The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
China has been the economic engine powering the global recovery, but the engine may be sputtering based on the behavior of Chinese stocks. The Shanghai Composite has been trading in bear market territory since May 6th.
Unlike the U.S., UK and EU, which have service based economies, China's economy is heavily industrial. What takes place in China provides important information about the state of the global manufacturing. Activity in China is a key driver of the markets for industrial metals, materials, and energy. It was just announced in the media that China has become the largest consumer of energy commodities globally; pulling ahead of the United States, but the Chinese government has denied it.
Since the major Western economies and the Chinese economy have different compositions, it is reasonable to assume that their stock markets could trade in different patterns. The bull market peaks came at about the same time however. The Shanghai market hit a bottom around 1000 in mid-2005 and entered a bubble pattern in 2006, which continued until a high of 6036 was reached on October 17, 2007. As the bubble burst, Chinese stocks fell 72% until the market reached 1707 on November 4, 2008. Unlike U.S. stocks, which continued to fall until they reached their bottom in early March 2009, the Shanghai composite then began to rally. The prices for metals, materials, and the companies that produce them tended to follow the Chinese market and not Western markets - investors should keep this in mind for future reference. Oil didn't bottom until mid-February 2009 though.
Not only did the Shanghai Composite hit its low four months earlier than the U.S. market, its high from the rally that followed took place well before the top in Western stock markets. So far, Chinese stocks topped at 3471 on August 4, 2009. U.S. stocks peaked on April 26, 2010. By the end of August 2009 the Shanghai index was down more than 20% on a closing basis, but only briefly. After some recovery, stocks entered bear market territory again for a few days in the end of September. They then moved up and traded with less than a 20% drop from the August peak for many months until May 6th of this year. Chinese stocks have continued to trade at a bear market loss since that date.
Poor performance of Chinese stocks indicates weakness in the global industrial economy. Most commodities are likely to suffer declines as a result. This has more significance for the U.S. currently than it usually would ordinarily because the industrial sector of the economy has performed best during the recovery. The much bigger service sector has remained fairly anemic despite $3 trillion of federal deficit spending in fiscal years 2009 and 2010. If U.S. manufacturing turns negative, and behavior of Chinese stocks indicates is might, the U.S. economy is likely to follow.
Disclosure: No positions.
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Showing posts with label Shanghai Composite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shanghai Composite. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Why Decisive Action is Needed to Save the Euro
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.
This morning, the euro has traded as low as 126.55 to the dollar. The currency has extremely strong support around the 125 level, so some bounce up from there should be expected. While some short-term relief is likely, in the longer term the survival of the euro is threatened until some significant changes are made in how the currency union is managed.
The current problems in Greece have exposed the flaws behind the euro. The currency was created with a set of rules that were meant to insure stability, but the eurozone seems incapable of enforcing its own standards. Because of this, the euro is losing credibility in the world markets. At this point, the EU has only two choices if it wants to regain an image of responsibility for its currency. It can either enforce its maximum 3% budget deficit to GDP limit or change the limit to something that can be accomplished and make sure all member countries stick to it. The Credit Crisis has made the first choice impossible, but the EU has yet to try to deal with this realistically. The second choice, while it would tend to lower the value of the euro, would allow it to keep functioning as a viable currency.
So far, the EU has chosen neither of these alternatives. Instead it has decided to take the bailout route. This is only a stopgap measure to deal with the problem and is not a workable solution in the long-term. It can be done for Greece, although it will be expensive, because Greece represents only 2% of the EU economy. It also could be implemented for Portugal and maybe even Ireland. At that point though the amount of bailout money being spent would be tremendous and would certainly create an inflationary strain on the entire eurozone. As the situation in Greece has shown, the cost of an actual bailout will be much larger than initial estimates. The funds for a proposed Greek bailout have already almost tripled from the first proposal and they will ultimately be much higher. The bailout solution has its limits though. Spain will be the breaking point. Italy is not even possible.
