventories was responsible for approximately two-thirds of the increase in GDP. In Q1 2010, inventory replenishment accounted for more than half of the growth.

While the Credit Crisis had its origins in the U.S., the new unfolding global financial crisis is centered in Europe. There are reports that the IMF and the U.S. Treasury are in talks about a 250 billion euro bailout for Spain. While Spain and the IMF have denied the report, the market indicates some serious problem exists. The risk premium on Spanish bonds over equivalent German bonds has risen to the highest level since the creation of the euro.

Government spending can certainly make the economy or any given sector of it better for a while. Based on the evidence so far, the government has to continually spend or the economy falls right back down to where it was before the spending took place. Even reduced, but still substantial spending is not likely to be enough to keep the economy in the black under such circumstances. Governments have faced similar problems many times in history and have seen that major inflation is the outcome of utilizing this approach. Apparently the world's current regimes are now determined to make the same mistakes again.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

New Homes Reveal Old Problems With Government Statistics

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The U.S. New Home Sales report released on December 23rd indicated a drop of 11.3% in November. Analysts had expected a gain. According to the previous Commerce Department reports, new homes sales had risen every month since April. They were expected to rise again in November because a government tax credit for new home buyers was originally scheduled to end in the beginning of the month (it was extended to June 2010), so analysts had assumed that there would be a rush of last minute buyers. There may have been and without them the drop might have been much greater than 11%.

New Home Sales is almost certainly the most inaccurate of the economic reports issued by the U.S. government. I can say this with some certainty because it would be almost impossible to produce something more error ridden. One of the major news services stated in their coverage of the November report, "Government statisticians have low confidence in the monthly report, which is subject to large revisions and large sampling and other statistical errors. In most months the government isn't sure whether sales rose or fell." Read that last sentence again and then consider that if the U.S. government is willing to issue an official report on housing that is about as accurate as picking numbers randomly out of a hat, how much can you trust the GDP, CPI, PPI (the two major inflation reports) and Non-Farms Payroll reports. Also note that the mainstream financial media seems to be well aware of the lack of reliability, but doesn't mention it except on very rare occasions when the news is particularly bad.

If the New Homes Sales report is so prone to inaccuracy why not just fix the problem? This is indeed a good question. The statistical tools to make this report better have been known for decades and yet the U.S. Commerce department doesn't seem to be able to apply them. It can be assumed that this isn't done because they don't want to do it. Statistically sloppy work is extremely prone to manipulation after all, solidly done work is not.

When confronted with this problem, you will get a more accurate picture of what is taking place by looking at many months of data in aggregate and comparing it to the previous year (the errors will cancel out at least to some extent). In the first 11 months of 2009, new home sales are down 24% from the first 11 months in 2008. Inventories have been falling throughout 2009 and are now at 38 year lows. The number of homes under construction or planned for construction have fallen to a record low. If new home sales were rising between April to October as the Commerce Department reported, why are home builders building fewer and fewer homes? That doesn't look like an industry in recovery as the public has been repeatedly told. For some reason, we seem to have gotten a glimpse of the true state of the housing market in the November New Home Sales report. Perhaps the guy in charge of producing cheerful statistics was on vacation? Somehow, I'm sure he'll be back soon.

Disclosure: Not relevant.

NEXT: Investing Themes for the Next Decade

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The House of Cards Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Housing continues to deteriorate. There are now 12 million homes in the U.S. with mortgages that exceed their value. This pool of houses which is particularly vulnerable to abandonment and foreclosure represents almost a quarter of all mortgaged residential properties . By the end of 2008, it is estimated that there will be a million bank owned properties for sale, which would represent a third of homes on the market. The situation is already much worse in trend leader California, where over 50% of existing home sales were foreclosed properties last month. Median prices there have dropped 34% from the high so far. The rest of the U.S. could follow California, although increased government efforts to prop up the housing market are trying to prevent further erosion.

