Lying with Statistics: the September Jobs Report

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

One month before the presidential election, there was suddenly a major reversal in unemployment trends that have taken place during the entire administration of the Obama presidency. The figures indicate explosive growth is taking place in the U.S. economy and this has occurred overnight. The explanation of where this growth is coming from or how it has happened is illusive.

Unlike the previous four years, large numbers of jobs were supposedly created last month. Actually that's not exactly the case. The household survey reported 873,000 jobs were created, whereas the business survey reported 114,000 — a typical amount. In previous months, the household survey has actually indicated major job losses. The mainstream media has failed to report this. However, when a number suddenly appears that lacks credibility in the same survey, but that number is positive, it apparently is worth reporting. 

Where did these jobs come from?  It's not clear from the report. It was specifically stated that "manufacturing employment edged down in September". There was a loss of 16,000 jobs, so there is no evidence that U.S. manufacturing is on the upswing. Based on the following statement, 600,000 people were hired part-time last month: "The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) rose from 8.0 million in August to 8.6 million in September". This is a huge change. Where are these part-time workers employed and what were they hired to do? Will they be fired the day after the election?

Perhaps even more amazing is that the BLS reported that the U.S. labor force grew in September 2012 for the first time in years. From August 2007 to August 2012, the U.S. labor force shrank like it would during a depression with a total 9,602,000 people leaving it. It abruptly increased by 418,000 last month. What caused such a large number of people to suddenly influx into the labor force? GDP last quarter barely grew indicating a stagnant U.S. economy.

The number of unemployed persons, at 12.1 million, supposedly decreased by 456,000 in September. The BLS stated that the unemployment rate fell to 7.8% —  the first time it has been below 8.0% since just after President Obama took office. The continual multi-year unemployment rate of over 8.0% has been a major issue in the presidential election.

The numbers in the September employment report are quite fantastic and there is no basis for believing them. Disreputable statisticians can easily produce highly unreliable numbers. If statistics are inconsistent with the past, with each other, have no traceable explanation or seem contradictory with real world observations, they are suspicious. In the case of the September employment report all four criteria have been met. The quality of U.S. economic numbers have been decaying for the last 30 years. They seem to currently be making the transition from manipulation to outright fantasy.

Disclosure: None


Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Manufacturing Goes Flat Throughout the World

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Purchasing manager surveys in a number of countries indicate that the manufacturing sector of the global economy has stalled. Recent readings in Europe, North America, and Asia are either slightly above or slightly below 50, the dividing point between expansion and contraction.

The U.S. ISM survey released on September 1st came in at 50.6, down 0.3 from July. While the number was still clinging to positive territory after 25 months, key components such as New Orders, Production, and Backlog of Orders were in contraction mode. Backlog of Orders was the lowest at 46.0. The highest component, as has been the case throughout the expansion, was Prices -- a measure of inflation.  While this reached an astronomical 82.0 just six months ago in February, it was a relatively tame 55.5 in August.  Not only is the manufacturing index not adjusted for inflation, but higher inflation makes it look better and this has been the case during the entire expansion.  

While manufacturing was still just barely expanding in the U.S., it was slightly contracting in Europe. The August Purchasing Managers Index for the 17-nation eurozone came in at 49.0, down from 50.4 in July.  Germany, the Netherlands and Austria had readings still above the neutral 50 level, while France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, and Spain were just below. The UK, not part of the eurozone, also had a PMI reading of 49.0 in August. This was down from 49.4 in July and was at a 26-month low.

China was either in expansion or in contraction depending on which survey you believe. The official survey produced by the Chinese government had a reading of 50.9, while an independent survey less subject to bias came in at 49.9. In both cases, the numbers are around the no growth level.

If only one region of the world had weakened manufacturing activity, it might not be meaningful. However, when it exists on three continents in major production centers, it is impossible to ignore. There has been an approximate two-year period of expansion fed by various stimulus measures, massive budget deficits, quantitative easing, and rock-bottom interest rates. While the low interest rates are still with us, the stimulus measures have waned and there are now minimal attempts to reign in deficit spending from its outsized levels. Even though there is still a lot of government support for the economy, this still doesn't seem to be enough for manufacturing to grow. 


Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

More 'Good' Pre-Election Economic News

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Consumer income had a nice rise in August thanks to extended unemployment benefits (not regular unemployment benefits). The final budget deficit figures for fiscal year 2010 have been leaked and the U.S. is supposedly only in the hole for a massive $1.3 trillion. The ISM manufacturing index came in at 54.4 and the the mainstream press is citing a strong manufacturing sector as the reason the U.S. stock market had its best September since 1939. Altogether, this news could be summed up as 'stupidity you can believe in'.

By almost every measure except the headline number, the ISM report was a disaster. The highest number inside the report was prices paid, an inflation measure, which came in over 70. Prices apparently went up a lot in August. This component had the biggest increase by far, which wasn't difficult because only one other component went up - inventories. Inventories usually pile up because sales are slowing down. The negative big gains were more than matched with negative big losses in the report. Order backlogs, supplier deliveries, employment, and the production components all had big drops. Well, that certainly should have led to a big stock market rally all right.

