March Consumer Confidence and the Housing Market

 

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.

The Conference Board's March Consumer Confidence number came in at 70.2 this morning. As has been the case for the last four years, hope for a better tomorrow is holding the number up. It certainly wasn't the real estate market, which has been shown to be weak once again.

A healthy consumer confidence number is 90 or above. This number has not been this high at any point since the "recovery" began in mid-2009. It has instead ranged between a deep recession level in the 40's and a milder recession level in the 70s. What has caused repeated rises and falls in the number are changes in the Expectations sub-component. How people view current conditions has remained dismally low.

This is how it works. Consumers are bombarded with stories from the news media about how the economy is heading up and then they are asked if they think the economy will be better in six months. Not surprisingly, many answer yes and this causes overall consumer confidence to rise. As the months go on and they don't see any real improvement they become more pessimistic and they don't  think things will be better in six months and then the number falls. This scenario has played out multiple times in the last three years.

Expectations for a better future zoomed to 88.4 in February, but fell back somewhat to 83.0 in March.
The Present Situation Index, however, was a very poor 46.4 in February, but rose to 51.0 in March. While these numbers are not good, they are much better than some Present Situation numbers during the "recovery" year of 2011. Those were at depression levels. The worst number last year however wasn't the Present Situation one, but the Jobs Are Plentiful reading. This was statistically indistinguishable from zero at one point. Since negative numbers are not possible in the report, the reading has not gotten worse.

There have been two running news stories since the beginning of 2012 that have buoyed the consumer confidence numbers — an improving employment situation and a recovering housing market. Both of these may prove to be illusory. The hype about the real estate recovery is already starting to unravel. 

U.S. home prices dropped for the fifth month in a row in January according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index. They are now down 34.4% from their highs in July 2006. The National Association of Realtors has reported that existing home sales slipped 0.9 percent in February to an annual rate of 4.59 million units. As for pending contracts, a whopping 33% were canceled last month. While many have pointed out that home sales were much better in February 2012 than they were in February 2011, they usually neglect to mention that most of the U.S. was snowed in last February and this February was one of the warmest on record. The real recovery seems to have been one in the weather.

The sharp differences in weather from year to year can impact any economic statistic that is seasonally adjusted. The employment numbers are in this category. They may have been juiced up by a warmer winter as well. If so, U.S. consumers will start to become less hopeful about the future as they have before and the confidence numbers will start drifting down later this year.

Disclosure: None

Daryl Montgomery
Author: "Inflation Investing - A Guide for the 2010s"
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. There is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Industrial Production: July Up , But June Is Now Negative

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


The Fed reported that industrial production was up 1.0% in July and this got all the media headline attention. Stocks rallied on the bullish news implying economic recovery. Buried in the coverage was that June's number, originally reported as an increase, was downwardly revised to minus 0.1%.

The government's handling and media reporting of the industrial production numbers are similar to many other economic reports. Good news is reported in the initial release. Mainstream media gives the good news big headlines and coverage that is so glowing that it is amazing there aren't cheerleaders in the background waving brightly colored pompoms and shouting 'Go US economy, Go US economy, Rah, Rah, Rah' while jumping up and down (By the way, I am expecting CNBC to steal this idea. I can see the top executives hitting themselves in the head right now and saying, "Why didn't we think of that?"). The downward revisions, and sometimes there are several, that come later on and indicate things aren't so good or there is even a decline taking place get minimal and sometimes no media attention. There's no need for a propaganda ministry when the government has a deal like this with the mainstream media.

Both the June and July industrial production reports have the additional problem of unusual situations that made the numbers better. The very hot weather in June spiked the utility component. In July, auto plants didn't shut down for their usual annual retooling. Because of this, the automotive products component of industrial production increased 8.8%. Most of that in turn was "due to large increase in light truck assemblies". Looking elsewhere in the report it can be seen that 'Output of Business Equipment' was up 1.8%. This increase was driven by the transit equipment sub-component that was up 6.3%, an "increase that in large part represented the gain in light truck assemblies" according to the report. So without the big increase in light truck assemblies (which impacted a number of components), industrial production wasn't strong in July.