Last quarter 766,000 U.S. home owners received at least one foreclosure notice. Only six states accounted for a majority of foreclosure activity - Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nevada, and Ohio. The last four of these states are battlegrounds in the presidential election and Arizona would be too if McCain didn't represent it in the senate (nevertheless McCain's lead in the polls there is surprisingly small even though Arizona is one of the states most likely to support a Republican candidate for president). Foreclosures were worse in the beginning of the quarter and the rate even declined by 12% in September. While it looks like the number of foreclosure notices will be lower in the future, this won't be taking place because of improvements in the housing market.

The rate is being lowered by new laws have been enacted in a number of states to delay the repossession process and the FHA is attempting to renegotiate loan terms for a number of mortgage holders at risk. Foreclosure statistics are indeed very much affected by the ease of foreclosure which varies by state and should not be considered as an absolute indication of the strength of a state's housing market. New York for instance currently has a low foreclosure rate because it is necessary to go to court first and this means a foreclosure can take well over a year, longer if the judge doesn't wish to be cooperative. The FDIC is also trying to delay or prevent foreclosures. The first thing they did when they took over IndyMac was to stop all foreclosures and they are continuing to do so.

Delay does not mean preventing the inevitable however, it usually only means it only takes more time to get there. U.S. housing was in a bubble and prices became way extended on the upside. They are going to have to come down at least to the long-term mean - and we still have a long way to go to get there - before a sustainable recovery in real estate is possible. This will be an important precondition to a healthy economy as well. A look at the past suggests this linkage. Housing prices fell approximately 50% nationally in the U.S. between 1930 and 1940. The economy wasn't in such great shape then either.

NEXT: Black Friday Panic Grips World Markets

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Subprime Housing Leads to Subprime Financial Institutions

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

The housing reports released in October 2007 which indicated the state of the market in September were even more dismal than those of the prior month. Nationally, foreclosures had doubled year over year and they had gone up as much as 500% to a 1000% in the worst hit bubble areas of the housing market. Existing Home Sales were down 23% nationally. Although also down substantially, New Home Sales were nevertheless reported as increasing (huh?).

The September 2007 New Home Sales report was a classic example of how the financial media frequently reports bad news as good and hopes people only read the headlines and not the fine print. The New Home Sales report originally indicated that there had been 795,000 houses sold in August. The report then indicated 770,000 houses sold in September. This drop of 25,000 was heralded by the media as a increase of 4.8%. This happened because the sales figures for August were revised downward to 735,000 (by almost 8%, an incredible error for a statistical report) and the September figure was above this number, so this indicated that sales were going up! The first thought of any rational person should of course have been, 'if the numbers for August were actually much lower, why shouldn't the ones for September be much lower as well?' Even a casual look inside the September report lent substantial support that this was indeed the case. Sales in the West, probably the worst hit housing area in the U.S., were supposedly up 38% - a completely absurd number and an indication that the September numbers were being overstated just as the August numbers had been.

Despite the complete devastation in housing sales., median house prices were reported up 2.5%. The statistical tricks that led to this impossible outcome were discussed previously in this blog in the posting, "Housing Market Collapses, but the Statistics Hold Up".

House sales were falling off a cliff because mortgage money was disappearing. By October 2007, 183 mortgage lenders had already closed their doors since the previous December. One that didn't was Countrywide, the largest mortgage lender in the United States and therefore presumably too big to fail. What kept Countrywide afloat was a $2 billion capital infusion in August from Bank of America. Barron's reported that there were rumors that this bailout had been secretly arranged by the U.S. federal government. If so, it would only be the first of many bailouts that the Feds would have to arrange to prop up failing American financial institutions. Shortly thereafter, one of the major British mortgage lenders, Northern Rock, experienced a run on the bank - the first in England since the 19th century. Northern Rock had been known for it 125% mortgages and when word got out that it needed an emergency loan from the Bank of England, depositors queued up for blocks desperate to get their money out. While the Bank of England directly provided capital to keep Northern Rock going, this approach would prove to be no more successful than the more circumspect American one. Both Countrywide and Northern Rock would barely survive into 2008.

Next: What Banks and Enron Had Common

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup

For more about us, please go to: http://investing.meetup.com/21