As for the supposed improved budget deficit figures, as of this August, $1.377 trillion dollars had already been borrowed to fund the federal government in fiscal year 2010. This number would have been $115 billion larger (for a total of $1.492 trillion) if there hadn't been 'financing by other means'. Financing by other means had a big increase in August and is projected to have another big increase in September. There are also substantial 'off budget outlays'. See http://www.fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0810.pdf for the August Treasury report on 2010 fiscal year spending. Makes you wonder if the U.S. government is using the Enron Accounting Manual to do its books.

Finally, some people might argue that an economy that is dependent on extended unemployment benefits for increased consumer spending could just perhaps be somewhat troubled. Few if any of these people write for the mainstream press of course, which generally treated the news of an increase in consumer income and a rise in the savings rate to 5.8% as just more rosy news. If this is such good news, obviously the U.S. should institute ultra super extended unemployment benefits. After all, look at what these policies have done for Europe – riots in the streets and turmoil in the bond markets. The euro has been rising though and obviously this must be due to improved manufacturing in the U.S., if you follow the logic of the mainstream press. If not, you might just conclude that there is a whole bunch of government manipulation of the markets going on.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Stock Rally in Beginning of Month Ignored Economic Reality

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


U.S. stocks had an impressive rally the first four days of the month and this is generally a bullish indicator.  The rally took place with a backdrop of really ugly economic news however and that is not bullish. Weakness has a way of coming back to haunt the market as European bank news is demonstrating today.

U.S. economic reports for the last few months have been generally bad to awful. Nothing changed last week. While the ISM manufacturing index went up, this supposedly occurred because of a big increase in manufacturing jobs (the inflation component of the report was the actually the biggest gain, but the mainstream media somehow didn't report this negative news). This gain was not corroborated by the government's August employment report, which showed a drop in manufacturing jobs, nor by anecdotal evidence or anything else taking place on the planet earth. The stock market of course rallied strongly on the news.

The ISM non-manufacturing index, which measures the almost four times bigger service sector, didn't get nearly as much media coverage. It barely remained in positive territory. The inflation component, also the highest number in this report, was chiefly responsible for the number not going negative and indicating contraction.  Two components of the report were clearly in contraction however - exports and employment. The service sector losing jobs is a big negative for the overall U.S. economy.

Also lost in the stock buying frenzy was August car sales. They were down 21% year over year. This followed the 27% monthly drop in existing home sales in July and the 33% drop in new home sales in May. Last August was the peak of the Cash for Clunkers program. The numbers for car sales and home sales both demonstrate what happens when government incentives are no longer available in a market. While new homes sales fell to the lowest level ever recorded, August car sales were only at a 28-year low. For those who don't recall, 1982 was when the previous double-dip recession took place.

Government stimulus programs didn't fix the housing and car markets, but merely made them look better. This works for a while, but reality eventually rears its ugly head. A report from Europe today said that "the continent's major banks have more potentially risky government debt on their books than was disclosed during stress tests earlier this year." This wasn't exactly a piece of information that required the skills of Sherlock Holmes to uncover. At the time of their release, the stress tests were roundly criticized as being a phony PR gambit that set the bar so low that any bank not declaring insolvency in the next week would pass. Stocks of course went up on the news back then and today they are going back down.

Economic reality will eventually be reflected in the stock market. As I have said many times however, it's not the economy that drives the stock market in the short term, but liquidity. The Fed obviously kept pushing the 'flood the financial system with liquidity' button in early September. What happens when they stop doing this? See the homes sales and car sales numbers for a hint of how stimulus withdrawal impacts a market.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Sorting Out Contradictory Jobs Information

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Four jobs related reports were released in the first two days of September and they seem to indicate a contradictory view of the U.S. employment situation.

The weekly unemployment claims number was 472,000 for the last week of August, almost exactly the same as the 470,000 figure for the first week of January. Payroll processing firm ADP predicted yesterday that the U.S. private sector lost jobs in August because of a big employment drop in the 'goods producing sector'. At almost the same time, the ISM manufacturing index was released and indicated substantial hiring took place in U.S. manufacturing companies in August. Adding more confusion to the mix, outplacement firm Challenger, Grey, and Christmas said there was a sharp drop in planned layoffs in August.

The rule of thumb for recession is a weekly claims level over 400,000. This has existed continuously in the data for over two years now. Eight months into 2010, the only difference from the beginning of the year is that the four-week moving average is now 20,000 higher at 485,500. At no point during the 'recovery' did weekly claims fall to a level indicating the Great Recession actually ended. Weekly claims however should automatically fall during a protracted recession because big companies can only cut so many jobs until they get to a bare bones staff. This doesn't mean the economy is getting better, it means there is no one left to lay off. The Challenger, Grey and Christmas report on planned layoffs supports this view. Weekly claims will remain high under such circumstances if a lot of companies are going out of business because of ongoing recessionary conditions.

While there is no inconsistency with the weekly claims and the Challenger, Grey and Christmas data, the ADP and ISM employment data directly contradict each other. ADP's numbers are based on payroll processing while ISM's numbers are based on a survey of purchasing managers (the government's employment report is also based on surveys). The ADP report stated there was a significant drop in manufacturing hiring in August and the ISM report claimed there was a significant gain. The ISM report also showed a decline in the new orders component (Why would there be a substantial increase in hiring when there is less work to do?). Perhaps we will get some clarification in the government's August employment report tomorrow. 