A good question is: Why are bailouts even being considered? Dollarization could easily have solved the problem - let Greece continue to use the euro, but remove it from the currency union (Greece would almost certainly have defaulted on its debt already if this had been done early on). The answer of course lies in who is really being bailed out. French and German banks together have funded the majority of external Greek government debt. They also have a decent chunk of Portuguese government debt. Just as was the case with the subprime crisis in the United States, the big banks are the ones being bailed out. Most large European banks were already bailed out is some way, shape, or form then as well. This would represent a second series of bailouts for them.
At some point, the EU has to make some tough decisions. This is something that governments throughout the world seem incapable of doing these days. Up to now, the governing body in Brussels has reacted like a deer caught in the headlights - frozen and incapable of action. Greece not only violated the EU's debt to GDP limits by a factor of four, but also lied to the EU about its numbers for many years. Instead of being punished for these serious infractions and being thrown out of the currency union, the EU and IMF have decided the best course is to reward Greece for its bad behavior with a bailout. The EU is sending the markets a clear message that their supposed standards behind the euro are meaningless. The market, not surprisingly, has sold down the euro in response.
As I said repeatedly during the Credit Crisis, there is no such thing as a single bailout. This will certainly be the case in the eurozone. If the EU wants to save its currency, it will have to take decisive action at some point. If it won't do so now, it will have to do so once it becomes obvious to them that the bailout approach is just too costly. Unfortunately for the rest of us, this can have a serious negative impact on world markets at any point in time. The Nikkei in Japan was down 3.3% last night and China's Shanghai composite was down 4.1% and they are not anywhere near Europe.
Disclosure: No position in euros.
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
This morning, the euro has traded as low as 126.55 to the dollar. The currency has extremely strong support around the 125 level, so some bounce up from there should be expected. While some short-term relief is likely, in the longer term the survival of the euro is threatened until some significant changes are made in how the currency union is managed.
The current problems in Greece have exposed the flaws behind the euro. The currency was created with a set of rules that were meant to insure stability, but the eurozone seems incapable of enforcing its own standards. Because of this, the euro is losing credibility in the world markets. At this point, the EU has only two choices if it wants to regain an image of responsibility for its currency. It can either enforce its maximum 3% budget deficit to GDP limit or change the limit to something that can be accomplished and make sure all member countries stick to it. The Credit Crisis has made the first choice impossible, but the EU has yet to try to deal with this realistically. The second choice, while it would tend to lower the value of the euro, would allow it to keep functioning as a viable currency.
So far, the EU has chosen neither of these alternatives. Instead it has decided to take the bailout route. This is only a stopgap measure to deal with the problem and is not a workable solution in the long-term. It can be done for Greece, although it will be expensive, because Greece represents only 2% of the EU economy. It also could be implemented for Portugal and maybe even Ireland. At that point though the amount of bailout money being spent would be tremendous and would certainly create an inflationary strain on the entire eurozone. As the situation in Greece has shown, the cost of an actual bailout will be much larger than initial estimates. The funds for a proposed Greek bailout have already almost tripled from the first proposal and they will ultimately be much higher. The bailout solution has its limits though. Spain will be the breaking point. Italy is not even possible.
A good question is: Why are bailouts even being considered? Dollarization could easily have solved the problem - let Greece continue to use the euro, but remove it from the currency union (Greece would almost certainly have defaulted on its debt already if this had been done early on). The answer of course lies in who is really being bailed out. French and German banks together have funded the majority of external Greek government debt. They also have a decent chunk of Portuguese government debt. Just as was the case with the subprime crisis in the United States, the big banks are the ones being bailed out. Most large European banks were already bailed out is some way, shape, or form then as well. This would represent a second series of bailouts for them.
At some point, the EU has to make some tough decisions. This is something that governments throughout the world seem incapable of doing these days. Up to now, the governing body in Brussels has reacted like a deer caught in the headlights - frozen and incapable of action. Greece not only violated the EU's debt to GDP limits by a factor of four, but also lied to the EU about its numbers for many years. Instead of being punished for these serious infractions and being thrown out of the currency union, the EU and IMF have decided the best course is to reward Greece for its bad behavior with a bailout. The EU is sending the markets a clear message that their supposed standards behind the euro are meaningless. The market, not surprisingly, has sold down the euro in response.