The report did claim that most components of industrial production were up however. The exceptions were food, beverages, clothing, appliances  ....  you know, things that are necessities. Well, what is a better indicator of the state of the U.S. economy, a 1.1% increase in the defense component due to bigger production of military aircraft or the American consumer being able to buy food and clothing? This is apparently an example of the 'uneven recovery' that economists speak about. It doesn't prevent optimists from seeing the light at the end of the tunnel for the weak economy based on July industrial production numbers. Pessimists are seeing the light (truck assemblies) at the end of the tunnel instead.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

Wall Street Journal’s Flawed Reasoning For Possible Crash

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.



The Wall Street Journal published an article entitled, “Is a Crash Coming? 10 Reason to Be Cautious” on Friday, August 13th. While a crash is certainly possible, the reasons given by the Journal have little to do with why one could occur.

The Journal did make it clear that it was not predicting a crash. The article’s author specifically stated, “I don’t make predictions. That’s a sucker’s game.” Indeed it is a sucker’s game for almost all mainstream financial journalists, just as professional basketball is for midgets – it’s just not an area of natural talent. That of course doesn’t mean that no one can do it, but the author nevertheless made this illogical leap and this nicely set the tone for the rest of his article.

Most of the reasons given in the article for a possible crash were actually arguments for a double-dip recession. These include (my comment follow in italics):

The Fed is getting nervous (more like catatonic).

Deflation is already here (if so, it will be the first time in history money printing created deflation).

People still owe way too much money.

The job picture is much worse than they’re telling you (one of the ‘they’ referred to is the Wall Street Journal itself by the way).

Housing remains a disaster.

We’re looking at gridlock in Washington (so don’t expect any more big spending programs that accomplish little and raise your taxes)

All sorts of other [economic] indicators are flashing amber (actually bright red).

This is an implied assumption in the article that market crashes are related to recessions, also an illogical leap not supported by the facts. The worse U.S. market crash of all-time took place in October 1987, five years after a recession had ended and almost three years before another one began. There were also mini-crashes in 1989 and 1997. The economy was not in recession during these crashes either, nor was it during the recent flash crash.

Economic downturns are more properly associated with bear markets – a long, slow decline in stock prices as opposed to the sudden, sharp drops that take place during crashes. They require very different trading approaches. Even bear markets can take place outside a recession however. The 1998 bear market due to the Russian debt default and the implosion of Long-Term Capital is a good example. Both crashes and bear markets can be caused by global liquidity events and as we saw recently during the Credit Crisis, global liquidity events can also lead to recessions. This did not happen in the U.S. in the 1980s and 1990s however.

Perhaps the Wall Street Journal should have entitled its article, “10 Reasons Why We Are Headed Into a Recession”. They would have to find three additional reasons of course and they would also have to be a bit shameless as well since I already wrote that article on July 8th and it was published on a number of blog sites that day. Well, at least the Wall Street Journal is making some efforts to try to keep up with the blogosphere, even though those efforts are confused and coming weeks later. Now, what can we predict from that?


Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

The Curious Case of Copper and Its Compatriots

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


While traders are scratching their heads about how the stock market can continue to go up while the economic news continues to get worse, they also should be puzzled over the sharp rise in copper and other industrial metals in recent weeks. These metals move with building and manufacturing activity and a rise in their prices is not just an indication of an improving economy, but is also an indication of inflation - not the deflation that the Fed and its friends have been worrying about lately.

The base metals, copper, aluminum, nickel, zinc and lead, all bottomed in early June. They mounted lackluster rallies into the middle of July. Their rallies went into overdrive after Fed Chair Bernanke testified before congress that it might be years before the U.S. economy fully recovers. Stocks also mounted a significant rally on this gloomy news, which followed a host of economic reports with falling numbers that came in below expectations. Leading indicators had also turned down and were pointing toward an impending recession. Stocks and industrial metals should have tanked, but instead rallied strongly on the news. Only a lot of liquidity flowing into the financial system at that point could make something like this happen.