There will be no sustainable economic recovery until private sector hiring picks up. This hasn't happened yet. While the mainstream media has reported otherwise, government numbers on private sector hiring include education jobs (almost all of which are government) and health care jobs (many of which are paid for indirectly by government programs). The private sector temporary jobs category in the employment report also has a footnote stating jobs from other categories are included. Could those other categories be government jobs? Looks like it, since once the Census stopped hiring, new temporary employment seems to have dried up. At the moment, it looks like any real recovery in private sector employment is a long way off.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

What the Bear Market in Chinese Stocks is Telling Us

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


China has been the economic engine powering the global recovery, but the engine may be sputtering based on the behavior of Chinese stocks. The Shanghai Composite has been trading in bear market territory since May 6th.

Unlike the U.S., UK and EU, which have service based economies, China's economy is heavily industrial. What takes place in China provides important information about the state of the global manufacturing. Activity in China is a key driver of the markets for industrial metals, materials, and energy. It was just announced in the media that China has become the largest consumer of energy commodities globally; pulling ahead of the United States, but the Chinese government has denied it.

Since the major Western economies and the Chinese economy have different compositions, it is reasonable to assume that their stock markets could trade in different patterns. The bull market peaks came at about the same time however. The Shanghai market hit a bottom around 1000 in mid-2005 and entered a bubble pattern in 2006, which continued until a high of 6036 was reached on October 17, 2007. As the bubble burst, Chinese stocks fell 72% until the market reached 1707 on November 4, 2008.  Unlike U.S. stocks, which continued to fall until they reached their bottom in early March 2009, the Shanghai composite then began to rally. The prices for metals, materials, and the companies that produce them tended to follow the Chinese market and not Western markets - investors should keep this in mind for future reference. Oil didn't bottom until mid-February 2009 though.

Not only did the Shanghai Composite hit its low four months earlier than the U.S. market, its high from the rally that followed took place well before the top in Western stock markets. So far, Chinese stocks topped at 3471 on August 4, 2009. U.S. stocks peaked on April 26, 2010. By the end of August 2009 the Shanghai index was down more than 20% on a closing basis, but only briefly. After some recovery, stocks entered bear market territory again for a few days in the end of September. They then moved up and traded with less than a 20% drop from the August peak for many months until May 6th of this year. Chinese stocks have continued to trade at a bear market loss since that date.

Poor performance of Chinese stocks indicates weakness in the global industrial economy. Most commodities are likely to suffer declines as a result. This has more significance for the U.S. currently than it usually would ordinarily because the industrial sector of the economy has performed best during the recovery. The much bigger service sector has remained fairly anemic despite $3 trillion of federal deficit spending in fiscal years 2009 and 2010. If U.S. manufacturing turns negative, and behavior of Chinese stocks indicates is might, the U.S. economy is likely to follow.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Market Going Down With the Ship?

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


This morning the Baltic Dry Index, a measure of freight rates for international shipping, was at 1700. It hasn't been at this level since April 2009, only four months after its Credit Crisis low and only one month after the stock market was at its bottom. 

Bloomberg News noted a week ago that the index had dropped continuously for the longest period in nine years. Yes, the current drop in the preceding seven weeks (from a high of 4209 in late May) has been bigger than anything seen during the Credit Crisis. The last drop of this magnitude was in August 2001 in the middle of that years recession. Lack of shipping activity from China, the engine for global economic activity, was cited as the main cause for the falling index. Charter rates for all types of ships tracked in the index are falling.

Prices for dry bulk shipping, which doesn't include energy commodities, tend to be very sensitive to economic activity. A sharp drop in rates indicates a significant drop in global trade. Based on historical charts it looks like the Baltic Index can lead, be coincident or lag movements in economic data and the stock market. The index seems to be most closely correlated with prices of industrial commodities and the industrial sector of the global economy. While this is not the largest component of the U.S. economy (the service sector is four times larger), it is the key sector in developing economies. It was manufacturing though that had the biggest rebound in the U.S. since last year. The service sector has remained lackluster.

The stock market will likely be following the Baltic Index down, although perhaps not with such a precipitous decline. The Index has dropped almost 60% since late May. With the exception of the small cap Russell 2000, none of the major stock indices have had even a 20% drop - at least not yet.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

What's Driving Today's Market Rally

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


Major European stock indices were up two to three percent today after Asian indices rose around one percent last night. The U.S. markets then had a strong opening after the three-day holiday weekend. Mainstream media is citing bargain hunting as the source of the rally, whereas money-pumping operations to support the euro is likely the major contributor to the market's bullish behavior.

Stocks were devastated in the last two weeks and some rally at this point is reasonable in order to resolve an oversold condition. Strong buying in the U.S. though would be inconsistent with the bear market signal being giving by the S&P 500 on Friday and the small cap Russell 2000 having experienced a bear market loss of over 20% the same day. This is not the type of market environment that traders can't wait to plunge into on the long side. Liquidity pumping by the major central banks would be most effective (and likely) at a key market juncture like this however.