As I said repeatedly during the Credit Crisis, there is no such thing as a single bailout. This will certainly be the case in the eurozone. If the EU wants to save its currency, it will have to take decisive action at some point. If it won't do so now, it will have to do so once it becomes obvious to them that the bailout approach is just too costly. Unfortunately for the rest of us, this can have a serious negative impact on world markets at any point in time. The Nikkei in Japan was down 3.3% last night and China's Shanghai composite was down 4.1% and they are not anywhere near Europe.
Disclosure: No position in euros.
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Stock Market Gappy, Inflation Worries Surface
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Our Video Related to this Blog:
Global market weakness started again in Asia last night. At one point, the Shanghai market was down more than 5%, but recovered slightly to close down 4.3%. So far this month Shanghai is down almost 20%. Hong Kong was down 1.7% and the Nikkei in Japan was down 0.8%. This was a greater amount that their dead cat bounces on Tuesday. Europe was down strongly this morning and the U.S. markets gapped down again, just like they did on Monday. Strong buying came in immediately to fill the gap. The gap on Monday was partially filled in Tuesday's trading.
Since the market has had a long rise and has been flat for a few weeks now, a gap down where the gap is not filled would be a breakaway gap (or more appropriately a breakdown gap). This is the only type of gap that doesn't have to be filled. The breakdown gap establishes a new ceiling for trading and indicates the beginning of a longer sell off. This hasn't happened yet, but there were two almosts in the last three days. The VIX (volatility index) had its third spike up on the open in three days. When the VIX goes up, stocks go down. The dollar was just above 79.00 recently, still keeping above its 78.33 breakdown level.
A survey of fund managers by Merrill Lynch indicates fund manager optimism is at its highest level in 6 years. This is a contrary indicator. Fund managers love buying at the top and selling at the bottom, which is why as much as 85% of mutual funds fail to beat the S&P 500 in any given year. This doesn't mean the market is going down next week however. Within the next few months though is quite possible.
There are some important articles out today about inflation. One states the Fed has no exit strategy from its stimulus programs (in fact, it is extending them). The one getting the most attention though is an Op-Ed piece by Warren Buffet in the New York Times, entitled "The Greenback Effect". Buffett very gently points out that printing money can cause inflation and there could be trouble on the horizon for the U.S. While the New York Investing meetup has been pointing this out for the last two years, this reality-based view is not supported by the government, Wall Street or the mainstream media. Buffet deserves credit for stating the obvious.
NEXT: Oil Up; Retail, Employment and Economy Down
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Japan Climbs Out of Recession...Again
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Our Video Related to this Blog:
Japan's second quarter GDP figures were released last night and indicated the economy grew by 3.6% on an annual basis. This was after a 14.2% decline in the first quarter. What caused the turnaround? 'Government stimulus measures' as usual were cited and a big increase in export growth. Internal demand remains incredibly weak. Japan joins Germany and France, which also climbed out of recession thanks to government stimulus measures. The United States, the king of government stimulus measures, is predicted to join them in the third quarter.
This is not the first time Japan has 'recovered' from or avoided recession thanks to government stimulus measures. This also happened in 1993, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2004 and now after the 2008/2009 recession. Japan is very good at recovering from recession. The only problem is that it is even better at falling into recession. Insolvency of the banking system - the current problem in the U.S. is almost identical - is what has caused the two-decade economic nightmare. Residential real estate in Tokyo lost 90% of its value from the bubble top. Top A level commercial properties declined 99%. So far the stock market had a 18 year sell-off there after bottoming last October (assuming it doesn't go lower again). The Nikkei fell 3.1% last night. Hong Kong was down 3.6% and Shanghai down 5.8%. Apparently the good news wasn't good enough.