When trying to analyze the metals markets, the first place to look is China, the primary driver of demand. In June, China imported 212,000 metric tons (tonnes) of copper, 67,000 tonnes less than in May and a drop of 44% year over year. Moreover, projections came out for Chinese demand growth to ease for the industrial metals in the second half of the year. Then the HSBC Purchasing Managers Index for July came in below 50, indicating a decline in Chinese manufacturing. So far, none of this news has stopped the rally.

So if the news from China is bearish, the next place to look is the U.S. dollar. All commodities are priced in dollars and are affected by swings in the currency. The U.S. dollar peaked in early June at the same time that the industrial commodities bottomed. It has since lost about 10% of its value. However, much of this loss took place before Bernanke's congressional testimony and much of the base metal rally took place after. The metals rally has also been too big to be accounted for by the drop in the dollar alone. From the June low to the high of August 4th, Copper (JJC) rose 25%, Nickel (JJN) 24%, Aluminum (JJU) 23% and Lead (LD) 46%.

So we are left with a picture of strongly rallying stocks, even more strongly rallying industrial metals and lots of evidence of an economy falling apart. Has this situation ever existed before?  Indeed it has plenty of times in world financial history. This is what happens when there's massive inflation. It ruins the economy, but makes the prices of assets go up because people want to get rid of their currency. Yet the economic elites are currently worried about deflation and not inflation. Well, that's also happened before as well. In 1920s Weimar Germany, economists even managed to prove definitively that deflation existed and that inflation was not a worry, so it was OK for the government to print all the money it wanted to. Of course, after inflation reached a trillion percent, many people became skeptical.

Disclosure: No Positions

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

What the Bear Market in Chinese Stocks is Telling Us

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


China has been the economic engine powering the global recovery, but the engine may be sputtering based on the behavior of Chinese stocks. The Shanghai Composite has been trading in bear market territory since May 6th.

Unlike the U.S., UK and EU, which have service based economies, China's economy is heavily industrial. What takes place in China provides important information about the state of the global manufacturing. Activity in China is a key driver of the markets for industrial metals, materials, and energy. It was just announced in the media that China has become the largest consumer of energy commodities globally; pulling ahead of the United States, but the Chinese government has denied it.

Since the major Western economies and the Chinese economy have different compositions, it is reasonable to assume that their stock markets could trade in different patterns. The bull market peaks came at about the same time however. The Shanghai market hit a bottom around 1000 in mid-2005 and entered a bubble pattern in 2006, which continued until a high of 6036 was reached on October 17, 2007. As the bubble burst, Chinese stocks fell 72% until the market reached 1707 on November 4, 2008.  Unlike U.S. stocks, which continued to fall until they reached their bottom in early March 2009, the Shanghai composite then began to rally. The prices for metals, materials, and the companies that produce them tended to follow the Chinese market and not Western markets - investors should keep this in mind for future reference. Oil didn't bottom until mid-February 2009 though.

Not only did the Shanghai Composite hit its low four months earlier than the U.S. market, its high from the rally that followed took place well before the top in Western stock markets. So far, Chinese stocks topped at 3471 on August 4, 2009. U.S. stocks peaked on April 26, 2010. By the end of August 2009 the Shanghai index was down more than 20% on a closing basis, but only briefly. After some recovery, stocks entered bear market territory again for a few days in the end of September. They then moved up and traded with less than a 20% drop from the August peak for many months until May 6th of this year. Chinese stocks have continued to trade at a bear market loss since that date.

Poor performance of Chinese stocks indicates weakness in the global industrial economy. Most commodities are likely to suffer declines as a result. This has more significance for the U.S. currently than it usually would ordinarily because the industrial sector of the economy has performed best during the recovery. The much bigger service sector has remained fairly anemic despite $3 trillion of federal deficit spending in fiscal years 2009 and 2010. If U.S. manufacturing turns negative, and behavior of Chinese stocks indicates is might, the U.S. economy is likely to follow.

Disclosure: No positions.

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.

U.S. Economy Continues to Deteriorate Despite 'Recovery'

The 'Helicopter Economics Investing Guide' is meant to help educate people on how to make profitable investing choices in the current economic environment. We have coined this term to describe the current monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, which involve unprecedented money printing. This is the official blog of the New York Investing meetup.