Central bank efforts to support a faltering global financial system began in earnest on Sunday May 9th after the Flash Crash three days earlier. The EU announced its $915 billion euro rescue plan and at the same time the U.S. Fed opened unlimited liquidity swap facilities with the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Swiss National Bank. A swap facility up to $30 billion was opened with the Bank of Canada. The Fed stated, "These facilities are designed to help improve liquidity conditions" and that the Bank of Japan was considering similar measures. The swap arrangements were authorized until January 2011.

Stock markets around the world then skyrocketed on Monday, May 10th since increased liquidity shows up immediately in stock prices. Investors should expect intermittent market impact both from euro rescue money and swap generated liquidity for the next few months. For the full text of the Fed's announcement, see: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20100509a.htm.

It is fortunate for the markets that liquidity is on tap when needed. Not only is the technical picture of the market deteriorating, but the economic news isn't supporting stocks either. Little noticed last Friday was the announcement of a decline of 1.4% in U.S. industrial production. The ISM Manufacturing index for June, which came in at 56.2, indicated a slowing expansion (over 50 indicates growth). Almost every component, except for those related to inventories, was down. New orders, an indication of future activity, dropped 7.2 from the previous month. The ISM Service index fell to 53.8, which was below forecast. The employment component was 49.7 dropping below 50 and indicating job losses. The service sector is four times bigger than the manufacturing sector in the U.S.

Investors should enjoy the rally while is lasts. The rally after the flash crash in May lasted four days. Within ten days, stocks were lower than they had been during the crash. Liquidity induced rallies can be powerful, but they don't last very long.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Drop in Shipping Indicates Slowing Global Economy

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Baltic Dry Index, a measure of international shipping rates for dry bulk cargoes, hit new lows for the year on Monday June 28th. The index has dropped sharply in the last month and is indicating that global manufacturing activity is experiencing a major slowdown.

Shipping rates are very dependent on market demand (it takes a long time to build a large ship and to increase the supply of shipping capacity) and will rise and fall sharply in response to it. The Baltic Dry Index (BDIY:IND) is a daily record of costs to ship goods such as building materials, coal, metallic ores and grains. Oil and natural gas are not included in the index. Many of the products that are included are used as inputs somewhere in the manufacturing pipeline.

Shipping activity for 2010 peaked so far on May 26th when the Baltic Dry Index reached 4209. Yesterday, a little more than one month later, the index stood at 2447 - a 42% drop. Until this week, the low for the year had been 2501 on January 25th.  Not only is shipping at a new low for 2010, but the high for this year was less than the high reached on November 23, 2009. On that date the index was 4423 and as of now that was the post Credit Crisis peak. This compares to the all-time high of 11,793. It looks like we won't be reaching that level again anytime soon.

Lower highs and lower lows paint a picture of a weakening trend for shipping. The next key level for investors to watch is 2163. This was the low in activity on September 24, 2009. If the index breaks below this, returns to the incredibly lackluster levels in the spring of 2009 are possible. It is not likely though that we will be returning to the all-time low level of 663 from December 5, 2008. At that time, global economic activity was literally frozen and was at a severe depression level. Even in a fairly steep double dip recession, there should be more shipping activity than that.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Don't Confuse Inflation with Economic Growth

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


While U.S. government generated data claims inflation is tame or non-existent, industry reports strongly contradict this view. The ISM reports on the state of U.S. Manufacturing and Services in March are indicating a great deal of inflation. Higher prices make the ISM data look better, as is also the case for the retail sales numbers issued by the government, but they are not the same as economic growth. Mainstream media reporting generally ignores this important difference.

The CPI figures for February, the latest available, had consumer inflation as zero month over month and up only 2.1% from the previous year. The low numbers reported in the statistics are used to maintain the Federal Reserves claims that inflation isn't a problem (cynics claim that it is the other way around). But industry can't be so cavalier about its statistics because if it has to rely on them to make business decisions. Industry group ISM - Institute of Supply Management - reports have been indicating inflation for nine months now.  Frequently the strongest component of the reports has been 'Prices Paid'. In the March report, 'Prices Paid' was at 75.0 and was up 8.0 from February.  No other item was growing as fast as prices. In the ISM reports, 50.0 is the dividing point between expansion and contraction. A number like 75.0 indicates very strong expansion. Anecdotal comments in the report corroborated this view, with one of the respondents stating, "We are also seeing dramatic price increases."

The ISM Non-Manufacturing, more commonly known as Services, report for March also had 'Prices Paid' as the fastest growing component. The number was a strong, but not out of control, 62.9. While inflation was pumping up the overall number in the Services report, the Inventories, Supplier Deliveries and Employment components were bringing it down because they were still contracting. Service employment has now contracted for 27 months in a row according to the ISM. The government's Non-Farms Payroll report last Friday indicated that the service component of the private sector added approximately 82,000 jobs. Apparently the ISM can't find any of them.

While the mainstream media has continually been reporting that the U.S. economy is recovering, investors shouldn't consider this to be of particular significance. Reports of an improving economy always take place after severe downturns. They may or may not be accurate. If you went back and looked at U.S. news coverage during the 1930s recession, you would be able to find a number of stories about how the economy was getting better and showing evidence of recovery. These reports went on for many years. After more than a decade of misplaced optimism, the U.S. economy finally did recover thanks to World War II.