Problems in the market began last Friday, when U.S. Consumer Confidence suddenly dropped. Economists had predicted it would be going up. Imagine, consumers are becoming less confident even though unemployment is likely to be a major problem for at least another year (by economists own admission) and their income is likely to continue to fall. Who could have predicted that not having a job or money would make consumers less confident? Certainly not U.S. economists. And how are consumers going to increase their spending under such circumstances? Obviously they aren't going to. So much for the 72% of the U.S. GDP (based on 2008) that consumer spending is responsible for getting better. Nevertheless, I have little doubt that U.S. GDP will be positive next quarter - although people who insist on dealing with reality will have trouble understanding how this occurred.
The stock market was buoyed when second quarter U.S. GDP was released a couple of weeks ago. It was a major surprise that the decline was only 1.0%. What caused this better performance? Nothing involved with consumer spending or industrial production (although there were claims that the auto industry was doing better - try not to laugh). Government stimulus measures were the key. Federal government expenditures were up 10.9% in the quarter and state expenditures were up 2.4%. How state expenditures were up when at least 20 states are facing major budgetary problems is not clear. Like Japan though, as long as the U.S. keeps up the government stimulus measures, it will be good at climbing out of recession. It will probably be able to do so over and over and over again in the next decade or two.
NEXT: Monday's Ugly Market Action
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Labels:
2009,
consumer confidence,
GDP,
government stimulus,
Hang Seng,
Japan,
meetup,
New York Investing,
Nikkei,
recession,
recovery,
second quarter,
Shanghai Composite,
third quarter,
U.S.
Monday, November 10, 2008
China Bails Out Asia - at Least for Today
The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.Our Video Related to this Blog:
Finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 20 (nineteen of the world's largest economies, plus the European Union) met in Brazil on Sunday and called for increased government spending to bolster the sagging global economy. The multi trillion dollar bailouts, massive liquidity injections, and sharp rate cuts in the last two months apparently haven't done the trick. To do its part, China promptly announced a $586 billion stimulus plan consisting of spending, subsidies, loser credit, and tax cuts. Unlike the rate cuts in Britain and the ECB last week, when the markets crashed the day they were announced, Asian markets rallied strongly on the news.
Not surprisingly, the Shanghai composite was up the most with a 7.3% gain. It is still down about two-thirds from its high last October, after rising in one of the most spectacular bubbles in history (bubble markets usually need somewhere between an 80% to 98% drop before they can stabilize). The Nikkei rose 5.8% on the news, after having hit a new low in its 18 year drop only recently. Intraday, the Nikkei has had approximately an 83% drop so far from its bubble high in 1990 to its current low. What the final number will be and when it will take place is anybody's guess. The Sensex in India, another bubble market, rose 5.8% as well. The dollar rallied against the Yen and natural resource stocks (inflation indicators) seemed to be the major beneficiaries of China's announcement. BHP Billiton, the world's biggest mining company was up 13%.
As the rally moved along with the sun to Europe, the enthusiasm dampened somewhat. Major European markets are up less than 3% as of this writing. U.S. pre-market futures indicate an even smaller rally here. Of course the Dow already rallied 2.8% on Friday, but this was after a two-day post election drop of around 10% (half of what would be necessary to create a bear market). The news of Circuit City's bankruptcy and AIG's third government bailout, with the total now up to $150 billion, will weigh on the U.S. market if rationality prevails - a dubious presumption at best.
In case there was any doubt previously, the economic policy makers for all the world's large economies are pursuing and will continue to pursue extreme inflationary policies. In many cases, this is being done to try to reinflate collapsing bubbles. There is no short-term likelihood of success in this endeavor. They will be successful however in igniting an inflation bubble. Although this is completely predictable, expect great surprise - and denial - when inflation starts to get out of control.
NEXT: Auto-Asphyxiation - GM, Ford Gasp for Bailout
Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21
This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.
Labels:
AIG,
bailouts,
BHP,
China,
Circuit City,
Group of 20,
liquidity injections,
natural resource,
New York Investing meetup,
Nikkei,
Sensex,
Shanghai Composite,
stimulus plan,
stocks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