A number of economic reports in the last few days indicate that the U.S. economy has not only not failed to recover from the recession, but continues to fall deeper into a hole. Banking, consumer confidence, employment numbers, durable goods and the housing industry - each representing a different aspect of the economy - are all sending out troubling signs. Despite the onslaught of negative data, mainstream economists continue to echo the official U.S. government view that "the recovery is still on track".

Updated statistics from the FDIC indicate that there were 702 banks on the troubled list as the end of 2009. This is an increase of 27% from the third quarter. FDIC numbers also show that U.S. banks cut lending by 7.5% in the fourth quarter of last year. Since lending is the lifeblood of the economy this doesn't bode well for the future. The FDIC also had to put aside an additional $17.8 billion for future bank failures. Its deposit insurance fund is now at a negative $20.9 billion. Despite statements that it has enough cash to keep operating (Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers made similar claims), it is only a matter of time before the FDIC is bailed out. This will take place before the end of the year and will be done by tapping a line of credit from the Treasury department. Expect this event to be downplayed by mainstream media reports with claims that it is not really a bailout.

While the U.S. banking system continues to dissolve, consumers are losing confidence in the economy. The Conference Board numbers for February fell a whopping 10.5 points to 46 (around 100 is a good number). The present situation subindex fell to 19.4, the lowest level since February 1983 when the U.S. was trying to recover from a severe double dip recession. Before the Credit Crisis, consumer spending represented 72% of the U.S. economy. Without their participation, a sustainable recovery is not possible. Other reports indicate there is no way in the near future that consumers can resume their vital economic role. Consumers not only don't have credit, credit card debt was dropping at close to a 20% annual rate at the end of last year, but they are worried about the job market as well.

The weekly jobless claims indicate why the job picture is still troubling. Initial claims were up 22,000 last week to 496,000 (a number around 400,000 indicates recession and 300,000 indicates a healthy economy).  These numbers are highly volatile because they come from state unemployment offices that are notorious for backlogs in processing the claims. This problem occurred during the holiday season and the claim numbers were consequently lower. The mainstream media then fell all over itself to report the tremendous improvement in the employment picture, instead of the real story of bureaucratic incompetence that was preventing accurate numbers from being produced.  Market watchers usually only pay attention to the four-week moving average to get around this problem. This number has risen by 30,000 to 473,750 in the last four-weeks.

The just released Durable Goods report got major headlines about how bullish the number was. This is only the case as long as you don't look at the details of the report. Responsible for the good headline number was a 126% increase in civilian aircraft orders (these orders can be cancelled by the way). Outside of transportation, orders fell 0.6%. Core capital equipment and machinery orders dropped 2.9% and 9.7% respectively. These two numbers are the important ones that determine the direction of the economy. For all of 2009, durable goods fell a record 20%.

Finally, housing doesn't look like it is in recovery mode either. Housing was the epicenter of the Credit Crisis and it will be years before all the damage wrought by the bubble will be worked out. According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgage applications for home purchases have just fallen to a 13-year low. New home sales in the U.S. fell to the lowest level on record in January (records go back almost 50 years). Government nationalized Freddie Mac reported it lost another $7.8 billion in the fourth quarter. That brings its total loss to $25.7 billion for all of 2009. Freddie Mac purchased or guaranteed one in four U.S. home loans in 2009. The Obama administration has promised a blank check to Freddie along with its companion housing entity Fannie Mae, also nationalized and bleeding money, to cover losses up until 2012.

This is little evidence that the U.S. economy has recovered from the recession or is going to recover from the recession any time soon. The support for the recovery viewpoint comes from government statistics that have been highly manipulated. All governments of course want to present a rosy picture of their handling of the economy for political reasons and it is much easier to make the numbers better than it is to actually make the economy better. Eventually the public catches on to this game however. The recent consumer confidence numbers indicate that the American public is no longer buying the public relations story, but is starting to pay more attention to the realities they have to face on a day to day basis.

Disclosure: No positions

NEXT: The Impossible Contradictions of U.S. Consumer Spending

Daryl Montgomery
Organizer, New York Investing meetup
http://investing.meetup.com/21

This posting is editorial opinion. Like all other postings for this blog, there is no intention to endorse the purchase or sale of any security.