Disclosure: Long oil

NEXT: Inflation Denial Won't Keep Prices Low

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

ISM Reports for December Confirm Inflation

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The January 6th report from the ISM (Institute of Supply Management) on the state of the U.S. service economy in December indicated neither growth, nor decline. The tepid 50.1 reading was in contrast to the 55.9 number for December manufacturing that was released two days earlier. It would have been much better news for the economy if the numbers had been reversed since the service sector of the U.S. economy is four times bigger than the manufacturing sector. Neither report is adjusted for inflation. Both have a 'Prices' component that figure in the overall numbers, so inflation can make the top line number look better. The Prices component was indeed one of the highest numbers in both reports.

The dividing line for contraction versus expansion for the ISM is 50. Numbers in the 60's are very strong. The Prices component in the Manufacturing report for December came in at 61.5, up 6.5 over November. It was the third highest number. Prices in the Non-Manufacturing (services) report were up 0.9 to 58.7. This was the second highest component, exceeded only by Inventory Sentiment. December was by no means the first time the inflation numbers were high. Inflation was already evident in the reports for August 2009. In that month, the Prices component was 65.0 and 63.1 for Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing respectively. The Non-Manufacturing number was up a whopping 21.8 from July. Prices in the Manufacturing report were up 10.0, having already been above the 50 level the month before. Gold began a major rally on this news that first took it to $1000 and then well beyond that level.

The revival in manufacturing is not just taking place in the U.S. but is occurring globally. Reports out of the UK indicate manufacturing activity there is at a 25-month high. Manufacturing in the Eurozone is at a 21-month high. China recently announced that its manufacturing sector expanded at the fastest rate in 20 months. Government stimulus programs and close to zero interest rates are having their impact and it is showing up in production statistics. This is better news for manufacturing-based economies, than it is for service-based economies like the United States. Expansionary fiscal and monetary policies are good for economic growth in the short term. This growth is not necessarily sustainable however and there is eventually a price that has to be paid with inflation.

Where is the inflation coming from? While it is likely to show up in price increases across the board in the long run, in the short run it is appearing in raw materials. The December ISM Non-Manufacturing report had an important statement confirming this. Toward the bottom of the report,  the following statement can be found: "No commodities were reported down in price". Government stimulus seems to be doing a good job of stimulating prices. 

Disclosure: Long gold.

NEXT:

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Employment Figures Don't Add Up

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Fed chair Ben Bernanke is up for reappointment and is experiencing some difficult times with his congressional critics. Good news has suddenly and conveniently appeared to bolster his case however, including Bank of America planning on repaying the TARP money it received from the U.S. government and then a big improvement on the non-farms payroll number released on December 3rd. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were only 11,000 jobs lost in November 2009 and the losses for the previous couple of months weren't nearly as bad as they had reported (the last time there were actual job gains in the U.S. was in December 2007). Independent private surveys don't corroborate the government's numbers.

The U.S. government figures were not completely rosy by any means. They indicate that there were major job losses in Manufacturing and Construction, a significant drop in Information and in Leisure and Hospitality jobs, and amazingly a drop in Retail jobs during the height of the holiday season. U.S. Manufacturing employment fell by 41,000 in November and has declined by an eye-popping 2.1 million since the recession began in December 2007. Construction jobs fell by 27,000. There was also a loss of 17,000 jobs in the Information industries (half of that in telecommunications). Leisure and Hospitality lost 11,000 jobs. Jobs in retail declined by 15,000. You would not know this from reading the BLS press release however, unless you looked at the data attached to the bottom of it. The copy did not mention that there was a job loss in retail, but instead stated "there was little change in wholesale and retail employment".

So where did the job gains come from? Three categories had increases in employment -Professional and Business Services, Education and Health Services and Government. Professional and Business Services was the big gainer adding 86,000 jobs. However, 52,000 of those jobs were part-time. Education and Health Services added 40,000 jobs with 21,000 of these jobs coming from Health Care and presumably 19,000 from Education (which is not known for hiring people in November). Government added 7,000 jobs. The two consistent job producers since the recession began two years ago have been the Government and Health Care categories, with Education also frequently adding jobs (many health care and education jobs are government related).

The BLS claimed that unemployment fell from 10.2% to 10.0% in November. How can the unemployment rate fall when there are job losses? People have to leave the labor force. Barring a sudden population decrease of working age individuals, workers have to get so discouraged form the bad employment situation that they just give up looking. According to the BLS, 2.3 million people are marginally attached to the labor force and are not counted as unemployed because they did not look for a job in the previous four weeks. Another 9.2 million are working part-time even though they want full-time employment. The alternative unemployment rate which includes discouraged workers and involuntary part-time workers was reported by the BLS as 17.2%.

A check on U.S. government employment figures can be gotten from the ISM (Institute of Supply Management) Services and Manufacturing Indices, both of which survey employment as well as a number of other factors which indicate economic growth or lack thereof. The Services Index was released just yesterday and employment came in at 41.6 (under 50 means contraction). Employment in the services sector has been in decline for the last 19 months and dropped from October to November according to the ISM. All the job gains in the government employment report supposedly came from the service sector. There is a major contradiction here.

The November non-farms payroll figures are another government release indicating the U.S. economy is getting better. This one doesn't add up either. Healthy economies don't have major job losses in manufacturing and construction. Nor are jobs lost in retail during the holiday season (they are during depressions, but certainly not if the economy is improving). The big job gains were part-time, not permanent. The unemployment rate is improving because workers are so discouraged that they are leaving the labor force, not because jobs are being added. This doesn't happen if the economy is getting better either. Furthermore private surveys don't support the governments numbers. Investors should be wary. While markets can be fooled in the short-term, in the long-term they trade on reality.

Disclosure: None.

NEXT: Gold in Technical Correction as Dollar Rallies

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Markets Roller Coaster Ride Powered by Media Hype

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Yesterday, stocks in the U.S. went on an a roller coaster ride that saw a steady significant move up, followed by an almost vertical descent (which included a 30 point drop in the Dow in just one minute), then a gradual climb back up into a positive close. The European Central Bank seems to have continued interfering in the currency markets (in one way or the other) by supporting the euro behind the scenes and this is what caused the intraday drop in the stocks. One asset though managed to stay in positive territory and gain technical strength yesterday - gold. More hairpin turns and sharp up and down moves should be expected for awhile. The mainstream media seems intent on publishing stories that will keep the volatility going.

Spot gold closed at $1060.60 (up $14.60) at the 5:15PM end of Globex trading yesterday. It broke through the $1050 resistance level and stayed above it all day. Gold traded as high as $1064.00. It then got as high as $1066 overnight on news that the IMF sold 200 metric tons of its gold to India (the price of course dropped the moment New York trading opened). The IMF board voted to sell 403.3 metric tons of its 3,217 tonne gold holdings on Sept 18th after telling the market multiple times over two years (each time driving the price of gold down) that it was going to do this. It was widely believed China would buy the entire amount of the IMF gold for sale using this as an opportunity to get rid of some of its massive dollar reserves. China stupidly didn't do this however. It might buy the remaining 200 tonnes of IMF gold or any number of Gulf oil states could. In general, gold is leaving the central banks for Europe and moving to the central banks of Asia.

Gold went up yesterday in U.S. trading because of inflation concerns. The ISM Manufacturing report for October came in at 55.7, up from 52.6 in September (above 50 indicates expansion). The strongest of the 10 components of the report? - Prices Paid, which is an inflation indicator. This number came in at 65.0, up from 63. 5. It was the highest number in the September report as well. While inflation was the biggest news in this report, I saw no mainstream media article that even mentioned it, let alone headlined it. Instead stories like "Dollar Falls After Strong Factory Data" appeared and claimed the dollar was going down because of heightened risk appetite, the current fantasy the media has spun to take investor's attention away from inflation. This article did hint at inflation though in the 18th paragraph (most people don't read to the end of articles), when it mentioned that a flood of liquidity from central banks might have something to do with the way the market is reacting.

Media coverage reached even lower levels this morning. The glaring headline, "U.S. Stock Futures Drop Sharply", could be found many places online. When I clicked on a major financial website's version, an article with a different headline appeared, " U.S. Stock Futures Off Lows ....". People who didn't click wouldn't know the news had changed though. Traders frequently only see headlines. What was the 'sharp drop' in futures? The Dow was down 61 points, the S&P 500 down 7 points and Nasdaq down 7 points - completely ordinary meaningless moves.

There is risk for stocks today because the euro had a sharp drop overnight after the Australian central bank raised rates by a quarter of a point to 3.5%. Australia was the first central bank to start raising rates last month, which is one reason the Australian dollar is so strong. This move should be more threatening to the U.S. dollar than the euro however, but the trade-weighted dollar is rallying on the euro sell off. Ironically, this could damage U.S. stocks the most because if you check you will see their best correlation has been to movements in the euro since last March (the euro represents over 50% of the trade-weighted dollar). Gold seems to have been hardly impacted by the currency move at all. Traditionally gold and the euro should be moving together and the stock currency relationship should be more tangential.

As if the first two days of the week aren't exciting enough, the end of the week will see the U.S. monthly employment report. I would also like to remind everyone that this is the beginning of the month and the first four days of trading should be positive. At the moment it's hard to say if the bears or bulls will win out. It is easier to predict a lot of volatility, which is a classic sign of a top.

NEXT: Gold Rockets Higher

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21


This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Unemployment Rises as Car Sales Collapse

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The U.S. jobs report this morning didn't indicate an economic recovery, it looked more like an economy mired in severe recession - and this is after more than $4 trillion dollars spent on bailouts and stimulus so far. The latest government stimulus program that was supposed to be saving the economy (as were all the others), Cash for Clunkers, seems to have had no residual effect on the auto industry. Data out yesterday indicate that sales fell right back to the worse levels of the recession the moment the program ended. The ISM Manufacturing report yesterday showed a drop in U.S. manufacturing activity from August to September. There is still some glow from the Clunkers program however and a bigger drop will likely be seen next month. If this is economic recovery, who needs a deep recession?

The jobs report can only be described as ugly all around. While the headline unemployment rate rose to 9.8%, the alternative measure which includes discouraged workers and forced part-timers reached 17.0% (that's the U.S. government's official number). Hours worked dropped to an all time low. The number or workers unemployed for over 6 months is also at a record. The number of job losses for July and August were revised upward by 13,000. The government further stated it might raise the total number of unemployed in its year end revision. The number of job losses this month was 263,000. Economists, almost all of whom think the recession is over, had expected only 180,000. Nothing, and I mean nothing, in the employment numbers indicates a recovering economy.

Auto sales in August and September illustrate quite clearly the impotence of government stimulus in reviving an economy with major structural weakness (Japan in the 1990s and 2000s had one stimulus program after another and is still recessionary). U.S. auto sales reached about the 14 million annual rate in August. The Clunker program ended on August 31st. September auto sales now look like they will be a bit over 9 million at an annual rate. This is as low as the lowest sales figures recorded last February and April. So once the stimulus was removed auto sales slipped right back to the bottom. Economic 'recovery' that only takes place if there is government stimulus is no recovery whatsoever.

The ISM manufacturing index was still above 50 (the point that divides expansion and contraction) this month, even though it fell from August. The index declined 18 months in a row before last month. Cash for Clunkers juiced up the numbers considerably in August. They could easily fall back into negative territory in October. Production, new orders, exports, and employment were all down in September. The item in the report that is expanding most rapidly? It's prices paid, which is a measure of inflation.

While continued massive government stimulus will not revive a structurally damaged economy, it can be very effective in creating out of control inflation. The more the economy doesn't budge, the more stimulus the government implements. In the current state of affairs in the U.S. that also means more money printing (the Japanese did not have to resort to this). Gold closed at $1004.30 today in New York - above its key breakout level of $1003.50. Some years from now, we will probably look back and wonder how gold could ever have been so cheap.

NEXT: Recovery? Don't Bank on It

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

So Much for That Recovery

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

The G20 meeting ends today and precious metals should be under pressure and the dollar should continue to rally. Traders are worried that some rumblings about supporting the U.S. dollar may come out of the meeting, although the Japanese Finance minister recently said he was uninterested in intervening to drive the Yen down. While something could be said, the likelihood that anything would be done in the near-term is less than nil. Currency intervention is expensive and the printing presses of the major central banks are already booked full-time to support government economic stimulus programs.

The much ballyhooed impending U.S. economic recovery seems to be crumbling. While this only means more government stimulus and money printing, gold and silver are selling off instead of skyrocketing on the news (no that doesn't make any sense). The U.S. Durable Goods report came out this morning and it was down 2.4% in August. A drop of 48% in highly volatile aircraft orders was mostly responsible for the decline , as was the 98% increase in aircraft orders last month that lead to the rise in July. Autos were still up 0.4% last month with the impact of the Cash for Clunkers program waning. Core capital goods, which are the key to what is really going on in the economy, were down 0.4% in August. They dropped by 1.3% in July. So far, there doesn't seem to be any solid evidence of a sustainable recovery in manufacturing.

The bad durable goods numbers followed a 2.7% drop in existing home sales in August that was announced yesterday. That report indicated that 31% of U.S. house sales were 'distressed' (foreclosures for example) and that sales were concentrated in the low end of the market. Well that sounds like a description of a healthy housing market doesn't it? As if the banking system didn't have enough trouble from residential real estate, worse news today came from a report on large bank loans (these are loans over $20 million). Of these, 22.3% are 'troubled'. That is up from 13.4% last year. As a reminder, the U.S. banking system is supposed to have been 'stabilized' according to the Federal Reserve.

While things may look bad in the U.S., they seem to be worse in Japan. Japan is an export based economy and exports there fell 36% in August. Car shipments were down 50% and steel down 43%. GDP was positive last quarter and Japan supposedly exited its most recent recession (one of many in the last two decades)...well, maybe not. The stock of Japan's largest brokerage house, Nomura, plunged 16% last night on the news that it was issuing more stock. This is the second new stock issue in 6 months. Japan has been 'stabilizing' it financial sector for 19 years now. The U.S. looks like it is heading toward long-term 'stabilization' as well.

NEXT: Precious Metals Watch

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Non-Farm Payrolls and Its 'Statistical Quirks'

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

When deciding how credible this mornings jobs reports is, you only have to look at one number. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in the auto industry went UP by 28,000 last month. Nobody believes this, and I mean nobody, not even the biggest government boot licking financial reporters. Even the mainstream media cautioned that this could be a 'statistical quirk', the polite term in the numbers industry for lying. You should assume that finding one 'statistical quirk' in a report is similar to finding one roach in your apartment. In both cases, there's a lot more that you're not seeing.

The headline number for the report was a loss of 247,000 jobs, which is bad enough as is. July was the 19th consecutive month for job losses. Since the recession has began in December 2007, the government admits that 6.7 million jobs have been lost. Goods-producing industries shed 128,000 jobs, and service-producing industries cut 119,000 jobs, including 44,000 in retail and 38,000 in professional and business services. Unemployment in retail (the largest individual private sector employer) seems to be accelerating. After the 'robust' auto industry gains, health care was the biggest job gainer. Government also added about 7 thousand jobs, but this information was left out of the BLS press release even though it is always reported (when information that has always been available suddenly disappears watch out).

According to the government, the unemployment rate declined to 9.4% (actually 16.3% if you include discouraged workers and involuntary temp workers). You may ask how is it possible for there to be a significant job loss and for unemployment to improve at the same time (could it be another 'statistical quirk')? It's simple - 422,000 people 'conveniently' left the labor force. Even though the O'bama, Bernanke, and Geithner and the BLS in its press release tell us that the economy is improving, large numbers of people are giving up looking for jobs because they think there is no chance of finding one. Somehow, I don't think both of these contradictory views are possible. One of them seems to be a lie - pardon me, I meant 'statistical quirk'.

If you listen carefully to what Obama and Bernanke have been saying for the last several months, you will notice that 'things are getting less worse' is the gist of their statements. The Obama litany is: the financial meltdown has ended (which happened during the Bush administration, but he still takes credit for it), the rate of job loss is slowing, and the stock market is doing better. Bernanke also concentrates on the stock market is getting better theme (and I am sure this is not taking place without some government assistance). The recession is indeed getting 'less worse', although not as much as the government claims. There is also a huge gaping chasm between getting less worse and getting better. However, the government may be able to solve this problem in the future with bigger 'statistical quirks'.

NEXT: The Smoking Gun of the Economic Recovery Scam

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Oil storage, Stocks and States

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

U.S. Stocks opened strongly this morning. How they close and on what volume will be significant. The economic news, although negative is being reported in a positive light this morning. The fiscal crisis in California, and a number of other states, is being mostly ignored. It's likely everyone is assuming they will find some way to carry on. The oil storage report this week was a repeat of last weeks.

Yesterday, the Dow once again closed below its 200-day moving average. Intraday, it fell below the 50-day, but managed to rise to close above it. So far today, it is well above it for only the second time in the last two weeks. China hit a new yearly high last night and European stocks were up nicely today, especially commodity plays linked to Chinese growth prospects. Japan, Australia and New Zealand were down, although the rest of Asia was up. Gold has traded up nicely and silver decently today. The trade-weighted dollar is weak, last trading at 79.69, still just above its break down level of 78.33.

Oil peaked today in mid-day European trading, where it reached at least 71.50. Selling came in strongly after the storage report. Crude supplies were down another 3.7 million barrels last week. In the last two months they have dropped sharply. Gasoline and distillates were both up however, gasoline by 2.3 million barrels and distillates by 2.9 million barrels. Even if oil in storage is in short supply, it won't matter for awhile because there is more than enough gasoline, diesel and heating oil around at the moment. The last quote I saw for oil was 69.35.

In economic news, the ISM Manufacturing report came in at 44.8, better than last months 42.8. Any number below 50 indicates that manufacturing activity is contracting. Nevertheless the mainstream media reported big improvements in manufacturing data. This was the 17th month in a row that the manufacturing sector of the U.S. economy has shrunk. Housing data today was contradictory. The government reported that its home purchase index was down 21.9% year over year based on mortgage applications. The less reliable real estate PR organization NAR reported that pending home sales were up however based on signed contracts. Guess which news item got the most attention from the media.

NEXT: So far, so Bad

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer,New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Synchronized Contractions Give Birth to Global Recession

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. In addition to the term helicopter economics, we have also coined the term, helicopternomics, to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and to update the old-fashioned term wheelbarrow economics.

Our Video Related to this Blog:

Recently released manufacturing numbers in the U.S., Europe, and Asia are off the charts. Unfortunately the part of the charts they are off is the downside. While the media was trumpeting the biggest global expansion ever last year, the New York Investing meetup pointed out that every economic expansion in history has been followed by a contraction and therefore the biggest expansion ever was likely to be followed by the biggest contraction. The most recent figures for manufacturing activity show that this is exactly what is taking place.

In the U.S., the ISM fell to 36.2 (anything under 50 indicates contraction), the lowest since the recession of 1982. The Prices Paid component fell to 25.5, the lowest since 1949. Falling commodity prices were blamed for the sharp drop. The Order Backlog component was the lowest ever. Manufacturing in Europe isn't in any better shape. In Britain, the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply index fell to 34.4. The VTB Bank Europe Index for the Eurozone including Russia fell to 39.8. In Asia, two purchasing manager surveys in China fell to 38.8 and 40.9 respectively. The Yuan fell limit down on the news. As further corroboration of a global contraction, the most recently released semiconductor sale figures indicated a drop of 2.4% in sales year over year.

The markets didn't react kindly to this plethora of bad economic reports. As of this writing, NYMEX oil has dropped as low as $50.76. The markets in Europe had crash level drops on the day, with the exception of the FTSE in Britain, which missed the cut off by a hair. In the U.S., the Nasdaq and S&P 50 are trading at crash levels so far. This is taking place after the biggest up week for the U.S. indices since the mega-bear market in 1974. Last week the S&P 500 rose 12%, the Nasdaq 11%, and the Dow 9%. Too much, too fast is never sustainable in stock market action and today's trading is showing that once again the validity of this rule.

Retail reports for Black Friday aren't much to cheer about either. While sales supposedly went up 7.2% from last year, surveys indicate that 70% of shoppers purchased only deeply discounted items. So sales might hold up, but retail profits are likely to plummet. The desperation for bargains was so acute that a Walmart worker on Long Island was trampled to death. In bad economic times, the public's actions can indeed become quite ugly.

NEXT: NBER Admits that New York Investing Was Right

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.